Significance of Bioethics in Research
Significance of Bioethics in Research
- Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association)- set of ethical standards for human
research for the medical community.
- Belmont Report’s principles- the foundation for methods that provide informed consent, risk
assessment, and participant selection.
- As a result of the Belmont Report, federal research regulation has become more systematic
(Miller, R.L (2016).
NUREMBERG CODE
The Nuremberg Military Tribunals(1946) revealed atrocities done by Nazi doctors in the name of medical
science, providing little doubt the most powerful reason to try to regulate research involving human
subjects.
The Belmont Report (1979) (National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical
and Behavioral Research)
- Statement of fundamental ethical principles and standards that should aid in the resolution
of ethical issues that arise in the conduct of human subject research.
- Contains the Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of
Research (guide the conduct of biomedical and behavioral research involving human
subjects.
- The Commission was instructed to consider: boundaries between biomedical and behavioral
research and accepted and routine medical practice
- The role of risk-benefit criteria in determining the appropriateness of research involving
human subjects
- Appropriate guidelines for the selection of human subjects for participation in research
- The nature and definition of informed consent in various research settings
- Nurses frequently encounter ethical difficulties when caring for a large number of patients.
These ethical dilemmas come in a variety of shapes and sizes.
- CODES OF ETHICS FOR NURSES- reflect the many issues that nurses confront, and serve as a
social compact between nurses and the general public.
-inadequate competencies- when nurses are not fully equipped to do their tasks.
- Informed consent- when there is concern that patients and their families have not been informed, or do
not understand the treatments being administered to them, a dilemma can arise
- Protecting patient privacy and confidentiality- nurses should act in the best interest of their patients
- setting professional boundaries- patients should not place undue reliance on nurses, nor should they
form sexual ties with them or give them presents.
- addressing advanced care planning- tough topic to discuss when it involves end-of-life care
- inadequate resources and staffing- Patients are at risk of not receiving adequate care when medical
institutions are short on resources
Documentation in health care includes all forms of documentation by health care professionals (doctor,
nurse or other allied health professionals) recorded in a professional capacity to the provision of patient
care.
1. Clarity- be specific, use only accepted medical terminology and standard abbreviation
2. Conciseness- short, brief and direct to the point.
3. Completeness- fill out ALL forms with the correct information and provide complete data in the
medical record
4. Confidentiality- the patient’s medical records must be kept confidential and safe
5. Chronological order- well-organized medical records are easy to access and manage
PURPOSE OF GUIDELINES
Guidelines provided by WHO support employers, policymakers, managers, and clinical staff in
documentation practices and policies that demonstrate professional obligation. Professional
documentation encompasses any type of documentation created by a clinician in the course of providing
patient care.
1. Organizational support
2. Leadership -This encourages clinical personnel to participate in decision-making about the
selection, implementation, and evaluation of documentation systems.
3. Professional development- processes for performance management that give opportunities
to enhance documentation procedures.
4. Communication systems- encourage proper information exchange throughout the
interdisciplinary team.
5. Responsive to change- documentation system and practices that are adaptable to change.
6. Documentation policy- medical records officers should make certain that they have
established policies, procedures, and quality assurance processes.
7. Monitoring documentation- audit procedure is one aspect of effective risk management.
A. Moral decision making- is imperative to arrive at an ethical action or intervention. Develops from
clinical expertise and is a core competency for nurse leaders
CONSCIENCE FORMATION:
- The word conscience arises from Latin, conscienta and the French word conciense.
- Defined as the internal sense of what is right and wrong, and one’s ability to choose
between, as well act upon, what one perceives to be the right thing to do.
- In nursing, conscience is broadly perceived as an authority, a warning signal
- Nurses’ troubled conscience have been associated with feelings of guilt when:
● Nurses’ core beliefs conflict with social or professional belief
● Nurses cannot fulfill their care obligations to patients due to time constraints
● Nurses are placed in scenarios where they feel they are working against their
conscience
Conscience Formation
- Making moral decisions demand mature responsibility – free, correct, clear and certain
- Discern what is right and what is wrong
QUALITY OF CONSCIENCE
OBJECTIVE VALUE
- Correct- subjective conforms to the objective moral values
- Objective- norms of morality
- Erroneous- lack of conformity to the objective norms of morality
- Culpable- one is in error and therefore responsible
- Inculpable- has erred in good faith
MORAL ATTITUDE
DEGREE OF CERTITUDE
- The patient or surrogate has the right to refuse treatment or demand the
discontinuance of treatment in order to avoid suffering or to avoid the difficulties of
continued treatment.
- When a patient is in a terminal condition but not in immediate danger, and provided
that the patient or their surrogate has given consent, it seems ethically justifiable to
refrain from treatment as it would be futile in impeding the advancement of the
disease. However, it is crucial to emphasize that withholding care is not ethical, as it is
imperative to uphold human dignity.
Discontinuing treatment
- It is illogical to extend life when the ultimate outcome is the
prolongation of suffering and deterioration. Moreover, when
treatment only serves to prolong the agony experienced by the
patient, its continuation becomes unethical as it undermines human
dignity.
-In the realm of medical ethics, it is crucial to consider the well-being
and quality of life of terminally ill patients. While it may seem intuitive
to exhaust all available treatment options, it is essential to recognize
that prolonging life does not always equate to enhancing its quality. In
fact, in cases where the patient's condition is irreversible and their
suffering is exacerbated by ongoing treatment, it becomes ethically
imperative to reevaluate the continuation of such interventions.
- The ethical correctness of not initiating or discontinuing treatment
for consenting terminally ill patients is grounded in several
compelling reasons. By prioritizing the patient's well-being,
respecting their autonomy, and considering the allocation of limited
resources.
- In such cases, the health care provider would be ethically justified
in discontinuing treatment except when the patient insists on
treatment. There can be exceptions. Where there is a shortage of
medical resources, the physician might be justified in stopping non
indicated treatment.
- The cessation of life-sustaining treatment does not always bring about
swift and painless death, even though it may speed up the process of
dying. It is always the obligation of the physician to ensure that the
patient receives proper continuous care. This obligation to care for the
patient demands that every ethical effort be made to alleviate these
sufferings with drugs and other methods that will prolong life.
FEEDING AND HYDRATION
Are nutrition and hydration medically indicated for terminal patient?
- in treating the terminally ill or irreversibly comatose patient, the physician should
determine whether the benefits of treatment outweigh its burdens. At all times the
dignity of the patient should be maintained.
The AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs expressed the emerging
consensus that it is not wrong to withdraw these treatment under appropriate
circumstances
[Link] procedure are futile, since the procedures are unlikely to achieve their
purpose
[Link] procedures would be no help to the patient even if succesful
[Link] burdens outweigh the benefits
(Lynn,J. and Childress, J., 1983. Cited in Baillie, H., et al, 2019, p.177)
Examples of FUTILE Treatments
[Link] patient has burns over most of his body and severe clotting
deficiency that would make it nearly impossible to control the
bleeding caused by the burns.
[Link] patient has severe congestive heart failure with cancer of the
stomach, which delivers food to the colon without passing through
intestine and being absorbed.
In the second class of cases, there is no possibility of benefit to the
patient who has permanently lost of consciousness, as in patients
with anencephaly (the absence of a major portion of the brain,
skull and scalp), vegetative state, and preterminal coma. In this
cases, feeding is sometimes done for the sake of the family, but it
is not medically indicated.
There are cases in which feeding and hydration impose a
disproportionate burden.
[Link] patient’s need for nutrition arises in near death, a point at which
hydration causes terminal pulmonary edema, nausea and mental
confusion
[Link] who, although might benefit in one way, have fairly severe
dementia, such that restraints are needed, with the result that the patient
suffer constant fear and discomfort as he or she struggles to be free.
Life is prolonged but in a captive state(Lynn, J. and Childress, J.,1983. Cited
in Baillie, H., et al.,2019, pp.177-178).
IN CAPSULE:
When hydration and nutrition become medical procedures,
the ethics of their omission is based on the ethics of medical
indications and not on commonsense notions.
When a competent patient is sedated to control pain, his
resulting incompetence is due to the sedation. Hydration and
nutrition cannot be withdrawn at that time, if his incompetence
is cited as part of the justification for the withdrawal. The
physician cannot create an adverse condition and then use that
as justification for ceasing treatment.
In some cases nutrition and hydration are indicated on the
compassionate ground that such a death is sometimes more painful
than death from the particular disease. The patient may be faced with
the choice between slow death from cancer with adequate pain control
or a slightly more rapid and more painful death from dehydration and
starvation.
Healthcare professionals involve in hospice work have observe that,
although deprivation of nutrition and hydration is painful in healthy
people, they do not as a rule produce pain and suffering in the
terminally ill (Cox, 1987).
Medication can almost completely eliminate the possible
discomforts associated with the deprivation of nutrition and
hydration.
One cannot, then, simply assume that starvation or dehydration is
always painful, or for that matter that is never painful. Each case
must be evaluated individually, and ultimately the choice of the
manner of death belongs to the competent patient.
COOPERATION WITH THE REFUSAL OF TREATMENT BY A NON TERMINAL
PATIENT
The most emotionally challenging cases arise when patients refuse
treatment, even though they are not currently in a terminal condition.
However, their condition will inevitably deteriorate if the respirator is
disconnected or if the treatment is not initiated or discontinued.
This situation often occurs when patients believe that living indefinitely
on a respirator or being artificially fed for an extended period is not a
meaningful existence. It is a decision made by patients who choose not
to settle for a life below their personal ideals.
In such instances, healthcare professionals are faced with complex
ethical dilemmas that require careful consideration and sensitivity. These
cases demand a delicate balance between respecting the patient's
autonomy and ensuring their well-being. The decision to forego
treatment is deeply personal and can be profoundly distressing for both
the patient and their loved ones.
It is vital to provide patients with comprehensive information about
alternative options and potential consequences. This includes discussing
palliative care, pain management, and other supportive measures that
can enhance their quality of life. By presenting a range of possibilities,
patients can make informed decisions that align with their values and
aspirations.
Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that patients feel empowered and
respected throughout the decision-making process. By acknowledging
their autonomy and providing compassionate care, healthcare
professionals can navigate these emotionally challenging cases with
professionalism and integrity.
Only a court order or a court-appointed guardian has the right to overrule
the patient in these cases. The justice of even such court rulings is not
beyond question if the death will not injure society or third parties.
What, however, the said case in which the non terminal patient
not only refuses indicated treatment, but ask the healthcare
provider to keep him/her comfortable while he /she dies?the
health care can ethically refuse to cooperate in such situations,
because the health care professions should not be involve in
helping non terminal patients shorten their lives significantly.
Healthy or mildly ill patients do not have the right to force
physicians or hospitals to provide positive support for their
attempts at self-destruction.
PHYSICIAN INITIATIVES
▪ The physician is obligated to inform the patient clearly and
completely about his condition in order to obtain consent for
treatment. This should include an accurate description of the burdens
and benefits of continued treatment and the odds of success.
▪ The physician is obligated to provide treatment that does not harm
the patient.
▪ A no-code order is a written order to do nothing if certain situation
arise. Most, commonly DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) order, a written
order not to attempt resuscitation in case of cardiac arrest.
▪ No code order is correct when, from a medical point of view, more
harm than good will be done to the patient by treatment or
resuscitation. It should be noted that this is a written order for which
the physician accepts public responsibility and that should be medically
justified on chart. Granted these condition and consent, no-code order
is ethical.
▪ The slow code used to give families the impression that everything is
done for the patient in situations in which most of the time a no-code
order would be medically and ethically justified.
▪ The partial code a written order to omit some medical interventions,
but to employ others. There may be sound medical reasons to attempt
chest compression and electrical defibrillation or to omit intubation.
The reasons for these specific orders and omissions should be entered
on the chart, to avoid any ambiguity, all no-code orders should specify
what is not to be done with respect to each illness. Such specification
will clarify thinking and accountability and help reduce the risk of
carelessness (Baillie, H., et al., 2019, p.182)
ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS TO THE DYING
❖ Care for the Dying and Pain Control
- as death approaches and the technical devices of medically intensive care
become useless, there is need for humanily intensive care. The dying
patient needs support and comfort of staff, family and friends.
- Limits on visit should be removed.
- Long-absent relatives should be encouraged to come so that
reconciliations may be made or memories shared.
❖ Pain Control, especially in the dying patient, has been a neglected
area in health care. Studies suggest that patients in pain want pain
relief, not death.(Colburn, 1996). one of the central problems in pain
control is the issue of who decides when the patient when the patient is
in pain.
❖ Fear of the patient getting high or becoming an addict binds the
caregiver to the reality of the patient’s suffering. Generally, when the
patient says he is in pain, his judgment should be the one that matters
(Henkelman, 1994). there is a little reason a dying patient should not be
kept comfortable, particularly when that is her request (Catholic Health
Association, 1993)
SURROGATES AND THE TERMINATION OF TREATMENT
❖ When the patient is often incompetent, the health care team needs to
consult the surrogates about discontinuing treatment for the terminal
patient.
❖ Ethically, the health care professional generally has no obligation to do
what is not medically indicated. The exceptions arise when the patient
or the surrogate has non medical reasons for continuing the treatment.
ETHICAL PROBLEMS OF DEATH AND DYING
Advance Directives
• Includes living wills , healthcare proxies, and durable powers of attorney
for health care (Blais and Hayes, 2011).
• They are values of informed consent , patient autonomy over end-of-life
decisions, truth telling and control over the dying process.
Living Wills represent written documents that direct treatment in
accordance with a patient’s wishes in the event of terminal illness and
condition. Are often difficult to interpret and not clinically specific in
unforeseen circumstances.
• Healthcare proxies or Durable Power of attorney for Health Care- is a
legal document that designates a person or people of one’s choosing to
make decisions on his or her own behalf.
ETHICAL CONCERNS IN THE END-OF-LIFE CARE
❖ Ethics in Medical Decision Making
❖ Patient’s goals of care are what patients place highest value on and
would hope to achieve in regard to their illness. Sometimes, there can
be conflicts between what the clinician believe to be the best for the
patient and what the patient and family want to have done.
❖ Difficult Decisions in End-of-life care
❖ The nurse should focus on helping the patient weigh the benefits and
burdens of the intervention, rather that focus in the intervention itself
(Kennedy Swartz, 2001).
Difficult decision that patients often need to make in end-of-life are as as
follows:
• Withholding or withdrawing of Medical Interventions
• Do not attempt Resuscitation(DNAR)
• Allows natural death (AND)
• Medical Order for Life sustaining Treatment (MOLST))- sometimes
referred to as Physician order to life-sustaining treatment
• Hastening death (principle of Double Effect)
• Terminal / Palliative sedation
Criterias required for Palliative Sedation
- Patient has a terminal illness
-Severe symptoms are not responsive to treatment and intolerable to
patient
-A “do no resuscitate” order is in effect
-Death is imminent (hours to days)
Terminal sedation has been compared with slow euthanasia and
assisted dying; how ever they are not the same thing. The key difference
is based on the intent or purpose of the intervention. The intent is not
to hasten death but to relieve suffering that cannot be relieved by any
other available method.
Assisted dying
- an action in which an individual’s death is intentionally hastened by the
administration of a drug or other lethal substances” (Volker, 2010). there
are two distinct subcategories:
Assisted suicide- the patient is provided with the means to carry out
suicide, such as providing with a lethal dose of a medication.
active euthanasia- someone other than the patient is the one who carries
out the action that ends the patients life (Volker, 2010).
The vast majority of ethical codes from the main nurses’ organizations
prohibit the involvement of a nurse in the assisted dying of patients.
IN CAPSULE:
❑ Nurses caring for patient at the end have a moral and professional
obligation to follow guidelines depicted in their professional and ethical
standards.
❑ The absence of an directive can make end of life decision-making
difficult for families of dying patients who are no longer able to speak
for themselves.
❑ Nurses need to advocate to ensure that their patients’’ goals of care are
met while following ethical principles.
Right to self-determination
✔ The patient has the right to avail himself/herself of any recommended
diagnostic and treatment procedure. Any person of legal age and of
sound mind may make an advance written directive for physicians to
administer terminal care when they suffer from the terminal phase of
terminal illness, provided that:
• He is informed of the medical consequences of his choice;
• He releases those involved in his care from any obligation relative to
the consequences of his decisions;
• His decision will not prejudice public health and safety;
• He/she is informed of the medical consequences of his/her decision;
THE LIVING WILL AND DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY
The living will- a document signed and witnessed at a time when the
patient is clearly competent. It is a patient’s directive to continue or to
withhold treatment or to administer pain killing drugs if the person has an
incurable disease, illness or condition from which the patient has become
incompetent and can no longer speak for himself or herself.
• In practice, it is most frequently used to discontinue treatment.
• The durable (or permanent) power of attorney appoints for health
affairs and gives general direction to that surrogate. It is more flexible
than the living will in that powers of the surrogate or agent are not
limited to desire concerning life- prolonging treatment.
• Both the living will and the durable power of attorney in health matters
are useful because they provide clear instructions of the will of a
competent person and help to avoid conflicts among surrogates as well
as debates as to which surrogates has the authority to consent or the
correct interpretation of the wishes of the patient.
• The most difficult cases are when the wishes of the now-incompetent
patient are unknown, the surrogates insists on aggressive treatment to
assuage their own guilt, and the physician regards the treatment as
prolonging the agony of a dying patient.
THE PLACE OF ETHICS COMMITEES
The mission of ethics committees:
[Link] are supposed to educate the hospital and its employees, as well as
the other constituencies of the hospitals.
2. They are to develop policies with regard to the problem areas, especially
the problems of death and dying.
[Link] are to act as advisory consultants to healthcare providers and
possibly families (Levine, 1984)
• this 3rd function can be looked at as support mechanism for
decision-makers, both lay and professional.
THE PLACE OF THE FAMILY IN DEATH AND DYING
• At a certain point in the dying process, the family members become
secondary patients in need of information about the state of affairs and
emotional support.
Some hospitals have formed bioethics teams to provide support to
families and to aid them in making difficult decisions about terminating or
continuing treatment.
Team consist of:
-Physician
-nurse
- social worker
- member of the clergy
THE VALUE AND QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE INDIVIDUAL
PERSONS
• Biological human life has value as a means, a precondition
for specifically human activities of a human person. This makes
us face the crucial questions of what activities are specifically
human, such that lacking or a reasonable hope of getting them
back makes biological human life cease to have value for
anyone.
IN CAPSULE:
The main issue is that the patients may ethically refuse treatment
for proportionate reasons, and health care professionals may
cooperate with those patients’ requests.
The central issue remains caring for the dignity of the patient,
which involves respecting the patient’s wishes, protecting the
integrity of the profession, and sparring the patient life under
conditions which are generally understood to be extremely
burdensome either because of pain, suffering or
degradation(Baillie, et al., 2019, pp..167-195).
• Reference:
• Quiambao-Udan, Josie, Cu, Neugene Rowan S., Cañete, Geraldine S.,
Bartolata, Richard L. – Health Care Ethics 1st edition 2023
Week 11
Bioethics and Research
A. Principles of Ethics in Research
B. Nuremberg Code
C. Declaration of Helsinki
D. Belmont Report
Week 11
E. Ethical Issues in Evidenced Based
Practice
F. Ethico-moral Obligations of the
Nurse in Evidenced Based Practices
G. Introduction to Good Clinical
Practice Guidelines
NCM 108
HEALTHCARE ETHICS
ETHICAL ISSUES RELATED TO TECHNOLOGY
AND DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE
Intended Learning Outcomes:
- identify the ethical considerations in the use of appropriate technology in
delivering safe and efficient health care services
A. Data Protection and Security
- The act of protecting information, both sensitive and personal sensitive
to unauthorized access and use.
- Protection has various advantages:
→ allows employees to safely share shared logical and physical address
spaces.
→ Staff have particular authorization to access the information needed to
execute their duties.
→ Different users can access a system’s memory via physical address
spaces inside a system, boosting resource efficiency
• 3 main attributes of SECURITY:
AVAILABILITY- relates to the prevention of unauthorized actors
withholding information,
CONFIDENTIALITY-
INTEGRITY -(both are concerned with information staying private
and undamaged by malevolent actors)
- External dangers are often classified as either INDIRECT or DIRECT
• INDIRECT threats examples:
- Trojan
- Worm
- Computer virus
• DIRECT threats example:
- Targeted attack by a hacker
• Protection is a strategy used within systems to handle hazards and
ensure proper operation.
• Provides the framework for controlling access to data, processes
programs, and other resources.
1. HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS
The expense of technology is one of the most significant difficulties for
enterprises in terms of installation and subsequent upkeep.
The inability to precisely measure intangible patient and cost
advantages makes valuing and justifying capital spending on new
technologies problematic. When compared to broad deployments,
remote monitoring may be viewed as a compromise.
Proponents say that reducing needless hospitalization can reduce healthcare
expenses, which may be especially important in chronic illness management. This is
advantageous from the utilitarian standpoint in terms of achieving successful
outcomes for as many patients as feasible. However, the evidence reveals that remote
monitoring does not save costs for a great majority of people.
Most studies according to Zarif (2022) show little, if any, cost reductions and
occasionally increased expenses, nevertheless, favorable clinical results for chronic
illness treatment have been observed.
According to Rawls’ Difference Principle, the literature is not in favor of cost-cutting
measures that help the majority of most vulnerable people. It has been proposed that
remote monitoring may incur higher expenditures for underrepresented communities.
As a result, it is vital to avoid developing a false feeling of organizational autonomy,
which might lead to a shift in the healthcare organization’s role from a
patient-centered to a profit-centered agenda.
Interoperability is a concern raised by the idea of “new” technology.
Integration and cross-access of data and use between multiple systems or
even different versions may be problematic due to the timeframes
involved. This, according to some, is a blatant breach of organizations’
ethical responsibilities, arising from their fiduciary connection with
patients, to guarantee that the absorption of old systems meets
integration criteria (Zarif, 2022).
2. HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
Although healthcare technology offers great opportunities to enhance
healthcare outcomes, improper use must be addressed. The technological
imperative relates to the inevitability of new technology and its necessary
character, which indicates the necessity for adoption for social benefit. The
dominance of technology in healthcare arguably modifies the objective of
healthcare from preservation and restoration under responsible autonomy
to death prevention.
• This raises the moral plight of utilizing the patient as a way of achieving
end-of-life prevention, breaching one of the core guiding principles of
medical ethics: autonomy.
3. PATIENTS
The implications of the moral obligation bleed over into the issues that
patients face. The necessity to ensure the appropriate use of costly
equipment (at least during the early adoption period) and the moral
obligation to use new technology directly contradicts the need to
protect patient autonomy, as drawn from the application of
personalism to healthcare systems.
Their manifestation is their one-of-a-kind worth, which includes
inherent attributes like free will. The person’s participation in decisions
centered on them can achieve their causal potential. Thus, the
challenge to the moral imperative is a clear breach within the
patient-centered paradigm of modern medicine.
The position of technology, on the other hand, does not have
to be limited to a false dichotomy of either the
value-neutrality dictum or the value-ladenness thesis. The
acceptance of technical value does not mean our subjection to
the technological imperative and loss of autonomy. Zarif
(2022) on Cassell contends that the value-ladenness of
technology stems from its inherent features, which correlate
to human nature’s shortcomings. Thus, managing the
value-ladenness of technology involves governance of our
values and self-control, whereas managing its ethical issues
necessitates management of our ethics.
C. CURRENT TECHNOLOGY: ISSUES AND DILEMMA
1. PRIVACY AND SECURITY
∙ The issue of privacy and security will always be in question once
technology is applied in the healthcare setting. Autonomy and
transparency relate to this issue as to what choice can the patient make.
∙ According to Shaw and Donia (2021) it is in the interest of technology
developers and other supporters of digital health to keep attention
focused on technical challenges that can be contained and addressed
using technical approaches.
2. SOCIOTECHNICAL HEALTH
∙ Shaw and Donia (2021) defined sociotechnical as the observation that issues
on technologies such as applications of digital health are never solely about
the material technology itself, but about the mutual dependencies between
technologies and the social arrangements in which they are built and used.
∙ By the same token, “social arrangements” are always infused with various
technologies, ranging from chairs and whiteboard design rooms to
smartphone applications and videoconferencing software that mediate human
interactions.
∙ The term “sociotechnical” thus denotes a broadening of focus from the issues
defined by technology itself, to the broader universe of issues opened up by
the recognition that technologies are built and embedded in the social world
in ways that profoundly shape and are shaped by human life.
2.1 APPLICATION OF SOFTWARE
∙ Shaw and Donia (2021) identified that the ethical issues at the
level of application software include effectiveness, usability,
inclusiveness, transparency, and other issues related to the
functioning and direct use of the digital health offering.
2.2 MATERIAL DEVICE AND SUPPLY CHAINS
∙ The actual materials used to build and distribute the devices through
which humans interact with digital health technologies are frequently
overlooked in ethical analysis, but they are crucial for a comprehensive
view of digital health ethics.
∙ The materials used to manufacture smartphones and other digital
devices are extracted from the earth and shipped internationally,
reinforcing low-wage labor in low-income countries while benefiting
primarily large corporations in high-income countries (Shaw and Donia,
2021).
2.3 INFRASTRUCTURES
∙ This refers to the hardware and software required to operate digital
devices. Shaw and Donia, (2021) added that infrastructures include
buildings in which healthcare providers work when delivering virtual
care, the cables and wires that enable digital signals to travel over
distance, and the corporate structures of the organizations that make
digital communication available. Ethical issues relevant to infrastructure
include a lack of high-speed internet availability that precludes a
particular community from accessing digital health care.
2.4 INDIVIDUAL HEALTH-RELATED PRACTICES
∙ Shaw and Donia (2021) highlighted that digital technologies are used in a variety of
health-related applications, many of which are intended to promote healthy activity
and the management of disease among individual people. Digital health is often
infused with self-tracking mechanisms that have an impact on encouraging people
about whether and how their actions align with expected social norms.
∙ Ethical issues include the power of self-tracking and “nudge” technologies to shape
and constrain human behavior. The power of technology to influence mental
well-being as a result of reduced self-esteem, and its power to influence individual
actions, are ethically relevant and should be acknowledged in related ethical analysis
of digital health.
2.5 INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIP
∙ Digital health technologies have the potential to have a wide range of
effects on interpersonal relationships. (Example. Significant impact of
social media applications on public understanding of health-related
science and policy).
∙ Health-related social media use has the potential to foster interpersonal
networks that reinforce specific epistemic viewpoints on health-related
issues, potentially harming public health.
∙ Another case in point is the impact of technology-mediated
communication on the relationship between a healthcare provider and a
patient.
2.6 ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES
∙ Digital technologies have the potential to dramatically alter daily work
practices, and thus the structure and function of organizations.
∙ How healthcare organizations navigate the transition from analog to
digital work environments is likely to have far-reaching consequences for
the nature of healthcare work and patient care.
∙ Then impact of organizations such as insurance companies that use
digital health technologies to collect information about individual
behaviors and shape their product offerings accordingly. Advances in
digital health technologies have made such practices more effective, and
the role they should play in the insurance industry in the future is an
organizational policy issue that requires careful ethical consideration.
Digitalization of the healthcare setting workflow is here to stay.
A relevant socio-technical approach to ethical analysis must be
done to avoid overshadowing the concerns brought about by
using technology. Usability and ethical use can always go hand
in hand given the proper moral and ethical standpoint of
developers and healthcare professionals.
• Reference:
• Quiambao-Udan, Josie, Cu, Neugene Rowan S., Cañete, Geraldine S.,
Bartolata, Richard L. – Health Care Ethics 1st edition 2023
NCM 108
HEALTHCARE ETHICS
CONTINUING EDUCATION PROGRAMS ON
ETHICO-MORAL PRACTICE IN NURSING
Intended Learning Outcomes:
- Demonstrate beginning professional behavior
-Exemplify love for country in service of the Filipinos.
• CONTINUING EDUCATION PROGRAMS ON ETHICO-MORAL
PRACTICE IN NURSING
A. LOBBYING/ ADVOCATING FOR ETHICAL ISSUES IN HEALTHCARE
• Advocacy- the act or process of promoting a cause or proposal
• Lobbying- the act or process of influencing public officials to promote
(something, such as a project) or secure the passage of (legislation)
❖ Nurse advocates or lobbies to raise awareness of an issue- the actual
intent of the act is different.
❖ To advocate is to raise and publicize an issue within a community, such
as making health care a topic of national debate and media attention.
❖ Lobbying is the process of directing one’s efforts toward individuals
in positions of authority, such as public officials, politicians,
government bodies, and regulatory agencies (Bradley University,
n.d.)
❖ Nurses’ advocates can communicate from various platforms (social
media, professional conferences).
❖ Nurse lobbyists are distinguished by their explicit effort to steer
those talks toward a specific goal: influencing public policy or
legislation formation. While advocacy is the catalyst for a grassroots
movement, lobbying is the mechanism to achieve the desired
change.
• NURSES’ PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES include the preservation and
promotion of human rights in health and health care (ANA, 2016).
The following initiatives to advocate for ethical issues in health care:
∙ Nurses may advocate for ethical and just nursing practice by building
and maintaining environments that promote established norms of
professional behavior.
∙ Nurses may improve the practice environment by refusing to practice in
ways that are detrimental to patient care quality.
∙ Nurses may reinforce and strengthen nursing beliefs and ideals through
their professional organization, which interprets and explains nursing’s
place and role in society.
∙ Human rights abuses involving patients, nurses, healthcare
professionals, and others must be closely monitored by healthcare
institutions/organizations.
∙ Healthcare institutions must support policies and practices that actively
maintain environments that ensure ethical nursing practice, safeguard
human rights and means for reporting infractions, as well as take action
to prevent recurrence.
∙ Nurses from all practice settings may serve on ethics committees, seek
to encourage colleagues to consider ethics and human rights, and take
political action to clarify and promote health policy that improves access
to and equality treatment.
∙ Nurses must examine the conflicts that arise between their own
personal and professional values and the values and interests of others
who are responsible for patient care and healthcare decisions, and
they must resolve these conflicts in ways that ensure patient safety and
promote the patient’s best interests.
∙ Nurses may collaborate with other healthcare professionals to build
moral communities that promote, protect, and preserve ethical
practice and the human rights of all patients and professional
stakeholders.
❖ Nurse educators must use the following notions of justice and care as
guiding principles in teaching students about ethics and human rights in
healthcare settings all over the world from local communities to global
communities.
❖ Through material, clinical and field experiences, and critical thinking, nurse
educators must firmly anchor students in nursing professional duty to
challenge unjust systems and structures, reflecting the profession’s
commitment to social justice and health.
❖ Nurse researchers must ensure that human rights are respected by
obtaining ongoing informed permission, assessing the risk vs benefit of
research participants, and avoiding damage.
❖ Nurse researchers may undertake research relevant to communities of
interest, are guided by community participation in identifying research
challengers, and endeavor to improve patients, society, and professional
practice.
❖ Nurse administrators must put ethical and human rights concepts into
practice by keeping an eye on the practice environment for actual or
potential human rights breaches by patients, nurses, and other
healthcare employees.
❖ Nurse administrators must evaluate policy and practice to detect the risk
of diminished care quality as a result of unrecognized human rights
breaches.
• In their organizations and beyond, nurse administrators may
actively foster a caring, just, inclusive, and collaborative
environment.
• NURSES MUST BE COMPLETELY AWARE OF THEIR PATIENT’S
RIGHTS IN ALL SITUATIONS, AGES, AND DEVELOPMENTAL SKILLS,
AND BE WILLING TO ADVOCATE FOR THEM AND WORK WITH
OTHERS TO FIND ETHICAL SOLUTIONS (COUNCIL OF EUROPE,
n.d.)
• Nurses fight for patient’s rights in a caring environment,
especially for those whose rights are more readily infringed or
not met. Nurses are concerned about the human rights of
themselves, their patients, their coworkers, and both local and
global communities. Respect for the inherent dignity, value,
distinctive traits, and human rights of all individuals underpins
effective nursing practice in all situations (ANA, 2016.)
• B. CODE OF ETHICS FOR NURSES
• 1. INTERNATIONAL CODE OF ETHICS
❖ The ICN Code of Ethics for Nurses is a statement of the ethical values,
responsibilities, and professional standards of nurses. It guides
everyday ethical nursing practice and can serve as a regulatory tool to
guide and define ethical nursing practice.
• An international code of ethics for nurses was first adopted by the
International Council of Nurses (ICN) in 1953. It has been revised and
reaffirmed at various times since, most recently with this review and
revision completed in 2012.
❖ Nurses have four fundamental responsibilities to promote health, to prevent
illness, to restore health, and to alleviate suffering. The need for nursing is
universal.
❖ Inherent in nursing is a respect for human rights, including cultural rights,
the right to life and choice, to dignity and to be treated with respect.
Nursing care is respectful of and unrestricted by considerations of age,
color, creed, culture, disability or illness, gender, sexual orientation,
nationality, politics, race or social status.
• Nurses render health services to the individual, the family, and the
community and coordinate their services with those of related groups
• ELEMENTS OF THE CODE
1. NURSES AND PEOPLE
nurse’s primary professional responsibility is to people requiring nursing
care.
In providing care, the nurse promotes an environment in which the human
rights, values, customs and spiritual beliefs of the individual, family and
community are respected.
The nurse ensures that the individual receives accurate, sufficient and
timely information in a culturally appropriate manner
The nurse holds in confidence personal information and uses judgement in
sharing this information
The nurse shares with society the responsibility for initiating and
supporting action to meet the health and social needs of the public, in
particular those of vulnerable populations.
The nurse advocates for equity and social justice in resource
allocation, access to health care and other social and economic
services.
The nurse demonstrates professional values such as respectfulness,
responsiveness, compassion, trustworthiness, and integrity.
2. NURSE AND PRACTICE
The nurse carries personal responsibility and accountability for nursing
practice, and for maintaining competence by continual learning.
The nurse maintains a standard of personal health such that the ability
to provide care is not compromised.
The nurse uses judgment regarding individual competence when
accepting and delegating responsibility.
The nurse at all times maintains standards of personal conduct which
reflect well on the profession and enhance its image and public
confidence.
The nurse, in providing care, ensures that use of technology and
scientific advances are compatible with the safety, dignity and rights
of people.
The nurse strives to foster and maintain a practice culture promoting
ethical behavior and open dialogue.
3. NURSES AND THE PROFESSION
The nurse assumes the major role in determining and implementing
acceptable standards of clinical nursing practice, management,
research and education.
The nurse is active in developing a core of research-based
professional knowledge that supports evidence- based practice.
The nurse is active in developing and sustaining a core of
professional values.
The nurse, acting through the professional organization, participates
in creating a positive practice environment and maintaining safe,
equitable social and economic working conditions in nursing.
The nurse practices to sustain and protect the natural environment and
is aware of its consequences on health.
The nurse contributes to an ethical organizational environment and
challenges unethical practices and settings.
4. NURSES AND CO-WORKERS
The nurse sustains a collaborative and respectful relationship with
co-workers in nursing and other fields.
The nurse takes appropriate action to safeguard individuals, families,
and communities when their health is endangered by a co-worker or
any other person.
The nurse takes appropriate action to support and guide co-workers
to advance ethical conduct.
To achieve its purpose the Code must be understood, internalized and
used by nurses in all aspects of their work. It must be available to
students and nurses throughout their study and work lives.
❖ APPLYING THE ELEMENTS OF THE ICN CODE OF ETHICS FOR
NURSES
• The four elements of the ICN Code of ethics for Nurses: nurses
and people, nurses and practice, nurses and the profession, and
nurses and co-workers, give a framework for the standards of
conduct.
→ Nurses and nursing students can therefore:
- Study the standards under each element of the Code.
- Reflect on what each standard means to you. Think about how you
can apply ethics in your nursing domain: practice, education,
research or management.
- Discuss the Code with co-worker and others.
- Use a specific example from experience to identify ethical dilemmas
and standards of conduct as outlined in the Code. Identify how you
would resolve the dilemmas.
- Work in groups to clarify ethical decision making and reach a
consensus on standards of ethical conduct.
- Collaborate with your National Nurses Association, co-workers, and
others in the continuous application of ethical standards in nursing
practice, education, management, and research
ELEMENT OF THE CODE #1:
PRACTITIONERS AND MANAGERS
∙ Provide care that respects human rights and is sensitive to the values,
customs, and beliefs of people.
∙ Provide continuing education on ethical issues.
∙ Provide sufficient information to permit informed consent to nursing and
/or medical care, and the right to choose or refuse treatment.
∙ Use recording and information management systems that ensure
confidentiality.
∙ Develop and monitor environmental safety in the workplace.
EDUCATORS AND RESEARCHERS
∙ In curriculum include references to human rights, equity, justice,
and solidarity as the basis for access to care.
∙ Provide teaching and learning opportunities for ethical issues and
decision-making.
∙ Provide teaching/ learning opportunities related to informed
consent, privacy and confidentiality, beneficence and maleficence.
∙ Introduce into curriculum concepts of professional values.
∙ Sensitize students to the importance of social action in current
concerns.
NATIONAL NURSES ASSOCIATIONS
∙ Develop position statements and guidelines that support human rights
and ethical standards.
∙ Lobby for the involvement of nurses in ethics committees.
∙ Provide guidelines, position statements, relevant documentation and
continuing education related to informed consent.
∙ To nursing and medical care.
∙ Incorporate issues of confidentiality and privacy into a national code of
ethics for nurses.
∙ Advocate for safe and healthy environment.
ELEMENT OF THE CODE #2:
PRACTITIONERS AND MANAGERS
∙ Establish standards of care and a work setting that promotes
quality of care.
∙ Establish systems for professional appraisal, continuing education
and systemic renewal of licensure to practice.
∙ Monitor and promote the personal health of nursing staff about
their competence for practice.
EDUCATORS AND RESEARCHERS
∙ Provide teaching/learning opportunities that foster lifelong learning and
competence for practice.
∙ Conduct and disseminate research that shows links between continual
learning and competence to practice.
∙ Promote the importance of personal health and illustrate its relation to
other values.
NATIONAL NURSES ASSOCIATIONS
∙ Provide access to continuing education, through journals, conferences,
distance, education, etc.
∙ Lobby to ensure continuing education opportunities and quality care
standards.
∙ Promote healthy lifestyles for nursing professionals. Lobby for healthy
workplaces and services for nurses.
ELEMENT OF THE CODE #3
• PRACTITIONERS AND MANAGERS
∙ Set standards for nursing practice, research, education and
management.
∙ Foster workplace support of the conduct, dissemination and utilization
of research related to nursing and health.
∙ Promote participation in national nurses’ associations to create
favorable socioeconomic conditions for nurses.
•
EDUCATORS AND RESEARCHERS
∙ Provide teaching/learning opportunities in setting standards for the
nursing process, research, education and management.
∙ Conduct, disseminate and utilize research to advance the nursing
profession.
∙ Sensitize learners to the importance of professional nursing associations.
NATIONAL NURSES ASSOCIATIONS
∙ Collaborate with others to set standards for nursing education, practice,
research and management.
∙ Develop position statements, guidelines and standards related to nursing
research.
∙ Lobby for fair social and economic working conditions in nursing. Develop
position statements and guidelines in workplace issues.
ELEMENT OF THE CODE #4:
PRACTITIONERS AND MANAGERS
∙ Create awareness of specific and overlapping functions and the potential
for interdisciplinary tensions and create strategies for conflict management.
∙ Develop workplace that support common professional ethical values and
behavior.
∙ Develop mechanisms to safeguard the individual, family or community
when their care is endangered by health care personnel.
EDUCATORS AND RESEARCHERS
∙ Develop understanding of the rules of other workers
∙ Communicate nursing ethics to other professions.
∙ Instill in learners the need to safeguard the individual, family or
community when care is endangered by healthcare personnel.