DHR-Workforce Report FY04
DHR-Workforce Report FY04
Annual
Workforce
Report
Fiscal Year 2004
State of Vermont
Annual Workforce Report
Fiscal Year 2004
Presented to
Governor James H. Douglas
and
The Vermont General Assembly
Prepared by:
Cynthia D. LaWare,
Commissioner
Greetings:
It is with great pleasure that I present the State of Vermont Annual Workforce Report for
fiscal year 2004 to Governor James H. Douglas and the members of the Vermont General
Assembly.
The Department of Human Resources has undergone enormous change over the past
year. We have continued to implement our new organization enabling us to focus on providing
the highest level of service to our customers: the Legislature, government leaders, and our
state employees who, in turn, deliver valued services within our Vermont communities. We have
successfully completed the Human Resource Management System’s technical upgrade which has
positioned us to begin to offer a variety of self-serve functionality thereby improving
administrative efficiencies. As we manage an integrated human resource and financial database,
we will provide information to the leadership of our state that is timely and meaningful and
supports them as they make sound business decisions that will enable Vermont to prepare for
the future.
These major initiatives have positioned our Human Resources Department and our
Human Resources Partners to achieve a more fundamental change as we become true business
partners with agency and department leadership. Never has the challenge been so great as we
compete for, develop and retain the talent state government will need to service the residents of
Vermont. As we endeavor to attract talent to state government, we must understand the value
proposition of working in state government and we must sell that value proposition to the
government leaders of tomorrow. We must also align our policies and practices to be consistent
with this value proposition as we create, manage and market our reputation as an employer of
choice.
Development today means providing people opportunities to learn from their work rather
than taking people out of their work to learn. Our policies must enable us to strategically use job
assignments for leadership development. And finally, we must understand what truly motivates
our workforce and have the flexibility and creativity to design new policies and total
compensation systems which will meet their needs.
As we look toward managing human resources in the future, we are challenged to keep
the following in mind:
If we are truly strategic thinkers we must keep these changes in mind and incorporate
them in our analysis of the human resource data and trends to effect positive change and
improve business results within state government. We must also remember that our actions will
speak louder than our words. And, treating everyone with respect and integrity will reinforce a
workplace culture that will ensure that we deliver exceptional services to the residents of and
visitors to the State of Vermont.
I hope this year’s State of Vermont Annual Workforce Report will be an effective
management tool as together we strive to meet the challenges of managing in state
government. On behalf of my professional colleagues within the Department of Human
Resources, we look forward to the work that lies ahead.
Sincerely,
Cynthia D. LaWare
Commissioner
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. 1
Employment ............................................................................................................................. 33
Table 11 Number of Classified Employees and FTEs by Fiscal Year ................................................. 34
Table 12 Number of Classified Employees and FTEs by Department by FY....................................... 35
Table 13 Number of Classified Employees by Occupational Group by Fiscal Year .............................. 36
Table 14 Characteristics of Applicants for Classified Jobs by Fiscal Year .......................................... 37
Table 15 New Hires by Department by Fiscal Year ....................................................................... 38
Table 16 New Hire Survey Results – Fiscal Year 2004 .................................................................. 39
Turnover .................................................................................................................................. 41
Table 17 Turnover Rate by Fiscal Year ....................................................................................... 42
Table 18 Turnover by Department by Fiscal Year ........................................................................ 43
Table 19 Turnover by Occupational Group by Fiscal Year .............................................................. 44
Table 20 Turnover Rates for Classified Job Titles - Fiscal Year 2004 ............................................... 45
Table 21 Turnover by Reason by Fiscal Year ............................................................................... 46
Table 22 Voluntary Turnover by Years of Service (5 Year Average) ................................................ 47
Table 23 Exit Survey Results – Fiscal Year 2004 ......................................................................... 48
Compensation .......................................................................................................................... 55
Table 29 Average Salary for Classified Employees by Fiscal Year ................................................... 56
Table 30 Average Salary for Classified Employees by Occupational Group – Fiscal Year 2004............. 57
Table 31 Overtime Costs by Department and Fiscal Year .............................................................. 58
Table 32 Compensatory Time Costs by Department and Fiscal Year ............................................... 59
NOTE: The data presented in this Annual Workforce Report – Fiscal Year 2004 is based on an end of fiscal year date of 6/12/04,
rather than 6/30/04. This was necessary because the reorganization of the Agency of Human Services, authorized by Act 45 passed
by the Legislature in 2003, was implemented beginning in Fiscal Year 2005 (7/1/04).
NOTE: Effective July 1, 2004 (the beginning of FY 05) Act 156 of the 2004 Legislative session changed the name of the Department
of Personnel to the Department of Human Resources. However, within this Annual Workforce Report the name Personnel is used
when reporting FY 04 data.
Section One
Labor Relations
► Grievance Tracking: The Labor Relations division has begun to fully utilize the
grievance tracking capabilities of our newly upgraded Human Capital Management
System (HCM). Step III grievances are tracked by the Labor Relations Division. A
pilot project is also underway with the Agency of Transportation and the Department
of Buildings and General Services to test the system tracking capabilities for Step I &
II grievances filed at the agency/department level. When fully implemented, we will
have the capability to provide management with meaningful information relative to
the location, types, and level of grievance filings. We will use this information to
target training and implement new programs to improve supervision and employee
relations thereby reducing the number of grievances filed throughout state
government.
Classification/Compensation
Payroll
► Business Process Review: Through the first half of 2004, the Information
Systems Division (ISD) worked with department staff and an upgrade partner to
understand the capabilities of the system, retool business process and eliminate
custom code. By involving more of the functional managers in the department and
HR partners throughout the State, we opened the system and its capabilities for
greater access and use in managing the HR functions.
Labor Relations - The Labor Relations Division negotiates State employee labor contracts
with the Vermont State Employees’ Association, Inc. (VSEA), monitors and coordinates the
implementation of any new provisions, administers the agreements for the State, and is
responsible for bargaining and implementing any mid-term revisions to the contracts. The
Division also administers the State’s Personnel Policies and Procedures. Technical human
resources and labor relations advice and support services are provided to other Department
of Human Resources divisions, and all other agency/department human resources staff,
managers, supervisors and employees. The Division also offers and conducts
supervisory/managerial training on labor relations and human resources issues.
► Labor Agreements for FY 06 and FY 07: The State and VSEA are in the process
of negotiating successor labor contracts for the Non-Management, Supervisory,
Corrections, and State Police Bargaining Units which will become effective in July
2005. In preparation for these negotiations, the Department of Human Resources
developed comprehensive historical and current data concerning the total
compensation of State employees and state and national economic data for the
corresponding ten-year historical period.
► Alternative Dispute Resolution: The State and VSEA are exploring the possibility
of implementing an alternative dispute resolution process that we believe may
encourage the mediation of grievances in lieu of the traditional, sometimes
adversarial grievance process.
• The integration of fire safety services within the Department of Public Safety;
• The redesignation of correctional facility superintendents as exempt
employees; and
• The integration of the Environmental and Water Resources Boards.
Continuing our commitment to Workforce Equity & Diversity, members of our Labor
Relations Division provide advice and technical assistance to managers and supervisors
regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act reasonable accommodation process, the
Family and Medical Leave Act, employment issues related to Workers’ Compensation,
Medical Reduction-in-Force and unpaid medical leaves of absence processes. Information
and training are available for all these topics. Professionals in this area also guide, direct,
assist, and monitor the administration of the State of Vermont’s Affirmative Action Program,
including ensuring fair and equal treatment of all executive branch employees and working
with agencies/departments to ensure that affirmative action and diversity are integrated
into their workforce planning, recruitment, promotion, transfer, and training efforts. During
2004, we focused on developing these efforts in the following areas:
► Outreach Initiative: This study, completed during 2004, examines the issue of
workplace diversity in State government by identifying areas of progress; outlining
strategies for expanding our employment outreach efforts and improving the hiring
process; and generally creating an environment conducive to attracting and retaining
a diversified workforce. The study, which organizes fifty recommendations into high,
intermediate and longer-range priorities, is available on-line at
[Link]
Represents Classification & Compensation Administration and our Employee Benefits &
Wellness Division, which combine to provide comprehensive insight into how the State of
Vermont rewards employee contribution.
► Job Series/Ladders: We continued our ongoing work in the area of reducing the
number of unique job titles by expanding the use of job series.
Calendar year 2004 continued to see positive health-related and financial outcomes as a
result of converting to CIGNA Healthcare, effective January 2002. In addition to
administrative savings gained by self-funding all health plans, the new plans were designed
to help control the escalating cost of health care. Our approach included plan redesign,
significantly enhanced disease management and wellness efforts, and aggressive pursuit of
purchasing options to maximize prescription drug plan savings.
► Single Digit Premium Rate Increases: Calendar year 2005 will be the second
year in a row that the State employees’ health plan premium increases have been
held to single digits. In 2005 premium rates will increase only 8% for each of the
self-funded CIGNA health care plans. Although premium rate increases are never
welcome, our health plans are doing well by both local and national standards.
Nationally, health care trends for 2005 are about 14%, and Vermont insurers have
implemented rate increases in the 12%-14% range. As we move into a new year we
fully recognize that there is still much work to be done, and are committed to
continuing our effort to ensure health care remains affordable for all employees,
retirees, and dependents covered under the State of Vermont employee health plans.
► Prescription Drug Program: During calendar year 2004 our health plans have
benefited from re-negotiated financial improvements to our prescription drug
contract. These August 2003 improvements included increases in the discounts the
State obtains for both brand and generic drugs, improved rebates on mail order
prescriptions, and a reduction in claim processing fees. The renegotiated terms were
designed to save the health plan and its members $1.5 million over three years. We
are well on the way to achieving these projected savings. From the inception of the
renegotiated terms in August 2003, through October 2004, plan costs under the new
contract arrangement were reduced by $637,000.
• In April 2004 the State Employees Wellness Program successfully launched its
first statewide walking program, “Stepping Up for Wellness 2004: Walk
around Vermont”. Nearly 4,000 State employees participated in this
pedometer-based program designed to increase physical activity and
cardiovascular health. Over 50% of the participants finished the 8 week
program, logging over 1.3 billion steps or 656,000 miles, and walking the
equivalent of 1,200 times around the perimeter of the State of Vermont.
Follow-up evaluations from 1,000 program participants reported the
following: 71% increased walking;31% higher energy levels; 25% improved
fitness; 22% weight loss; and 18% stress reduction.
Payroll - 32 VSA §2283(b) states: “The department of human resources shall maintain a
central payroll office which shall be the successor to and continuation of the payroll division
of the department of finance and management.” The law requires that the department be
responsible for fulfilling the payroll functions and for the centralized human resources
management services for State government. We have secured the payroll function and
maximized efficiencies through the following strategies:
► Information Management/Analysis
• This year the FIM Division significantly expanded its role in support of the
labor negotiation process to include very complex compensation and benefit
related analysis and participation in negotiation sessions as required.
• FIM staff created, implemented, and documented the July ‘04 COLA
processing for both classified service and exempt positions and performed
market factor analyses for five different job series throughout the year.
• To assist with the development of quarterly financial reports, premium
projections and rate setting, the FIM Division maintains reporting databases
on the benefit plans. In 2004, we assisted in developing premium rate
analyses for the following employee benefit plans: Medical, Dental, Life, Long
Term Disability, and Employee Assistance Program.
• In addition to responding to a number of surveys from various private and
public organizations this division managed the department’s response to the
national Government Performance Project survey, an extremely detailed and
comprehensive survey requiring responses to approximately 200 items.
• The FIM Division was responsible for preparing the new financial reports for
internal services funds.
• The FY 03 Accrual Accounting Audit by State Auditor (CAFR) was much more
extensive than in previous years.
• The bi-weekly reconciliation of agency funds (holding accounts) was initiated
in 2004 along with a review of cash disposition from prior years.
• To more efficiently manage the department’s limited resources, FIM staff has
been developing a budget/expense tracking system.
► Support the Reorganization of AHS: In the midst of the upgrade, ISD staff
completed all of the system set-up of new coding structures and the transfer of
employees from old departments to the new entities for a July 1, 2004 cutover. This
represented the recoding of nearly half of the workforce within HCM, and the correct
assignment for payroll reporting and processing functions including all end of year
reporting.
► Workforce Planning: For the first time the State has implemented centralized
statewide surveys for new hires and for exiting employees. By June 2004 we had
gathered a full year of data. This information, along with workforce report data, is
being used to help us allocate our staff resources to high priority projects based on
the survey findings, develop appropriate training materials and provide meaningful
feedback to the State leadership team. We have used survey results to help craft
our new Working for the State of Vermont outreach workshop, modify curriculum for
supervisors, and determine which open enrollment training programs to offer. We
are developing an online New Employee Orientation based in part on survey findings
and have targeted our outreach efforts based on these surveys and workforce report
data.
► Aggressively marketing direct deposit and eventually implementing the ePay module
that will enable employees to securely review their earning statements online;
► Restructuring the methods and processes used to report time and expenses. This
will reduce the excessive time spent in handling paper time and expense form
through multiple layers of processing; and
► Conducting the business process review and fit gap analysis in preparation for the
implementation of Time and Labor.
Labor Relations
► Continue to work with State agencies and departments to develop and implement
strategies to further formalize the working relationship between the Department of
Human Resources and field HR staff.
► Fully utilize HCM to track and manage the grievance process throughout State
government.
► Build upon the strong foundation laid by our recent outreach efforts, by continuing to
implement the recommendations outlined in the Department of Human Resources’
2004 Diversity Study.
► Improve our position management process, taking full advantage of the functionality
within HCM. In partnership with the Department of Finance and Management, we
will work to improve the budgeting process by eliminating the need to budget
vacancy savings thereby fully implementing the position pool concept.
► Plan and implement a regular schedule for job classification reviews in an effort to
ensure that positions are properly classified and that as changes are required, the
fiscal impact is minimized.
► Aggressively pursue all necessary steps to position the health plan to receive Federal
subsidies for retiree prescription drug expenditures beginning in 2006. The new
Medicare law implements a voluntary prescription drug benefit (Part D) for over-65
persons. Employers providing actuarially equivalent prescription drug coverage to
► Identify and maximize prescription drug savings over the longer term by re-bidding
the State employees’ prescription drug program prior to the contract’s expiration.
Obtain the most competitive administrative pricing and the most advantageous
financial arrangement for the purchase of prescription drugs for this program.
► Implement business process improvements including but not limited to: (a)
determine feasibility of data comparison of wellness and disease management data
with health and prescription drug claims data; (b) install FootPrints software for the
consistent and efficient tracking of benefit plan customer service; (c) transfer all
benefit plan enrollment and benefit table update functions from Payroll to the
division.
Payroll
► Participate in the design and implementation of a new Time & Labor system to
electronically collect time and expense data from agencies and departments and
eliminate the current heavily paper driven process flow. This process will have a
major impact on every State agency and will require Payroll staff to play a major role
in the implementation process.
Fiscal/Information Management
► Focus on HCM integrity and develop and implement proper quality control
mechanisms and system edits.
► Conduct a needs analysis and assess all management and supervisory training and
the associated costs throughout State government. The goal is to ensure that a
consistent curriculum of the highest quality and most cost effective delivery system
is being implemented.
Highlights:
Section Two
Number of Number of
Department Employees FTEs Department Employees FTEs
Administration 3 3.0 Libraries 35 34.0
Aging & Disabilities 225 215.6 Lieutenant Governor 2 2.0
Agriculture 88 87.3 Liquor Control 55 55.0
Attorney General 70 66.9 Military 111 110.5
Auditor of Accounts 12 12.0 Natural Resources 48 47.5
BISHCA 95 93.4 PATH 417 414.1
Buildings & General Services 402 399.3 Personnel 57 56.2
Child Support Services 124 123.8 Public Safety 514 511.3
Commerce & Community Dev. 97 94.8 Public Service 51 51.0
Corrections 1,106 1,101.3 Public Service Board 25 24.8
Criminal Justice Training Council 8 8.0 Secretary of State 50 50.0
Defender General 65 59.8 Social & Rehabilitation Services 408 399.9
Developmental & MH Services 97 95.5 State Treasurer 33 33.0
Economic Opportunity 6 6.0 State's Attorneys & Sheriffs 159 154.0
Education 184 180.8 Taxes 185 183.1
Employment & Training 291 290.4 Transportation 1,293 1,286.8
Environmental Board 31 30.6 Vermont Commission on Women 3 2.6
Environmental Conservation 268 264.1 Vermont Human Rights Commission 5 4.8
Finance & Management 38 38.0 Vermont Labor Relations Board 2 1.6
Fish & Wildlife 118 118.0 Vermont Lottery Commission 19 19.0
Forest, Parks & Recreation 121 119.0 Vermont State Hospital 181 178.0
Governor's Office 17 16.7 Vermont Veterans' Home 203 194.9
Health 544 496.3 VOSHA Review Board 1 0.5
Human Services 54 53.5 VT Fire Service Training Council 7 7.0
Information and Innovation 51 51.0 Water Resources Board 4 4.0
Labor & Industry 86 85.0
Grand Total 8,069 7,935.3
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include all Executive branch employees (classified and exempt) for
Fiscal Year 2004. This table represents filled positions only. FTEs are “Full-Time Equivalents”.
Comments: At the end of Fiscal Year 2004 there were 8,069 Executive branch employees. A more
accurate picture of staffing level is provided by the 7,935.3 FTE figure. FTEs are “Full-Time Equivalents”.
For purposes of this table, one FTE is based on a full-time employee’s work year of 2,080 hours. To
calculate FTEs for a part-time employee, total authorized hours are divided by 2,080. Thus, a part-time
employee (20 hours per week/1040 hours per year) would equal .5 FTEs. (In this case, the prorate factor
is equal to .5). FTEs shown in this table, and throughout this report, are based on a pro-rate factor
calculated to the nearest tenth.
Number of
County Employees Percent
Addison 135 1.7%
Bennington 389 4.8%
Caledonia 319 4.0%
Chittenden 1,197 14.8%
Essex 24 0.3%
Franklin 344 4.3%
Grand Isle 20 0.2%
Lamoille 100 1.2%
Orange 85 1.1%
Orleans 308 3.8%
Rutland 523 6.5%
Washington 3,865 47.9%
Windham 240 3.0%
Windsor 520 6.4%
Grand Total 8,069 100.0%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include all Executive branch employees (classified and exempt) for
Fiscal Year 2004. A small percentage of employees are “home-based” and their work location of record is their home county,
although they may travel to other areas in the state to perform their job duties.
Comments: Executive branch employees work in every county in the state. Nearly 50% (3,865) work in
Washington County (Montpelier and Waterbury complexes).
1600
17.86%
1400
16.17%
14.76%
1200 14.46%
12.43%
Number of Employees
1000
800 9.28%
600
6.46%
5.68%
400
200 1.74%
1.14%
0.02%
0
<20 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-65 >65
Age Group
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include all Executive branch employees (classified and exempt) for
Fiscal Year 2004.
Comments: The largest group of Executive branch employees (17.86%) was age 50-54, closely followed
by the 45-49 age group (16.17%). The average employee age at the end of Fiscal Year 2004 was 45.7
years.
Benchmarking
New England State Governments – Average Age
Connecticut 46.6
Massachusetts 45.2
Maine 46.6
New Hampshire 45.0
Vermont 45.7
Source: Connecticut Department of Administrative Services (FY ’04); Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, Human Resources Division (FY ’04); New Hampshire, Division of Personnel
2003 Annual Report (FY ’03); Maine, Bureau of Human Resources (FY ’04).
3000
30.5%
2500
28.3%
2000
Number of Employees
19.6%
1500
1000
9.1%
500 5.2%
4.3%
2.7%
0.4%
0
<$15,000 $15,000- $25,000- $35,000- $45,000- $55,000- $65,000- >$75,000
$25,000 $35,000 $45,000 $55,000 $65,000 $75,000
Annual Salary
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include all Executive branch employees (classified and exempt) for
Fiscal Year 2004. Annual salary is base rate actually paid and does not include benefits or any overtime.
Comments: The largest percentage of Executive branch employees (30.5%) earned between $35,000
and $45,000 in annual salary.
The average salary for all Executive branch employees (classified and exempt) was $42,018. When
considering only classified employees, the average salary was $41,040 (See Table 29).
3000
30.6%
2500
2000
Number of Employees
18.2%
1500
14.7%
12.2%
1000
9.1% 8.6%
500 4.7%
1.6%
0.3%
0
<5 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-40 >40
Years of Service
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include all Executive branch employees (classified and exempt) for
Fiscal Year 2004.
Comments: The largest percentage of employees (30.6%) had less than five year’s service. The
average length of service of Executive branch employees was 12.3 years
Benchmarking
New England State Governments – Average Years of Service
Connecticut 13.2
Massachusetts 13.9
Maine 16.9
New Hampshire 09.3
Vermont 12.3
Source: Connecticut Department of Administrative Services (FY ’04); Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, Human Resources Division (FY ’04); New Hampshire, Division of Personnel
2003 Annual Report (FY ’03); Maine, Bureau of Human Resources (FY ’04).
Female
48.2% Minority
1.8%
Male
51.8%
American
Indian/Alaskan
Native (34%)
Hispanic (29%)
Black (21%)
Asian/Pacific
Islander (16%)
White
98.2%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include all Executive branch employees (classified and exempt) for
Fiscal Year 2004.
Comments: Of the population of Executive branch employees, 4,178 or 51.8% were male and 3,891 or
48.2% were female.
Minority employees made up 1.8% of the workforce. Of the State of Vermont’s 145 minority employees,
34% identified themselves as American Indian/Alaskan Native, 29% Hispanic, 21% Black, and 16%
Asian/Pacific Islander.
Benchmarking
New England State Governments – Gender and Ethnic Representation
Supervisory Management
10.0% 5.4%
Exempt
Non- 7.0%
Management
84.6%
Classified
93.0%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include all Executive branch employees (classified and exempt) for
Fiscal Year 2004.
Comments: Nearly sixteen percent (1,239) of Executive branch employees have a supervisory or
management designation. This amounts to approximately a 1 to 5.5 ratio of supervisors and managers to
non-supervisory employees. Exempt employees made up 7% (564) of the workforce.
Supervisory Corrections
9% 11% Excluded from BU
State Police 13%
4%
Non-Management
63%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include all Executive branch employees (classified and exempt) for
Fiscal Year 2004. Excluded from BU are employees who are excluded from participation in a bargaining unit and include exempt
employees, and classified confidential and managerial employees.
Comments: A total of 7,016 or 87%, of Executive branch employees are covered by one of the four
bargaining units – State Police (298), Supervisory (758), Corrections (878), and the largest, Non-
Management (5,082).
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include all Executive branch employees (classified and exempt) for
Fiscal Year 2004. Occupational categories are based on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s occupational categories for
state and local government (EEO-4). Appendix A gives a full definition of each category.
Comments: Over half (50.6%) of Executive branch employees are in jobs categorized as Professional.
Paraprofessional (2.8%) and Service Maintenance (2.5%) categories have the smallest percentage of
employees.
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data only include classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Year 2004.
Comments: Of the 1,475 classified job titles that were on record at the end of Fiscal Year 2004, the
most populous was Correctional Officer I (330 employees). More than 21% of the classified workforce
was employed in one of the top ten most populous job titles. However, of the 1,475 classified job titles
the majority, 863 (58.5%), had a single incumbent.
Employment
Turnover
Compensation
Diversity
Leave Usage
Section Three
State of Vermont Workforce Report – FY 2004 31
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Highlights:
• During Fiscal Year 2004 there were 596 hires for a hire
rate of 7.9% of the workforce. 53.2% of hires were male
and 1.8% were ethnic minorities.
Workforce
Trends
State of Vermont Workforce Report – FY 2004 33
Table 11 Number of Classified Employees and FTEs by Fiscal Year
7800
7600 7505
(2.4%)
7389.5
7326 (2.5%)
7400 (1.0%)
7250
(2.2%) 7206.5
(1.2%)
7096 7122.0
7200 (2.3%)
(2.3%)
6962.9
7000 (2.3%)
6937
6807.4
6800
6600
6400
6200
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Fiscal Year
Number FTEs
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. FTEs are “Full-Time Equivalents”. The percentages noted in parentheses above the bars reflect the percent
change from the previous fiscal year.
Comments: For Fiscal Year 2004 there were a total of 7,505 classified employees and 7,389.5 FTEs.
This represents an increase from Fiscal Year 2003 in both number of employees (2.4%) and FTEs (2.5%).
From FY 2000 to FY 2004 the classified workforce has grown at an average rate of about 2.0% per year.
% Change
Department FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 00 to FY 04
Num.
Num.
Num.
Num.
Num.
FTEs
FTEs
FTEs
FTEs
FTEs
Num. FTEs
Aging & Disabilities 181 174.1 193 183.8 201 192.8 207 198.0 221 211.6 22.1% 21.5%
Agriculture 81 79.9 80 78.9 81 79.8 80 78.9 83 82.3 2.5% 3.0%
Attorney General 27 26.0 23 22.0 29 27.3 29 28.3 28 27.8 3.7% 6.9%
BISHCA 71 70.8 70 68.4 72 70.1 76 74.9 78 76.4 9.9% 7.9%
Buildings & General Services 367 366.8 386 385.3 416 415.2 420 419.9 396 394.3 7.9% 7.5%
Child Support Services 111 110.6 111 110.0 111 111.0 111 110.8 115 114.8 3.6% 3.8%
Commerce & Community Dev. 79 76.9 85 82.2 83 79.8 80 78.3 79 76.8 0.0% -0.1%
Corrections 927 920.2 936 931.8 966 960.0 973 967.1 1098 1093.3 18.4% 18.8%
Developmental & MH Services 93 92.8 97 96.8 98 97.8 96 95.1 89 88.8 -4.3% -4.3%
Education 143 136.3 163 158.4 179 174.8 174 171.1 177 173.8 23.8% 27.6%
Employment & Training 351 347.5 324 322.1 320 318.5 318 315.9 285 284.6 -18.8% -18.1%
Environmental Board 27 25.3 28 27.2 27 26.5 26 25.6 26 25.6 -3.7% 1.2%
Environmental Conservation 257 253.1 264 258.9 257 251.2 257 252.7 261 257.8 1.6% 1.9%
Finance & Management 30 30.0 25 25.0 33 33.0 31 31.0 35 35.0 16.7% 16.7%
Fish & Wildlife 118 117.8 115 114.8 114 114.0 118 118.0 114 114.0 -3.4% -3.2%
Forest, Parks & Recreation 117 116.4 120 119.0 117 116.0 115 114.0 119 117.0 1.7% 0.5%
Health 477 435.6 514 462.5 517 466.7 537 488.6 539 491.3 13.0% 12.8%
Human Services 61 57.2 53 48.3 55 52.5 45 44.3 47 46.5 -23.0% -18.6%
Information and Innovation 49 49.0 n/a n/a
Labor & Industry 75 74.0 72 71.0 76 75.5 78 77.0 79 78.0 5.3% 5.4%
Libraries 36 34.5 33 32.0 31 30.5 33 32.0 33 32.0 -8.3% -7.2%
Liquor Control 51 51.0 53 53.0 54 54.0 52 52.0 53 53.0 3.9% 3.9%
Military 88 86.8 99 97.8 108 107.0 106 105.3 107 106.5 21.6% 22.7%
Natural Resources 34 33.1 30 29.1 29 28.0 40 39.5 39 38.5 14.7% 16.2%
PATH 397 390.8 415 409.2 421 415.1 410 406.3 410 407.1 3.3% 4.2%
Personnel 48 45.8 48 47.0 53 50.8 51 49.4 52 51.2 8.3% 11.8%
Public Safety 459 456.6 489 486.6 489 486.6 480 477.6 508 505.3 10.7% 10.7%
Public Service 38 37.9 37 36.9 37 37.0 38 38.0 37 37.0 -2.6% -2.5%
Secretary of State 41 41.0 40 40.0 38 38.0 38 38.0 41 41.0 0.0% 0.0%
Small Departments 44 43.6 44 43.6 43 42.0 43 42.5 35 34.4 -20.5% -21.0%
Social & Rehabilitation Services 379 367.8 378 369.3 393 385.1 385 376.5 394 386.2 4.0% 5.0%
State Treasurer 26 26.0 26 26.0 26 25.8 26 26.0 29 29.0 11.5% 11.5%
Taxes 174 171.6 176 173.1 180 177.6 175 172.1 174 172.1 0.0% 0.3%
Transportation 1178 1173.3 1221 1215.9 1228 1221.9 1271 1266.0 1276 1269.8 8.3% 8.2%
Vermont Lottery Commission 18 18.0 19 19.0 18 18.0 18 18.0 18 18.0 0.0% 0.0%
Vermont State Hospital 152 150.2 158 155.9 155 152.4 180 176.7 181 178.0 19.1% 18.5%
Vermont Veterans' Home 181 168.4 171 162.2 195 189.7 209 201.4 200 191.9 10.5% 13.9%
Grand Total 6937 6807.4 7096 6962.9 7250 7122.0 7326 7206.5 7505 7389.5 8.2% 8.6%
% Increase from Previous FY 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.3% 1.0% 1.2% 2.4% 2.5%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See Appendix B). FTEs are “Full-Time Equivalents”.
Comments: Departments that have experienced the highest percentage growth in numbers of
employees from FY 2000 to FY 2004 include Education (+23.8%), Aging & Disabilities (+22.1%), Military
(+21.6%), Vermont State Hospital (+19.1%), and Corrections (+18.4%). Departments with the largest
percentage declines include Human Services (-23.0%) and Employment & Training (-18.8%).
%
Occupational Group Fiscal Year Change
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 FY 00 to
Num. % Num. % Num. % Num. % Num. % FY 04
Office/Clerical 1,110 16% 1,052 15% 960 13% 898 12% 831 11% -25.1%
Officials and Administrators 297 4% 304 4% 319 4% 332 5% 326 4% 9.8%
Paraprofessionals 166 2% 163 2% 174 2% 192 3% 224 3% 34.9%
Professionals 3,053 44% 3,232 46% 3,544 49% 3,658 50% 3,768 50% 23.4%
Protective Service 822 12% 900 13% 907 13% 891 12% 997 13% 21.3%
Service Maintenance 384 6% 391 6% 210 3% 211 3% 205 3% -46.6%
Skilled Craft 319 5% 339 5% 556 8% 562 8% 569 8% 78.4%
Technicians 786 11% 715 10% 580 8% 582 8% 585 8% -25.6%
Grand Total 6,937 100% 7,096 100% 7,250 100% 7,326 100% 7,505 100% 8.2%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. Occupational categories are based on the Equal Opportunity Commission’s occupational categories for state and
local government (EEO-4). Appendix A gives a full definition of each category.
Comments: There has been a steady decline in the number of employees categorized as Service
Maintenance (-46.6%), Technicians (-25.6%) and Office/Clerical (-25.1) from FY 2000 to FY 2004.
During the same time period there as been steady growth in the Professional occupational category not
only in terms of numbers of employees (+23.4%) but also as a percent of the workforce (from 44% to
50%).
25000
22,491
(38.9%)
20000
15000 16,191
Number
10000
8,996
(41.0%)
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include both internal and external applicants for classified jobs who
applied through the centralized Department of Personnel for Fiscal Years 2003 and 2004. This analysis does not include departments
with decentralized recruitment authority or agency only recruitments. This information was voluntarily submitted by applicants as
part of the application process. Not included in the analysis of applicant characteristics were 1,013 applicants who did not report
their ethnic status; 396 who did not report their gender; and 502 who did not report their age.
Comments: In Fiscal Year 2004, 8,996 applicants submitted 22,491 applications for classified jobs with
the State of Vermont (average of 2.5 applications per applicant). This represents an increase of 38.9% in
applications submitted and 41.0% in applicants over Fiscal Year 2003. This increase is largely attributable
to the introduction of an online job application system in February of 2003, as well as increased marketing
and outreach efforts.
For Fiscal Year 2004 the average age of applicants was 38.5. Most applicants (55.0%) were female. Of
the 7,983 applicants who provided valid ethnic status information, 95.2% were white, while 4.8% were
ethnic minorities.
Percent Male
Percent Male
Workforce
Workforce
Minority
Minority
Percent
Percent
Percent
Percent
Female
Female
Hires
Hires
Rate
Rate
Aging & Disabilities 15 207 7.2% 0.0% 73.3% 26.7% 16 221 7.2% 0.0% 68.8% 31.3%
Agriculture 5 80 6.3% 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 7 83 8.4% 0.0% 57.1% 42.9%
Attorney General 1 29 3.4% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 2 28 7.1% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
BISHCA 5 76 6.6% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0% 4 78 5.1% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Buildings & General Services 25 420 6.0% 4.0% 24.0% 76.0% 34 396 8.6% 2.9% 23.5% 76.5%
Child Support Services 1 111 0.9% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 1 115 0.9% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Commerce & Community Dev. 3 80 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 2 79 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Corrections 54 973 5.5% 1.9% 33.3% 66.7% 171 1098 15.6% 3.5% 31.0% 69.0%
Developmental & MH Services 1 96 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0 89 0.0% n/a n/a n/a
Education 11 174 6.3% 0.0% 45.5% 54.5% 15 177 8.5% 0.0% 46.7% 53.3%
Employment & Training 12 318 3.8% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3% 12 285 4.2% 8.3% 50.0% 50.0%
Environmental Board 0 26 0.0% n/a n/a n/a 0 26 0.0% n/a n/a n/a
Environmental Conservation 15 257 5.8% 0.0% 53.3% 46.7% 13 261 5.0% 0.0% 46.2% 53.8%
Finance & Management 1 31 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 5 35 14.3% 0.0% 40.0% 60.0%
Fish & Wildlife 6 118 5.1% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 4 114 3.5% 0.0% 25.0% 75.0%
Forest, Parks & Recreation 1 115 0.9% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 1 119 0.8% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Health 41 537 7.6% 0.0% 70.7% 29.3% 30 539 5.6% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Human Services 2 45 4.4% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 1 47 2.1% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Information and Innovation 3 49 6.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Labor & Industry 5 78 6.4% 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 4 79 5.1% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Libraries 4 33 12.1% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0% 1 33 3.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Liquor Control 1 52 1.9% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0 53 0.0% n/a n/a n/a
Military 6 106 5.7% 16.7% 33.3% 66.7% 7 107 6.5% 0.0% 14.3% 85.7%
Natural Resources 2 40 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 1 39 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
PATH 14 410 3.4% 7.1% 78.6% 21.4% 26 410 6.3% 0.0% 73.1% 26.9%
Personnel 1 51 2.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 7 52 13.5% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Public Safety 28 480 5.8% 0.0% 32.1% 67.9% 65 508 12.8% 1.5% 27.7% 72.3%
Public Service 6 38 15.8% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3% 2 37 5.4% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Secretary of State 5 38 13.2% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0% 3 41 7.3% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Small Departments 2 43 4.7% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 2 35 5.7% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Social & Rehabilitation Services 23 385 6.0% 8.7% 69.6% 30.4% 30 394 7.6% 0.0% 70.0% 30.0%
State Treasurer 2 26 7.7% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 5 29 17.2% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Taxes 2 175 1.1% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 8 174 4.6% 0.0% 62.5% 37.5%
Transportation 91 1271 7.2% 3.3% 33.0% 67.0% 73 1276 5.7% 1.4% 42.5% 57.5%
Vermont Lottery Commission 2 18 11.1% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 2 18 11.1% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Vermont State Hospital 12 180 6.7% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3% 11 181 6.1% 9.1% 81.8% 18.2%
Vermont Veterans' Home 43 209 20.6% 0.0% 95.3% 4.7% 28 200 14.0% 0.0% 89.3% 10.7%
Grand Total 448 7326 6.1% 2.0% 52.2% 47.8% 596 7505 7.9% 1.8% 46.8% 53.2%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include new hires and rehires for classified positions in the
Executive branch. “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See Appendix B).
Comments: For FY 2004 there were 596 new hires for a hire rate of 7.9% of the workforce. This
represents a 33.0% increase over FY 2003. Ethnic minorities made up 1.8% of new hires and gender
representation was 46.8% female and 53% male.
Note: Respondents were asked to choose up to three "most important" reasons. The
percent represents the number of respondents who indicated that statement as one
of their reasons.
Source: New Hire Survey Results and Analysis – Fiscal Year 2004. Surveys were sent to 474 new hires into classified jobs during FY
2004. A total of 211 responded for a response rate of 44.5%. The sample was 55.5% female and 44.1% male; 3.7% indicated they
were an ethnic minority.
Comments: The vast majority (52.1%) of new hires first learned of the job opportunity that they
eventually accepted from the Department of Personnel web site. Other significant sources included
referrals from current employees (14.2%) and a friend or relative (11.8%), as well as a newspaper ad
(13.3% - this percentage is must be interpreted carefully because only a small fraction of vacancies are
advertised in the newspaper).
Most applicants were employed in the private sector and were only casually looking for a new job
opportunity. The average age was 40 and most (58%) had a Bachelor’s degree of higher. The most
important reason cited for accepting employment with the State of Vermont was “seeking better benefits”
(29.3%), followed closely by “desire to make better use of my knowledge & skills” (25.5%) and “looking
for greater job security” (23.4%).
The employment “brand” – the perception applicants have of the State of Vermont as an employer - was
overall very positive. Over 90% agreed or strongly agreed that attributes such as “greater job security”,
“work that makes a difference”, “career opportunities”, “excellent benefits”, and “diversity” came to mind
when they thought of the State of Vermont as an employer.
Highlights:
Workforce
Trends
12.0%
10.0%
9.8%
8.9%
8.0%
8.0% 8.2%
Turnover Rate
7.3%
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Fiscal Year
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. Movement between state departments is not considered as turnover for purposes of this analysis. Turnover is
calculated by using the actual number of separations from state government divided by the average number of employees for the
fiscal year.
Comments: The turnover rate rose from Fiscal Year 2000 to a high of 9.8% in Fiscal Year 2001.
Turnover in Fiscal Year 2004 rose to 8.2% after two years of declines to a five year low of 7.3% for Fiscal
Year 2003. The five year average for turnover is 8.4%.
Turnover in the State of Vermont’s classified workforce is not high in relation to many standards. Data
from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that total annual government
turnover (Federal, state and local) to be 14.7% (9/03 to 8/04). In contrast, total private industry annual
turnover was 41.4% (9/03 to 8/04).
Benchmarking
New England State Governments – Turnover
Connecticut 05.6%
Massachusetts 11.3%
Maine 07.1%
New Hampshire 09.4%
Vermont 08.2%
Source: Connecticut Department of Administrative Services (FY ’04); Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, Human Resources Division (FY ’04); New Hampshire, Division of Personnel 2003
Annual Report (FY ’03); Maine, Bureau of Human Resources (FY ’04).
Five Year
Department FY2000 FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 Average
Aging & Disabilities 6.1% 7.7% 10.4% 9.5% 4.3% 7.6%
Agriculture 3.9% 5.2% 7.9% 7.8% 8.1% 6.5%
Attorney General 9.5% 36.4% 8.9% 3.7% 15.4% 14.3%
BISHCA 12.1% 14.8% 13.3% 4.3% 6.7% 10.1%
Buildings & General Services 10.1% 13.6% 11.5% 8.8% 9.6% 10.7%
Child Support Services 8.2% 8.2% 6.4% 0.9% 1.8% 5.0%
Commerce & Community Development 10.9% 5.3% 5.2% 6.7% 6.7% 6.9%
Corrections 9.6% 12.6% 9.3% 8.8% 14.4% 11.0%
Education 10.8% 13.2% 5.7% 5.3% 7.7% 8.2%
Employment & Training 5.8% 8.8% 10.0% 4.5% 10.9% 8.0%
Environmental Board 5.0% 9.5% 0.0% 4.3% 4.3% 4.5%
Environmental Conservation 2.1% 4.1% 4.9% 3.4% 2.9% 3.5%
Finance & Management 3.9% 32.1% 4.1% 6.2% 3.0% 9.7%
Fish & Wildlife 2.6% 4.3% 8.0% 6.2% 4.3% 5.0%
Forest, Parks & Recreation 2.7% 4.5% 5.3% 8.3% 2.7% 4.7%
Health 8.3% 12.9% 7.5% 7.4% 5.6% 8.2%
Human Services 3.8% 5.5% 2.1% 10.3% 7.1% 5.7%
Information & Innovation 4.0% n/a
Labor & Industry 5.6% 11.3% 7.3% 3.9% 5.2% 6.6%
Libraries 0.0% 6.0% 3.2% 6.5% 3.2% 3.8%
Liquor Control 6.1% 9.8% 13.2% 3.7% 1.9% 7.0%
Mental Health 3.5% 8.8% 1.0% 7.4% 5.5% 5.2%
Military 8.3% 14.8% 5.1% 7.6% 7.7% 8.6%
Natural Resources 0.0% 3.1% 3.6% 3.6% 2.6% 2.6%
PATH 3.2% 5.5% 5.0% 5.5% 6.5% 5.2%
Personnel 4.4% 7.0% 8.6% 12.9% 10.2% 8.7%
Public Safety 11.3% 10.1% 10.2% 10.2% 8.6% 10.1%
Public Service 2.8% 14.1% 8.5% 13.3% 2.6% 8.2%
Secretary of State 8.0% 9.8% 20.3% 7.7% 2.6% 9.7%
Small Departments 10.4% 9.4% 11.6% 4.9% 8.7% 9.0%
Social & Rehabilitation Services 11.1% 7.0% 11.9% 7.0% 8.7% 9.1%
State Treasurer 8.0% 3.7% 3.7% 16.7% 7.3% 7.7%
Tax 5.6% 4.8% 2.4% 3.5% 4.8% 4.2%
Transportation 8.4% 8.4% 7.7% 5.9% 6.5% 7.4%
Vermont Lottery Commission 11.8% 0.0% 5.4% 11.1% 0.0% 5.4%
Vermont State Hospital 10.3% 11.3% 15.5% 12.2% 10.0% 11.8%
Vermont Veterans' Home 19.6% 24.1% 31.2% 16.7% 20.4% 22.3%
Grand Total 8.0% 9.8% 8.9% 7.3% 8.2% 8.4%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See Appendix B). Movement between state departments is
not considered as turnover for purposes of this analysis. Turnover is calculated by using the actual number of separations from state
government divided by the average number of employees for the fiscal year.
Comments: Over this five fiscal year timeframe the highest turnover has been at the Vermont Veteran’s
Home with average yearly turnover of 22.3%.
Five Year
Occupational Group FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 Average
Office/Clerical 8.9% 10.4% 7.7% 7.3% 7.8% 8.5%
Officials and Administrators 5.9% 5.1% 5.6% 7.2% 8.5% 6.5%
Paraprofessionals 23.0% 19.8% 27.3% 20.3% 18.4% 21.7%
Professionals 6.6% 9.2% 7.5% 5.8% 5.9% 6.9%
Protective Service 10.8% 13.0% 11.6% 10.1% 16.7% 12.5%
Service Maintenance 12.0% 14.6% 9.8% 15.2% 17.6% 13.2%
Skilled Craft 6.9% 7.5% 13.2% 4.9% 5.0% 6.9%
Technicians 5.3% 6.0% 7.5% 8.0% 5.3% 6.4%
Grand Total 8.0% 9.8% 8.9% 7.3% 8.2% 8.4%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. Occupational categories are based on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s occupational categories
for state and local government (EEO-4). Appendix A gives a full definition of each category. Movement between state departments
is not considered as turnover for purposes of this analysis. Turnover is calculated by using the actual number of separations from
state government divided by the average number of employees for the fiscal year.
Comments: Over the five fiscal year period the highest turnover has consistently been in the
Paraprofessional occupational group with average yearly turnover of 21.7%. This group includes such job
titles as Psychiatric Technician and Licensed Nursing Assistant.
Turnover of Most Populous Job Titles FY '04 Job Titles with the Highest Turnover Rate FY '04
Employees
Employees
Number of
Number of
Turnover
Turnover
Job Title Job Title
Correctional Officer I 291 35.0% Trooper 2/C - Recruit 20 69.6%
AOT Maintenance Worker IV 199 7.4% Correctional Officer I 291 35.0%
Administrative Assistant A 159 5.6% Licensed Nursing Assistant 68 32.9%
Program Services Clerk 143 9.2% BGS Security Worker 12 30.0%
Social Worker B 131 9.1% Psychiatric Technician II 10 26.1%
Corrections Services Specialist II 128 3.1% Veterans Home LPN Charge Nurse 16 22.9%
Benefits Programs Specialist 114 7.8% Employer Resource Consultant 12 22.2%
Administrative Assistant B 110 9.9% Education Programs Coordinator I 14 21.4%
Correctional Officer II 105 10.0% Social Worker C 10 20.0%
Systems Developer II 93 3.3% Emergency Communications Dispatcher 61 19.7%
Senior Trooper - Station 92 4.3% Systems Developer III 31 19.0%
Custodian I 72 18.8% Custodian I 72 18.8%
Sergeant 69 9.7% Custodian II 15 18.8%
Licensed Nursing Assistant 68 32.9% AOT Maintenance Worker III 10 18.2%
AOT Senior Maintenance Worker 67 2.9% E&T District Manager 10 18.2%
Reach Up Case Manager 66 1.5% Public Health Specialist 13 15.4%
Environmental Analyst III - General 65 3.1% Data Clerk - Typist 14 14.3%
Emergency Communications Dispatcher 61 19.7% Civil Engineer II 13 14.3%
Administrative Secretary 60 4.9% Education Consultant I 28 13.6%
Motor Vehicle Customer Services Specialist 58 7.0% Secretary C 38 13.2%
Trooper 1/C - Station 56 5.7% Account Clerk B 17 12.9%
Community Correctional Officer 54 1.9% UC Customer Service Representative 16 12.9%
Public Health Nurse III 52 7.5% Information Center Representative II 33 11.6%
AOT Technician IV 51 5.8% Motor Vehicle Document Clerk I 10 11.1%
Information Technology Specialist II 47 0.0% Corrections Services Specialist I 41 10.8%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Year 2004. Movement between state departments is not considered as turnover for purposes of this analysis. Turnover is calculated
by using the actual number of separations from state government divided by the average number of employees for the fiscal year.
Comments: For Fiscal Year 2004 this table shows the turnover rates of the 25 most populous job titles,
as well as the 25 classified job titles (with greater than 10 employees) with the highest turnover.
Correctional Officer I was the most populous job title and also showed a high rate of turnover (35.0%).
This rate is over twice that of Fiscal Year 2003 turnover for Correctional Officer (15.6%). Most populous
job titles that showed low rates of turnover included Administrative Assistant B (5.6%), Corrections
Services Specialist II (3.1%), Systems Developer II (3.3%), and Senior Trooper – Station (4.3%).
The job title with the highest rate of turnover was Trooper 2/C – Recruit at 69.6%. This is the entry level
training job class for the Vermont State Police and a high rate of turnover is not unusual.
Other job titles with high rates of turnover include Licensed Nursing Assistants (Vermont Veteran’s Home)
at 32.9%, BGS Security Worker at 30.0%, and Psychiatric Technician II at 26.1%
500
450
439
400
350 369
344
Number of Employees
300 322
318
250
200
150
155 154
150
138 131
100
50 78 79
53 59 56
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Fiscal Year
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. Movement between state departments is not considered as turnover for purposes of this analysis. Turnover is
calculated by using the actual number of separations from state government divided by the average number of employees for the
fiscal year.
Comments: The largest number of separations were voluntary terminations, which at 344 was up by
6.8% over FY 2003. After a one year decline in FY 2003, the number of retirements rose to 154 in FY
2004 (+17.6% over FY 2003).). The largest percent increase was in involuntary terminations which rose
41.1% from FY 2003. Two job classes accounted for almost half of the involuntary terminations –
Correctional Officer I (32%) and Licensed Nursing Assistant (13%).
Of the turnover in Fiscal Year 2004, 60% were voluntary terminations, 27% were retirements, and 14%
involuntary terminations.
Turnover Definitions
0-5 Years
(70.9%)
>20 Years
(2.5%)
16-20 Years
(3.6%)
First Year
11-15 Years (32.0%)
(8.9%)
Second Year
(16.6%)
Third Year
(10.8%)
6-10 Years
(14.1%) Fourth Year
(7.3%)
Fifth Year
(4.2%)
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. Movement between state departments is not considered as turnover for purposes of this analysis. Voluntary
turnover includes voluntary resignations and end of limited term or interim appointments.
Comments: From Fiscal Year 2000 to Fiscal Year 2004 the vast majority of voluntary terminations (five
year average 70.9%) occurred among employees with five or fewer years of service. When considering
those employees who voluntarily terminated in the first five years the largest percentage occurred in the
first year of employment (five year average 32.0%).
Level of Satisfaction
Of Exit Survey Respondents…
● 58% voluntarily terminated with two years or less of
Employment
service 49.3%
experience? 11.5%
● While 68.8% had accepted another job, 31.3% had not
been re-employed at the time they responded to the
survey The Leadership
22.7%
● The average age was 39. of Dept?
10.6%
Your
33.3% 34.8%
Coworkers?
Note: Respondents were asked to choose up to three "most Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied
important" reasons. The percent represents the number of
respondents who indicated that statement as one of their
reasons.
Source: Exit Hire Survey Results and Analysis – Fiscal Year 2004. Surveys were sent to 191 classified employees who voluntarily
terminated during FY 2004. A total of 67 responded for a response rate of 35.1%. The sample was 52.2% female and 44.8% male;
6.0% indicated they were an ethnic minority.
Comments: Exit survey results – employees who voluntarily terminated during Fiscal Year 2004 – show
that the most important reason influencing employees’ decision to voluntarily leave employment was
“workplace conflicts/tension/poor morale” (38.8%), followed by “problems with immediate supervisor”
(23.9) and “family circumstances” (22.4%).
Terminating employees left either satisfied or very satisfied with their “employment experience” (60.8%),
“your coworkers” (68.1%) and “your job” (58.2%). Satisfaction with “the leadership of department” was
the lowest at 33.3%.
Even among terminating employees the perception of the State of Vermont as an employer was overall
relatively positive. Over 60% agreed or strongly agreed that they thought of attributes such as “excellent
benefits”, “work that makes a difference”, “career opportunities”, “greater job security” and “work/family
flexibility” when considering the State of Vermont as an employer.
Highlights:
Workforce
Trends
45.8
45.6
45.6
45.4 45.5
45.2
Average Age
45 45.1
44.8
44.8
44.6
44.5
44.4
44.2
44
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Fiscal Year
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004.
Comments: The average age of classified employees has been steadily rising over the five-year time
period from an average of 44.5 years in Fiscal Year 2000 to an average of 45.6 years in Fiscal Year 2004.
Benchmarking
New England State Governments – Average Age
Connecticut 46.6
Massachusetts 45.2
Maine 46.6
New Hampshire 45.0
Vermont 45.6
Source: Connecticut Department of Administrative Services (FY ’04); Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, Human Resources Division (FY ’04); New Hampshire, Division of Personnel
2003 Annual Report (FY ’03); Maine, Bureau of Human Resources (FY ’04).
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Year 2004. “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See Appendix B).
Comments: Departments with the highest average age include Libraries (53.9) and Taxes (49.3).
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Year 2004. . “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See Appendix B).
Comments: The average length of service for classified employees was 12.5 years. Departments with
high average length of service include Forest, Parks & Recreation (19.2), Libraries (16.7) and Employment
& Training (16.4).
Projected Eligible
Five Year Ten Year
Cumulative Cumulative
Eligible Projected Projected
Occupational Group FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Eligible Eligible
Office/Clerical 10.1% 1.9% 3.7% 3.9% 3.1% 5.3% 28.0% 44.9%
Officials and Administrators 25.8% 4.9% 7.7% 2.8% 6.1% 6.1% 53.4% 74.2%
Paraprofessionals 3.6% 0.9% 1.8% 1.3% 1.3% 2.2% 11.2% 29.0%
Professionals 10.0% 3.1% 3.3% 2.9% 4.4% 4.7% 28.4% 46.5%
Protective Service 3.2% 0.8% 0.7% 0.5% 1.8% 1.5% 7.4% 18.8%
Service Maintenance 9.3% 2.9% 1.5% 4.4% 5.4% 2.4% 25.9% 37.1%
Skilled Craft 9.3% 2.6% 2.6% 3.5% 3.0% 4.4% 25.5% 46.4%
Technicians 9.9% 2.4% 2.4% 3.1% 2.9% 4.6% 25.3% 42.6%
Total 9.7% 2.7% 3.1% 2.7% 3.7% 4.2% 25.6% 42.7%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Year 2004. Retirement eligibility was determined if at the end of Fiscal Year 2004 the employee met one of the following conditions:
(1) Five or more years of service (vested) and age 62; or (2) 30 years of service. These are the criteria for “Group F” retirement
members, which include almost all classified employees. Some law enforcement employees have different eligibility criteria (“Group
C”) and for these employees eligibility was based on five or more years of service (vested) and age 55. Finally, according to the
Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Vermont State Employees’ Retirement System Prepared as of June 30, 2004, there are a
small number (33) of employees who remain in “Category A”, which has slightly different criteria for eligibility. For purposes of this
analysis these employees could not be identified so have been included under the “Group F” eligibility criteria. Numbers for each
year do not carry over to the next year. Projections are based on employee’s age and length of service at Fiscal 2004 year-end.
Comments: At the end of Fiscal Year 2004, 9.7% of the classified workforce met eligibility criteria for
normal retirement. Over a quarter of employees in the Officials and Administrators occupational group
are currently eligible for retirement.
The five-year projection shows that overall an additional 2.7% of employees becoming eligible in Fiscal
Year 2005. The projections show the percentage generally rising each year to 4.2% in Fiscal Year 2009.
By Fiscal Year 2009, 25.6% of the current workforce is projected to be retirement eligible. Perhaps most
striking is that over one-half of the classified managers and administrators in state government (Officials
and Administrators) will be eligible for retirement in five years.
The ten year projection to Fiscal Year 2014 shows that nearly one-half (43%) of the Fiscal Year 2004
workforce will be retirement eligible.
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Year 2004. “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See Appendix B). Please see Table 25 for a description of the
method used to produce the retirement projections.
Comments: Departments that currently have 20% or more of their classified workforce retirement
eligible include Forest, Parks & Recreation and Taxes. Departments that are projected to have significant
levels of retirement eligible employees in five years include Libraries (45.5%), Employment & Training
(43.5%), Forest, Parks & Recreation (42.9%), and Finance & Management (42.9%).
54 State of Vermont Workforce Report – FY 2004
Compensation
Highlights:
Workforce
Trends
$42,000
$41,000
$41,040
(2.4%)
$40,000
$40,073
(5.1%)
$39,000
$38,000
Average Salary
$38,123
(6.7%)
$37,000
$36,000
$35,719
$35,000 (5.0%)
$34,000
$34,014
$33,000
$32,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Fiscal Year
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. Annual salary is base rate actually paid and does not include benefits or any overtime.
Comments: For Fiscal Year 2004 the average salary for classified employees was $41,040, a 2.4%
increase over the Fiscal Year 2003 average. Several factors contribute to change in average annual
salary. Many employees are eligible for step movement within the pay plan each year. Cost of Living
Adjustments (COLAs) are based on collective bargaining agreements (See box below). In addition,
classification actions and promotions, higher paid employees retiring and newly hired employees coming in
lower on the pay scale all affect average salary. The percentages noted in parentheses reflect the percent
change from the previous year.
2002 6.48% (includes 1.98% for steps; 3% value of $.50/hour in July ’01;
1.5% value of $.25/hour in January ’02)
Technicians $36,465
Professionals $45,420
Paraprofessionals $30,105
Office/Clerical $30,310
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Year 2004. Occupational categories are based on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s occupational categories for state
and local government (EEO-4). Appendix A gives a full definition of each category.
Comments: Of the eight occupational categories those employees in the Service Maintenance category
had the lowest average salary at $24,263 while those employees categorized as Official & Administrators
had the highest average at $67,463.
% Change
Department FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY03 to FY04
Aging & Disabilities $15,361 $16,099 $16,600 $22,756 $29,875 31.3%
Agriculture $24,512 $5,961 $17,216 $4,073 $9,043 122.0%
Attorney General $2,826 $3,475 $3,019 $4,711 $3,838 -18.5%
Banking, Insurance & Securities $25,299 $31,749 $19,873 $26,929 $30,284 12.5%
Buildings & General Services $456,963 $547,671 $582,894 $519,507 $488,305 -6.0%
Child Support Services $20,176 $39,005 $24,698 $18,411 $15,969 -13.3%
Commerce & Community Dev. $64,625 $71,185 $44,463 $28,556 $35,407 24.0%
Corrections $3,172,492 $2,544,935 $2,895,018 $2,488,394 $3,005,293 20.8%
Defender General $149 $374 n/a
Developmental & MH Services $1,454 $2,620 $752 $857 $1,360 58.8%
Education $135,512 $164,784 $121,885 $60,665 $43,075 -29.0%
Employment & Training $163,669 $121,196 $145,182 $94,753 $44,206 -53.3%
Environmental Board $241 $424 $759 $619 $157 -74.7%
Environmental Conservation $85,042 $67,155 $65,708 $66,540 $75,411 13.3%
Finance & Management $7,428 $9,358 $13,170 $4,916 $8,414 71.2%
Fish & Wildlife $241,709 $264,108 $270,166 $308,441 $309,916 0.5%
Forest, Parks & Recreation $194,907 $205,074 $189,150 $227,911 $212,863 -6.6%
Governor's Office $68 $81 n/a
Health $123,821 $185,133 $215,220 $232,204 $225,036 -3.1%
Human Services $7,444 $15,860 $14,861 $7,753 $8,809 13.6%
Information & Innovation $42,161 n/a
Labor & Industry $61,478 $61,073 $49,968 $55,546 $76,903 38.4%
Libraries $0 $0 $120 $0 $0 n/a
Liquor Control $188,940 $179,854 $114,941 $112,606 $118,268 5.0%
Military $105,680 $130,926 $103,227 $101,429 $90,863 -10.4%
Natural Resources $75,623 $73,019 $75,693 $83,106 $69,467 -16.4%
PATH $73,876 $107,756 $118,114 $119,863 $174,967 46.0%
Personnel $19,997 $42,479 $47,909 $1,010 $4,438 339.5%
Public Safety $2,418,878 $2,591,484 $2,731,136 $2,557,697 $3,260,288 27.5%
Public Service $88,295 $58,752 $51,506 $27,275 $21,376 -21.6%
Secretary of State $5,031 $22,010 $8,962 $11,994 $3,824 -68.1%
Small Departments $64,982 $64,360 $57,143 $71,108 $68,490 -3.7%
Social & Rehabilitation Services $346,012 $365,268 $484,453 $381,505 $405,210 6.2%
State Treasurer $2,572 $4,096 $8,947 $7,713 $4,952 -35.8%
State's Attorneys & Sheriffs $4,423 $17,346 $45,533 $63,022 $66,116 4.9%
Tax $146,478 $169,493 $195,492 $14,128 $18,910 33.9%
Transportation $2,986,675 $3,278,753 $2,731,134 $2,608,777 $2,436,913 -6.6%
Vermont Lottery Commission $19,449 $24,904 $11,276 $12,574 $26,775 112.9%
Vermont State Hospital $419,274 $540,818 $584,077 $550,726 $615,278 11.7%
Vermont Veterans' Home $382,646 $515,000 $582,899 $588,517 $609,410 3.6%
Grand Total $12,153,938 $12,543,252 $12,643,243 $11,486,593 $12,662,245 10.2%
% Change from Previous FY 3.2% 0.8% -9.1% 10.2%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include all Executive branch employees (classified, exempt and
temporary) for Fiscal Years 2000 to 2004. “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See Appendix B).
Comments: Overtime costs increased 10.2% from Fiscal Year 2003 to Fiscal Year 2004.
% Change
Department FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY03 To FY04
Aging & Disabilities $30,834 $46,786 $39,407 $50,987 $44,551 -12.6%
Agriculture $49,912 $45,705 $38,221 $39,590 $38,900 -1.7%
Attorney General $11,621 $8,522 $9,766 $8,735 $17,348 98.6%
Banking, Insurance & Securities $15,660 $18,811 $17,344 $20,008 $16,306 -18.5%
Buildings & General Services $100,783 $104,480 $128,132 $145,232 $162,467 11.9%
Child Support Services $28,730 $28,828 $17,927 $20,695 $14,459 -30.1%
Commerce & Community Development $36,393 $39,450 $41,895 $51,123 $55,155 7.9%
Corrections $226,489 $221,602 $220,708 $239,413 $301,684 26.0%
Defender General $17 -$138 $196 n/a
Developmental & MH Services $29,921 $21,938 $26,293 $21,663 $22,354 3.2%
Education $80,305 $83,466 $103,505 $124,829 $106,564 -14.6%
Employment & Training $34,399 $54,208 $43,225 $49,299 $37,930 -23.1%
Environmental Board $14,362 $16,688 $11,431 $12,868 $12,599 -2.1%
Environmental Conservation $97,816 $116,141 $116,716 $115,493 $125,251 8.4%
Finance & Management $6,713 $4,809 $20,078 $10,446 $16,396 57.0%
Fish & Wildlife $71,899 $62,051 $57,530 $51,907 $59,202 14.1%
Forest, Parks & Recreation $33,990 $37,426 $32,755 $38,013 $51,205 34.7%
Health $230,529 $231,910 $240,145 $234,983 $233,710 -0.5%
Human Services $15,870 $14,538 $9,758 $11,031 $14,453 31.0%
Information & Innovation $13,194 n/a
Labor & Industry $16,576 $19,770 $20,734 $22,922 $32,114 40.1%
Libraries $1,515 $1,921 $1,380 $1,383 $720 -47.9%
Liquor Control $15,397 $17,114 $10,410 $18,404 $16,330 -11.3%
Military $48,182 $61,306 $55,679 $74,474 $75,730 1.7%
Natural Resources $10,570 $11,965 $8,388 $8,469 $10,471 23.6%
PATH $60,092 $81,891 $79,528 $77,183 $119,714 55.1%
Personnel $10,657 $13,763 $13,356 $12,387 $10,048 -18.9%
Public Safety $256,486 $256,907 $308,351 $323,518 $348,122 7.6%
Public Service $14,181 $13,398 $17,451 $10,254 $14,768 44.0%
Secretary of State $9,533 $10,986 $11,530 $11,006 $17,627 60.2%
Small Departments $19,355 $13,092 $19,622 $13,808 $13,765 -0.3%
Social & Rehabilitation Services $199,158 $184,616 $205,937 $220,853 $207,828 -5.9%
State Treasurer $3,796 $3,117 $2,942 $1,778 $916 -48.5%
State's Attorneys & Sheriffs $345 $1,635 $25 $223 $368 65.2%
Tax $18,089 $20,028 $24,308 $8,245 $7,739 -6.1%
Transportation $471,386 $582,779 $612,081 $762,266 $676,817 -11.2%
Vermont Lottery Commission $1,589 $3,958 $1,413 $652 $2,435 273.8%
Vermont State Hospital $47,468 $49,372 $48,223 $48,966 $65,581 33.9%
Vermont Veterans' Home $14,564 $24,287 $34,638 $32,207 $50,227 56.0%
Grand Total $2,335,179 $2,529,126 $2,650,832 $2,895,311 $3,015,243 4.1%
% Change from Previous FY 8.3% 4.8% 9.2% 4.1%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include all Executive branch employees (classified and exempt) for
Fiscal Years 2000 to 2004. “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See Appendix B).
Comments: Compensatory time costs have increased 4.1% from Fiscal Year 2003 to Fiscal Year 2004.
Highlights:
Workforce
Trends
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. Civilian Labor Force data from 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 population surveys, U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics ([Link] Note: Labor force numbers are rounded to the nearest thousand.
Comments: The latest population figures available (2003) show Vermont’s civilian labor force to be
comprised of 52.4% male and 47.6% female, which closely mirrors the State of Vermont’s classified
workforce. However, the Vermont civilian workforce population estimates for minority representation
show an over 1% increase to 2.8% in 2003, compared to the 1.8% percentage representation found in
the State of Vermont’s classified workforce in Fiscal Years 2003 and 2004.
Benchmarking
New England State Governments – Gender and Ethnic Representation
Five Year
FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Average
Department
Minority
Minority
Minority
Minority
Minority
Minority
White
White
White
White
White
White
Aging & Disabilities 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Agriculture 1.2% 98.8% 1.3% 98.8% 1.2% 98.8% 1.3% 98.8% 0.0% 100.0% 1.2% 99.0%
Attorney General 3.7% 96.3% 4.3% 95.7% 3.4% 96.6% 3.4% 96.6% 3.6% 96.4% 3.7% 96.3%
BISHCA 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Buildings & General Services 2.7% 97.3% 2.3% 97.7% 1.7% 98.3% 2.1% 97.9% 2.3% 97.7% 2.3% 97.8%
Child Support Services 3.6% 96.4% 3.6% 96.4% 2.7% 97.3% 2.7% 97.3% 2.6% 97.4% 3.1% 97.0%
Commerce & Community Dev. 1.3% 98.7% 2.4% 97.6% 2.4% 97.6% 2.5% 97.5% 2.5% 97.5% 2.3% 97.8%
Corrections 2.7% 97.3% 2.4% 97.6% 2.5% 97.5% 2.8% 97.2% 2.8% 97.2% 2.6% 97.4%
Developmental & MH Services 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Education 1.4% 98.6% 1.2% 98.8% 1.7% 98.3% 0.6% 99.4% 0.6% 99.4% 1.3% 98.9%
Employment & Training 0.9% 99.1% 0.9% 99.1% 0.9% 99.1% 0.9% 99.1% 1.1% 98.9% 0.9% 99.1%
Environmental Board 3.7% 96.3% 3.6% 96.4% 3.7% 96.3% 3.8% 96.2% 3.8% 96.2% 3.7% 96.3%
Environmental Conservation 1.6% 98.4% 1.5% 98.5% 1.9% 98.1% 2.3% 97.7% 2.3% 97.7% 2.0% 98.1%
Finance & Management 3.3% 96.7% 4.0% 96.0% 3.0% 97.0% 3.2% 96.8% 2.9% 97.1% 3.3% 96.8%
Fish & Wildlife 1.7% 98.3% 1.7% 98.3% 1.8% 98.2% 0.8% 99.2% 0.9% 99.1% 1.5% 98.6%
Forest, Parks & Recreation 1.7% 98.3% 0.8% 99.2% 0.9% 99.1% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 1.3% 99.3%
Health 1.5% 98.5% 1.9% 98.1% 1.7% 98.3% 1.5% 98.5% 1.5% 98.5% 1.6% 98.4%
Human Services 1.6% 98.4% 1.9% 98.1% 1.8% 98.2% 2.2% 97.8% 2.1% 97.9% 1.9% 98.1%
Information and Innovation 0.0% 100.0% n/a n/a
Labor & Industry 1.3% 98.7% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 1.3% 99.7%
Libraries 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 3.0% 97.0% 3.0% 97.0% 3.0% 98.8%
Liquor Control 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Military 2.3% 97.7% 4.0% 96.0% 4.6% 95.4% 4.7% 95.3% 4.7% 95.3% 4.3% 95.9%
Natural Resources 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
PATH 0.3% 99.7% 0.2% 99.8% 0.7% 99.3% 1.0% 99.0% 1.0% 99.0% 0.8% 99.4%
Personnel 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Public Safety 1.1% 98.9% 1.4% 98.6% 1.4% 98.6% 1.5% 98.5% 1.4% 98.6% 1.4% 98.6%
Public Service 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Secretary of State 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Small Departments 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Social & Rehabilitation Services 1.8% 98.2% 1.6% 98.4% 1.5% 98.5% 1.8% 98.2% 1.8% 98.2% 1.7% 98.3%
State Treasurer 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 3.8% 96.2% 3.8% 96.2% 3.4% 96.6% 3.7% 97.8%
Taxes 1.7% 98.3% 1.7% 98.3% 2.2% 97.8% 1.7% 98.3% 1.1% 98.9% 1.8% 98.3%
Transportation 2.1% 97.9% 2.2% 97.8% 2.4% 97.6% 2.4% 97.6% 2.4% 97.6% 2.3% 97.7%
Vermont Lottery Commission 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Vermont State Hospital 3.9% 96.1% 3.2% 96.8% 3.9% 96.1% 2.8% 97.2% 3.9% 96.1% 3.5% 96.5%
Vermont Veterans' Home 1.7% 98.3% 2.3% 97.7% 1.5% 98.5% 1.4% 98.6% 1.5% 98.5% 1.7% 98.3%
Grand Total 1.7% 98.3% 1.7% 98.3% 1.8% 98.2% 1.8% 98.2% 1.8% 98.2% 1.8% 98.3%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See Appendix B).
Comments: In terms of actual numbers for Fiscal Year 2004, two departments - and Corrections (31
minority employees) and Transportation (30 minority employees) - account for over 45% of the minority
representation among classified State of Vermont employees.
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Aging & Disabilities 70.2% 29.8% 69.4% 30.6% 70.6% 29.4% 71.0% 29.0% 71.0% 29.0% 70.5% 29.5%
Agriculture 33.3% 66.7% 33.8% 66.3% 33.3% 66.7% 32.5% 67.5% 33.7% 66.3% 33.3% 66.7%
Attorney General 55.6% 44.4% 60.9% 39.1% 65.5% 34.5% 65.5% 34.5% 71.4% 28.6% 64.4% 36.8%
BISHCA 50.7% 49.3% 51.4% 48.6% 48.6% 51.4% 51.3% 48.7% 55.1% 44.9% 51.6% 48.6%
Buildings & General Services 27.5% 72.5% 28.2% 71.8% 29.8% 70.2% 28.8% 71.2% 30.3% 69.7% 29.0% 71.0%
Child Support Services 70.3% 29.7% 71.2% 28.8% 70.3% 29.7% 72.1% 27.9% 70.4% 29.6% 70.8% 29.2%
Commerce & Community Dev. 63.3% 36.7% 62.4% 37.6% 62.7% 37.3% 63.8% 36.3% 60.8% 39.2% 62.6% 37.5%
Corrections 30.3% 69.7% 31.0% 69.0% 31.5% 68.5% 31.3% 68.7% 31.9% 68.1% 31.2% 68.8%
Developmental & MH Services 69.9% 30.1% 70.1% 29.9% 71.4% 28.6% 69.8% 30.2% 68.5% 31.5% 70.0% 30.0%
Education 72.0% 28.0% 74.8% 25.2% 76.0% 24.0% 74.1% 25.9% 71.2% 28.8% 73.6% 26.4%
Employment & Training 63.2% 36.8% 63.6% 36.4% 63.8% 36.3% 63.2% 36.8% 62.1% 37.9% 63.2% 36.8%
Environmental Board 66.7% 33.3% 67.9% 32.1% 66.7% 33.3% 69.2% 30.8% 69.2% 30.8% 67.9% 32.1%
Environmental Conservation 35.8% 64.2% 36.7% 63.3% 36.6% 63.4% 37.0% 63.0% 36.8% 63.2% 36.6% 63.4%
Finance & Management 56.7% 43.3% 56.0% 44.0% 60.6% 39.4% 61.3% 38.7% 57.1% 42.9% 58.4% 41.7%
Fish & Wildlife 16.1% 83.9% 17.4% 82.6% 18.4% 81.6% 20.3% 79.7% 20.2% 79.8% 18.6% 81.6%
Forest, Parks & Recreation 22.2% 77.8% 22.5% 77.5% 22.2% 77.8% 27.0% 73.0% 27.7% 72.3% 24.6% 75.8%
Health 80.3% 19.7% 80.7% 19.3% 80.7% 19.3% 80.1% 19.9% 80.7% 19.3% 80.5% 19.5%
Human Services 63.9% 36.1% 66.0% 34.0% 61.8% 38.2% 64.4% 35.6% 72.3% 27.7% 65.6% 34.8%
Information & Innovation 32.7% 67.3% n/a n/a
Labor & Industry 33.3% 66.7% 31.9% 68.1% 31.6% 68.4% 33.3% 66.7% 32.9% 67.1% 32.6% 67.4%
Libraries 66.7% 33.3% 69.7% 30.3% 67.7% 32.3% 69.7% 30.3% 69.7% 30.3% 68.7% 31.4%
Liquor Control 39.2% 60.8% 37.7% 62.3% 33.3% 66.7% 28.8% 71.2% 32.1% 67.9% 34.6% 66.0%
Military 13.6% 86.4% 11.1% 88.9% 13.9% 86.1% 15.1% 84.9% 14.0% 86.0% 13.7% 86.4%
Natural Resources 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 55.2% 44.8% 47.5% 52.5% 46.2% 53.8% 49.7% 50.8%
PATH 77.1% 22.9% 78.1% 21.9% 77.7% 22.3% 77.3% 22.7% 78.5% 21.5% 77.7% 22.3%
Personnel 77.1% 22.9% 79.2% 20.8% 79.2% 20.8% 78.4% 21.6% 80.8% 19.2% 79.0% 21.1%
Public Safety 28.5% 71.5% 29.4% 70.6% 30.1% 69.9% 30.0% 70.0% 28.9% 71.1% 29.4% 70.6%
Public Service 47.4% 52.6% 48.6% 51.4% 51.4% 48.6% 55.3% 44.7% 59.5% 40.5% 52.8% 48.0%
Secretary of State 75.6% 24.4% 75.0% 25.0% 76.3% 23.7% 76.3% 23.7% 73.2% 26.8% 75.3% 24.8%
Small Departments 56.8% 43.2% 52.3% 47.7% 44.2% 55.8% 47.2% 52.8% 48.6% 51.4% 50.1% 50.4%
Social & Rehabilitation Services 71.5% 28.5% 72.0% 28.0% 72.0% 28.0% 71.2% 28.8% 71.1% 28.9% 71.5% 28.5%
State Treasurer 73.1% 26.9% 61.5% 38.5% 57.7% 42.3% 57.7% 42.3% 65.5% 34.5% 63.4% 37.7%
Taxes 63.8% 36.2% 63.6% 36.4% 64.4% 35.6% 64.0% 36.0% 64.9% 35.1% 64.2% 35.8%
Transportation 28.4% 71.6% 28.3% 71.7% 28.7% 71.3% 28.6% 71.4% 29.2% 70.8% 28.6% 71.4%
Vermont Lottery Commission 61.1% 38.9% 63.2% 36.8% 66.7% 33.3% 72.2% 27.8% 66.7% 33.3% 66.1% 34.5%
Vermont State Hospital 54.6% 45.4% 56.3% 43.7% 53.5% 46.5% 55.6% 44.4% 53.6% 46.4% 54.7% 45.3%
Vermont Veterans' Home 77.9% 22.1% 77.2% 22.8% 78.5% 21.5% 80.4% 19.6% 79.0% 21.0% 78.7% 21.4%
Grand Total 47.8% 52.2% 48.1% 51.9% 48.4% 51.6% 48.4% 51.6% 48.2% 51.8% 48.2% 51.8%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See Appendix B).
Comments: While the overall five fiscal year average was 48.2% female and 51.8% male, there are
clear department differences in gender representation.
% Change
Occupational Group FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
FY 00 to FY 04
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Female
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Male
Office/Clerical 85.6% 14.4% 84.7% 15.3% 85.6% 14.4% 85.3% 14.7% 85.7% 14.3% 0.1% -0.7%
Officials and Administrators 32.3% 67.7% 31.6% 68.4% 35.1% 64.9% 36.7% 63.3% 37.4% 62.6% 15.8% -7.5%
Paraprofessionals 63.9% 36.1% 60.7% 39.3% 64.9% 35.1% 69.3% 30.7% 68.8% 31.3% 7.7% -13.5%
Professionals 50.2% 49.8% 51.9% 48.1% 53.8% 46.2% 53.6% 46.4% 54.1% 45.9% 7.8% -7.8%
Protective Service 15.0% 85.0% 18.3% 81.7% 18.7% 81.3% 18.9% 81.1% 19.3% 80.7% 28.7% -5.0%
Service Maintenance 16.4% 83.6% 15.3% 84.7% 33.3% 66.7% 31.8% 68.2% 32.7% 67.3% 99.2% -19.5%
Skilled Craft 2.8% 97.2% 2.7% 97.3% 3.8% 96.2% 3.9% 96.1% 3.9% 96.1% 37.0% -1.1%
Technicians 55.6% 44.4% 57.9% 42.1% 51.4% 48.6% 52.9% 47.1% 52.6% 47.4% -5.3% 6.6%
Grand Total 47.8% 52.2% 48.1% 51.9% 48.4% 51.6% 48.4% 51.6% 48.2% 51.8% 0.8% -0.7%
Five Year
Occupational Group FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Average
Minority
Minority
Minority
Minority
Minority
Minority
White
White
White
White
White
White
Office/Clerical 2.1% 97.9% 2.3% 97.7% 2.8% 97.2% 2.9% 97.1% 3.0% 97.0% 2.6% 97.4%
Officials and Administrators 0.7% 99.3% 0.7% 99.3% 0.6% 99.4% 1.2% 98.8% 1.5% 98.5% 1.1% 99.1%
Paraprofessionals 4.2% 95.8% 4.9% 95.1% 3.4% 96.6% 3.1% 96.9% 3.6% 96.4% 3.9% 96.2%
Professionals 1.2% 98.8% 1.3% 98.7% 1.4% 98.6% 1.5% 98.5% 1.3% 98.7% 1.3% 98.7%
Protective Service 2.2% 97.8% 2.2% 97.8% 2.0% 98.0% 1.8% 98.2% 2.1% 97.9% 2.1% 97.9%
Service Maintenance 2.6% 97.4% 1.8% 98.2% 1.9% 98.1% 1.9% 98.1% 2.9% 97.1% 2.3% 97.8%
Skilled Craft 1.6% 98.4% 2.1% 97.9% 1.6% 98.4% 1.6% 98.4% 1.8% 98.2% 1.7% 98.3%
Technicians 1.9% 98.1% 1.7% 98.3% 2.1% 97.9% 1.9% 98.1% 2.1% 97.9% 1.9% 98.1%
Grand Total 1.7% 98.3% 1.7% 98.3% 1.8% 98.2% 1.8% 98.2% 1.8% 98.2% 1.8% 98.3%
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. Occupational categories are based on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s occupational categories
for state and local government (EEO-4). Appendix A gives a full definition of each category.
Comments: For gender representation by occupational group the percent change from Fiscal Year 2000
to Fiscal Year 2004 is shown. During this period there was nearly a 100% increase in female
representation in the Service Maintenance category. Female representation in Skilled Craft (37.0%) and
Protective Service (28.7%) categories also showed significant gains.
Because there was little percentage change from FY 2000 to FY 2004 in minority representation by
occupational category, the summary data show the five-year average minority percentages. The highest
average minority representation is found in the paraprofessional job category (3.9%) and the lowest was
in the Officials and Administrators category (1.1%).
With a Disability
16.8%
No Disability
83.2%
Source: Vermont State Employee Disability and Diversity Survey Analysis October 2003, University of Vermont, Center for Rural
Studies. Data is based on a random sample of 1,438 State of Vermont employees surveyed during May, 2003 and has a margin of
error of +/- 1.9%.
Comments: Based on a scientific survey of employees compiled by the University of Vermont, Center for
Rural Studies we can project that the percentage of employees with disabilities in the State of Vermont
workforce is 16.8%. This figure compares favorably with 2000 U.S. Census data that indicated 16.2% of
the Vermont civilian non-institutionalized population aged 21 to 64 years old has a disability1.
1
U.S. Census 2000, Table DP-2 Profile of Selected Social Characteristics: 2000
Highlights:
Workforce
Trends
State of Vermont Workforce Report – FY 2004 67
Table 38 Average Annual Leave Use and Average Costs per Classified
Employee by Department by Fiscal Year
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal
Years 2000 to 2004. “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See Appendix B).
Comments: From Fiscal Year 2000 to Fiscal Year 2004, annual leave costs have risen by 18.5%. This is
the result of higher average salaries.
Source: The state’s Human Resource Management System. The state’s Human Resource Management System. Data include only
classified employees of the Executive branch for Fiscal Years 2000 to 2004. “Small Departments” have 10 or fewer employees (See
Appendix B).
Comments: Average sick leave usage has remained relatively constant from Fiscal Year 2000 to Fiscal
Year 2004. Overall, the State has experienced a 23.6% increase in the average cost of sick leave per
employee from Fiscal Year 2000 to Fiscal Year 2004. This is the result of higher average salaries.
Contractors on Payroll
Classification Reviews
Section Four
New
2003 Act 66,
Sec. 217d.(a) Fish and Wildlife Fish & Wildlife Scientist III 1
2003 Act 55, Deputy Commissioner of Captive
Sec 10(a) BISHCA Insurance 1
Comments: A total of two new Executive branch permanent positions were authorized by the Legislature
for Fiscal Year 2004.
Department Number
Aging & Disabilities 2
Corrections 4
Attorney General 1
Environmental Conservation 4
Health 6
PATH 2
State's Attorneys 2
TOTAL 21
Comments: A limited service position is a non-tenured position in the classified service which, when initially
established, is reasonably expected to exist for a limited duration, frequently more than one year, but less
than three years. Such positions usually have a definite termination date and may be associated with a
specially funded project or program. The Legislature or the Joint Fiscal Committee approves the creation of
limited service positions. Positions created for the purposes of implementing grant-funded initiatives are
described in 32 VSA § 5.
Temporary Categories
Part-Time On-
Intermittent
Emergency
Bona Fide
Seasonal
Sporadic
Fill Ins
Going
Other
Total
Total Total Gross
Department Hours Wages
Aging & Disabilities 3 7 10 4,901 $68,148
Agriculture 2 1 2 13 18 3,283 $40,142
Attorney General 1 2 2 3 8 2,583 $50,241
BISHCA 1 3 4 3,166 $33,789
Buildings & General Services 42 1 31 32 3 109 68,274 $682,198
Child Support Services 1 1 686 $8,870
Commerce & Community Dev. 4 4 67 1 7 83 28,822 $287,144
Corrections 193 3 1 1 3 9 210 77,154 $978,599
Criminal Justice Training Council 1 2 3 1,421 $18,156
Defender General 1 1 2 832 $14,012
Developmental & MH Services 4 1 5 2,555 $35,206
Education 1 1 1 3 178 184 15,740 $217,195
Employment & Training 4 2 2 4 12 4,443 $59,810
Environmental Board 1 1 1,368 $17,688
Environmental Conservation 1 48 7 3 59 28,218 $340,173
Fish & Wildlife 1 76 1 78 38,804 $463,515
Forest, Parks & Recreation 1 1 439 2 443 167,151 $1,605,517
Governor's Office 1 1 2 119 $1,337
Health 9 8 1 25 8 1 52 25,363 $318,699
Human Services 2 4 1 7 2,706 $28,275
Information and Innovation 1 2 3 2,007 $21,263
Judicial 8 8 2,401 $27,743
Labor & Industry 5 1 3 9 4,043 $52,630
Libraries 1 1 69 $621
Liquor Control 1 1 177 $1,975
Military 1 2 3 4 10 2,652 $34,206
Natural Resources 4 4 4,682 $77,361
PATH 3 1 1 5 3,668 $48,456
Personnel 4 1 1 6 3,230 $37,646
Public Safety 78 8 3 32 4 23 148 67,222 $944,614
Public Service 1 1 472 $8,949
Secretary of State 2 7 3 12 3,893 $48,709
Secretary of the Senate 1 1 984 $18,611
Social & Rehabilitation Services 33 1 28 62 37,526 $477,685
State Treasurer 2 1 1 4 1,685 $21,040
State's Attorneys & Sheriffs 1 1 2 4 965 $15,652
Taxes 70 6 4 80 28,963 $312,706
Transportation 13 9 1 228 11 23 285 125,943 $1,534,706
Temporary Categories
Intermittent
Emergency
Part-Time
Bona Fide
On-Going
Seasonal
Sporadic
Fill Ins
Other
Total
Total Total Gross
Department Hours Wages
Vermont Lottery Commission 1 1 838 $11,942
Vermont State Hospital 17 38 5 60 49,133 $671,867
Vermont Veterans' Home 11 7 13 12 6 49 23,853 $235,035
Vt Fire Service Training Council 71 1 72 11,984 $192,686
Grand Total 431 151 13 1046 125 352 2118 854,066 $10,066,150
Source: Department of Human Resources. “Other” was used when the code category was not available.
Comments: Temporary positions are created when there is a short-term need for additional employees.
There are six categories of temporary employees: (1) BONA FIDE EMERGENCY. This category is
usually limited to an unforeseen situation that requires a short-term staffing increase to avoid a serious
threat to critical services that would otherwise jeopardize public safety. Employment may be full time
during the emergency; (2) FILL-INS. A fill-in is a one-for-one replacement of an existing employee who
may be on a leave of absence for illness, military, educational, or family reasons. This category may also
be used to fill-in for a vacant position that is actively under recruitment. Employment may be full time
during the fill-in period; (3) INTERMITTENT. This category is reserved for situations where there are
fluctuations in the workload that are not seasonal. Occasionally the employee may work 40 hours, but not
on a regular basis; (4) PART-TIME ON-GOING. This category covers regular, on-going part-time
employment; (5) SEASONAL. Seasonal employment is defined within each department and may vary by
program. Each season has a defined beginning and end, and the season repeats on a yearly basis; and
(6) SPORADIC. These situations have no pattern or order. They may include projects, special caseloads,
and other situations where an employee is needed for a short period of time or on an occasional basis
over a period of time; and
In Fiscal Year 2004, 2,118 temporary employees worked a total of 854,066 hours and were paid a total of
$10,066,150 in gross wages. Below is a table comparing the use of temporary employees for Fiscal Years
2000 to 2004. Fiscal Year 2004 saw an increase over Fiscal Year 2003 in both the number of temporary
employees (16.4%), as well as total hours (+16.2%). Total gross wages rose 20.9%.
Number
of
Agency/Department Contracts Total Value
Aging & Disabilities 54 $2,213,829
Agriculture 39 $292,180
Auditor of Accounts 2 $16,000
BISHCA 57 $10,213,310
Buildings & General Services 129 $22,225,553
Child Support Services 5 $1,945,955
Commerce & Community Development 61 $964,505
Corrections 138 $87,921,910
Criminal Justice Training Council 7 $115,000
Defender General 92 $3,333,807
Developmental & Mental Health Services 77 $10,337,753
Education 52 $5,730,096
Employment & Training 65 $537,483
Environmental Conservation 22 $2,072,358
Finance & Management 3 $86,132
Fish & Wildlife 14 $966,350
Forest, Parks and Recreation 9 $353,112
Governor's Office 1 $7,500
Health 85 $2,421,942
Human Services 19 $977,896
Information & Innovation 1 $9,800
Labor & Industry 10 $155,164
Libraries 1 $25,000
Liquor Control 2 $82,500
Military 34 $2,894,364
Natural Resources 3 $66,680
PATH 36 $8,945,384
Personnel 6 $2,859,815
Public Safety 62 $849,340
Public Service 26 $1,325,590
Social & Rehabilitation Services 24 $1,463,649
State Treasurer 20 $13,274,150
Taxes 13 $460,594
Transportation 90 $14,304,638
Vermont Veteran's Home 11 $471,551
VT Fire Service Training Council 3 $146,202
Grand Total 1,273 $200,067,092
Source: VISION/Finance and Agency/Department self reporting. Act 66 (2003 session) Section 5. Definitions: “Personal Services”
means wages and salaries, consulting services, personnel benefits, personal injury benefits under 21 VSA § 636 and similar items.
Comments: Given the large number of contracts, only summary data is included in this report.
Average
Pos. Hourly
Num. Department Title Rate
438191 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $12.50
438194 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $12.00
438210 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $12.00
438216 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $13.00
438241 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $10.50
438244 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $12.50
438257 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $12.00
438345 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $11.00
438393 Aging & Disabilities Contractual $12.00
438400 Aging & Disabilities Contractual $12.00
438410 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $12.00
438411 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $12.00
438412 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $12.00
438413 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $12.50
438414 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $12.00
438415 Aging & Disabilities Contractual $9.00
438428 Aging & Disabilities Vocational Rehabilitation Tutor/Trainer $12.00
Aging & Disabilities 17
068001 Buildings & General Services Contractual $26.00
068003 Buildings & General Services Contractual $25.00
068004 Buildings & General Services Contractual $23.00
068005 Buildings & General Services Contractual $23.00
068006 Buildings & General Services Contractual $24.00
068007 Buildings & General Services Contractual $24.00
068011 Buildings & General Services Contractual $22.00
Buildings & General Services 7
468010 Corrections Contractual $25.00
468011 Corrections Contractual $25.00
468022 Corrections Contractual $24.00
468071 Corrections Contractual $25.00
468091 Corrections Contractual $25.70
468151 Corrections Contractual $25.70
Corrections 6
648001 Fish & Wildlife Deputy Game Warden $10.00
648002 Fish & Wildlife Deputy Game Warden $12.06
648011 Fish & Wildlife Deputy Game Warden $10.00
648012 Fish & Wildlife Deputy Game Warden $10.00
648015 Fish & Wildlife Deputy Game Warden $10.00
648016 Fish & Wildlife Deputy Game Warden $10.00
648019 Fish & Wildlife Deputy Game Warden $10.00
648022 Fish & Wildlife Deputy Game Warden $10.00
648024 Fish & Wildlife Deputy Game Warden $14.00
Fish & Wildlife 9
Grand Total 70
Comments: These are contractors from whom income taxes should be withheld, but whose working
relationships with the State of Vermont are properly outside of the classified service.
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Annualized Base
Annualized Base
Annualized Base
Annualized Base
Annualized Base
Salary Increase
Salary Increase
Salary Increase
Salary Increase
Salary Increase
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
Positions
Positions
Positions
Positions
Positions
Department
Administration 0 $0 1 $6,240 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Aging & Disabilities 10 $16,494 30 $60,549 70 $133,557 49 $132,434 31 $77,771
Agriculture 7 $13,770 5 $13,749 11 $30,285 2 $5,304 23 $52,458
Attorney General 0 $0 1 $0 2 $4,035 2 $9,672 1 $1,934
Auditor Of Accounts 2 $17,826 2 $5,574 4 $13,250 0 $0 0 $0
BISHCA 3 $7,509 2 $5,845 6 $25,334 2 $9,256 26 $58,677
Buildings & General Services 36 $59,134 164 $283,899 98 $212,805 51 $138,861 44 $102,149
Child Support Services 8 $15,642 63 $174,325 36 $75,421 21 $55,702 9 $23,213
Commerce & Community Dev. 13 $30,867 4 $8,944 49 $134,846 8 $38,293 5 $19,718
Corrections 117 $238,326 78 $179,462 91 $170,019 61 $138,445 82 $188,053
Criminal Justice Training Council 2 $4,035 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 $9,485
Developmental & MH Services 8 $24,398 28 $73,133 17 $51,896 0 $0 5 $13,770
Education 12 $27,102 11 $29,328 133 $378,206 23 $76,170 21 $61,048
Employment & Training 34 $62,670 40 $61,152 47 $82,992 26 $65,083 160 $372,507
Environmental Board 1 $1,810 1 $1,830 1 $5,325 7 $19,427 0 $0
Environmental Conservation 207 $446,930 8 $13,250 27 $74,006 25 $63,398 91 $231,795
Finance & Management 8 $20,218 7 $17,950 13 $41,933 1 $1,664 1 $3,390
Fish & Wildlife 8 $17,326 48 $112,154 8 $14,581 108 $323,066 12 $45,656
Forest, Parks & Recreation 6 $10,234 7 $16,349 103 $247,811 3 $15,309 9 $16,952
Health 57 $158,082 57 $152,006 89 $195,998 58 $205,421 72 $205,234
Human Services 8 $22,277 4 $9,402 7 $15,600 3 $18,262 11 $33,176
Information & Innovation 0 $0 5 $16,078
Labor & Industry 3 $10,774 12 $27,373 23 $53,893 31 $84,614 4 $10,088
Libraries 9 $12,293 2 $2,933 0 $0 0 $0 1 $1,206
Liquor Control 11 $13,083 17 $40,768 10 $16,099 5 $15,870 2 $749
Office of Economic Opportunity 1 $2,725 0 $0 0 $0 2 $4,784 1 $1,934
PATH 10 $22,402 26 $58,157 280 $685,526 49 $149,282 36 $91,624
Personnel 12 $23,525 8 $14,976 14 $37,877 23 $55,786 15 $45,968
Public Safety - Civilian 33 $94,474 81 $250,245 47 $112,486 27 $73,757 26 $65,770
Public Safety - State Police 78 $226,824 303 $865,904 42 $120,037 39 $102,773 32 $87,942
Public Service 2 $3,952 14 $35,984 1 $2,662 10 $23,670 4 $10,795
Public Service Board 0 $0 1 $1,955 1 $5,346 0 $0 1 $1,768
Secretary of State 2 $5,054 14 $41,080 17 $38,688 0 $0 9 $19,011
Social & Rehab. Services 53 $101,566 33 $70,762 30 $75,712 45 $159,598 79 $237,536
State Treasurer 1 $2,184 1 $1,685 3 $2,080 3 $13,666 20 $60,840
Annualized Base
Annualized Base
Annualized Base
Annualized Base
Annualized Base
Salary Increase
Salary Increase
Salary Increase
Salary Increase
Salary Increase
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
Reviewed
Positions
Positions
Positions
Positions
Positions
Department
Taxes 34 $55,494 10 $15,267 52 $133,328 30 $65,894 16 $36,608
Transportation 147 $195,645 433 $873,517 612 $1,126,070 203 $396,365 185 $454,667
VT Commission on Women 1 $2,850 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Vermont Lottery Commission 12 $26,770 2 $11,003 5 $8,923 1 $2,642 0 $0
Vermont State Hospital 5 $11,232 27 $53,269 58 $154,482 69 $294,278 11 $45,635
Vermont Veteran's Home 9 $15,454 3 $6,677 31 $47,154 3 $19,302 5 $30,493
VT Fire Service Training Council 0 $0 0 $0 1 $2,600 0 $0 0 $0
Water Resources Board 0 $0 1 $3,099 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0
Total 997 $2,090,236 1600 $3,717,501 2056 $4,565,704 1009 $2,826,554 1089 $2,789,197
Source: Department of Human Resources. Data represents filled positions reallocated to a higher or lower pay grade – it does not
include vacant positions or positions found to be properly classified (no change in pay grade or salary)
Comments: In Fiscal Year 2004 there were a total of 1,089 classification reviews that resulted in
reallocation to a higher or lower pay grade. The annualized base salary increase of these reallocations
was $2,789,197. This is the future additional cost due to reallocation, in the subsequent and future years.
This provides a measure of the impact of the reallocation on future year costs and is not exact. It does
not include costs that are difficult to measure, such as additional partial year cost to the department in the
year of the reallocation, retroactive adjustments, overtime, and benefit cost adjustments.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has established eight standardized occupational
groupings.
Administrators and Officials: Occupations in which employees set broad policies, exercise overall
responsibility for execution of these policies, or direct individual departments or special phases of the
agency’s operations, or provide specialized consultation on a regional, district or area basis. Includes
department heads, bureau chiefs, division chiefs, directors, deputy directors, controllers, wardens,
superintendents, sheriffs, police and fire chiefs and inspectors, examiners (bank, hearing, motor vehicle,
warehouse), inspectors (construction, building, safety, rent-and-housing, fire, license, dairy, livestock,
transportation), assessors, tax appraisers and investigators, coroners, farm managers, and kindred
workers.
Administrative Support (Including Clerical and Sales): Occupations in which workers are responsible for
internal and external communication, recording and retrieval of data and/or information and other
paperwork required in an office. Includes bookkeepers, messengers, clerk-typists, stenographers, court
transcribers, hearing reporters, statistical clerks, dispatchers, license distributors, payroll clerks, office
machine and computer operators, telephone operators, legal assistants, sales workers, cashiers, toll
collectors, and kindred workers.
Professionals: Occupations that require specialized and theoretical knowledge that is usually acquired
through college training or through work experience and other training that provides comparable
knowledge. Includes personnel and labor relations workers, social workers, doctors, psychologists,
registered nurses, economists, dieticians, lawyers, systems analysts, accountants, engineers, employment
and vocational rehabilitation counselors, teachers or instructors, police and fire captains and lieutenants,
librarians, management analysts, airplane pilots and navigators, surveyors and mapping scientists, and
kindred workers.
Protective Service Workers: Occupations in which workers are entrusted with public safety, security and
protection from destructive forces. Includes police patrol officers, fire fighters, guards, deputy sheriffs,
bailiffs, correctional officers, detectives, marshals, harbor patrol officers, game and fish wardens, park
rangers (except maintenance), and kindred workers.
Service Maintenance: Occupations in which workers perform duties which result in or contribute to the
comfort, convenience, hygiene or safety of the general public or which contribute to the upkeep and care
of buildings, facilities or grounds of public property. Workers in this group may operate machinery.
Includes chauffeurs, laundry and dry cleaning operatives, truck drivers, bus drivers, garage laborers,
custodial employees, gardeners and groundskeepers, refuse collectors, construction laborers, park rangers
(maintenance), farm workers (except managers), craft apprentices/trainees/helpers, and kindred workers.
Skilled Craft Workers: Occupations in which workers perform jobs which require special manual skill and a
thorough and comprehensive knowledge of the processes involved in the work which is acquired through
on-the-job training and experience or through apprenticeship or other formal training programs. Includes
mechanics and repairers, electricians, heavy equipment operators, stationary engineers, skilled machining
occupations, carpenters, compositors and typesetters, power plant operators, water and sewage
treatment plant operators, and kindred workers.
Small
Department, Full Name Department, Used in Report Department ?
Adjutant General, Office of Military
Agency of Administration Administration Yes
Aging & Disabilities, Department of Aging & Disabilities
Agriculture, Food & Markets, Agency of Agriculture
Attorney General, Office of Attorney General
Auditor of Accounts Auditor of Accounts Yes
Banking, Insurance, Securities & Health Care
Administration, Department of BISHCA
Buildings & General Services, Department of Buildings & General Services
Child Support Services, Office of Child Support Services
Commerce & Community Development, Commerce & Community
Agency Development
Corrections, Department of Corrections
Defender General, Office of Defender General
Developmental & Mental Health Services,
Department of Developmental & MH Services
Economic Opportunity, Office of Economic Opportunity Yes
Education, Department of Education
Employment & Training, Department of Employment & Training
Environmental Board & Waste Facility Panel Environmental Board
Environmental Conservation, Department of Environmental Conservation
Finance & Management, Department of Finance & Management
Fish & Wildlife, Department of Fish & Wildlife
Forest, Parks & Recreation, Department of Forest, Parks & Recreation
Governor's, Office of the Governor's Office
Health, Department Health
Human Services, Agency of Human Services
Labor & Industry, Department of Labor & Industry
Information & Innovation, Department of Information & Innovation
Libraries, Department of Libraries
Lieutenant Governor Lieutenant Governor
Liquor Control, Department of Liquor Control
Lottery Commission, Vermont Vermont Lottery Commission
Natural Resources, Agency of Natural Resources
Personnel, Department of Personnel
Prevention, Access, Transition and Health
Access, Department of PATH
Public Safety, Department of Public Safety
Public Service Board Public Service Board Yes
Public Service, Department of Public Service
Secretary of State Secretary of State
Social & Rehabilitation Services Social & Rehabilitation Services
State's Attorneys & Sheriffs, Department of State's Attorneys & Sheriffs
Taxes, Department of Taxes
Transportation, Agency of Transportation
Treasurer, Office of State State Treasurer
Vermont Commission on Women Vermont Commission on Women Yes
Small
Department, Full Name Department, Used in Report Department ?
Vermont Criminal Justice Training Council Criminal Justice Training Council Yes
Vermont Fire Service Training Council Vt Fire Service Training Council Yes
Vermont Human Rights Commission Vermont Human Rights Commission Yes
Vermont Labor Relations Board Vermont Labor Relations Board Yes
Vermont State Hospital Vermont State Hospital
Vermont Veterans' Home Vermont Veterans' Home
VOSHA Review Board VOSHA Review Board Yes
Water Resources Board Water Resources Board Yes