PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERS

MENG 3500

LAB ASSIGNMENTS RUBRIC

 PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERS
MENG 3500

LABORATORY ASSIGNMENT SHEET

Lab Lab Successful Report
Description
Assignment Attendance Run Mark
1 Motor Control
Two-DC Motors Control With The
2
Problem Detection
3 Timers and Counters
4 Computations and Comparison
5 Cascading Sequence
6 Sequencer Output Application
7 Stepper Motor Control
8 Programming with ST, FBD, SFC
9 Temperature ON-OFF control
10 Temperature PID control

Student Name: Student No.

It is the student’s responsibility to keep this sheet up to date as the proof of the course
work.

Notes:
• The column titled Attendance will be checked at the end of the lab activity.
• The column titled Successful Runs, will be initialed when the assignment is seen to run
and satisfy the requirements.
• The column titled Report / Mark will be initialed when the report has been handed in to
the professor and marked.
• The minimum passing mark will be given to the signed assignments without written
report. All the labs have to be handed in with the screen captures related to the
programming/design steps.
PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERS
LAB ASSIGNMENT – MARKING RUBRIC

Name Student No. Section

Lab Assig. No. Description Date

I. ASSIGNMENT EXECUTION / ASSIGNMENT RUNNING AT FULL FUNCTIONALITY

0.5 marks 1 mark 2 marks
- meets very little of the - meets some of the - meets or exceeds all of the
Functionality 0 marks
assignment criteria assignment criteria assignment criteria
/2
- limited functionality - some functionality - full functionality

II. LADDER DIAGRAM / PROGRAM REPORT

2 marks
- demonstrates acceptable
competence and
professionalism
0.5 marks 1 mark - all I/O & data points have
- demonstrates very - demonstrates some accurate symbols and/or
Ladder Program 0 marks
little competence and competence and descriptions /2
professionalism professionalism - rungs are documented
appropriately with concise
comments
- code/program is well
structured read

III. OBJECTIVE OF ASSIGNMENT / WHAT WENT WELL

2 marks
0.5 marks 1 mark
Response to III - succinctly describes what
- limited effectiveness at - somewhat effective
(your experience was accomplished in the lab
0 marks describing what was at describing what was
with the
accomplished in the lab accomplished in the
- a reader unfamiliar with the lab /2
assignment) would have a clear idea of
assignment lab assignment
what was accomplished

IV. CONCLUSION / WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN IMPROVED

2 marks
- demonstrates an exemplary
amount of critical thinking &
Response to IV 0.5 marks 1 mark
analysis
(suggestions/impr - demonstrates limited - demonstrates a fair
0 marks
critical thinking & amount of critical
- well communicated response /2
ovements about - a reader unfamiliar with the lab
the assignments) analysis thinking & analysis
would have a clear idea of
what was lacking and how it
could have been improved

V. DOCUMENTATION OF STEPS / PROCEDURES

0.5 marks 1 mark 2 marks
- demonstrates limited - demonstrates a fair - demonstrates an exemplary
Response to IV 0 marks
number of amount of steps/ amount of steps/procedures /2
steps/procedures procedures

Penalty (if applicable, e.g. illegible handwriting, incorrect/inaccurate information, late submission etc.) –

TOTAL / 10