0% found this document useful (0 votes)
81 views32 pages

Thesis Graph

Uploaded by

jay dewanagn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
81 views32 pages

Thesis Graph

Uploaded by

jay dewanagn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

80

70

60

50
Percentage

40

30

20

10

0
15 years 16 years 17 years male female joint nuclear
Demographical details

Fig. 4.1: Graphical representation of Demographical details of Adolescents


35

30

25
Percentage

20

Male
15
Female

10

0
Upper High High Upper Middle Lower Middle Poor Very Poor
Socio economic status

Fig. 4.2: Graphical representation of Socio-Economic


Socio Status of Adolescents
25

20

15
Percentage

Upper High
High
10
Upper Middle
Lower Middle
5

0
Addicted Male Addicted Female Not addicted Male Not addicted
Female
Multimedia addiction

Fig.. 4.3: Percentage of Multimedia Addiction based on Gender and SES


130

125

120
Mean

115

110

105
Male Female
Mean score of Multimedia addiction

Fig. 4.4:: Mean score of Multimedia A


Addiction as a function of Gender differences
70

60

50
Percentage

40
Male
30 Female

20

10

0
Mild Moderate Severe Not addicted
Internet addiction

Fig. 4.5: Extent of Internet Addiction among Adolescents


60

50

40
Percentage

Male
30
Female

20

10

0
Addicted Not addicted
Mobile addiction

Fig. 4.6:: Graphical representation of Mobile Addiction among Adolescents


100

90

80

70

60
Percentage

50 Male
Female
40

30

20

10

0
Addicted Not addicted
Television addiction

Fig. 4.7: Graphical representation of Television Addiction among Adolescents


90

80

70

60
Percentage

50
Male
40 Female

30

20

10

0
Addicted Not addicted
Video game addiction

Fig. 4.8: Graphical representation of Video game Addiction among Adolescents


60

50

40
Percentage

30 Male
Female

20

10

0
Less than two Two More than two More than three
Position of multimedia

Fig. 4.9: Multimedia Addiction among Adolescents


100

95

90
Mean

Male
85 Female

80

75
Addicted Non-addicted
Interaction effect of Neuroticism

Fig. 4.10: Interaction effect of Neuroticism (N) Personality Dimension as a function of Addiction and Gender
100

98

96

94

92

90
Mean

Male
88 Female
86

84

82

80

78
Addicted Not addicted
Mean score of Neuroticism

Fig. 4.11:: Mean score of Neuroticism (N) Personality Dimension as a function of Addiction and Gende
Gender
130

125

120
Mean

Male
115
Female

110

105

100
Addicted Not addicted
Mean score of Extraversion

Fig. 4.12:: Mean score of Extraversion (E) Personality Dimension as a function of Addiction and Gender
116

114

112

110

108
Mean

Male
106
Female
104

102

100

98

96
Addicted Not addicted
Mean score of Openness

Fig. 4.13:: Mean score of Openness (O) Personality Dimension as a function of Addiction and Gender
120

115

110
Mean

Male
105 Female

100

95
Addicted Non-addicted
Interaction effect of Agreeableness

Fig. 4.14: Interaction effect of Agreeableness (A) Personality Dimension as a function of Addiction and Gender
120

115

110
Mean

Male

105 Female

100

95
Addicted Not addicted
Mean score of Agreeableness

Fig. 4.15:: Mean score of Agreeableness (A) Personality Dimension as a function of Addiction and Gender
135

130

125

120
Mean

Male
115 Female

110

105

100
Addicted Not addicted
Mean score of Conscientiousness

Fig. 4.16:: Mean score of Conscientiousness (C) Personality Dimension as a function of Addiction and Gen
Gender
60

50

40
Percentage

30 Mild
Moderate
Severe
20

10

0
Pre Male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.17:: Extent of Internet Addiction after Intervention


70

60

50

40 Upper High
Mean

High
30
Upper Middle
Lower Middle
20

10

0
Pre male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post condition

Fig. 4.21:: Mean score of Internet Addiction as a function of Pre-Post


Pre Post Condition, Gender and SES
90

80

70

60
Percentage

50 Male

40 Female

30

20

10

0
Pre Post
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.18:: Extent of Mobile Addiction after Intervention


80

70

60

50
Upper High
Mean

40
High
Upper Middle
30
Lower Middle

20

10

0
Pre Male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.22:: Mean score of Mobile Addiction as a function of Pre


Pre-Post
Post Condition, Gender and SES
18

16

14

12
Percentage

10 Male
8 Female

0
Pre Post
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.19:: Extent of Television Addiction after Intervention


30

25

20

Upper High
Mean

15
High
Upper Middle
10 Lower Middle

0
Pre Male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.23:: Mean score of Television addiction as a function of Pre


Pre-Post
Post Condition, Gender and SES
50

45

40

35

30
Percentage

Male
25
Female
20

15

10

0
Pre Post
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.20: Extent of Video game Addiction after Intervention


16

14

12

10
Upper High
Mean

8 High
Upper Middle
6
Lower Middle

0
Pre Male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.24:: Mean score of Video game Addiction as a function of Pre-Post


Pre Post Condition, Gender and SES
120

100

80
Mean

Upper High
60
High
Upper Middle
40
Lower Middle

20

0
Pre Male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.25: Interaction effect of Neuroticism (N) Personality Dimension as a function of Pre-Post Condition, Gender and SES
120

100

80

Upper High
Mean

60
High
Upper Middle
40 Lower Middle

20

0
Pre Male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.26:: Mean score of Neuroticism (N) Personality Dimension as a function of Pre-Post
Pre Post Condition, Gender and SES
125

120

115

Upper High
Mean

110
High
Upper Middle
105 Lower Middle

100

95
Pre Male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.27:: Mean score of Extraversion (E) as a function of Pre


Pre-Post Condition, Gender and SES
140

120

100

80
Mean

Upper High
High
60
Upper Middle
Lower Middle
40

20

0
Pre Male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.28: Interaction effect of Openness (O) Personality Dimension as a function of Pre-Post Condition, Gender and SES
120

100

80

Upper High
Mean

60
High
Upper Middle
40 Lower Middle

20

0
Pre Male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.29:: Mean score of Openness (O) as a function of Pre-Post


Pre Post Condition, Gender and SES
120

100

80

Upper High
Mean

60 High
Upper Middle
40 Lower Middle

20

0
Pre Male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.30:: Mean score of Agreeableness (A) as a function of Pre-Post


Pre Post Condition, Gender and SES
120

115

110

Upper High
Mean

105 High
Upper Middle
100 Lower Middle

95

90
Pre Male Pre Female Post Male Post Female
Pre and Post Condition

Fig. 4.31: Mean score of Conscientiousness (C) as a function of Pre


Pre-Post
Post Condition, Gender and SES

You might also like