Pattern Grammar, Language Teaching
Pattern Grammar, Language Teaching
KEYWORDS ""
WIDTH "150"
VOFFSET "4">
Chapter 9
Susan Hunston
University of Birmingham
2. Pattern grammar
To this we might add that, when observing raw corpus data, traditional gram-
matical categories (such as ‘direct object’, ‘indirect object’, ‘noun clause’ and
‘extraposed clause’) might be unnecessary or even unhelpful (Hunston &
Francis 1998; 1999).
A pattern is a sequence of grammar words, word types or clause types which
co-occur with a given lexical item. An item may be said to control or ‘have’ a
pattern if the pattern occurs frequently and is dependent on the item in
question. Patterns are observable through concordance lines, though intuition
is also involved in deciding on dependency. Below are sets of concordance lines
for the verb decide, showing the patterns this verb controls.1 (For reasons of
space, only five lines for each pattern are shown: this masks the comparative
frequency of the patterns).
V that
when Bartoli was a free agent, he decided all he had to do was play a
jobs. The letter reads: ‘I have decided it is necessary to draw your
s postwar ‘economic miracle”. MITI decided that the computer industry ha
on World War II until in college I decided that I wanted to become a Mar
with infertility treatment, Lorna ‘decided that it really didn’t matter
V wh
another face, for a while. I must decide if I want my old one, or a nic
pregnancy” not Profet’s list to decide what’s best for her. Willi
are in Minnesota as tourists. They decided what they wanted to do and wh
to sent short messages and Glen decides whether or not he’s going to
A trial is set for December 4 to decide who will get permanent custody
170 Susan Hunston
V wh to-inf
of the issues facing charities when deciding how to utilise their investm
would be. When you’re a teenager, deciding what to do with your life, y
who, before Royan last week, had not decided whether to start Almox Ratina
up to the state attorney general to decide whether to appeal the judge’s
demolished.” The bank must now decide whether to sell the building,
V to-inf
So the churchwardens have decided no longer to pay the quota, a
Register office wedding. People decide to marry at a register office
the parents. <M01> And what did you decide to study? <M02>I-
ovulatory problems). When a couple decides to have a child, it is a decisio
availability of the plants. So he decided to start his own nursery, from
be V-ed
blabbered.’ The itinerary was decided at the highest level. The Hom
cus race in Santa Cruz County that was decided by 25 votes. There were, you
interpreters, the matter may be decided for you by the coupling.
Allende’s election itself was decided in the Chilean congress again
1), 7-5, 6-3. The match will be decided tomorrow,” he said of the dou
it be V-ed that
of the Battle of Britain. So it was decided that the celebrations would be
babes. For some reason, it was decided that the latest from the Mexican
completely done by now, but it was decided that rather than put Brett in da
give up his life so easily. It was decided that the only place to treat him
out from monetary union it has been decided that eight different coins will
To show the range of words that might control one pattern, below are
concordance lines showing some of the adjectives occurring in the pattern it
v-link ADJ that (referred to in Biber et al 1999 as an extraposed that-clause).
(Again for reasons of space, only a maximum of two lines for each adjective are
shown.)
ill Constable Jones, Mr Casey said It is apparent that fate intervened th
orses. Elegance being a key factor, it was appropriate that Joanne
all I can tell you.” From his tone it was clear that Dick Ryle had had
in Mecca to perform the haj. It is clear that the revolution in mas
National Union of Students said that it is crucial that universities give a
only to add the fateful words: ‘But it is essential that we end it in such
e Woodgate Valley Country Park, and it was fitting that two of the city’s
health clinic, or any hospital. It is important that the woman
is sewn up is not so important; but it is important that North Korea should
impossible. At the same time it is inevitable that those at home,
ters to Stick Letters <p> I suppose it was inevitable that this passionate
him to act so out of character? It was ironic that Penelope’s insistence
co-operation, however he said it was likely that Germany would have t
is a lethal muscle wasting disease. It is likely that any child with this
ll enjoyment of this exquisite poem, it is necessary that the reader should
a camera attached and working. It is obvious that the chance of a
which it had been contracted here, it was obvious that that was not what
<M02> And we asked them and it was overwhelming that- the the
portant parts of every relationship. It is possible that your partner’s mil
s a template for building proteins — it is possible that the FraX protein h
exchange transactions in London. It is revealing that the Socialists wh
st past the end of the year. Indeed it was significant that the Jakarta
n euthanasia is a guess at best. It is surprising that, following an
others. <p> Some doctors have said it is suspicious that the pills named
s ever as simple as presented. While it is true that vertical integration
Europe will require a high-wire act. It is true that Malcolm Rifkind, the
Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation 171
et to him, but he couldn’t help it. It was typical that Robyn would have
who said: ‘In a civilised society, it is unacceptable that women are
in this Year of Remembrance. It is unfortunate that the article made
anti-government protests. He said it was unfortunate that a number of
More recent work has suggested that it is unlikely that family boundary
to testify. In retrospect, it is unlikely that a US court would
Below are individual examples of words and their patterns (in each case the
word with the pattern is underlined; in the coding, the symbol for the word
with the pattern is in capitals):
i. Crowds of near hysterical men jostled their way through to try to find news
of their wives and families. V way prep/adv
ii. He instructed family members in nursing techniques. V n in n
iii. Japan’s industrial output increased by 2%. V by amount
iv. The mood in Japan is changing and candidates want to identify themselves
with reform. V pron-refl with n
v. I can be very rude to motorists who hoot at me. V at n
vi. It’s an honour to finally work with her. it v-link N to-inf
vii. He was too high on drugs and alcohol to remember them. ADJ on n
viii. Do they have a chance of beating Australia? N of -ing
ix. We played that record all night long. n ADV
x. …a thinly disguised attack ADV -ed
xi. There’d be no telling how John would react to such news as this. DET n as n
xii. She let the dogs into the house and fed them. v PRON
2. attempts to do or get something: attempt, bash, chance, crack, effort, go, shot,
stab, tilt, try
Mr Downer said that he may one day get another chance at the leadership.
3. looking at someone or something, physically or metaphorically: glance,
glimpse, look, peek, smile
The island is bigger than a first glance at the map indicates.
4. someone is good or experienced at a particular activity: dab hand, expert,
genius, master, novice, old hand, past master, whizz, wizard
Dickens was a genius at creating characters of great depth and this film is
peppered with them.
5. critical comments: dig, protest, side-swipe
It’s a none-too-subtle dig at the officials of the Brisbane and Canberra clubs.
3.1 Accuracy
Patterns are important to language production in terms of both accuracy and
fluency. Even advanced learners tend to have imperfect control over patterns;
in fact, in the case of very advanced learners, pattern use is perhaps the greatest
source of a sense of non-idiomaticity in English. Below are some examples, with
the kind of advice the teacher might offer, based on the association of pattern
and meaning.
Teachers … discourage students to try to use the target language to express their
own ideas.
The verb discourage is not used with this pattern (though its opposite encourage
is). The correct pattern is ‘verb + noun + from + -ing’, so the phrase should read
discourage students from trying…. The teacher could point out that discourage is
similar in meaning to stop and prevent, which have the same pattern.
Criminals will find it difficult to evade from being arrested.
174 Susan Hunston
The verb evade is not used with this pattern (though escape is). The most likely
alternative is evade arrest (with the pattern ‘verb + noun’). The pattern ‘verb +
-ing’ is also possible (evade being arrested) but is much less frequent. The better-
known verb avoid also has these two patterns.
Not all undergraduates are given the privilege to stay in university accommodation.
The noun privilege is rarely used with this pattern (though the pattern ‘it + link
verb + noun + to infinitive’, as in It’s a privilege to meet you, is common). Much
more frequently found is the pattern ‘noun + of + -ing’ (the privilege of staying).
The nouns advantage, benefit, distinction, gift, honour, luxury and pleasure are
also used with this pattern.
3.2 Fluency
Control over patterns can be said to aid fluency as well as accuracy. This is
because if a word with its pattern has been learnt the learner can produce, not
just one word, but a series of words, a phrase, together. A single mental effort
produces a whole string of language. For example, here is a native speaker of
English talking about his addiction to cigarettes:
Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation 175
My nan sometimes says to me that I get really moody when I don’t have a cigarette
and I keep snapping at her she says but I try not to do it but I just keep doing it
and then she gives me a cigarette.
Each of the verbs in this short extract has a pattern, which translates into a
recognisable phrase:
say V to n that says to me that
get V adj get really moody
have Vn don’t have a cigarette
keep V — ing keep snapping; keep doing
snap V at n snapping at her
try V to-inf try not to do
do Vn do it; doing it
give Vnn gives me a cigarette
Together, these phrases, which are not fixed lexically but are not random
either, make up a large proportion of the utterance. The speaker has produced a
novel utterance by putting together patterns belonging to the individual words
that are used. So, although a learner may never have heard or said keep snapping
at her before, it can be produced without hesitation by putting together the
pattern of keep (keep snapping) with the pattern of snap (snapping at her).
One way of interpreting fluency is as what has been called ‘pattern flow’.
When a word that is part of a pattern has a pattern of its own, the result is flow
from one pattern to the other. It is possible to show this diagrammatically, as in
the example below.
In this example, the lexical items tend, think, wrong and arm demonstrate a
typical behaviour. This gives the sequence I tend to think that it’d be wrong a sense
of naturalness and familiarity, such as might be associated with a fixed phrase that
is chosen by the speaker as a single item, rather than being constructed from the
raw materials of lexis and grammar. Yet the sequence is not frequently met (there
are no instances in the Bank of English corpus). It is not a single choice but
might be seen as a series of choices, each arising from the one before.
176 Susan Hunston
3.4 Consciousness-raising
Exercises designed to raise learners’ awareness of pattern can involve pieces of
language taken out of context. Such exercises have the benefit of traditional
parsing exercises in that they encourage learners to identify the parts that make
up a sentence, but because they require recognition of surface features only
they make far fewer demands in terms of metalanguage. They also direct
attention to specific items such as individual prepositions as well as to general
categories such as ‘noun’. Here is one such exercise, with the instructions to
learners given first:
Here are two sets of sentences. Each sentence from the first set matches one from the second
set in that the word in bold has the same pattern. Match up the two sets. (For example,
sentence 1c matches 2a because in both the verb is followed by of and a noun — died of a
heart attack and complained of a headache.)
Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation 177
Look at what you have written in Column 1. What kind of things do these words describe?
Look at what you have written in Column 4. What kind of things do these words describe?
178 Susan Hunston
The security door left the captain and the crew stuck in the cabin.
The work on identifying patterns to date has been done manually,3 most of it
by lexicographers compiling the Collins Cobuild English Dictionary (1995).
The patterns of around 20,000 words are given in that dictionary and/or in the
two major volumes of the ‘pattern grammar’ series. Now that this ground-
word has been done, it is a tractable problem to automate the identification of
patterns in running text. That is, a program can be written which, on
encountering a word, can check what patterns that word may have, and thus
can identify the elements of the pattern in the text (Mason and Hunston 2001).
There are various possible applications of this. Firstly, and most obviously, the
comparative frequency of patterns with individual lexical items can be
calculated. This would extend the work done in Biber et al (1998) which
compares, for example, the frequency of begin followed by a to-infinitive and
followed by an ‘-ing’ clause. Secondly, the relative frequency of different
patterns in various registers can be calculated. This would extend the work
described in Biber et al (1999) on complementation clauses, allowing a more
complete picture of verb, noun and adjective behaviour to emerge.
Finally, the connection between pattern and meaning opens the possibility
of quantifying ways of expressing meanings in different registers via the
concept of ‘local grammar’ (Barnbrook and Sinclair 1995; Hunston and
Sinclair 2000). A local grammar is a grammar that seeks to account for, not the
whole of a language, but one meaning only. One example is a grammar of
definitions (Barnbrook and Sinclair 1995), another is a grammar of evaluation
Pattern grammar, language teaching, and linguistic variation 179
(Hunston and Sinclair 2000). A grammar currently being written is that for
‘cause and effect’ (Allen 1999). Below are some examples of analysed expres-
sions of cause and effect. In each case, a sentence expressing causality is parsed
into semantic elements (‘cause’, ‘effect’ and ‘observer’). The parsing can be
done because a pattern is recognized along with one of a number of verbs or
nouns which use that pattern to express causality. In the first example, for
instance, identification of the verb lead with the pattern ‘noun1 + verb + noun2
+ to-infinitive’ is followed by a mapping of the meaning elements on to the
pattern (where ‘noun1’ = ‘cause’; ‘noun2 + to-infinitive’ = ‘effect’), allowing
the analysis to be made.
Drugs are certainly the cause of much crime but a large part of this is because of
their illegality.
Drugs = CAUSE
Much crime = EFFECT
IDENTIFYING PATTERN = noun…be…the cause of…noun
POSSIBLE NOUNS: agent; benefit; cause; consequence; effect; fruits; generator;
implications; legacy; outcome; product; result; root; secret; source
The effect of radiation is to shift the transition from ductile to brittle behaviour
to a higher temperature.
Radiation = CAUSE
Shift the transition…to a higher temperature = EFFECT
IDENTIFYING PATTERN = the effect of…noun…be…to-inf
POSSIBLE NOUNS: effect; result
180 Susan Hunston
The final exam determines whether you can sit for university entrance or not.
The final exam = CAUSE
Whether you can sit for university entrance or not = EFFECT
IDENTIFYING PATTERN = determine … wh
POSSIBLE VERBS: decide, determine, define, dictate, influence
Once a complete grammar of cause and effect is available, all instances can be
identified in a large corpus, and the frequency of instances in different registers
can be calculated.
An example may be given from a less complex meaning-type than cause and
effect (less complex in terms of the range of patterns used): the meaning
‘abstain from an action’ (see Francis et al 1996: 619–620). Typical realisations of
this meaning include:
‘verb + -ing’, with verbs such as avoid and (not) bother, as in avoided doing
the washing-up;
‘verb + to-infinitive’, with verbs such as (not) bother, fail, forget and refuse,
as in failed to do the washing-up;
‘verb + about + -ing’, with verbs such as forget and (not) bother, as in forgot
about doing the washing-up;
‘verb + from + noun or -ing’, with verbs such as abstain, desist, flinch,
recoil, refrain and shrink, as in refrained from house-work/doing the washing-
up;
‘verb + out of + noun or -ing’, with verbs such as drop, get and opt, as in
opted out of doing the washing-up.
corpus there are 436.4 instances per million words, taking all the
patterns together. The comparable figure for the spoken corpus is 85.
ii. Overall, the patterns with prepositions are less frequent than those with
non-finite clauses. The total frequency per million words over both
corpora is 135.4 for patterns with prepositions and 386 for patterns
with clauses. In both corpora, the patterns with a to-infinitive are more
frequent than any other group.
iii. The patterns with prepositions are especially infrequent in spoken
English. For example, the verbs with from occur a total of only 3.7 times
per million words. Many of the target verbs are not found in those
patterns at all in the spoken corpus. An exception to this general rule is
the expression GET out of, which occurs 34.3 times per million words
in the spoken corpus. In the Guardian corpus, most of the verb-pattern
combinations are found. Some of them are infrequent, but the relative-
ly large number of verbs pushes up the overall frequency. The verbs
with from, for example, occur a total of 36.4 times per million words.
iv. These verb-pattern combinations are much more frequent in the
Guardian than in the spoken corpus: ‘avoid + -ing’; ‘decline + to-
infinitive’; ‘fail + to-infinitive’; ‘refuse + to-infinitive’; ‘refrain + from +
n/ing’; ‘opt + out of + n/ing’.
v. These verb-pattern combinations are much more frequent in the spoken
corpus than in the Guardian corpus: ‘(not) bother + -ing’; ‘forget + to-
infinitive’; ‘(not) bother + about + n/ing’; ‘get + out of + n/ing’.
5. Conclusion
Notes
1. Concordance lines and examples are taken from the Bank of English corpus, currently
standing at over 400 million words, and jointly owned by HarperCollins publishers and the
University of Birmingham.
2. All examples appear to be from native speakers. Three examples occur in Australian
newspapers, suggesting a possibility that the pattern may stem from a regional variety. The
other examples come from books published in Britain (1), books published in the US (1),
and a British tabloid newspaper (1).
3. ‘Manually’ here means that the researchers examined the concordance lines and collo-
cational information for each word in turn, or for each pattern in turn. To this extent the
search was computer-assisted, but was not automatic.
References
Allen, C. 1999. A local grammar of cause and effect. Unpublished MA dissertation, Universi-
ty of Birmingham.
Barnbrook, G. and Sinclair, J. M. 1995. “Parsing Cobuild Entries”. In The Languages of
Definition: The Formalization of Dictionary Definitions for Natural Language Processing,
J. M. Sinclair, M. Hoelter and C. Peters (eds), 13–58. Luxembourg: Office for Official
Publications of the European Community.
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Reppen, R. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language
Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of
Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Francis, G., Hunston, S. and Manning, E. 1996. Collins Cobuild Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs.
London: HarperCollins.
Francis, G., Manning, E. and Hunston, S. 1997. Verbs: Patterns and Practice. London:
HarperCollins.
Francis, G., Hunston, S. and Manning, E. 1998. Collins Cobuild Grammar Patterns 2: Nouns
and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.
Hornby, A. S. 1954. A Guide to Patterns and Usage in English. London: OUP.
Hudson, R. 1984. Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hunston, S. and Francis, G. 1998. “Verbs observed: a corpus-driven pedagogic grammar”.
Applied Linguistics 19: 45–72.
Hunston, S. and Francis, G. 1999. Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical
Grammar of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hunston S. and Sinclair J. M. 2000. ‘A local grammar of evaluation’. In Hunston S. and
Thompson G. (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of
Discourse, 75–101. Oxford: OUP.
Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press.
</TARGET "hun">
Lewis, M. 1993. The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward. Hove: LTP.
Long, M. H. and Crooks, G. 1992. “Three approaches to task-based syllabus design” TESOL
Quarterly 26: 27–56.
Mason, O. and Hunston S. 2001. “The automatic recognition of verbs patterns: a feasibility
study”. Paper read at the COMPLEX conference, University of Birmingham, 2001.
Rudanko, J. 1996. Prepositions and Complement Clauses: a Syntactic and Semantic Study of
Verbs Governing Prepositions and Complement Clauses in Present-day English. New York:
State University of New York Press.
Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus Concordance Collocation. Oxford: OUP.
Willis, D. 1990. Lexical Syllabuses. London: HarperCollins.
Willis D. and Willis J. 1996. “Consciousness-raising activities”. In Challenge and Change in
Language Teaching, J. Willis and D. Willis (eds), 63–76. Oxford: Heinemann.