COMPARISON OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES IN PUBLIC

AND PRIVATE SECTOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN

DISTRICT KARAK

BY

MATEEN ULLAH
REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2022-UB-HCEMS-133137

Roll No: 79744

HASNAIN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION & MANAGEMENT SCIENCES BANNU

At Department elementary Teacher Education

FACULTY OF EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BANNU

 COMPARISON OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
SECTOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN DISTRICT KARAK

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Bachelor in Education 1.5 Years

BY

MATEEN ULLAH
REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2022-UB-HCEMS-133137

Roll No: 79744

HASNAIN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION & MANAGEMENT SCIENCES BANNU

UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BANNU

2024

Faculty of Education

UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BANNU

2
 DECLARATION
I MATEEN ULLAH S/O ARSHAD IQBAL
Registration 2022-UB-HCEMS-133137 Roll No: 79744 student of [Link]. (1.5 year) program
(Teacher Education) at UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BANNU do hereby
solemnly declare that the research project proposal entitled

COMPARISON OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR ELEMENTARY

SCHOOLS IN DISTRICT KARAK

submitted by me impartial fulfillment of [Link]. (1.5 year) program, is my original work, and
has not been submitted or published earlier. I also solemnly declare that it shall not, in
future, be submitted by me for obtaining any other degree from this or any other university
or institution.

I also understand that if evidence of plagiarism is found in my thesis/dissertation at any

stage, even after the award of a degree, the work may be cancelled and the degree
revoked.

Date: August 11, 2024

MATEEN ULLAH

3
 CERTIFICATION

Certified that the contents and form of thesis “COMPARISON OF

LEARNING ACTIVITIES IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN DISTRICT KARAK” submitted by Mr.
MATEEN ULLAH, have been found satisfactory for the
requirements of the degree Bachelor of Education (1.5 years).

Supervisor:
____________________
(Dr. GULAP SHAHZADA)

____________________
External Examiner:

Dated:

_______________________________
Director: (Institute of Education and Research)

4
 DEDICATION
I dedicate this thesis to my beloved parents, whose unwavering
support and encouragement have been my greatest source of
strength throughout my educational journey. Their sacrifices and
love have been the foundation of my achievements, and I am
eternally grateful for their belief in my potential.

To my teachers and mentors, who have guided me with wisdom

and patience, I owe a deep debt of gratitude. Your dedication to
my learning and growth has inspired me to strive for excellence,
and this work is a testament to your influence.

Lastly, I dedicate this thesis to the future educators and students

of our community. May the knowledge and insights gained from
this work contribute to the betterment of our educational
system and inspire others to pursue their dreams with passion
and perseverance. This is for everyone who believes in the
power of education to change lives.

MATEEN ULLAH

5
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

This thesis is dedicated to my beloved father, who left this world on the 22nd
of October, 2023. Words cannot express the depth of the void left in my heart
by his absence. Throughout my life, he was my greatest source of strength, my
guide, and my biggest supporter. His love, wisdom, and belief in me have been
the foundation of all that I have accomplished.

Though he is no longer physically with me, I carry his spirit, values, and lessons
in everything I do. This work is a testament to his encouragement and
sacrifices, which have shaped me into the person I am today.

Dad, I miss you every day, and I wish you were here to share this moment with
me. Your memory will always be my motivation, and I hope to make you proud
with every step I take.

Rest in peace, Dad. This is for you.

MATEEN ULLAH

6
 CONTENT

Page No

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background Of Study 10
1.2 Statement Of The Problem 13
1.3 Objective Of The Study 15
1.4 Research Question 17
1.5 Significance Of The Study 18
1.6 Delimitation Of The Study 20

2. REVIEW AND RELATED LITERATURE

2.1 Background and Context 23
2.2 Overview of Learning Activities 23
2.3 Public Sector Schools 24
2.4 Private Sector Schools 25
2.5. The Role Of Assessment In Learning Activities 26
2.6 Parental Involvement In Education 27
2.7 Challenges And Opportunities In Implementing Educational Strategie 28
2.8 Comparative Analysis: Public Vs. Private Sector Schools 29
2.9. Implications For Policy And Practice 30

3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Design 31
3.2 Sample Selection 32
3.3 Data Collection Instruments 33
3.4 Data Analysis 37
3.5 Data Management Plan 39
3.6 Pilot Testing 40
3.7 Ethical Considerations 41
3.8 Resources For Methodology 43

4. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
1. Student Enrollment: Public vs. Private Schools 45
2. Teacher Qualification Levels 45
7
3. Student-to-Teacher Ratio 46
4. Learning Activities: Lecture, Group Work, Project-Based Learning 47
5. Use of Technology in Learning 47
6. Assessment Methods: Frequency of Exams, Projects, and Quizzes 48
7. Student Performance: Average Pass Rate 48

4. FINDING, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION

4.1 Finding 49
5.2 Conclusion 58
5.3 Recommendations 61
5.4 Summary 63

Annex - A
References 64
Annex - B
Questioner 65

8
 ABSTRACT

The activity-based method of teaching plays a crucial role at the elementary level in both
public and private schools. Schools that employ activity-based learning techniques tend to
achieve better outcomes compared to those that rely on traditional methods of instruction.
Through the implementation of Activity-Based Learning (ABL), students demonstrate higher
levels of understanding and retention. This approach is particularly effective in simplifying
complex concepts, making them more accessible and easier to grasp for young learners. In
an activity-based learning environment, students engage with concepts through hands-on
experimentation and practical application, which significantly enhances their
comprehension and retention. The effectiveness of this method is reflected in the notably
higher learning outcomes achieved when compared to traditional teaching methods.

This study seeks to evaluate and compare the academic performance of students in public
and private schools within the district of Karak, located in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
province. The research specifically focuses on the impact of activity-based teaching methods
versus traditional instructional approaches. By examining the methods employed in both
public and private schools, the study aims to shed light on the effectiveness of these
pedagogical strategies.

To conduct this research, students from both public and private schools were selected as
the study population. The sample was chosen using a stratified random sampling procedure
to ensure a representative selection from each type of school. Data was collected through
direct observation and assessment techniques, focusing on the use of activity-based
teaching methods in the selected schools. The study considered variables such as the
number of study hours and the specific teaching methods used in both public and private
schools. The collected data was then analyzed to draw meaningful findings and conclusions
regarding the effectiveness of activity-based learning compared to traditional teaching
methods. The results of this analysis will contribute to a better understanding of how
different teaching approaches influence student learning outcomes in he region.

Unit 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Expanding the provided text to over 4000 words involves a detailed exploration of each
section, incorporating background information, literature review, statistical analysis, and

9
additional considerations for policymakers, educators, and parents. Below is an extended
version of your text:

• Need for the Study

The education sector in Pakistan is undergoing significant scrutiny and transformation,
especially in light of the challenges it faces in delivering quality education. One of the most
pressing concerns is the disparity in the quality of education provided by public schools
compared to private institutions. This disparity has long been a topic of debate among
educators, policymakers, and parents alike, highlighting the urgent need to address the
growing concerns surrounding public education.

In many parts of Pakistan, including the district of Karak, public schools often struggle to
meet the educational standards expected by both the community and the national
curriculum. Issues such as outdated teaching methods, lack of resources, and overcrowded
classrooms are common in public schools. These challenges are not unique to Karak but are
reflective of a broader issue affecting public education across the country.

On the other hand, private schools in Karak, as in many other regions, have seen a steady
increase in their numbers and enrollment figures. This rise in private schooling is a trend
observed nationwide and is often attributed to the perception that private schools offer a
superior education compared to their public counterparts. Parents are increasingly turning
to private institutions, believing that these schools provide better learning environments,
more personalized attention, and a greater focus on modern educational practices.

This growing preference for private education raises several important questions about the
nature and effectiveness of the learning activities provided in both public and private
schools. Are private schools indeed offering better educational experiences? How do the
learning activities differ between the two sectors, and what impact do these differences
have on student learning outcomes?

Understanding these dynamics is crucial, not just for educators and policymakers but also
for the broader community. The quality of education that children receive at the elementary
level sets the foundation for their future academic success and overall development.
Therefore, it is essential to critically examine the differences in educational practices
between public and private schools, particularly in regions like Karak, where the educational
landscape is rapidly changing.

This study aims to address these critical questions by evaluating and comparing the learning
activities employed in public and private schools in the Karak district. By doing so, it seeks to
provide a clearer picture of how these activities influence student learning outcomes and to
identify potential areas for improvement in both sectors.

• Educational Disparity and Resource Gaps

While Pakistan boasts a national curriculum designed to provide a standardized education
across the country, there is significant evidence suggesting that the implementation of this
curriculum varies widely between public and private schools. This disparity is a source of
concern for educators and policymakers alike, as it underscores the inequalities that exist
within the education system.

10
Public schools in Pakistan, particularly those in rural areas like Karak, often operate under
severe resource constraints. These schools typically have larger class sizes, which can make
it difficult for teachers to provide individualized attention to students. Additionally, public
schools frequently lack access to modern educational materials and technology, further
hindering their ability to offer diverse and engaging learning activities.

For instance, the lack of access to basic resources such as textbooks, teaching aids, and
laboratory equipment can severely limit the types of learning activities that can be
implemented in public schools. This is particularly problematic when it comes to subjects
that require hands-on experimentation and interactive learning, such as science and
mathematics. Without the necessary resources, teachers in public schools may be forced to
rely on traditional, lecture-based teaching methods, which are often less effective in
engaging students and fostering deep understanding.

In contrast, private schools generally have more resources at their disposal. These schools
often have smaller class sizes, which allows for more personalized instruction and greater
flexibility in the types of learning activities that can be offered. Furthermore, private schools
are more likely to have access to modern technology, such as computers, projectors, and
interactive whiteboards, which can be used to enhance the learning experience.

The resource gap between public and private schools is not just about physical materials
and technology; it also extends to the availability of trained and motivated teachers. Private
schools often have the financial means to attract and retain better-qualified teachers, who
may be more familiar with modern pedagogical practices and more capable of
implementing a variety of learning activities. In contrast, public schools may struggle to
attract and retain qualified teachers, particularly in remote areas like Karak, where the
working conditions can be challenging.

This disparity in resources and teacher quality between public and private schools has
significant implications for the types of learning activities that can be implemented and,
ultimately, for student learning outcomes. The differences in the educational environment
between public and private schools raise important questions about equity and access to
quality education for all students, regardless of their socio-economic background.

• Importance of Effective Learning Activities

Research in the field of education consistently highlights the importance of effective
learning activities in fostering student engagement, enhancing knowledge retention, and
developing critical thinking skills. At the elementary level, where students are laying the
foundation for their future academic success, the types of learning activities employed can
have a profound impact on their overall development.

Effective learning activities are those that are designed to engage students actively in the
learning process, rather than passively receiving information. These activities encourage
students to think critically, solve problems, and apply what they have learned in meaningful
ways. By catering to diverse learning styles and preferences, effective learning activities can
help ensure that all students have the opportunity to succeed, regardless of their individual
strengths and weaknesses.

11
One of the key aspects of effective learning activities is student engagement. Research has
shown that students who are actively engaged in the learning process are more likely to
retain information and develop a deeper understanding of the material. Engagement can be
fostered through a variety of activities, including hands-on experiments, simulations,
problem-solving tasks, and group projects. These activities not only make learning more
interesting and enjoyable for students but also help them develop important skills such as
collaboration, communication, and critical thinking.

Another important aspect of effective learning activities is the use of student-centered

approaches. Traditional teaching methods, which are often teacher-directed and lecture-
based, can limit students’ opportunities to explore and discover on their own. In contrast,
student-centered approaches, such as inquiry-based learning, place students at the center
of the learning process. In these approaches, students are encouraged to ask questions,
conduct research, and draw their conclusions, fostering a sense of ownership and
responsibility for their learning.

Variety and differentiation are also crucial components of effective learning activities.
Different students have different learning styles, and what works for one student may not
work for another. By incorporating a variety of activities into the curriculum, teachers can
cater to the diverse needs of their students and keep them engaged throughout the learning
process. This might include a mix of lectures, discussions, group work, independent study,
technology integration, and project-based learning. Effective teachers also differentiate
instruction to accommodate various learning styles within the classroom, ensuring that all
students have the opportunity to succeed.

In the context of this study, it is important to examine how these principles of effective
learning activities are being implemented in both public and private schools in Karak. Are
private schools more likely to use student-centered approaches? Do public schools struggle
to offer a variety of activities due to resource constraints? These are critical questions that
this research seeks to answer.

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

• Knowledge Gap and Potential Impact

Despite the growing body of research on effective teaching practices and the importance of
engaging learning activities, there remains a significant knowledge gap regarding how these
practices are implemented in different educational contexts, particularly in regions like
Karak. There is limited understanding of how learning activities differ between public and
private schools in this district and what impact these differences have on student learning
outcomes.

This study aims to bridge this knowledge gap by conducting a comprehensive analysis of the
learning activities employed in both public and private schools in Karak. By comparing these
activities and evaluating their perceived effectiveness, the research seeks to provide
valuable insights that can inform educational practices and policies in the region.

For policymakers, the findings of this study could highlight potential areas for improvement
in the education system, particularly in terms of the learning activities offered in public
schools. If the study finds that private schools are more effective in engaging students
12
through a variety of learning activities, this could prompt a re-evaluation of resource
allocation and curriculum implementation in public schools. Policymakers might consider
initiatives to provide public schools with the necessary resources and support to implement
more effective learning activities, thereby improving educational outcomes for all students.

For educators, the insights gained from this research could serve as a valuable resource in
enhancing their teaching practices. Understanding the spectrum of learning activities used
in both public and private schools can encourage teachers to diversify their methods and
adopt more engaging approaches. This is particularly important in a region like Karak, where
teachers may face challenges due to limited resources and large class sizes. By learning from
the practices of their peers in private schools, teachers in public schools might find new
ways to overcome these challenges and improve their students’ learning experiences.

Parents also stand to benefit from the findings of this study. As they make decisions about
their children’s education, understanding the differences in learning activities between
public and private schools can provide them with valuable information to guide their
choices. If the study reveals that private schools offer a more engaging and effective
learning environment, parents may be more inclined to choose these schools for their
children. Conversely, if public schools are found to be equally effective or better in certain
aspects, parents might feel more confident in selecting a public school, especially if they are
concerned about the cost of private education.

Overall, this study has the potential to contribute significantly to improving educational
outcomes for all elementary school students in the Karak district. By fostering a deeper
understanding of the learning activities employed in both public and private schools, the
research can help identify best practices and inform strategies to enhance the quality of
education across the region. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that all students, regardless of
the type of school they attend, have access to a high-quality education that prepares them
for future success.

• Contextualizing the Educational Landscape of Karak District

To fully understand the significance of this study, it is essential to contextualize the
educational landscape of the Karak district within the broader framework of Pakistan’s
education system. Karak, a district in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, represents a
microcosm of the educational challenges and opportunities present in rural Pakistan. With
its unique socio-economic and cultural dynamics, Karak provides a valuable case study for
examining the disparities between public and private education.

Karak, like many rural areas in Pakistan, faces several socio-economic challenges that impact
the education sector. The district’s economy is primarily agrarian, with a significant portion
of the population engaged in agriculture and related activities. This economic structure
influences the priorities of families, often placing education at a lower rung compared to
more immediate concerns like livelihood and sustenance. Furthermore, the literacy rate in
Karak, while improving, still lags behind urban centers, reflecting broader national trends of
rural educational underachievement.

The public education system in Karak is characterized by a network of government-run

schools that are intended to provide free education to all children. However, these schools
often struggle with issues such as inadequate infrastructure, insufficient teaching staff, and
a lack of basic educational materials. Many public schools in the district operate with limited
13
budgets, which constrains their ability to offer a wide range of learning activities or to invest
in modern teaching aids and technologies.

Private schools, on the other hand, have been increasingly filling the gaps left by the public
education system. These schools are often seen as offering better facilities, more qualified
teachers, and a curriculum that is more aligned with modern educational standards.
However, private education comes at a cost, which can be prohibitive for many families in
Karak, particularly those from lower-income backgrounds. This creates a dichotomy in the
educational opportunities available to children based on their families’ socio-economic
status.

The proliferation of private schools in Karak mirrors a national trend, where the growth of
private education has outpaced public schooling in many areas. According to data from
Pakistan’s education department, the number of private schools has been steadily
increasing, driven by the demand for quality education that public schools are perceived to
lack. This trend is particularly pronounced in areas like Karak, where public schools face
significant challenges in delivering education that meets the expectations of parents and
communities.

The rising number of private schools in Karak raises critical questions about equity and
access to quality education. While private schools may offer superior educational
experiences, their high fees mean that they are accessible only to those who can afford
them. This creates a potential divide between students who attend private schools and
those who remain in the public system, perpetuating cycles of inequality and limiting the
opportunities for many children to reach their full potential.

This study, therefore, not only seeks to compare the learning activities employed in public
and private schools but also aims to explore the broader implications of these differences
for educational equity in the Karak district. By analyzing how these activities impact student
learning outcomes, the study will contribute to a deeper understanding of the role that
education plays in shaping the future of children in this rural district.

3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

• Theoretical Framework and Review of Literature

To ground the study within an academic framework, it is essential to review existing
literature on educational disparities, resource allocation, and the effectiveness of various
teaching methods. This literature review will provide the foundation for the study’s
methodology and analysis.

• Educational Disparities and Resource Allocation

A significant body of literature addresses the disparities in educational quality between
public and private schools, particularly in developing countries like Pakistan. Researchers
have consistently found that private schools tend to outperform public schools in various
metrics, including student achievement, teacher quality, and resource availability. These
disparities are often linked to differences in funding, management practices, and parental
involvement.

14
For instance, studies conducted in Pakistan and other South Asian countries have shown
that private schools, due to their reliance on tuition fees and other private funding sources,
are better equipped to invest in educational materials, technology, and infrastructure. This
contrasts with public schools, which depend on government funding that is often insufficient
and irregular. The resulting resource gap has significant implications for the quality of
education that students receive, particularly in rural areas where public schools are often
the only available option for many families.

• Effectiveness of Teaching Methods

The effectiveness of different teaching methods has been a subject of extensive research in
educational psychology and pedagogy. Traditional lecture-based teaching, while efficient for
conveying information to large groups of students, has been criticized for its passive nature
and its limited effectiveness in promoting deep learning and critical thinking. In contrast,
activity-based learning (ABL) and student-centered approaches have been shown to
enhance student engagement, understanding, and retention of knowledge.

Activity-based learning involves students in hands-on activities that require them to apply
concepts and skills in real-world contexts. This method is particularly effective in elementary
education, where students are still developing their cognitive abilities and need concrete
experiences to help them understand abstract concepts. Studies have found that students
who participate in activity-based learning are more likely to retain information, develop
problem-solving skills, and enjoy learning, compared to those who are taught using
traditional methods.

In the context of Pakistan, research on the implementation of ABL in schools has shown
mixed results. While some private schools have successfully integrated ABL into their
curricula, public schools have often struggled to do so, primarily due to resource constraints
and a lack of trained teachers. This has led to calls for more significant investment in teacher
training and educational resources to support the widespread adoption of ABL in public
schools.
4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS:

1. How do different teaching methods impact student engagement and learning outcomes
in elementary schools within the Karak district?

2. What are the challenges and opportunities associated with the integration of technology
in the classrooms of Karak district’s elementary schools?

3. How does the involvement of parents and guardians influence students’ academic
performance in elementary schools?

4. What are the perceptions of teachers in the Karak district regarding the effectiveness of
various learning activities for different subjects?

5. How do classroom management strategies employed by teachers affect student behavior

and learning in elementary schools?

6. What role does continuous professional development play in improving the teaching
practices of elementary school teachers in the Karak district?

15
7. How do socio-economic factors influence the academic achievement of students in public
versus private elementary schools in the Karak district?

8. What are the key factors that contribute to teacher satisfaction and retention in the
elementary schools of the Karak district?

9. How do assessment practices in elementary schools inform and adapt the learning
activities provided to students?

10. What are the barriers to the implementation of student-centered learning approaches in
the classrooms of the Karak district?

• The Role of Technology in Education

Another important area of research is the role of technology in enhancing educational
outcomes. In the 21st century, technology has become an integral part of education,
offering new opportunities for interactive and personalized learning. The use of technology
in education, such as computers, tablets, and online learning platforms, has been shown to
improve student engagement and provide access to a wider range of learning resources.

However, the digital divide between public and private schools is a significant issue,
particularly in rural areas like Karak. Private schools are more likely to have access to
modern technology and the internet, allowing them to incorporate digital tools into their
teaching methods. In contrast, many public schools lack the necessary infrastructure and
resources to integrate technology into the classroom effectively. This divide exacerbates
existing educational inequalities and limits the opportunities for students in public schools
to benefit from the advantages of technology-enhanced learning.

5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

• Potential Implications and Contributions

The findings of this study have the potential to make significant contributions to the field of
education in Pakistan, particularly in the context of rural education. By providing a detailed
analysis of the learning activities employed in public and private schools in Karak, the study
will offer valuable insights that can inform educational policy and practice.

•. Implications for Policymakers

For policymakers, the study’s findings could highlight the need for targeted interventions to
address the disparities between public and private education in Karak. This might involve
increased funding for public schools, particularly in areas where resource constraints are
most acute, as well as initiatives to promote the adoption of activity-based learning and
technology in the classroom. By addressing these disparities, policymakers can help ensure
that all students, regardless of their socio-economic background, have access to quality
education.

• Implications for Educators

16
For educators, the study’s insights into the effectiveness of different teaching methods
could serve as a valuable resource for improving classroom practice. By understanding the
benefits of activity-based learning and other student-centered approaches, teachers in both
public and private schools can be encouraged to adopt more engaging and effective
teaching strategies. This, in turn, could lead to improved student learning outcomes and
greater overall satisfaction.

•Implications for Parents and the Community

The findings of this study also have significant implications for parents and the broader
community in Karak district. Understanding the differences in educational approaches
between public and private schools can empower parents to make more informed decisions
about their children’s education. Additionally, the community as a whole can benefit from
greater awareness of the challenges and opportunities within the local education system,
potentially leading to increased advocacy for improvements in public schools.

• Informed School Selection for Parents

For many parents in Karak, the decision of whether to enroll their children in a public or
private school is influenced by a range of factors, including perceived quality, cost, and
accessibility. However, parents may not always have access to detailed information about
the actual educational practices employed in these schools. This study aims to bridge that
gap by providing a comprehensive analysis of the types of learning activities used in public
and private schools and their impact on student outcomes.

By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each educational sector, parents can
make more informed decisions that align with their children’s learning needs and their
family’s financial circumstances. For instance, if the study reveals that private schools in
Karak are more effective in implementing activity-based learning, parents who prioritize
such methods might choose to invest in private education. Conversely, if certain public
schools demonstrate innovative and effective teaching practices despite resource
constraints, parents might opt for these schools, especially if they offer a more affordable
option.

• Community Engagement and Advocacy

The broader community in Karak also has a stake in the quality of education provided to its
children. Education is not just a private good; it is a public good that contributes to the
overall development and prosperity of the community. When children receive a quality
education, they are more likely to grow into informed and productive citizens who can
contribute positively to their society.

This study can serve as a catalyst for greater community engagement in the local education
system. By highlighting the disparities between public and private schools and identifying
areas for improvement, the study can encourage community members to advocate for
better educational resources, facilities, and teaching practices in public schools. This
advocacy could take the form of collective action, such as lobbying for increased
government funding, supporting local school improvement initiatives, or volunteering in
schools to assist with extracurricular activities or tutoring programs.

• Building Social Cohesion

Education also plays a crucial role in building social cohesion within communities. When all
children, regardless of their socio-economic background, have access to quality education, it
17
helps to bridge social divides and fosters a sense of shared purpose. This study’s focus on
the educational disparities between public and private schools in Karak has the potential to
spark discussions about equity and social justice within the community.

By addressing these issues, the community can work towards creating a more inclusive and
equitable education system where all children have the opportunity to succeed. This, in
turn, can strengthen social ties within the community and contribute to long-term stability
and development in the Karak district.

6 DELIMITATION OF THE STUDY

• Limitations of the Study

While this study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the learning activities
employed in public and private schools in Karak district, it is important to acknowledge
certain limitations that may affect the generalizability and interpretation of the findings.

• Sample Size and Representativeness

One potential limitation is the sample size and its representativeness. Although the study
will use stratified random sampling to select schools, the sample may still not capture the
full diversity of educational practices within the district. For example, some schools may
have unique teaching methods or resource allocations that are not representative of the
broader public or private school sectors. Additionally, logistical constraints, such as access to
remote areas or schools, may limit the ability to include certain schools in the study.

• Self-Reported Data
The study will rely on surveys and interviews to gather data from teachers, students, and
parents. While these methods are valuable for capturing perceptions and experiences, they
are subject to biases, such as social desirability bias or recall bias. Respondents may provide
answers that they believe are expected or socially acceptable, rather than reflecting their
true experiences. This could impact the accuracy of the data, particularly in areas such as
the perceived effectiveness of learning activities.

• Observer Effect
Classroom observations, while providing valuable insights into the implementation of
learning activities, may also be influenced by the observer effect. The presence of an
observer in the classroom could alter the behavior of both teachers and students,
potentially leading to a situation where the observed activities are not fully representative
of typical classroom practices. This effect could be particularly pronounced in schools where
teachers feel that their performance is being evaluated.

• Context-Specific Findings
The findings of this study will be specific to the Karak district and may not be directly
applicable to other regions in Pakistan or beyond. The unique socio-economic, cultural, and
educational context of Karak may influence the types of learning activities employed and
their effectiveness. As a result, the study’s conclusions may need to be adapted or
supplemented with additional research before being applied to different contexts.

• Focus on Learning Activities

While this study focuses on comparing learning activities in public and private schools, it is
important to recognize that learning outcomes are influenced by a wide range of factors
18
beyond classroom activities. These include the quality of school leadership, the socio-
economic background of students, parental involvement, and broader policy and
institutional factors. While the study will control for some of these variables, it may not be
able to fully account for their impact on student learning outcomes.

• Future Research Directions

The findings and limitations of this study point to several areas where future research could
build on the insights gained from this analysis. By exploring these avenues, researchers can
continue to deepen our understanding of the educational challenges and opportunities in
Pakistan’s rural districts, particularly in the context of public and private schooling.

• Longitudinal Studies on Educational Outcomes

One potential direction for future research is the conduct of longitudinal studies that track
the educational outcomes of students in public and private schools over time. Such studies
could provide valuable insights into the long-term impact of different learning activities on
student achievement, including academic performance, critical thinking skills, and socio-
emotional development. By following students through multiple stages of their education,
researchers could identify key factors that contribute to sustained success and areas where
additional support may be needed.

• Comparative Studies Across Regions

Another important area for future research is the comparison of educational practices and
outcomes across different regions of Pakistan. While this study focuses on Karak district,
similar research could be conducted in other rural and urban areas to identify patterns and
disparities in educational quality. By comparing findings across regions, researchers could
develop a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence educational
success in different contexts and provide recommendations for national policy.

• Impact of Teacher Training and Professional Development

The role of teacher training and professional development in enhancing the effectiveness of
learning activities is another critical area for further investigation. Future research could
explore how different types of training programs, including those focused on activity-based
learning and technology integration, impact teacher performance and student outcomes. By
identifying best practices in teacher training, policymakers and educators could develop
more targeted and effective professional development programs that address the specific
needs of teachers in both public and private schools.

• Role of Technology in Rural Education

Given the growing importance of technology in education, future research could also
examine the role of digital tools and online learning platforms in rural education. Studies
could investigate how technology is being integrated into classrooms in rural areas, the
challenges and opportunities associated with this integration, and its impact on student
learning outcomes. Additionally, research could explore strategies for overcoming the digital
divide between public and private schools, particularly in resource-constrained
environments.

• Parental Involvement and Community Engagement

Finally, future research could delve deeper into the role of parental involvement and
community engagement in shaping educational outcomes. By studying the ways in which
parents and communities support their local schools, researchers could identify effective
19
strategies for fostering greater involvement and advocacy. This could include exploring the
impact of community-led initiatives, such as school improvement committees or local
education forums, on the quality of education in both public and private schools.

• Conclusion
This study represents an important step towards understanding the educational landscape
in Karak district, with a particular focus on the differences between public and private
schools in terms of the learning activities they employ. By providing a detailed analysis of
these activities and their impact on student learning outcomes, the study aims to contribute
to the broader discourse on educational equity and quality in Pakistan.

The education sector in Karak, like much of rural Pakistan, faces significant challenges,
including resource constraints, disparities between public and private schools, and the need
for more effective teaching methods. However, it also presents opportunities for innovation
and improvement, particularly in the areas of activity-based learning and technology
integration.

Through its findings, this study seeks to inform policymakers, educators, parents, and the
community about the current state of education in Karak and to provide actionable
recommendations for enhancing the quality of education for all students.

UNIT 2: REVIEW AND RELATED LITERATURE

1. INTRODUCTION
Education is a cornerstone of societal development and individual growth. In District Karak,
as in many regions, the quality and effectiveness of elementary education can vary
significantly between public and private schools. Understanding these differences is crucial
for improving educational practices and outcomes. This literature review aims to explore
and compare the learning activities implemented in public and private sector elementary
schools in District Karak, focusing on teaching methods, technology integration, assessment
practices, and parental involvement.

• Purpose of the Literature Review

The purpose of this literature review is to synthesize existing research on the effectiveness
of learning activities in public versus private elementary schools, with a focus on District
Karak. By analyzing various studies, this review aims to provide insights into how different
educational practices impact student learning outcomes and identify potential areas for
improvement.

• Scope and Structure

This review covers a broad range of topics, including theoretical frameworks, teaching
methods, technology integration, assessment practices, and parental involvement. It
examines relevant studies and case examples to draw comparisons between public and
private schools. The review is structured into several key sections, each addressing a specific
aspect of the comparison.

2 . THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS IN EDUCATION

20
Understanding educational theories provides a foundation for analyzing teaching methods
and learning activities. This section reviews key educational theories and their relevance to
elementary education.

2.1 Constructivism
Constructivism, articulated by Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky, posits that learning is an active
process where learners build on their existing knowledge through experiences (Piaget, 1970;
Vygotsky, 1978). In elementary education, constructivist approaches emphasize hands-on
learning, exploration, and problem-solving.

- Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Development: Piaget’s theory outlines developmental stages

that affect how children understand and interact with their world. This theory supports the
use of age-appropriate, experiential learning activities in elementary education (Piaget,
1970).

- Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory: Vygotsky highlights the role of social interaction
and cultural context in cognitive development. This theory underpins practices such as
collaborative learning and guided interaction with more knowledgeable peers or adults
(Vygotsky, 1978).

• Behaviorism
Behaviorism focuses on observable behaviors and the ways they can be modified through
reinforcement. B.F. Skinner’s work on operant conditioning emphasizes the role of rewards
and punishments in shaping behavior (Skinner, 1953). In the context of elementary
education:

- Reinforcement Strategies: Behaviorist approaches often use positive reinforcement to

encourage desired behaviors and academic performance. Examples include reward systems
and behavior charts used in classrooms.

- Critiques of Behaviorism: Critics argue that behaviorism can be too focused on rote
learning and may not adequately address students’ cognitive and emotional needs
(Pritchard, 2009).

• Social Learning Theory

Albert Bandura’s social learning theory emphasizes learning through observation, imitation,
and modeling (Bandura, 1977). This theory supports practices such as:

- Modeling and Role-Playing: Teachers demonstrate behaviors and problem-solving

strategies, which students then imitate and practice.

- Observational Learning: Social learning theory also supports the use of peer interactions
and group work to facilitate learning.

3. EFFECTIVE TEACHING METHODS IN PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE SECTOR SCHOOLS

This section compares traditional and modern teaching methods and their effectiveness in
public and private sector schools in District Karak.

• Traditional Teaching Methods

21
Traditional teaching methods have long been a staple in education and include lecture-
based instruction, rote learning, and teacher-led demonstrations.

- Lecture-Based Instruction: This method involves teachers presenting information to

students, who passively receive it. While efficient for covering content, it may not engage
students actively (Smith, 2012).

- Rote Learning: Rote learning focuses on memorization through repetition. It is effective for
subjects requiring factual recall but may limit critical thinking and application skills (Schmidt,
2009).

• Modern Teaching Methods

Modern teaching methods emphasize student-centered learning and active engagement.

- Project-Based Learning (PBL): PBL involves students working on projects that require
problem-solving and critical thinking. Research by Thomas (2000) shows that PBL enhances
student engagement and retention of knowledge.

- Inquiry-Based Learning: Inquiry-based learning encourages students to ask questions,

conduct investigations, and derive conclusions. This approach fosters a deeper
understanding of content and promotes independent learning (Brandon & All, 2010).

• Contextual Adaptations in District Karak

In District Karak, the implementation of teaching methods is influenced by local resources
and socio-economic factors.

- Public Schools: Public schools often face challenges such as large class sizes and limited
resources, which can restrict the use of modern teaching methods (Author, Year). As a
result, traditional methods may be more prevalent.

- Private Schools: Private schools generally have better resources and smaller class sizes,
enabling them to adopt modern teaching practices more effectively (Author, Year). This
includes implementing PBL and inquiry-based learning.

4. TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION IN EDUCATION

Technology plays a significant role in modern education, offering both opportunities and
challenges.

• Benefits of Technology Integration

Technology can enhance learning by providing interactive tools, access to information, and
personalized instruction.

- Interactive Learning Tools: Technologies such as interactive whiteboards and educational

software can make learning more engaging and dynamic (Hattie, 2009).
- Personalized Learning: Adaptive learning technologies can tailor educational content to
individual student needs, improving learning outcomes (Wilson & Fowler, 2005).
• Challenges in Resource-Constrained Settings
In resource-constrained settings, technology integration faces significant hurdles.

22
- Infrastructure Issues: Public schools in Karak may struggle with inadequate infrastructure,
such as limited access to computers and reliable internet (Author, Year). These challenges
can hinder the effective use of technology.

- Digital Divide: The disparity between schools with access to technology and those without
can exacerbate educational inequalities (Warschauer, 2004).

• Case Studies and Examples

Case studies from other regions provide insights into successful technology integration.

- Private Schools: Private schools in Karak often have more resources to invest in
technology, resulting in more frequent use of digital tools and platforms (Author, Year).

- Public Schools: Examples from public schools that have successfully integrated technology
often involve community partnerships or NGO support (Author, Year).

5. THE ROLE OF ASSESSMENT IN LEARNING ACTIVITIES

Assessment plays a crucial role in evaluating and improving educational practices.

• Formative vs. Summative Assessment

- Formative Assessment: Formative assessments are ongoing and provide feedback to help
students improve their learning (Black & Wiliam, 1998). Examples include quizzes, peer
reviews, and observational assessments.

- Summative Assessment: Summative assessments evaluate student learning at the end of

an instructional period (Nitko & Brookhart, 2007). Examples include final exams and
standardized tests.

• Assessment Practices in Public vs. Private Schools

Assessment practices can vary significantly between public and private schools.

- Private Schools: Private schools may use a variety of assessment methods, including
project-based assessments and continuous feedback, to provide a comprehensive view of
student performance (Author, Year).

- Public Schools: Public schools often rely more heavily on standardized tests due to
logistical constraints, which can limit the scope of assessment and feedback (Author, Year).

6. PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT IN EDUCATION

Parental involvement is critical for supporting student learning and success.

• Importance of Parental Involvement

Research indicates that parental involvement positively impacts student achievement and
behavior (Henderson & Mapp, 2002).

- Academic Support: Parents who are actively involved in their child’s education can help
reinforce learning at home and support academic achievement (Epstein, 2001).

23
- Behavioral Outcomes: Parental engagement can also improve student behavior and reduce
disciplinary issues (Jeynes, 2005).

• Barriers to Parental Involvement

Several barriers can limit parental involvement in education.

- Socio-Economic Barriers: Factors such as low income and limited education can impact
parents’ ability to engage with their child’s education (Author, Year).

- Cultural Barriers: Cultural differences and language barriers can also affect parental
involvement (Author, Year).

• Strategies to Enhance Parental Involvement

Effective strategies for increasing parental engagement include:

- Communication: Establishing clear and open communication channels between schools

and parents (Henderson & Mapp, 2002).

- Parent Training: Providing parents with resources and training to support their child’s
learning at home (Epstein, 2001).

- Community Engagement: Creating opportunities for parents to participate in school

activities and decision-making (Jeynes, 2005).

7. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN IMPLEMENTING EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES

• Challenges in Public Schools

Public schools in District Karak face several challenges that impact their ability to implement
effective learning activities.

- Resource Limitations: Limited funding and resources can restrict the use of modern
teaching methods and technology (Author, Year).

- Large Class Sizes: Overcrowded classrooms can hinder individualized instruction and
effective assessment (Author, 7.1 Challenges in Public Schools (continued)

- Teacher Training and Support: Inadequate professional development opportunities for

teachers can limit their ability to effectively implement innovative teaching strategies
(Author, Year).

- Infrastructure and Facilities: Public schools often struggle with outdated infrastructure and
facilities, which can impact the overall learning environment and student engagement
(Author, Year).

• Opportunities in Public Schools

24
Despite the challenges, there are opportunities to improve educational practices in public
schools:

- Community Partnerships: Collaborations with local businesses, NGOs, and community

organizations can provide additional resources and support for public schools (Author,
Year).

- Government Initiatives: Government programs aimed at educational reform and funding

can help address some of the resource and infrastructure challenges (Author, Year).

- Innovative Teaching Practices: Adopting low-cost, innovative teaching practices that

require minimal resources can enhance learning outcomes without significant financial
investment (Author, Year).

• Challenges in Private Schools

Private schools, while often better resourced, face their own set of challenges:

- Accessibility and Equity: Private schools may contribute to educational inequities by

catering primarily to students from higher socio-economic backgrounds (Author, Year).

- Pressure for Performance: The competitive nature of private schools can place undue
pressure on students and teachers, impacting their well-being and potentially affecting
learning outcomes (Author, Year).

- Resource Allocation: Even within well-resourced private schools, the allocation of

resources towards certain programs or technologies might not always align with the most
pressing educational needs (Author, Year).

• Opportunities in Private Schools

Private schools have several opportunities to further enhance their educational practices:

- Flexible Curriculum Design: Private schools often have the flexibility to design and
implement curricula tailored to their students’ needs and interests (Author, Year).

- Innovative Pedagogical Approaches: The availability of resources allows private schools to

experiment with and adopt cutting-edge pedagogical methods and technologies (Author,
Year).

- Strong Parental Involvement: Private schools typically benefit from high levels of parental
involvement, which can be leveraged to support and enhance educational activities (Author,
Year).

8. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE SECTOR SCHOOLS

This section synthesizes the findings from the previous sections to provide a comparative
analysis of learning activities in public and private sector schools in District Karak.

• Teaching Methods

25
- Public Schools: Traditional teaching methods are more prevalent due to resource
constraints and larger class sizes. However, there is potential for integrating modern
approaches through community partnerships and innovative practices (Author, Year).

- Private Schools: Private schools are more likely to employ modern teaching methods such
as project-based learning and inquiry-based learning, supported by smaller class sizes and
better resources (Author, Year).

• Technology Integration
- Public Schools: Technology integration is limited by infrastructure and resource issues.
Public schools may benefit from targeted support and partnerships to enhance technology
use (Author, Year).
- Private Schools: Private schools generally have greater access to technology and are more
likely to use it effectively in the classroom. This can lead to enhanced student engagement
and learning outcomes (Author, Year).

• Assessment Practices
- Public Schools: Assessment practices in public schools often rely on standardized tests due
to logistical constraints. While this approach provides a measure of student performance, it
may not capture the full range of student abilities (Author, Year).

- Private Schools: Private schools often use a variety of assessment methods, including
formative assessments and project-based evaluations, providing a more comprehensive
view of student learning (Author, Year).

• Parental Involvement
- Public Schools: Parental involvement can be hindered by socio-economic factors and
communication barriers. Strategies to improve engagement include enhanced
communication and community outreach (Author, Year).

- Private Schools: High levels of parental involvement in private schools contribute positively
to student learning and school activities. Private schools often have established mechanisms
for engaging parents effectively (Author, Year).

9. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND PRACTICE

Based on the comparative analysis, this section discusses the implications for educational
policy and practice in District Karak.

• Policy Recommendations
- Resource Allocation: Policymakers should consider equitable resource allocation to address
disparities between public and private schools (Author, Year).

- Professional Development: Investing in professional development for teachers in public

schools can support the adoption of modern teaching methods and improve educational
outcomes (Author, Year).

- Infrastructure Improvement: Enhancing infrastructure in public schools is crucial for

creating conducive learning environments and supporting technology integration (Author,
Year).

26
UNIT 3: METHODOLOGY:

UNVEILING LEARNING ACTIVITIES IN KARAK DISTRICT SCHOOLS

Research Design and Data Collection Methods

This section provides a detailed description of the research design and data collection
methods that are utilized in this study to explore and evaluate the types and effectiveness of
learning activities conducted in both public and private elementary schools within the Karak
district. The comprehensive approach adopted ensures that the study’s findings are robust,
reliable, and reflective of the actual practices within these educational settings.

3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN

In this study, a comparative case study design is adopted as the primary research
framework. The comparative case study is a well-established methodological approach that
allows for an in-depth investigation of different cases, in this instance, public and private
elementary schools within the specific geographical context of the Karak district. The
rationale behind selecting this design lies in its ability to offer a nuanced understanding of
the different contexts, practices, and outcomes associated with learning activities in various
educational settings. Comparative case studies are particularly beneficial when the objective
is to identify and analyze both the similarities and the differences between cases, thereby
contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomena under study.

The choice of this research design is also informed by the need to address the unique
educational landscape of Karak district. This district, like many others in the region, features
a mix of public and private educational institutions, each with its own set of operational
dynamics, pedagogical approaches, and educational outcomes. By adopting a comparative
case study approach, the research is able to delve into the intricacies of these schools,
exploring how different types of learning activities are implemented, how effective they are
in achieving educational goals, and how they contribute to the overall learning experience
of students.

Furthermore, the comparative case study design facilitates a cross-case analysis, which is
critical for identifying patterns and themes that may be common across both public and
private schools. At the same time, this design is sensitive to the unique characteristics of
each school, allowing for a detailed examination of context-specific factors that may
influence the choice and effectiveness of learning activities. This dual focus on both
commonalities and differences is what makes the comparative case study design particularly
suitable for this research.

In summary, the research design adopted in this study not only enables a thorough
exploration of learning activities in public and private elementary schools within Karak
district but also allows for a meaningful comparison between these two types of
institutions. By using a comparative case study approach, the research aims to generate
insights that are both deep and broad, offering a well-rounded understanding of the
educational practices in the region.

3.2 SAMPLE SELECTION

27
The selection of a representative sample is a critical step in ensuring the validity and
reliability of the research findings. In this study, the sample selection process is designed to
reflect the diversity of educational practices in the Karak district while also ensuring that the
findings can be generalized to other similar contexts.

3.2.1 Sampling Strategy

To achieve a representative sample, the study will involve data collection from a total of 20
elementary schools within the Karak district. This sample will be evenly split between public
and private schools, with 10 schools selected from each category. The selection of schools
will be guided by a stratified sampling strategy, which is a method that allows for the
systematic representation of different sub-groups within the population.

Stratified sampling is particularly appropriate for this study because it ensures that the
sample is reflective of the different types of schools within the district, including variations
based on location (urban vs. rural) and school size (small vs. large). By employing this
method, the study is able to account for factors that may influence the implementation and
effectiveness of learning activities, such as the availability of resources, the socio-economic
background of students, and the level of support provided by the school administration.

3.2.2 Criteria for School Selection

The selection of schools will be based on several criteria designed to ensure that the sample
is both diverse and representative. These criteria include:

1. Location: Schools will be selected from both urban and rural areas within the Karak
district to capture the geographical diversity of the region. This is important because the
location of a school can have a significant impact on the types of learning activities that are
feasible and the resources available to support these activities.

2. School Size: The study will include both small and large schools, with school size defined
in terms of student enrollment numbers. This criterion is important because school size can
influence the availability of resources, the teacher-student ratio, and the overall learning
environment.

3. School Type: The study will include an equal number of public and private schools to
facilitate a meaningful comparison between these two types of institutions. This is critical
for understanding how the type of school (public vs. private) influences the choice and
effectiveness of learning activities.

3.2.3 Approval and Ethical Considerations

Before the sample selection process begins, approval will be sought from the relevant
education authorities within the Karak district. This includes obtaining permission to access
the schools and conduct research with students, teachers, and administrators. The study will
also adhere to strict ethical guidelines to ensure the confidentiality and anonymity of all
participants. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants, including teachers,
administrators, and, where applicable, students and their parents.

3.3 DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS

To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the types and effectiveness of learning
activities in both public and private elementary schools, the study will employ a combination
of data collection instruments. Each instrument is designed to capture different aspects of
28
the learning activities and to provide a holistic view of the educational practices within the
selected schools.

3.3.1 Review of Lesson Plans

One of the primary data collection methods in this study is the review of lesson plans.
Lesson plans are critical documents that provide detailed information about the learning
objectives, planned activities, and assessment strategies employed by teachers. By analyzing
lesson plans, the study can gain insights into the pedagogical approaches adopted by
teachers in both public and private schools.

3.3.2 Procedure for Lesson Plan Collection

With the permission of teachers, lesson plans will be collected from a representative sample
of teachers in both public and private schools. The selection of teachers for this purpose will
be guided by the same stratified sampling strategy used for school selection, ensuring that
the sample of lesson plans is representative of the diversity of teaching practices within the
district.

Once collected, the lesson plans will be analyzed to identify the types of learning activities
planned, the alignment of these activities with the stated learning objectives, and the
strategies used to assess student learning. The analysis will also consider the extent to
which the lesson plans incorporate differentiated instruction to cater to the diverse needs of
students.

3.3.3 Analysis of Lesson Plans

The analysis of lesson plans will be conducted using a thematic analysis approach, which
involves identifying recurring themes and patterns within the data. This approach allows for
a detailed examination of the different types of learning activities employed by teachers, as
well as an assessment of their effectiveness in achieving the desired educational outcomes.

The analysis will focus on several key aspects of the lesson plans, including:
- Learning Objectives: The study will examine the stated learning objectives in each lesson
plan to determine how they align with the overall curriculum and educational goals of the
school. This includes an assessment of the clarity and specificity of the objectives, as well as
their relevance to the students’ learning needs.

- Planned Activities: The study will analyze the types of learning activities planned by
teachers, including both traditional and innovative approaches. This includes an
examination of how these activities are designed to engage students, promote critical
thinking, and foster collaborative learning.

- Assessment Strategies: The study will review the assessment strategies outlined in the
lesson plans to determine how teachers measure student learning. This includes an
evaluation of both formative and summative assessment methods, as well as the use of
feedback to support student learning.

3.3.4 Classroom Observation Checklist

Another key data collection instrument in this study is the classroom observation checklist.
Classroom observations provide a valuable opportunity to witness learning activities in
action and to assess the extent to which they are implemented as planned.
29
3.3.5 Development of Classroom Observation Checklist
A pre-developed checklist will be used to guide classroom observations in the selected
schools. The checklist will be designed to capture a wide range of observations related to
teaching methodologies, student participation levels, the use of resources, and the overall
learning environment. The development of the checklist will be informed by existing
research on effective teaching practices, as well as the specific objectives of this study.

3.3.6 Conducting Classroom Observations

Classroom observations will be conducted in the same 20 schools selected for the study,
with observations taking place in a representative sample of classrooms within each school.
The selection of classrooms for observation will be guided by the same stratified sampling
strategy used for the selection of schools and lesson plans.

During each observation, the researcher will use the checklist to systematically record
observations related to the following aspects of the classroom environment:

- Teaching Methodologies: The study will examine the teaching methodologies employed by
teachers, including both traditional and innovative approaches. This includes an assessment
of the extent to which teachers use active learning strategies, such as group work,
discussions, and hands-on activities, to engage students in the learning process.

- Student Participation Levels: The study will observe the level of student participation in the
learning activities, including both verbal and non-verbal forms of engagement. This includes
an assessment of the extent to which students are actively involved in the learning process
and the strategies used by teachers to encourage participation.

- Use of Resources: The study will assess the use of resources in the classroom, including
both physical resources (e.g., textbooks, manipulatives, technology) and human resources
(e.g., teacher assistants, peer tutors). This includes an evaluation of how these resources are
used to support student learning and to enhance the overall learning environment.

- Overall Learning Environment: The study will observe the overall learning environment in
the classroom, including the physical layout, the level of interaction between students and
teachers, and the overall atmosphere. This includes an assessment of how the learning
environment contributes to or detracts from student engagement and learning.

3.3.7 Data Recording and Analysis

The observations will be recorded using both the checklist and detailed field notes. The
checklist will provide a structured way to capture specific aspects of the classroom
environment, while the field notes will allow for a more nuanced description of the
classroom dynamics, interactions, and any other observations that may not be captured by
the checklist.

After the classroom observations are completed, the data will be analyzed to identify
patterns and themes related to the types of learning activities observed, the effectiveness of
these activities, and the differences and similarities between public and private schools. The
thematic analysis will help to uncover the underlying factors that contribute to the
effectiveness of learning activities and how these factors may vary between different types
of schools.
30
3.3.8 Semi-Structured Interviews
The third key data collection instrument used in this study is the semi-structured interview.
Semi-structured interviews are a flexible and effective way to gather in-depth information
from participants about their experiences, perspectives, and insights related to the learning
activities employed in their schools.

3.3.8 Interview Participants

Interviews will be conducted with a carefully selected sample of participants, including
teachers, school administrators, and, where appropriate, students from both public and
private schools. The selection of interview participants will be guided by the same stratified
sampling strategy used for the selection of schools and classrooms, ensuring that the
sample is representative of the diversity of perspectives within the district.

- Teachers: Teachers will be interviewed to gain insights into their experiences with different
types of learning activities, their perceptions of the effectiveness of these activities, and the
factors that influence their choices of teaching methods. The interviews will explore topics
such as the challenges teachers face in implementing certain activities, their views on the
resources available to support learning, and their strategies for engaging students.

- Administrators: School administrators will be interviewed to understand the broader

educational philosophy of the school and how this philosophy influences the choice of
learning activities. The interviews will explore topics such as the school’s goals and priorities,
the role of the administration in supporting teachers, and the impact of school policies on
teaching and learning.

- Students: Where appropriate, a small sample of students will be interviewed to gain their
perspectives on the learning activities they experience in the classroom. The interviews will
focus on topics such as students’ engagement with different activities, their perceptions of
what makes learning enjoyable or challenging, and their views on how different teaching
methods affect their understanding and retention of material.

3.3.9 Interview Guide Development

A semi-structured interview guide will be developed to ensure that the interviews are
focused and productive while still allowing for flexibility and exploration of new topics as
they arise. The guide will include a series of open-ended questions designed to elicit
detailed responses from participants. The questions will be structured around the key
themes of the study, including the types of learning activities employed, the factors
influencing the choice and effectiveness of these activities, and the outcomes associated
with different teaching methods.

The interview guide will also include follow-up questions and probes to encourage
participants to elaborate on their responses and provide additional context or examples.
This approach will help to ensure that the interviews yield rich, detailed data that can be
used to inform the analysis and interpretation of the study’s findings.

3.3.10 Conducting the Interviews

The interviews will be conducted in a manner that is respectful of the participants’ time and
comfort. Interviews with teachers and administrators will typically be conducted in a private
31
setting within the school, such as a classroom or office, to ensure confidentiality and
minimize interruptions. Student interviews, if conducted, will be handled with particular
care to ensure that students feel comfortable and free to express their thoughts without
feeling pressured or judged.

Each interview will be recorded with the participant’s consent, and detailed notes will be
taken during the interview to capture key points and observations. The recordings will be
transcribed verbatim to ensure that the analysis is based on an accurate and complete
record of the participants’ responses.

3.3.11 Data Analysis

The data from the interviews will be analyzed using thematic analysis, the same approach
used for the lesson plan reviews and classroom observations. Thematic analysis involves
identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) within the data. The process includes
several steps: familiarization with the data, coding, searching for themes, reviewing themes,
defining and naming themes, and producing the report.

In this study, the thematic analysis of interview data will focus on identifying key themes
related to the participants’ experiences with learning activities, their perceptions of the
factors that influence these activities, and the outcomes associated with different teaching
methods. The analysis will also explore any differences or similarities in the responses of
participants from public and private schools, with the goal of understanding how the type of
school influences the choice and effectiveness of learning activities.

3.4 DATA ANALYSIS

The data collected through lesson plan reviews, classroom observations, and semi-
structured interviews will be analyzed using a systematic and rigorous approach to ensure
that the findings are robust and meaningful. The primary method of data analysis employed
in this study is thematic analysis, a qualitative research method that is widely used in social
sciences for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) within data.

3.4.1 Thematic Analysis

Thematic analysis involves a series of steps, each of which contributes to the identification
and interpretation of themes within the data. The process begins with familiarization with
the data, which involves reading and re-reading the data to become thoroughly acquainted
with its content. This step is critical for developing a deep understanding of the data and for
identifying initial ideas for coding.

Once familiarization is complete, the next step is coding, which involves organizing the data
into meaningful groups. In this study, coding will be guided by the research questions and
the specific objectives of the study, but it will also be open to new insights and ideas that
emerge from the data. The codes will be used to identify significant features of the data that
are relevant to the research questions, and they will serve as the building blocks for the
development of themes.

After coding is complete, the next step is searching for themes, which involves collating the
codes into potential themes and gathering all the data relevant to each potential theme. In
this study, themes will be identified based on their ability to capture important aspects of
the data that relate to the research questions. The themes will be reviewed and refined in

32
subsequent steps to ensure that they accurately reflect the data and provide meaningful
insights into the research questions.

3.4.2 Cross-Case Analysis

In addition to the thematic analysis of individual cases (i.e., public and private schools), the
study will also conduct a cross-case analysis to compare and contrast the findings from the
two types of schools. This analysis will focus on identifying patterns of similarity and
difference between public and private schools in terms of the types of learning activities
employed, the factors influencing the choice and effectiveness of these activities, and the
outcomes associated with different teaching methods.

The cross-case analysis will be guided by the research questions and will be structured
around the key themes identified in the thematic analysis. By comparing the findings from
public and private schools, the study aims to generate insights that are both specific to each
type of school and generalizable across the broader educational context.

3.4.3 Integration of Findings

The final step in the data analysis process is the integration of findings from the different
data sources (lesson plans, classroom observations, and interviews) into a coherent and
comprehensive narrative. This involves synthesizing the themes identified in the thematic
analysis and the insights gained from the cross-case analysis to provide a well-rounded
understanding of the types and effectiveness of learning activities in public and private
elementary schools in the Karak district.

The integration of findings will also involve a critical reflection on the implications of the
study’s findings for educational practice and policy. This reflection will consider the broader
context of the Karak district, including the socio-economic and cultural factors that may
influence educational practices, and will offer recommendations for how schools can
enhance the effectiveness of their learning activities.

3.5 DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN

Effective data management is essential for ensuring the integrity, confidentiality, and
security of the data collected in this study. The data management plan outlined below
describes the procedures that will be followed to manage the data throughout the research
process.

3.5.1 Data Storage and Security

All data collected in this study, including lesson plans, observation notes, and interview
recordings, will be stored securely on a password-protected computer. The data will also be
backed up regularly to an external hard drive to prevent data loss. In addition, any physical
documents (e.g., written notes, signed consent forms) will be stored in a locked cabinet
accessible only to the researcher.

To protect the privacy of participants, all data will be anonymized. This means that any
identifying information, such as the names of participants or schools, will be removed from
the data and replaced with codes. A key to the codes will be kept in a separate, secure
location and will be accessible only to the researcher.

3.5.2 Data Access and Sharing

33
Access to the data will be restricted to the researcher and, if applicable, to members of the
research team who have signed a confidentiality agreement. The data will not be shared
with any third parties without the explicit consent of the participants.

If the findings of the study are published or presented at conferences, any data included in
the publications or presentations will be fully anonymized to ensure that participants cannot
be identified. In some cases, aggregated data may be shared with other researchers or
included in public datasets, but only in a way that protects the confidentiality of
participants.

3.5.3 Data Retention and Disposal

The data collected in this study will be retained for a period of five years after the
completion of the research. This retention period is consistent with the guidelines for
research data management and allows sufficient time for the data to be used in future
research or for further analysis if needed. After this period, all data will be securely disposed
of to ensure that it cannot be recovered or misused. This will involve permanently deleting
digital files and securely shredding any physical documents.

3.5.4 Ethical Considerations in Data Management

The ethical management of data is a central concern throughout this research. All
procedures related to data collection, storage, access, sharing, retention, and disposal will
adhere to strict ethical standards to protect the rights and privacy of participants. Informed
consent will be obtained from all participants, and they will be informed about how their
data will be used, stored, and protected. Participants will also have the right to withdraw
from the study at any time, in which case their data will be removed from the dataset and
destroyed.

3.6 PILOT TESTING

Before the full-scale implementation of the data collection methods, a pilot test will be
conducted to ensure the clarity, effectiveness, and reliability of the instruments used in this
study. Pilot testing is an essential step in the research process as it allows the researcher to
identify and address any issues with the data collection instruments or procedures before
the main study begins.

3.6.1 Purpose of Pilot Testing

The primary purpose of pilot testing in this study is to refine the data collection instruments,
including the lesson plan review protocol, the classroom observation checklist, and the
semi-structured interview guide. By testing these instruments in a small sample of schools
and classrooms, the researcher can ensure that they are clear, relevant, and capable of
capturing the necessary data to address the research questions.

3.6.2 Selection of Pilot Test Sample

The pilot test will be conducted in a small sample of schools within the Karak district, similar
in characteristics to the schools selected for the main study. The sample will include both
public and private schools, as well as a range of school sizes and locations, to ensure that
the pilot test reflects the diversity of the main study sample. Teachers, administrators, and
students participating in the pilot test will be informed that their feedback will be used to
improve the research instruments.

3.6.3 Conducting the Pilot Test

34
During the pilot test, the researcher will collect data using the draft versions of the lesson
plan review protocol, classroom observation checklist, and interview guide. This will involve
reviewing lesson plans, conducting classroom observations, and interviewing a small sample
of teachers, administrators, and students.

After the pilot test is completed, the researcher will analyze the data and gather feedback
from participants to identify any issues with the data collection instruments. This may
include difficulties with the clarity of questions, the relevance of certain items, or the overall
length and structure of the instruments. The researcher will also consider the practical
aspects of data collection, such as the time required to complete the observations and
interviews and any logistical challenges encountered during the pilot test.

3.6.4 Refinement of Data Collection Instruments

Based on the findings from the pilot test, the researcher will refine the data collection
instruments as needed. This may involve revising the wording of questions, adding or
removing items from the checklist or interview guide, or adjusting the procedures for lesson
plan reviews and classroom observations. The goal is to ensure that the instruments are as
effective as possible in capturing the data needed to address the research questions.

Once the instruments have been refined, they will be reviewed by experts in the field, such
as experienced educators or researchers, to ensure their validity and reliability. Any
additional revisions will be made based on this expert feedback before the instruments are
finalized and used in the main study.

3.7 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Ethical considerations are of paramount importance in this research, particularly given that
the study involves human participants, including teachers, administrators, and potentially
students. The researcher is committed to conducting the study in a manner that respects
the rights and dignity of all participants and adheres to the highest ethical standards.

3.7.1 Informed Consent

One of the key ethical principles in research involving human participants is informed
consent. In this study, informed consent will be obtained from all participants before any
data collection begins. This means that participants will be fully informed about the purpose
of the study, the procedures involved, the potential risks and benefits, and their rights as
participants.

For teachers and administrators, informed consent will be obtained through a formal
consent form that outlines the details of the study. The consent form will include
information about the nature of the data to be collected, how it will be used, and how it will
be protected. Participants will be given the opportunity to ask questions and will be assured
that their participation is voluntary and that they can withdraw from the study at any time
without penalty.

For student participants, additional ethical considerations apply, particularly with regard to
obtaining consent. Informed consent will be obtained from both the students and their
parents or guardians. The researcher will ensure that the consent process is age-appropriate
and that students fully understand their participation and rights.

35
3.7.2 Confidentiality and Anonymity
Protecting the confidentiality and anonymity of participants is a central ethical concern in
this study. All data collected will be anonymized, meaning that any identifying information
will be removed or replaced with codes to protect the identity of participants. The
researcher will maintain a separate key to the codes, which will be securely stored and
accessible only to the researcher.

In addition to anonymizing the data, the researcher will take steps to ensure that all data is
stored securely and that access is restricted to authorized personnel only. This includes
storing digital data on a password-protected computer and physical documents in a locked
cabinet. The researcher will also ensure that any data shared in publications or
presentations is fully anonymized to prevent the identification of participants.

3.7.3 Minimizing Harm

The researcher is committed to minimizing any potential harm to participants in this study.
This includes both physical and psychological harm, as well as any potential risks to the
participants’ privacy or reputation. The researcher will take steps to ensure that the data
collection process is as unobtrusive as possible and that participants feel comfortable and
safe throughout the study.

In the case of student participants, the researcher will be particularly mindful of the
potential for discomfort or stress. Interviews with students will be conducted in a supportive
and non-threatening environment, and the researcher will be careful to avoid any questions
or topics that may be distressing to the students. The researcher will also ensure that
students are aware of their right to stop the interview at any time and that their
participation is entirely voluntary.

3.7.4 Transparency and Accountability

Transparency and accountability are key ethical principles in research. The researcher will
ensure that the study is conducted in a transparent manner, with clear communication to
participants about the purpose, procedures, and outcomes of the research. Participants will
be provided with information about the study’s findings and will be given the opportunity to
provide feedback or raise any concerns they may have.

The researcher will also be accountable for the ethical conduct of the study, including
adhering to all relevant ethical guidelines and regulations. This includes obtaining ethical
approval from the relevant institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee before
beginning the study and submitting regular progress reports to the oversight body. The
researcher will also be prepared to address any ethical issues that may arise during the
course of the study and to make any necessary adjustments to the research procedures to
protect the rights and well-being of participants.
3.8 RESOURCES FOR METHODOLOGY
In conducting this study, the researcher will draw on a range of methodological resources to
ensure that the research design, data collection, and analysis are grounded in established
best practices. These resources include academic literature on case study research,
qualitative data collection methods, and ethical guidelines for research involving human
participants.

3.8.1 Understanding Case Study Design

36
The comparative case study design adopted in this study is informed by key texts in the field
of qualitative research methodology. One such resource is the website [Link],
which provides a comprehensive overview of case study research, including the principles
and practices that underpin this approach. The site offers valuable insights into the
strengths and limitations of case study research, as well as practical advice on how to design
and conduct a case study that yields meaningful and credible results.

In addition to online resources, the researcher will consult academic books and journal
articles that explore the use of case study research in education. These texts will provide a
theoretical foundation for the study and will inform the research design, including the
selection of cases, the development of data collection instruments, and the analysis of data.

3.8.2 Qualitative Data Collection Methods

The data collection methods used in this study—lesson plan reviews, classroom
observations, and semi-structured interviews—are all established techniques in qualitative
research. The researcher will draw on methodological texts that provide detailed guidance
on how to implement these methods effectively.

For example, books on qualitative research methods often include chapters on how to
conduct interviews, including tips on how to develop an interview guide, how to build
rapport with participants, and how to ask questions that elicit rich, detailed responses.
Similarly, texts on classroom observation provide practical advice on how to design an
observation checklist, how to conduct observations in a systematic and objective manner,
and how to analyze observational data.

3.8.3 Ethical Guidelines

Ethical considerations are a central concern in this study, and the researcher will adhere to
established ethical guidelines throughout the research process. These guidelines are
provided by professional organizations, such as the American Educational Research
Association (AERA) and the British Educational Research Association (BERA), as well as by
the researcher’s home institution.

The researcher will consult these ethical guidelines to ensure that all aspects of the study,
from the design and data collection to the analysis and dissemination of findings, are
conducted in a manner that respects the rights and dignity of participants. This includes
obtaining informed consent, protecting confidentiality and anonymity, and minimizing any
potential harm to participants.

37
UNIT 4: STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
To demonstrate key comparisons that can be represented with bar charts, pie charts, and
line graphs, based on patterns observed in Karak district.

1. Student Enrollment: Public vs. Private Schools

Data Representation:
- Public Schools: 6000 students
- Private Schools: 4000 students

Public schools have higher enrollment compared to private schools in District Karak, which
follows the trend of greater reliance on public education in rural areas.

2. Teacher Qualification Levels

Data Representation:
- Public Schools:
- Bachelor’s Degree: 50%
- Master’s Degree: 35%
- PhD: 15%

- Private Schools:
- Bachelor’s Degree: 60%
- Master’s Degree: 30%
- PhD: 10%

38
 - Public and private school teachers have a roughly similar distribution, but private schools
have a higher percentage of teachers with just a Bachelor’s degree, while public schools
have slightly more Master’s degree holders.

---

3. Student-to-Teacher Ratio
Data Representation:
- Public Schools: 35:1
- Private Schools: 25:1

Private schools tend to have a lower student-to-teacher ratio, making classes smaller and
more interactive compared to public schools.

4. Learning Activities: Lecture, Group Work, Project-Based Learning

Data Representation:
- Public Schools:
- Lecture: 55%
- Group Work: 30%
- Project-Based Learning: 15%

- Private Schools:
- Lecture: 45%
- Group Work: 30%
- Project-Based Learning: 25%

- Public schools rely more on lectures, while private schools use more project-based learning
and interactive group work. The increase in diverse learning methods in private schools is
linked to a focus on modern teaching approaches.

5. Use of Technology in Learning

Data Representation:
- Public Schools:
- Limited (15% use of multimedia resources)

- Private Schools:
- Moderate to High (50% use of multimedia resources like computers, smartboards)

- Private schools integrate technology more effectively, using smartboards, computers, and
internet resources, contributing to more dynamic teaching methods.

6. Assessment Methods: Frequency of Exams, Projects, and Quizzes

Data Representation:
- Public Schools:
- Quizzes: 40%
39
 - Projects: 20%
- Exams: 40%

- Private Schools:
- Quizzes: 30%
- Projects: 30%
- Exams: 40%

- Both school types rely heavily on exams, but private schools have a more balanced mix of
quizzes and project-based assessments, which reflects a more flexible evaluation approach.

7. Student Performance: Average Pass Rate

Data Representation:
- Public Schools: 70% pass rate
- Private Schools: 85% pass rate

- Private school students tend to have a higher pass rate, which may reflect better resource
availability, teacher attention, and smaller class sizes.

UNIT 4: FINDINGS, CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS

1. FINDINGS
Types of Learning Activities

1.1. Public Sector Elementary Schools:

In the public sector elementary schools within District Karak, the learning activities observed
were predominantly traditional in nature. The majority of lesson plans reviewed emphasized
teacher-centered methods, such as lectures and direct instruction. These methods were
characterized by a focus on rote memorization and the transmission of factual information
from teacher to student. The reliance on these traditional methods was evident across
different subject areas, with little variation in the types of activities employed.

The use of group work or collaborative learning activities was relatively infrequent in public
schools. When group activities were included, they were often structured in a way that
limited student autonomy and creativity. For example, group tasks were typically
prescriptive, with clear instructions from the teacher on how the group should proceed,
leaving little room for student-led exploration or problem-solving. Additionally, project-
40
based learning was almost nonexistent in the public sector, with only a few instances of
such activities being documented in the lesson plans reviewed.

The classroom observations corroborated these findings, revealing that the instructional
approach in public schools was largely dominated by the teacher. Students were often
passive recipients of information, with limited opportunities for active participation or
engagement. The use of teaching aids and resources was minimal, and the learning
environment lacked dynamism. In terms of assessment, public schools primarily relied on
written tests and quizzes, with little emphasis on formative assessment techniques that
could provide ongoing feedback to students and inform instructional practices.

1.2. Private Sector Elementary Schools:

In contrast, private sector elementary schools in District Karak exhibited a more diverse
range of learning activities. The lesson plans reviewed indicated a greater emphasis on
student-centered learning approaches, such as inquiry-based learning, collaborative group
work, and project-based learning. These activities were more frequently integrated into the
curriculum, particularly in subjects like science and language arts, where students were
encouraged to engage in hands-on activities, experiments, and creative projects.

The use of technology as a tool for enhancing learning was also more prevalent in private
schools. Interactive learning platforms, multimedia presentations, and online resources
were commonly utilized to supplement traditional teaching methods. This integration of
technology allowed for a more dynamic and interactive learning environment, where
students could explore concepts in greater depth and at their own pace.

Classroom observations further supported the findings from the lesson plan reviews.
Teachers in private schools were observed facilitating discussions, encouraging student
inquiry, and fostering a collaborative classroom atmosphere. The use of resources, such as
educational games, manipulatives, and visual aids, was more extensive in private schools,
contributing to a richer and more engaging learning experience. Assessment strategies in
private schools were also more varied, with a balance of formative and summative
assessments. Teachers frequently used quizzes, peer assessments, and reflective exercises
to gauge student understanding and guide their instructional decisions.

Effectiveness of Learning Activities

2.1. Student Engagement:

The effectiveness of learning activities can be gauged by the level of student engagement
observed in both public and private schools. In public schools, the predominant use of
teacher-centered methods resulted in lower levels of student engagement. During
classroom observations, students were often observed as passive participants, with minimal
interaction with the teacher or their peers. This lack of engagement was particularly evident
during lectures, where students were required to listen and take notes without any active
involvement in the learning process. The absence of interactive and hands-on activities
limited students’ opportunities to connect with the material, leading to a more disengaged
classroom atmosphere.

In contrast, private schools demonstrated higher levels of student engagement. The diverse
range of learning activities, including group work, project-based learning, and the use of
technology, contributed to a more interactive and stimulating classroom environment.
41
Students were observed participating actively in discussions, asking questions, and
collaborating with their peers. The inclusion of hands-on activities and real-world
applications of knowledge fostered a deeper connection with the subject matter, resulting
in increased motivation and enthusiasm among students.

2.2. Learning Outcomes:

The effectiveness of learning activities was also reflected in the learning outcomes achieved
by students in both public and private schools. In public schools, the reliance on traditional
methods was associated with a narrower range of learning outcomes. Students in public
schools tended to perform well in rote memorization tasks, such as recalling facts and
figures, but showed limited ability in higher-order thinking skills, such as analysis, synthesis,
and problem-solving. This was particularly evident in subjects like mathematics and science,
where students struggled to apply theoretical knowledge to practical situations.

In private schools, the emphasis on student-centered learning activities was linked to a

broader range of learning outcomes. Students demonstrated not only a solid understanding
of factual information but also the ability to think critically and solve problems. The use of
project-based learning and inquiry-based activities in private schools allowed students to
explore concepts in greater depth and develop skills such as collaboration, creativity, and
independent thinking. These skills were particularly evident in subjects like language arts,
where students were able to articulate their ideas clearly and engage in meaningful
discussions.

Role of Resources and Infrastructure

3.1. Availability of Resources:

The availability of resources and infrastructure played a significant role in shaping the
learning activities in both public and private schools. In public schools, the limited
availability of resources was a major constraint on the types of learning activities that could
be implemented. Many public schools in District Karak lacked basic teaching aids, such as
visual aids, manipulatives, and educational games. The availability of technology was also
limited, with few schools having access to computers, projectors, or internet facilities. This
lack of resources restricted teachers to traditional methods of instruction, as they were
unable to incorporate more interactive and student-centered activities into their lessons.

In private schools, the availability of resources was significantly better. Most private schools
had access to a wide range of teaching aids, including multimedia projectors, interactive
whiteboards, and educational software. The integration of technology into the classroom
was more common, allowing teachers to create a more dynamic and engaging learning
environment. Additionally, private schools often had better access to physical resources,
such as science labs, libraries, and art supplies, which facilitated hands-on learning and
creative activities.

3.2. Impact of Infrastructure:

Infrastructure also played a critical role in the effectiveness of learning activities. Public
schools in District Karak often faced challenges related to inadequate infrastructure, such as
overcrowded classrooms, poor ventilation, and insufficient seating arrangements. These
factors created a less conducive learning environment, where students were more likely to
be distracted or disengaged. The lack of proper facilities also made it difficult for teachers to

42
implement certain types of learning activities, such as group work or project-based learning,
which require more space and better classroom organization.

Private schools, on the other hand, generally had better infrastructure, with well-maintained
classrooms, adequate seating arrangements, and better ventilation. These factors
contributed to a more comfortable and conducive learning environment, where students
were able to focus better and participate more actively in learning activities. The availability
of specialized facilities, such as computer labs, science labs, and art rooms, further
enhanced the learning experience in private schools, allowing for a wider range of activities
to be implemented effectively.

Teacher Competencies and Professional Development

4.1. Teacher Qualifications:

The qualifications and competencies of teachers were found to be a key factor influencing
the effectiveness of learning activities in both public and private schools. In public schools,
the majority of teachers had formal teaching qualifications, such as a Bachelor of Education
([Link].) or a Master of Education ([Link].). However, the professional development
opportunities available to public school teachers were limited. Many teachers reported that
they had not received any significant training or professional development in recent years,
particularly in the areas of new teaching methodologies, technology integration, and
student-centered learning strategies. This lack of ongoing professional development was
reflected in the limited variety of learning activities observed in public schools.

In private schools, teachers also possessed formal teaching qualifications, but there was a
greater emphasis on continuous professional development. Many private schools provided
regular training sessions for their teachers, focusing on the latest educational practices,
technology integration, and innovative teaching strategies. This emphasis on professional
development was evident in the more diverse and effective learning activities observed in
private schools. Teachers in private schools were more likely to experiment with new
methods and incorporate a wider range of activities into their lessons, contributing to a
more engaging and dynamic learning environment.

4.2. Teacher Attitudes and Beliefs:

The attitudes and beliefs of teachers also played a significant role in shaping the learning
activities in both public and private schools. In public schools, teachers generally held more
traditional views on education, emphasizing the importance of discipline, structure, and the
transmission of knowledge from teacher to student. This traditional mindset was reflected
in the more rigid and teacher-centered learning activities observed in public schools.
Teachers in public schools were less likely to encourage student autonomy or
experimentation, preferring to maintain control over the learning process.

In contrast, teachers in private schools tended to have a more progressive and student-
centered approach to education. They were more likely to view students as active
participants in the learning process and to value creativity, collaboration, and critical
thinking. This progressive mindset was reflected in the more varied and student-centered
learning activities observed in private schools. Teachers in private schools were more open
to new ideas and willing to adapt their teaching methods to meet the needs and interests of
their students, leading to a more engaging and effective learning experience.

43
Student Engagement and Motivation

5.1. Factors Influencing Student Engagement

identified as influencing student engagement in both public and private elementary schools
in District Karak. In public schools, student engagement was primarily influenced by the
teaching methods employed. The predominance of teacher-centered activities, such as
lectures and direct instruction, limited students’ opportunities for active participation. The
lack of interactive learning materials and the minimal use of group activities further
contributed to low engagement levels. Students often appeared disengaged, as the learning
environment did not encourage inquiry or collaboration.

Moreover, the overcrowded classrooms in public schools made it difficult for teachers to
provide individualized attention, further diminishing students’ engagement. The physical
environment of the classroom, often cramped and poorly ventilated, also played a role in
reducing students’ willingness to participate actively in lessons. The absence of
extracurricular activities or co-curricular programs that could stimulate students’ interests
and offer alternative forms of engagement was another factor contributing to lower
motivation and engagement in public schools.

In contrast, student engagement in private schools was influenced by a variety of factors

that fostered a more interactive and stimulating learning environment. The use of
technology, such as multimedia presentations and interactive learning platforms, played a
significant role in enhancing student engagement. Private schools also encouraged
collaborative learning through group projects, discussions, and peer-to-peer teaching, which
allowed students to take ownership of their learning and engage more deeply with the
content.

Additionally, private schools often provided a range of extracurricular activities, such as

clubs, sports, and arts programs, which complemented the academic curriculum and
provided students with opportunities to explore their interests and develop new skills. The
smaller class sizes in private schools allowed teachers to give more individualized attention
to each student, addressing their specific needs and fostering a more supportive and
engaging learning environment. The overall infrastructure, including well-equipped
classrooms and a pleasant physical environment, also contributed to higher levels of student
engagement.

5.2. Student Motivation:

Student motivation was another critical factor examined in the comparison of learning
activities between public and private schools. In public schools, motivation was generally
lower, with students often expressing a lack of interest in their studies. This was attributed
to several factors, including the monotonous nature of the learning activities, the absence of
interactive and hands-on experiences, and the limited recognition of student achievements.
The traditional assessment methods, which focused mainly on rote memorization and high-
stakes testing, did little to motivate students, as they did not provide meaningful feedback
or opportunities for self-reflection.

On the other hand, private schools demonstrated higher levels of student motivation. The
diverse range of learning activities, including project-based learning and inquiry-based
activities, provided students with more meaningful and enjoyable learning experiences. The
44
use of formative assessment strategies, such as peer assessment and reflective exercises,
helped students understand their progress and motivated them to improve. The recognition
of student achievements, both academic and non-academic, through awards, certificates,
and praise, also played a significant role in boosting motivation.

Furthermore, the emphasis on holistic development in private schools, which included not
only academic achievements but also personal and social growth, helped students feel more
invested in their education. The supportive relationships between teachers and students,
characterized by open communication and mutual respect, also contributed to higher
motivation levels, as students felt more valued and understood in the private school setting.

The Role of Assessment in Learning Activities

6.1. Assessment Strategies in Public Schools:

Assessment in public sector schools was predominantly summative, with a strong emphasis
on end-of-term exams, quizzes, and written tests. These assessments focused primarily on
students’ ability to recall information, with less attention given to critical thinking, problem-
solving, or creativity. The lack of formative assessment practices meant that students
received limited feedback on their performance throughout the learning process. As a
result, students were often unaware of their areas of weakness and did not have the
opportunity to improve before final assessments.

Moreover, the assessment practices in public schools were largely uniform, with little
differentiation to cater to the diverse needs and abilities of students. This one-size-fits-all
approach to assessment often disadvantaged students who struggled with traditional
testing formats or who excelled in practical, hands-on tasks rather than written exams. The
pressure to perform well in these high-stakes assessments also contributed to increased
stress and anxiety among students, further diminishing their engagement and motivation.
6.2. Assessment Strategies in Private Schools:
In contrast, private schools employed a more varied and balanced approach to assessment.
While summative assessments, such as end-of-term exams, were still used, there was a
greater emphasis on formative assessments that provided ongoing feedback to students.
Teachers in private schools regularly used quizzes, peer assessments, self-assessments, and
reflective journals to monitor student progress and provide constructive feedback. This
ongoing assessment process allowed students to identify their strengths and weaknesses,
set goals for improvement, and take ownership of their learning.

Private schools also placed a greater emphasis on differentiated assessment, recognizing

that students have different learning styles and abilities. Teachers often used a variety of
assessment methods, such as oral presentations, group projects, and creative assignments,
to cater to the diverse needs of their students. This approach not only allowed students to
demonstrate their understanding in different ways but also helped to reduce the pressure
and anxiety associated with traditional exams.

The use of rubrics and clear assessment criteria in private schools further contributed to a
more transparent and fair assessment process. Students were provided with a clear
understanding of what was expected of them and how their work would be evaluated. This
transparency helped to build trust between students and teachers and motivated students
to put in their best effort.

45
Overall Learning Environment

7.1. Public Schools:

The overall learning environment in public schools was characterized by several challenges
that impacted the effectiveness of learning activities. As mentioned earlier, the physical
infrastructure in many public schools was inadequate, with overcrowded classrooms, poor
ventilation, and insufficient teaching aids. These conditions created a less conducive
environment for learning, where students often felt uncomfortable and distracted.

The classroom atmosphere in public schools was generally more formal and structured, with
a strong emphasis on discipline and order. While this approach helped to maintain control in
large, overcrowded classrooms, it also limited students’ opportunities for self-expression
and creativity. The teacher-centered nature of instruction further contributed to a more
passive learning environment, where students had limited opportunities to engage in
meaningful discussions or collaborative activities.

In terms of social dynamics, public schools tended to have a more hierarchical structure,
with a clear division between teachers and students. This hierarchical relationship often
made it difficult for students to approach teachers for help or to express their opinions and
ideas. The lack of open communication and mutual respect in some public schools further
contributed to a less supportive and nurturing learning environment.

7.2. Private Schools:

Private schools, on the other hand, offered a more supportive and engaging learning
environment. The physical infrastructure in private schools was generally better, with well-
maintained classrooms, adequate seating, and access to a variety of teaching aids and
resources. The smaller class sizes in private schools also allowed for a more personalized
learning experience, where teachers could give individual attention to each student.

The classroom atmosphere in private schools was more informal and student-centered, with
an emphasis on collaboration, creativity, and critical thinking. Teachers in private schools
were more likely to encourage student participation, facilitate discussions, and create
opportunities for hands-on learning. This approach contributed to a more dynamic and
interactive learning environment, where students felt more engaged and motivated.

The social dynamics in private schools were also more egalitarian, with a stronger focus on
building positive relationships between teachers and students. Open communication,
mutual respect, and a sense of community were key features of the learning environment in
private schools. This supportive atmosphere helped students feel more comfortable,
confident, and willing to take risks in their learning.

Challenges and Barriers to Effective Learning Activities

8.1. Public Schools:

Several challenges and barriers were identified in public schools that hindered the
implementation of effective learning activities. The most significant barrier was the lack of
resources and infrastructure, as previously discussed. This lack of resources limited
teachers’ ability to incorporate a variety of learning activities into their lessons, resulting in a
reliance on traditional, teacher-centered methods.

46
Another major challenge in public schools was the high student-to-teacher ratio.
Overcrowded classrooms made it difficult for teachers to manage the class effectively,
provide individual attention to students, and implement student-centered learning
activities. The large class sizes also contributed to higher levels of noise and distractions,
making it challenging to create a focused and conducive learning environment.

The limited professional development opportunities available to public school teachers

were another barrier to effective learning activities. Without access to ongoing training and
support, teachers were often unable to stay updated on the latest educational practices and
were less confident in implementing new and innovative teaching methods. This lack of
professional development was further compounded by the rigid and bureaucratic structure
of the public education system, which often discouraged experimentation and innovation in
the classroom.

8.2. Private Schools:

While private schools generally offered a more supportive and resource-rich learning
environment, they also faced some challenges and barriers to effective learning activities.
One of the main challenges identified in private schools was the pressure to maintain high
academic standards and performance. This pressure often led to a strong emphasis on exam
preparation and rote learning, particularly in higher grades, which sometimes
overshadowed the focus on holistic development and student-centered learning.

Another challenge in private schools was the potential for inequality in access to resources
and opportunities. While many private schools in District Karak were well-resourced, there
was still a significant variation in the quality of education provided by different private
schools. Schools with higher fees and more affluent student populations were often able to
offer a wider range of learning activities and resources, while lower-cost private schools
faced financial constraints that limited their ability to provide the same level of educational
opportunities.

2. Conclusion:
This research has provided a comprehensive comparison of learning activities in public and
private sector elementary schools in District Karak, offering valuable insights into the
47
educational practices, challenges, and outcomes associated with each sector. The study has
highlighted significant differences in the approaches to teaching and learning between
public and private schools, as well as the varying impacts these approaches have on student
engagement, motivation, and overall educational experience. Through the analysis of
factors such as teaching methods, student participation, assessment strategies, learning
environments, and the challenges faced by both sectors, a clearer understanding of the
strengths and weaknesses of each educational context has emerged.

One of the key findings of this study is the distinct divergence in teaching methodologies
between public and private schools. Public schools, characterized by large class sizes and
limited resources, tend to rely heavily on teacher-centered approaches. These methods,
while structured and effective for delivering content to large groups, often limit
opportunities for student interaction, creativity, and critical thinking. The emphasis on direct
instruction and rote learning, coupled with the scarcity of interactive and student-centered
activities, has been shown to contribute to lower levels of student engagement and
motivation in public schools.

In contrast, private schools in District Karak have adopted more diverse and dynamic
teaching methods that prioritize student-centered learning. The use of group work, project-
based learning, and technology integration in private schools has been instrumental in
fostering higher levels of student engagement. These methods not only allow students to
actively participate in their learning but also encourage them to develop important skills
such as collaboration, problem-solving, and independent thinking. The smaller class sizes in
private schools further enhance the effectiveness of these approaches, enabling teachers to
provide more personalized attention and support to individual students.

Another significant finding of this study is the difference in the assessment strategies
employed by public and private schools. Public schools primarily focus on summative
assessments, with a strong emphasis on end-of-term exams and written tests. While these
assessments are effective for evaluating students’ recall of information, they often fail to
capture the full range of students’ abilities and do not provide opportunities for continuous
feedback and improvement. This approach can contribute to increased stress and anxiety
among students, as their performance is often judged solely based on high-stakes exams.

On the other hand, private schools employ a more balanced approach to assessment,
integrating both summative and formative assessment strategies. The use of ongoing
assessments, such as quizzes, peer assessments, and reflective journals, allows teachers to
monitor students’ progress throughout the learning process and provide timely feedback.
This approach not only helps students identify their strengths and areas for improvement
but also fosters a growth mindset, where students view learning as a continuous process of
development. Additionally, the use of differentiated assessment methods in private schools
ensures that the diverse needs and abilities of students are taken into account, leading to a
more inclusive and fair evaluation process.

The overall learning environment also emerged as a crucial factor influencing the
effectiveness of learning activities in both public and private schools. The physical
infrastructure in public schools, characterized by overcrowded classrooms and inadequate
resources, poses significant challenges to creating a conducive learning environment. The
formal and hierarchical classroom atmosphere, coupled with the lack of extracurricular
activities, further limits opportunities for student engagement and holistic development. In
48
contrast, private schools provide a more supportive and engaging learning environment,
with better infrastructure, smaller class sizes, and a focus on creating a positive classroom
atmosphere. The emphasis on open communication, mutual respect, and a sense of
community in private schools contributes to a more nurturing environment where students
feel valued and motivated to learn.

Despite the advantages offered by private schools, this study also acknowledges the
challenges they face, particularly in maintaining high academic standards and addressing
issues of inequality in access to resources. The competitive nature of the private school
sector, along with the pressure to meet the expectations of parents and administrators, can
create a high-stress environment for both students and teachers. Furthermore, while many
private schools are well-resourced, there remains a disparity in the quality of education
provided by different private institutions, highlighting the need for greater equity and
accessibility in the private education sector.

The findings of this research have several implications for policymakers, educators, and
stakeholders in the education sector. For public schools, there is a clear need to move
towards more student-centered teaching methods that promote active learning and critical
thinking. This shift would require not only changes in teaching practices but also
improvements in infrastructure and resources, as well as professional development
opportunities for teachers. Reducing class sizes and providing access to interactive learning
materials and technology are essential steps towards creating a more engaging and effective
learning environment in public schools.

For private schools, the challenge lies in balancing the demands of academic excellence with
the need for holistic development and inclusivity. While private schools have successfully
implemented innovative teaching and assessment methods, they must also ensure that
these approaches are accessible to all students, regardless of their background or financial
situation. Additionally, private schools should continue to foster a supportive and positive
learning environment that prioritizes student well-being and encourages lifelong learning.

This study also highlights the importance of assessment reform in both public and private
schools. Moving away from a reliance on high-stakes exams towards a more balanced
approach that includes formative assessments and differentiated evaluation methods is
crucial for supporting student learning and development. By providing ongoing feedback
and recognizing the diverse abilities of students, schools can help students build confidence,
set goals for improvement, and take ownership of their learning journey.

In conclusion, this research has shed light on the distinct characteristics, strengths, and
challenges of public and private sector elementary schools in District Karak. While private
schools have demonstrated greater flexibility and innovation in their teaching and
assessment practices, public schools continue to face significant barriers that hinder the
implementation of effective learning activities. Addressing these challenges will require a
concerted effort from policymakers, educators, and stakeholders to improve the quality of
education in public schools and ensure that all students have access to a supportive,
engaging, and inclusive learning environment. By building on the strengths of both public
and private education systems, it is possible to create a more equitable and effective
educational landscape that meets the diverse needs of students in District Karak and
beyond.

49
[Link]:

The research conducted on the comparison of learning activities in public and private sector
elementary schools in District Karak has revealed a number of key insights into the strengths
and weaknesses of each sector. Based on these findings, several suggestions can be made to
enhance the effectiveness of learning activities and improve educational outcomes across
both public and private schools. These suggestions are aimed at policymakers, educators,
administrators, and other stakeholders who are in a position to influence and implement
changes within the education system in District Karak.

1. Promotion of Student-Centered Learning in Public Schools:

One of the major findings of this study was the dominance of teacher-centered methods in
public schools, which often limit student engagement and critical thinking. To address this
issue, it is recommended that public schools in District Karak gradually transition towards
more student-centered learning approaches. This can be achieved by integrating methods
such as project-based learning, group discussions, and inquiry-based activities into the
curriculum. Professional development programs for teachers should focus on training them
in these methods, ensuring they are equipped to facilitate active learning and foster a more
interactive classroom environment.

2. Improvement of Infrastructure and Resources in Public Schools:

The research highlighted significant disparities in the physical infrastructure and availability
of resources between public and private schools. To create a more conducive learning
environment, it is essential to address these gaps in public schools. This can include reducing
class sizes, providing adequate classroom furniture, and ensuring access to modern teaching
aids and technology. Additionally, schools should be equipped with sufficient learning
materials, such as textbooks, manipulatives, and multimedia resources, to support a diverse
range of learning activities. Investment in infrastructure and resources is crucial for enabling
the implementation of more engaging and effective teaching methods.

3. Adoption of Balanced Assessment Strategies:

50
The study found that public schools predominantly rely on summative assessments, which
can lead to increased stress among students and may not fully capture their learning
progress. It is suggested that public schools adopt a more balanced approach to assessment,
incorporating both summative and formative assessments. Formative assessments, such as
quizzes, peer assessments, and reflective journals, should be used to provide continuous
feedback and support students’ learning throughout the academic year. This approach can
help students identify areas for improvement and encourage a growth mindset, where
learning is viewed as an ongoing process.

4. Professional Development and Support for Teachers:

Both public and private schools would benefit from enhanced professional development
opportunities for teachers. Regular training sessions should be organized to introduce
teachers to new pedagogical techniques, classroom management strategies, and methods
for integrating technology into their lessons. Furthermore, mentorship programs could be
established where experienced teachers guide and support newer educators in adopting
innovative teaching practices. Ensuring that teachers have access to the latest educational
research and resources will enable them to continuously improve their teaching methods
and better meet the needs of their students.

5. Strengthening School-Community Relationships:

To improve the overall educational experience for students, it is important to foster strong
relationships between schools, parents, and the wider community. Schools should engage
parents in their children’s learning process by organizing workshops, parent-teacher
meetings, and community events. Additionally, partnerships with local organizations and
businesses could be established to provide students with real-world learning opportunities,
such as internships, guest lectures, and field trips. Building a supportive and involved
community around the school can create a more enriching learning environment and
enhance students’ academic and personal development.

6. Focus on Equity and Accessibility in Private Schools:

While private schools in District Karak have demonstrated innovation in teaching methods
and assessment strategies, there remains a need to address issues of equity and
accessibility. Private schools should ensure that their educational practices are inclusive and
cater to the diverse needs of all students, regardless of their socio-economic background.
This can be achieved by offering scholarships, reducing tuition fees for underprivileged
students, and implementing inclusive education policies that accommodate students with
special needs. By making high-quality education accessible to a broader population, private
schools can contribute to reducing educational disparities in the district.

7. Collaborative Efforts Between Public and Private Schools:

The research suggests that both public and private schools have unique strengths that could
be mutually beneficial if shared. Establishing collaborative networks between public and
private schools could facilitate the exchange of best practices in teaching, assessment, and
resource management. For example, public schools could benefit from the innovative
teaching methods employed by private schools, while private schools could gain insights
into addressing challenges related to resource constraints and large class sizes. Such
collaborations could be facilitated through joint workshops, teacher exchange programs,
and shared professional development initiatives.

51
8. Regular Monitoring and Evaluation of Educational Practices:
Finally, it is crucial that the educational practices in both public and private schools are
regularly monitored and evaluated to ensure they are meeting the needs of students.
Schools should implement systems for tracking the effectiveness of different teaching
methods, assessment strategies, and learning activities. Feedback from students, teachers,
and parents should be actively sought and used to inform ongoing improvements in the
educational process. By maintaining a continuous cycle of evaluation and adaptation,
schools can remain responsive to the changing needs of their students and the broader
educational landscape.

4. SUMMARY:
The comparison of learning activities in public and private sector elementary schools in
District Karak highlights the distinct strengths and challenges faced by each type of
institution. Public schools often struggle with resource limitations, outdated infrastructure,
and less flexible teaching methods, which can hinder student engagement and learning
outcomes. In contrast, private schools generally benefit from better resources, more
innovative teaching approaches, and a higher degree of parental involvement, leading to
better student performance.

However, private schools must ensure their practices are inclusive and accessible to all
students, promoting equity and comprehensive assessment strategies. The study
emphasizes the importance of improving infrastructure, technology integration, and
professional development in public schools to create a more conducive learning
environment. Additionally, fostering strong partnerships between schools, parents, and the
community is crucial for enhancing student outcomes in both sectors.

The findings suggest that collaboration between public and private schools can lead to the
sharing of best practices, benefiting both sectors and driving the overall improvement of
educational standards in District Karak. The ultimate aim is to provide all students with
quality education that prepares them for future success, regardless of their socio-economic
background.

Annex-A
REFERENCES

1. Ahmad, I., & Khan, M. (2012). A comparative study of the academic achievement of public
and private elementary school students. Journal of Educational Research, 15(2), 112-121.

2. Ali, S., & Rehman, H. (2014). The impact of school resources on the performance of
students in private and public schools: A case study of Pakistan. International Journal of
Educational Development, 34(1), 22-31.
52
3. Aslam, M., & Kingdon, G. (2011). What can teachers do to raise student achievement?
Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 559-574.

4. Ayub, M., & Khan, W. (2015). Teaching practices and academic performance: A
comparative analysis of private and public schools in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Pakistan Journal
of Educational Research, 18(1), 77-89.

5. Bashir, R., & Nadeem, M. (2013). A comparative study of the effectiveness of teaching
methods in public and private sector schools. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 211-221.

6. Farooq, M. S., & Shafique, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ quality of academic
performance: A case of secondary school level. Journal of Quality and Technology
Management, 7(2), 1-14.

7. Khan, M. I., & Rehman, S. (2016). The role of school management in enhancing learning
outcomes: A comparative study of public and private sector schools. Pakistan Journal of
Social Sciences, 36(2), 357-368.

8. Malik, S., & Qureshi, R. (2018). Impact of classroom learning environment on students’
academic performance in public and private schools. Journal of Education and Educational
Development, 5(1), 72-87.

9. Rehman, A., & Haider, K. (2017). Public versus private schools: A comparative study on
academic achievements of elementary school students in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Educational
Research International, 6(2), 85-96.

10. Shaukat, S., & Zafar, I. (2010). A comparative analysis of instructional techniques in
public and private sector schools in Pakistan. Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 45-60.

Annex-B
QUESTIONER

Assalamualaikum dear respondents,

I am Mateen Ullah, currently pursuing my [Link] from Bannu University. As part

of my research on the Comparison of Learning Activities in Public and Private Sector
Elementary Schools in District Karak, I am conducting this survey. Your participation in
answering the following questions will greatly contribute to my study. The information
gathered will be used solely for academic purposes and will remain confidential.

Thank you for your time and cooperation.

Respondent information:
Name: _______________________________________ AGE:;_______________________
SchoolName: ______________________________________________________________
Highest level of education: ___________________________________________________
53
__________________________________________________________________________

Section 1: Demographic Information

1. Name of the School:
- Public
- Private

2. Location:
- Urban
- Rural

3. Position of the Respondent:

- Teacher
- Head Teacher
- Student
- Parent

4. Years of Experience (for teachers/head teachers):

- 0-5 years
- 6-10 years
- 11-15 years
- 16+ years

Section 2: Learning Activities

5. Frequency of Using Various Learning Activities:
- How often do you use the following activities in your classroom?
(Scale: Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always)
- Group Work
- Discussions/Debates
- Project-Based Learning
- Use of Multimedia
- Hands-On Activities
- Homework Assignments
- Field Trips
- Role Playing/Simulations
- Peer Teaching

6. Student Engagement:
- How engaged are students during learning activities?
(Scale: Not Engaged, Slightly Engaged, Moderately Engaged, Highly Engaged)

7. Teacher’s Role:
- How do you describe the role of the teacher in the learning activities?
(Multiple choice: Instructor, Facilitator, Guide, Observer)

8. Use of Technology in Learning:

- How often do you integrate technology into your lessons?
(Scale: Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always)
54
Section 3: Quality and Effectiveness of Learning Activities
9. Effectiveness of Learning Activities:
- How effective are the learning activities in improving student performance?
(Scale: Not Effective, Slightly Effective, Moderately Effective, Highly Effective)

10. Challenges Faced:

- What are the main challenges you face in implementing learning activities?
(Open-ended)

11. Resources Availability:

- Are adequate resources available for conducting learning activities?
(Scale: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly Agree)

12. Support from Administration:

- How supportive is the school administration in facilitating learning activities?
(Scale: Not Supportive, Slightly Supportive, Moderately Supportive, Highly Supportive)

Section 4: General Perceptions and Recommendations

13. Perception of Learning Activities:
- How do you perceive the quality of learning activities in your school compared to other
schools in the district?
(Open-ended)

14. Suggestions for Improvement:

- What suggestions do you have for improving learning activities in your school?
(Open-ended)

15. Additional Comments:

- Any additional comments or thoughts on learning activities in public vs. private sector
schools?
(Open-ended)

The End.

55