100% found this document useful (2 votes)
65 views55 pages

Development Aid and Sustainable Economic Growth in Africa: The Limits of Western and Chinese Engagements 1st Edition Simone Raudino (Auth.)

Simone

Uploaded by

moudirekor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
65 views55 pages

Development Aid and Sustainable Economic Growth in Africa: The Limits of Western and Chinese Engagements 1st Edition Simone Raudino (Auth.)

Simone

Uploaded by

moudirekor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Experience Seamless Full Ebook Downloads for Every Genre at textbookfull.

com

Development Aid and Sustainable Economic Growth in


Africa: The Limits of Western and Chinese
Engagements 1st Edition Simone Raudino (Auth.)

[Link]
sustainable-economic-growth-in-africa-the-limits-of-western-
and-chinese-engagements-1st-edition-simone-raudino-auth/

OR CLICK BUTTON

DOWNLOAD NOW

Explore and download more ebook at [Link]


Recommended digital products (PDF, EPUB, MOBI) that
you can download immediately if you are interested.

Economic Growth and Development: Chinese Agribusiness


Enterprises Development Lei Sun

[Link]
chinese-agribusiness-enterprises-development-lei-sun/

[Link]

Sustainable Growth and Development of Economic Systems


Contradictions in the Era of Digitalization and
Globalization Svetlana Ashmarina
[Link]
of-economic-systems-contradictions-in-the-era-of-digitalization-and-
globalization-svetlana-ashmarina/
[Link]

Determinants of Economic Growth in Africa Almas Heshmati

[Link]
africa-almas-heshmati/

[Link]

Supporting Inclusive Growth and Sustainable Development in


Africa - Volume II: Transforming Infrastructure
Development 1st Edition Elena G. Popkova
[Link]
sustainable-development-in-africa-volume-ii-transforming-
infrastructure-development-1st-edition-elena-g-popkova/
[Link]
Sustainable Economic Development: Green Economy and Green
Growth 1st Edition Walter Leal Filho

[Link]
green-economy-and-green-growth-1st-edition-walter-leal-filho/

[Link]

Doing Business in Africa: From Economic Growth to Societal


Development Suzanne M. Apitsa

[Link]
economic-growth-to-societal-development-suzanne-m-apitsa/

[Link]

Physical Limits to Economic Growth Perspectives of


Economic Social and Complexity Science 1st Edition Roberto
Burlando
[Link]
perspectives-of-economic-social-and-complexity-science-1st-edition-
roberto-burlando/
[Link]

Economic Growth and Development in the Tropics 1st Edition


Sook Rei Tan

[Link]
the-tropics-1st-edition-sook-rei-tan/

[Link]

China's Economic Growth: Towards Sustainable Economic


Development and Social Justice: Volume I: Domestic and
International Economic Policies 1st Edition John Joshua
(Auth.)
[Link]
sustainable-economic-development-and-social-justice-volume-i-domestic-
and-international-economic-policies-1st-edition-john-joshua-auth/
[Link]
International Political Economy Series

Development Aid and Sustainable


Economic Growth in Africa

The Limits of Western and Chinese Engagements

Simone Raudino
International Political Economy Series

Series Editor
Timothy M. Shaw
Visiting Professor at the University of
Massachusetts Boston, USA
Emeritus Professor at the University of
London, UK
The global political economy is in flux as a series of cumulative crises
impacts its organization and governance. The IPE series has tracked its
development in both analysis and structure over the last three decades.
It has always had a concentration on the global South. Now the South
increasingly challenges the North as the centre of development, also
reflected in a growing number of submissions and publications on
indebted Eurozone economies in Southern Europe. An indispensable
resource for scholars and researchers, the series examines a variety of capi-
talisms and connections by focusing on emerging economies, companies
and sectors, debates and policies. It informs diverse policy communities
as the established trans-Atlantic North declines and ‘the rest’, especially
the BRICS, rise.

More information about this series at


[Link]
Simone Raudino

Development Aid and


Sustainable Economic
Growth in Africa
The Limits of Western and Chinese Engagements
Simone Raudino
GAP Consultants
Hong Kong

International Political Economy Series


ISBN 978-3-319-38935-6 ISBN 978-3-319-38936-3 (eBook)
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-38936-3

Library of Congress Control Number: 2016953825

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016


This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of
translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval,
electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information
in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub-
lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the
material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.

Cover image © Rob Friedman/[Link]

Printed on acid-free paper

This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by Springer Nature


The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
To Coco,
For what lies ahead is far better than anything we leave behind
PREFACE

The core ideas developed in this book matured during professional stints
with the United Nations (Angola, 2005–2006) and the European Union
(South Africa, 2006–2008). Institutional field work allowed first-hand
access to analyses, databases, reports and other sources of structured
information from the Italian government, the United Nations and the
European Union.9 References to government and international organiza-
tions’ information which are not properly referenced in the text should be
understood as being elaborated or accessed in the exercise of past profes-
sional duties.
These ideas have been further elaborated during my doctoral research
at The University of Hong Kong (2010–2013), which has run parallel to
the experience of founder and director of GAP Consultants Ltd, a Hong
Kong registered limited company providing business advisory services
and engaging in commodity trade between China, Europe and Africa.
The private sector has proven fertile ground to develop ideas contained
in this book, since it provided real-life exposure to a number of economic
variables—including commercial regulations; local administrative policies;
fiscal, financial and banking provisions; company rules; informal business
practices; and local socio-anthropological features—that have played a key
role in the Asian economic miracle. Many of these variables would have
easily slipped under my academic radar had I not been obliged to face
(and sometimes fight against) them in daily business practices—including
the Chinese government control over the currency exchange market or
Chinese standard business practices in dealing with foreign competitors.

vii
viii PREFACE

Since September 2013, research for this book has also been comple-
mented with new field experience as a project officer at the European
Union Delegation to Afghanistan. Although Afghanistan is not touched
by many of the dynamics discussed here—including massive Chinese
investments from the early 2000s onwards and large export volumes of
natural resources—, it nonetheless maintains a number of similarities
with most Sub-Saharan African countries. As a Least Developed Country,
Afghanistan and the average Sub-Saharan country have a high percent-
age of their populations depending upon subsistence agriculture, little to
no manufacturing capacity, a virtually useless right of industrial access to
OECD markets at zero import duties, high official development assis-
tance levels, limited amounts of inward foreign direct investments and
large capital flight outflows.
In this respect, it is interesting to notice how Ashraf Ghani replied to
a question on the risk of Chinese involvement in Afghanistan and the
meaning of his Beijing trip right after being sworn in as President of
Afghanistan: “[…] we are not going to be an African country, because we
are going to determine our fate […]”, while also pointing out that “[…]
mining companies in the West did horrors everywhere in the world and
we are learning from those”. President Ghani concluded that “ODA has
not made a single country rich—it’s investment and trade and getting the
institutions right that [entail] change”—a line that could also represent
the summa of this book.10

Simone Raudino
GAP Consultants, Hong Kong
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This book is the result of multidisciplinary work carried out at the cross-
roads of academia, government and business. People from different walks
of life have contributed to it—it is an honour and a pleasure acknowledg-
ing their influence and assistance.
There are persons to be thanked for this remarkable journey even
before it started. I am grateful to Julia Strauss from School of Oriental and
African Studies (SOAS) and Barry Sautman from Hong Kong University
of Science and Technology (HKUST) for pointing me to the European
Study Department at the University of Hong Kong (HKU), which pro-
vided the perfect combination of multidisciplinary expertise and flexibility
needed for this research.
My major debt of gratitude goes to Wayne Cristaudo from Charles
Darwin University and Roland Vogt from HKU for having believed in
an unorthodox project. Useful ideas and generous words of advice came
from HKU academic staff and researchers. I would like to particularly
thank Ian Holliday, Stephan Auer, Andreas Leutzsch, Tim Gruenewald,
Denis Meyer, Üner Daglier, Martin Chung, Uzma Ashraf, Kristina
Tolinsson and Erick Komolo for their availability to engage in discussions
on topics relating to politics, national cultures and international relations.
I am indebted to Xianming Zhou and Larry Qiu at the HKU Faculty of
Business and Economics for discussion on macroeconomic and interna-
tional trade issues.
The original project proposal benefited from exchanges with authors,
diplomats and civil servants working on development, including Robert

ix
x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Calderisi, David Sogge, Carlo Cibó, Pier Forlano, Tembi Tambo and
Eunice Rendón Cárdenas. Heartfelt thanks for earlier draft revisions and
comments also go to Adams Bodomo, Arlo Poletti, Emily Winterbotham,
Shraddha Mahapatra and Kenichi Masamoto.
Former and present EU colleagues have added valuable criticisms and
insightful perspectives to original ideas relating to Europe’s interests,
belief systems and political vision in its work with developing countries;
they include Patrick Simonnet, Andrea Rossi, Milko van Gool, Martina
Spernbauer, Gabriel Moyano Vital and Gaël Griette.
A number of ideas contained in this book are the result of creative
discussions and business initiatives that owe much to the entrepreneurial
communities in Hong Kong and the Guangdong region. In economics
as in other fields, there is nothing that can impress learning processes as
much as hands-on experience—not the seduction of sophisticated narra-
tive, nor the elegance of theories or the solidity of water-tight logic. For
their availability in sharing entrepreneurial experiences, their passion and
their resoluteness to engage in the never-ending trial-and-error reality of
business life, I thank, among others, Zumin Luo, Sidney Yankson, Andrew
Kwok, Ron Hevey, Connie Han and Juan Carlos Sanchez.
I must extend many thanks to my editors and Proofreader at Springer—
Timothy Shaw, Judith Allan and Baghyalakshmi Jagannathan—for their
generous support, useful advises and patient work in the long revision
process that made this book eventually see the light of day.
Last but not least, I am grateful to all those who made this book pos-
sible through their emotional and logistic support, with special gratitude
to Jill and Maya for their unfaltering welcoming presence even during the
rainy days of this long journey.
CONTENTS

1 A Practitioner’s Perspective on Development Aid 1

2 The Theory of Economic Development 43

3 The Praxis of Economic Growth: Lessons from History 79

4 A Quantitative Assessment of Africa’s International


Economic Relations 129

5 A Qualitative Analysis of Africa–West Economic


Relations 165

6 A Qualitative Analysis of Africa–China Economic


Relations 209

Conclusions 245

Index 257

xi
ABBREVIATIONS

ACP African Caribbean Pacific


AD Anti-Dumping
AfDB African Development Bank
AGOA African Growth and Opportunity Act
AIS African Investor Survey
ASEAN Association of South-East Asian Nations
AU African Union
BENELUX Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxemburg
BIT Bilateral Investment Treaties
BOP Balance of Payments
BRICS Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa
CA Current Account
CABC China Africa Business Council
CADF China Africa Development Fund
CARICOM Caribbean Community
CCP China Communist Party
CDB China Development Bank
CEMAC Economic and Monetary Community of Central Africa
CEPGL Economic Community of the Great Lakes Countries
CIC China Investment Corporation
COMESA Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa
CPC Communist Party of China
CSP Country Strategy Papers
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
DAC Development Aid Committee
DC Domestic Company
DDA Doha Development Agenda

xiii
xiv ABBREVIATIONS

DE Domestic Entrepreneur
DG Director General
DRC Democratic Republic of Congo
EAC East African Community
EBA Everything But Arms
EC European Commission
ECA Economic Commission for Africa
ECCAS Economic Community of Central African States
ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States
EDF European Development Fund
EIB European Investment Bank
EP European Parliament
EPA Economic Partnership Agreements
EU European Union
ExIm China Export Import Bank
FA Financial Account
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
FDI Foreign Direct Investment
FE Foreign Entrepreneur
FOCAC Forum on China-Africa Cooperation
FTA Free Trade Agreement
GATT General Agreement on Tariff and Trade
GDE Gross Domestic Expense
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GNI Gross National Income
GNP Gross National Product
GVC Global Value Chain
HDI Human Development Index
HIPC Highly Indebted Poor Countries
H-O Heckscher-Ohlin
IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
IBSA India, Brazil and South Africa
ICT Information and Communication Technology
IDA International Development Association
IFC International Finance Corporation
IFI International Financial Institutions
IMF International Monetary Fund
IMP Investment Monitoring Platform
IO International Organization
IOM International Organization for Migration
IPA Investment Promotion Agency
ISI Import Substitution Industrialization
ABBREVIATIONS xv

ISIC International Standard Industrial Classification


JV Joint Venture
LAD Least Absolute Deviations
LDC Least Developed Countries
M&A Merger and Acquisition
MAI Multilateral Agreement for Investment
MDG Millennium Development Goals
MENA Middle East and North Africa
MERCOSUR Mercado Común del Sur
MIGA Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency
MIP Multiannual Indicative Programme
MOFA Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs
MOFCOM Chinese Ministry of Commerce
NAFTA North America Free Trade Association
NAMA Non-Agricultural Market Access
NAO National Authorizing Officer
NDRC National Development and Reform Commission
NGO Non-Governmental Organization
NIE Newly Industrialized Economies
OCT Overseas Countries and Territories
ODA Official Development Assistance
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
O&M Operations and Maintenance
OOF Other Official Flows
OPEC Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
PF Private Flows
PISA Program for International Study Assessment
PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers
PTA Preferential Trade Agreement
R&D Research and Development
REC Regional Economic Community
RMC Regional Member Countries
RTA Regional Trade Agreement
SADC Southern African Development Community
SAP Structural Adjustment Program
SASAC State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission
SDR Special Drawing Rights
SG Secretary General
SME Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises
SOE State-Owned Enterprise
SPX Subcontracting and Partnership Exchange
SSA Sub-Saharan Africa
xvi ABBREVIATIONS

TFP Total Factor Productivity


TIFA Trade and Investment Framework Agreement
TNC Transnational Corporation
TRIPS Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
UAE United Arab Emirates
UK United Kingdom
UN United Nations
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organization
USA United States of America
VC Venture Capital
WB World Bank
WDI World Development Indicators
WFOE Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise
WOE Wholly Owned Enterprise
WTO World Trade Organization
LIST OF FIGURES

Fig. 1.1 Conceptual box of Western development aid:


how institutional discourse presents ODA 10
Fig. 1.2 Institutional view of development aid’s production cycle 12
Fig. 1.3 Stock of ODA inflows to Africa (1960–2010) compared
to the cost of major USA financial operations, 2011
constant prices, billion USD (Source: OECD) 23
Fig. 1.4 Inward ODA (billion USD) and GDP growth per
capita (constant prices 2005, constant exchange rate
2005) in India, China, Brazil and Africa, over the
period 1970–2010 (Source: OECD, UNCTAD) 25
Fig. 1.5 GDP per capita of Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa,
constant prices (2000) and constant exchange rate (2000),
USD, 1970–2012 (Source: UNCTAD) 27
Fig. 1.6 Total ODA to Sub-Saharan Africa, constant prices
(2000) and constant exchange rate (2000),
million USD, 1970–2012 (Source: OECD) 27
Fig. 1.7 Africa’s economic relations with the EU, USA and China:
relative proportions of ODA, trade FDI, and capital flight
(estimate) (Source: European Commission, OECD, Global
Trade, USA Census Bureau) 29
Fig. 4.1 Sum of current accounts of non-oil exporting, non-mineral
exporting Sub-Saharan African countries except South Africa,
1980–2014, million USD at current prices and
current exchange rate (Source: UNCTAD) 133
Fig. 4.2 Sum of current accounts of all Sub-Saharan African countries
except South Africa, 1980–2014, million USD at current
prices and current exchange rate (Source: UNCTAD) 133

xvii
xviii LIST OF FIGURES

Fig. 4.3 EU–African ACP countries trade structure: EU imports (red),


2011 (Source: European Commission). 135
Fig. 4.4 EU–African ACP countries trade structure: EU exports (blue),
2011 (Source: European Commission). 136
Fig. 4.5 EU–African ACP countries trade balance
by industry, 2011 (Source: European Commission) 137
Fig. 4.6 FDI towards Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa:
countries having received more than 5 billion USD in
FDI stock + rest of Sub-Saharan Africa, excluding
South Africa (Source: UNCTAD) 152
LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1 Key economic and financial indicators in Africa–EU, Africa–USA


and Africa–China relations, current prices (2011) and
current exchange rate (2011), billion USD (Source:
European Commission, OECD, Global Trade, USA
Census Bureau) 30
Table 1.2 USA–Africa, EU–Africa and PRC–Africa 2010 trade
balances, current exchange rates, billion USD (Source:
European Commission, Global Trade, USA Census Bureau) 31

xix
INTRODUCTION

What do we know about Africa’s economic relations with its international


partners? Can these relations be audited—in the same way we audit, for
example, business relations between two companies—to determine what
the involved parties are, respectively, gaining from their relation? If so,
what shall be the yardstick of measurement to determine the “costs” and
“benefits” of each party? Once we have chosen such yardstick, can we
resolve whether one of the parties is benefiting more than the others?
“Development Aid and Sustainable Growth in Africa” strives to answer
these questions by investigating economic relations between Africa and its
most important politico-economic partners: the European Union and the
USA (as a proxy for the West)1 and China. It provides a bird’s-eye view
of these relations and their role—if any—in Africa’s traditional economic
backwardness. It answers fairly neat research questions, thus renouncing
a comprehensive inquiry into the reasons and responsibilities for today’s
division of wealth between “haves” and “have-nots” nations. To draw a
metaphor, if the object of inquiry was cancer (poverty), the book does not
try establishing a comprehensive list of cancer’s causes or prioritizing these
causes by order of importance; what it does instead is studying one spe-
cific variable—say diet (international economic relations)—to understand
whether it can be correlated to cancer. The study remains acutely aware
of the fact that many other variables have already been positively corre-
lated to cancer: smoke (corruption), genetic predisposition (geography),
air pollution (population density) and electromagnetic exposure (culture),
to name but a few.

xxi
xxii INTRODUCTION

Out of metaphor, this book does not suggest that Africa’s international
relations can be taken as the only reason for the socio-economic situation
of African countries, nor does it try establishing a hierarchy between the
different mechanisms behind poverty. Similarly, it does not seek a com-
prehensive explanation of Africa’s socio-economic standing, nor does it
propose a general theory of what Thomas Malthus considered “the grand
object of all inquiries in political economy”2: the causes of the wealth
and poverty of nations. Instead, it tries establishing a positive correlation
between Africa’s international economic relations and the continent’s
lack of endogenous development mechanisms, to subsequently provide
an interpretative analysis of the mechanisms linking the two phenomena.

SCOPE, EPISTEMOLOGY AND KEY SOURCES


The book engages with wide conceptual geographical units, including
“Africa”, “West” and “China”. Over and beyond the issue of a neat opera-
tionalization of these concepts,3 it is legitimate to question whether these
areas have enough in common to be part of single conceptual units. Many
an international scholar question the meaningfulness of putting under the
same conceptual umbrella geopolitical regions as fragmented and het-
erogeneous as Africa’s multiple subregions, or even countries pertaining
to different continents as those grouped under the concept of “West”.
Africa is a geographically, culturally, ethnically and, even, economically
fragmented continent: grouping these realities under a single conceptual
unit, the argument goes, is an oversimplification of a more complex reality.
Similarly, the concept of “West” is blurred: from a cultural perspective, we
can neither say that countries such as Turkey, post-Apartheid South Africa
or Brazil outright pertain to the West—nor can we say the contrary. From a
geopolitical and military perspective, even the clear-cut demarcation oper-
ated by the Cold War—which understood the West as an area of homoge-
neous political, military and economic interests, stretching across countries
pertaining to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and its key
allies—has, since 1989, expanded to include areas of Central and Eastern
Europe that were formerly under the influence of the Soviet Union, as well
as countries hitherto pertaining to the Non-Aligned Movement. From
an economic perspective, borders are even more blurred: the traditional
conceptualization of the West as a wealthy centre (including non-Western
cultural realities such as Japan) plus a few client states on the one hand and
the rest of the world—the so-called “underdeveloped” periphery—on the
INTRODUCTION xxiii

other, has come under multiple challenges by the reality of international


economics, with “old rich clubs”, such as the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD), progressively accepting mem-
bers from the periphery and “new rich clubs”, such as the Organization
of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) or the BRICS (Brazil,
Russia, India, China and South Africa) group of countries, being in con-
stant formation.
Borders between neatly organized clusters of countries are artificial and
naturally imply some form of oversimplification. In fact, any generalization
entails an oversimplification. Yet, as this book argues, history does show
a number of recurrent patterns laying common ground beneath regions
that could otherwise be superficially read as significantly different. Why
a desertic, land-locked, sparsely populated, poor in natural resources and
prone to drought country such as Niger knows today similar economic
fundamentals and social figures to a coastal, green, rich-in-commodity
country such as Sierra Leone is something that can be explained on differ-
ent levels. It would reasonably be possible to delve into the peculiarities
of each country’s climate, history, social traditions, agricultural systems,
access to commercial routes and more, to eventually establish that all these
factors contributed in pushing both countries towards independent but
similar economic fates. Conversely, it would be possible engaging a simi-
lar analytical process by beginning from these countries’ similarities first,
including the political role that colonialism and globalization originally
assigned them between the eighteenth and the nineteenth century, to
conclude that such analogies might have contributed in shaping their cur-
rent politico-economic role within the world order. Similar considerations
could be replicated when it comes to identify the common variables that
shaped these countries’ economic histories.
In his seminal work, “Theory of International Politics”, Kenneth Waltz
famously distinguished between “reductionist” and “systemic” theories,
defining the former as theories dealing with the behaviour of parts and
explaining “[…] international outcomes through elements located at
national or subnational level” (Waltz 1979: 60), and the latter as theo-
ries conceiving of causes operating at the international level, including an
anarchical structure affecting behaviour through socialization and com-
petition among its actors. The difference between the two theories is not
only in the object of analysis, if not in the way of arranging their materi-
als and causes. Kenneth Waltz’s landmark distinction is not only impor-
tant for defining two levels of customary analysis in international relations
xxiv INTRODUCTION

(national and subnational vs. international), but also for introducing the
idea that states’ behavioural patterns can be studied either by beginning
from their differences (specific features of each state) or by beginning from
their commonalities (the most important being their embeddedness in an
international anarchical system rewarding specific behaviours while pun-
ishing others).
Every theory claims its own domain and the one used in this book is
no exception, being inspired by Waltz’s understanding of systemic the-
ory. A study on the impact of international economic relations upon the
African continent alone will not explain the role of domestic corruption
upon widespread poverty in the continent, or why Botswana, contrary to
some of its neighbours, has managed to engage in a successful expansion
of its middle class from the 1980s onwards. It will not, for a number of
reasons, including the fact that it is not intended to do so. Any study has
to accept the physiological limitations that epistemology imposes upon
social research, including the depth versus breadth; qualitative versus
quantitative; and inductive versus deductive trade-offs. This book wilfully
renounces to explain variables that either lie outside its research question
or impact the research object in the way Waltz describes as “reductionist”.
Nonetheless, by shedding light on the centrality of some structural eco-
nomic variables in international relations, the study invites scrutiny on the
role of these same variables also at national and subnational level.4
This work is interested in showing structural patterns of economic
engagement rather than explaining how specific economic variables have
worked in specific countries within specific periods. The research dissects
Africa’s economic dynamics to analyse that particular bit which relates
to its international economic relations and their effects upon domestic
dynamics. It ignores domestic variables such as domestically nurtured cor-
ruption, autochthon cultures, local diseases, traditional social structures,
religions and more. Because of this, the phenomena under scrutiny cannot
represent the whole set of variables that contributed in shaping the situa-
tion in which African economies are today. In line with a number of theo-
ries in political science, international economics and law, this book assigns
to the “international component” a fundamental weight in determining
the politico-economic path that many formerly colonized countries have
eventually undertaken.
Within the “international component”, variables considered having
logical and ontological priority in determining Africa’s economic relations
have been given priority. These variables are, by and large, captured by
INTRODUCTION xxv

the balance of payments (BoP) items of the analysed regions, plus capi-
tal flight and migration. In the interest of avoiding a wild proliferation
of variables, other international factors—which no doubt contributed to
the situation being analysed—have not being considered. Throughout the
text, examples are provided to show how historical instances fit within the
general patterns described by the theory—yet, these examples represent
exemplificatory cases with explanatory purposes rather than rigorously
analysed datasets.5
A second epistemological assumption is based on the idea that the the-
ory of political economy is shaped by a different set of goals and assess-
ment criteria than its praxis.6 This difference reflects a cleavage existing
between academia on the one hand and political or business institutions
on the other hand. Whereas theoretical contributions in academia need to
abide by scholarly standards of novelty and originality of thought, political
and business practices are guided by rather contingent factors, including
pragmatic interests and power relations between the involved social actors.
What is contingent is not necessarily novel and what is novel is not neces-
sarily contingent. International economic policies serving the interests of
specific social actors are unlikely to be dismissed on the argument of hav-
ing been implemented for “too long” or for failing to say anything new.
Institutions such as serfdom, indenture and economic monopolies have
not been challenged because they had been used for “too long”; they
have been challenged—and reversed—because of a change of power rela-
tions between different social classes: under new circumstances, formerly
disadvantaged socio-economic actors have muscled up and took on the
privileges of a minority. The difference with the life cycle of social theories
is stark: academic theories, as other intellectual products, operate under
the constant requirement of innovation for innovation’s sake—the self-
justifying need for originality of thought being a legitimate propeller of
change across academic theories.
Mainstream economic circles consider a number of charges against
neoliberal policies as out of fashion, because they have long been discussed
with little results in mainstream thinking or policy praxis. In the Western
world, normative perceptions on the democracy-liberal nexus are deeply
engrained in the public opinion, to such an extent that in many intellectual
environments it is considered in between the tedious and the intellectu-
ally shabby to point out that Europe has regularly sustained gruesome
dictators in Africa and the Middle East—Muammar Gheddafi, Ben Ali
and Hosni Mubarak being the most recent examples, the list including
xxvi INTRODUCTION

however dozens of other cases—in exchange for their geopolitical alliances


and open market policies. Considerations on Latin American authoritarian
regimes propped by the USA are typically met with similar attitudes. This
research assumes that development theory can contribute towards public
policy only by avoiding a detachment from economic and political praxes,
something that necessarily entails posing old questions that have already
elicited a wealth of theoretical answers. Although many would see struc-
tural economic theories as thoroughly refuted, the econometric analysis
offered in this book suggests that many aspects of these theories still hold
their relevance in describing West–Africa and China–Africa policy praxes
and that to explore these praxes does not mean to exclude or downplay
other explanations of poverty.
The discussion developed in the book remains mindful of the fact that
in ontological reality there is little separation between the analytical and
the normative spheres. A “benign reading” of current international politi-
cal relations necessarily implies a problem with the domestic management,
culture or institutional setting of underdeveloped countries. An approach
that places the locus of Africa’s problems upon the lack of domestic
reforms takes attention away from the international structure, suggests
that the international economic system needs no fundamental reform and
shifts the locus of responsibility towards the people and governments of
African countries. Conversely, an approach positing West–Africa–China
international relations as a key element in determining a disparity of
wealth distribution among these regions necessarily suggests a revisiting
of international rules—something that has been claimed in international
development circles since the 1970s at least.

STRUCTURE AND SOURCES


Chapter 1 offers some anecdotal evidence on official development assis-
tance (ODA) which invites scrutiny on its inconsistencies and questions
whether Western aid—and the broader politico-economic cooperation
framework it is embedded in—is really assisting Africa in achieving sus-
tainable economic growth. Following an unsuccessful hunt for consistent
answers in the academic literature (Chap. 2), the quest moves into the
history of political praxes in OECD countries and Newly Industrialized
Economies (NIEs) (Chap. 3), in an effort to find a common policy
denominator among graduated economies. The underpinning idea is that,
beyond the different developmental paths followed by different countries
INTRODUCTION xxvii

at different times in history, there might be a track record of public poli-


cies that have proved to work throughout history.
Chapter 4 retrieves the economic data being analysed: BoP indicators
reflecting relations between Africa–European Union, Africa–USA and
Africa–China. Data presented here integrate preliminary data provided in
Chap. 1, while introducing two variables not included in standard BoP
analysis: capital flight and migration.
Chapter 5 subsequently makes use of the “yardstick” based on success-
ful historical praxes to assess the extent, value and impact of Western poli-
cies in Africa. The analysis is historical and interpretative, while building
upon data presented in Chap. 4. The assessment starts from an analysis
of the actors involved to move towards the interests and governance sys-
tems behind these actors’ policies. In so doing, the research poses straight-
forward questions on the origin and interests behind Western policies in
Africa. Chapter 6 carries out a similar exercise with Chinese policies in
Africa.
The analysis shows that, beyond the institutional narrative on the dif-
ferences between Western and Chinese economic activities in Africa, the
two relations rest on similar policy goals and economic mechanisms. Both
the West and China entertain economic relations with Africa, mainly final-
ized at extracting raw material, accessing market outlets for their manu-
factured goods, promoting a normative environment guaranteeing high
and safe returns on their foreign direct investment (FDI), and, at times,
creating manufacturing zones relying on low-skilled local labour. It is sug-
gested that the main differences are likely determined by the strong influ-
ence of the Chinese government on its national economy, as well as by the
large number of Chinese nationals migrating to Africa and aligning their
personal interests with the African quest for more industrialized, value-
adding and self-relying local economies.
Some words of caution should be expressed on the sources of the book.
This work accesses multiple sources—including government and interna-
tional organizations’ public and non-public primary sources, official data-
sets, and academic literature. Most statistics are updated to 2011, with
only spot updates in 2013 and 2016; although development in China-
Africa relations has happened at breakneck speed, the core arguments of
the book are built upon the structural economic relations that China (and
the West) have built and continue building with Africa, over the medium
to long term. There are no explanations of yearly variations in BoP pay-
ments exchanges or even short-term trends, as these do not contribute in
xxviii INTRODUCTION

explaining the structural features defining West–Africa and China–Africa


economic relations. China and Africa will likely continue expanding their
trade, investment and migratory ties in the years to come, till eventually
levelling off. Such trends will unlikely entail fundamental changes in the
structure of the relationship, which is, by and large, shaped by the mid-
to long-term features of the involved actors, including their respective
economies, demographics, capital and technology stocks.
The primary sources accessed during the research were in English,
French, Spanish, Portuguese or Italian—not Chinese, as relevant Chinese
scholarship has only been accessed in English. Similarly, references made
to Chinese government positions throughout the book are either coming
from secondary sources or were picked from the information that Chinese
government sources—including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the
Ministry of Commerce—have selectively made available in English. It
should also be acknowledged that, contrary to Western governmental
sources, the author did not have preferential access to Chinese govern-
mental analyses or reports.
The absence of primary Chinese sources contributes to difficulties
in verifying their authenticity. While Western official sources are mostly
embedded in a network of multilateral institutions and independent
observers offering expert checks and solid counter-factual information,7
Chinese data are, by and large, insulated from international scrutiny.
Beijing is highly secretive about its economic policies and has gained a
reputation for inflating figures on its international economic ventures,
particularly in Africa—yet, international observers are often incapable of
agreeing on alternative and more realistic figures. Consequently, the use
of averages resulting from multiple sources—a technique often used in the
book—cannot fully shoulder the principal risk of having different primary
sources “cookedup” by Chinese authorities.8

NOTES
1. According to the source of data, different group of states from the
European Union and USA (e.g. the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development [OECD] group of countries)
might be used as a proxy for the concept of “West”. This is explic-
itly indicated in the text.
2. Thomas Malthus writing to David Ricardo on 26 January, 1817
(Landes 1998, p. 1).
INTRODUCTION xxix

3. The concept of “Africa” has generally been operationalized in the


book as the fifty-four countries pertaining to the African Union
plus Morocco, “West” as the European Union plus the USA, and
China as the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Different opera-
tionalizations of these concepts have sometimes been used and
made explicit in the text.
4. For example, by underlying the importance of the nature of inter-
national trade in each country’s capacity to produce and retain
wealth, the study suggests that significant variations among
African/G90 countries’ gross domestic products (GDPs) can be
explained not only by the fact that some countries have peacefully
and effectively managed to exploit and trade in their natural
resources, but also by the fact that some of these countries have
managed to do it while overcoming typical investment rules and
trading conditions offered by OECD countries.
5. One reason for this is that even the most rigorous quantitative
studies on the impact of international economic variables, such as
Official Development Aid (ODA) or foreign direct investment
(FDI), upon national economies need accepting very restrictive
assumptions and/or clear-cut frameworks, limiting their explana-
tory scope to specific time periods or geographical regions.
Concerning ODA, these limitations are discussed in more depth in
Chaps. 2 and 4.
6. The term “praxis” is often defined in philosophy as thoughtful
practice or practice that is informed, purposeful and deliberate,
thus representing, in simplified terms, the sum of theory and prac-
tice. Karl Marx suggested that the difference between bees and
architects is that bees build marvellous structures based on prac-
tice, while architects build marvellous structures based on praxis,
the difference lying in the fact that architects are involved in reflec-
tive practices, while bees behave following natural instincts: “[…]
But what distinguishes the worst architect from the best of bees is
this, that the architect raises his structure in imagination before he
erects it in reality”. Following Marx’s reasoning, architects “think”
about what they are doing and constantly re-evaluate their values,
skills, theories and knowledge as they apply them to the structure
they are building. Contrary to “practice”, “praxis” also draws from
the repertoire of past experiences, in order to understand situations
and develop new possibilities for action. Because of their highly
xxx INTRODUCTION

reflective and thoughtful nature, political and economic actions are


referred to as “praxes” rather than “practices”.
7. With important limitations: as a matter of example, in January
2012, the government of Greece was condemned by the European
Commission for falsifying data about its public finances and allow-
ing political pressures to obstruct the collection of accurate statis-
tics (Barber 2010).
8. It should, however, be noted that any data fabrication on the
Chinese side is more likely to strengthen some of the analyses con-
tained in the book: while the Chinese rhetoric on its engagement
with Africa has been moulded on a revolutionary “win-win” con-
cept (diversified trade; high FDI in non-commodity sectors; avail-
ability to leave value-adding activities in Africa; balanced migratory
patterns, etc.), analyses contained here suggest that the interests
and mechanisms underpinning Chinese economic ventures in
Africa do not differ substantially from those underpinning Western
economic ventures.
9. Access to non-public (confidential, restricted or unclassified) docu-
ments was organized in the respect of my employers’ policies, stan-
dards and guidelines on information sensitivity, classification and
handling of information.
10. Lecture by Ashraf Ghani, Chatham House, 4 December 2014.

REFERENCES
Barber, T. (2010). Greece condemned for falsifying data. Financial Times.
Landes, D. S. (1998). The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so
rich and some so poor (1st ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics (1st ed.). New York:
Addison-Wesley.
CHAPTER 1

A Practitioner’s Perspective
on Development Aid

1 OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE TO AFRICA


“We made it”.1 A colleague from the “finance and contract section” of
the European Union (EU) Delegation to South Africa was riding joyfully
through the corridors of our political unit, sharing with us his profes-
sional contentment at having met yet another budgetary deadline: few
extra-million euros had been successfully disbursed that morning. The
payment in case did not relate to any of the Delegation’s internal expenses
or external activities; it related, instead, to a transfer of funds from the EU
Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) to the South African gov-
ernment. Such operations are technically called “direct budget support”
and have become common currency in the world of development aid; they
consist in net transfers of cash from a governmental body (the European
Union in this case) towards another governmental body (South African
government in this case), usually against a more or less tight promise on
how they will be used. They are not exactly peanuts—at least according to
the laymen’s understanding of money: in the EU–South Africa case, they
represented the large bulk of a 980 million euros financial commitment
made by Brussels over the 2008–2013 period for that country only.
The heavy red tape that entangles every tranche of these payments
and the close sequence of disbursement deadlines certainly justified my
colleague’s euphoria. And yet, something pointed at an anthropological
quiz I was not fully able to grasp. In which other real-life situation had I
witnessed someone cheering at having managed to siphon off a few million

© The Author(s) 2016 1


S. Raudino, Development Aid and Sustainable Economic Growth in
Africa, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-38936-3_1
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
CHAP. XXVII.

Moreover, neither is it sufficient to assert, “that nature, art, and


the sympathy of things in the universe, as if they were the parts of
one animal, contain premanifestations of certain things with
reference to each other; nor that bodies are so prepared, that there
is a presignification of some by others.” For these things, which are
very clearly seen, exhibit a certain divulsed vestige of divine
prediction, in a greater or less degree; since it is not possible for any
thing to be perfectly destitute of divine divination. But as in all things
the image of good exhibits a similitude of divinity; thus, likewise, in
all things a certain obscure or more manifest image of divine
prediction shines forth to the view. Nevertheless, no one of these is
such as the divine species of divination; nor must the one, divine,
and unmingled form of it be characterized from the many phantasms
which proceed from it into generation. Nor, if there are certain other
false and deceitful resemblances, which are still more remote from
reality, is it fit to adduce these in forming a judgment of it. But the
divine form or species of divination is to be apprehended according
to one intelligible and immutable truth; and the mutation which
subsists differently at different times is to be rejected as unstable and
unadapted to the Gods. If, therefore, that which is truly divination is
a thing of this kind, i. e. is a divine work, who would not blush to
ascribe it to nature, which produces its effects without reason and
intellect, as if nature elaborated in us a certain prophetic apparatus,
and inserted this aptitude in some things in a greater but in others in
a less degree? For in those things in which men receive auxiliaries
from nature in the attainment of their proper perfection, in these,
also, certain aptitudes of nature precede; but in things in which no
human work is proposed [to be effected], in these neither does the
end pertain to us. And when a certain good, which is more ancient
than our nature, has a prior arrangement, it is not possible in this
case that a certain natural excellence should become the prepared
subject of it. For in those things of which there are perfections, in
these imperfect preparations are ingenerated; but both these are the
habits of men [and not of Gods]. Hence, of those things which are
not present with us, so far as we are men, there will not be a
preparative from nature. There is not, therefore, a natural seed in us
of divine prediction. If some one, however, should in a more general
way assert, that there is a certain human divination, of this there will
be a certain physical preparation. But with respect to that which may
be truly denominated divination, and which pertains to the Gods, it
is not proper to think that this is ingrafted by nature. For both other
things, and also the indefinite, according to the more and the less,
are the attendants on this. Hence it is separated from divine
divination, which abides in stable boundaries. On this account, also,
it is requisite strenuously to contend against him who asserts that
divination originates from us. You likewise adduce clear indications
of this from the works performed in predicting what is future. For
you say, “that those who invoke [the divinities for the purposes of
divination] have about them stones and herbs, bind certain sacred
bonds, which they also dissolve, open places that are shut, and
change the deliberate intentions of the recipients, so as to render
them worthy, though they were before depraved.” All these
particulars, therefore, signify that the inspiration accedes externally.
It is requisite, however, not only to preassume this, but also to define
what the inspiration of divine origin is, which produces divine
divination. For if this is not done, we shall not previously know what
its peculiarity is, in consequence of not attributing to it its proper
character, and adapting this to it as a certain seal. And this, indeed,
has been accurately done by us a little before.
CHAP. XXVIII.

You adduce, however, as a thing by no means to be despised, “the


artificers of efficacious images.” But I should wonder if these were
admitted by any one of the theurgists who survey the true forms of
the Gods. For why should any one exchange truly existing beings for
images, and descend from the first to the last of things? Or do we not
know that all things effected by an adumbration of this kind, have an
obscure subsistence, are the phantasms only of that which is true,
and appear to be good, but in no respect are so? Other things, also, of
this kind that accede, are borne along in a flowing condition of being;
but obtain nothing genuine, or perfect, or manifest. But this is
evident from the mode of their production: for not divinity, but man
is the maker of them. Nor are they produced from uniform and
intelligible essences, but from matter, which is assumed for this
purpose. What good, therefore, can germinate from matter, and from
the material and corporeal-formed powers which are in bodies? Or is
not that which derives its subsistence from human art, more imbecile
than men themselves, who impart existence to it? By what kind of
art, likewise, is this image fashioned? For it is said, indeed, to be
fashioned by demiurgic art; but this is effective of true essences, and
not of certain images. Hence the image-producing art is distant by a
great interval from the seminal production of realities. Besides,
neither does it preserve a certain analogy with divine fabrication. For
divinity does not fabricate all things, either through the celestial
physical motions, or through a partial matter, or through powers
thus divided; but he produces the worlds by conceptions, will, and
immaterial forms, and through an eternal and supermundane soul.
The maker of images, however, is said to elaborate them through the
revolving stars. But the thing does not in reality subsist so as it
appears to do. For since there are certain infinite powers in the
celestial Gods, the last genus of all the powers in them is physical.
But again, of this power one portion being inherent in spermatic
reasons [or productive powers], and prior to these reasons being
established in immoveable natures, essentially precedes generation.
But another portion being inherent in sensible and visible motions
and powers, and in celestial effluxions and qualities, has dominion
over the whole visible order of things. This last power, therefore, in
all these rules over the circumterrestrial manifest generation in
places about the earth. Many other arts, however, as for instance, the
medical[84] and gymnastic, use this power, which has dominion over
visible generation, and the qualities of the effluxions sent from the
heavens employ it, and likewise all such arts as in their operations
communicate with nature. And moreover, the image-making art
attracts a certain very obscure genesiurgic portion from the celestial
effluxions.
Such, therefore, as the truth is, such also it is requisite to unfold it
to others. It must be said, then, that the maker of images neither uses
the celestial circulations, nor the powers which are inherent in them,
nor those powers which are naturally established about them; nor, in
short, is it possible to come into contact with them. But he
artificially, and not theurgically, applies himself to the last effluxions
which openly proceed from the nature of them, about the last part of
the universe. For these effluxions, I think, being mingled with a
partial matter, are capable of being changed and transformed
differently at different times. They likewise receive the transposition,
from some things to others, of the powers which are in partial
natures. The variety, however, of such like energies, and the
composition of a multitude of material powers, are not only entirely
separated from divine fabrication, but also from natural production.
For nature produces her proper works collectively, and at once, and
accomplishes all things by simple and incomposite energies. Hence it
remains that a commixture of this kind, about the last and manifest
celestial effluxion, and about the things which are moved by a
celestial nature, is artificial.
CHAP. XXIX.

Why, therefore, does the maker of images, who effects these


things, desert himself, though he is better than these images, and
consists of things of a more excellent nature, and confide in
inanimate idols, which are inspired with the representation alone of
life, contain a renovated harmony, and which is externally
multiform, and are in reality diurnal? Shall we say that something
genuine and true is inherent in them? Nothing, however, which is
fashioned by human art is genuine and pure. But you will say, that
simplicity and uniformity of energy predominate in the whole of
their composition. This is very far from being the case. For the idol,
according to its visible composition, is mingled from all-various and
contrary qualities. Shall we say then, that a certain pure and perfect
power is manifest in them? By no means. For a thing of this kind
possesses an adventitious multitude of effluxions, collected from
many places, and which shows itself to be imbecile and evanescent.
But if these particulars, which we have enumerated, are not found to
take place in images, is stability present with them, as it is said to be
[by the patrons of these images]? By no means, likewise, is this the
case. For these idols are extinguished with much greater rapidity
than the images which are seen in mirrors. For they are immediately
formed by the accession of fumigations from exhaling vapours; but
when the fumigation is mingled with, and diffused through, the
whole air, then the idol is likewise immediately dissolved, and is not
naturally adapted to remain for the smallest portion of time. Why,
therefore, should the man who is a lover of truth, pay attention to
these useless delusions? I, indeed, do not think them to be of any
value. For if the makers of these images know that the fictions about
which they are busily employed, are nothing more than the
formations of passive matter, the evil arising from an attention to
them will be simple. But in addition to this, these idol-makers are
similar to the images in which they confide. And if they pay attention
to these idols as if they were Gods, the absurdity will be so great, as
neither to be effable by words, nor to be endured in deeds. For a
certain divine splendour never illuminates a soul of this kind,
because it is not adapted to be imparted to things which are entirely
repugnant to it; neither have those things which are detained by dark
phantasms a place for its reception. This delusive formation,
therefore, of phantasms, will be conversant with shadows, which are
very remote from the truth.
CHAP. XXX.

You say, however, “that the makers of images observe the motion
of the celestial bodies, and can tell from the concurrence of what
star, with a certain star or stars, predictions will be true or false;
and also whether the things that are performed will be inanities, or
significant and efficacious.” But neither will these phantasms, on
this account, possess any thing divine. For the last of the things
which are in generation are moved in conjunction with the celestial
courses, and are copassive with the effluxions which descend from
the heavenly bodies. Moreover, if any one considers these things
accurately, he will find that they demonstrate the contrary to what is
here asserted. For how is it possible that things which are in every
respect mutable, and this with facility, and which are all-variously
turned by external motions, so as to become inefficacious, or
prophetic, or significant, or effective, or at different times different,
should contain in themselves, by participation, any portion, however
small, of divine power? What then, are the powers which are
inherent in matter the elements of dæmons? By no means: for no
partial sensible bodies generate dæmons; but much more are these
generated and guarded by dæmons. Neither is any man able to
fashion, as by a machine, certain forms of dæmons; but, on the
contrary, he is rather fashioned and fabricated by them, so far as he
participates of a sensible body. But neither is a certain dæmoniacal
multitude generated from the elements of sensibles; since, on the
contrary, this multitude is simple, and energizes uniformly about
composite natures. Hence, neither will it have sensibles more
ancient, or more stable than itself; but being itself more excellent
than sensibles, both in dignity and power, it imparts to them the
permanency which they are able to receive. Unless indeed, you
denominate idols dæmons, not rightly employing an appellation of
this kind. For the nature of dæmons is one thing, and that of idols
another. The order of each, likewise, is very different. Moreover, the
leader of idols is different from the great leader of dæmons. And this,
also, you admit. For you say, “that no God or dæmon is drawn down
by idols.” What, therefore, will be the worth of a sacred deed, or of
the foreknowledge of what is future, if it is entirely destitute of
divinity and a dæmon? So that it is requisite to know what the nature
is of this wonder-working art, but by no means to use or confide in it.
CHAP. XXXI.

Again, therefore, still worse than this is the explanation of sacred


operations, which assigns as the cause of divination, “a certain genus
of dæmons, which is naturally fraudulent, omniform, and various,
and which assumes the appearance of Gods and dæmons, and the
souls of the deceased.” I shall, therefore, relate to you, in answer to
this, what I once heard from the prophets of the Chaldeans.
Such Gods as are truly divinities, are alone the givers of good;
alone associate with good men, and with those that are purified by
the sacerdotal art, and from these amputate all vice, and every
passion. When these, also, impart their light, that which is evil, and
at the same time dæmoniacal, vanishes from before more excellent
natures, in the same manner as darkness when light is present; nor is
it able to disturb theurgists in the smallest degree, who receive from
this light every virtue, obtain worthy manners, become orderly and
elegant in their actions, are liberated from passions, and purified
from every disorderly motion, and from atheistical and unholy
conduct. But those who are themselves flagitious, and who leap, as it
were, to things of a divine nature in an illegal and disorderly manner,
these, through the imbecility of their proper energy, or through
indigence of inherent power, are not able to associate with the Gods.
Because, likewise, they are excluded, through certain defilements,
from an association with pure spirits, they become connected with
evil spirits, are filled from them with the worst kind of inspiration,
are rendered depraved and unholy, become replete with intemperate
pleasures, and every kind of vice, are emulous of manners foreign to
the Gods, and, in short, become similar to the depraved dæmons,
with whom they are connascent. These, therefore, being full of
passions and vice, attract to themselves, through alliance, depraved
spirits, and are excited by them to every kind of iniquity. They are
also increased in wickedness by each other, like a circle conjoining
the beginning to the end, and similarly making an equal
compensation. Hence deeds which are the nefarious offences of
impiety, which are introduced into sacred works in a disorderly
manner, and which are also confusedly performed by those who
betake themselves to such works, and at one time, as it seems, cause
one divinity to be present instead of another, and again, introduce
depraved dæmons instead of Gods, whom they call equal to the Gods
(αντιθεους)—such deeds as these you should never adduce in a
discourse concerning sacerdotal divination. For good is more
contrary to evil than to that which is not good. As, therefore, the
sacrilegious are in the most eminent degree hostile to the religious
cultivation of the Gods; thus, also, those who are conversant with
dæmons who are fraudulent, and the causes of intemperance, are
undoubtedly hostile to theurgists. For from these every depraved
spirit departs, and when they are present, is entirely subverted.
Every vice, too, and every passion, are by these perfectly amputated:
for a pure participation of good is present with the pure, and they are
supernally filled with truth from a divine fire. These, therefore, suffer
no impediment from evil spirits, nor are these spirits any obstacles to
the goods of their souls. Nor are theurgists disturbed by pride, or
flattery, or the enjoyment of exhalations, or any violence; but all
these, as if struck by lightning, yield and recede, without touching
the theurgist, or being able to approach to them. Hence this genus of
divination is undefiled and sacerdotal, and is truly divine. This, also,
does not, as you say it does, require me, or any other as an arbiter, in
order that I may prefer it to a multitude of other things; but it is itself
exempt from all things, is supernatural, and has an eternal
preexistence, neither receiving a certain opposition, nor a certain
transcendency, which has a prearrangement in many things, because
it is of itself liberated, and uniformly precedes all things. And to this
it is requisite that you, and every one who is a genuine lover of the
Gods, should give himself wholly; since by this mean irreprehensible
truth will be obtained in divinations, and perfect virtue in souls; and
through both these, an ascent will be afforded to theurgists to
intelligible fire, which ought to be preestablished as the end of all
foreknowledge, and of every theurgic operation. Hence you in vain
adduce the opinion of those who think that divination is effected by
an evil dæmon, since these do not deserve to be mentioned in
speculations concerning the Gods. At the same time, likewise, they
are ignorant of the means of distinguishing truth from falsehood,
because they are from the beginning nourished in darkness, and are
wholly incapable of knowing the principles from which these are
produced. Here, therefore, we shall terminate our discussion
concerning the mode of divination.
SECTION IV.

CHAP. I.

Let us then, in the next place, consider the opposing arguments,


what they are, and what reason they possess. And if we should
discuss some things a little more abundantly, in consequence of
speaking freely and at leisure, it is requisite that you should promptly
attend to, and endure what, we say. For it is necessary that great
labour should be bestowed on the greatest disciplines, and that they
should be accurately explored for a long time, if you intend to know
them perfectly. Do you, therefore, conformably to the present
hypothesis, propose the arguments which occasion the doubt, and I
will answer you. Say then, “it very much perplexes me to understand
how superior beings, when invoked, are commanded by those that
invoke them, as if they were their inferiors.” But I will unfold to you
the whole division, which is worthy of regard, concerning the powers
that are invoked; from which you will be able clearly to define what is
possible and what is impossible, in the subjects of your investigation.
For the Gods, indeed, and the natures that are more excellent than
we, through the wish of what is beautiful, and from an unenvying
and exuberant fulness of good, benevolently impart to those that are
worthy, such things as are fit for them, commiserating the labours of
sacerdotal men, but being delighted with those that they have
begotten, nourished, and instructed. But the middle genera are the
inspective guardians of judgment. These inform us what ought to be
done, and from what it is fit to abstain. They also give assistance to
just works, but impede such as are unjust; and as many endeavour to
take away unjustly the property of others, or basely to injure or
destroy some one, they cause these to suffer the same things as they
have done to others. But there is, likewise, another most irrational
genus of dæmons,[85] which is without judgment, and is allotted only
one power, through an arrangement by which each of these dæmons
presides over one work alone. As therefore, it is the province of a
sword to cut, and to do nothing else than this, thus also of the spirits
which are distributed in the universe, according to the partible
necessity of nature, one kind divides, but another collects, things
which are generated. This, however, is known from the phænomena.
For the Charonean[86] spiracles, as they are called, emit from
themselves a certain spirit, which is able to corrupt promiscuously
every thing that falls into them. Thus, therefore, of certain invisible
spirits, each is allotted a different power, and is alone adapted to do
that which it is ordained to perform. He, therefore, who turns from
their natural course things which contribute to the universe in an
orderly manner, and illegitimately performs a certain thing, in this
case receives the injury arising from that which he uses badly. This,
however, pertains to another mode of discussion.
CHAP. II.

But we sometimes see that take place which is now proposed to be


considered. For it happens that spirits are commanded [to do this or
that] who do not use a reason of their own, and have not the
principle of judgment. Nor does this occur irrationally. For our
dianoia naturally possessing the power of reasoning about and
judging of things as they are, and comprehending in itself many
powers of life, is accustomed to command the most irrational spirits,
and such as derive their perfection from one energy alone. Hence, it
invokes these as more excellent natures, because it endeavours to
attract to particulars from the whole world, in which we are
contained, things which contribute to wholes.[87] And it commands
them as inferior natures, because frequently certain parts of things in
the world [such as our reasoning power] are more pure and perfect
than things which extend themselves to the whole world. Thus, for
instance, if one thing is intellectual [as is the case with our dianoia],
but another is wholly inanimate or physical, then that which
proceeds to a less extent has a more principal power than that which
is more extended, though the former falls far short of the latter in
magnitude and multitude of domination. For these things, also,
another reason may be assigned, and which is as follows: in all
theurgical operations the priest sustains a twofold character; one,
indeed, as man, and which preserves the order possessed by our
nature in the universe; but the other, which is corroborated by divine
signs, and through these is conjoined to more excellent natures, and
is elevated to their order by an elegant circumduction, this is
deservedly capable of being surrounded with the external form of the
Gods. Conformably, therefore, to a difference of this kind, the priest
very properly invokes, as more excellent natures, the powers derived
from the universe, so far as he who invokes is a man; and again, he
commands these powers, because through arcane symbols, he, in a
certain respect, is invested with the sacred form of the Gods.
CHAP. III.

Dissolving, however, the doubts in a way still more true, we think


it requisite, in invoking superior natures, to take away the evocations
which appear to be directed to them as to men, and also the
mandates in the performance of works, which are given with great
earnestness. For if the communion of concordant friendship, and a
certain indissoluble connexion of union, are the bonds of sacerdotal
operations, in order that these operations may be truly divine, and
may transcend every common action known to men, no human work
will be adapted to them; nor will the invocations of the priest
resemble the manner in which we draw to ourselves things that are
distant; nor are his mandates directed as to things separated from
him, in the way in which we transfer one thing from others. But the
energy of divine fire shines forth voluntarily, and in common, and
being self-invoked and self-energetic, energizes through all things
with invariable sameness, both through the natures which impart,
and those that are able to receive, its light. This mode of solution,
therefore, is far superior, which does not suppose that divine works
are effected through contrariety, or discrepance, in the way in which
generated natures are usually produced; but asserts that every such
work is rightly accomplished through sameness, union, and consent.
Hence, if we separate from each other that which invokes and that
which is invoked, that which commands and that which is
commanded, that which is more and that which is less excellent, we
shall, in a certain respect, transfer the contrariety of generations to
the unbegotten goods of the Gods. But if we despise all such things,
as it is just we should, as of an earth-born nature, and ascribe that
which is common and simple, as being more honourable, to the
powers who transcend the variety which is in the realms of
generation, the first hypothesis of these questions will be
immediately subverted, so that no reasonable doubt concerning
them will be left.
CHAP. IV.

What then shall we say concerning the next inquiry to this, viz.
“why the powers who are invoked think it requisite that he who
worships them should be just, but they when called upon to act
unjustly do not refuse so to act?” To this I reply, that I am dubious
with respect to what you call acting justly, and am of opinion that
what appears to us to be an accurate definition of justice does not
also appear to be so to the Gods. For we, looking to that which is
most brief, direct our attention to things present, and to this
momentary life, and the manner in which it subsists. But the powers
that are superior to us know the whole life of the soul, and all its
former lives; and, in consequence of this, if they inflict a certain
punishment from the prayer of those that invoke them, they do not
inflict it without justice, but looking to the offences committed by
souls in former lives;[88] which men not perceiving think that they
unjustly fall into the calamities which they suffer.
CHAP. V.

The multitude, also, are accustomed to doubt in common the very


same thing concerning providence, viz. why certain persons are
afflicted undeservedly, as they have not done any thing unjustly prior
to their being thus afflicted. For neither here is it possible to
understand [perfectly] what the soul is, and its whole life, how many
offences it has committed in former lives, and whether it now suffers
from its former guilt. In this life, also, many unjust actions are
concealed from human knowledge, but are known to the Gods, since
neither is the same scope of justice proposed to them as to men. For
men, indeed, define justice to be the soul’s performance of its own
proper business,[89] and the distribution of desert, conformably to the
established laws, and the prevailing polity. But the Gods, looking to
the whole orderly arrangement of the world, and to the subserviency
of souls to the Gods, form a judgment of what is just. Hence the
judgment of just actions with the Gods is different from what it is
with us. Nor is it wonderful, if we are unable, in most things, to
arrive at the supreme and most perfect judgment of more excellent
natures. What also hinders, but that to each thing by itself, and in
conjunction with the whole alliance of souls, justice may in a very
transcendent manner be decreed by the Gods? For if a communion of
the same nature in souls, both when they are in and when they are
out of bodies, produces a certain identical connexion and common
order with the life of the world, it is likewise necessary that, a
fulfilment of justice should be required by wholes, and especially
when the magnitude of the unjust deeds antecedently committed by
one soul transcends the infliction of one punishment due to the
offences. But if any one should add other definitions, through which
he can show that what is just subsists with the Gods in a way
different from that in which it is known by us, from these also our
design will be facilitated. For me, however, the beforementioned
canons are alone sufficient for the purpose of manifesting the
universal genus, and which comprehends every thing pertaining to
the medicinal punishments inflicted by divine justice.
CHAP. VI.

In order, therefore, that from an abundance of arguments we may


contend against the objection which is now adduced, we will grant, if
you please, the contrary to what we have asserted, viz. that certain
unjust things are performed in this business of invocations. That the
Gods, however, are not to be accused as the causes of these is
immediately manifest. For those that are good are the causes of
good; and the Gods possess good essentially. They do nothing,
therefore, that is unjust. Hence other causes of guilty deeds must be
investigated. And if we are not able to discover these causes, it is not
proper to throw away the true conception respecting the Gods, nor
on account of the doubts whether these unjust deeds are performed,
and how they are effected, to depart from notions concerning the
Gods which are truly clear. For it is much better to acknowledge the
insufficiency of our power to explain how unjust actions are
perpetrated, than to admit any thing impossible and false respecting
the Gods; since all the Greeks and Barbarians truly opine the
contrary to be the case with divine natures. After this manner,
therefore, the truth respecting these particulars subsists.
CHAP. VII.

Moreover, it is necessary to add the causes whence evils[90]


sometimes arise, and to show how many and of what kind they are.
For the form of them is not simple; but, being various, is the leader
of the generation of various evils. For if what we a little before said,
concerning images and evil dæmons, who assume the appearance of
Gods and good dæmons, is true, an abundant evil-producing tribe,
about which a contrariety of this kind usually happens, will from
hence appear to flow. For an evil dæmon requires that his
worshipper should be just, because he assumes the appearance of
one belonging to the divine genus; but he is subservient to what is
unjust, because he is depraved. The same thing, likewise, that is said
of good and evil may be asserted of the true and the false. As,
therefore, in divinations we attribute true predictions to the Gods
alone, but when we detect any falsehood in predictions we refer this
to another genus of cause, viz. that of dæmons; thus, also, in things
just and unjust, the beautiful and the just are to be alone ascribed to
Gods and good dæmons; but such dæmons as are naturally
depraved, perpetrate what is unjust and base. And that, indeed,
which consents and accords with itself, and always subsists with
invariable sameness, pertains to more excellent natures; but that
which is hostile to itself, which is discordant, and never the same, is
the peculiarity in the most eminent degree of dæmoniacal
dissension, about which it is not at all wonderful that things of an
opposing nature should subsist; but perhaps the very contrary, that
this should not be the case, would be more wonderful.
CHAP. VIII.

We may, however, beginning from another hypothesis,


demonstrate the same thing. We must admit that the corporeal parts
of the universe are neither sluggish nor destitute of power, but as
much as they excel our concerns in perfection, beauty, and
magnitude, by so much also is the power which is present with them
greater. Each, likewise, by itself is capable of effecting different
things, and produces certain different energies. They are also capable
of effecting things much more numerous on each other. And besides
this, a certain multiform production extends to parts from wholes;
partly from sympathy, through similitude of powers, and partly from
the aptitude of the agent to the patient. If, therefore, certain evils and
destructions happen to parts, they are salutary and good as with
reference to wholes and the harmony of the universe, but to parts
they introduce a necessary corruption, either from not being able to
bear the energies of wholes, or from a certain other commixture and
temperament of their own imbecility, or, in the third place, from the
privation of symmetry in the parts to each other.
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade

Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and


personal growth!

[Link]

You might also like