UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

UNITED STATES FACETERS GUILD

NEWSLETTER

1
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

.................................................................................................................3
...............................................................................................................4
......................................................................................................6
..............................................................................................................................9
.........................................................................................................................................12
............................................................................................................................21
......................................................................................22
...............................................................................................................25
.................................................................................................................30
.............................................................................31
............................................................................................................................40
.......................................................................41
.............................................................................46
..............................................................................................................53
........................................60
.....................62
............................................................................................................................72
...........................................................................................................................................73
.....................................................................................................74
....................................................................................................................74
.........................................................................................75

2
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

USFG welcomes all new members!

John Adams TX Don Monsees NC

John W. Ake WY Michael Power OR
Jon Barendse MI Erin Rudowski NJ
Brenda Barteck MD Ed Schwarz UT
Cameron Dean TN Chales Shupe CA
Michael Dobbs OK John Sullivan NC
Conny Egan FL Edward Smith NY
Roger Crickenberger NC Heather Sutton OR
Jay Gorday GA Richard Vogl CA
Pat Gourlay SC Eudora Wilson MD
Robert Hammond NC Stewart Wilson OR
Dan Henderson FL Theodore Wilson TX
Joe Henley CA Dave Woolley VA
Gary Herauf ID Wyatt Yeager CA
Timothy Hoff MT Michael Zappe CO
Randy Jacobson CA
Richard Lavinghouse CA
Bob Lawrence OH WELCOME BACK!
John Lichtenberger KY Roy Kersey TN
Susan McCauley NY John Kilian AZ
Bruce Mock PA David Renneckar OH
Susan Moner OR

3
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Tom Maxwell
The year is rapidly passing by and we work he put in to this project for the
have accomplished much and much benefit of the USFG.
remains to be done.
We have engaged the services of Scott
The 2016 Single Stone Competition saw a McIntire of Lost Dog Graphics to be the
large number of entries and qualifying USFG Webmaster and do some tidying
scores. The results are listed elsewhere in up of the existing site. You should see
this newsletter. Congratulations to all that some improvements in the speed and
entered, whether you qualified or not. I’m fewer if any broken links. There is a link
sure will agree that this is a good learning at the top of each web page that you can
experience. Special congratulations to Jim use to report a problem.
Clark for winning the Grand Master
Division! Jenny Clark is now Secretary of the
USFG in addition to continuing as
2017 SSC Selection Committee will Membership Chair. The large increase in
begin selecting stones for the 2017 SSC. both new members and renewals requires
The designs and rules will be posted on a lot of her time. Thanks Jenny!
the website along with an email
notifications to all members Getting Involved- Melissa Smith has
agreed to be Volunteer Coordinator. If
This Mark Oros’s last Newsletter as you have any skills that you would like to
Editor. Dan Lynch has agreed to become offer the USFG, contact her at
the Editor and will work with Mark on the info@[Link]. If you would
transition to the December Newsletter. like to help but are not sure what you
Mark has done an outstanding job in the would like to do, send your name to
past year. We appreciate Mark’s hard Melissa. We will find some area that you
work and other contributions to the USFG will be able contribute to your
and wish him well as he moves on to organization.
other endeavors.
FFF9 was another successful event thanks
Robert Asmundi OF RKA Studio has to the efforts of Ken Michalek and Norm
completed the major redesign and Holbert. See Ken’s report elsewhere in
upgrade of the USFG website which has this newsletter. Rennie Castelino just
increased our presence and helped to wrapped up the third event this year in the
expand our membership greatly. I want to San Francisco Bay Area. Loyd
thank Robert for l the extra time and hard Blankenship
[Link]@[Link] is trying to
4
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

develop interest in an event this spring in Coordinator Melissa Smith at

Pawtucket RI. info@[Link]. She will
compile a list for the organizer of each
The Third USFG Tucson Frolic will be event.
February 2, 3 and 4 at the Old Pueblo
Lapidary Club. We will have GemCad This is your organization. Get involved
Classes, Faceting Classes Tours of and help expand the hobby and craft that
Tucson Rough dealers. Speakers and we all love.
Programs will be posted on the website
soon. Tom Maxwell
President - USFG
Helpers are always needed at these
events. Please contact our new Volunteer

5
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

The 2016 USFG Single Stone competition results are in. The judges have ruled on the 4
classes of stone, Novice, Pre-master, master, and Grand Master. We had quite a few
entries (55 total) comprised of 32 Novice, 14 Pre-Master, 5 Master, and 4 Grand Master.

The following tables list the details for each class as to those who certified and the top
scores and winners in each category

Winners in the Novice Classification:

Name Location Status Rank Score

Michael Noetzel Nashua, NH certified 1 99.78
Christopher Bork San Clemente, certified 2 99.57
CA
Imaizumi Fumio Kyoto, Japan certified 3 99.35

Novice entries qualifying for certification:

Name Location Status Score

Theordore Wilson Wylie, TX certified 98.27
Kenneth Befus Robinson, TX certified 97.62
Ron Davis Council Bluff, certified 97.6161
Iowa
Dan Henderson Sun City Ctr, certified 97.4
FL
Marek Mikolaj Kosice, Slovakia certified 97.3994
Gerald Smoot Kennewick, Wa certified 96.53
Diana Skye Maple Valley, certified 96.32
WA
Carl Shearer Maple Ridge, certified 95.8824
B.C
Michael Power Medford, OR certified 95.23
Loyd Blankenship East Providence, certified 95.23
RI
Jack Spinks Midlothian, TX certified 95.02
Tim Vieyra Clarksville, TN certified 95.02
David Juckem Neenah, WI certified 94.3654
Owen McDevitt Butte, MT certified 93.5
6
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Lionell Bailey Genas France certified 93.0651

Gerald Boykin Etowah, N.C certified 91.9815
Phillip Woods Barton MD certified 91.98
Carmina Orilla Anaheim, CA certified 91.3313
Matthew Castor Cocoa, FL certified 91.33
Casey Trump Grand Junction, certified 90.031
CO
Corey Brenner Post Falls, ID certified 90.031
Edwin Gessele Anaconda, MT certified 89.82
Edward Smith Wolcott NY certified 88.0806

Participants: Scott Kelley, Allan Jacques, Gjeret Stein, Rick Brooker, Gary Hirt

Winners in the Pre-Master Classification:

Name Location Status Rank Score

Pavel Filinov Moscow Russia certified 1 99.813
Frank Woodward Queensland, AU certified 2 97.97
Steve Page Brea CA certified 3 96.6781

Pre-Master entries qualifying for certification:

Name Location Status Score

Bruce Argall Greensburg, PA certified 91.3262

Participants: Timothy Kaufman, William Parent, Jerry Hill, Susan Lichtenberger, Kevin
Ellis, Rita Phagan, Diane Eames, Frank Toth, Greg Stimpson, Don Sabie

Winners in the Master Classification:

Name Location Status Rank Score

Alexander Naryshkin St Petersburg, certified 1 100
RU
Clara Ventor Usakos, Namibia certified 2 97.9872
Richard Moriyama Niceville, FL certified 3 95.2425

Participants: Carl Davis, Jeff Theesfold

7
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Winners in the Grand Master Classification:

Name Location Status Rank Score

James Clark Mesa, AZ certified 1 98.0641

Grand Master entries qualifying for certification:

Name Location Status Score

Charles Lundstrom Tucson, AZ certified 96.8322

Participants: Homer Barrs, Denny Bradley

Every year there are changes to the competition, including where to mail your stone.
Please be sure to read the details when next years stones are published. This is usually in
the December newsletter.

8
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Wayne Barnett
and when a faceting machine was offered
I began faceting about 1975. I took for sale from an estate I purchased it. It
lessons at an adult education program in was an Ultratec. After sending it to the
Modesto, California. The person running factory to be recalibrated I began faceting
the lapidary program at the time believed on a regular basis. With each stone I self-
that at least one year should be dedicated evaluated and began to cut each stone
to cutting cabochons; I cut a lot of cabs so better than the last. I continued to be a
I could get a position on a faceter. They member of the faceting section and when
had Taylors for the class - probably about my friend and his wife had to withdraw
as good a machine that could be had at the from regular activities in the section, I
time. During this initial time of faceting I took over as section chairman. I served as
probably completed 25 to 30 stones at section chairman for several years then
most. Most were put into jewelry for became section treasurer for several years
family except my first stone, which was until I knew we were going to move to
cut from rose quartz. It was rather sleepy Oregon in 2012. In addition to being chair
so it did not have the bling that the ladies of the HGMS faceting section I have also
like. I still have that stone. been president of the Texas Faceting
Guild. This was a one of those decisions
During the hiatus in faceting between where I let my ego get the best of my
1976 and about 1994, I went back to better sense.
school and earned my bachelors and
masters in geology. I moved to Houston While a member of HGMS I became one
Texas and took a job as a geophysicist. In of the faceting instructors. This gave me
about 1992 I joined the Houston Gem and plenty of opportunity to further my
Mineral Society (HGMS). For a while I education as a faceter. It is said if one
cut cabs and joined the Paleontology wants to really learn a subject then try to
section. As a result of my geology studies teach it. Well I believe that is true. I
I became interested in fossils. A friend at learned a lot by teaching my fellow
one of the companies that worked also members how to cut stones. As well as
belonged to HGMS and also raised bees having regular classes I organized several
for the honey. One weekend I was helping seminars on faceting where we would
him rob the bees and his wife invited us to discuss any topic that the audience
attend their annual Christmas party for the desired. These were usually held on a
HGMS faceting section. weekend afternoon and members could
bring their machines or not. It was a great
As it turned out not long after I began way to exchange information. Because I
attending the faceting section meetings did not believe that the books that were
9
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

readily available at the time were well killers. Since then I have gotten back to
suited to instruct a beginner how to facet I my machine and as part of my recovery
developed my own guide on how to get time I was able to get back cutting.
started in faceting. Presently I am Presently I am assisting the faceting
working on the third generation of that instructor at the local rock club (Rogue
guide. Gem and Geology Club) as he needs
assistance.
During the time in Houston I became
proficient enough to cut just about any Looking over the stones that I have in my
stone I set my mind to. I took on repairing collection I have cut many varieties from
stones for jewelers in the Houston area A to Z. I prefer to cut topaz. Cuts easy but
and began cutting for a jeweler who many times a bear to polish. As many
specialized in Texas stones. One of the cutters, I suppose, I also cut a lot of
biggest challenges was to cut replacement quartz. Many colors and relatively easy to
stones for lost stones in jewelry. Usually obtain. While I cut the smaller stones,
these were small sapphires so the biggest mainly Montana sapphires, I prefer to cut
challenge was getting them to fit properly stones that give at least 2+ carats. The
in the original setting. Many times the largest stone I have cut is a version of the
owner of the jewelry did not want to let Hunky Dory design in quartz. It came in
me take the piece so a proper fit could be at 208 carats and over 48 mm. While I cut
made at the offset. Many times, no stones for others in the sizes they want the
manner how well the measurements are stones I cut for myself are where my
made, the stone just was not right. whim take me at the time. If I have a large
piece of rough it is hard for me to cut it up
Repairing stones that had been well loved so a bunch of little stones can be cut. I
also proved to be a real challenge at made that mistake once, hopefully I will
times. I have dealt with faceted stones not have to do that again.
that have been so worn that the crown had
no discernable facets left. You just begin As for the gem designs I sent, I reviewed
recutting the best way possible and hope my copies and found that I had put notes
for the best. So far I have been lucky. in the bottom of each. All have been test
cut. The SRB was just modified from the
In 2012 we moved to Grants Pass, standard SRB to fit the needs of a shallow
Oregon. I continued cutting until we sapphire. Useful if you do not have
began to build our house. Once the house GemCad to make the modifications. As
was finished I managed to break my leg noted the Kite pattern was made for a
just above the ankle. Because of the friend based on a stone in a ring of his
severity of the fracture the surgeon had wife’s. I only had a picture of the stone
me on my back for over three months, from the top so did not really know what
most of the time on heavy duty pain the pavilion looked like. Just made an
10
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

outline and began cutting to make things a stone than to spend hours searching to
meet as they should. The small sapphire see if there is something already out there.
was an original design. I will not say that Will get into the philosophy of all that
it is not somewhere else, just that I did not later if you wish.
look at all the sources just to see if one
existed. Sometimes it is easier to ‘design’

11
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

The designs for the September USFG Newsletter were selected by USFG member Glenn
Wood. Thank you Glenn!

48
54 42

60 36

66 30

72 H 24 U W

7 6
78 F 18
G
D E 1
84 C 12
A B 5 4
90 6 2
<96> 3
Interminable Interregnum
by Jay Conner, 2015
Angles for R.I. = 2.020
T 89 + 12 girdles = 101 facets
C
4-fold, mirror-image symmetry
C B
A 96 index
4
5 L/W = 1.000 T/W = 0.499 U/W = 0.499
1
P/W = 0.514 C/W = 0.147
P Vol./W³ = 0.268
6 7

PAVILION CROWN
1 43.04° 04-08-16-20- Cut to centerpoint A 40.46° 06-18-30-42- Set girdle
28-32-40-44- 54-66-78-90
52-56-64-68- B 46.09° 96-24-48-72 Meet A
76-80-88-92 C 32.49° 04-20-28-44- Meet A and B
2 90.00° 06-18-30-42- Set width 52-68-76-92
54-66-78-90 D 26.60° 09-15-33-39- Meet A and C
3 90.00° 96-24-48-72 Meet 1 and 2 57-63-81-87
4 61.06° 06-18-30-42- Set girdle E 20.60° 96-24-48-72 Meet B
54-66-78-90 F 16.78° 12-36-60-84 Meet E and C
5 62.94° 96-24-48-72 Meet 1 and 4 G 13.45° 09-15-33-39- Meet C
6 41.00° 96-12-24-36- Meet 5 57-63-81-87
48-60-72-84 H 0.00° Table Meet F
7 40.98° 06-18-30-42- Meet culet
54-66-78-90

Permission to use this design is granted by the author without restriction.

C:\Users\eng\Documents\[Link]

12
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

48
56 40

64 32

72 F 24 U W

5 4

E D
80 16
C B 1
A 2
88 8 3
<96>
Blue Hour
Suite: Natural Wonders
By Willie Klaja
C T Angles for R.I. = 1.540
A 73 + 6 girdles = 79 facets
3 6-fold, mirror-image symmetry
2
1 96 index
P L/W = 1.155 T/W = 0.551 U/W = 0.550
4 5 P/W = 0.520 C/W = 0.138
Vol./W³ = 0.286
L

PAVILION
1 44.50° 03-13-19-29-35-45- Make temporary centerpoint
51-61-67-77-83-93
3 90.00° 96-16-32-48-64-80 Determine size
2 70.00° 96-16-32-48-64-80 Make level girdle
4 42.00° 08-24-40-56-72-88 Meet girdle
5 42.82° 96-16-32-48-64-80 Meet 2
CROWN
A 45.00° 96-16-32-48-64-80 Level girdle
B 25.00° 07-09-23-25-39-41- Meet girdle
55-57-71-73-87-89
C 24.64° 03-13-19-29-35-45- Meet centerpoint
51-61-67-77-83-93
D 24.61° 08-24-40-56-72-88 Meet girdle
E 22.00° 96-16-32-48-64-80 Meet A
F 0.00° Table Meet C & B

A design suitable for quartz to cubic zirconia.

Suggested size is 10 - 25 mm.
Medium colours may be best -- should cut a fairly bright design.
C:\Users\TTWOOD\Documents\GemCad Designs\Blue [Link]

13
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

40 32 24

48 T 16 U W

3
3
2
2 1 1

56 <64> 8 G2
G1
PC 15.102 Dan's Cushy
by Dan Mooney & Walt Heitland
Meet Points, Feb. 2003
C T
Angles for R.I. = 1.610
41 + 12 girdles = 53 facets
1
4-fold, mirror-image symmetry
2 64 index
P L/W = 1.000 T/W = 0.633 U/W = 0.633
3
P/W = 0.456 C/W = 0.099
Vol./W³ = 0.200
L

PAVILION
G1 90.00° 64-16-32-48
G2 90.00° 03-13-19-29-
35-45-51-61
1 44.00° 03-13-19-29-
35-45-51-61
2 43.69° 64-16-32-48
3 41.00° 04-12-20-28-
36-44-52-60
CROWN
1 28.90° 03-13-19-29-
35-45-51-61
2 28.25° 64-16-32-48
3 25.50° 04-12-20-28-
36-44-52-60
T 0.00° Table

C:\Users\TTWOOD\AppData\Local\Temp\[Link]

14
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

48
56 40

64 32

72 F 24 U W

E
D
80 16 3
C 4
B
A 1
88 8
2
<96>
Framed Hex
by Michiko Huynh (March 2010)
T Angles for R.I. = 1.540
61 + 6 girdles = 67 facets
C C
A 6-fold, mirror-image symmetry
2 96 index
1
L/W = 1.155 T/W = 0.373 U/W = 0.323
3 4 P/W = 0.501 C/W = 0.194
P
Vol./W³ = 0.303

PAVILION
1 55.00° 96-16-32-48-64-80
2 90.00° 96-16-32-48-64-80
3 41.00° 07-09-23-25-39-41-
55-57-71-73-87-89
4 45.50° 96-16-32-48-64-80 Foat in. Cut to your taste.
CROWN
A 45.00° 96-16-32-48-64-80
B 30.00° 06-10-22-26-38-42-
54-58-70-74-86-90
C 33.80° 96-16-32-48-64-80 Float in. Cut to your taste.
D 22.00° 96-16-32-48-64-80 Float in. Cut to your taste.
E 10.00° 96-16-32-48-64-80
F 0.00° Table Float in. Or may omit the table for a small stone.

The frames (facets A, B, D and E) may be left unpolished for an included stone to mask the inclusions.
C:\Users\Khai\Desktop\MICHIK~2\GEMCAD~1\MICHIK~1\FRAMED~[Link]

15
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

48
54 42

60 36

G 9
66 K C 30 6
J F

72 L 24 T L
HD A A 5
3
8
78 18
I
E
B 1 74
84 12
2
90 6
<96>
Voiceless Alveolar Fricative
By Jay Conner, 2015
Angles for R.I. = 1.540
65 + 8 girdles = 73 facets
C U 1-fold, mirror-image symmetry
96 index
4 L/W = 1.443 T/W = 0.692 U/W = 0.352
7 P/W = 0.621 C/W = 0.161
1
P Vol./W³ = 0.370

PAVILION CROWN
1 41.25° 03-05-11-13- A 39.00° 20-76
19-21-27-29- B 39.00° 10-38-58-86
35-37-43-45- C 37.08° 34-62
51-53-59-61-
D 30.15° 20-76
67-69-75-77-
83-85-91-93 E 29.09° 10-86
2 90.00° 10-34-38-58- F 28.57° 34-62
62-86 G 30.15° 38-58
3 90.00° 20-76 H 13.03° 20-76
4 81.98° 10-86 I 11.76° 10-86
5 84.26° 20-76 J 12.32° 34-62
6 81.98° 34-38-58-62 K 13.03° 38-58
7 45.95° 05-91 L 0.00° Table
8 58.21° 17-23-73-79
9 57.09° 40-56

C:\Users\eng\Documents\[Link]

16
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

48
54 42

60 36

66 30

72 D 24 U W

1
78 18
C 4
3 5
84 12
AB
2
90 6
<96>
Suki Suki
By Jay Conner, 2015
C
Angles for R.I. = 1.760
T
77 + 8 girdles = 85 facets
A 8-fold, mirror-image symmetry
3 96 index
5
4 L/W = 1.000 T/W = 0.487 U/W = 0.487
P P/W = 0.424 C/W = 0.122
1
Vol./W³ = 0.162
L

PAVILION
1 40.85° 03-09-15-21-27-33-39-45- Cut to centerpoint
51-57-63-69-75-81-87-93
2 90.00° 06-18-30-42-54-66-78-90 Set stone size
3 51.10° 06-18-30-42-54-66-78-90 Level girdle
4 41.79° 04-08-16-20-28-32-40-44- Meet 2, 3
52-56-64-68-76-80-88-92
5 44.02° 05-07-17-19-29-31-41-43- Meet 2, 3
53-55-65-67-77-79-89-91
CROWN
A 34.64° 06-18-30-42-54-66-78-90 Level girdle
B 25.38° 96-24-48-72 Meet A, girdle
C 25.50° 07-17-31-41-55-65-79-89 Meet girdle
D 0.00° Table

C:\Users\eng\Documents\[Link]

17
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

18
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

48
54 42

60 36

66 30

72 D G 24 T 4 L 4
C F 5 5 1
3 3 6
78 A 18
B E
2

84 12

90 6
<96>
Mischief
By Jay Conner, 2016
Angles for R.I. = 1.540
C U 43 + 4 girdles = 47 facets
2-fold, mirror-image symmetry
96 index
3
6
L/W = 1.140 T/W = 0.371 U/W = 0.325
P P/W = 0.459 C/W = 0.132
1
Vol./W³ = 0.158
W

PAVILION
1 44.10° 09-15-33-39-
57-63-81-87
2 90.00° 13-35-61-83
3 62.36° 13-35-61-83
4 43.13° 24-72
5 49.26° 13-35-61-83
6 49.17° 11-37-59-85
CROWN
A 40.88° 13-35-61-83
B 27.06° 10-38-58-86
C 30.66° 15-33-63-81
D 21.38° 24-72
E 18.95° 96-48
F 15.55° 13-35-61-83
G 0.00° Table

C:\Users\eng\Documents\[Link]

19
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

40 32 24

48 T 16 U W

C D F
B 6
2
A 5
4
56 <64> 8 3
Simply Radiant, Don Laufer, Headwaters Lapidary 8/2014
Created in GemCad by Robert Strickland for Don.
T Angles for R.I. = 2.160
C
49 + 8 girdles = 57 facets
A
2-fold, mirror-image symmetry
5 64 index
L/W = 1.000 T/W = 0.615 U/W = 0.615
6
P/W = 0.577 C/W = 0.142
P
Vol./W³ = 0.317
1

PAVILION
1 44.50° 03-13-19-29-
35-45-51-61
2 43.00° 08-24-40-56
3 90.00° 64-16-32-48
4 90.00° 08-24-40-56
5 60.00° 64-16-32-48
6 49.50° 01-15-17-31-
33-47-49-63
CROWN
A 40.00° 64-16-32-48
B 40.00° 08-24-40-56
C 30.00° 64-16-32-48
D 22.00° 01-15-17-31-
33-47-49-63
T 0.00° Table
F 22.16° 08-24-40-56

A note about angles: With (my) step 1 at 44.5 degrees, you will get a considerable viewer reflection from the
step 1 facets. To avoid this, subtract about 1.5 degrees from the pavilion (my) step 1, 2, and 6 angles
The only adjustment necessary will be on step F, and that will depend on the size of the first step
C:\Program Files (x86)\GemCadWin\Designs\Simply [Link]

20
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Mark Oros
I have had a great time editing the USFG The many friends that I have meet and
Newsletter the past four quarters. An worked with over the past year can
opportunity for editing a new lapidary continue to reach me at:
magazine has prompted me to resign as mark@[Link]
the USFG editor. I am happy to announce
that Dan Lynch will be your new editor. May your rough always be clean and your
Dan brings a wealth of experience and meets be perfect.
information to the position of editor. I
encourage you to continue submit and Best regards,
suggest articles and designs to Dan for the
upcoming newsletters. Dan can be Mark Oros
reached at: editor@[Link]

21
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

format & incorporate an selling

opportunity for faceters.

Rennie Castileno With this feedback in mind, the event

planning team met to discuss and plan
The 2016 San Francisco Bay Area this event. Much of the discussion
Faceters Forum is a wrap. focused on ensuring that decisions
were made based on a focus on
The Forum was held on the 20 th of continuing education in gemstone
August in San Mateo, CA and was co- faceting as well as broadening the
sponsored by the United States scope of the event to include interests
Faceters Guild, Ultra-tec faceting & and areas adjacent to faceting such as
Bay Area Faceting LLC. Other partner gemstone mining, mineralogy,
organizations including the GIA, gemology and jewelry design. The
Mineralogical Society of America team agreed to rename the event to
(MSA), Lightning lap, Gearloose, ‘Faceters Forum’ to be consistent with
Mineral & Gem Society of Castro a focus on continuing education and
Valley, SF GIA Alumni, Women’s interactive discussion requested.
Jewelry Association of Northern Finally, the team agreed to request that
California, and the Crucible provided attendees bring facet rough to sell in a
handouts, literature and/or silent auction format – which could
communications to their membership occur over the course of the event
in support of this event. without interrupting the event.

This event was a follow-up to the The event team selected the Marriott
successful SF Bay Area Faceters Frolic San Mateo as the venue due to its
held in March 2016. Several attendees central location in the Bay Area and
from the Frolic provided feedback to the conveniences of free shuttles to the
the event planning team about what SFO airport, free parking and being
worked well and what we could within walking distance of public
improve. We used this feedback in the transit to the North, South and East
planning of our second event this year. Bay areas.

Some of the key points of feedback The event started at 8:30 with
were: keep the presentations to 1 hour registration and drop off of silent
in length, focus on basics and auction items. Over 20 attendees used
fundamentals for people new to the Eventbrite online registration while
faceting as well as beginners and walk-ins registered and paid at the
intermediates, keep the event to 1 day door. Due to sponsorship subsidies,
the full day event cost was only $25
22
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

per person for 6 presentations and

buffet breakfast, lunch and afternoon Rick Velayo, GG – local gemstone
snacks. The event planning team also appraiser, was the next presenter. Rick
encouraged our sponsors and partners offered his insights on how he became
to identify VIPs from their an appraiser and the pathways to
organizations who would be interested becoming an appraiser. Rick spoke
in attending and would act as future briefly on what appraisers look for in
advocates for faceting events. gemstones. He summarized by saying
that while cut and color are important –
The event organizer, Rennie Castelino, he looks for the stone to “pop” and
provide opening remarks welcoming stand out with its optical performance.
the everyone to the event, providing
details and contact information about Rick Kennedy, local geologist,
the sponsors and partners and mineralogist and expert in Benitoite,
encouragement to the attendees to seek was the next presenter. Rick
out more information if they wanted entertained the attendees with his wit
learn more about anything presented at and stories about his efforts in rock
the event. With over 40 individual hounding at mines in the California /
items and parcels of facet rough and Nevada areas. Rick brought in some of
faceting media in the silent auction his personal collection of “rough and
showcase and bid sheets prepared, cut” mineral and faceted gemstone.
Rennie encouraged the attendees to Rick shared some valuable insights on
‘bid, bid, bid’! valuation and thoughts about when to
cut a stone vs. when to leave the
Sheahan Stephen, local and mineral intact.
internationally known expert in Sri
Lankan sapphires led off the After Rick Kennedy’s presentation, we
presentations with a powerful broke for lunch and invited the
presentation about the geography, attendees to chat with the presenters,
geology and mining conditions in Sri sponsors and partners about any
Lanka and gueda sapphires. Sheahan questions they had. Attendees bid on
is committed to improving working silent auction items and interacted with
conditions in mining and mines and is one another.
active in policy discussions. Sheahan
provided examples of heat treatment of Sheahan completed his presentation
sapphires and provided samples for after lunch and answered several
attendees to view and handle. Due to questions from the audience.
presenter schedules, Sheahan agreed to
complete the hands on part of his The next presenter was Rennie
presentation after lunch. Castelino’s presentation on Gem Id and
23
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

basics of selecting and buying facet boule) and working with a jeweler to
rough. Following insights from Rick complete the ring.
Velayo and Rick Kennedy, Rennie
offered some basic Gem ID evaluation After the event, silent auction winners
techniques including use of the ‘white settled up and took their winnings with
paper test’, fluid immersion (if them. We had a social / mixer in the
available) and some common sense lounge area of the Marriott.
guidelines for selecting facet rough. He
also provided some insights on buying All things considered – everyone had a
/ buying decisions and commonly great time, made some new friends and
available tools for under $35. several picked up some interesting facet
rough. Folks were also eager to know
Roland Arajs, our local advanced Gem- when the next event may take place. The
Cad user, was the next presenter. sense of community and passion for
Roland presented information on basics faceting with and among the group never
of Gem-Cad and switched back and ceases to amaze us.
forth between presentation and Gem-
Cad as he shared insights into design Future SF Bay Area Faceter events are in
choices in Gem-Cad. early planning stages with focus on
Technology in late 2016 / early 2017 and
For the last presentation, Rennie General Faceting in mid 2017,
stepped in to present on Basics of respectively.
Jewelry design due to a presenter
scheduling challenge. Rennie shared Contact Rennie Castelino at 650-766-
insights on several topics including 2905 or icecit@[Link] if you are
both educational and practical interested in learning more about the next
pathways to becoming a jewelry San Francisco Bay Area Faceters event –
designer – and shared links for local or would like to be involved in the next
educational institutions offering degree event, as a presenter, facet rough dealer or
and certificate programs in jewelry machine / tool vendor.
design. He offered a process map for
initial concept to completed jewelry
item. With Faceters commonly
working on cutting stones for rings,
earrings and pendants, Rennie provided
information and practical experience
on cutting and design experience in
creating an engagement ring using
synthetic sapphire (orientation in

24
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Another Franklin Faceters Frolic is in the next few days. If you are planning to
books. The 3-day event to promote and come to future FFF’s try to schedule some
bring together faceters was held July 28, time for this gathering.
29 & 30. There were lots of attendees,
vendors, guest speakers, a pretty stone Thursday started off with Robert
contest and a surprise. Strickland’s GemCad Beginner class and
later the Intermediate class. Vendors were
Wednesday night started off the festivities up and running with machines, supplies
with an informal dinner at the Boiler and lots of rough. Gerald Boykin was
Room at The Factory. In attendance were demonstrating the Ultra Tec Fantasy
vendors, organizers, helpers and patrons. machine and Ken Michalek was showing
This was a great time to catch up with old off a Raytech Shaw machine with an 8”
friends, make new ones and forecast the conversion.

Friday opened up with a full day of dealer visitor, Dave Wolley, of the Beale/Wolley
sales and the Advanced GemCad class. meter fame. He brought along the original
Later that morning we had a surprise modified Graves faceting head, a
25
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

modified Graves base and a lot of

fantastic stories. Lisa Elser of Custom Cut Friday evening we had the pizza party and
Gems started off the afternoon lectures Pretty Stone contest. With about 30 in
with a talk about “Going Pro”. Lisa attendance we enjoyed pizza supplied by
shared her experiences of setting up and The Factory and looked at some stunning
making a living as a faceter. Sue stones cut by the entrants. There were two
Lichtenberger followed with a discussion categories for the Pretty Stone, natural
on “Kitchen counter rock and gem ID”. and synthetic, Sue Lichtenberger took the
She showed how you can use common synthetic win by the narrowest of margins
household items to figure out what your and Mike Sassaman winning the natural
favorite rocks are. stone division.

Dave Woolley with the original Beale- Things wrapped up Saturday with the
Woolley depth of cut indicator on a Grand prize drawing for an 8” Gearloose
Graves Mark IV. Polishing Kit donated by Jon Rolfe of
Gearloose Lapidary and Tom Maxwell of
Saturday continued with dealer sales and Carolina Custom Gems. The winner was
demonstrations. Master cutter Jerry Call Billy Thomason of Dalton, GA. We also
gave the last lecture of the weekend on had a total of 17 new members and
cutting tips and maximizing your rough. renewals for USFG membership.

26
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Dealers in attendance this year were:

John E. Garsow Gems and Minerals
Carolina Custom Gems – Tom Maxwell & Joan Beckham
K2 Gemstones – Javed Awan

Ultra -TEC Reps Gerald Boykin - Javed Awan - Tom Maxwell and Joan Beckham
27
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Custom Cut Gems – Lisa Elser

Roy Kersey - Gem Rough

28
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Mitchell Jewelry Studio – Tom Mitchell

Lighting Laps and Polishes – Marsh Howard
GemCad – Robert Strickland
Dan Lynch Gems – Dan Lynch
Jersey Instruments – Charlie Musitano

I would like to thank Norm Holbert, Tom people and organizations none of this is
Maxwell, Sue Lichtenberger, and our possible.
behind the scene guy Al Balmer for all
the effort into making the Frolic what it FFF10 is already in the planning stages.
is. I would also like to thank the Factory Next year is going to be bigger and better
for their support for hosting us. My than ever. Keep an eye on the web site
biggest thanks go to the USGF for being [Link] for
our main sponsor. I would also like to developments.
thank Farooq Hashmi for his generous
donation to the Frolic. Without these Ken Michalek
Chairman FFF9

29
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Thomas Maxwell

The Third Annual Tucson Faceters Frolic will be held at the Old Pueblo Lapidary Club on
February 2, 3 and 4, 2017.

We will have GemCad Classes, Programs and Demonstrations along with a Tour of
Tucson Rough Dealers.

Details and registration information will be posted on the Tucson Frolic website soon.
[Link]

30
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Sue Lichtenberger, MD
In this final edition of kitchen counter identification, I will discuss a few more tests that
can be done easily and cheaply at home or in the field. This article will discuss magnetic
susceptibility, UV light responses, and what items are sometimes better purchased.

Magnetism

Magnetic susceptibility properties of gemstones and minerals have been used to help in
identifying and/or separating unknowns. Rather than go into this at length here, I will refer
you to the introductory article written by Kirk Feral for the USFG. It was published in the
December 2012 newsletter.

[Link]

Kirk's website [Link] has even more in depth analyses of

these properties and is kept up to date as new stones are discovered. How can I possibly
improve on six pages dedicated to garnets alone?!

As you read through his extensive research, pay close attention to the details and the
warnings. He lists semi-calibrated subjective responses of materials to magnets but
specifically uses a 1/2" x 1/2" cylindrical neodymium (rare earth) magnet: N52 (strength)
such as this one:

The wand was fabricated by my husband.

31
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Be aware of the risks of getting the magnet too close to credit cards and/or watches or
other sensitive electronics. Also be aware that the magnets are very brittle.

Kirk describes the responses as inert, diamagnetic (repelling), and dragging vs. pick up.
The site has videos that demonstrate the various responses while floating the specimen in a
small dish of water. For floats, you can use pieces of Styrofoam packing, bubble wrap, or
even a square cut from a foam egg carton! I'm able to pack my floats and magnet wand in
an old plastic dish I use for testing, keeping the magnet protected and away from other
metals.

For a list of ten ways magnetism helps with gem ID see:

[Link]

I was able to quickly separate out my true indicolite from other blue tourmalines based on
the drag response, as well as positively separate my orange garnets into spessartine vs.
hessonite.

UV fluorescence

Reaction to UV light is a beneficial trait of many naturally occurring gemstones. For the
purposes of this discussion, we will limit ourselves to long wave UV light, ~320-405nm.
The classics are ruby, fluorite, calcite, and apatite. Several others include scapolite,
sphalarite, barite, and strontianite. Most synthetics will also react to UV light. This is yet
another feature that may be used to aid in identification but again, NO ONE TEST
IDENTIFIES A STONE!

There are many options for UV light sources. The classic long wave UV light costs ~$300.
This requires an electric outlet.
32
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

There are many others on the market that are battery powered but are not as valuable in the
field because of low output. One solution is to use a UV laser pointer. These can be
purchased over the internet for ~$25-30. A few that we have bought have faulty switches,
so buyer beware! Another alternative is small push button lights that can be had for $1
each! Not as bright, but fits on a keychain.

Starting at the upper right: UV keylight $1-2, laser pointer $25, lighted loupe $10, UV
flashlight $5, and a different lighted loupe $8. Of these, only the keychain light and the
laser pointer are of value.

33
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Worth Buying

Not everything will be homemade...some things are better bought. They can still be
relatively inexpensive. You can make your own calcite dichroscope (there are directions
on various sites on the internet), but for <$30 you can buy one. I would rather be cutting
stones than making this tool, and it can frequently be purchased as a bundle with gem ID
books and various filters and loupes.

Favorites of mine:
• Belomo 10X Loupe $30

• Other lights from $1 to $35

34
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

From the top: Ott miniflip light, daylight LEDs (blue case) $15, penlight $5, keychain
lights $1-7 (photon II LED), Zelco Long reach Flexible Light (krypton/xenon) $25-30

• Generic Macro lens for phone/iPad (Mine came as a three lens set: macro, wide
angle, and fisheye $12:

• Dichroscope $25 (I pack mine with a scrap of non-facet grade iolite to demonstrate
how it works)

35
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

• Software: GTO Gemology Tools Professional $60 download from the website. This
program is a database of gem and mineral species. It has numerous pictures of
gemstones, data about each type, etc. but my favorite feature is the gemstone
separator. You enter in what data you know, decide how tightly you want to limit
parameters, and it generates a list of possibilities. I have no financial interest in this
enterprise but highly recommend it.
• Books: Gemstones of the World by Schumann $16 new. Singlehandedly the best all
encompassing book on gem ID. If you want to save money here, you can buy an
older edition or a used book for as little as $5, including shipping! Check out half
dot com as well as eBay and Amazon for used books.

My price estimates were generated from Amazon and other Internet sources at the time of
this writing.

Consider purchasing:

Depending on your needs, you may want to pick up some other tools. If you need to
identify metals or possible diamonds from estate sales or pawnshops, inexpensive diamond
testers are available as well as acid test kits for identifying silver, gold plate, as well as
various kt levels of gold. There are also color filters that can help further separate minerals
within stones.

36
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

• Color filters: PMCF (Hanneman's Poor Man's Color Filter) or a Chelsea filter

• Diamond tester $14

• Gold and silver test kit (acids) $15

Higher end purchases

If your exploration into gem and mineral ID takes you further into more formal avenues,
such as certification, you will need the big guns:
• OPL teaching spectroscope $165 plus stand for $140
• Gem refractometer $925 GIA, knockoffs $150 (risk that sometimes you get what
you pay for)
• Microscopes $1000's

37
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Summary

This past July, I was able to give a presentation at the Franklin Faceters Frolic in Franklin,
NC. There I spoke on the various techniques given in this series of four articles and
performed demos. Putting together a rock and mineral ID kit in a tackle box makes for a
handy travel package for fieldwork.

1. Specific Gravity:
Scales (with tare function), plastic cups, super glue (cyanoacrylate), thread, wire cage,
rubber bands. Cost: <$15

2. Polariscopy:
Polarized lens, phone, tablet or computer screen. Cost <$5

3. Magnetism:
Magnet, bowl, floats. Cost: ~$15 for magnet and supplies

4. Hardness:
Kit of small knowns (apatite, quartz, topaz, cz, corundum). Cost: free to <$5

5. UV:
Cost of lights: $1 to $35

Misc:
6. Lights/filters/dichroscope
Cost: dichroscope ~$35, Belomo loupe: ~$30

7. Software/books
Cost: ~$75

38
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

8. Tackle box
Cost: $15
Grand total: < $250

With this equipment, I was able to identify unlabeled cut stones in an estate collection for
over 600 stones. I purchased a collection of faceting rough from one of the shows in
Franklin several years ago. Included in the collection were a 67 ct blue topaz, a 12 ct
chrysoberyl, an 18 ct. andalusite, and two small bags of tsavorite garnet. I paid less $40 for
them (~$0.35 per ct) because these were all unidentified. Their conservative value is more
than $500, so I've more than paid for my identification tools!

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on the USFG forum, or email me.

39
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Jeff Theesfeld
This Gemstone is an "Omni Shield with similar quality and size. It ended up being
Mains" design, by Robert W. 10 x 9 MM, at 3.1 ct. This was very
Strickland. The design can be found on challenging for a novice as this was my
the website: very first Omni design attempt. John
[Link] Bailey, of the Faceting Academy,
as design number PC 23.052A OMNI provides a very good description of how
Shield with Mains. This was made from to cut an Omni design on his web site:
Oregon sunstone with a nice pink schiller, [Link]
from the Spectrum Mine near Plush, faceting/meet-point-videos/omni-
Oregon. I had purchased a 1-hour mine design/. If the original centerpoint is not
run and selected this piece from over 2 very accurate, leveling the girdle will be
pounds of rough. The Spectrum Mine Run quite difficult. Although I struggled with
is a very good value for a novice faceter this, the results were quite nice. This was
and I highly recommend looking into this a very rewarding gem to cut and my wife
deal. I have completed over a dozen gems adores it.
from this purchase already, all of very

40
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Jeff Theesfeld

This title is misleading. There is no talking about. Yes, that was my very first
possible way to master the art of faceting introduction to faceting gemstones. It was
in 3 months. With that said, I am the type not at all what I expected it to be. I was
of guy who is willing to try something immediately determined to learn
outrageous. It would not be unusual for everything I could about faceting gems
me to attempt something difficult, only and I set out to find a way to make my
because somebody told me that I wife a one-of-a-kind gemstone. Little did
shouldn’t…or I couldn’t. For example, I know how rapidly I would take on a
entering the 2016 USFG Single Stone whole new hobby.
Competition at the Masters Level with
less than 3 months faceting experience. Living in New Mexico, not far from Santa
The more appropriate title of this piece Fe, I figured there would be tons of
would be, “How to Create a Master artisans who could help me make a
Gemstone with Less than 3 Months beautiful gemstone from some recently
Faceting Experience.” obtained amethyst crystals. Although
Santa Fe is loaded with plenty of fine
This year’s deadline for submitting a jewelry shops, I couldn’t find anyone who
completed gemstone to the USFG, Single could facet gems from rough material. It
Stone Competition was the 20th of June. was a total strikeout! What I did learn
This is no exaggeration - as of New from a local gem shop owner was that
Year’s Day, 2016, I honestly thought that there happened to be a “small event” in
diamonds were created by using a chisel Tucson, Arizona, where I could find
to split the raw material along natural someone who might know a thing or two
cleavage planes. I pictured a little old man about how to facet gems. There might
hammering away at a rock until the final also be a few venders who might have
diamond face was cut. I had no idea how some raw gems they would consider
the beautiful polish of a fine gemstone selling. They call it the Tucson Gem and
was created. Then, thanks to a need to Mineral Show.
find my wife a birthday present, a newly
found fascination with gems, and I made a beeline for the bank, took out
YouTube, in February of this year, I came $100 cash, filled the car up with gas, and
across a video of a smart looking young drove on down with my slightly curious
man named Arya Akhavan demonstrating wife. Wouldn’t you know it, right there in
how to facet gemstones with his Ultratec the middle of Southern Arizona I
Faceting Machine. It was pure magic! He happened upon a faceting machine
sure looked like he knew what he was distributer. They sold the same UtraTec
41
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

machines, which that young man had

demonstrated on the Internet. I had only Over the next two days, in front of
brought $100 with me to Tucson, and had hundreds of onlookers, under the
already spent it all, along with charging instruction of Ernie, I created my very
another $1,000 on my credit card, at the first gemstone. It was a Novice 13, round
first gem show booth we came across. I design made from a smoky quartz chunk
wasn’t able to afford a shiny, new Utlatec, of rock. Well, Ernie kindly informed me
Facetron, Polymetric, Graves, nor any of that rocks are the hard stuff found in
the other faceting machines that the parking lots. What I had used was called
venders had for sale. What I did obtain in gemstone rough, not a rock. I liked this
Tucson was a very valuable piece of guy! Ernie’s style is to let you run with it.
information. The Ultratec vender He kept a bit of an eye on me, but for the
suggested that I look into joining the New most part, he allowed me to discover how
Mexico Faceters Guild. I should also try this machine worked on my own. He
and contact a gentleman from shared much information with me over
Albuquerque. Ernie Hawes was his name those two days, and it was a lot to take in.
and he might be willing to share a thing or On March 20th, I completed my very first
two about faceting. gem; with a lot of help form Ernie. I was
Back at home, my wife’s birthday passed, hooked!
without receiving an amethyst gemstone.
What she did get instead, was about If you are going to create a master
$1,100 worth of loose gems, and a whole gemstone in under 3 months, you have to
lot of promises from me. Then, for my take out some money from your
birthday, on March 19th, she took me to retirement fund to purchase your first
the Albuquerque Gem and Mineral show. faceting machine. Within a week, I had
The New Mexico Faceters Guild had a purchased a vintage, 1972, refurbished
display booth set up to demonstrate how Ultratec, V2, with a V5 Digital Mast
gemstones are made. At the NMFG booth Upgrade from Ernie. He had become my
was a gentleman sitting at his Ultratec new faceting mentor. He suggested that I
machine. I asked him if he knew Ernie spend some time getting to know my new
Hawes. With a sheepish grin, he replied, machine, and facet some novice designs
“Why yes I do. You are talking with from marbles. Although that sounded like
him.” He suggested that I sit down at his a reasonable plan, I didn’t have the heart
faceting machine. He demonstrated how to tell him that I was really itching to
to dop a piece of rough and attached it to work on some of the rough I had
his machine. He put a gem design in front purchased in Tucson. Here is a great time
of me and said, “Here is your first to apologize to Ernie for not following his
gemstone… have at it.” I was in heaven! advice. “I am sorry, Ernie, I can’t help
I had begun my faceting hobby on March myself!”
19th, 2016.
42
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

I was pleased to learn that Ernie liked to YouTube videos I had watched a few
design his own gemstones. He provided a months earlier. I joined the USFG, and
“How To” instruction booklet, along with faceted this novice design in a weekend. I
many of his personal gem designs. For still was not able to put a very good polish
my 1st solo gem, instead of faceting a on quartz.
novice design, I faceted one of his I joined the NMFG and attended my first
amazing 12-20 Round Brilliant designs, faceting workshop in Albuquerque. If you
with about 6000 facets. It was hard, but I are going to create a master gemstone in
did it. I completed a huge, 8+ carat, clear under 3 months, you can’t be afraid to ask
quartz, scratchy, dull, magnificent, questions and listen to what others have to
beautiful gem, all by myself! Here, I tell you. One of the wonderful folks at
would like to re-emphasize that no one…I this workshop introduced me to Cerium
mean NO ONE, can become a master Oxide polish, and I was off putting a
faceter in 3 months, or even in 3 years! respectable polish on quartz in no time.
Perhaps, maybe 30 years, but certainly Of course, one of the things you are
not in 3 months. thinking about, as you are learning to
I totally respect and admire anyone who facets gems, is, ”When should I try to
has worked in this art form. Even though facet other materials?” When I had
every bit of common sense says you reviewed the competition designs for the
should stick with novice designs, learn USFG, I figured that the higher level
your lessons, and take your time at first, I stones would be made from topaz, or
am not built that way. This was sapphire, or perhaps, even diamond.
something totally new and amazing to me, While I was looking, in awe, at the USFG
and I was going to challenge myself as Master Competition “Event Horizon”
much as possible. After two gems, I knew design, I noticed that it was designed by
what a pavilion was, I had created a level Arya as well, and it could be made from
girdle, and the meets on my table all met quartz! No way! By this time, I had
the star facets on the crown, almost. acquired some really clear smoky quartz
rough, and I was itching to cut into that.
I was yearning to learn more about all the
amazing designs out there. How many I could polish quartz, I could get meets
could there be? Which were most close, and I could care less if I screwed
beautiful? Which should I try next? This up. I knew that establishing the correct
led me to the US Faceters Guild Internet size of the master design would be a real
homepage. There, I noticed that the challenge, but I am pretty good at math
USFG puts on an annual faceting and geometry. I could work out the range
competition. I reviewed the competition of the length to end up with the required
designs, and guess what? The novice width. These were tight tolerances. I had a
gem, “Treforze” was designed by Arya little time left until June 20th. I could
Akhavan, the same young man in those attempt this design as a challenge, as a
43
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

way to learn quickly, and as a way to cheater like mad, even on the break
make my wife a nicer gem. My master facets. This particular design is
gemstone quest had begun, just a month completely unforgiving for mistakes, and
after having faceted my very first gem. the gem had shifted on the wax during
Sorry Ernie, I had to try! (By the way, transfer. Although I finished the stone,
The Pre-Master gem looked way harder within size tolerances again, it was a
than the Master design to me.) disaster! It polished up nicely, and was
really pretty to the naked eye, but I simply
My first Event Horizon attempt was full could not submit this stone.
of lessons. My stone would jump off the
dop and fly in every direction. It kept I gave these practice gems to my wife and
taking the plunge into the bottom of my she mounted them. She had her first pair
tray. I cleaned it up, glued it back on, and of amazing earrings. They are gorgeous,
kept on learning form my mistakes. I and she loves them. They just don’t meet
managed an imperfect, but reasonably USFG Master standards, by any means.
polished gem, which came in within the
tight size tolerances. My control over my A fracture in the 3rd attempt resulted in a
machine needed much improvement. My gem that would not meet the size
mentor provided some much needed tolerances. I did remake that gem into the
advice on how to keep from having to use Novice “Treforze” design, completing a
the cheater. I learned to clean up the swarf matching pair of gems for my daughter.
a little more regularly between laps. I They are simply beautiful. No matter
reviewed the USFG rules, estimated what what happened next, I was having a blast
I would need to do to make a stone that making outstanding gems. But, time was
could meet the minimum score for running out for the Master competition. I
certification, and then started on my 2nd had one weekend left to make a gem I
gem. could submit in time for the deadline.

The pavilion and the girdle came in real I knew that I had to be swift, but I also
nice on my 2nd attempt. I was stoked! had learned that I must be patient. That is
Could I really do this after all? Ernie first quite a dilemma for someone who is
showed me a method to use wax and glue trying to get certified as a Master Faceter,
to dop my stones. In theory, the glue after only 2 months of experience. I dove
holds very tight while the wax will come straight into the 4th attempt, but in a calm
off fairly easily when making the transfer. and collected manner.
While I like this method a lot, it caused a
real problem for me after transfer. When I This gem was turning out great. Meets
started on the crown, everything went within ¼ inch, scratches less than 1 mm
haywire. Every angle was gone, and I deep. Just kidding. This one was it! My
couldn’t figure out why. I was using the best gem yet. Not a single use of the
44
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

cheater throughout the entire process. meet that standard, but it might. I gave it a
Then, on my last set of facets, I selected try. To be honest, all I am hoping for is
the wrong index. I plowed into the crown that I get a score of 85 or better. That is
and cringed. I tried to compensate with the same score it takes to certify at the
adjustments to previous facets and began Novice level. I have completely enjoyed
to go downhill fast. I was shattered. the USFG competition, regardless the
outcome. It was an experience I will
If you are going to create a Master never forget, and one I can’t relive. The
Gemstone in under 3 months, you can’t best part is, my wife has a handmade pair
give up hope. I polished the newly of earrings, with a fun story that goes
created, 83rd facet, into a design that calls along with them. I have also made her a
for 82 facets. To me, it is a handsome beautiful amethyst gemstone, with one of
creation, beautifully polished, with Ernie’s amazing designs, of course. I had
marginal meets. It also has an extra facet. created my Master Gemstone, in less than
This is completely unacceptable for a 3 months, which I felt was worthy of
Master Faceter, but I was not trying to be being judged by the USFG.
a Master. I was trying to make a Master
Gem. This is a huge difference. I To all the faceters who submitted stones
packaged up my Event Horizon and for the 2016 USFG competition - Great
submitted it to the USFG on time, hoping job! I wish you all the best results.
that maybe Arya and Ernie might be
proud of me for trying such a lofty design. I am one step closer on the long road to
becoming a true Master Faceter, like my
As of today, I have no Idea what the mentor. Thank you so much Ernie Hawes.
results of the judging will be. I would I look forward to faceting as many of
need a score of 93 to have this gem your wonderful designs as I can. I relish
certified as a Master. I highly doubt it will the challenge.

45
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

but do not furnish the angles and indices

because their patterns are used in their
business. While this latter case is
Wayne Barnett understandable many of their patterns are
similar to those that have been freely
Every month there are one or more published.
patterns for a faceted stone published in
Facets. Add to this the number of guild In the early days of hobby faceting
newsletters published monthly or less numerous individuals would submit and
often. To this number there are over 4300 have their designs published in Gems and
cuts in the web-based [Link]. Minerals or Lapidary Journal. Today
While there are more than 4300 designs in those sources have all but gone away.
the database only 1581 at the time of this Gems and Minerals is no longer published
writing (July, 2016) are open (about and Lapidary Journal has morphed into a
35%). Open, in their definition, means jewelry magazine that only occasionally
that the diagram with cutting angles and publishes a facet design. In the past if we
indices are available either within the wanted to have a pattern for a special
application itself (click on any design piece of rough we would have to look
label that says Open and the text is in through the limited resources or design a
blue) or in ASCII format. ASCII format is pattern, usually with paper and pencil and
a text format that can be transferred from on the lap, writing everything down as we
one application to another; in this case, cut. In that period I had a nice piece of
while it can be opened in a text editor or Herkimer quartz that had the terminations
word processer, it is formatted for broken. I wanted to cut a stone that would
GemCad. Once brought into GemCad the have the best yield for the material. The
pattern may be saved as a .gem file as is design that I came up with was a square
or modified then saved on your computer. cut corner pattern. Many years later I
There are numerous other sources online learned that the pattern was very close to
as well as collections in paper format. the diamond Asscher cut.
Some designers put their patterns online

46
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Index GemLib
N Fold Symmetry
Gear Designs
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16
32 16 8 4 2 109
40 20 10 8 5 4 8
48 24 16 12 8 6 4 3 28
56 28 14 8 7 4 1
60 30 20 15 12 10 6 5 4 17
64 32 16 8 4 1097
72 36 24 18 12 9 8 6 105
77 11 7 1
80 40 20 16 10 8 5 326
84 42 28 21 14 12 7 6 10
88 44 22 11 8 29
96 48 32 24 16 12 8 6 2989
99 33 11 9 4
120 60 40 30 24 20 15 12 10 8 152

With thousands of potential designs to cut gear listed in the left column. Many
it would seem that the potential for new designs can be converted to another index
designs have been exhausted. While the gear with whole index values. Those that
practical number of degrees between cannot should be considered unique.
which a given type of stone can be cut
and be within the effective range of light So what do you do when you when you
refracting and reflecting off the internal have an interesting piece of rough to be
surfaces of the facets and the number of cut and a Standard Round Brilliant (also
indices available is finite, the number of known as SRB) is just passé. One solution
patterns possible does not appear to be is to look through the listing of open
exhausted. While many designs can be designs in [Link] (there is a
interchanged between different index filter button at the bottom of the search
gears therefore reducing the number of page) or look through any number of the
true new designs based on selected index other online or paper sources. Many of
gear, many designs cannot. See table the designs online without a picture or
above. The numbers in the chart reflect libraries in paper form may not have been
the symmetries that can be cut with whole test cut. If there is not a picture of a cut
index setting for a given gear. The stone for a given pattern it would be best
number of designs in the last column only to cut that pattern in a lesser material to
reflects the number of designs stored in make sure that it can really can be
GemLib Version One under the index successfully executed. This author has cut
47
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

patterns that have been published that are look for a given design. However, not all
uncuttable as published. One might be cuts are in these public domain sources
wary when the pattern has a set of facets and, in many that are, the angles and
that are only a degree apart or indices that indices are withheld.
are one tooth different from each other.
Patterns can be designed in GemCad that In one recent case a designer published
cannot be successfully executed on the their design in Facets with all the
lap. information for cutting it then submitted
to Facetdiagrams and withheld the
When an appropriate pattern is not instructions. In Facets it was noted that
available or to be found, from sources or the design was copyrighted. The question
patterns available even online, the cutter that begs to be asked here is: Why the
may need to develop their own pattern to double standard? In the first case the
fit the stone at hand to be cut. When this instructions were given and in the second
is the case the cutter needs to just design case withheld. If the designer wanted to
the pattern and if it shows up as a keep the instructions tight why were they
duplicate later on, so-be-it. published in Facets? There are a number
of talented designers that have many
While we have more resources today to patterns to their credit. Some of these
check to see if a given design has already designers offer their designs as collections
been created, not all designs have been to the public. Some of the older
published or if they have, are not easily collections were offered for not much
accessible. When the pattern is part of a more than the reproduction costs, others,
given designer’s collection that may be more recently, quite a bit more. While
available for sale or being held tight it is there is nothing wrong in creating a
probably unreasonable to assume that the business by designing cutting patterns for
pattern has been cut. It is probably sale the market for such collections is
impossible to collect all the pattern sets inherently limited. One of the
and then go through them every time you shortcomings of these libraries is unless
have a ‘new’ concept. The cutter should all patterns have been test cut then even
develop their pattern and cut their stone. I the designer may not be sure that they can
know that patterns that are similar to be executed in the lap. This author has
those already available have been created. had direct experience in that type of
Back in the day, before computers and situation.
GemLib and web searching, when we had
far fewer resources and the ability to cross In another type of situation a designer
check designs we were pretty much on may develop a pattern then publish it in a
our own when designing faceting cuts. public forum without test cutting it. Even
Today with tools such as GemCad, though the pattern may be designed for a
GemLib and Facetdiagrams it is easier to given type of material the cut needs to
48
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

verified on the lap, in this author’s least once. In one case a pattern was
opinion, before being published in a created for a jeweler that was cut multiple
public forum. The test cutting need not be times for their business and has yet to be
cut in material the design was intended, published because of the context for
although that would be ideal, at least it which it was created. When that source of
would verify that the design was realistic cutting is terminated it will probably be
on the lap. While the designer should be summited for publication. Most of what I
the one doing the test cutting anyone design is for stones that need something
selected to such a task would be that is not readily available or I do not
acceptable. We ran into such a case want to take hours looking through all the
recently and my wife, an accomplished resources online or in my library for a
faceter herself, commented, “Why would pattern that will take me a few minutes to
someone publish a pattern that had not create in GemCad. With GemCad or other
been test cut?” tools available it is relatively easy to
create a pattern on the fly and get to the
While this author has had a few patterns lap instead of searching out something
published out of about 50 designs created, that may not exist. What path each faceter
all published patterns have been cut at takes is up to them.

49
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

48
54 42

60 36

66 30

72 24 U W

78 18

84 12

90 6
<96>
Cut for small Sapphire
Designed by Wayne Barnett
Angles for R.I. = 1.762
T 25 + 8 girdles = 33 facets
8-fold radial symmetry
C
96 index
L/W = 1.000 T/W = 0.622 U/W = 0.622
P/W = 0.391 C/W = 0.159
P Vol./W³ = 0.223

PAVILION
38.00° 96-12-24-36-48-60-72-84
90.00° 96-12-24-36-48-60-72-84
CROWN
40.00° 96-12-24-36-48-60-72-84
32.00° 06-18-30-42-54-66-78-90
0.00° Table

This cut was created to be used on small sapphires, like those found in Montana. When the stone is to be mounted
the girdle should be round and not faceted. The light return on this pattern is very good as represented by ray tracing
in GemCad.
\\Mac\Home\Library\CONT~YR5\COMA~[Link]\Data\Library\MAIL~7IE\13D1~1S8\SAPP~[Link]

50
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

<96>
6 90

12 84

18 78

24 72
T L
30 66

36 60

42 54
48
Kite for Topaz
Designed by Wayne Barnett
Angles for R.I. = 1.610
33 + 6 girdles = 39 facets
C U 1-fold, mirror-image symmetry
96 index
L/W = 1.327 T/W = 0.943 U/W = 0.621
P
P/W = 0.517 C/W = 0.135
Vol./W³ = 0.271
W

PAVILION
41.00° 96-12-30-66-
84
51.00° 96-12-30-66-
84
61.00° 96-12-30-66-
84
90.00° 96-12-30-66-
84
90.00° 48
65.50° 48
CROWN
45.00° 96-12-30-66-
84
39.00° 03-93
0.00° Table
37.50° 09-87
37.10° 15-81
38.80° 29-67
35.00° 31.5-64.5
28.44° 48

This cut was designed for a pendant for a friend. He wanted a kite pattern to complement the kite shaped stone in he
engagement ring. The return of light is not remarkable but stones of this type of pattern typically do not have great
performance.
\\Mac\Home\Library\CONT~YR5\COMA~[Link]\Data\Library\MAIL~7IE\24F5~2XJ\TOPA~[Link]

51
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

48
54 42

60 36

66 30

72 24 U W

78 18

84 12

90 6
<96>
Standard Brilliant for Sapphire
Calculated by Wayne Barnett
Angles for R.I. = 1.760
C T
57 + 16 girdles = 73 facets
8-fold, mirror-image symmetry
96 index
L/W = 1.000 T/W = 0.565 U/W = 0.565
P P/W = 0.350 C/W = 0.105
Vol./W³ = 0.159
L

PAVILION
90.00° 03-09-15-21-27-33-39-45-
51-57-63-69-75-81-87-93
36.05° 03-09-15-21-27-33-39-45-
51-57-63-69-75-81-87-93
35.00° 06-18-30-42-54-66-78-90
CROWN
35.00° 03-09-15-21-27-33-39-45-
51-57-63-69-75-81-87-93
28.32° 06-18-30-42-54-66-78-90
15.49° 96-12-24-36-48-60-72-84
0.00° Table

These angles have been optimized for RI 1.76, saphires and rubies. Many times the material available is a flat
fragment, like those from Montana. These angles will allow for a wider but thiner stone that does ot sacrifice light
return.
\\Mac\Home\Library\CONT~YR5\COMA~[Link]\Data\Library\MAIL~7IE\E7DC~I37\STAN~[Link]

52
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Jerry Bartlemay

At one time or another, all of us are really, really, tiny. That means it is
faced with the decision of whether or hard to see them sufficiently to do a
not to cut those pesky accent stones to good job with meets and polish. They
set off our main stones in jewelry. This also have a habit of coming off the dop
article tries to address when and why if the conditions aren’t just right. We
we cut them, and one method of tend to throw away pieces of rough
cutting them that should help eliminate that would be the right size for LTGs,
the fear of failure we all experience. so there is often a tremendous amount
of waste for what you get back.
I consider LTGs to be stones that are 3
mm or smaller. They are generally So why bother? Well, if a good friend
round, so that is the assumption here. (a really good one, one who would bail
They are used as accent stones around you out of jail) or a family member
other larger stones, but occasionally (one we really do love and cherish)
are used in groups as the main stones needs gems for a gift or personal piece
themselves. of jewelry, it feels good to cut all the
gems for them. Also, while some
LTGs purchased online are pretty,
often they are not very sparkly. We
pride ourselves on the optical results,
even for tiny gems. When we cut
them, we control the angles and
designs, therefore we control brilliance
and scintillation.

It’s also much easier to get a matched

set, matching size and color with the
main gem, if we provide the rough. I
In general, faceters don’t see LTGs as do have to say, though, that when I
worth cutting. They are readily ordered 30 2 mm citrines from Tripps,
available from online sources such as I asked them do size and color match
Tripps, often for less than $1 apiece. them. They did a great job, especially
We tend to think of them taking nearly considering the small amount they
the same amount of time to cut as a made from them at 95 cents each.
larger stone.
About a year ago, our son and
There are also a number of difficulties girlfriend hit us with the knowledge
many of us have experienced in that they were getting married in a
cutting LTGs. First of all, they are month. I was asked to do the gems for

53
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

her custom made ring. At the time, I citrine. Since time wasn’t an issue
thought it would take me many days to here, I was determined to cut all the
cut the 22 LTGs plus spares for her stones, not just the big one. As a result,
ring in addition to the larger central I had to rethink what I was doing in
stone, so I ordered them from Tripps. order to not fret over each and every
Like I stated above, they did a one of the 15 stones I planned to cut.
fantastic job in matching them, and
they looked great in the ring. Jerry’s Method for Cutting LTG’s

First, I had to put what I was doing in

perspective. There were several pieces
of information I had when I really
though about it that helped me. Okay,
maybe not information, but my
opinion, and not necessarily that
humble, either.

1. The stones are really small, and no

one will look at meet points. Not
that they are important, you just
can’t see them easily.
Sara’s First Ring 2. Transfer alignment isn’t critical. If
someone is looking to see if the
crown and pavilion facets line up
perfectly, they have too much
As you can see, the central stone is time on their hands.
prong mounted, and had to sit up 3. Faceted girdles are wasted on
above the rest of the ring, making it LTGs. Round girdles are easier to
inevitable that it would get chipped. set, and less likely to break during
Sara is a hairdresser, and had to clean the setting process.
the ring several times a day, not to 4. Fancy designs are also a waste of
mention it had a habit of getting time. Any bit of scintillation will
caught in her client’s hair. In addition, look the same whether it is from a
the large size of it tended to swell her brilliant or step design; all those
fingers and it would get flashes of light are so stinking
uncomfortable. small it’s hard to tell the
difference.
So, it was inevitable that she would
redesign the ring and have it redone. Having said all that, I worked on a
This time, she wanted 12 2 mm variation of the petal cut we use for the
citrines around an 8 mm central faceting classes. I cut the eight-sided

54
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

petal in the past for these small stones, be anywhere but on the dop a few too
but it still seemed to be not quite round many times, though. This is the most
enough. I expanded it to a 12-sided frustrating part of LTGs for most
petal. Then I tweaked the angles until I people. Because of this, I decided to
liked the result. I wanted good tilt try CA, or cyanoacrylate, glue.
performance as well as face up Normally, I find it too strong an
brilliance, and I think I did a decent job. adhesive, but in this case, I figured it
would be just the thing I needed.
The first step is to choose the right
rough. First of all, small stones lack It takes an incredibly small touch on a
saturation, so pick rough that is fairly flat dop to glue it to the stone. If you
dark. I took larger pieces of citrine that
were the right color, and used a
combination of tile nippers and a trim
saw to break them up into very small
pieces. What I discovered is that a 2
mm stone needs an extremely tiny
piece of rough. Basically, it you think
a piece of rough is small enough,
usually you should cut it in half and
get two stones. Now is a good time to
pull out those chips and ant hill stones.
Small tumbled stones are great as well. are using a cone dop, give it more time
Once you have chosen your rough, it’s for the glue in the cone to set up. I
time to dop it up. I acquired several 2 tended to glue up several and set them
mm dops so I could work in an aside to develop a strong bond. Here is
assembly line fashion and didn’t have an almost too large piece of rough
to wait for transfers. glued to a 2 mm dop.

Step one - CLEAN YOUR STONE

AND DOP. I know, this is always
important, but you are dealing with an
incredibly small glue surface. If you
didn’t saw the rough, grind a flat spot
where you want the table to be.

In the past, I used epoxy like I usually

do. I experienced the stone’s desire to

55
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Note the lack of a fillet of glue around girdle. Use whatever magnification to
the stone. CA glue turned out to be make them meet at or very close to the
plenty strong without it, and you’re girdle; it’s reasonably important, even
going to grind it off anyway if you cut here, to have an even girdle.
a 2 mm stone with a 2 mm dop. Remember, through all of this, keep
After the glue has had time to cure your finger on that stone!
(just a few minutes), it’s time to grind
the girdle. I stuck with a round girdle

as mentioned. Since I was starting To polish, use your standard polishing

with a very small piece of rough, I method. On these citrines, as usual, I
used a 1200 grit diamond lap for my used John Bailey’s Voodoo Magic
roughing. Polish, going straight from a 1200 to a
14K polish on Corian. Yes, I do still
Set up your faceting machine to free- have some pride, so I polished the
wheel, and set up a hard stop at 90 girdle, too. At this time, it’s starting to
degrees. Then gently turn the quill and look really pretty, just like a real
round up your rough. Keep your finger gemstone.
on it as much as possible in order to
reduce the pressure on the glue joint. Now for the transfer. At first, I tried a
Take your diameter down to just over normal transfer, gluing a cone dop to
the size you want it to finish at to the polished pavilion. I soon realized,
allow for a .1 mm removal of material though, that CA glue doesn’t stick
when you polish. nearly as well to a polished pavilion as
it does to that rough spot you ground
Now cut your pavilion break facets. on the rough. It was at this point where
Use the best method you have for I came up with the idea (opinion) that
cutting an even pavilion. It’s difficult transfer alignment was not all that
to see, but check the scalloped girdle critical on LTGs. As a result, I
for evenness, as well as the culet. mechanically broke the stone off the
first dop. I know, I’ve just committed
Then it’s time to cut the main facets in heresy, but I’m an engineer and don’t
to meet with the points of the scalloped

56
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

like that box most people find tried this several more times,
themselves locked in. Now I could expecting a different result, I decided
carefully balance the stone on the flat not to do it any more. We learn best
dop on the bottom of my transfer jig, through pain, after all.
lower the cone dop over it with some
CA glue in the cone, and voila, transfer The solution was simple; if the glue
completed. wanted to go into the joint between the
lower dop and the stone, put something
else there to keep it from happening. I
had some white lithium grease in a little
bottle, so I dabbed some of that on
there. The added benefit was that it held
the stone to the dop and kept it from
wanting to fall off. Now, I could put a
tiny amount of CA in the cone dop,
Well, it wasn’t quite that simple. As lower it over the pavilion, and I was
soon as the cone dop lowered over the good to go.
pavilion, the glue traveled down the
side of the stone to the joint between While CA glue sets up quickly, it’s
the top of the lower dop and the stone, only instantaneous when you touch it
wicked in, and immediately set up. I and things stick to your fingers. Give
the transferred stone a few minutes to
1 2 firmly set up before you proceed.

Now that the pavilion is done and

the stone is transferred, the rest is
simple.

Cut your pavilion break facets on the

same 1200 grit lap as before. Now,
was right back where I started. After I though, you have to pay attention to
the girdle depth. For a 2 mm stone, I
3 4 recommend no more than 0.1 to 0.15
mm. I know this is hard to measure,
but if it looks big, it’s probably too
thick. Don’t take it down to a razor
line, though. You’ll have your jeweler
cussing you as a result.

Now cut your mains in. Just like on the

pavilion, it’s important to make sure

57
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

the mains just touch the points of the Don’t even try to use heat to remove it.
scalloped girdle line the breaks Most CA glue is relatively immune to
created. the level of heat we are comfortable
subjecting a stone to. Drop the stone
and dop into a jar of acetone and let it
sit for a while. How long depends on
the type of CA you use, but typically,
after an hour there is no trace of the
glue left.

At this point, you could polish what

you’ve done. I recommend against it,
even though there are no meets with Here is a picture of Sara’s ring number
the table to worry over. If you cut and two. The central stone was surrounded
polish the table, then go back and by a large bezel with very small
polish the crown facets, you save diamonds. The central stone is citrine,
yourself one lap change. You also and there are six 2 mm stones on each
handle the polishing lap less, giving side of the single shank. The ring
yourself minimum chance to design is gorgeous, don’t you think?
contaminate it. When the crown is This is why I cut these stones.
done, it’s time to take it off the dop.

58
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

59
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Book Review by Mark Oros

Tom Herbst begins his new faceting book This is where Mr. Herbst’s book excels.
explaining why he decided to write it, The first 130 pages of the book deal with
with two main points: bringing the beginner up to speed on the
basic education of faceting before he
• It has become increasingly hard to find jumps into faceting instructions. I believe
out-of-print faceting instruction that this is a critical step in learning to
books. facet and personally spend the first
• There has been a lot of technology faceting lesson I give to new students
change since the last faceting books going over similar material. This step
were written. creates a common lexicon between the
student and the teacher and allows the
When I was first starting to learn to facet, faceting beginner to prepare for the
I searched for faceting books to read and instruction part of the manual by
learn. I was surprised to find them all out familiarizing them with the faceting
of print and commanding a high price machine, laps, supplies and building both
based on their scarcity. Not willing to pay a base of knowledge and anticipation of
hundreds of dollars for some of them, I faceting with confidence.
searched on a daily basis and picked them
up as reasonably priced as possible. I Mr. Herbst then transitions into the
enjoyed reading my newfound library of instruction part of his first volume. It is
faceting books and manuals; however, it here that he takes a different approach to
felt like I was reading history books. All faceting instructions by being more
the basics on faceting were there, but the detailed-oriented than I have seen in other
products they suggested buying were no instruction manuals. He goes on with
longer available or had been replaced chapters detailing:
years ago. Coming from a technology
based career (Internet research and GeM101
development), I understood how quickly Gem Rough
technology and products can change in Dopping
today’s world. I felt that I had learned the Cutting and Polishing
basics from Vargas, Long, Steele and
Graham, but I was no closer to knowing All three of these topics are covered in-
what machine, laps and supplies to depth and address the current technology
purchase. and the state-of-the-art of faceting. I must
confess that I picked up more than a few
insights and techniques to improve my

60
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

faceting skills reading these informative swiftly into the actual hands on
chapters. instruction part of faceting.

“Amateur Gemstone Faceting Volume 1: You can find excerpts from his book
The Essentials” by Tom Herbst is now a “Amateur Gemstone Faceting Volume 1:
serious purchase recommendation that I The Essentials” at
make to all my new students and also to [Link]
my novice students. Mr. Herbst has set a [Link] Please enjoy this sample
new standard for faceting books along content while I go and read his second
with making them readily available and book in the series “Amateur Gemstone
affordable. I am not surprised that he has Faceting Volume 2: Expanding Your
a five-star review rating on Amazon Horizons”.
where his book can be purchased for
$26.95. You can check in on Tom Herbst and his
latest endeavors at his website.
[Link] [Link]
Gemstone-Faceting-1-
Essentials/dp/3000474749/ref=asap_bc?ie When Mark Oros is not writing book
=UTF8 reviews and lapidary articles, he can be
found designing and faceting gemstones
As a faceting teacher, equipment reseller at the boutique faceting and lapidary
and rough dealer, this new faceting book studio Hashnu Stones & Gems.
has significantly streamlined my job by [Link]
bringing new faceting students up to
speed quickly and allowing me to move

61
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Glenn Ruminson

Whenever I take a gemstone off the dop, put a bit more certainty into the
I have a moment of angst. Will it be a outcome.
“Smokin’ Stone” or suitable only for
fish tank viewing. I think you’ll agree The First Pathway involves developing
with me, all of us want more of the first and educating your Inner Gemstone
and less of the second. Fashionista’s eye for beauty. The
Second Pathway focuses on expanding
First let’s admit—not every cut your Inner Design Guru’s knowledge of
gemstone will appeal equally to how design structure creates gemstone
everyone. After all, “Beauty Is In the beauty. Each pathway can lead to
Eye of the Beholder.” Most of us will happier moments on removal of our
cut colored gems. And when it comes to stone from the dop. And skill with both
color, preferences vary and fashion pathways can make this happen more
tastes change over time. Some may often.
prefer just rich colors. Colored stones
cut in designs that lack brilliance can So let’s start our exploration. Pathway 1:
still be pretty. Others may want more Developing your eye for beauty. At this
lively colored gems, with brilliance and level, “I like it. It’s beautiful” is all you
scintillation. Some may prefer a lot of need for your evaluation. I think most of
dispersion when cutting colorless gems. you are already exploring the world of
Others may prefer more brightness. gemstone beauty at our guild meetings.
Bottom line— there are a lot of right If not, take advantage of the monthly
choices out there. gemstone fashion show. Ask questions
about what you see. Get the names of
I can imagine you’re wondering, “With designs you like. Ask your guild peers
so many right choices, why do I need to about their favorite designs. Start
learn more about picking gemstone building a collection of choice designs.
designs?” I’m willing to bet that you’d Then you’ll always be able to cut what
prefer “fab” over mediocre. And I know you know will be beautiful.
that at least some of you yearn to make
better design choices. Some of you will be satisfied with this
endeavor, and won’t want to go beyond
Tonight we’re going to look at two this stage. If so, that’s O.K. But if you
pathways to picking better gemstone want to go beyond “I like it, it’s
designs for beauty that hopefully will beautiful,” as your only tool for
evaluation, you’re going to need to

62
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

advance to the next level of Pathway 1-- brilliance. We’d usually not want to see
Educating Your Eye For Beauty. concentrated areas of minimal brilliance.

Rest assured, there are no right or wrong For evaluation purposes, we first
choices here. The bottom line is always, examine our gem face-up at about 12
“do I like what I see.” And this isn’t a inches, with no movement of stone or
complex skill. It just takes a little head. Then we slowly tilt our gem to see
understanding of gemstone viewing how well it maintains that level of
features and the light needed to see brilliance through tilt. We’ll be
them. evaluating for coverage, persistence
through tilt, and total amount of
Beauty in our better cut gemstones brilliance.
comes from the simultaneous presence
of brilliance, scintillation, and To estimate the amount of brilliance, we
dispersion. The structured light returned can compare our gem with the least most
to the eye creates a lively gemstone. brilliant stones in our collection. Think
Well-distributed dark areas provide in terms of somewhat brilliant, brilliant,
contrast and drama. With no structure to and very brilliant. As we get skilled,
the light return, our gems would be we’ll be able to make this judgment
mirror-like, and the view uninteresting. without comparison stones.
Even less brilliant stones with adequate
structured light return may be as Scintillation—flashes of white or
interesting as more brilliant ones. colored light that appear to turn on and
off with gemstone tilt or movement of
So let’s take a look at those creators of the head.
beauty, brilliance, scintillation, and
dispersion, and how we evaluate them. We’d like to see these flashes distributed
over the crown facet area and table. And
Brilliance is the amount of light that we’d like their size to be right for
gets reflected back to the eye by our gemstone size. Our best pattern—
gemstone. No gem will return 100% of reflections that twinkle and re-shuffle on
the light that goes in. tilt. Acceptable but less desirable—
reflection patterns that shift on tilt.
What do we expect to see? A superior Undesirable--hot spots, bright areas that
design will have brilliance evenly remain lit through tilt. Also
distributed over the table and crown undesirable—minimal to no flashes in
facet area and will maintain brilliance crown facets or table area.
through some tilt. Lesser designs will
have noticeable areas in crown facets or When evaluating this feature, we’ll rock
table area that have different levels of our gem in a figure-eight motion,
viewing distance, 12 inches. We’ll be

63
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

evaluating for distribution, size, pattern, light displays brilliance as well as the
and amount of scintillation flashes. first two options. Best stone to light
distance—2 to 4 ft. A Single LED,
Dispersion—rainbow colors that appear halogen, or incandescent light will not
to turn on and off on tilt or movement of give a good view of brilliance.
the head. Dispersion colors should be
visible in some of the scintillation For evaluating scintillation and
flashes in rough capable of displaying dispersion, a point-source overhead
dispersion. We may see some dispersion halogen or incandescent light or an LED
in a few designs in lower R.I. gems. or incandescent penlight are best.
Ideally we’d want to see flashes of Chandelier lighting will make superior
dispersion distributed over the whole gems stand out from lesser gems.
crown facet area. The best designs will Distributed overhead lighting, like what
also display some color flashes in the we have in our OMSI meeting room, is
table area. In lesser designs, color second best for viewing dispersion and
flashes will be limited to stone edges or scintillation. Neither feature is
corners. Undesirable patterns—minimal noticeable with diffuse lighting.
to no dispersion when it should be
present. Flashes that are too small will This brings us to Pathway 2: Expanding
merge to white light. your Inner Design Guru’s knowledge
base about how designs create gemstone
To evaluate, we’ll use the figure eight beauty.
rocking motion. We’ll be evaluating for
distribution, size, and amount color Design Structure is the key. On
flashes. Pathway 1, we noted that light structure
creates the beauty we see. On Pathway
What follows are the lighting conditions 2, we’ll see how a well-constructed
required for evaluating brilliance, design generates brilliance, scintillation,
scintillation, and dispersion. Unless you and dispersion, our creators of gemstone
use the correct lighting conditions for beauty. And the GemCad diagram is our
viewing these features, you may not get best aid for understanding the role of
an accurate impression of your design. Having said that, I haven’t yet
gemstone’s beauty. met anyone who can look at a GemCad
diagram and always pick out the
For brilliance we need diffuse, indirect Smokin’ Stones and avoid the Fish Tank
lighting. Best light, daytime—indirect Duds. But we needn’t fret, for the
outdoor light, your back to source, knowledgeable Design Guru has a better
gemstone at eye level. Best light, chance of making the right pick most of
anytime—under table top indirect the time. And to have a better chance
lighting. Though not indirect, the diffuse making the right pick, we need to know
lighting from a 4 foot fluorescent shop what design features to look for.

64
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Let’s take a moment to review a few Let’s get specific about what we look
points about facet function. The table for in our GemCad diagrams. Simpler
acts like a light collector for both reflection patterns are likely when
incoming and outgoing light paths. crown breaks and mains are directly
Crown facets structure and direct the over pavilion breaks and mains with
light entering and exiting the gemstone. only pavilion main facet junctions
Pavilion facets act as little mirrors, visible through the table. The size of
directing light paths through the reflections will usually be nearly the
gemstone. Placement and angles of same size as our actual facets. Because
crown and pavilion facets have a major these reflections are smaller than our
role in creating our better light patterns. real facets, we call them virtual facets.
However, the pavilion facet junctions,
by splitting light into multiple pathways, Petal Cut, Datavue file 01.436A (Fig.
do more to create brilliance, 1, 2) with 49 facets, is an example of
scintillation, dispersion, and gemstone this pattern. With hidden lines turned
beauty than any other single feature. on, we can see that crown main and
This means that the best clues for break facets are directly over pavilion
picking designs for Smokin’ Stones will main and break facets. The GemRay
come from observations about the image shows a very simple reflection
placement and angles of crown and pattern with large virtual facets and an
pavilion facets and the location of almost unlit table area. This design
pavilion facet junctions. would only work with 4 to 6 mm
stones.

Fig 1 Fig 2 Fig 3 Fig 4

65
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Notice what happens in Petal Cut, facets to be smaller than those in our
revised, (Fig. 3 and 4) when we change first case. Novice Cushion Triangle
the placement and length of the (Fig. 5, 6) by Robert Strickland, with
pavilion break facets, and the angle of 31 facets is an example of this pattern.
the P and C mains. This similar design With 18 fewer facets than Petal Cut, it
pattern generates an entirely different displays a complex, well-distributed
reflection pattern. This version would reflection pattern with small virtual
work well with 8 mm stones. facets. You can see why. There are
multiple pavilion facet junctions in the
Complex reflection patterns are likely table area. The crown mains and some
when pavilion facet junctions are of the other crown facets are over
located under crown facets and more pavilion facet junctions. This simple
than just P main facet junctions are design, with fewer facets, would work
located under the table. Because of well with 10 to 12 mm stones.
their location, the facet junctions split
up light paths creating more virtual
facets. And we’d expect the virtual

Fig. 5 Fig. 6

Here’s the take-away from what we just illustrated with these three designs - Size
Really Does Matter.

The size our virtual facets depends on smaller stones. A complex structure
how our design is structured. The will usually create a greater number of
location of pavilion facet junctions smaller virtual facets. Smaller virtual
under crown and table facets has the facets work better for larger stones
biggest influence on the size and
number of virtual facets. Facet What about the idea that larger
placement, angle, and facet length gemstones require a larger number of
have an important, but lesser influence facets to have a beautiful reflection
on virtual facet number and size. A pattern? True, in general. But virtual
simple design structure will usually facet size has to be right for stone size.
create larger and fewer virtual facets. More real facets usually mean more
Larger virtual facets work better for virtual facets. However, remember, a

66
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

design with more facets may have less midsaturated rough. Avoid Portuguese
or more virtual facets than expected or barion type designs. If rough is on
due to design structure. The virtual the margin of the white paper test, use
facet size in GemRay face-up images designs with pavilion mains at or
will help you finalize your decision below the critical angle.
when picking a design to match gem
size Color with lightly saturated rough can
be darkened with deeper designs. For
Let’s not forget the contribution that the example, alternating step-cut pavilions
critical angle makes to design structure. or deep brilliant designs like barion
and retro-reflector types. These
I’d like you to think of our January designs have longer, more complex
lecture as an important part of our light paths and are more brilliant than
current discussion. (See March 2016 the traditional emerald step cut. One
issue of FACETS.– ed) cautionary note: brilliant designs may
tend to wash out very lightly saturated
Let’s move on to specific features that color.
have an impact on gemstone beauty.
First up, let’s consider color. Cutting For lightly saturated rough, the
for color requires some thoughtful emerald cut is the still the gold
design selection. standard for deepening color. Stone
depth can be varied to match
Mid to highly saturated rough requires saturation. (Fig. 7) Here Vargas gives
shallower designs. Don’t use anything us some emerald cut options for rough
deeper than an SRB (Total of various levels of saturation. The
Height/W=0.62.) SRBs, other brilliant rectangle is better than the square
cuts, and designs with keel-type because color saturation increases with
pavilions will usually work for a longer light path.

67
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Fig 7. Fig. 9

Fig. 8

Fig. 7 Fig. 9

Think outside the box when cutting lighter and darker saturated rough. This design (Fig.
8 and 9) was cut by Jerry Bartlemay from thin sunstone rough that was red in the center
face-up and red when viewed on edge. Crown facets of 35 degrees with pavilion facets of
45 degrees created a startling red border. This design (Fig. 10, 11, and 12) was cut from
very darkly saturated rough with P mains below the critical angle. The fan cut design
gives surface sparkle when little is expected from internal reflections.

Fig. 10 Fig. 11 Fig. 12

In this next section we’ll discuss structures and design types that favor brilliance,
scintillation, and dispersion. Design options that increase brilliance:

68
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

1. Lower crown main angles. Below 25 degrees brilliance increases further but
reflections become less interesting, flatter, and more mirror-like.
2. Larger table size. 60% is optimal. 75% max.
3. Cutting the table perpendicular to the C-axis. More brilliant for two reasons—The
C-axis has a higher
R.I. and the light is not polarized. The C axis, using quartz as our example, is the
long crystal axis.
4. More complex designs.

Design options that increase dispersion:

1. Higher crown main angles up to 45 degrees.
2. Smaller table size down to 50%.
3. Larger star facets (50% instead of 33%)
4. More complex designs

Here are some examples of design types that increase opportunity for brilliance,
scintillation, and dispersion. Anything that increases the length and complexity of light
paths will increase all three features.

1. Increase break (girdle) facet length to 80%. Increases brilliance by 10%. Both of
these versions have P main angles of 43 degrees. Fig. 13 and 14 has P breaks of
50% with a 2.7 degree difference between breaks and mains. Fig. 15 and 16 has P
breaks of 80% with a 1 degree difference between breaks and mains. Notice what
happens to the GemRay images for each design.

Fig. 13 Fig.14 Fig. 15 Fig. 16

2. Step cut crown with a brilliant cut pavilion. Compare a standard brilliant cut oval
(Fig. 17 and 18) with the same pavilion with a step cut crown. (Fig. 19 and 20)
This design Increases brilliance in longer L/ W designs by 10%. The step-cut
crown does a better job of light handling than a brilliant cut crown. That’s
because brilliant cut crown facets are usually shallower on the ends and steeper

69
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

on the sides while the step-cut crown uses uniform facet angles.

Fig.17 Fig. 18 Fig 19 Fig 20

3. Brilliant cut crown with a staggered step-cut pavilion. (Fig. 21 and 22) Except for
Portuguese type round cuts, staggered step-cut pavilions are underutilized by the
average faceter. We see a lot more pavilions like this coming from the native
cutters.

Fig. 21 Fig. 22 Fig. 23 Fig. 24

4. Odd symmetry—causes these gems to explode with scintillation. And they are at
least as bright, or brighter than even symmetry stones. (Fig. 23and 24)
5. Unstacked mains. (Fig. 25 and 26 ) Notice that the C mains are over the P breaks,
not over the P mains as they would be in a stacked main design.
6. Vertically split mains with a brilliant cut crown. (Fig. 27 and 28)

Fig. 25 Fig. 26 Fig. 27 Fig. 28

70
11
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Parting Shots:

I hope you’ve been impressed with

GemRay images in our illustrations. I Edward A Danbom, “Some ‘New’ Angles
consider GemRay to be the faceter’s on Faceting,” Gems & Gemology, Fall
second best friend, after GemCad. It 1978, p, 88-91.
displays fab simulations of a gemstone’s
appearance. It’s one more tool for Al Gilbertson, “Optimizing Face-up
picking Smokin’ Stones and avoiding Appearance in Colored Gemstone
Fish Tank Duds. You can download it Faceting,” Gems & Gemology, Summer,
from [Link] for only 2013, Vol. 49, No. 2, 15 pages.
$45—worth its weight in gold.
Multiple authors in forum posts, “Fire
Do GemRay images compare to real and Dispersion Techy Help Please,”
life? Definitely. You can prove this for Rockytalk on [Link], Sept. 5-9,
yourself. View your cut gem under a 2004, and Nov. 1-4, 2010.
round 8-inch fluorescent magnifier
lamp. Find the sharpest focus point Sasian, et. al., “Evaluation of brilliance,
farthest from the magnifying lens. fire, and scintillation in round brilliant
Compare the view with a GemRay face- gemstones,” Optical Engineering, Sept.
up random model image. You will find 2007, Vol. 46, No. 9, 093604-1-25.
that the two images look exactly alike.
Sasian, et. al., “The Optical
I hope this overview has energized your Design of Gemstones,” Optics
Inner Gemstone Fashionista for fun and Photonics News, April,
gemstone viewing. And for those so 2003, p. 25-29. Jim Perkins,
inclined, may your Inner Gemstone “Quartz: Improving Optical
Design Guru find more kick for the pick. Performance,” Rock & Gem, Jan,
And may all your gems be Smokin’ 2007, p. 88, 89
Stones. Glenn and Martha Vargas, “Faceting for
Amateurs”, p, 93.
References for this program:

71
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

USFG Advertising Policies

The USFG Board is currently discussing, documenting, and voting on new advertising
polices for the USFG. We look forward to announcing and implementing these polices.
Please watch for the advertising policy announcement on our website.

Just a reminder

To enable you to take full advantage of your membership benefits we may occasionally
need to send special notices regarding proposed changes or other Guild business. Please be
sure to notify us of any changes to your email address.

72
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

The USFG Newsletter is a quarterly damage to, any person, group, product,
publication of the United States Faceters manufacturer or commercial company.
Guild, published in March, June,
September and December. It is available Newsletter Submissions
on the USFG website, to all paid Correspondence concerning the content of
members of the Guild. Membership dues the newsletter should be sent to the editor.
are an incredibly reasonable $18 per year Items submitted for publication in the
(USD) and are payable to the USFG newsletter should be sent to the editor as
Treasurer. well. The e-mail address for the editor is:
editor@[Link]
Please help us grow the organization by
recommending membership in the USFG We’re always looking for new ideas and
to fellow faceters. contributions to the content of the
newsletter, so if you would like to make a
Opinions expressed are those of the suggestion or a submission, please e-mail
editor, contributing members, or quoted the editor.
authors, and do not necessarily represent
the United States Faceters Guild or its Please try to submit newsletter items no
membership. later than the 5th of the month preceding
the quarterly newsletter publication date,
The newsletter is for the express purpose i.e. February 5, May 5, August 5 and
of sharing information with the members November 5.
and other faceting guilds, and has no
intent to show preference to, or cause

73
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

Officers 2016 Advisory Committee

President: Tom Maxwell Lorne Grossman
Vice President: Diane Eames Michiko Huynh
Secretary: Jenny Clark L. Bruce Jones
Treasurer: Sue Lichtenberger Charles Moon
Paul Newman
Board of Directors Jeff White
Al Balmer Will Smith
Arya Akhavan
Dan Lynch Appointed Staff
Diane Eames Membership: Jenny Clark
Ernie Hawes Historian: Glenn Klein
Jon Rolfe Editor: Mark Oros
Sue Lichtenberger Assistant Editor: Glenn Wood
Tom Maxwell Assistant Editor: Adam Pollack
Tom Mitchell

Alexander Wolkonsky Charles Moon Cal Thomas

Glenn Klein Jean A. Marr Austin McThorn
Ralph Mathewson Sylvia Czayo (d) Everett G. Brake
Billy Stringfellow (d) Don Dunn (d) Jenny Clark
Jack Gross John Bayer Jerry Newman
Richard Golden William Wilkie Jack B. Lewis
Brian Maxwell Dr. Vincent Bishop John Maine
James Clarke John Cassity Ed Romack (d)
Robert Long Juris Peterson Verner Tovrea

74
UNITED STATES FACTERS GUILD NEWSLETTER VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, SEPTEMBER 2016

New Members - Go to the USFG website to become a new member

[Link]

Renewing Members - Your membership expiration date and the button to renew your
membership can be found at the My Account/Subscriptions web page once you login to
the website. You will receive an email reminding you to renew your membership one
week before your membership expires.

Questions about your membership can be sent to: membership@[Link]

75