Lecture 6: First-Order Reliability Method
Lecture #6
Outline
• First-Order Reliability Method (FORM)
• Transformation from X-Space to U-Space
• Reliability Index and Most Probable Point (MPP)
• Reliability Estimation Error by FORM
• Iterative Search of MPP
2
First-Order Reliability Method
Recall from Lecture #5: Expansion Methods
The first-order Taylor series expansion of G(X) at the mean value
G ( X) ≈ G (μX ) +
(
N ∂G μ
X)
i =1 ∂X i
(
X i − µ Xi )
= a1 X 1 + ⋯ + aN X N + b
or G(X) = aTX + b, where a = [a1, a2,…, aN]T contains the first-order
partial derivatives of G with respect to X.
The first-order approximate mean and variance of G
µG = E [G ] ≈ E aT X + b = aTμ X + b σ G2 = aT Σ Xa
Assuming G is normal, the reliability can be estimated as
µG
R = Φ −
Gσ
3
First-Order Reliability Method
Recall from Lecture #5: Expansion Methods
Potential drawbacks of expansion methods:
Only utilize the first two statistical moments of X while ignoring the
distribution information of these variables;
Uses the mean point of X as the reference point for building a linear or
quadratic approximation of G(X), which may lead to a large error in
estimating a high reliability (or a low probability of failure).
As an attempt to overcome these drawbacks, Hasofer and Lind
proposed the FORM.
The basic idea of FORM is to linearize G(U) at the most probable
(failure) point (MPP) on the limit state function (LSF) G(U) = 0 in
the U-space.
The U-space is composed of independent standard normal
variables U that are transformed from X.
4
First-Order Reliability Method
Transformation from X-Space to U-Space
For a normal random variable Xi with mean μXi and standard
deviation σXi, transformation T can be simply defined as
X − µ Xi
Ui = T ( X i ) = , i = 1,2,..., N
σX i
In a general case, the transformation uses the CDF mapping
FXi ( X i ) = Φ (Ui )
where FXi and Φ are the CDFs of Xi and Ui, respectively.
5
First-Order Reliability Method
Transformation from X-Space to U-Space
Transformation of a standard uniform random variable Xi to a
standard normal random variable Ui
1.0 1.0
0.8 CDF mapping 0.8
0.6 0.6
ΦU i(ui)
FXi(xi)
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
ui Ui xi Xi
0.9
1.0
0.6
fU i(ui)
fX i (xi)
0.3
0 00
0 ui Ui xi 1 Xi
6
First-Order Reliability Method
Transformation from X-Space to U-Space
Through the transformation, G(X) in the X-space is mapped to an
equivalent function G(U) = G(T(X)) in the U-space.
G(U) > 0
U2
X2
G(X) > 0 Failure region
Failure region
G(X) ≤ 0 G(X) = 0
Safe region Failure surface
fX(x)
G(U) ≤ 0
Safe region
Mean point
X1 0 U1
0
G(U) = 0
fU(u) Failure surface
7
First-Order Reliability Method
Most Probable Point (MPP) and Reliability Index
In the U-space, the MPP u* denotes the point on the failure
surface which has the minimum distance to the origin.
G(U) > 0
U2
X2
G(X) > 0 Failure region
Failure region
G(X) ≤ 0 G(X) = 0
Safe region Failure surface
fX(x)
G(U) ≤ 0
Safe region
MPP u*
Mean point
X1 0 U1
0
G(U) = 0
fU(u) Failure surface
8
First-Order Reliability Method
Most Probable Point (MPP) and Reliability Index
This minimum distance is called the reliability index (β). The
reliability R can be computed as (when R ≥ 0.5): Φ .
G(U) > 0
U2
X2
G(X) > 0 Failure region
Failure region
G(X) ≤ 0 G(X) = 0
Safe region Failure surface
fX(x)
G(U) ≤ 0
Safe region
Reliability
index β
MPP u*
Mean point
FORM
X1 0 U1
0
G(U) = 0
fU(u) Failure surface
9
First-Order Reliability Method
Most Probable Point (MPP) and Reliability Index
This reliability measure is exact only if the failure surface in the
U-space is of a linear form.
G(U) > 0
U2
X2
G(X) > 0 Failure region
Failure region
G(X) ≤ 0 G(X) = 0 Error
Safe region Failure surface region
fX(x)
G(U) ≤ 0
Safe region
Reliability
index β
MPP u*
Mean point
FORM
X1 0 U1
0
G(U) = 0
fU(u) Failure surface
10
First-Order Reliability Method
Reliability Estimation Error by FORM
Reliability is defined as the following multidimensional integral:
R = f U ( u ) du
ΩS
where Ω denotes the safety region in the U space, and U is
the joint probability density function (PDF) of U.
FORM approximates the LSF with a linear function. The reliability
estimate by FORM can then be expressed as:
?
R ≈ ˆ S f U ( u ) du Φ( β )
ΩFORM
Since U is symmetric around the origin, we can rotate the
axes from [ , ] to [ , ] while keeping the same joint PDF.
R ≈ ˆ S f U ' ( u ') du '
ΩFORM
11
First-Order Reliability Method
Reliability Estimation Error by FORM
This reliability measure, Φ , is exact only if the failure
surface in the U-space is of a linear form.
?
U2
ˆS
Ω FORM
f U ( u ) du Φ( β )
Ω
MPP u*
FORM
0 U1
G(U) = 0
fU(u) Failure surface
12
First-Order Reliability Method
Reliability Estimation Error by FORM
Note that input variables [ , ] follow independent standard
normal distributions. It then follows that:
R = ˆ S fU1′ ( u1′ ) fU 2′ ( u2′ ) du1′du2′
ΩFORM
where Ω , , ∈ ∞, ∞ .
The above integral can be further derived as:
β +∞
R≈ fU1′ ( u1′ ) du1′ ⋅ fU 2′ ( u2′ ) du2′
−∞ −∞
Standard Full area
normal CDF Φ ( β )
1
under PDF
FORM uses a linear approximation of the LSF for reliability
estimation and the estimation error is due to this approximation.
13
First-Order Reliability Method
Iterative Search of MPP
The task of MPP search can be formulated as an optimization
problem with one equality constraint in the U-space
Minimize U
Subject to G ( U) = 0
where the optimum point on the failure surface is the MPP u*.
The MPP search generally requires an iterative optimization
scheme based on the gradient information of G(U).
14
First-Order Reliability Method
Iterative Search of MPP
Hasofer-Lind and Rackwitz-Fiessler (HL-RF) method
Step 1: Set the number of iterations k = 0 and the initial MPP estimate u = u(0)
that corresponds to the mean values of X..
Step 2: Transform u(k) to x(k) using CDF mapping. Compute the performance
function G(u(k)) = G(x(k)) and its partial derivatives in the U-space as
∂G ∂G ∂G
( )
∇UG u( k ) =
∂
1U
,
∂U 2
,…,
∂U
N U=u( k )
Step 3: Update the search point at the current iteration as
Steepest ascent direction
u ( k +1)
= u( ) • n( ) −
k k
G( )
u(k)
n( k ) (
∇UG u( k ) )
(k)
( )
∇UG u( )
k
n =
∇ G ( u( ) )
U
k
Step 4: Repeat Steps 2 and 3 until the convergence of u.
15
First-Order Reliability Method
Iterative Search of MPP
Schematic of MPP search with the HL-RF method
U2
G(U) > 0
Failure region
u(0)
u(1)
( ))
G u(
0
G(U) ≤ 0
∇ G ( u( ) )
0
Safe region U
MPP u*
n(0)
G(U) = G(u(0)) > 0
0 U1
G(U) = 0
Failure surface
16
First-Order Reliability Method
Example on MPP Search
Consider the following performance function
80
G ( X1 , X 2 ) = 1 −
X12 + 8 X 2 + 5
where X1 and X2 each follow a normal distribution with the mean
4 and the standard deviation 0.6. Find the MPP using HL-RF.
Solution
The first iteration in the HL-RF method is detailed as follows:
Step 1: Set the number of iterations k = 0 and the initial values u = (0,0).
Step 2: Transform u(0) to x(0). x(0) = (4,4). Compute G(X) at x(0) as
80
G ( X1, X 2 ) = 1 − ≈ −0.5049
X12 + 8 X 2 + 5
and the partial derivatives as:
∂G ∂G ∂X1 160 X1σ X1 ∂G ∂G ∂X 2
= = 2
≈ 0.1367, = ≈ 0.1367
∂U1 ∂X1 ∂U1 ( X 2 + 8 X + 5) ∂U 2 ∂X 2 ∂U 2
1 2
17
First-Order Reliability Method
Example on MPP Search
Solution
Step 3: Update the search point at the current iteration as
( ) ∇UG u( )
0
1
0
( ) ( )
u( ) = u( ) • ∇UG u( ) − G u( )
0 0
2
∇ G ( u( ) )
0
U
= ( 0,0) • ( 0.1367,0.1367 ) − ( −0.5094)
( 0.1367,0.1367 ) ≈ (1.8633,1.8633)
0.13672 + 0.13672
Iteration history for MPP search
∂G ∂G
Iteration U1 U2 β G( U)
∂U1 ∂U 2
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.5094 0.1367 0.1367
1 1.8633 1.8633 2.6351 -0.1090 0.0944 0.0738
2 2.7774 2.1707 3.5251 -0.0059 0.0860 0.0607
3 2.9225 2.0630 3.5772 0.0001 0.0863 0.0600
4 2.9366 2.0416 3.5766 0.0000 0.0864 0.0600
Optimum 2.9366 2.0416 3.5766 0.0000 0.0864 0.0600
18