1

Table of Contents

Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5

Atrocity tales .......................................................................................................................................8

2. Hate literature ............................................................................................................................... 9

3. Framing ........................................................................................................................................... 10

4. Flooding the Media .......................................................................................................................11

5. Changing Your Values ................................................................................................................. 12

6. Hit Pieces ........................................................................................................................................ 13

7. Confusion of Information ............................................................................................................ 15

8. Fake NGOs ...................................................................................................................................... 16

9. Fact-Checking................................................................................................................................. 17

10. Too much of the story known in advance ............................................................................. 18

11. Negative and Unpleasant Emotions ....................................................................................... 19

12. Opinion-based articles . . . ......................................................................................................... 20

13. Things that Just Don’t Make Sense ......................................................................................... 21

14. Censorship ..................................................................................................................................... 22

15. Pablum for the Masses ............................................................................................................... 23

16. Polls ................................................................................................................................................ 24

17. You don’t know what you don’t know .................................................................................... 25

18. Propaganda Success ................................................................................................................... 26

Notes ..................................................................................................................................................... 27

.............................................................................................................. 29

Beijing's Bite of the Apple ............................................................................................................... 31

Alibaba - Almost as big as China .................................................................................................. 32

US Trade Deficits .............................................................................................................................. 33

Criminals in Need of Protection.................................................................................................... 35

2
OSI .........................................................................................................................................................36

Consumer Fraud? Just Do it! .......................................................................................................... 38

GSK ....................................................................................................................................................... 41

Bottling Coke and Spilling Blood .................................................................................................. 43

Vaccinations against Pregnancy ................................................................................................. 44

Notes .................................................................................................................................................... 47

................................................................................. 49

Notes .....................................................................................................................................................56

................................................................................................................. 58

UK Foot and Mouth Disease.......................................................................................................... 61

China's "Pork Speculators" .............................................................................................................. 62

Let's Look at SARS ............................................................................................................................63

Let's Look at MERS ...........................................................................................................................65

Let's Look at ZIKA ........................................................................................................................... 66

Beijing COVID-19 .............................................................................................................................. 68

China COVID-19 ................................................................................................................................ 70

China's 6 Bio-attacks......................................................................................................................... 72

Notes ..................................................................................................................................................... 73

............................................................................................................................... 74

Cropping, Cutting and Pasting ...................................................................................................... 75

China’s Jasmine Revolution ........................................................................................................... 80

A Lie of Omission is still a Lie ....................................................................................................... 84

China: Bullying to Prosperity ........................................................................................................ 85

China Imprisons yet another Human Rights Lawyer .............................................................87

Canada’s two Michaels: Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor ............................................ 88

Notes .................................................................................................................................................... 90

Censorship, or Burning the History Books.................................................................................. 91

3
David meets Godzilla ...................................................................................................................... 92

James Bacque .....................................................................................................................................93

Ernst Zundel ...................................................................................................................................... 94

Professor Tony Hall ..........................................................................................................................95

Carroll Quigley .................................................................................................................................. 96

David Irving ..................................................................................................................................... 97

Let's Burn all the History Books ................................................................................................. 100

Notes ................................................................................................................................................... 105

...................................................................................................................................... 107

The Fact-Checking Industry .......................................................................................................... 111

...................................................................................... 115

Group Therapy ................................................................................................................................. 118

Unidentifiable lumps of flesh ........................................................................................................121

“Information Control” .................................................................................................................... 122

Pat Tillman ....................................................................................................................................... 124

Bug Splats and Crispy Critters .................................................................................................... 125

Bug Splat ........................................................................................................................................... 125

Crispy Critters .................................................................................................................................. 126

Now, the “WHY?”............................................................................................................................ 127

Epilogue ............................................................................................................................................. 128

Notes ................................................................................................................................................... 129

............................................................................................................................... 132

....................................................................................................................... 134

....................................................................................................... 135

4
Introduction

Note to Readers:

For a period of about ten years, I operated a website of

political commentary that contained thousands of
articles, many of which were content from various
media, but many being my own work. That website
experienced occasional but persistent DDOS and other
attacks by forces unknown.

Some years ago, I published on that website a three-

page article on the Western media similar in content to
the media series I am presenting here. Of all my written
work, only this one article was under constant attack.
Most often, the pages wouldn’t load properly, preventing
readers from seeing the full contents and preventing
them from clicking through to the following pages. It was
clear I had attracted the attention of someone who
preferred to not have this information in the public
realm.

5
A short while ago, I wrote an article titled, A Search for Truth and Understanding. It provides
an excellent lead-in to this series and I suggest you read it. It isn’t long. (1)

When I arrived in China the news reporting format was one of the first things to draw my
attention. There was something different, unusual; the reporting seemed somehow stilted, a
bit dry or reserved, perhaps cautious. Reserve and caution are of course Chinese tradition,
but I had difficulty assessing it. My first thought was that perhaps the government controlled
not only content but method – the way news was reported.

But it slowly dawned on me that the unusual aspect was simply that I was seeing news without
commentary – a simple chronology of events. I had become so inured to the rampant opinion-
based journalism in North America that the absence of this in China made articles seem
somehow barren and empty. But they weren’t empty of news; they were empty of the opinions,
biases, propaganda, conjectures and moral judgments that in the West are always inextricably
mixed with fact. Looking at most Western newspapers today, and certainly on topics related to
politics, capitalism, religion or US imperialism, seemingly every article contains 3 facts, 4
conjectures, 2 false hypotheses, 6 moral judgments, 12 baseless opinions and at least 6
unfounded accusations, all following a coherent agenda. It is impossible to find honest
reporting in America’s mainstream media today – and indeed in all the Western media,
the reported “news” being little more than an ideology surge, journalism having openly become
nothing more than perception management for imperialism or political power.

The US and Canada, and primarily all English-speaking countries, once had factual news
reporting. But with competition for readers or viewers, the media began adding what they called
‘color’ to the news, additional information intended to make a news story more interesting,
reporting for e.g., that someone in the news had a son who was an Olympic athlete; not related
directly to the story, but adding human interest. The trouble with color is that there isn’t very
much of it, and the media wasted no time replacing it with commentary, essentially
editorialising news with ideological viewpoints.

Of course, the Western governments and the media were well-versed in Bernays’ clandestine
propaganda theories, but by the 1980s ‘clandestine’ was no longer operative and even subtlety
had been abandoned, ideology being not only ubiquitous but in the open. With the English
media today, there is no longer any separation of fact and opinion. This is so true that many
articles contain no news other than an oblique reference to some past event, and consist
entirely of ideological editorialising, in fact heavily biased op-ed pieces providing primarily a
political interpretation the elites want us to adopt, creating abuses of every description.
Americans, Canadians, Brits and Aussies have now for two generations been exposed to this
deceitful reporting and are no longer aware of the extensive propagandising even though it no
longer remains hidden.

As someone wrote so accurately: “Traditional journalistic news room culture determines the
basic nature of a story before the facts are assembled.”

6
“A young reporter writes an expose, but the editor says, “I don’t think we’re going to run that.”
The second time the reporter goes to her editor, the editor says, “I don’t think that’s a good
idea.” She doesn’t research and write the story. The third time the reporter has an idea. But
she doesn’t go to her editor. The fourth time she doesn’t get the idea.” – Nicholas Johnson,
former FCC commissioner (2)

It is true that we now have a daily stream of fabricated news. Some of it is completely fabricated
in the sense that there was no newsworthy event that occurred, but where a few small facts
from a topic of current interest are used to provide an excuse for political editorials. Most of it
is driven by a political/capitalist ideology promulgated with a startling lack of regard for truth,
using badly twisted interpretations of a few facts to spin an entirely false story. Journalistic
integrity has all but disappeared from the Western countries. And indeed it is much worse than
this, because a great deal of our “news” is in reality totally fabricated, with the requisite faked
video and audio, misleading headlines, twisted information and bald outright lies. I am referring
here to actual fabricated concoctions – invented ‘news’ – things that never happened, or that
didn’t occur at all in the way they are presented. And we aren’t talking about ‘color’ or ‘bias’
here; we’re speaking of actually fabricating an event and making firm statements that are
knowingly false. I will provide some typical – and outrageous – examples. You can begin with
this story of Jessica Lynch and another of Osama bin Laden. (3) (4)

For most of us, it seems incredible that a news story could possibly be a fiction. We are
apparently unable to accept that our government and media would actually lie. But lie, they
do. Several years ago, CNN was sued by one of their news anchors for being ordered to lie in
the newscasts. CNN won the case. They did not deny ordering the news anchor to lie. Their
defense was based simply on the position that American news media have “no obligation to tell
the truth”. In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion
by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States.
FOX asserted that there were no written rules against distorting news in the media, arguing
that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters have the right to lie or deliberately distort news
reports on public airwaves. Fox attorneys did not dispute a news anchor’s claim that they
pressured her to broadcast a false story; they simply maintained that it was their right to do
so. (5) In these cases, and in others, the position of the US courts implied that First Amendment
rights belong to the few individuals who own and/or control the entire media landscape, a kind
of shield protecting their vast propagandising campaign.

We have come to the point where Western media are practicing a kind of psychological warfare.
“We all know that our State Department, the Pentagon, and the White House have brazenly
proclaimed that they have the right and the power to manage the news, to tell us not the truth
but what they want us to believe.” – Myron Fagan (6)

This is a large and complex topic, but let’s begin with something simple. Since we are indeed
being propagandised by our own media on a daily basis, how do we recognise what is happening
to us? How do we distinguish propaganda? How do we separate truth from lies? What are
the main things to look for?

7
 Atrocity tales

The first is what some people today call “atrocity porn”, in fact violent pornographic tales of
events that have never occurred. For this, you can recall my comments in an earlier Propaganda
article on the recommendations of Bernays and Lippman that the best way to create hate
and anger towards a people is to fabricate atrocity tales. The Germans having tubs full of Jewish
eyeballs, of using Jewish fat to make soap and industrial lubricants, of skewering babies and
raping nuns. (7) We progressed to Saddam Hussein having WMDs ready to launch, his using
wood shredders to eliminate his political opponents, of gassing millions of Kurds and burying
them in mass graves, of his soldiers tossing babies out of incubators. We had Khadaffi issuing
Viagra to his soldiers, enabling them to rape more women. And we had “proof” of this, in the
woman who did a survey (during a war) of abused women. 1,300 questionnaires sent out,
1,200 returned and all 1,200 women claimed to have been raped. When the Red Cross and
Human Rights Watch tracked down the woman and asked to interview some of the victims, well
the woman had unfortunately “lost touch” with all of them. After all, there’s a war on. We had
Bashar al-Assad in Syria gassing his people with chlorine. In the end, no evidence – no
evidence – was ever discovered to substantiate any of these claims, but it was too late; the
countries had already been attacked and destroyed.

Today we have the ‘genocide’ in China’s Xinjiang, the ‘concentration camps’ imprisoning
millions in forced labor, and with unlimited forced sterilisations, the forced extermination of the
Uigur language, the destruction of Moslem temples and graveyards and much more. In fact,
the only thing happening in Xinjiang is the Chinese government’s astonishing success in de-
radicalising hundreds of thousands of (Western-trained) potential terrorists, replacing religious
extremism with gainful employment. We have “proof” that COVID-19 escaped from a
Chinese lab. Again, no evidence has ever been presented to substantiate any of these claims;
as always, idle claims are equated to evidence.
8
 2. Hate literature

Almost without exception, anything leading you to form a negative opinion of (usually) a
country or its people, is propaganda, normally to build support for outrageous political action
or in preparation for the next war. You need think only of the constant stream of negative news
items about Russia, China, Iran, Cuba, formerly Iraq and Libya, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba . . . To
the extent possible, atrocity tales (1) are part of this media onslaught.

9
 3. Framing

Hong Kong’s terrorists are defined in the media as “democracy protestors”, pouring gasoline on a man
and set him on fire. Source

This is one of the more insidious tools of propaganda – instructing us ‘how to think’ about a
particular event. The invasion and destruction of Iraq were termed by the military and in the
media as “Operation Iraqi Freedom”. People who are genuinely concerned about contamination
and dangerous side-effects of vaccines are termed “Vaccination terrorists”. When Radio Free
Europe started broadcasting its lies about the East in 1950, people were asked to donate “truth
dollars” to fight communism, a bit like sending “freedom fighters” to Libya and Syria.

As George Carlin said, “If fire fighters fight fires, what do America’s freedom fighters fight?”
Hong Kong’s terrorists are defined in the media as “democracy protestors” – who, in one
university lab alone, had created more than 10,000 petrol bombs which were used on
government buildings and police stations (and on the police themselves), and who poured
gasoline on a man and set him on fire. (8) In all these cases, the first step is to provide a
useful propaganda definition which, if adopted by the public, eliminates independent thought
in one swoop.

10
 4. Flooding the Media

If you think back to recent world events, even very major items like the destruction of Japan’s
Fukushima reactor and the leakage of vast amounts of radioactivity into the Pacific, grab the
headlines for only a short time, then disappear. Most events are ‘news’ for only a day or two.
But whenever we see an item recurring repeatedly in the media for weeks and months, and
even sometimes for years, this is a 100% sign that we are being propagandised and that the
media flow will not cease until polls tell our masters that a majority of the population has
accepted the position being promoted or that the political pressure has achieved its desired
result.

One such occurrence was the exchange value of China’s RMB. You may recall that when Japan
was in a competitive position similar to China 40 years ago, the US forced the Plaza Accord
onto Japan, revaluing the currency upward by nearly 300%, destroying the economy and
eliminating Japan as a contender. The same was planned for China, led by Paul Krugman, the
NYT’s Renminbi Rambo, screaming that China needed to revalue its currency by “at least 25%
to 40%”. These stories of ‘China cheating’ on its currency and the necessary 40% revaluation
occurring at least weekly in the Western media and the US Congress for perhaps ten years. But
in fact, China’s currency had always traded in an appropriate range, as has been proven by
subsequent events, and the Chinese government did not bow to the media and political
pressure.

Today’s stories of China’s Xinjiang, yesterday’s stories of the ‘horrors’ of ZIKA, and more. One
of the more noticeable of these is the new religion of “sexual preferences” which has been
hyped in the media non-stop to the extent that few politicians would have the courage (or the
death wish) to refuse participation in a Gay Pride parade. The power of propaganda. (9)

China’s Huawei is another such item, garnering far more media attention than an actual
circumstance would require, and with good reason. Huawei has been in the US, Canada, and
many other nations during G1, G2, G3 and G4, and never a hint of a suggestion of espionage

11
or any threat to ‘national security’, so what happened suddenly with G5? You may care to read
this, to understand the details. (10)

5. Changing Your Values

President-Elect Biden nominated Dr. Levine for U.S. Asst. Secretary of Health;
Coalition of more than 30 LGBTQ and allied organizations united in defending her confirmation .
Source

Anything suggesting you alter your moral values especially sexual, or on abortion, assisted
death, pornography, immigration, family values, today’s Western white trash. In this category
we have had an enormous volume on all of these topics. I would include here a recent NYT
article freeing corporate executives from responsibility for all crimes including negligent
manslaughter (11) (12), the movie Pretty Woman, and the flood referred to above on our new
sexual perversions presented as “preferences”.

12
 6. Hit Pieces

Whenever you see an author or a publication being trashed in the media, you know there is
something they don’t want you to know. The best is to go there immediately and find out what
that is. Almost invariably, whenever people are being demonised, you know that’s propaganda;
you are being indoctrinated to avoid information they don’t want you to have.

When James Bacque (12) (13) published his historically-surprising works of the millions of
Germans killed in American concentration camps in Europe in the years following the end of
the war, (14) he was bitterly excoriated in the North American media, his research being
derided as “worse than useless” even though he’d relied entirely on US military records and
the introduction to his books was written by a senior US military officer. His work was
denounced as “a deeply-flawed book” (15). Someone didn’t want Americans to know,
while Bacque’s books have been translated into about 15 languages and in Europe he
is widely admired as an historian of consequence.

Tanzania's President John Pombe Magufuli has died, aged 61. Source
13
When the President of Tanzania derided Western vaccines for COVID-19 and claimed Tanzania
would refuse to participate in the global vaccine money-making machine, the UK Guardian
published an astonishing article stating that “this man must be removed” from his office
(16). A short while later, Magufuli mysteriously collapsed on a public stage and was pronounced
dead, the Guardian writing a dozen or more articles celebrating the event. It was a surprise, to
say the least, that the Guardian would have any interest in such a minor person and item.
Magufuli was the same man who denounced the American virus tests, claiming a goat and a
papaya tested positive. (17) (18)

The same is true of Henry Ford’s series of articles on The International Jew. (19) (20) This
has for more than 100 years been denounced in vicious terms as ‘anti-Semitic rants’ but, on
reading them, we are surprised to discover they are no such thing and that Ford in many
instances praised the Jews for their talents. But the articles contain information that some
people don’t want widespread in the public domain and, the best defense being a good offense,
the attacks are intended to pre-empt examination.

14
 7. Confusion of Information

Whenever a media propaganda topic arises and contrary opinions and conclusions are leaking
into the public realm, we invariably see a multitude of articles creating floods of extraneous
information that serve only to create confusion in the public mind and prevent rational thought
and conclusions. Often, this flood of unwelcome information is used to direct public thought in
wrong directions and avoid if possible any focus on the core of the issue. COVID-19 is one
such example, with columnists, apparently medically-qualified, proving that lockdowns are
either useful or a crime against humanity, that masks will either prevent infection or starve you
of oxygen and leave your children brain-dead. Or that the virus originated in either bats or
pangolins or bananas, or frozen salmon, or Fort Detrick or the Wuhan University, or caves in
Sichuan, and that it was unleashed either deliberately, or by accident, or by lab Ph.D’s selling
the diseased animals on the street for coffee money. And at least 100 “facts” to support each
of these claims.

Whenever we are reading about a serious current event and find suddenly multiple opinions
and conclusions by multiple persons all apparently qualified, we know we are suffering a
propaganda attack. It will never occur otherwise.

15
 8. Fake NGOs

Dolkun Isa, president of the World Uyghur Congress, at the National Press Club in Washington, March 7,
2018. (RFA = Radio Free Asia). Source

One common strategy for propagandists when promulgating questionable theories about events
or accusations against a nation, is to produce ‘off-the-shelf’ NGOs with legitimate-sounding
names as the actual author of the accusation or theory in question. So we suddenly see the
“Center for Democratic Transition (CDT)” promoting “honest and accountable
government” somewhere, or vicious trade agreements promoted with the support of the
“Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE) in Washington”.

And of course we have the ‘World Uigur Congress’ in Washington, created by the CIA with
two people, masquerading as the only legitimate world voice of China’s millions of Xinjiang
Uigurs, to say nothing of the “Tibet Government in Exile”, also created by the CIA with two
people and also in Washington.

If you haven’t heard of the organisation before, it very likely did not exist before, and
was created only yesterday to lend a bit of credibility to an otherwise-hapless tale.

16
 9. Fact-Checking

You may (or may not) be surprised to learn that fact-checking is a huge worldwide industry
conceived and created years ago as a powerful censorship tool, and funded with seemingly
unlimited millions of dollars primarily by George Soros, the Gates Foundation, various media
companies, and similar. They were never created to fact-check George Bush’s claims about
Iraq WMDs, but to ‘fact-check’ you and pronounce you false when you disputed Bush’s
claims.

I recently wrote a heavily-documented article on the thesis (now widely-accepted, I believe)

that the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic was not influenza but was instead a bacterial infection
(proven and accepted) the tragic result of a misguided experiment by the Rockefeller Medical
Institute of a meningitis vaccine that began at Fort Riley in the US and spread around the world
not by the soldiers but by Rockefeller itself. (21) Reuters immediately conducted a ‘fact-check’
of the thesis and pronounced it false. Reuter’s evidence? Non-existent, the claim sufficing as
irrefutable proof. (22) Moreover, some of their claims were completely false.

You will be surprised to learn of the tricks these fact-checkers play in producing their results,
and of the actual violations and crimes (civil, at least) they will commit in pursuing their ends.
To my best knowledge, there are no fact-checkers that are not part of this worldwide network.
Some like rely on sites like Snopes, but these have also been co-opted and have now become
part of the propaganda chain, filling in one of the last holes in the highway of lies. As one quick
example of the latter, almost everyone has seen the video of Pompeo stating “We lied, we
cheated, we stole.” Snopes’ fact-check experts tell us it is only “partially true” that Pompeo
said this. In simple terms, whenever any major media outlet claims that something has been
fact-checked, delete this information from your consciousness because it is almost certainly
false.

17
 10. Too much of the story known in advance

CDC IMAGES FOR FACEBOOK/TWITTER.Source

There are many such examples and all should raise an extreme cautionary awareness in
readers. In the event of 9-11, the full story of who, how, and why was flooding the media
the next morning, while in real life there wasn’t even sufficient time to fully realise what had
happened. ZIKA was another such tale, (23) as were the reports of gassings in Syria, replete
with all details which were later proven to have no substantiation.

Source

18
 11. Negative and Unpleasant Emotions

Anything creating a negative emotional response, other than perhaps the story of a tragic death
or similar. Propaganda relies heavily on emotion, often primarily fear and usually of fears you
might not care to discuss openly. It also relies heavily on hate and anger, arousing feelings of
injustice or horrible crimes against populations. The rule is that whenever you find a news item
creating a negative emotional response in yourself, you are almost certainly being deliberately
stuffed with false propaganda.

Think of all the tales of Iran, Libya, Iraq, Syria, Russia, China, so many nations and so
many events, and yet none of those terrible things have ever been substantiated.

19
 12. Opinion-based articles . . .

. . . with a few truths and many lies, articles that provide no detail or omit crucial details. These
may be difficult for you to identify without some research of your own. I will provide some
excellent examples.

20
 13. Things that Just Don’t Make Sense

The two epidemics of UK foot and mouth disease (24) that resulted in the culling of millions of
cattle and bankrupting most small farmers. “Animal Rights Activists” entered the Level-4
Military bio-weapons labs at Pirbright and Porton Down and stole thousands of liters of the
deadly pathogen and spread it throughout the entire country. Alternatively, “a leaky drain” at
Porton Down released a pathogen that killed cattle 500 Kms. distant – and nobody noticed. The
fact that anyone attempting to penetrate a military bio-weapons lab would most likely be shot
dead, was ignored, as were dozens of other facts.

Bing Liu, 37, a researcher at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, was found dead
Saturday inside a home in Ross Township, north of Pittsburgh, the Allegheny County medical
examiner said. Source

“Pork Speculators” in turn obtained thousands of liters of deadly swine flu pathogen and used
small drones to kill several hundred million pigs in China. No explanation as to why they would
do that, nor whether they obtained the pathogen at the nearest 7-11 or at Wal-Mart, and all
the rest. A Chinese scientist in the US announces he is on the verge of a great discovery (25a)
as to the origin of COVID-19, but a day later this happily-married man has an argument with
a gay lover who kills him and commits suicide. Discovery is lost. Two Chinese scientists working
on COVID-19 fired from a government lab in Winnipeg, Canada, (25b)police involved, but no
accusations, no crimes, merely a “procedural issue” which instantly disappears from the media,
meaning they saw something they weren’t meant to see. Chinese medical students taking back
to China samples of some “brown fluid” related to COVID-19, and arrested for ‘smuggling’ –
which is usually a crime of bringing in, not of taking out.

21
 14. Censorship

Propaganda, whether positive or negative, can be undermined if contrary views – or the truth
– can be disseminated to the public at the same time, so media control is vital to eliminate
other views or prevent them from gaining traction. Death is the ultimate censorship.

Ask Gary Webb, the only known example of a man committing suicide by shooting himself in
the head twice.

It isn’t difficult to determine if event coverage is being censored, and you can be very certain
of it when even the social media de-platform you, cite you for ‘fake news’, and Google
suddenly cannot remember who you are.

22
 15. Pablum for the Masses

Source

This is one sure way to know that you are being fed propaganda. An easy example is recurrent
articles in a Canadian newspaper with titles like “What is in the COVID-19 vaccines?” (25c),
articles that omit all the real concerns of real people and provide no information of value, and
which specifically omit mention of aluminum and the female hormones and other
contamination which have been widely-reported to be contained in these.

23
 16. Polls

Interestingly, public polls can tell us much about the agenda underlying various
propaganda campaigns. As one example, the Western media have been flooded for more
than one year with anti-China hate propaganda, centered on the coronavirus but including
much else.(26)

We can almost sense the glee in Gallup or Pew in reporting that assaults against “Asians”
have increased by 793% during the past year, since that was clearly the point of the
propaganda. And this is far from the first time such has occurred; the practice began in
England during the war years. You may care to read this (25).

24
 17. You don’t know what you don’t know

Propaganda does not only involve telling you what to think and how to think, or what not to
think. There is also a huge industry that ensures much news never comes to your attention so
that you don’t think ‘the wrong things’ about the wrong people.

One example: In 2011, a Saudi judge advertised for a doctor to perform spinal surgery on a
man, for the purpose of destroying his spine and leaving him crippled for life. The man had
apparently caused a traffic accident that left another man with a damaged spine and the judge
determined the appropriate punishment was “an eye for an eye”. Did you read about this? No.
It’s not on the agenda.

25
 18. Propaganda Success

Lastly, here are two examples of how successful a propaganda campaign can be, with the power
to have all the media onside and to crush dissenting voices. The first is the story of China’s
great famine in 1959, the story propagated in Western minds attributing the blame to Mao and
being rubbish in entirety. (27).

The second is the real story of China’s Tiananmen Square in 1989, certainly one of the greatest
propaganda victories of all time. (28) The article referenced is considered the definitive work
on this topic, at least in English, though the Internet gatekeepers will not permit many of the
necessary photos to be reproduced on any website. I will cover all these and more in a brief
series of articles on Media Propaganda

26
 Notes

(1) http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1282/
(2) http://www.nicholasjohnson.org/writing/masmedia/
(3) Fake News and “The Naked Government”: Jessica
Lynch
http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/618/
(4) The Death of Osama bin Laden
http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1409/
(5) https://www.projectcensored.org/11-the-media-can-legally-lie/
(6) http://usa-the-republic.com/illuminati/fagan_index.html
(7) Bernays and Propaganda – Part 2 of 5 — The
Marketing of War
http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1582/
(8) https://www.rt.com/news/473115-hong-kong-man-set-on-fire/
(9) Social Change: If Greed is Good, Maybe Smoking is
Gooder
http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1187/
(10) Huawei, Tik-Tok and WeChat
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/08/huawei-tik-tok-and-wechat-august-8-2020.html
(11) https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/business/in-corporate-crimes-individual-accountability-is-
elusive.html

27
(12) https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/15/business/dealbook/theprospects-for-pursuing-corporate-
executives.html
(13) https://www.jamesbacque.com/
(14) https://archive.org/details/CrimesAndMerciesByJamesBacque1997
(15) https://www.positionpapers.ie/2019/06/james-bacques-other-losses-a-deeply-flawed-book/
(16) https://amp.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/feb/08/its-time-for-africa-to-rein-in-
tanzanias-anti-vaxxer-president
(17) https://newspunch.com/tanzanian-president-who-questioned-covid-vaccine-found-dead/
(18) https://www.africanews.com/2021/03/26/tanzania-s-magufuli-laid-to-rest-after-mysterious-death//
(19) https://archive.org/details/TheInternationalJew_655
(20) https://educate-yourself.org/cn/The-International-Jew-Vols1-4-Henry-Ford-645pages.pdf
(21) The 1918 Rockefeller-US Army Worldwide Pandemic
http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1319/
(22) https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-vaccines-caused-1918-influe-idUSKBN21J6X2
(23)
ZIKA: https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/06/larry-romanoff-zika-june-12-2020.html
(24) UK Foot and Mouth Disease
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/06/larry-romanoff-uk-foot-and-mouth.html
(25a)
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/us-chinese-american-researcher-studying-virus-murdered/1831236
(25b)
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/virologists-escorted-out-of-lab-in-canada-66164
(25c) https://globalnews.ca/news/7525406/covid-vaccine-ingredients-pfizer/
(26) The Anger Campaign Against China
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/08/blog-post_49.html
(27) China’s 1959 Famine
http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1369/
(28) Tiananmen Square: The Failure of an
American-instigated 1989 Color Revolution
http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/tiananmen-square-the-failure-of-an-american-instigated-
1989-color-revolution/

28
Much of the US media attention directed to China is unrelated to news in any sense, but is part
of an extensive propaganda program designed to inflict serious discomfort on China's
government, using the political pressure of the media in attempts to force China to
accommodate US and European political and commercial interests. This is often done in
attempts to mitigate the punishment for corporate crimes (especially of corporate executives,
who are virtually immune from criminal prosecution in the US), or to assist an American (or
European) multinational in trashing other countries' consumer and food safety laws. This is not
limited to China; such a media barrage can occur against the best of friends, including Canada,
Germany, France and the UK.

The important point here is that a media flood does not happen by accident. These
circumstances are created by plan, with meetings, discussions, strategies arranged to
create the most discomfort and political pressure, and will almost certainly involve the
corporation, many members of the media, the US Commerce Department and, as often as not,
the intelligence agencies.

29
These people are skilled at mounting a mass media campaign to present their colored version
of events to the Court of Public Opinion, hoping to create sufficient domestic and foreign
pressure to sway a foreign government's position on political, social, and commercial issues.
The intelligence agencies will do their part by paying heavily for domestic newspaper articles if
they can arrange them, and by flooding a country's social media (China in this case) with CIA
sock puppets purporting to be native Chinese who side with the foreign company's position
against their own government. This is the primary reason Twitter and Facebook are
banned in China.

30
 Beijing's Bite of the Apple

Steve Jobs

Briefly, the situation was that Apple was offering warranties outside the US that were much
inferior to those at home, drawing flak from most governments in Europe and Asia. Chinese
consumer law, like that of European nations, classified Apple's ipad as a computer and
demanded a 2-year warranty. Apple, being too greedy for its own good, refused, insisting that
the ipad was a phone and providing only a one-year warranty. Hence, an enormous amount of
media noise attacking China and its regulations and much else, in attempts to create sufficient
unpleasantness that the government would back down and permit Apple to continue to plunder
Chinese consumers at will. A second prime objective was to teach the Chinese to cast a fearful
eye at "US interests" before embarking on any consumer protection laws more stringent than
those in the US.

In real life, neither the NYT or WSJ could care less about China's warranty regulations on
computers, but when Apple, the darling of the US stock market, is having trouble plundering
Chinese consumers to its heart's content, the NYT and WSJ are always there to lend a helping
hand. And you, dear reader, are taught to hate the Chinese for being unreasonable and 'picking
on' Apple because they are dictatorial communists who hate your freedoms. As well, the
propaganda masters widely claimed the Chinese government, envious of Apple's success,
wanted to cripple Apple to provide breathing space and support for China's hoped-for "national
champions". (1) (2) (3) The entire series of US media reports about Apple in China were political
and commercial propaganda designed to (a) insulate American firms from foreign laws, and (b)
create sufficient public pressure to ensure a foreign government designed its domestic laws to
please the Americans.

31
 Alibaba - Almost as big as China

Jack Ma

In early 2021 we had a spate of articles about Alibaba's unfortunate collision with Chinese
financial authorities, resulting in the cancellation of the company's imminent IPO and Jack Ma
being rather strongly reined in (slapped down, actually). (4) The US media were unanimous in
claiming China was severely restricting the activities of 'technology companies' (since
Alibaba is widely seen as such), but it wasn't Alibaba that was being harnessed. Jack Ma's Ant
Financial was being hugely expanded into an online under-the-radar banking institution hiding
between the pages of an IT firm and thus bypassing all the country's financial and banking
regulations. This would be similar to EBay or Amazon suddenly opening the largest retail bank
in the US, while flying the flag of a consumer goods market and subject to only those laws and
regulations.

The media were filled with claims that China was "tightening the screws on the country's tech
champions" with "a regulatory crackdown on the internet sector", but it was the financial
industry, not the technological, that the authorities moved to regulate. News media like the
NYT and WSJ would know this, and would have no reason to bury this information for their own
purposes, which means that someone instructed them on how to frame the story as China
curtailing tech firms.The US financial vultures had been severely pressuring China to open up
its financial sector, and the small flood of Alibaba articles was meant to put political pressure
on China to not limit American ambitions to plunder China's economy as they so freely did in
the US. Again, neither the NYT nor WSJ could care less about either Alibaba or China's financial
sector, but when their friends want to move to China and are concerned about regulations that
might cripple their greed, US media editors and columnists will answer the call. This means
that Alibaba was irrelevant in everything you read about Alibaba; the media flood was a political
warning to China to not extend their financial regulations to American predatory vulture firms.

But this is a game two can play. The Chinese media included this statement in one of their
articles: "Chinese regulators summon internet finance firms, a demonstrative move for other
players to investigate [their] own issues." (5) A message was clearly also being sent in the
other direction, at which point the US media flood quickly ceased.

32
 US Trade Deficits

Until recently, there was for two decades a huge amount of weekly media noise emanating
from Washington about the US trade deficit with China which increased to many hundreds of
billions of dollars per year, with no signs of moderating. The NYT and WSJ solemnly informed
us this occurred because China was cheating on its currency exchange rate, that the RMB was
grossly under-valued to make its exports competitive and foreign imports prohibitively
expensive.

Thus, in addition to constant complaints about China's US trade surplus, we were treated with
non-stop media noise about the necessity of China revaluing its currency upward by "at least
25% to 40%." That sounds reasonable until you discover the things they forgot to tell you.

The first is that the last US trade surplus was in 1975, the US having run annual trade deficits
for 46 straight years with a list of countries that has increased to more than 100. (6) (7) (8)
Do we suppose all those countries are cheating on their exchange rates? Of course not. The
reason the US has a trade deficit is because the country has so de-industrialised itself that it
no longer makes anything anyone wants to buy. China is irrelevant in this picture. If the US
didn't buy from China, it would have to buy from someone else, but the deficit would remain.
And as to the currencies, China runs trade deficits with many other countries - whose currencies
trade freely - which means the world's exchange rates are also irrelevant to the problem.

Now we know something we didn't know before, and now we can identify this economic 'news'
as the propaganda that it is, and we can also ascertain its purpose: the crippling of China's
economy. I mentioned in Part 1 of this series the Plaza Accord that was forced onto Japan
who, being a US colony, had no choice but to accept. In that case, the Yen was eventually
revalued by around 300%, leaving Japan permanently crippled. And, as I stated, this was the
plan for China, the immense, 2 decade-long media onslaught by the US was an attempt to
force Chinese leaders to commit economic suicide. Happily, they refused.

It is important to understand that this prolonged situation was not a reflection of reality. It was
not like me saying, "This is the 76th time I've had to speak to you about your cat digging in
my rose bushes." There was no ‘news’ here, no ‘event’, and the media noise was unrelated to
33
trade or deficits or currency values; it was a long-term plan to create sufficient worldwide
pressure to collapse China's economy by forcing an unwarranted revaluation. It should be
obvious that such a program, unremitting for 20 years, was not something that happened by
chance. It was part of an overall strategy, as US-China Ambassador Jon Huntsman so frequently
stated, to "bring China down".

Paul Krugman

During those two decades, the editors and columnists of the major US media would have been
in regular and frequent contact with the US FED, the Departments of Commerce and the
Treasury, the Council of Economic Advisers, the OMB, the National Security Agency, and again
the intelligence agencies, certainly the CIA and NSA. It would also have been necessary to
conscript specific columnists - like Paul Krugman of the NYT - to carry the torch and take the
lead in this propaganda war.

Indeed, the media function as the microphone of the US State Department, full
partners in scripting propaganda campaigns to achieve foreign policy objectives.

This entire media flood was 100% political propaganda, geo-political at its root,
geared to the destruction of one particular nation. You can imagine their almost savage
determination in continuing this strategy for more than two decades before surrendering. And
it had the beneficial side-effect of teaching people in all countries to "hate China for
cheating".

34
 Criminals in Need of Protection

Few people are aware that all but one of the largest consumer frauds perpetrated in China
during the past ten years, were by foreign firms, mostly American, the US media (and
AmCham) in every case doing their best to protect the criminals from prosecution,
relying on public propaganda to intimidate the Chinese authorities from doing their duty.

It is almost comical that each time an American company is charged with a massive fraud in
China, AmCham releases a report informing us that foreign firms suddenly feel "less
welcome" in China, dutifully reported in detail by Bloomberg (9), while the WSJ whines that
China's "crackdown on monopoly pricing and corruption . . . unfairly targets foreign
companies". (10)
35
 OSI

In one such case in 2014, the American OSI food-agricultural giant in China was exposed for
repackaging expired and dirty meat on a massive scale extending for many years,
complete with two sets of record books for deceiving the authorities. Company officials tried
desperately to block the investigation, refusing entry to the plant by the Shanghai food and
drug authority for a long enough time to destroy evidence. The authorities had to seize and
destroy millions of kilograms of diseased and dirty meat, in a scandal that would eventually
cover all of China.

Sheldon Lavin, CEO of OSI Group.

36
The Shanghai FDA produced more than 5,000 crates of McDonald's Chicken McNuggets,
pork patties and beef steaks that were all expired and moldy. TV video showed employees
mixing expired and fresh meat in new packaging, and saying that if their clients knew what
they were doing, the firm would lose its contracts. This was not a small thing: Chinese health
authorities assigned nearly 900 investigators to inspect the company's many sites before all
the evidence could be destroyed.

Of course, everyone was "shocked, shocked" at the news, the US media dutifully reporting that
Sheldon Lavin, CEO of OSI Group, described the scandal as "unacceptable" and "terribly
wrong", and would ensure the "missteps" never happen again. The New York Times blamed the
victims and suppliers, attributing the entire criminal plot to "weak links in China's food chain".
(11) The NYT also stated OSI "was halting operations" and "would review all its China plants"
- after the authorities had already shut them down and imprisoned the executives. And of
course instead of condemning the (American) criminals for their crimes, the NYT spun the story
into "Food safety in China faces big hurdles". (12)

There was also a protective layer of defiance in attempts to create political pressure to mitigate
the damage, with statements that for the Shanghai government "to define [OSI products] as
'questionable' ... is totally without factual, scientific or legal foundation." Not really, but nice
try.

37
 Consumer Fraud? Just Do it!

At the end of 2011, Nike admitted to a scheme of false advertising in China. At the time, a new
Nike sport shoe had become the newest 'must-have' item for the kids. A prime feature in
Nike's advertising was that the shoe had two air cushions, to provide shock absorption. The
shoe, which I believe was made in China, was priced in the US at 700 RMB ($125), while the
price in China was 1,300 RMB (over $200). Nike heavily advertised the product in China as
being the original; however the company made a much cheaper substandard version of the
shoe to be sold in China.

Chinese consumers picked up on the fraud very quickly and reported the matter to the
authorities, China's SAIC eventually levying a fine of nearly $1 million and instructing Nike to
refund the full purchase price to all customers. Interestingly, Nike repeated this exact same
fraud some years later, apparently learning nothing the first time.

38
 Stan Abrams

I'm using a bit more space than this event would warrant because Nike had not only the backing
of the US media but of an American lawyer named Stan Abrams (13) (14) who frequently
appears on the criminal side of the consumer ledger in China to lend weight to the media
propaganda narrative. Abrams defended Nike's consumer fraud in China by perpetrating
another of his own.

He began by stating: "There are two issues here: differential pricing and product
quality/features." No, Stan. "Differential pricing" is a hamburger at $2.40 in one location
and $2.50 in another. And 'product features' are irrelevant since the issue was fraudulent
advertising.

Abrams wrote that "consumers certainly have a right to complain . . . assuming that these air
cushions are at all functional and mean anything. (I doubt it.)". So if my Mercedes dealer
assures me the car seats are leather but prove to be plastic, I shouldn't complain since the
leather isn't functional and doesn't mean anything anyway. I suppose the same would hold true
when Abrams finds himself unable to consummate his marriage. He could simply tell his
disappointed new bride that the missing feature "wasn't functional anyway", and wouldn't have
meant anything even if it had been.

Our too-clever-by-half lawyer continues, "Is it illegal to have a product overseas that has one
air cushion and another one here that sells with only one? Absurd. Of course that's not a legal
issue. Companies are of course free to sell products in different markets that are not identical."
Abrams' comments are strictly true, but irrelevant. The question is not different product
features but the advertising of features that don't exist. We call that consumer fraud.
Abrams' view of all this? "So we’ve got false advertising, potentially fraud, advertising law,
consumer law violations, blah blah blah . . . Chinese consumers should be guaranteed the
lowest global price for any consumer product? If a product feature is offered to a consumer
anywhere in the world ... the company [must] offer that feature in China as well? That sounds
crazy, but maybe I’m missing something here." Cheap attempts by a man holding the
microphone, to make young Chinese ashamed that they dislike being cheated.

39
I have an important second reason for the length of this segment: the events that must have
taken place prior to this fraud. A shoe factory is a large place, with production and assembly
lines generally created for only one product design. Nike would have to create a new design
and factory specifications as well as build a new assembly line to manufacture the substandard
Chinese version of this shoe. But Nike's Marketing Department would not quietly design
and manufacture a substandard version of a popular product and plan to fraudulently
misrepresent it without the knowledge and acquiescence of the CEO, because of the
potentially serious legal repercussions to the company, and the obvious threat to their
employment. And that means the top management of Nike, very likely including the Board of
Directors, shared the prior decision to make a substandard copy of a product and fraudulently
flog it to the Chinese as an original, on the assumption that customers would either be too
unsophisticated to know what they bought, or be too meek to complain. And that constitutes
executive fraud at the highest level.

In case you're still tempted to think this might have been the first time such a thing has
occurred with Nike, here is a quote from Charlie Denson, President of the Nike brand, in a
conference call with financial analysts:

"The [Chinese] consumer is becoming more discerning and sophisticated ... creating
short-time challenges for retailers. It's a natural evolution we've seen in many markets,
so we're not surprised." (15)

The US media were in full support of Nike, the WSJ telling us only 300 pairs of these shoes
were sold "with an inaccurate product description" (16), so really a tempest in a teapot for so
large a fine of 5 million RMB and compulsory refunds.

40
 GSK

Mark Reilly

Not too long ago the pharma company GSK was involved in one of the largest frauds China
has ever experienced, with bribery, payoffs, false accounting, involving at least half a billion
dollars. (17) (18) Upon discovery, Mark Reilly, the company's China President, was on the
next plane out of the country "on a previously-planned business trip" to England, "to help with
the investigation from that end". The UK media obediently flogged the propaganda narrative
that it wasn't the company's fault, that GSK was itself "the victim" of fraud committed by its
Chinese staff, including apparently bribing doctors with sexual favors and with half a billion
dollars of the company’s cash that for years nobody noticed was missing. (19)

There have been many of these foreign frauds in China and in each case the propaganda
machine worked overtime to condemn the Chinese authorities for stamping them out. In one
huge case involving the foreign auto industry in a massive price-fixing collusion, the media
informed us the foreign firms were "a casualty of a renewed state media assault on foreign
automotive brands". Or foreign baby milk companies or foreign foods or mobile phones. In
every case we saw a small flood of US propaganda denouncing the Chinese government of
launching "an assault" on foreign firms, neglecting entirely the criminality involved, and with
the same purpose of pressuring the Chinese government to deal gently with American criminal
corporations.

We have seen media floods in defense of a long list of corporations whose criminal enterprises
have been exposed. All are propaganda designed to pressure foreign governments to treat
American (and some European) companies gently, even in the face of massive and serious
criminal activity. There are two others I would like to bring to your attention, one involving
Coca-Cola and espionage, the other the illegal compilation of data concerning China's oil
production. Both are of immense importance and are covered in a previous article. (20) Both
were exposed to major media propaganda floods and even consular intervention in attempts
to mitigate the fallout.
41
It is important to keep in mind that 'the media' is not some amorphous, inanimate object but
a group of real people with names, who plan, script and conduct these propaganda campaigns.
I have had encounters with some of these 'reporters' and 'columnists'. Many of them qualify
as gangsters, acting as front men for a criminal enterprise, using their public power to
shield and defend those who should be imprisoned and trashing anyone who stands in their
way.

Project Censored?

In contrast to hearing much media noise on a topic, we sometimes have only a deafening
silence which is equally a guarantee of propaganda, this time in the form of censorship. When
the entire Western media unanimously have no comment on an important current topic, we
can be certain that much has happened behind the scenes to ensure this result.

42
 Bottling Coke and Spilling Blood

Some years ago, Latin America was almost up in arms about the fact that virtually every union
leader attempting to unionise a Coca-Cola bottling plant was suddenly found dead,
the evidence substantiating the thesis that these were gangland hits organised by the bottlers.
Coca-Cola disclaimed responsibility on the basis that many of the bottling plants were locally-
owned. The claims were entirely suppressed and the disclaimer received only a few brief
mentions in the US and none anywhere else that I could discover. (21)

In similar fashion, and more recently, the Mexican news media ran an excited flurry of stories
that Coca-Cola employees had voted to form a national union and that the next day all were
forced to resign, apparently many at gunpoint. They would be re-hired later, but no union. I
returned to those sites the next day to learn more, but was surprised to discover that the entire
Mexican media landscape had been scrubbed clean. All prior links were dead, no news medium
(in Mexico or indeed in any Western country) contained any reference to this event, Facebook
and Twitter no longer had any posts referring to it, and Google suddenly had no idea it had
ever happened.

You might care to pause for a moment to think of all the persons who would have to be involved
to accomplish such a result. You might also contemplate that the Coca-Cola Company hasn't
the leverage to do this, and ask yourself who took the lead in this effort and what was
the source of their power to ensure 100% compliance of so many media outlets in so
many nations. And so quickly.

43
 Vaccinations against Pregnancy

In this same category, a vaccination program was initiated some years ago under the auspices
of the WHO that sterilised about 150 million women in developing countries - without their
knowledge and against their will. Briefly, a tetanus vaccine was created which also
contained the female hormone hCG which is essential in implanting a fertilised egg into the
uterus wall; the absence of this hormone will inevitably result in miscarriages or spontaneous
abortions. These vaccinations were carried out in many nations in the guise of protection
against tetanus, but the recipients were limited solely to females of child-bearing age,
and immediately resulted in voluminous reports of spontaneous abortions since many
vaccinated females were already pregnant. Testing of the vaccines proved the presence
of hCG. The WHO attempted many denials and defenses but were moved to silence by the
overwhelming evidence. This is not conspiracy theory but heavily-documented fact. I
researched the matter thoroughly and in fact the WHO's own website had a list of scientific
papers that documented extensively how they spent 20 years and more than $400
million dollars to develop an "anti-fertility" vaccine containing hCG and using tetanus
toxoid as the carrier. I wrote a detailed article on this, with substantial documentation (22).
I recommend you read it; it will change the way you look at many things.

In terms of media propaganda, of the negative side of censorship, not one of the many
hundreds of major Western news media made any reference to this despicably tragic program.
You might again ask yourself how many individuals in which places must have been involved
to ensure such a complete blanket of silence, and what is the source of their power to do
this.

In a nearly identical circumstance, two prominent European medical experts recently swore
that at least some current COVID-19 vaccines contain a female hormone with a function similar
to hCG and that the vaccines have the potential to function as an abortifacient. (23) (24) I
have not researched this one thoroughly and cannot testify to the validity, but I can offer the
following:

44
Dr. Mike Yeadon was a 17-year veteran at Pfizer’s R&D unit in Sandwich, England, and was
the Chief Scientific Officer (CSO) of the entire group and in charge of the company’s respiratory
research program. In the autumn of 2010, Pfizer lost interest in, and decided to terminate,
their Allergy and Respiratory Diseases programs, eliminating the entire unit. However, Pfizer
agreed to finance Yeadon in the formation of a new company to continue this same research,
turning over to Yeadon all the assets of this research group not for cash but for equity, Yeadon
then raising private capital to finance the continued operation of the new company named
Ziarco. It was so successful that Novartis eventually acquired 100% of the stakes less than 10
years later for what was reported to be more than $1 billion.

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg is a German physician, pulmonary specialist, and epidemiologist.

"Both Dr. Yeadon and Dr. Wodarg stated categorically that Pfizer’s vaccine contains
a spike protein called syncytin-1, which is vital for the formation of the placenta in
pregnant women, and were so concerned about its sterilisation effects that they filed
an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency, for the immediate
suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer
variants."

It would seem unusual that two internationally-respected epidemiologists would claim a non-
existent spike protein and pursue their ignorance to the point of requesting an international
body to immediately cease vaccine research due to this totally imaginary problem.

45
I have to state it would appear as a deranged conspiracy theory to suggest that the powers
wanting us vaccinated would also want us sterilised, and would do so in what could only
be a monstrous conspiracy contrived by Satan and executed by his lieutenants. But
these same people created similar vaccines used by the WHO for the same purpose, a program
too well-documented to be denied. If they would do it once, why wouldn't they do it again? I
have no answer for you. You decide. But the salient point here is that neither of these
two cases rated even a mention anywhere in the Western mainstream media - at least
none that I could find.

46
 Notes

(1) https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2017/05/15/chinas-national-champions-state-support-makes-
chinese-companies-dominant/
(2) https://www.state.gov/reports/2019-investment-climate-statements/china/
(3) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41291-019-00084-0
(4) https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/10/tech/alibaba-china-record-fine/index.html
(5) https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202104/1222504.shtml
(6) https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/usa-has-run-annual-trade-deficits-41-
straight-years
(7) https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/us-trade-deficit-by-country
(8) https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-the-us-balance-of-trade-1147456
(9) https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-30/most-foreign-companies-feel-less-welcome-
in-china-amcham-says
(10) https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-firms-feel-less-welcome-in-china-1409624607
(11) https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/01/business/international/weak-links-in-chinas-food-chain.html
(12) https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/24/business/international/food-safety-in-china-still-faces-big-
hurdles.html
(13) https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2012/02/29/stan-abrams-of-china-hearsay-a-case-of-pathological-
bia/
(14) https://www.chinamoneynetwork.com/2011/11/13/stan-abrams-progress-seen-on-chinas-anti-
monopoly-law
(15) https://news.yahoo.com/news/nikes-profit-decline-china-stunning-004732723.html
(16) https://www.wsj.com/articles/nike-target-of-complaints-in-chinas-annual-consumers-forum-
1489600425
(17) https://www.bbc.com/news/business-29274822

47
(18) https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/may/28/serious-fraud-office-investigates-
glaxosmithkline
(19) https://uk.news.yahoo.com/gsk-victim-china-graft-130312678.html
(20) If You Do It, It's Spying. If I Do It, It's Research
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/08/blog-post_45.html
(21) http://www.killercoke.org/downloads/spilling-blood-11_11_03.pdf
(22) A Cautionary Tale About the WHO – May 10, 2020
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/05/a-cautionary-tale-about-who.html
(23) https://mattbell.org/mrna-vaccine-blocks-protein-that-helps-formation-of-human-placenta
(24) https://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/head-of-pfizer-research-covid-vaccine-is-female-
sterilization/277390

48
The Globe & Mail is a respectable broadsheet long recognised as Canada's national newspaper.
Some years ago, the Globe published an article detailing the atrocities then being committed
against the Arabs in Palestine. The article wasn't inflammatory or ideological, but simply an
accurate chronicle of events the editors believed should be brought to the attention of the
world. The very next morning, the entire top half of the front page of the Globe carried a huge
photo of a Jewish soldier giving candy to a supposedly Palestinian child, with text to match.
You don't need an imagination to know what must have happened behind a closed door
somewhere. The date was 1983 and, in the 38 years since then, the Globe hasn't
published a single article that was critical of either the Jews or of Israel. Much the
opposite, in fact. One of their more celebrated pieces was titled, “Shmeck the Halls”, a story
about how two Jewish songwriters “created Christmas”. (1)

It is widely-known that a relatively small handful of people, all Jews, either own or exercise
virtual total control over all Western (and much other) media. This includes not only
newspapers, but radio and TV stations and networks, plus most recognised magazines,
virtually the entire book publishing industry, all of the social media and related internet
platforms like Wikipedia and Google, as well as 90% of Hollywood which includes both
motion pictures and television programs. The people involved do not like this information
stated publicly, but the facts are not in dispute and indeed Jewish publications boast privately
about the extent of their ownership of the media as well as of their control of movies and
television.

49
Philip Weiss wrote an article in Mondoweiss titled, "Do Jews Dominate in American Media?
And So What If We Do?" (2) In his article, he inserted this observation and quotation: As
former CNN correspondent Linda Scherzer has said, "We, as Jews, must understand that
we come with a certain bias … We believe in the Israeli narrative of history. We
support the values that we as Americans, Westerners, and Jews espouse. Thus, we
see news reporting through our own prism." (3)

Yes, and that isn't necessarily a bad thing, depending of course on the orientation of the facets
of that prism. Much of the reporting through that "Jewish prism" is harmless, while some of
it is helpful. In fact, much of the second and third tier of the Internet consists of platforms that
provide us with our only alternative sources of publication and information, and are operated
mostly but not entirely by Jews. The Vineyard of the Saker, the Unz Review, Global
Research and many similar. Without these, our world would be one-dimensional. The problem
is that, aside from the 'helpful prisms', the vast majority of these Jewish contributors are low-
level conscripts. I don't mean to denigrate their abilities or contribution; merely to state that
they are nowhere near the top of the pyramid where the "values" are decided and the
narratives constructed. And it is the top of the pyramid that requires our focus.

In the comments section of my article Propaganda and the Media – Part 1, one reader related
the following paragraph by Michael Cieply:

By and large, talented reporters scrambled to match stories with what internally was often
called “the narrative”. We were occasionally asked to map a narrative for our various beats
a year in advance, square the plan with editors, then generate stories that fit the pre-
designated line. The bigger shock came on being told, at least twice, by Times editors who
were describing the paper’s daily Page One meeting: “We set the agenda for the country
in that room.” (4) (5)

This is the real issue: The NYT are not in the business of reporting news but of creating and
then editorialising it with ideology, with 'viewpoints', and with their ‘agenda for the
country'. And they aren't alone. Within these parts of the Jewish-owned media scaffolding,
there exists a commonality, a synchronicity, a simultaneity, a shared identity, that does not
originate within these scattered pieces of the media herd but comes from somewhere higher in
the pyramid, from a central source quietly operating behind the scenes in Europe. It
cannot be otherwise: When every newspaper in the Western world and much of the rest can
repeatedly report on the same events in the same way with an astonishing total uniformity,
this cannot possibly be random and cannot be attributed to use of a newswire service.
Someone, somewhere, as Bernays was so fond of saying, is "pulling the wires which
control the public mind." (6)

As evidence (admittedly circumstantial but obviously also powerful), consider the hate
campaign against China that has been running at full speed for the past at least 18 months
in every Western country, and this gleeful review of the results which reflects only three
countries of the many where similar programs and polls have been conducted:

50
Ask yourself: how could it happen that virtually every editor and TV newsroom director in
the West (and in much of the rest of the world) would, without external contact or instruction,
independently and simultaneously decide to mount an intense, unremitting, and relentless
negative campaign against China and everything Chinese? How would it happen that similar
unanimous and simultaneous demonising campaigns were mounted against Iraq and Libya prior
to their invasion and colonisation? Against Russia, Cuba and North Korea? Against Venezuela
today? How is it that an enormous swath of these media outlets, not only newspapers but
including (apparently unrelated) television networks and magazines would have the same
story to tell us about ZIKA, all unanimous with cries for Latin America to relax its
abortion restrictions?

As I stated in Part 1 of this series, the important point is that these 'media floods' as I call
them do not and cannot happen by accident. These circumstances are planned
meticulously, and implemented with strategies carefully chosen according to Freud's theories
to create public discomfort and emotional pressure for acceptance of 'the agenda', to
manipulate public attitudes on political, social, and commercial issues - in fact "pulling
the wires which control the public mind."

Sometimes the agenda is for the benefit of their countless hundreds of huge multinationals,
many more than you might imagine, many controlled in ways you might not imagine. As one
example the Jewish Wallenberg family has been reliably fixed as controlling more than 40%
of the stocks listed on Sweden's exchange, as well as about 40% of the GDP of the
nation. One detailed and extensively-documented study concluded that fewer than 150
corporations controlled at least 40% of everything on the world's listed stock markets. (7) (8)
The first link gives an excellent summary, with links to important sources.

Most of the multi-nationals you know so well, and a great many you may not know, are in this
incestuous grouping, controlled mostly by privately-owned banks, related hedge funds and
similar. But the statistic omits the essential point and the reality of this condition, because it is
not the 150 companies who control virtually everything and who set the international corporate
‘agenda’, but the ultimate beneficial owners of those companies – real people with
names. As an example, if Berkshire-Hathaway buys Coca-Cola, it is not “Berkshire-Hathaway”

51
that sets the agenda for Coca-Cola to liquidate union organisers in Latin America; it is Warren
Buffett who does that.

As another example, much effort has been made to tally the assets of the Rothschild banking
family. A creditable result obtained some years back with an estimate of between 6 trillion and
7 trillion US dollars, with many of the European Jewish banking families being similar. Since
that time, I have obtained a graphic that displays the vast holdings of the Rothschilds. It
appears similar to a corporate organisation chart, with small boxes and lines indicating the
holdings and the directions of control. To print this graphic in the smallest readable type, would
require a sheet of paper 1/2 a square meter in size. It was recently reported that
Rothschild established a new bank simply to hold his accumulation of arable land that
has been acquired in so many nations.

In a brief abstract taken from a database of Chinese scientific and technological journals; The
Age of Innovation 2013 Issue 6; 95-97 pp. 3 of 1003, the text says: Rothschild was "sitting on
a $6 billon fortune in the 1850s, and was known (in China) as "the enemy". It even accurately
addresses the deep Jewish influence on the US government at the time: "The Democratic
Party belongs to the Morgan family, and the Republican Party belongs to the
Rockefeller family." Rockefeller and Morgan, however, belonged to Rothschild."

This is admittedly speculative because hard facts are seldom available and because of the
intense secrecy and use of so many tax havens, but my updated estimate of the accumulated
wealth of the Rothschilds is between 20 trillion and 30 trillion US dollars. You can imagine the
power associated with wealth of this magnitude, including political power which has existed and
grown for centuries.

Much has been written, and many tallies presented, of “The Richest Man in the World”, an honor
alternating for years between Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Carlos Slim and, more recently, Jeff
Bezos. This has all been false propaganda emanating from the same source as every
item on the ‘agenda’, Rothschild and the Jewish banking families of Sassoon, Warburg,
Montefiori, and many others disappearing entirely from view and apparently non-
existent. We have many Jewish websites ‘debunking’ the fiction of Jewish banking families
being wealthy, and Wikipedia tells us that the Rothschilds were once rich but they so freely
distributed their wealth among their many children and are now merely middle-class
Europeans. This silence, and the associated fiction, is one part of the ‘agenda’
emanating from the central core.

As one quick example, Canada, through its cleverly Jewish-controlled central bank, has paid
these European bankers more than one trillion US dollars in interest during the past 30 or 40
years. And this is only one of dozens of central banks they control. The real truth about the
‘richest man’ that no medium anywhere has had the courage to state openly, is that compared
to these European Jewish bankers, Bill Gates is pocket change. The interest alone that
these people earn each year from these central banks is far more than Gates’ entire wealth,
and this isn’t accounting for the revenue deriving from their hundreds of huge multi-national
corporations.

52
Rothschild's Sanofi-Aventis-Connaught is perhaps the largest manufacturer of
vaccines in the world. If a few members of this elite group stand to benefit from the sale of
COVID-19 (or other) vaccines, their close media partners will cooperate to heavily promote
vaccinations, while elected officials will legislate them as compulsory, with their controlled
governments scheming 'vaccination passports' to ensure sales (one of the 'benefits' of
democracy), while relieving the vaccine makers of all liability. They will heavily pressure
poor governments into the purchases and will utilise every portion of the UN, including the
World Bank and IMF as well as the WHO, to tie loans and other assistance to these purchases
- while stipulating the avoidance of such vaccines not manufactured by their group, such as
those from China and Russia, the media helpfully denigrating these as 'untested' and
'ineffective', with the UN and various Western governments helpfully withholding approvals.
It's a very small club.

Certainly, members of this media herd can determine an agenda on local matters, though they
would be working in concert, but not so for international and serious geo-political affairs - which
would be above their level. In simple terms, neither the NYT nor the Huffington Post would
decide on their own that Libya should be invaded and colonised, and all its gold and oil seized
by a few European bankers and industrialists. If they were to attempt such a maneuver, they
would be alone, and likely held to ridicule. But when the entire list of international media
sources suddenly and simultaneously espouses this agenda, we know it originated in
a central source with 'the agenda' delivered to media lieutenants for execution.

Much of the agenda, as you already know, is geo-political, and has existed in its present form
for nearly 100 years. It began with Lippman and Bernays in marketing both world wars
(9), and continued most notably when on June 5, 1989, every one of these media sources
unanimously carried the same story about China's student demonstration in Tiananmen
Square - a story that has been proven totally false even by the US Embassy itself (10).

The uniform agenda was fully evident during the media floods preparing the world for the
invasion and total confiscation of the assets of Iraq and Libya, and it is much in evidence today
in their current Anger Campaign against China (11). We have COVID-19 "escaping" from a
Chinese lab, the "genocide" occurring in Xinjiang, the travesties in Tibet, the "democracy"
protests in Hong Kong, the threatened invasion of Taiwan, China's "military threatening" of
all South-East Asia, China's "militarisation" of the South China Seas. We have Huawei, Tik-
Tok and WeChat (12); we have accusations of cyber-spying. We have "questionable Chinese
economic data" (13) prepared by "authoritarian dictators" desperate to cling to their
"tenuous grip on power".

The Jewish columnist Jonathan Kay of Canada's Jewish-owned National Post tells us "China's
ruthless foreign policy is changing the world in dangerous ways", that "unlike the US", "China
doesn't even pretend to operate on any other principle except naked self-interest." (14) We
have Roderic Broadhurst in the SCMP telling us that "Corruption is a byproduct of Chinese
party-state's defective genes" (15). Jewish historical websites (16) and the NYT (17) are today
telling us the Bubonic Plague that killed 30% of the population of Europe actually originated in
China, as did the Rockefeller Medical Institute's 1918 "influenza" pandemic that killed as many
as 100 million people. Today, China is "stealing our secrets" while "enslaving the

53
world", has no "rule of law" and is "choking on its own success" in cities that are
"barely livable" and inhabited by only children who have no future.

The established 'agenda' includes at its core an upheaval of the world's educational, social,
sexual, religious, and family values. In an earlier essay titled "Connecting the Dots" (18), I
stated the following: It often happens that events we view as isolated occurrences are
connected as integral parts of a much larger picture, often as part of a wide-ranging
plan, and frequently with important social, economic, and/or political implications
which become evident only when seen in total." We must today make a sincere effort to
connect related events and see them as portions of the overall plan that they are.

As one example of the determined indoctrination efforts to re-vamp our social and sexual
values, Canada is passing new legislation (the country's only new legislation of consequence)
to lower (and then eliminate) the age of consent for anal sex while adopting striking new
measures for "assisted dying" of family members, especially those who either cost money or
have money to distribute. Canada's British Columbia government officially endorses sexual
"Glory Holes" (19) (20), releasing a detailed 16-page brochure with tips on how to best use,
and offers new tips for masturbation & orgies. The new tip sheet was inspired by a document
released earlier by the health authority of New York City (21), and sharing "some invaluable
insights on how to stage orgies . . . amid the pandemic". Pornhub, the world's largest
pornographic website, located in Montreal, Canada, (22) (23) has become mainstream media
with the apparent silent approval of Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Certainly, he’s had
nothing negative to offer, in spite of the outrage that website has caused for egregious
violations.

In its 'Entertainment' section, the Huffington Post helpfully advises on the best places for
women to find pornography online (24), along with another article advising that "Swinging is
back" and how to assess "if it's right for you" (25). In other parts, pedophilia, incest and sex
parties are being promoted. ABC discusses young girls repaying their student loans by being a
"sugar baby" (26), working to separate sex and morality by encouraging young girls to
prostitute themselves. Such a discussion in the mainstream media serves not only to
legitimise but to "approve" of these attitudes.

Add these to the continuous flood of the alphabet soup of "sexual preferences" being promoted
today, and try to see this as one enormous propaganda campaign being flogged worldwide as
one portion of the "agenda" determined and promulgated by these same people. With the power
of the mass media, they are in fact dictating the new attitudes and points of view to be
accepted, while censoring and condemning contrary opinions.

I stated earlier that the US media function as the microphone of the US State Department, full
partners in scripting propaganda campaigns to achieve foreign policy objectives. But it is crucial
to understand that the Americans are not leading these international geo-political, social, and
moral assaults. They are merely functioning as the Bankers' Private Army to
accomplish the objectives of a group of European-UK elites who are always in the
shadows and led by one who, like Voldemort, is "he who must not be named".

54
The marketing control of this agenda is near total. We have not only the newspapers,
magazines, radio and television stations and book publishers, but the social media have been
100% conscripted into this agenda. Scores of websites, including some very prominent ones,
have been 'de-platformed' by Google, to the extent their contents almost never appear in
searches. Facebook and Twitter have become quite aggressive in censoring and silencing all
dissenting voices to the extent that even mentioning an author's name or listing the URL of an
article is now flagged as "false news" and either prohibited or deleted. The so-called "fact-
checkers" are doing their part to trash anyone escaping the censorship net.

Again, pause for a moment to think of all the persons who must be involved to
accomplish such results. How many individuals in which places must be involved to ensure
either an unremitting flood of propaganda or a complete blanket of silence, and ask yourself
what is the source of their power to do this.

The connection you need to make is that all of these agenda categories, and many
more, emanate from the same source. It is not 'the media' who want to invade Iran and
confiscate the country's oil. It is not the NYT journalists who want to destroy China and Russia
or the WSJ editors who are determined to initiate World War III. It is not Arianna Huffington
who wants you to become sexual perverts and abandon your moral, social, religious, and family
values. These media people are tools for distributing the propaganda and manipulating public
opinion according to the various items currently on 'the agenda'. Media editors and
columnists are lieutenants; they receive instructions and act on them. It happens because
the relative handful of real, live people who set the agenda have unshakeable ethnic and
philosophical bonds with the media owners and editors to ensure cooperation in their mutual
view of the world. They all belong to the same small club and share the same 'interests' and
'values'. This is all part of one thing, emanating from a small group of real people with
names.

In an earlier article titled “Humanity at the Crossroads” (27), I began with this statement:

Humankind is at a cusp, a point of transition between two different states of governance and
existence. The world today is like a sack being slowly filled while the string around the opening
is pulled increasingly tighter to prevent the contents from escaping confinement. The shadows
of this future are everywhere to be seen but even the keenest of observers tend to view the
portents not as the warnings they are, but instead regard all these pieces of one
despairing puzzle as disconnected and unrelated events. In this essay, we will take a
look at where our world is going, how it is going there, and why it is going there.

55
 Notes

(1) https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/music/schmeck-the-halls-how-jewish-songwriters-created-
christmas/article1320756/
(2) https://mondoweiss.net/2008/02/do-jews-dominat/
(3) http://www.ujc.org/page.html?ArticleID=78802
(4)http://deadline.com/2016/11/shocked-by-trump-new-york-times-finds-time-for-soul-searching-
1201852490/
(5)https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/stunned-trump-york-times-finds-205904328.html
(6) Bernays and Propaganda – Part 1 of 5
http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1562/
(7) https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228354-500-revealed-the-capitalist-network-that-runs-
the-world/
(8) https://www.forbes.com/sites/bruceupbin/2011/10/22/the-147-companies-that-control-everything/
(9) http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1582/
(10) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/04/tiananmen-square-failure-of-american.html
(11) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/08/blog-post_49.html
(12) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/08/huawei-tik-tok-and-wechat-august-8-2020.html
(13) http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/chinese-data-prompt-
doubts-over-accuracy/article4414683/
(14) https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jonathan-kay-chinas-ruthless-foreign-policy-is-changing-the-
world-in-dangerous-ways
(15) SCMP.com; 12 December, 2013
(16) http://www.jewishhistory.org.il/history.php?startyear=1340&endyear=1349
(17) http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/01/health/01plague.html

56
(18) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/06/connecting-dots-june-24-2020.html
(19) https://www.rt.com/news/495509-canada-covid-glory-hole/
(20) pic.twitter.com/sS7vmFuCDa
(21) https://www.rt.com/usa/491458-new-york-covid-sex-tips/
(22) https://www.ibtimes.com/sexual-abuse-victims-urge-canada-investigate-pornhub-3156530
(23) https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/montreal-luxury-home-of-pornhub-owner-destroyed-in-suspected-
arson-1.5402120
(24) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/best-porn-for-women-online_564f71f9e4b0258edb316a5a
(25) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sandra-lamorgese-phd/swinging_b_8884220.htm
(26) https://abcnews.go.com/US/paying-student-loans-sugar-baby/story?id=72175621
(27) http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/2331/ Humanity at the Crossroads

57
If I were a dictator, one of my first dictates would be that every adult must take at
least one university-level course in logic. In today's world, with what is essentially an
international criminal element in control, one which effectively manages public perception
through their leverage over the mass media, readers would benefit immensely from some
exposure to the principles of logic.

The main issue is that logic is concerned with the practical science of reasoning (truth and
validity of arguments), but the actual mental processes we employ in reasoning are the
province of psychology, not science, and are often not valid, leading to conclusions which are
not true. It is the latter that media propagandists use to violate the former, by taking advantage
of our psychological reasoning processes to lead us to false conclusions while masking their
tactics so we remain unaware of the deception. Most of these tactics are surprisingly
simple.

One is to associate an argument with a famous person or an embedded religious or political

tenet. A statement like "Every patriotic American will agree that . . .", is often sufficient to lead
us to a wrong conclusion, in spite of our intuition telling us something is not right. Another
tactic very commonly used is to attack the character or authority of the author, or even the
tone of his writing, without actually addressing the substance of his argument, and in fact to
rigorously avoid addressing the argument. If I can successfully impugn your character, many
readers will discount anything you say.

58
And surprisingly often, simply stating the opposite without any supporting evidence is sufficient
to deflect our reasoning from the truth: "He stated the now-debunked theory that . . .", with
no evidence the theory was actually debunked, nor by whom, nor on what basis.

I will focus here, with examples, on two primary tactics in the false logic of media propaganda.
The first is the astonishingly simple one of attaching a lie to a truth. Our psychological reasoning
processes will recognise a first statement as true, then automatically accept an attached lie as
being also true. The second is the use of statements that appear at least plausible, but which
are followed by a vacuum of information, forcing us to either accept or reject outright the
statement, but giving us no basis on which to do so. Uninformed readers will almost inevitably
accept such unsupported statements as true, in spite of the total lack of evidence.

Much of the information presented to us in the form of what we now term "the official narrative"
of so many geo-political events, is almost childish in its presentation yet so cleverly done by
the propaganda experts that little apparent criticism is generated and the public seem to accept
the stories in spite of the immense and glaring flaws. This is the reason the media articles
present either no details or almost none; if no information is given, there is nothing
to question or attack; if no claims are made, no resistances arise.

Thus, we have statements referring to "China's increasing militarism in the South China Seas",
but no information, no data, no documentation beyond that empty claim. This leaves readers
with the choice of either accepting or rejecting the claim itself but, except with informed
readers, no basis on which to do either because of the complete lack of information. And,
traditionally, if the public encounter this claim in five or six different media sources, they will
tend to accept it as true in spite of the complete absence of evidence. Even worse, it has been
repeatedly proven that big lies are more readily accepted than are the small ones. This is the
legacy left by Freud, Bernays and Lippman, the ease of "pulling the wires that control the
public mind", provided only that one controls the microphone.

Usually, the 'official narrative' contains a simple statement that is either true or at least
marginally plausible, one which we tend to accept intuitively as true. As I noted, one of the
most clever tactics in propaganda is to attach a lie to a truth. Casual or cursory readers and
viewers will almost always fail to notice the startling lack of logic and discontinuity in reasoning
in the information they are accepting as true. Consider this from CNN:

"China's ambition is to make high-speed rail the mode of choice for domestic long-distance
travel, but [China is really doing this because] high-speed railways are symbol of the country's
economic power . . . increasing prosperity . . . [and] political influence." (1) In other words,
China is building its high-speed rail network to (a) show off, and (b) to gain political influence
over other nations. A lie attached to a truth. The first statement is true - that China is making
high-speed rail the travel mode of choice, but the attached statements are rubbish, insulting
claims presented without a shred of supporting evidence. But in the mental logic of an
unschooled reader, the lie attached to the truth is generally accepted, unquestioningly, as also
true.

59
Here is another excerpt from CNN, this one even more startling in its claim:

The first statement of the polls is undoubtedly true, but the attached claim is obviously rubbish,
yet readers will generally accept the entire paragraph as true. So, the reason people don't like
me is not because you have been publishing lies about me but because I have been objecting
to the lies you tell. "A Pew Research report from late 2020 found that of 14 countries surveyed
across Europe, North America and East Asia, everyone had a majority negative view of China.
But opinions of China were worsening even before the pandemic . . . and [this began] in 2019
when top [Chinese] diplomats began aggressively calling out alleged slights against China in
press conferences or on social media." (2) Do you see what has happened? The Jewish-owned
media and (largely) Jewish columnists trashed China relentlessly for all of 2020, with Pew
cheerfully noting that all surveyed countries had a negative view of China. However, the reason
for this negative view wasn't the incessant attacks on China in the public media, but instead
was due to Chinese diplomats "aggressively calling out" these false claims and insults. A lie
attached to a truth.

The above two examples taken from thousands similar in my files, are simply hate literature,
preparing the public to accept severe political or military action based on 'a thousand cuts'. But
there is another category potentially much more serious, related to the covering-up of crimes
committed by our International Cabal of Gangsters (ICG). The propaganda tactics and the
devastation of logic are very similar, as is the naive credulity of readers. In these cases, we
also have (a) a simple statement that appears intuitively plausible, (b) a complete lack of
information and detail, and (c) a ridiculous conclusion either presented outright or at least
insinuated, but entirely without support. Again, in modified form, a lie attached to a truth.

I assembled some typical examples for presentation here, and was surprised to see they all
related to biological attacks. Each is a startling example of an 'official narrative' that cannot
possibly be true, yet so cleverly done that each event raised no discernible challenges from the
vast readership of the mass media. Each is almost certainly an example of high crimes
perpetrated by our ICG and being covered up by their media friends, yet no one apparently
noticed. Such is the power of clever propaganda. Hence the subtitle of this essay: All you need
to do is think. Let's look at these in turn.

60
 UK Foot and Mouth Disease

In Part 1 of this series I referred to the two epidemics of UK foot and mouth disease that
resulted in the culling of millions of cattle and bankrupting most small farmers. I covered this
in detail in an earlier article (3) which I recommend you read. The official narrative was that
"Animal Rights Activists" entered the biological labs at Pirbright and Porton Down and stole
"some vials" (note the framing) of the pathogen and spread it throughout the country. This is
our simple statement that appears intuitively plausible, but presented with a complete lack of
information or detail. The 'truth' was the outbreak of the disease; the lie attached to it was
about the perpetrators. However, both Pirbright and Porton Down are Level-4 Military bio-
weapons laboratories under 24-hour military guard. No 'activist', animal-rights or otherwise,
could possibly penetrate such an installation without being shot dead in the attempt. Second,
a 'vial' is a tiny glass bottle containing maybe 10 ml. of fluid, something you could easily put
into your pocket. But the deadly pathogen was spread throughout the entire nation and
infected many millions of cattle, which would require several thousand liters of the
pathogen. You cannot accomplish that with a 'vial', and you cannot carry it on a bicycle. So
now we have our animal-rights activists approaching a forbidden, off-limits, deadly-force
environment, backing up a 5-tonne truck, loading it with several cubic meters of a deadly
pathogen, and driving away not only unmolested but apparently unnoticed. Further, we must
have had thousands of activists to cover all of England and infect the millions of animals on
virtually every small farm in the country. Even more, they must have been wearing Harry Potter
invisibility cloaks because they did all that unseen and undetected. Why does this story
make sense to you? And so far, we haven't required facts; we are simply using logic.

Would the story make more sense if the media had told you that for three months prior to this
outbreak, departments of the UK government were scouring the nation for all sources
of timber that could be burned to incinerate diseased animals? It wasn't even much of
a secret. Would the story make more sense if the media had told you that according to papers
leaked from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the UK government had made a 'dry run'
of precisely this event only a few months beforehand? Very similar to Event 201 prior to
the outbreak of COVID-19, if you're interested in coincidences. Would the story also make
more sense if we learned that one or two Big Agra companies suddenly appeared in the
aftermath to take control of more or less the entire beef supply of the UK?

61
 China's "Pork Speculators"

In 2019 and 2020 China was hit with a nation-wide wave of deadly swine flu, necessitating the
culling of several hundred million pigs - China's main meat source. The pathogen was
distributed with small drones flying over countless thousands of farms while spraying
something. The outbreak was the truth; the attached lie was again related to the perpetrators.
All of the Western media, including Hong Kong in this instance, flooded their pages with claims
that 'pork speculators' were responsible for this. Let's ignore facts for the moment and try to
apply some logic.

First, many laboratories in many countries research such pathogens, but the amounts
necessary for research typically are a cupful. The volume of pathogen necessary to infect
and\or kill 300 million pigs would be at least tens of thousands of liters. Where would
our 'pork speculators' obtain such a volume of a deadly pathogen? The nearest 7-11? Wal-
Mart? The only source of any pathogen in that volume would be a military bio-weapons lab
where it was created for use. There is no evidence that China has any such labs but for the
moment let's assume they do have. How would the pork speculators gain access to it? What do
you suppose would happen if you and I went to such a military installation and said, "Good
morning. We would like to buy 5,000 liters of anthrax, please." Exactly. And if the Chinese did
have such a facility they would be unlikely to supply people wanting to kill most or all of their
own country's meat supply.

Perhaps more to the point, in any country, WHO would have access to these facilities and the
pathogens contained therein? Only agencies of that government. Nobody else. Logic permits
us to dismiss the possibility of the pathogen arising from a Chinese facility, so what would be
the source? We don't have a smoking gun, but China and Russia are surrounded by 400
American military bio-weapons labs. There is no other likely source, and no other country
with a likely motive or with ample experience in this area, which means the swine flu epidemic
in China was either quite or very possibly a US biological weapons attack. And the media flood
of 'pork speculators' was propaganda meant to pre-empt rational thought on the part of
readers. The lie attached to the truth, to protect the perpetrators (ICG) and blame the
victim.

62
 Let's Look at SARS

We don't know how SARS was created and released, but we do know the official narrative as
presented in the Western media was a lie from beginning to end. And if the media are
promulgating a lie, we know they are covering for those responsible. Why else would they do
it? I covered this in detail in an earlier article you may care to read. (4) Let's look at only one
part of the SARS epidemic, the "super-spreading event" at the Amoy Gardens residential
complex of 30 and 40-story buildings, home to almost 20,000 people that experienced a
massive outbreak and had to be evacuated. Virologists were unanimous in categorising this as
"the most spectacular event" of the entire SARS crisis.

The official (Western media) narrative flood told us the virus was spread through defects in the
building complex’s drainage or sewage system, Wikipedia adding poetically that the virus "was
blown by a gentle maritime breeze" from the toilet sewage pipes into the stairwells and thence
to all the apartments. We don't need facts here; we just need to use our heads.

What would be the source of the huge amount of SARS pathogen required to infect
all those buildings? What would be its means of locomotion, and why would it choose to
gather in volume in that one location? And how could it do so? Do SARS viruses form flocks?
By what means would such a huge amount of this coronavirus enter the sewage systems in the
first place? The sewers are all underground; there is no entry point. How could a breeze, 'gentle
maritime' or otherwise, possibly enter the sewage system of a huge apartment complex? Is
there a hole in the external wall where all the toilet pipes emerge? Next, to blow air and
pathogen from an underground sewer upwards to infect all apartments on 40 floors of 10
buildings would require more than a gentle breeze - more likely a hurricane.

I am not a plumber, but a "defective sewage system" in a high-end high-rise apartment building
does not seem to possess the claimed qualifications to distribute lethal pathogens to all
apartments. In any case, aside from the initial – and unsubstantiated – claim, there were no
63
reports either before or after the outbreak to suggest any plumbing defects ever existed. Once
again, to a casual reader the story sounds plausible until we stop to think about the practical
logistics. After all, sewage and drainage pipes are no doubt dirty places which make a happy
home for germs of all kinds, but those germs are there because we put them there each time
we dispose of waste. They don’t enter a building and seek out the drainage pipes of their own
accord, then run around independently like mice looking for a place to hide, and lurking until
victims approach. Nor do they spread throughout a building and intentionally enter each home.
Either case would require an intelligence. And a large pail.

Would it have assisted your understanding if the media had informed you of the immediate
conclusion by Russian virologists that the SARS virus "absolutely" originated in a lab? It was
interesting that while SARS emerged first in Guangdong Province, fate led the
infected persons to travel to Hong Kong where the virus spread. The health officials in
the Chinese Mainland snuffed it out immediately while Hong Kong took the hit, and SARS was
statistically a Hong Kong epidemic rather than Mainland Chinese. That almost sounds like an
attempt that failed.

64
 Let's Look at MERS

In late 2012, the world experienced the onset of a new mini-epidemic from a novel coronavirus
that was named MERS because it supposedly originated in the Middle East, infecting small
numbers of people in Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Qatar. The virus was blamed on camels which,
after millennia of friendly cohabitation with man, suddenly decided to share their virology with
humans. I covered this in detail in an earlier article you may care to read. (5)

The outbreak in Korea was the largest manifestation of MERS outside the Middle East, hitting
that country with economic damage in the billions. According to the official narrative in the
Western media, South Korea’s infections were apparently traced to an (unidentified and almost
certainly fictitious) "businessman" who developed MERS after returning from a trip to the
Middle East. We have our (quite plausible) opening statements followed by conclusions offering
zero detail, in fact truth followed by a lie.

One item neglected by the media was the massive outbreak of MERS at the US Osan
Air Base in Korea, which conveniently was very near the home of the likely-imaginary
'infected businessman'. The Osan airbase is the home of the US JUPITR ATD, a military
biological program that operates its other lab facility at Fort Detrick, MD, as well as home to
one of the US military’s bio-weapons production labs and a very secretive WHO bio-lab operated
by the US military. The theory most closely fitting the facts is that the MERS outbreak may
have been caused by a laboratory accident at the JUPITR biowarfare project, and our
'infected businessman' may in fact have carried the pathogen in the opposite direction.

Interestingly, there was sparse coverage of the MERS outbreak in South Korea, certainly
compared to SARS, where we were treated to virulent China-bashing 24/7 for most of a year.

65
 Let's Look at ZIKA

Countries with confirmed Zika virus cases. Data from WHO February 2016. Source

An unremarkable little virus so mild most people don't even know they have it, and one that
had never done any harm to anyone. ZIKA is spread only by mosquitoes and never traveled
anywhere in its entire life, remaining sequestered in a forest in Uganda where it was discovered.
But then one day ZIKA developed a kind of viral wanderlust and traveled 12,000 kilometers or
so, crossing the Pacific Ocean, the US and Mexico, all of Central America and the Caribbean,
and finally traversing all of South America to land on the Atlantic side in Rio and São Paulo.
From there, it almost instantaneously radiated outward 4,000 or 5,000 kilometers in all
directions to cover most of Brazil, then spread to all of South and Central America and the
Caribbean, flooding more than 20 countries within a few months, voyaging as far as Mexico
and Puerto Rico.

How did this happen? Well, according to the massive flood in the Western media, ZIKA was
brought to Brazil by an infected traveler from Micronesia who had come to watch the World
Cup. The plausible lie attached to the truth. And again, we don't need facts; we just need
to use our heads. ZIKA is not a contagious disease; it is spread only when bitten by an
infected mosquito. If the (fictional) traveler had indeed been infected, how many millions of
mosquitoes would have had to bite this unfortunate Micronesian to become infected and then
infect millions throughout Latin America within a very short time? To cause such a rapid
outbreak would require hundreds of millions of infected mosquitoes. Even more, how could
infected mosquitoes traverse all of South America? Can mosquitoes fly over the Andes? How
could they travel 10,000 or more Kms. to flood 20 countries in a few months? How did they
travel the 12,000 Kms. to Brazil in the first place? You know the official story cannot possibly
be true.

66
ZIKA was given massive prime time Western media coverage, replete with photos of
graveyards, tombstones, urns filled with wilting flowers. Why? The number of people who had
experienced even mild illness from ZIKA was perilously close to zero, and no person had ever
died from it. What was happening?

Two things. First, something that was heavily censored in the Western media: a UK company
named Oxitec had for several years been conducting "transgenic mosquito trials" throughout
Latin America, pretending to mate their mosquitoes with the local variety to produce sterile
offspring, releasing hundreds of millions of mosquitoes in all countries. It was then that the
outbreak of ZIKA occurred.

The second thing was that ZIKA was being tarnished with tales of brain damage to infants,
tales entirely lacking medical or logical foundation, but propagated nonetheless. On the heels
of these tales, and interspersed with them, was the sudden awakening or resurrection of
literally hundreds of US-based and funded NGOs all campaigning loudly - with massive media
support - for all of Latin America to abandon its laws against abortion - for the sake of all these
ZIKA-infected mothers who would now give birth to infants with "devastated brains".

And that is the entire story. The pro-abortionist NGOs are primarily Jewish, as are the media,
and as is Oxitec with its funding and connections naturally including the usual group of suspects.
The only conclusion that fits all the known facts is that ZIKA was deliberately unleashed, using
pre-infected mosquitoes, as part of a plan to eliminate the anti-abortion laws in Latin America
- the world's only holdout. I researched this thoroughly and covered it in an earlier article which
may interest you. (6)

67
 Beijing COVID-19

By late May of 2020, Beijing had been virus-free for nearly 60 days. I recall having an
uncomfortable feeling that this wasn't the end, my fears justified when Beijing experienced a
new outbreak in the Xinfadi market. (7) The media immediately hit us with a small flood of
propaganda that Beijing was experiencing its "second wave" - a characteristic of COVID-19
that had been heavily promulgated by the media in spite of the clear fact that NO epidemic
in history has ever exhibited second or third or fourth natural 'waves'. We were also
hit with repeated claims that "China's wet markets" were a natural breeding ground for
pathogens, and that this latest outbreak "showed how the virus can still come back as
restrictions are eased". (8)

The Western media went silent rather quickly with the announcement from the intensive
investigation of "a groundbreaking virus tracing discovery", which was that the strain of
the new virus in Beijing was the same as that in much of Europe, that this variety had never
before been detected in China and was clearly an import. Dr. Daniel Lucey confirmed a
Reuters report on the genetic sequencing that "the virus is from a different continent",
and thus was clearly imported. (9) It was also much more contagious - and more deadly -
than previous varieties.

The media did note that the Xinfadi market was the largest fresh-food market in all of Asia,
filling more than one square kilometer and equivalent to nearly 160 football fields, with many
thousands of shops. But they failed to tell us that virtually the entire market was "severely
contaminated" while nothing in the surrounding area was touched. It was obvious the
contamination entered the market - and only the market - from a source external to
China, definitely unrelated to bats or other 'wildlife'.

The propaganda framing and tactics are instructive: we were already conditioned to accept
'second waves' in spite of these being a media fiction, and also pre-conditioned to
accept that these markets are unsanitary - even when they aren't. But given the lies

68
attached to a truth, and given no detail, our mental processes accept as true the conclusions
desired by the media.

The lack of logic, however, is glaring. How can a very different variety of a virus travel from
another continent to Beijing without leaving infections along the way? And this new virus was
traveling with friends if it could infect 160 football fields in a couple of days. Virus
outbreaks always begin on a very small scale, and then expand, so what would be the source
of such a huge amount of pathogen released in one place at one time? And why would it cross
half of China, choosing to land on and infect only that one location in Beijing, the largest
market in all of Asia with hundreds of thousands of visitors each day, while sparing
every other possible victim? That would almost require an intelligence. And a large pail.
To forestall such conclusions, the Western media placed a news embargo on this topic
immediately upon the facts being released. We are left with the uncomfortable feeling that the
Western news media were issuing propaganda meant to cover for their friends in the ICG.

69
 China COVID-19

Distribution of Patients with Covid-19 across Mainland China. Source

I will dwell here on only one media propaganda topic, that of the source and distribution of
COVID-19 in China. The Western media, beginning with Radio Free Asia, were at first
unanimous in the virus 'leaking' from the labs at Wuhan University, but when China
counter-attacked with Fort Detrick, the narrative changed to bats. This was so true that
even the US social media censored anyone suggesting a lab origin for the virus. We have now
turned 180 degrees, with the lab origin again on the table and Facebook welcoming posts on
Wuhan (but not Fort Detrick). Presumably, blaming bats is now prohibited.

This new 'examination' was prompted largely by Nicholas Wade, a former New York Times
science writer, who performed a detailed investigation proving that the case for a lab leak was
scientifically strong although, like all others, he focuses only on a release from Wuhan but not
from Fort Detrick which would be more plausible for many reasons.

70
In terms of media propaganda, the process is similar: a lie attached to a truth. In spite of all
prior attempts and a great amount of media noise, there was never a shred of evidence
presented to document the possibility that the virus escaped from the Wuhan lab. But
we are now fed a new item - that the US has a huge volume of "intelligence" which has
apparently not been examined, but which will now be critically appraised for proof and evidence
of China's 'guilt'.

Once again, all we need to do is think. For 18 months, the US, through the media, made intense
and unremitting efforts to blame China for the outbreak. Is it really possible that during all that
feverish prosecution the CIA and State Department sat on a "treasure trove" of intelligence
which might have proved China's guilt, but somehow didn't bother to check? Such an
assumption is completely devoid of logic. The more sensible assumption is that everything was
examined from every possible point of view, and logic would suggest that this latest ploy by
Biden will produce nothing but more media noise. The best defense is a good offense.

To add a bit of fuel to the fire, the US State Department claims - with no evidence again - that
"several scientists" at Wuhan were hospitalised at the onset of the outbreak with "what
appeared to be" COVID-19 symptoms, as if they would know. But this "almost proves" it was
China's fault after all. The Chinese authorities have stated firmly that the above claim is not
true, that no one from the Wuhan lab was ill or hospitalised, but the Western media ignore this
or discount it as Communist propaganda. In this case, a lie attached to another lie.

I would be remiss in not mentioning the greatest leap of all in the logic of the Western media
narrative of this event: that an accidental escape of a pathogen would occur in one of China's
main transportation hubs with literally tens of millions of travelers leaving or passing through
on the eve of China's annual migration - the world's largest - where perhaps 600 million people
might be traveling home for Chinese New Year. If I were a pathogen wanting to escape
confinement, I couldn't do better. Utilising this one location at that time would
virtually guarantee an instant nationwide epidemic of biblical proportion, spreading
the infection throughout the entire country with the potential to set China's economy
back 30 years in one swoop. That would almost require an intelligence. And a large pail.

This story has not yet reached its final chapter.

71
 China's 6 Bio-attacks

It hasn't been reported in the West, but China suffered a total of 6 biological attacks within two
years, the swine flu and COVID-19 being only two. There were various concentrated outbreaks
of bird flu, some of very deadly pathogens, and none of which had a clear natural source. The
question is, why China? The media propaganda narrative suggests China lacks sanitary
cohesion, but the truth is that most countries in Asia are well below China in sanitation, India
being perhaps the worst example. Logic encourages us to ask why India doesn't have dozens
of pathogen outbreaks, and why all these epidemics occurred only in China. And of course logic
also induces us to ask who has 400 biological weapons labs surrounding China and
Russia.

72
 Notes

(1) https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/china-high-speed-rail-cmd/index.html
(2) https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/02/china/xi-jinping-beijing-diplomacy-wolf-warriors-intl-mic-
hnk/index.html
(3) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/06/larry-romanoff-uk-foot-and-mouth.html
(4) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2021/01/sp-larry-romanoff-sars-november-16-2020.html
(5) http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/mers-november-18-2020/
(6) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/06/larry-romanoff-zika-june-12-2020.html
(7) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/06/covid-19-china-reseeded-with-covid-20.html
(8) https://news.yahoo.com/beijing-closes-market-locks-down-113540088.html
(9) https://sciencespeaksblog.org/2020/06/14/covid-19-in-beijing-a-new-outbreak-linked-with-large-
market-xinfadi/

73
I stated in earlier articles that we are subjected – more often than we might imagine – to news
articles that were entirely fictitious, reporting on news events that either never occurred, or
where the description bore no resemblance to the actual event. One of the most common ploys
is to fabricate an event – usually an atrocity tale of some nature – and use an unrelated and
misleading photo as evidence. CNN is famous for this tactic and, when challenged, invariably
offers one of two responses: (a) ‘Okay, so we accidentally mis-captioned a photo. Big deal.”,
or (b) “It doesn’t matter. The photo was editorially relevant.” These are not accidental; they
serve as vital evidence for the fabricated story, and depend immensely on the ignorance of
Americans and Westerners generally.

One of many that may be well-known was the flurry of stories of Chinese policemen brutalising
the poor Tibetans (again). But a close look at the photo reveals that neither the policemen nor
the ‘victims’ were ethnic Chinese but were Nepalese, clearly in Nepal police uniforms. The
videos and still shots were produced by the CIA from their Disney-scripted propaganda
narrative meant to increase worldwide disaffection for China. It was entirely a made-in-
Hollywood fabricated action scene. No such event had ever occurred.
74
 Cropping, Cutting and Pasting

A quick glance at this photo clearly indicates the options available by simple cropping, whether
that photo is staged or genuine.

The photo below fills an empty stadium with fans. The US is famous (CNN, the White House)
for cutting and pasting a photo of full seats at the UN when a US official gives an ideological
speech to a nearly-empty house. The White House does the same in reverse too, pasting in a
photo of an empty assembly room when Iran’s President gives a speech to a full house. Keep
in mind that the Western media “have no obligation to tell the truth”.

75
One of the more famous was the toppling of Saddam Hussein’s statue in Tahrir Square,
ostensibly celebrating the freeing of Iraqis from tyranny. The cropped photos and video
released by the CIA and Pentagon showed a number of Iraqi citizens pulling on ropes tied to
the statue, eventually bringing it crashing to the ground. It was a pathetic, but successful,
fabrication. The Square had been cleared and a crane brought in, from which the ropes were
tied to the statue. Then, a group of Iraqis pulled on the ropes while the crane pushed the statue
off its pedestal, at which point several hundred clearly bewildered Iraqis did what they had
been paid to do, and cheered loudly as the statue fell. Just another Hollywood production, but
one which apparently satisfied the bulk of the American population that their military’s
destruction of Iraq was a deed of honor.

Another of interest is the photo and video of bin Laden supposedly claiming responsibility for
9-11, a falsehood in its entirety, staged by the CIA using a man who bore only the most
superficial resemblance to bin Laden, but sufficient to satisfy most Americans that Iraq should
be invaded and its resources confiscated – ignoring the fact that Iraq had never had any
relations with bin Laden.
76
A related photo is that of the ‘bin Laden situation room’ where the White House staff watched
‘by special satellite link’ the Alice in Wonderland tale of the killing of bin Laden. The claim was
quickly denounced by experts everywhere as ‘a ridiculous technical impossibility’, and
Obama later admitted the photo was staged, but most Americans apparently believed the story
anyway. There are many such misrepresented events in the mass media files.

Certainly the most successful of these completely false propaganda victories was the story of
the “Tiananmen Square Massacre”, perhaps the most famous event that never occurred. If
this is news to you, you might want to say, “But I saw the photographs”.
77
Yes, well, I saw the same photos and anyone with even a passing familiarity with Beijing would
know that none of those photos were taken in Tiananmen Square. They were of an
entirely unrelated event, a series of terrorist measures arranged by the CIA and coordinated
by the US Embassy in Beijing.

As evidence of this latter claim, the leaders of that intensely violent episode were unable to
escape Beijing and took sanctuary in the US Embassy, the Chinese government media for weeks
decrying the American protection of these terrorists and demanding their release. It didn’t
happen; the US found a way to spirit all those men out of China unharmed. The photos you
should have seen – also not of Tiananmen Square, were of the violence perpetrated by
those terrorists, including the burning to death of a great many young Chinese
soldiers – which was when the military was sent in.

This story is still almost too surprising to believe even today, but it was entirely – 100% – a
lie, but so successful it has been celebrated by the Western media in ‘anniversary’
remembrances for more than 30 years.

78
One fact deeply buried was that a Spanish TV crew was in the Square for the entirety of
that night, and filmed the peaceful clearing of the Square – film that has been vigorously
suppressed for more than 30 years and is only now becoming available on the
internet. Much too late to affect memories or convictions.

I have covered this in an article which is extensively documented, and with all the details, an
article which I believe is generally accepted as the definitive work on this topic, at least in
English. You can read it here if you are interested. (1)

It’s worth noting that even today, websites like WordPress or Google’s Blogger will not permit
the real photos of this 1989 event to be displayed, indicating that rather severe censorship of
this event is still operative. I am including here three of the photos that may never have been
seen, of some of the carnage inflicted by these American terrorists in Beijing, and one of the
many soldiers burned to death by the thousands of petrol bombs unleashed. There was indeed
an event in Beijing on June 4, 1989, but the details were viciously suppressed while an entirely
false story was propagated by the media worldwide, heavily supported by photographs that
were in no way what they purported to be. It is worth a moment of thought to consider
the power of those behind this event, to have accomplished what they did.

79
 China’s Jasmine Revolution

Former US Ambassador Jon Huntsman

It’s interesting that perhaps sometimes we should believe what we read. Or, if not us, the
psychopaths who populate the White House, in this case the solid position of China’s
government in relation to the people. Polls have repeatedly revealed that around 90% to 95%
of the people in China have a high level of trust in and respect for their national government
and leaders, China ranking first in the world in this regard while the US is near the bottom.
Such polls were taken, for our purposes, in January of 2011, widely reported at the time, with
an article in the Economist bemoaning the fact that “a disconcertingly high percentage of
China’s population appear very happy with their government”, or words to that effect.

However, in 2011, our International Cabal of Gangsters (ICG), fronted by the US and
disbelieving these statistics, attempted to provoke the Chinese people to a “Jasmine
revolution”. At that time, the entire Chinese social media landscape was flooded – and I mean
flooded – by what were almost certainly CIA sock puppets calling on all Chinese to protest
against their “brutal totalitarian government”. The calls were for these gatherings to occur
in 13 major cities but with the focus on Beijing where all citizens were urgently entreated to
gather in Wangfujing (a major downtown shopping area) to “peacefully protest”.
Unfortunately for the Americans, the Chinese had no such interest and nobody showed up,
80
other than the usual shoppers. The only participant was then-US Ambassador Jon Huntsman
who came to view the (non-existent) results of his handiwork. Huntsman was immediately
recognised, confronted and so ridiculed by the crowd that he put his tail between his legs and
ran for cover. (2)

The attempt to incite a color revolution in China was an abject failure, but for those who spin
the news this didn’t qualify as even a minor setback. If CNN can run a fake story and support
it by ‘accidentally’ mis-captioning a few photographs, surely the US Embassy and the CIA, with
their unlimited resources, can do better, thus ‘capturing the hearts and minds’ of good people
everywhere. Here are a few of my favorites:

This is an article that ran in the Norwegian newspaper VG and its online edition, displaying
Chinese people rioting in the streets, demanding ‘freedom’ and ‘human rights’. Even if you
can’t read Norwegian, you can understand the headline telling you of the ‘revolution in
China’. But, if you examine the green placards, and you can read Chinese, you’ll recognise the
words for “Taiwan”, and the political party slogans on the banners, with text indicating this is
a pro-DPP political party rally in Taiwan. Nevertheless, it was borrowed by our media moguls
and circulated worldwide as proof of the violent political demonstrations in China.

81
This is from an article in the Ireland Independent, on February 20, 2011, telling us people were
shouting, “We want food, we want jobs” – All slogans that highlight ‘common complaints’
among ‘ordinary Chinese’. According to AP, the photo shows “Chinese authorities cracking down
on activists amid a call for ‘Jasmine Revolution’ protests”. (AP) Unfortunately, this
Reuters photo was taken at an anti-Japanese demonstration in Lanzhou city (Gansu
province) on December 24, 2010.

I’m told it was CNN that clipped this photo from an article in Taiwan’s Liberty Times to show
yet more proof that the Chinese are rioting in the streets, yelling “we want food’, we
want jobs”. However, the photo was of a job fair in Shenzhen more than a year prior, and
those who can read Chinese will see that the placards say things like “Seeking workers” and
“Hiring people today”. But the photo was ‘editorially relevant’ to the fabricated story, and
few Americans or Europeans can read Chinese.

This one is my favorite. For background, you should know that Beijing’s climate in winter is not
quite as bad as Inuvik, but it’s not exactly Tahiti, either.

82
The article is from a German newspaper that featured a story on China’s internal turmoil,
containing a purported photo of the police crushing a demonstration in Beijing in front of the
McDonald’s at Wangfujing at the end of February, 2011. Unfortunately, they cropped the photo
so we can’t see the good parts of the ‘beaten-to-a-pulp’ protestors. But if we examine the photo
we note some odd features. For one, the policemen are wearing short-sleeved shirts, and if we
look in the background we see green grass, pretty flowers, and tropical trees. This, in Beijing,
in the middle of winter? Not likely. The photo is actually of some young police recruits
receiving training for civil disturbances in a parking lot next to a police station in Nanjing in the
summer of 2005. But once again, editorially relevant.

83
 A Lie of Omission is still a Lie

Virtually every article appearing in the Western media about China is either false or so corrupted
by the twisting of facts and/or the omission of critical details, as to give uninformed readers a
perception that is 180 degrees from the truth. This applies not only to China, but to all nations
on the current ‘Axis of Evil’ list.

In Part 1 of this series I wrote of opinion-based articles which contained a few truths and many
lies, articles that provide no detail or omit crucial details. I wrote that these may be difficult for
you to identify without some research of your own, and that I would provide some examples.
Here are two:

84
 China: Bullying to Prosperity

I will begin with John Bussey who is the American Associate Editor of The Wall Street Journal,
and was also a commentator at Fox News. In an article in the Wall Street Journal titled, “China:
Bullying to Prosperity” (3), Bussey won a Nobel Prize for dishonest and unethical reporting.
(The WSJ seems to have deleted this article, but it has been archived on other websites and
still available). This was his article in part:

“Watching China bully Wal-Mart Stores this week – and watching Wal-Mart prostrate itself under
the beating – is an embarrassing reminder of a simple fact: China, the world’s fastest growing
major market, has the upper hand with U.S. business. Its array of protectionist barriers, weak
rule of law, and siren-like market make events like this all but inevitable. In the company’s
stores in the city of Chongqing, nonorganic pork was labeled “organic.” This was the mistake.
The pork was otherwise fine. Seizing on this error at a time when inflation is a hot-button issue
in China, officials accused Wal-Mart of cheating the public by charging premium prices for
regular meat. They fined the company, shut down all 13 Wal-Marts in the city and jailed a
number of Wal-Mart employees. The actions played well in the national media. There’s little if
any recourse in authoritarian China when something like this happens to a U.S. company. There
aren’t regular courts. Like many other U.S. firms that have run afoul of nationalist sentiments
in China, Wal-Mart could only beg forgiveness. It has nearly 350 stores in China with revenue
of $7.5 billion. So Wal-Mart dropped to its knees.” He finished with an astonishing claim where
he cleverly quoted a (non-existent) “American executive in Beijing who watches these matters”
who supposedly said Wal-Mart had done far more than Chinese companies “to secure the safety
of the [country’s] food supply.”.

We should all feel sorry for Wal-Mart, with only $7.5 billion in revenue in China, though we do
have a question about how China, with a weak rule of law, can simultaneously enforce those
weak laws to make international giants fall to their knees.

Bussey’s story is not exactly how it was. Wal-Mart is a famous criminal corporation in
China, the authorities having had years of trouble with Wal-Mart repeatedly seeming to violate

85
most laws on the books. Those same stores had for years been selling ordinary pork labeled as
organic, each time being caught and fined a trivial amount, 8 times in the prior 7 months alone.
It was so bad that when the inspectors were leaving the store with the confiscated illegal
products, Wal-Mart’s staff were already busy labeling yet more ordinary pork as organic. It was
just a game where the retail price was several times higher and the profits so huge that the
nuisance of inspectors was trivial. What changed the game was that this last time the inspectors
made a wrong turn as they were leaving the store, and found themselves in a refrigerated
locker with 75,000 kilograms of ordinary pork labeled as organic. That was when they
decided enough was enough, arrested all the senior executives and shuttered the
stores. But according to the WSJ’s Bussey, a low-level clerk made an innocent “mistake” and
mislabeled a few packages of meat, the Chinese authorities ‘playing to the public’. And of course
because China has no courts Wal-Mart could do no better than beg forgiveness and fall to its
knees.

It is worth noting the lies attached to one small truth: In China, there is no recourse, China has
no regular courts, China’s protectionist barriers, weak rule of law, Wal-Mart wasn’t punished
for massive fraud, but for ‘running afoul of nationalist sentiment’. And Wal-Mart was innocently
‘securing the safety of China’s food supply’.

86
 China Imprisons yet another Human Rights Lawyer

Li Wenzu, the wife of imprisoned lawyer Wang Quanzhang, reacts before an interview at her home in
Beijing. Wang, a prominent Chinese human rights lawyer, was sentenced on Jan. 28, 2019 to 4 1/2 years
in prison for state subversion. Source

In a similar instance, the Western media stridently reported ad nauseum, that a Chinese
human-rights lawyer had (once again) been imprisoned by “The Communist Party”, ostensibly
for daring to be a human-rights lawyer in China. But once again, that’s not exactly how it was.

It was true this lawyer had on one occasion acted for someone with a complaint about the
system, the story being weaved in the Western press that he was unjustly tossed into prison
for daring to assist a challenge against the “authoritarian Chinese dictatorship”. I followed this
one closely and in only one article of nearly 100 that I read on this particular case in the Western
press, was there even a suggestion of an extenuating circumstance. In only one article, the
very last sentence made vague passing mention of a tax problem.

That “tax problem” was a bit more than nothing. In China, there are various classifications of
purchase receipts, only one of which is usable for corporate expense tax deductions. In many
Western countries, even a cash register receipt is usable in this regard, but in China we must
have an official receipt containing a government stamp. Since these receipts are equivalent to
a tax credit of 25%, they are valuable and are sometimes traded. If I have official tax receipts
my company cannot use, I can sell them to you at 10% of face value and you can save 15%
on your corporate income taxes.In this case, this ‘human-rights lawyer’ and four of his friends,
all lawyers, had been for years running a business of printing counterfeit tax receipts and selling
them to unsuspecting businesses, in total more than $300 million worth. All five were
arrested and thrown into prison but, according to the media, this lead lawyer (only) was
imprisoned not by the courts, but by “the Communist Party”, and not for a massive
counterfeiting fraud but for defending the poor and helpless. I was told that US reporters
rummaged through the client records of the lead lawyer in this case until they discovered a
minor civil matter that would permit them to categorise this man as a human-rights lawyer,
and it was around this that they built their story.
87
 Canada’s two Michaels: Michael Kovrig and Michael
Spavor

Then we have the curious story of two Canadians, one a “former diplomat”, the other a
“businessman”, both of whom were arrested and imprisoned in China for espionage. (4) (5) (6)
According to Canada’s National Post, both had been “enjoying success in very different fields
when apprehended”. Further, “At the time of his arrest, Kovrig worked full-time for the
International Crisis Group in North East Asia. Working from Hong Kong, he was tasked with
defusing tensions between China and nearby states, and with giving a fresh, independent
appraisal of China’s growing role in the world . . .” Already I have questions.

Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the two men have been “arbitrarily” detained by
the Chinese, likely in retaliation for Canada’s arrest of Meng Wanzhou of Huawei – who is still
being held without charge after two years. The international pressure has been almost
deafening:

* More than 220 statesmen, politicians, ex-diplomats, academics and directors of research
centers from 19 countries published a call in Canada’s Globe & Mail for China’s President Xi to
free Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor.

* Fifteen leaders of U.S. foreign policy think tanks, independent advocacy organisations and
academic research institutions have issued a joint statement on 10 March calling for Kovrig’s
immediate release.

* Another open letter by 60 Australian scholars and analysts asked the Australian Government
without further delay to support Canada’s call for the immediate release of these two detainees.

* The directors of six Berlin-based policy institutions said in a joint statement . . .”

88
Nobody makes that much noise without having a powerful vested interest in
protecting their ‘assets’.

Given the espionage sensitivity of the case, little detail has been made public, but a bit of
research and some logic can substitute for the lack of hard facts. First, notice the framing;
Kovrig was never a ‘diplomat’, but was instead a low-level consular trouble-maker operating
between China and Hong Kong, attracting the attention of the authorities for “activities not in
keeping with the stated job function”. Second, Kovrig took a sudden voluntary leave of absence
to move to the International Crisis Group in Hong Kong, most likely for more freedom of
movement and certainly with the complicity of the Canadian government. This Group bills itself
as a Brussels-based non-governmental organization that “works to build a more peaceful world”
and to prevent international crises, but in fact looks to cause them, a kind of color-revolution
company financed by Western governments and people like George Soros while
masquerading as a world peace organisation.

Next, why would a low-level Canadian consular staff member with absolutely no
relevant qualifications at that level, be tasked – by the Americans – with “de-
escalating tensions between Washington and Pyongyang”? Especially while Washington
is simultaneously escalating those same tensions. He was also tasked with “defusing
tensions between China and nearby states”, according to the organization’s website.
That sounds more like a job for Superman instead of a high-school graduate. Who would
possibly believe that, while being paid by the US and our European Deep State, this man’s
function would be to defuse tensions between China and its neighbors when it is abundantly
clear their only intent is to create as much tension as humanly possible. Spavor is
depicted as “a businessman with deep ties to North Korea”, focused on opening up
international ties with the insular country, and looking to promote greater “peace,
friendship, and understanding” with North Korea. Surely there are no people anywhere
in the world who might believe such a story – other than Canadians.

As I mentioned, very few facts emerged on this case, other than that the hearings and trials
were heavily restricted with no foreign consular or legal representatives permitted. This is
typical in all cases that actually involve sensitive espionage; no government invites the enemy
into a courtroom where all the details of the circumstance are revealed. However, one small
detail did leak out, the fact that part of Spavor’s “research” involved wrapping mobile
phones in plastic and rubber and burying them at the base of a particular tree on the
bank of the little river that forms the border between China and North Korea. That
kind of research activity might raise questions in any country. These two men were definitely
working on the same team, supplying each other with undisclosed information, and almost
certainly working on some plot to cause another explosion between the two Koreas that would
finally permit the US to mass its troops and weapons directly on China’s border. And clearly
with the complicity of the Canadian government who are not so chaste as Canadians
and the world imagine.

I have nearly 1,000 such stories in my files, enough to fill a thick book, and all reprehensibly
dishonest in their presentation. When Westerners have only a diet of daily articles like this
presented to them by their most trusted media, how is it possible for anyone to accurately
understand anything about China?
89
 Notes

(1) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/04/tiananmen-square-failure-of-american.html
(2) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/feb/27/china-jasmine-revolution-beijing-police
(3) https://muckrack.com/john-bussey
(4) https://www.crisisgroup.org/who-we-are/people/michael-kovrig
(5) https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/who-are-michael-kovrig-and-michael-spavor
(6) https://globalnews.ca/news/4751174/michael-kovrig-arrested-china/

90
 Censorship, or Burning the History Books

I have written elsewhere that probably 90%, or even 95%, of everything that you know, or
think that you know, or that you believe to be true about history, is wrong. To state another
way, if we were to take the history of the entire world for the past 500 years and condense it
into a history book of 100 pages, a full 50 of those pages would be blank. That is the extent of
the world's history that has been excised with a vengeance by our International Cabal of
Gangsters (ICG) who don't want you to know. These omissions mostly involve horrendous
crimes against humanity committed by Western Imperialists and the ICG. Of the remaining 50
pages, probably 45 are false in whole or in part, photoshopped, whitewashed, sanitised, and
with many crucial and vital details omitted to confuse us and lead us in wrong directions and
to wrong conclusions.

We normally tend to think of censorship in rather simple terms:

We are told China censors debate on 'sensitive' topics such as Tiananmen Square, or that
discussion on 'democracy' is stifled and more or less prohibited in many countries. In the US,
debates on the dangers of vaccinations, of the US being responsible for COVID-19, of the truths
of Pearl Harbor, are heavily censored though we don't tend to use this adjective, but proponents
of these and other topics are ignored, derided and sometimes vilified. It is widely-known that
Google heavily censors many topics and has 'de-platformed' many authors so that their writing
will not appear on most searches. Facebook and Twitter now actively delete almost everything
not in accordance with the official narrative on almost any topic.

Still, we tend to think of censorship in terms of topic and content rather than people, but when
authors are shunned and condemned for their books, and publishers either forced out of
business or delisted from Amazon and Indigo, that is a higher level of censorship. A few
examples:

91
 David meets Godzilla

Front cover of the February 1995 issue of “Marco Polo” magazine that featured Dr. Nishioka’s ten page
article, “The Greatest Taboo of Postwar World History: There were no Nazi ‘Gas Chambers’.” As a result
of an international Jewish pressure and boycott campaign, the slick 250,OOO-circulation monthly was
killed. Source

Some years back, Marco Polo, a leading Japanese news magazine, published a story stating
"There Were No Nazi Gas Chambers!" in World War II. (1) The magazine and the parent
company were quickly and violently assaulted by the Israeli Embassy, the US Embassy, the
Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Jewish Defense League, and a host of others. Almost
immediately, the parent company announced that all unsold copies of that issue would be
recalled and destroyed, that Marco Polo magazine would permanently cease publication, that
its editor would be transferred and its staff dispersed. Further, the senior official at the parent
company would resign, while others would take hefty salary cuts as personal penance.
Additionally, officials, editors and staff of the parent company would attend a series of seminars
conducted by the Wiesenthal Center to "atone and correct their misconceptions on Jewish
history". And that the company President would personally attend the Simon Wiesenthal
Center in California to "donate" US$50,000 as a kind of fine for the criminal offense of
challenging the Jews' official holocaust narrative. That almost sounds like censorship. Or
extortionate gangsterism. But you might care to ask yourself who has the power to do
this, and what is its source?

92
 James Bacque

James Bacque

James Bacque was a famous author in Canada, having published many novels and books, and
many newspaper and magazine articles. I wrote earlier about Bacque's books, "Other
Losses"(1) and "Crimes and Mercies" (2) which detailed the millions of Germans killed
during the years after the war - in US concentration camps in Germany where they were
starved to death - "Eisenhower's Death Camps". (3) (4) (5) (6) These books were
translated into about 15 languages and very highly regarded in Europe, but the ICG didn't want
this dark secret to be made public. Bacque was vilified in the North American press, bitterly
attacked in the media as a "false historian" whose research was "worse than useless", his
reputation badly damaged in Canada and the US.

I had many conversations with James. He told me he could see that his mail was being opened,
he knew his phone calls were intercepted or monitored. His once favorite book publishers no
longer replied to his messages and favorite magazine and newspaper editors refused to accept
his calls. His entire source of income evaporated almost overnight, he was harassed, his home
broken into and searched, he was hounded nearly to bankruptcy and eventually moved to
Europe because he was afraid of being imprisoned in Canada. That's both censorship and
gangsterism, and again ask yourself who has the power to do this, and what is its
source? How do these people control Canada's intelligence agencies?

93
 Ernst Zundel

Ernst Zundel was a German who emigrated to Canada as a young man and became a successful
writer and publisher. Some years ago, he published an innocent small booklet about the Second
World War that asked whether 6 million Jews really did die in Germany. The offended Jews
pushed the Canadian government to destroy the man; Canada's compliant government
repeatedly charged Zundel with crimes but the courts repeatedly found him innocent. They also
tried him under hate crimes tribunals but again he was found innocent of any wrongdoing. So
the Canadian government put him in prison for two years, in solitary confinement, claiming he
was a "risk to national security" - an obscenely immoral action because there was no
evidence of any kind against the man. (7) His only "crime" was to question the Jews'
assertion about their so-called "holocaust", asking if it were really true that 6 million
Jews died in Germany.

When Canada could no longer pretend Zundel was a threat to national security, the government
deported him to Germany where it is a crime to question the Jews, and he was sentenced to
five years in prison. The man hadn't been to Germany for 40 years and had never committed
any crime in Germany, but the Jews wanted him in prison so the Canadian government
deported him and the German government complied. The man was bankrupted and his life
totally ruined simply because he dared to speak out. Again both censorship and
gangsterism, and again ask yourself who has this power over Canada's courts and
judiciary, over Germany's courts and judiciary, and Canada's intelligence agencies
and Department of Foreign Affairs? What is the source of such power?

94
 Professor Tony Hall

This man was a popular professor at a Canadian University, (8) (9) (10) but he dared to speak
out against the atrocities the Jews are committing in Palestine. The news media in Canada are
all owned and controlled by Jews, as is true in all the West. Hall was bitterly attacked in their
media, his reputation destroyed, and his university forced to fire him – illegally, since he was
a full tenured professor. The man did not do anything wrong. He simply told the truth
about Jewish atrocities. Someone hacked into Hall's social media account and posted a
message saying that all Jews must die. It was proven that Hall had no part in that posting, and
that in fact the account of one of his friends had been hacked, with that secondary account
used to post the message on Hall's hacked account. That didn't save him. The ICG wanted
Hall gone, and he was gone. What threats were made against the University that compelled
them to fire a tenured professor who was fully exonerated by the 'evidence' used to prosecute
him? And by whom were those threats made?

95
 Carroll Quigley

When Quigley published his book "Tragedy and Hope", initial orders were good and the book
promised a large readership and multiple printings, but the publisher informed Quigley that
reprints were on hold since no further orders were forthcoming. This was important because
the copyright remains with the publisher so long as a book is merely out of stock and awaiting
reprinting, but reverts to the author if the book is out of print. As it happened, Quigley waited
for years, eventually learning that libraries and other purchasers were informed the book was
out of print. Facing stonewalling from the publisher, Quigley hired a lawyer who discovered the
plates for the book had been destroyed 8 years earlier and he had been deceived all that time.
We don't need an imagination to know what happened. Quigley's book contained information
relating to the Satanist ICG that they didn't want in the public realm, the publisher obviously
being threatened to perform as required.

96
 David Irving

David Irving is a famous historian, respected worldwide, with many great books published, but
he also revealed dark truths about both the US and the Jews, and had his life similarly
destroyed. They sued him and bankrupted him, causing him to lose his beautiful home in
England, and to be deported in shame. Irving is no longer permitted to enter most Western
countries. His life is finished, for the same reason as all the others - for daring to tell the
truth of the crimes and atrocities of the US, the International Jews and the ICG.

In all Western countries, there are many such stories of people whose lives have been ruined
or who have been killed, simply for exposing some dark truths about these people. Again, not
only censorship, but gangsterism on a grand scale.

There are other serious matters: The truths of Jewish atrocities in Palestine are
censored, meaning the mass media will not cover them and anyone else attempting
to do so will be condemned and vilified as an anti-Semitic Nazi Jew-hater. In
Germany, any research or writing on the atrocities committed against Germans
during, between, and after both wars, is prohibited and is a criminal offense. Rather
powerful censorship in this case. Further with Germany, being the Jewish colony that country
is today, a recent announcement that any statements critical of Israel might in the future lead
to loss of citizenship. (11) Today it’s about Israel; tomorrow it will be about even a small
hint of ‘anti-Semitism’. If a deprivation of citizenship doesn’t constitute censorship,
I can’t imagine what would. (12)
97
Canada heavily censors - and in fact Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has issued
a gag order on - the fact of hundreds of victims who either suffered or died from the
Jewish/American MK-ULTRA programs conducted in Canada, a censored topic if there
ever was one. (13) (14) (15) Canada also heavily censors the facts of as many as sixty
thousands of small bodies buried outside the walls of Catholic orphanages and Native
Residential Schools. (16) (17) (18) (19)

Indeed, most Western nations have many such unpleasant historical events, almost all
perpetrated by some branch of the ICG, on which even private discussion is essentially
forbidden.

We also tend to think of censorship as applicable to only the current 'Axis of Evil' membership
- which changes over time, giving us a blind and totally unjustified confidence in the chastity
of our Western nations with our 'freedom of speech' and of the press, believing against
voluminous evidence that 'real censorship' does not and could not exist in our democracies.
However, it could, and it does, in far greater bulk than you would imagine even in your dreams.
It is easy to demonstrate that vast amounts of news and information never reach Western
populations. The events in Palestine are one clear example, and with good reason. Iraq and
Libya today are covered with an impermeable news blanket that permits nothing to emerge
from those countries - again with good reason.

Source

Photographs and data of the enormous pollution of nearly the entire Pacific Ocean by the
radiation from Japan's Fukushima reactors are also covered by an impermeable news
98
blanket in spite of considerable evidence of massive seafood deaths and radiation poisoning
along the entire West Coast of North America. It is so bad that millions of fish in Canada's
salmon farms were discovered with huge cysts, multiple open sores and other serious problems,
some of which they blame on bacterial infections but others with apparent common symptoms
of radiation poisoning. (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) The position of Canada's government is: "We
examined this, and there's nothing there. We won't be performing further tests." It
isn't that they don't know, but that they don't want you to know. But no need to worry. Snopes
“fact-checked” this (25) and tells us, “A single salmon found in the Osoyoos Lake in
British Columbia in 2015 had low but detectable levels of radiation.” Nothing more to
see here. They also don't want you to know that the root cause of the astonishing amount of
radioactivity released - far greater than what might emerge from a reactor meltdown -
was that Japan had for decades been storing all its spent radioactive material under Fukushima
for use by the US and NATO in what are euphemistically called "depleted uranium"
munitions. It was contamination from this immense storage that blew out into the Pacific and
that cannot now be contained.

This is one more news item that was viciously censored. Source

And, as people in Iraq and Libya can testify, these radioactive elements are not quite so
'depleted' as advertised, Iraq alone having countless thousands of deformed births, many so
horribly mis-shapen they were described by UN health officials as "unidentifiable lumps of
flesh". (26) (27) (28) This is one more news item that was viciously censored. Another was
that an Iraqi hospital was cataloguing and recording all these horrid deformities, the US
"censorship" response in this case being to launch a series of airstrikes in which they
bombed the entire hospital to rubble, not only destroying the deformed infants and
eliminating all the recorded evidence, but killing those who were cataloguing it. (29)
(30) (31) You can understand why this was also censored.

The simple truth is that you, sitting on your democratic thrones, being massaged by all your
freedoms and perfumed by all your human rights, have no way of knowing what you don't
know. And there is a great deal that you do not know.

99
 Let's Burn all the History Books

The censorship by our Satanist ICG is far more insidious than the above examples suggest,
examples which, in spite of their alarming content, are merely the cleaning-up of details. The
major tragedies perpetrated by these people are not the suppression of information or even
the deletion of elements of history, but in their purest form involve the destruction of
national cultures and of peoples. I will explain.

The Americans’ first major attempt at colonisation was with their invasion of the Philippines,
after which they forced their language onto that nation and immediately followed with a
carefully-chosen selection of false American history, literature and propaganda. They spent
decades and countless millions of hours in determining the best way to propagandise an entire
nation of people to forget their own past, venerate their present colonial status, and learn to
worship the Americans. The Americans, led by the ICG, then destroyed and rewrote all
Philippine domestic history books to erase from consciousness that nation’s heroes, traditions,
culture, and hopes of freedom from American imperialism. They tried to colonise the souls of
the Philippine people, and failed, leaving the country today with almost no culture or traditions,
no domestic products (which are a crucial part of a nation’s culture), and having lost all sense
of a civilisation. It is painful to read American commentary on the Philippines today, virtually
classifying that nation as a failed state, identifying the lack of progress and apparent absence
of social cohesion, and blaming the nation’s culture for these failings. (32)

The British and the Opium Jews did to the Chinese in Hong Kong precisely as the Americans
did to the Philippines: they attempted to colonise the souls of the people, and failed. The major
factor underlying many of Hong Kong’s problems and symptoms today, most especially the
social and political elements, was this century-long program of cultural genocide that left in its
wake a schizophrenic emotional angst, which the US government is today milking for everything
it’s worth. (33)
100
The British ICG followed the American path, first forcing the change in national language, then
doing their best to force the population of Hong Kong to forget their own past, venerate their
colonial status, and learn to worship the British Empire. Few people, and no young people, in
Hong Kong today have any knowledge of this part of their history because the British and the
Opium Jews did what the Americans did - they burnt all the history books and re-wrote Hong
Kong’s history in an attempt to erase their own sordid past from the consciousness of Hong
Kong’s people. Almost nobody in Hong Kong today knows of its 150 years as the largest drug
dealer in history, nor that most fortunes in Hong Kong emanate from opium – like the
Kadoorie family's beautiful Peninsula Hotel with its famous green Rolls-Royces.

It is heart-breaking to look at Hong Kong today, to see both the cause and effects, and the
existentialist dread that infects that city, the uncertainty, anxiety and fear manifesting itself in
American-incited and financed puerile political demonstrations, racism and even hatred of the
Mainland Chinese – hatred of their own people, of themselves – the schizophrenic overflow
from a century of mostly-failed psychic re-programming.

Even worse, the real tragedy is that the Americans and the Satanists have no culture.
They attempted to forcibly replace a real cultural heritage of a real civilisation with a fictional
utopian concoction that was entirely fake, superficial and hypocritical, with so-called ‘values’
that the Americans and ICG Satanists themselves totally ignore in practice.

The British (and again the Satanist Opium Jews – Rothschild, Sassoon, et al) did the same with
India, which is why we have the schizophrenic mess in that country today, Indians not now
knowing if they are West or East. Rothschild, with his British East India Company and his
already enormous wealth, found India an immensely rich country and looted it to the bones. It
is claimed that at one time the man had a standing army of nearly one million men, the world’s
largest. Half of that force was to suppress with massive slaughters and starvation any Indians
objecting to the looting of their nation, the death tolls by some estimates being well over 100
million. The other half was to force Indian farmers to forego food crops and grow opium
poppies, a scheme he hatched with David Sassoon.

Sassoon had been the primary financial advisor and treasurer to the Pasha of Baghdad when
an enormous fraud was uncovered and Sassoon lucky to escape with his life (and his looted
billions). Jewish publications tell us Sassoon fled Baghdad due to "anti-Jewish sentiment", not
specifying that sentiment applied primarily to only one Jew. Sassoon fled to India to join
Rothschild, where these two Satanists hatched the plan to grow opium and inflict it
on China – which was also wealthy at the time. They were blessed by Royal contacts, with
Queen Victoria – one of the most zealous (and talented) gangsters and murderous imperialists
of all time – giving not only her consent to the opium and the use of the British military to
enforce its distribution and use in China, but also sharing in the profits from both India and
China. From this original intercourse with the Devil's spawn, the wealth of the British Royal
Family (“The Firm”) soared, and is today rather more than the published accounts
suggest, by as much as two orders of magnitude.

101
Almost all of this history has been deleted from India, the British and the Satanist ICG rewriting
India’s history books so Indians today believe the Jews and the British were there simply to
teach them “English, good table manners and double-entry bookkeeping”. It is not a surprise
that the Head Office of the former British East India company is sealed and locked on a quiet
street with examination of records prohibited and with every effort made to eliminate its
existence from public memory. One of the greatest contributions Wikileaks could make, would
be to publish the entire contents of the internal records of that god-forsaken organisation.

Indonesia is almost a special case. First, an excerpt from Harold Pinter's speech when he
accepted his Nobel Prize for literature in 2005: ". . . the Phoenix Program was following prior
CIA experience in the destruction of nations, and became a template the US would use in many
other nations, post-Vietnam, in Nicaragua, Iraq, Libya, most of Central and South America, as
well as Africa and Asia. This is what the Israelis do in Palestine against the Arabs, and was what
the Americans did when they spawned the massive genocidal massacre in Indonesia." Entire
populations of towns and villages were herded to central locations and massacred.
Under the guidance of the CIA, more than three million people were hacked to death
with machetes, in the largest and most savage slaughter in modern political history.

In an earlier article I briefly discussed the enormous massacres committed by the ICG in
Indonesia, stating that around 3 million were killed. One reader, John Chuckman, posted a
comment on that article claiming I lessened the effects of my writing by greatly overstating
facts, that the deaths were only 1 million. But here are the words of respected Indonesian
historian Bonnie Triyana, who wrote, "Ours is an oblivious society. For nearly 50 years
nobody has ever taught us what really happened in 1965. Almost nobody knows that
there were millions killed". The reason is that after taking control of Indonesia through
Suharto, the Americans and their Satanist masters re-wrote the history books, almost deleting
forever the memories of their tragic past as colonial victims.

This is how the story is spun in the West (and in Indonesia) today: According to the NYT, "U.S.
Stood By as Indonesia Killed a Half-Million People, Papers Show". (34) All in all, censorship
at its finest, not only burning the books and rewriting history, but then blaming the
victim - a specialty of our Satanist ICG.

As with the Philippines, this is the ultimate form of censorship - the actual erasing of a
nation's entire history to replace it with a Disney fairytale, all meant to bury for eternity the
vast and intensely evil criminality of our Satanist ICG. (33)

Much of Latin America was similar. After the Europeans and Jewish slave-traders had
exterminated the entire Maya, Inca and Aztec civilisations, they destroyed most of the historical
books and relics and attempted to imprint their own versions of history on these nations.
Another quote from Harold Pinter's Nobel speech: "I refer to Indonesia, Greece, Uruguay,
Brazil, Paraguay, Haiti, Turkey, the Philippines, Guatemala, El Salvador, and, of
course, Chile. The horror the United States inflicted upon Chile in 1973 can never be
purged and can never be forgiven." True, but all these rotten eggs were hatched by the
same members of the murderous ICG, the Americans being merely their stupid
lieutenants.
102
Japan was the same. Few people are aware today, even in Japan, that the Americans
fire-bombed Japanese cities incessantly after an offer to surrender and prior to
dropping the atomic bombs. For an entire year, the Americans waged a fire-bombing
campaign that eventually included nearly 100 Japanese cities, devastating Japan’s fragile wood-
and-paper-constructed communities. This campaign killed exponentially more civilians
than we are told about for Hiroshima and Nagasaki. (35) This is the same Curtis LeMay
who would boast only a few years later that he had carpet-bombed and killed as much
as 40% of the civilian population of North Korea – for no reason whatever.

In the most celebrated case, “Operation Meetinghouse”, US bombers conducted a night

raid on Tokyo that destroyed 50 square Kms of the city. The downtown Tokyo suburb of
Shitamachi had been targeted as the center of this raid because the area contained the highest
civilian population density of any city in the world at the time, with some 750,000 people living
in the easily-flammable wood-frame buildings in that district. Just after midnight, 334
massive B-29 Superfortress bombers flying at an altitude of only 150 meters, carried
out an intense three-hour raid that dropped a half-million M-69 incendiary bombs.
These incendiary devices, as with Dresden, created an immense firestorm fanned by
winds of 50 Kms per hour that totally razed the Shitamachi district and spread flames
throughout the remainder of the city, incinerating at least 750,000 people and quite
possibly more than 1 million - regardless of what the NYT tells you.

The bombers carried incendiary explosives that included napalm infused with white
phosphorus, perhaps the most vicious and immoral of all weapons ever used on civilian
populations, this contribution to humanity having been created and developed by Harvard
University. The incendiaries produced firestorms similar to those in Hamburg, Germany, two
years prior, and in Dresden only a month earlier. Temperatures on the ground in Tokyo
reached 1,800 degrees in some places. Survivors’ accounts tell of women running through
the streets with burning babies strapped to their backs, of people leaping into swimming
pools to try to escape the flames only to be boiled alive. In his book, “War Without
Mercy”, John Dower wrote “Canals boiled, metal melted and buildings and human
beings burst spontaneously into flames”. About 65% of Tokyo’s commercial area, and
about 20% of its industry, was destroyed. Almost 300,000 buildings burned to the ground in
Tokyo alone. This was the single deadliest air raid of the Second World War. Few
escaped the inferno, and fewer today even know it happened. (36) (37)

There were widespread documented reports of such great blood-red mists and an overwhelming
stench of burning human flesh rising into the air and filling the cockpits of the low-flying
American bombers, that the crews were forced to don their oxygen masks to keep them from
vomiting. Such was the human carnage. This was genocide by any measure, and yet
the entire sordid mess has been excised from all US history books, and most Japanese
know nothing of it.

103
Similarly, LeMay's fire-bombing of other Japanese cities produced a population
reduction of about 50%, reflecting at least 10 million civilian deaths - all women, children
and the elderly because able-bodied men had already been conscripted into the war effort. The
Americans were desperate to obliterate evidence of their crimes and, since they totally
controlled the post-war media in Japan (as in Germany), they eliminated public access to
information and as with Germany, the Philippines, Indonesia, and other nations, they destroyed
and re-wrote the history books to make the public ignorance permanent.

There is another matter dealing with Japan, that of the selection of targets for the atomic
bombs. The man making the choices was a Jew - Bernard Baruch, billed even by his own
admission as perhaps "the most powerful man in America" at that time. Baruch's first choice
was Kyoto because that was, like Dresden for Germany, the cultural heart of Japan and its
utter destruction by an atomic bomb would "open a wound that would never heal." Kyoto
was protected by Providence with a solid overcast that prevented the bombers from locating it
with sufficient precision so they proceeded to their alternate of Hiroshima. If Baruch had the
power to choose the first target, we can assume he was also in position to select the second
target of Nagasaki.

I noted in an earlier article that Nagasaki had expelled all the Jews from that city prior
to the second war, and that Japan expelled all Jews from the country a few years later. Being
a Jew, Baruch would have been vividly aware of all this, and logic compels us to ask what
part these expulsions played in Baruch’s decisions to target Japan and Nagasaki for the atomic
bombs.

Naturally, this information has evaporated from the historical record, the world no longer aware
that the US, their Satanist ICG masters and the International Jews are not only some of the
world's greatest censors, book-burners and historical revisionists of all time, but also some
of the world’s greatest mass murderers. On this latter point, the Jewish columnist Sever
Plocker wrote an article titled “Stalin’s Jews”, published in the Israeli Ynet News, in which he
stated: “We must not forget that some of greatest [mass] murderers of modern times
were Jewish.” (38) (39) He may be correct, but then this is what censorship is really about.

104
 Notes

(1) http://www2.hawaii.edu/~tbrislin/David_Godzilla.htm
(2) https://www.jamesbacque.com/
(3) https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/01/20/eisenhowers-death-camps/
(4) https://nationalvanguard.org/2017/06/eisenhowers-death-camps/
(5) https://rielpolitik.com/2019/07/07/hidden-history-eisenhowers-death-camps-the-last-dirty-secret-of-
ww2/
(6) https://archive.org/details/EisenhowersRhineMeadowsDeathCampsADeliberatePolicyOfExtermination
(7) https://nowtoronto.com/news/ernst-zundel-life-on-the-altar-of-hate/
(8) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/tony-hall-suspended-lethbridge-1.3793294
(9) https://uleth.academia.edu/AnthonyJHall
(10) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/university-lethbridge-anthony-hall-retire-1.4778277
(11) https://www.rt.com/news/525936-germany-citizenship-ban-anti-semites/
(12) https://www.unz.com/ghood/the-washington-post-treat-america-like-a-conquered-nation/
(13) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canadian-government-gag-order-mk-ultra-1.4448933
(14) https://hekint.org/2019/04/30/the-montreal-experiments-brainwashing-and-the-ethics-of-
psychiatric-experimentation/
(15) http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1193936/pg1
(16) https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/remains-215-children-found-former-indigenous-school-
site-canada-2021-05-28/
(17) https://cathnews.co.nz/2021/06/10/pompous-posturing-bishop-accuses-trudeau-of-deflecting-blame-
on-residential-schools/
(18) https://cpa.org.au/guardian/issue-1965/grave-containing-215-indigenous-children-evidence-of-
canadian-residential-school-genocide/

105
(19) https://meaww.com/4100-indigenous-students-died-attending-canadian-kamloops-indian-
residential-school-abuse-racism
(20) https://thenarwhal.ca/disturbing-new-footage-shows-diseased-deformed-salmon-b-c-fish-farms
(21) https://cottagelife.com/outdoors/disturbing-video-appears-to-show-disfigured-farmed-salmon-in-
british-columbia/
(22) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/west-coast-fish-to-be-tested-for-fukushima-
radiation-1.1011789
(23) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/fish-farm-atlantic-salmon-seafood-watch-1.3437610
(24) https://www.healwithfood.org/safety-concerns/pacific-salmon-radioactive-or-safe-to-eat.php
(25) https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/radioactive-salmon-fukushima/
(26) https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2013/3/15/iraq-wars-legacy-of-cancer
(27) https://countercurrents.org/2020/12/cancer-birth-defect-iraq-to-sue-u-s-over-sovereignty-violation-
and-use-of-depleted-uranium-weapons/
(28) http://www.holywar.org/txt/027.htm
(29) https://archive.thinkprogress.org/this-isnt-the-first-time-the-u-s-has-bombed-a-hospital-
ac694e21761c/
(30) https://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/12/09/us-military-admits-we-deliberately-bombed-
hospital-iraq
(31) https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20161208-iraq-us-bombs-mosul-hospital/
(32) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/09/changing-cultural-values-september-19.html
(33) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/04/the-history-of-hong-kong-britains.html
(34) https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/18/world/asia/indonesia-cables-communist-massacres.html
(35) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/04/japan-ending-war-and-saving-lives-by.html
(36 https://www.enotes.com/topics/war-without-mercy
(37) https://www.amazon.com/War-Without-Mercy-Power-Pacific/dp/0394751728
(38) https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/08/the-greatest-mass-murderers-of-all-time-were-jews-says-
jewish-columnist/
(39)https://www.freedomofspeechtwentyfirstcentury.com/2019/09/the-greatest-mass-murderers-of-all-
time.html

106
In our world today, who desperately needs to be "fact-checked"? The mass media, of
course. And, in today's world, who owns, funds, and controls the entire fact-checking
infrastructure and conducts all the fact-checks? The mass media, of course. So, the
inmates are running the asylum and the foxes are guarding the henhouse. What could possibly
go wrong?

First, let's disabuse ourselves of the foolish notion that the fact-checking performed today
actually involves any checking of facts. It does not. The primary purpose of this industry is
not a search for truth but is instead an insidious form of censorship, one final way of tightening
the string around the sack of information to prevent the escape of inconvenient truths
and, if they do escape, to club them to death at birth. A powerful secondary purpose of fact-
checking is to bury knowledge of the crimes and atrocities committed by our
International Cabal of Gangsters (ICG) and to protect them from public censure. The
only requirement for success is a gullible and uninformed public.

One of the more tragic results of media concentration, propaganda and censorship is that fact-
checking has been almost totally co-opted by the propagandists. At a time when we desperately
need honest fact-checking of media claims, the media outlets themselves like Gannet
Publishing, Reuters, ABC news, have moved into the forefront of this market, effectively
checking themselves and, unsurprisingly, conclude they didn't lie to us. Worse, the media
fact-checking departments also function as intelligence agencies, proclaiming their
chastity while attempting to ferret out and silence the ultimate sources of contrary opinion and
truth. One example from my personal experience:
107
Several of my early articles on COVID-19 went viral with reader downloads in the millions,
instantly attracting the attention of the ICG. Following this, and coincident with numerous hit
pieces in the mainstream media, I received an email from a gentleman at Gannett Publishing,
presenting himself as "a fact-checker for USA Today", ostensibly wanting to determine the
veracity of some of my statements. It should be obvious that 'fact-checking' would produce a
request such as "You made this claim. Please can you provide documented evidence of its
accuracy?" Not with Gannett, it didn't.

The request displayed no interest in obtaining evidence of my claims, but a demand to know
my sources. The issue was that I seemed to know many things I should not know, and they
couldn't figure out where I was getting my information. The man was of course "reaching out"
to me, but what he was reaching for was my information sources. He didn't want more
supporting evidence for my claims, but to know where I had obtained the evidence I'd already
presented, specifically "from where did you collect the research in your articles?" He also
wanted a list of the names of other "writers, officials or commentators" who knew what I knew
and who shared my views. This is not fact-checking, but intelligence-gathering for the
purpose of identifying and silencing sources of dissention.

The fact-checking industry was not created to fact-check the false claims and media support
for the invasions of Iraq and Libya or today's imaginary "genocide" in China's Xinjiang, but
instead to silence those attempting to reveal the truth. It was never meant to examine
the process of vaccinations (of any kind) but to silence those either expressing fears of
dangerous vaccines or exposing contaminations in those vaccines.

In this latter case, the vaccine makers (or their paid promoters) are the primary source of the
'facts' distributed by the media and used by the fact-checkers to ridicule and attempt to
invalidate genuine public concerns. All three parties steadfastly ignore the hard fact that
the US government has paid billions in compensation for injuries and deaths from
dangerous and contaminated vaccines. (1) And nowhere do they mention that nearly 100
million Americans were infected with a potentially cancerous simian virus from a contaminated
polio vaccine. (2) Nor do they mention the CDC report that infants receiving a full slate of
childhood vaccines could potentially be exposed to more than 300 contaminants. You can see
the problem: much of the truth and underlying evidence, though available, is being buried by
the media in their support of the ICG, while the 'leakage' is dealt with by other means.

There is nothing here about checking facts. It is all about the control of information, half
of which involves the identification and silencing of opposing views. It is in this light
that all fact-checking must be seen.

I recently wrote a heavily-documented article on the thesis (now widely-accepted, I believe)

that the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic was not influenza but was instead a now-proven
bacterial infection, the tragic result of a misguided experiment by the Rockefeller
Medical Institute of a meningitis vaccine that began at Fort Riley in the US and spread
around the world not by the soldiers but by Rockefeller itself. (3) Reuters immediately
conducted a 'fact-check' of the thesis and pronounced it false. Reuter's evidence? Non-existent,
the claim sufficing as irrefutable proof. (4) Moreover, some of Reuters' claims were completely
108
false. The intent was to bury a politically-dangerous truth and prevent its escape into the public
realm.

In another case, when public concern was rapidly accelerating about the escaping radiation
from Japan's Fukushima reactor, the media almost immediately buried the story and replaced
it with a flurry of articles about one single salmon in Canada's Osoyoos Lake discovered with
measurable but insignificant levels of Cesium radiation. The lake is hundreds of miles inland
and irrelevant to the radiation in the Pacific Ocean, but suddenly this was the only story.
Following on this, Snopes obediently 'fact-checked' the Fukushima Pacific radiation and used
this story of the single unrelated salmon to pronounce the prior Fukushima radiation stories
false. (5) Again, this is not about checking facts but about burying the truth.

This is almost an aside but, with Osoyoos Lake containing potentially millions of salmon, what
are the odds that only one salmon would be contaminated and that my net would find it? But
in fact, the story originated on the social media and I could find no reliable evidence of the
existence of this one radioactive fish. The few people reporting it were all referencing each
other or Snopes, which almost certainly means a contrived and fabricated tale was used
to mislead the public about the very real dangers of Fukushima. Well-done, I thought.

Another clever ploy is to take an inflammatory and inaccurate headline from a tabloid news
source, attribute it to the person in question, then ‘fact-check’ the statement, pronounce it
false, and use that to defame the author who never said any such thing. The fact-checkers
not only want to bury the truth, but to bury those who reveal it. Another example from
my personal experience: My heavily-documented article about the WHO vaccination program
that sterilised about 150 million women without their knowledge or consent (6), was obtaining
considerable attention worldwide, most notably of the ICG, who called in the fact-checkers, in
this case the Poynter Institute. I will deal with them in more detail in a moment. Poynter created
a web page just for me, and this is what they wrote:

"FALSE: Larry Romanoff’s statements claiming WHO has taken part in creating various viruses
in the laboratories. The organization has spread the new coronavirus in the world, so that the
pharmaceutical companies can make money by developing vaccines, which, for its part, will
reduce the world population." (7)

The "false" part is that I have never written any such things. I have never claimed the
WHO 'created viruses', nor have I ever mentioned the WHO in any context related to COVID-
19. Their statement, slanderous as it is, is false in its entirety. But the amazing part is to follow.
Poynter didn't stop there. They found a news article on a Georgian news website that made
brief reference to my writing, but that contained no reference to the WHO or any of the other
claims above. They then copied this website page - and amended it - posting the copied and
amended version on one of their own websites, providing the link to their fraudulent version -
presented as the original - as 'proof' of my having made false claims.

109
First, this is the link to the original news page (8). It is in Georgian script, so you won't be able
to read it and most translators cannot handle Georgian, meaning no one will know what the
page actually says. The website is ge.news-front/info. Next, this is the link to Poynter's false
web page (9). You can access it by clicking on the button: READ THE FULL ARTICLE
(FACTCHECK GEORGIA) on the Poynter website above (7). This website, controlled by Poynter,
is https://factcheck.ge/ka. This is also in Georgian script, so you won't be able to read it either.

If this isn't clear, Poynter attempted to confuse readers by conflating my article about the WHO
'anti-fertility' vaccination programs with my other (unrelated) articles on COVID-19, then
fabricated a claim that I had accused the WHO of creating the COVID-19 virus to profit the
pharma companies while sterilising the world. Lacking evidence of this, they copied a web page
that was in a language almost no one can read and almost no translators can handle, amended
the page and posted it on their own website, presenting it as the original, and purporting to
contain 'proof' of my 'false' claims against the WHO. In America, this is known as "fact-
checking".

110
 The Fact-Checking Industry

The fact-checking industry began with a disguised innocence and good intentions, with websites
like Snopes initially spending their time debunking urban legends and refuting claims of Elvis
being seen at the mall. But in fact, these creations were hiding in the bushes waiting for the
right time to attack.

Fact-checking today is a huge worldwide industry conceived and created decades ago as a
powerful censorship tool, controlled by a closely-knit incestuous group and heavily funded with
countless millions of dollars primarily by George Soros, the Gates Foundation, various media
companies, and similar. This industry was not created to fact-check the false claims and media
support for ICG crimes, but instead to silence those attempting to reveal the truth.

The so-called Poynter Institute, whom you met above, is at the forefront of this industry
today, with funding from the above sources. Poynter created and controls the so-called non-
partisan International Fact-checking Network (IFCN) "that sets standards for fact checkers",
virtually forcing all players into this 'network' or into oblivion as we have seen happen to
Internet browsers and search engines. Through these machinations, Poynter has certified itself
as the policeman for the news feeds of the world. It isn't widely known, but Facebook and
others do not actually perform any checking of their own, but instead use this source to
automatically police their content.

Poynter are even more dangerous than the above would suggest, because they have created
for themselves a position as "the journalism institute responsible for training writers and
reporters", countless thousands of young people passing through this 'institution' very possibly
forever corrupted by their training. And Poynter's attempts in furthering the total media control
of the ICG are not imaginary:

111
Poynter recently published a list of 515 news websites they deemed "unreliable" (10), a list
compiled from "fake news" databases curated primarily by the Annenberg Public Policy Center
at University of Southern California, Merrimack University, PolitiFact and Snopes. They not only
damned these websites as providing misinformation, but their original article asked
advertisers to blacklist all sites on their list. The later version according to Poynter
executive Barrett Golding: "Fake news is a business. Much of that business is ad-
supported. Aside from journalists, researchers and news consumers, we hope that the index
will be useful for advertisers that want to stop funding misinformation."

They overplayed their hand. The backlash to this was so extreme that Poynter had to retract
the list and make a public apology, excusing themselves on "weaknesses in the
methodology". It wasn't embarrassment for an ethical failure but multiple threats of serious
lawsuits that caused the retraction. However, Poynter managing editor Barbara Allen wrote
"We regret that we failed to ensure that the data was rigorous before publication, and apologize
for the confusion and agitation caused by its publication". But then (to give readers a laugh),
she stated, "We pledge to continue to hold ourselves to the highest standards." One individual
posted on Twitter: "Junkyard Attack Dogs Pose as Watchdogs". Correct in all respects.

To my best knowledge, there are no fact-checkers that are not part of this worldwide network.
Some are sponsored and operated by the media departments of various universities, but those
departments have received funding from these same sources and therefore are subject to, and
under the control of, the same people.

These "same people" are those who already own and/or control the entire mass media
landscape, including newspapers, magazines, all TV and most radio networks, the book
publishers, the book distributors like Amazon and Indigo, the Hollywood studios who control
virtually all movies and most TV programs. They also have the same stranglehold on the social
media landscape, as well as related entities like Google and Wikipedia.

As I have noted in other articles in this series, it is vital to understand that it is not Poynter, or
Reuters, or Gannett who control the fact-checking industry. These statements evade the
essential point that it is individuals, real people with names, who exercise this control, and who
are working in concert with all other media individuals as lieutenants of the ICG, all sharing the
same 'values' and all following the same 'agenda'. A major part of this agenda is total
information control, the fact-check portion being merely a kind of janitorial detail to sweep up
and eliminate the bits of truth that succeed in escaping this information control net. And this
net is nearly complete; information control and censorship in the US is alarmingly
nearing a 100% level, yet few seem to have noticed. The same is true of Canada, the
UK, Germany, Japan, Australia, and increasing in other Western nations.

Once again, the mass media lie to us in whole or in part about almost everything of real
consequence in the world today, reading from the same script as the ICG and furthering
their agenda. Wikipedia, with its massive promotion by Google, is a major misinformation site
that has almost a stranglehold on popular information, but is heavily biased and edited by these
same people, and is untrustworthy on most topics of consequence. Google is astonishingly
selective on information it permits to reach the public. Facebook and Twitter take
112
their marching orders from the same source and will exercise a near-total embargo
on any personal communications or posts that contradict the official narrative
approved by the ICG. With COVID-19, yesterday, lab sources were embargoed, these social
media almost vicious in their censorship of contradictory material. Today, natural sources of
the virus are embargoed, Facebook and Twitter performing an instant 180-degree turn and
today banning - as "misinformation" - the opposite of what they banned yesterday.

The book-publishers determine the content of all bound material that reaches the public, most
especially educational materials from kindergarten to university level. If content does not fit
the 'agenda', the book will almost certainly never see the light of day and, if it is lucky enough
to escape the net, Amazon and Indigo will be "out of stock" or will simply delist the books. The
entire fact-checking industry is marching to precisely the same tune, played by the same
orchestra. This is already so true that whenever any major media outlet claims that something
has been fact-checked, delete this information from your consciousness because it is almost
certainly false.

I am repeating myself, but it is vital to understand that all this emanates from the same
single source, a group of a few hundred people centered mostly in Europe, who are
extraordinarily wealthy and who determine and set the agenda - again, real people with
names. The determination to control all of the world’s information, either by distribution or by
censorship, originates here. It is crucially important that you connect all these dots to
the same central source.

113
Notes

(1) https://prepareforchange.net/2019/05/28/gates-foundation-funded-fact-checker-politifact-censors-
greenmedinfo
(2) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10472327/
(3) The 1918 Rockefeller-US Army Worldwide Pandemic
http://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1319/
(4) https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-vaccines-caused-1918-influe-idUSKBN21J6X2
(5) https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/radioactive-salmon-fukushima/
(6) https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/05/a-cautionary-tale-about-who.html
(7) https://www.poynter.org/?ifcn_misinformation=larry-romanoffs-statements-claiming-who-has-taken-
part-in-creating-various-viruses-in-the-laboratories-the-organization-has-spread-the-new-coronavirus-in-
the-world-so-that-the-pharmaceutica
(8) https://ge.news-front.info/2020/03/18/koronavirusi-chinethshi-ar-tsarmoishva-gamarjoba-lugaris-
laboratoriav/?fbclid=IwAR1k_m_yLV_s78yjPSI6UsEm_hl0RO7U_cnGzoH2S3fFpRdVeP_6N3rFxeQ
(9) https://factcheck.ge/ka/story/38702
(10) https://thehill.com/homenews/media/441959-poynter-pulls-blacklist-of-unreliable-news-websites-
after-backlash

114
We are all aware of the ability of the Anglo-Zionist International Cabal of Gangsters (ICG) to
propagate the preferred story-line for every occasion, as with the Russia/Ukraine conflict today.
Generally, they employ the power of the Western media to overwhelm the world’s publics with
the accepted version of events. But how do the US and Israel, and the ICG, manage so well to
avoid the negative publicity from their own foreign policy adventures? Most of us would
instinctively believe we have the easy answer to this question, since it appears to hinge simply
on media censorship, but we might be mistaken. There is more to a successful information
blockade than is superficially obvious.

The first part of course is the nearly-universal control of all Western media by a relatively small
handful of people, all Jews. This includes first the news services like AP and Reuters, then the
newspapers plus most recognised magazines, radio and TV stations and networks, virtually the
entire book publishing industry, all of the social media and related internet platforms like
Wikipedia and Google, “fact-checkers” like the despicable Poynter Institute, as well as 90% of
Hollywood which includes both motion pictures and television programs. Their control on
information is nearly total.

But control goes far beyond ownership. As one example, The Globe & Mail is (was) a respectable
broadsheet long recognised as Canada’s national newspaper. Some years ago, the Globe
published an article detailing the atrocities then being committed against Arabs by the Jews in
Palestine. The article wasn’t inflammatory or ideological, but simply an accurate chronicle of
events the editors believed should be brought to the attention of the world. The very next
115
morning, the entire top half of the front page of the Globe carried a huge photo of a Jewish
soldier giving candy to a supposedly Palestinian child, with text to match. You don’t need an
imagination to know what happened behind a closed door somewhere. The date was 1983 and,
in the 39 years since then, the Globe hasn’t published a single article that was critical of either
the Jews or of Israel. That's control. I have covered this part and more in an article on
Propaganda and the Media - Establishing and Controlling the Narrative. You may care to read
it. (1)

However, the first thing we do is to ensure that all media of consequence are reading from the
same script and know what is mandatory to report, and what is forbidden. But this is largely
the Western media, with little Jewish control outside this 'democratic' cocoon. What to do about
the remainder of the world's media, especially the "Axis of Evil" and similar, who are
notoriously disobedient but whose publications are generally available to those in the West?
How to avoid contaminating our children with leaky truth?

As one example, Al Jazeera is (was) a Qatari government-funded Arabic-language news channel

based in Doha, with an international readership and an irritating tendency to reveal
inconvenient truths about Western foreign diplomatic and military adventures. It was for years
denounced in the West as an heretical and deplorable affront to the "official narrative"
propagated by the West. Poor little Al Jazeera should have been cowering in fear from the
Western character assassinations, but somehow it wasn't. Then, suddenly, a climate change.
Al Jazeera became mainstream, no longer blocked or censored, but actually recommended as
a reliable news source, praised even by Hillary Clinton herself. What happened? The US made
the Qatar government an offer it couldn't refuse, and control was sold to the CIA. Today, Al
Jazeera is even worse (or better, depending on your point of view) than CNN or Fox News or
the UK Guardian. Often, one cannot tell the difference. Here is the link to Al Jazeera's main
page: click on it and see for yourself.

https://www.aljazeera.com/

But this sale was the end of the trail, not the beginning. America's responses are invariably
"Kill first, then negotiate." Not letting us down, Bush's first action was to bomb the bejeesus
out of Al Jazeera's foreign stations, first those in Afghanistan, then in Iraq. To assist in the
justification, the Americans cited the usual "intelligence reports" that some Al Jazeera staff
were ISIS agents, then put cruise missiles into their front doors. (2) With Iraq, it's a shame
that sometimes we contribute to our own demise; the head of Al Jazeera's Kabul office was so
terrified by the events in Afghanistan he made a special trip to the US military headquarters to
give them the GPS coordinates of his location. That was a mistake. The next day, the US military
used the man's own coordinates to put a cruise missile into his front door. (3) They did the
same with the Al Jazeera office in Baghdad, killing all in both locations. After this, Al Jazeera
gave up and pulled out of Iraq. (4) On the same day, another ‘accident’ blew up a Reuters’
vehicle containing several reporters and a ‘stray’ missile destroyed the office of Abu Dhabi
television. (5)

When this still failed to silence brave little Al Jazeera, Bush's next move was to nuke the Head
Office in Doha, fortunately discouraged by Tony Blair. Hence the sale to the CIA. Reading
between the lines, the US offer was, "You have already seen what has happened to your foreign

116
offices. Either turn Al Jazeera over to us, or kiss it good-bye. Qatar had no choice. Hence, Al
Jazeera/CNN.

That more or less took care of the newspapers and TV networks. The Western (Jewish-owned)
ones were already onside and the remainder were now too terrified to report anything not
approved by the Jewish-led ICG.

But there was more. I believe it was Chelsea Manning who released the video of a US gunship
gleefully blasting two Reuters reporters and a dozen other people including two small children,
filming the murders from their Apache helicopter. That video "caused the US government and
military more reputational damage than all the other secret [Wikileaks] documents combined,
and was what made Julian Assange "the foremost global enemy of state secrecy". (6)

But that was only one of dozens. Those reporters, not embedded with the US military but still
mostly from NATO countries, had a sense of immunity not shared by Al Jazeera and, while their
media may have been more or less on the right page, these reporters were nevertheless leaking
uncomfortable amounts of very inconvenient truths - to the tabloids if to no one else. The
silencing process was the same, but targeting reporters one by one was monotonous and
attracted too much public attention. For one, the news of the entire process with Al Jazeera
leaked out, including Bush's intention to nuke their Qatar headquarters. The UK Daily Mirror
published "an explosive story riddled with implications" that attracted a hell of a lot of attention.
So much so, that within 24 hours the Mirror and all British papers had been subjected to a “gag
order” under the Official Secrets Act with threat of prosecution and serious imprisonment. (7)

117
 Group Therapy

A military helicopter flies near the Sheraton (L) and Palestine Hotels on October 25, 2005 in Baghdad,
Iraq. Three suicide car bombs detonated at the Ishtar Sheraton and Palestine Meridian hotel complex. The
attack, on hotels favored by foreign journalists, claimed the lives of at least 15 and injured 20.

That killed the Al Jazeera story, but didn't stop stubborn Western journalists from reporting
many other nasty things. Since single assassinations were proving troublesome, the US military
tried "group therapy", and cleverly done, too. First, they found a 'Timothy McVeigh' to run
a car bomb into the Hamra Hotel that housed among others, NBC News and the Boston Globe.
The attack failed, so they tried again, but with similar results. (8) To improve the odds, they
"relocated" all foreign reporters from the (unsafe) East side of Baghdad to the (safe) West
side, where the only suitable residence location was the Palestine Hotel, with arrangements for
the Hotel to evacuate the 15th floor and put all reporters in one place. Then they hired some
Iraqis to push a truck loaded with explosives next to the hotel, but the heavy barricades
prevented any damage and limited all the deaths to pedestrians on the street. A second
attempt, with enough potential to make Timothy McVeigh envious, also failed; some damage
to the hotel, but all the deaths again on the street.

We all know there are times when, if you want something done right, you just have to do it
yourself. So, the US military rambled a massive Abrams tank down the streets of
Baghdad, positioned itself conveniently to the Hotel, raised its turret barrel and blew
out nearly all of the 15th floor, killing all the reporters present at the time. (9) And
that took care of the mass media reporters. (10) (11) (12) Here are four other reports on the
hotel bombings that killed all the journalists, if you care to read them: (13) (14) (15) (16) The
internet appears to have been completely scrubbed of photos of the aftermath. I searched for
two hours and found nothing.

118
The Palestine Hotel functioned as home and office for more than 100 international journalists
in Baghdad at the time. Forced to conduct an investigation into the matter, the US military
report stated that (a) they had no knowledge that the building was a hotel, (b) after moving
journalists into the hotel, they had no knowledge that journalists had been moved into it, (c)
the building was believed to be an 'enemy firing platform', (d) the Abrams tank had come
under sniper fire and was acting in self-defense, (e) The shelling of the hotel was “not a
deliberate attack” on journalists and the media, but the result of a "breakdown of
communications", and (f) the firing was "clearly a proportionate and justifiable
measured response". To cap the report, Pentagon spokesperson Victoria Clarke said
journalists should know that "Baghdad is not a safe place. You should not be there." (17)

A French TV crew filmed the attack, which put a lie to most of the military's claims including
the fiction of the tank coming under fire, and both the Committee to Protect Journalists and
Reporters without Borders testified that all Pentagon officials as well as all US
commanders in Baghdad knew full well "that the Palestine Hotel was full of
international journalists." Reporters Without Borders testified further that the US military
had killed many dozens of journalists as well as imprisoning a great many more as "cyber
dissidents" who posted information online and in the social media that the US military didn't
like. (18) Not even a whisper of this latter item leaked out.

One of the most powerful executives in the cable news business, CNN's Eason Jordan, was
forced to resign after he "spoke out of school" during a panel discussion at the World
Economic Forum. "In a rare moment of candor", Jordan told the audience US forces had
deliberately targeted and killed dozens of journalists in Iraq - including Al Jazeera. (19) (20)
Keep in mind that the Iraqis were very grateful to the foreign reporters because they were the
only means of getting out the story of the destruction of their country by the Americans. The
Iraqis were protecting foreign reporters, not killing them.

But there was still a problem with independent reporters. One in particular stumbled onto
something he wasn't meant to see. He happened to observe the US military burying large
numbers of body bags in mass graves out in the Iraq desert. At first, he assumed these were
Iraqi bodies being disposed of, but the secrecy intrigued him and he finally learned the bodies
were of Americans - both military servicemen and Blackwater's mercenaries. He said he was
told the US military was reluctant to ship home many hundreds of coffins to the exposure of
the media, even though photographing and reporting on these military coffins was prohibited
as a felony offense. By classifying all those men as 'Missing in Action' (MIA), many family,
media, and financial difficulties would be avoided. Also, recruiting for both the military and
Blackwater's mercenaries would be much eased with smaller death tolls. The reporter knew he
was being monitored, informed his family he feared for his life, and said he needed only a few
days to complete his report and send it off with all the photos. Oddly, it seems the US military
suggested he attend a public function a day later that promised to be of much interest; he did
so, and received a sniper's bullet in the head. The news of the mass American graves in
the Iraq desert has never leaked because all the evidence disappeared.

But still further complications arose. You may (or may not) be aware that the US fired millions
of artillery and other rounds in Iraq that were made of depleted uranium (DU). I won't go into
details here, but one effect of DU is that since then about 25% of all births in Iraq exhibit the
most horrible deformities, babies born with no head, one head, two heads, or three heads. I'm

119
serious. Many infants are born with most of their internal organs outside the torso, and many
with the brain entirely outside the cranial cavity. Many have any number of limbs emanating
from any part of the body, and many with no limbs at all. Some have no eyes; some have only
one large eye in the center of their foreheads, if the nose isn't already there. A UN report
described many emerging fetuses as "unidentifiable lumps of flesh". It was so bad that the
midwives who still at that time delivered most births in Iraq, were refusing to assist at birthing
because "We don't know what will come out."

120
 Unidentifiable lumps of flesh

The US at first denied using DU weapons; when reams of proof destroyed that story,
the US then claimed they posed no danger to humans. The Western media supported this
claim wholeheartedly, with multiple "medical studies" claiming that the radioactive elements
in US munitions were of no danger to humans even in very large doses. Inexplicably, the UN
echoed this. The editorial staff at The Economist magazine tried to mitigate the public impact
by claiming Iraqi babies may have birth defects but they now have freedom and
democracy.

Life Magazine ran an article titled, “The tiny victims of Desert Storm”, detailing how many
American soldiers returned home with the same radioactive contamination and whose wives
experienced similar defective births. The article was touching, and focused on the fact that the
US military adamantly refused to admit that its DU munitions were responsible, and disclaimed
any responsibility for the welfare of these soldiers. But the real point is that Life was somehow
unaware of the hundreds of thousands of similar frightening births in Iraq, focusing only on a
few treasured American lives. The article, and the issue, have since been deleted from Life’s
archive and scrubbed from the internet.

121
 “Information Control”

One hospital in Fallujah was especially conscientious in cataloguing all these horrible
deformities, tending to the live births, preserving the bodies of the dead infants, collecting
volumes of photographs, and meticulously recording all their findings. One result was that not
only news but photos were beginning to leak out. The American response was 100% effective;
they launched a deadly series of air strikes and bombed the entire hospital to rubble, not only
killing the deformed babies but destroying all the accumulated records and evidence, and killing
the medical staff who were cataloguing it. Of course, the attacks killed all the staff and regular
patients in the hospital as well.

When Blowing up Iraqi Hospitals, if at first you don’t succeed . . .

Try again

The BBC ran a story titled, "US strikes raze Falluja hospital", (21) an astonishingly
dispassionate and forgiving piece in which they made the incredible claim that "These are the
kind of preliminary operations which would be carried out before a full-scale assault on Falluja,
122
our correspondent says." That was all the media attention this travesty obtained, except for
Human Rights Watch who explained that "Iraqi government forces have repeatedly struck
Fallujah General Hospital with mortar shells and other munitions. The government has been
firing wildly into Fallujah’s residential neighborhoods . . .,” said Fred Abrahams, special adviser
at Human Rights Watch. “This reckless disregard for civilians is deadly for people caught
between government forces and opposition groups.” (22) Uh huh. Sounds reasonable.

The US did the same in Afghanistan, and for the same reasons. This one was a bit worse
because the hospital administrators, believing this to be a mistake, called the US military
headquarters immediately upon the first strike and repeatedly thereafter, requesting cessation,
but to no avail; the bombing attacks continued. To make matters worse, US gunships were
hovering near the hospital and strafing all those who tried to flee the carnage. None
survived. (23) US General John Campbell said Afghan forces asked for the air strike at
Kunduz hospital, but promised "a full investigation". (24) Campbell blamed "malfunctioning
electronics and human error" for the “targeting mistake” on what crew members thought was
"a Taliban compound" in spite of the huge red cross tattooed on the roof of all hospitals.
The same was true with Libya and Yugoslavia, who also suffered terribly from DU munitions
and with the same inhuman results. In these two cases, no reports leaked about infant
deformities or destroyed hospitals. (25)

There was yet one more small problem requiring attention. You recall the statement above
about the fetuses being "unidentifiable lumps of flesh" and of the photos being leaked. In
downtown Baghdad, there was a major UN headquarters containing a Humanitarian Mission
that had taken interest in these deformed births, and was proven to be the leak (or at least a
major one) of the information and the photos. Conveniently, 'Timothy McVeigh' detonated
a truck full of explosives at the (unfortified) UN headquarters, killing many people
including the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the head of the UN mission
in Iraq. And that was the end of that problem.

As with the hotels, the blame was laid on "Iraqi terrorists", and nobody dared say otherwise,
at least not out loud. There was no claim of responsibility for the explosion. ABC News military
consultant Tony Cordesman said the bombing was part of a "systematic pattern of attacks
mixed with sabotage", and that "it would be difficult to figure out who was responsible for the
attack." (26) There is no smoking gun that can directly tie the explosion to the US military, but
the UN Mission was nearly the only source of aid, medications, food and housing
assistance for the tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens being slaughtered wholesale on
the streets of Baghdad.

Nobody local would have attacked it; it wasn't the UN they hated, but the Americans. In any
case, if the US military would destroy the hospitals and kill all the reporters, they remain the
prime suspects, and only they had something to gain.

123
 Pat Tillman

There was yet another problem, this time from within the US military, in the person of Pat
Tillman, a football star and American hero who naively enlisted to 'serve his country' but then
discovered the war was not what it seemed, and wasn't bashful about telling anyone who would
listen, "This war is so f***ing illegal", and much more. Tillman was killed when his little
battalion encountered merciless gunfire by Iraqi terrorists. His body was shipped home
in celebration, with a post-humous Silver Star, the military comforting the aggrieved family.

But then, an extraordinarily brave young soldier, disobeying direct orders, secretly informed
Tillman's family that Tillman was killed by "friendly fire", causing a huge PR mess. The military
admitted they lied to the family, but the story repeatedly changed. First, Tillman's death
was at the hand of the enemy in battle (from a distance of 100 meters), then by 'friendly
fire' in battle (from a distance of 100 meters), but then it was admitted there had been
no enemy in the vicinity and no battle at all. Explanations as to how 'friendly fire' could
ensue in such a circumstance were all ridiculed. The matter became increasingly incendiary
when more details came to light: (a) Tillman was killed by 3 closely-grouped shots in the
forehead at very close range; (b) almost immediately after his death, Tillman's
uniform, body armor, personal diary and many other personal items were burned, the
military claiming this was merely a matter of 'hygiene'; (c) Messages were leaked
where military lawyers celebrated their ability to derail and prevent investigations
into Tillman's death. (27) (28) (29) (30)

The only other salient fact is that Tillman would soon have returned to the US and had already
arranged a two or three-hour interview with Noam Chomsky where he planned to reveal
everything he had learned about the illegalities of the war, the atrocities committed by the US
military, and other inconvenient truths. The word on the street was that he and Chomsky
planned to team up to conduct a long series of cross-country speeches to inform the American
public about the truth of the war. We cannot absolutely prove that Pat Tillman was executed
by his own military to silence him, though the US military and the CIA have a long-
documented history of this. But the gunshot wounds didn't precisely fit the Military's
description of "mistakenly gunned down by his fellow Rangers", and three closely-grouped
shots to the middle of the forehead at point-blank range wouldn't normally be classified as
"friendly". (31) (32)

124
 Bug Splats and Crispy Critters

One of the despairing aspects of US (and ICG) involvement in recent wars is what appears to
be an abominable contempt for human life. I'm sure all wars have instances of such an attitude,
but with Americans it seems an obscene inhumanity is part of a widely-shared military culture.
As one example, a 'bug splat' is the sound and the result of a large insect like a grasshopper
hitting a car windshield at high speed. But American soldiers in both Afghanistan and Iraq
boasted repeatedly of shooting children in the head with high-powered rifles, literally exploding
the heads of the infants, these being mocked as "bug splats". (33) The famous American sniper
Chris Kyle, who ". . loved killing. I only wish I could have done more of it.", claimed in one
article that his favorite kill was at 1,000 yards, blowing the head off an infant while being held
in its mother's arms. A 'bug splat'. Jewish soldiers in Israel are famous for this also; I have
nearly 100 such photographs, usually of very small children, and all sickening.

Bug Splat

In Iraq, one more thing about DU ammunition that you should know is that when the munitions
explode, they not only vaporise the radioactive elements, but do so at an astonishingly high
temperature and with intense heat sufficient to not only incinerate anyone in proximity but to
literally burn nearby humans 'to a crisp'. In Iraq, these deaths were widely mocked by American
soldiers as "Crispy Critters". Photos were available but the Western media refused to publish
them, and an order had gone out to recover and destroy all copies of these photos. This may
be the only one that survived. Further comment would be pointless, except to note that none
of these atrocities escaped the information blockade.

125
 Crispy Critters

The Western media were all largely onside from the beginning, refusing to publish any
information or photos to detract from America's sanitised 'Bambi' war where nobody suffered.
The non-Western media looked at Al Jazeera and reformed their editorial policies in favor of
survival. Those foreign reporters still alive, had come to their senses and stopped reporting
unpleasant news. The Iraqi institutions also learned their lessons, and the UN was then no
longer offside but happy to claim DU was as healthy as vitamins. The lessons were clearly
understood by all: if you report the wrong things, we will kill you. And, there we are. A
total news embargo which is still in force today and under the same rules.

The final addition to an information blockade is the more recent one of total information control,
consisting of uninhibited censorship, de-platforming, accusations of "fake news" and
"conspiracy theories", hit pieces, and the always-reliable labeling of "anti-Semitic, holocaust-
denying, Nazi Jew-hater". To help this along, we will freeze your bank accounts and
confiscate all your assets.

As a side note, the hypocrisy is so interesting. The West have eliminated access to all Russian
news sources so they "cannot continue to spread lies about Putin's war" but, when Russia cut

126
off Facebook, this was the shameless response from Nick Clegg, Facebook's Head of Global
Affairs: "Soon millions of ordinary Russians will find themselves cut off from reliable
information, deprived of their everyday ways of connecting with family and friends and silenced
from speaking out." (34)

And that is how our Anglo-Zionist International Cabal of Gangsters (ICG) can not only propagate
the preferred story-line for every occasion, but manage so well to avoid the negative publicity
from their own foreign policy adventures as well as Israel's 70 years of atrocities. It has worked
wonders in the recent past for 9/11, for Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen,
Somalia, Venezuela, Ukraine and, if you're the suspicious type, for COVID-19. It has worked
excellently with Cuba for more than 60 years.

Now, the “WHY?”

There is one last item. WHY did our ICG so desperately need a 100% information blackout, a
total news blanket, on Iraq, that they would resort to such drastic measures? It wasn't primarily
to cover up the crimes of their invasion of Iraq, but to prevent the purpose of that invasion
from ever becoming known. In simple terms, Iraq was hijacked. I don't know if 9/11 was part
of the plan or merely presented a golden opportunity, but Iraq has disappeared as a country.
It isn't even a colony. The US makes a show of withdrawing all "combat forces" from Iraq, but
there are more than 50 huge military bases that are permanent; the US never had any intention
of leaving, and cannot leave because the hijacking needs constant military maintenance. One
of the largest 'embassies', i.e., Trojan horses, in the world is the US Embassy in
Beijing with about 1,200 people. The US embassy in Baghdad has more than 16,000
people. It is the Middle East Headquarters for the ICG.

Jewish European bankers and industrialists have taken over virtually all of Iraq, most
importantly the oil. Iraq's new 'constitution' allocates to the ICG a perpetual 65% of Iraq's
oil – at no cost, leaving only 35% for Iraq. Even worse, many of the oil tankers in Iraq are
loaded with the meters turned off; no one knows how much oil is actually shipped nor who
receives the money. Iraq has no control over its own oil.

They have confiscated and now own the central bank, all the media, most businesses of
consequence, the ports and airports, and very much more. And they control the government.
The details are too numerous to list here. Libya is similar or identical in most respects, hence
the 100% news embargo on Libya as well. You may have noticed that absolutely NO news
emanates from either Iraq or Libya, or the remnants of Yugoslavia today. That is not an
accident. This is also what is happening to Venezuela; they want that oil too. In a previous
article titled Humanity at the Crossroads, I covered this part of Iraq in much detail. If you
want to fully understand, you might care to read this Here

The simple truth is that a total news embargo on Iraq was necessary to keep the hijacking out
of public knowledge because if the full truth were to become widely-known, many Western
governments might fall and the Jewish bankers might have severe recovery troubles. Most

127
governments know, but the Western cabal won't talk and the others are simply spouting
Russian or Chinese propaganda. No publics anywhere are aware of this.

Epilogue

This is our Anglo-Zionist ICG, some of the worst mass-murderers of all time,
complemented by people of like psychopathology - Madeleine Albright, Henry Kissinger,
George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Victoria Nuland and so many more, all
heavily abetted by the little Jewish cabal that controls the mass media.

These people are gangsters, the most morally-deformed psychopaths and sociopaths that have
likely ever existed in the history of the world, led by the remnants of Khazaria, the most brutal,
feared, and hated peoples who have ever populated the earth. It was the Russians who
destroyed the Khazar Empire, killed the bulk of these phallic-worshipping Satanists, and
scattered the rest to the four winds. That was hundreds of years ago, and it appears they
will not rest until they destroy Russia in return.

We are dealing with a people who are evil personified, Satanists to the core. It is they who are
most likely responsible for the CIA's killing of more than 150 world leaders and officials, the
Kennedy brothers and more. It is they who have instigated all the wars and "color revolutions",
and who (through the media owned by their friends) have been lionising Russia, China and
Iran for years, desperate to start World War Three after which Satan's new Temple
can be built in Israel and we can properly begin our New World Order as Goyim cattle.
That is the plan. Your belief in it is not material to its execution.

I am almost certain we will soon have that third world war, with Americans once
again stupidly functioning as the 'Bankers' Private Army', believing they are doing
God's work while destroying our world and killing half the population.

Thank you, America, for making the world safe for democracy!

128
 Notes

(1) https://thesaker.is/propaganda-and-the-media-part-3-establishing-and-controlling-the-narrative/
Propaganda and the Media — Part 3 – Establishing and 'Controlling the Narrative
(2) https://theintercept.com/2015/05/08/u-s-government-designated-prominent-al-jazeera-journalist-al-
qaeda-member-put-watch-list/
The U.S. labeled a prominent Al Jazeera journalist a member of Al Qaeda, according to a top-secret
document.
(3) https://www.counterpunch.org/2005/11/23/targeting-al-jazeera/
Targeting Al Jazeera
(4) https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/apr/09/pressandpublishing.Iraqandthemedia
Fury at US as attacks kill three journalists

129
(5) https://www.counterpunch.org/2003/04/07/journalists-die-the-networks-lie-iraqis-ask-quot-why-
quot/
Journalists Die, the Networks Lie, Iraqis Ask "Why?"
(6) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/15/all-lies-how-the-us-military-covered-up-
gunning-down-two-journalists-in-iraq
All lies': how the US military covered up gunning down two journalists in Iraq
(7) https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/apr/09/pressandpublishing.Iraqandthemedia
Fury at US as attacks kill three journalists
(8) https://www.foxnews.com/story/82-die-in-iraq-attacks
82 Die in Iraq Attacks January 13, 2015
(9) https://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/09/sprj.irq.journalists/index.html
Media deaths explanation sought; Wednesday, April 9, 2003
(10) https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4973261&t=1646204056779
Aftermath of the Palestine Hotel Bombing October 25, 2005
(11) https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/apr/09/pressandpublishing.Iraqandthemedia
Fury at US as attacks kill three journalists
(12) https://www.counterpunch.org/2003/04/26/did-the-us-murder-journalists/
Did the US Murder Journalists?
(13) https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/02/04/how-the-murders-of-journalists-in-the-middle-east-are-
brushed-aside/
How the Murders of Journalists in the Middle East Are Brushed Aside
(14) https://rsf.org/en/news/reporters-without-borders-accuses-us-military-deliberately-firing-journalists
Reporters Without Borders accuses US military of deliberately firing at journalists
(15) https://english.alaraby.co.uk/news/reporters-without-borders-accuses-israel-deliberately-targeting-
journalists
Reporters Without Borders accuses Israel of deliberately targeting journalists
(16) https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/8/16/nsa-broke-into-secure-network-of-al-jazeera-and-
others-report
NSA broke into secure network of Al Jazeera and others: report
(17) https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2004/11/iraq-n27.html
Iraq: Reporters Without Borders condemns US report on killing of journalists
(18) http://www.oilempire.us/mediawar.html
US military murder of journalists during invasion of Iraq
(19) https://edition.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/TV/02/11/easonjordan.cnn/
CNN executive resigns after controversial remarks
(20) http://www.oilempire.us/mediawar.html

130
US military murder of journalists during invasion of Iraq
(21) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3988433.stm
US strikes raze Falluja hospital
(22) https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/05/27/iraq-government-attacking-fallujah-hospital
Iraq: Government Attacking Fallujah Hospital
(23) https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-34444053
Afghan conflict: What we know about Kunduz hospital bombing
(24) https://morningmail.org/afghanistan-us-bombs-hospital/
Afghanistan: US bombs hospital
(25) https://theintercept.com/2015/10/07/a-short-history-of-u-s-bombing-of-civilian-facilities/
A SHORT HISTORY OF U.S. BOMBING OF CIVILIAN FACILITIES
(26) https://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=79424&page=1
Blast Rips U.N. Building in Baghdad
(27) https://www.sportscasting.com/evidence-shows-pat-tillman-murdered-according-to-medical-experts/
Evidence Shows Pat Tillman Murdered According to Medical Experts
(28) https://rense.com/general77/assassination.htm
The Assassination Of Pat Tillman
(29) https://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2007/07/was-pat-tillman-murdered/226377/
Was Pat Tillman Murdered?
(30) https://www.liberationnews.org/07-08-07-the-case-pat-tillman-murder-gov-html/
The case of Pat Tillman: murder and government cover-up
(31) https://youtu.be/puavbn0W4dI\
Noam Chomsky remarks on the death of Pat Tillman
(32) http://www.albionmonitor.com/0510a/tillmanchomsky.html
The Meeting That Never Was: Pat Tillman And Noam Chomsky
(33) https://www.monbiot.com/2012/12/17/bug-splats/
‘Bug-Splats’
(34) https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/russia-western-media-blocked-1.6372603
CBC and BBC suspend reporting from inside Russia in face of 'fake' news law, blocking of Western websites

131
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted
on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30
countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a
retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive
positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export
business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting
132
case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in
Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and
the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology
‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).

His full archive can be seen at

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/
He can be contacted at:
[email protected]

133
This e-book may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been
specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made
available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information
purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.

No part of this book, covered by the copyright hereon, may be reproduced or used
in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic or mechanical—without prior
permission of the author, except for excerpts in a review.

Any request for photocopying of any part of this book shall be directed in writing
to Larry Romanoff -- Email: [email protected]

Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2025

134
 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE IN ACTION

民主，最危险的宗教

Democracy – The Most Dangerous Religion

建立在谎言上的国家–第一卷–美国如何变得富有

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — VOLUME 1 — How the US Became Rich — Updated

美国随笔

Essays on America

美国警察国家》第一卷免费电子书

Police State America Volume One

宣传与媒体

PROPAGANDA and THE MEDIA

135
 THE WORLD OF BIOLOGICAL WARFARE

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — VOLUME 2 — Life in a Failed State — Updated

NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — VOLUME 3 — The Branding of America —

Updated

False Flags and Conspiracy Theories

FILLING THE VOID

Police State America Volume Two

BERNAYS AND PROPAGANDA

Kamila Valieva

136
137