Capitulo 5
Capitulo 5
of Overhead and
Underground Lines
The shunt admittance of a line consists of the conductance and the capacitive suscep-
tance. The conductance is usually ignored because it is very small compared to the
capacitive susceptance. The capacitance of a line is the result of the potential differ-
ence between conductors. A charged conductor creates an electric field that emanates
outward from the center of the conductor. Lines of equipotential are created that are
concentric to the charged conductor. This is illustrated in Figure 5.1.
In Figure 5.1, a difference of potential between two points (P1 and P2) is a result
of the electric field of the charged conductor. When the potential difference between
the two points is known, then the capacitance between the two points can be com-
puted. If there are other charged conductors nearby, the potential difference between
the two points will be a function of the distance to the other conductors and the
charge on each conductor. The principle of superposition is used to compute the total
voltage drop between two points and then the resulting capacitance between the
points. Understand that the points can be points in space or the surface of two con-
ductors or the surface of a conductor and ground.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003261094-5 93
94 Distribution System Modeling and Analysis
1 D1 j D RD j D
Vij q1 ln qi ln ij q j ln qN ln Nj (5.1)
2 D1i RDi Dij DNi
1 N Dnj
Vin qn ln , (5.2)
2 n 1 Dni
where
ε = ε0εr = permittivity of the medium,
ε0 = permittivity of free space = 8.85 × 10−12 (F/meter),
εr = relative permittivity of the medium,
qn = charge density on conductor n (C/m),
Dni = distance between conductor n and conductor i (feet),
Dnj = distance between conductor n and conductor j (feet),
Dnn = radius (RDn) of conductor n (feet).
5.2 OVERHEAD LINES
The method of conductors and their images is employed in the calculation of the
shunt capacitance of overhead lines. This is the same concept that was used in
Chapter 4 in the general application of Carson’s equations. Figure 5.3 illustrates the
conductors and their images and will be used to develop a general voltage drop equa-
tion for overhead lines.
In Figure 5.3, it is assumed that
qi qi
qj q j (5.3)
Shunt Admittance of Overhead and Underground Lines 95
1 Sii RDi S D
Vii qi ln qj ln q j ln ij qj ln ij (5.4)
2 RDi Sii Dij Sij
Because of this, the assumptions of Equation 5.3, Equation 5.4 can be simplified to:
1 Sii RDi S D
Vii qi ln qi ln q j ln ij q j ln ij
2 RDi Sii Dij Sij
1 Sii S S S
Vii qi ln qi ln ii q j ln ij q j ln ij
2 RDi RDi Dij Dij
1 Sii S
Vii 2qi ln 2q j ln ij (5.5)
2 RDi Dij
where
Sii = distance from conductor i to its image i′ (feet),
Sij = distance from conductor i to the image of conductor j (feet),
Dij = distance from conductor i to conductor j (feet),
RDi = radius of conductor i in (feet).
Equation 5.5 gives the total voltage drop between conductor i and its image. The
voltage drop between conductor i and ground will be one-half of that given in
Equation 5.5.
1 Sii S
Vig qi ln q j ln ij (5.6)
2 RDi Dij
96 Distribution System Modeling and Analysis
where Pii and Pij are the self and mutual “potential coefficients”.
For overhead lines, the relative permittivity of air is assumed to be 1.0 so that
Using the value of permittivity in μF/mile, the self and mutual potential coeffi-
cients are defined in Equations 5.9 and 5.10.
S
Pˆii 11.17689 ln ii (5.9)
i RD
S
Pˆij 11.17689 ln ij mile/ F (5.10)
Dij
Note: The values of RDi, Sii, Sij, and Dij must all be in the same units. For overhead
lines, the distances between conductors are typically specified in feet while the value
of the conductor diameter from a table will typically be in inches. Care must be taken
to assure that the radius in feet is used in applying the two equations.
For an overhead line of ncond conductors, the “primitive potential coefficient
matrix” P̂primitive can be constructed. The primitive potential coefficient matrix will
be an ncond × ncond matrix. For a four-wire grounded wye line, the primitive coef-
ficient matrix will be of the form
Equation 5.11 shows the partition of the matrix between the third and fourth rows
and columns. In partitioned from Equation 5.11 becomes
Pˆij Pˆin
Pˆprimitve
(5.12)
ˆ Pˆnn
Pnj
Shunt Admittance of Overhead and Underground Lines 97
Because the neutral conductor is grounded, the matrix can be reduced using the
“Kron reduction” method to an n-phase × n-phase phase potential coefficient matrix
[Pabc].
1
Pabc Pˆij Pˆin Pˆnn Pˆ jn (5.13)
The inverse of the potential coefficient matrix will give the n-phase × n -phase
capacitance matrix [Cabc].
1
Cabc Pabc F /mile (5.14)
For a two-phase line, the capacitance matrix of Equation 5.14 will be 2×2. A row
and column of zeros must be inserted for the missing phase. For a single-phase line,
Equation 5.14 will result in a single element. Again, rows and columns of zero must
be inserted for the missing phase. In the case of the single-phase line, the only non-
zero term will be that of the phase in use.
Neglecting the shunt conductance, the phase shunt admittance matrix is given by
where
2 f 376.9911
The diameters of the phase and neutral conductors from the conductor table
(Appendix A) are as follows:
Using the Cartesian coordinated in Example 4.1, the image distance matrix is
given by
Sij di d j
98 Distribution System Modeling and Analysis
where
d j the conjugate of d j
For the configuration, the distances between conductors and images in matrix
form are
The self-primitive potential coefficient for phase a and the mutual primitive
potential coefficient between phases a and b are
58
Pˆaa 11.17689 ln 84.5600mile/ F ,
0.03004
58.0539
Pˆab 11.17689 ln 35.1522mile/ F
2 .5
Using Equations 5.9 and 5.10, the total primitive potential coefficient matrix
is computed to be
Since the fourth conductor (neutral) is grounded, the Kron reduction method is
used to compute the “phase potential coefficient matrix”. Because only one row
and column need to be eliminated, the P̂nn term is a single element so that the
Kron reduction equation for this case can be modified to
Pˆij Pˆij
Pij Pˆij ,
Pˆij
Pˆ Pˆ
Pcb Pˆ32 34 42 19.7957
Pˆ44
S
Pˆii 11.17689 ln ii
RDi
S
Pˆij 11.17689 ln ij mile/ F (5.16)
Dij
where
Sii = distance in ft from a conductor to its image below ground,
Sij = distance in feet from a conductor to the image of an adjacent conductor,
Dij = distance in feet between two overhead conductors,
RDi = radius in feet of conductor i.
100 Distribution System Modeling and Analysis
The last one or two rows and columns of the primitive potential coefficient matrix
are eliminated by using Kron reduction. The resulting voltage equation is
1
q P VLG C VLG (5.19)
The resulting capacitance matrix is partitioned between the third and fourth rows
and columns.
C11 C12
C P
1
(5.20)
C 21 C 22
y11 y12
yabc j C 10 6 S /mile, (5.21)
y21 y22
where
ω = 2 · π · frequency.
Shunt Admittance of Overhead and Underground Lines 101
Example 5.2: Determine the shunt admittance matrix for the parallel
overhead lines of Example 4.2.
The position coordinates for the seven conductors and the distance matrix are
defined in Example 4.4. The diagonal terms of the distance matrix (Example 4.4)
matrix must be the radius in feet of the individual conductors. For this example,
d1 0.721
=
D11 D=
22 D=
23 = = 0.0300 ft.,
24 24
d 2 0.567
D=
44 D=
55 D=
66 = = 0.0236 ft.,
24 24
dn 0.721
D=
77 = = 0.0235 ft
24 24
The distances between conductors and conductor images (image matrix) can
be determined by
Sij di d j
The distance and image matrices are used to compute the 7 × 7 potential coef-
ficient matrix by
Sij
Ppij 11.17689 ln
Dij
102 Distribution System Modeling and Analysis
The primitive potential coefficient matrix is partitioned between the sixth and
seventh rows and columns and the Kron reduction method produces the 6 × 6
potential matrix. This matrix is then inverted and multiplied by ω = 376.9911 to
give the shunt admittance matrix. The final shunt admittance matrix in partitioned
form is as follows:
The concentric neutral strands are grounded so that they are all at the same potential.
Because of the stranding, it is assumed that the electric field created by the charge
on the phase conductor will be confined to the boundary of the concentric neutral
strands. To compute the capacitance between the phase conductor and ground, the
general voltage drop of Equation 5.2 will be applied. Since all the neutral strands
are at the same potential, it is only necessary to determine the potential difference
between the phase conductor p and strand 1.
where
dc
RDc =
2
ds
RDs =
2
It is assumed that each of the neutral strands carries the same charge such that
qp
q1 q2 qi qk (5.23)
k
1 Rb q RDs D D D
Vp1 q p ln p ln ln 12 ln 1i ln 1k
2 RDc k Rb Rb Rb Rb
The numerator of the second ln term in Equation 5.24 needs to be expanded. The
numerator represents the product of the radius and the distances between strand i and
all the other strands. Referring to Figure 5.4, the following relations apply:
2
12 ,
k
4·
13 2·12
k
104 Distribution System Modeling and Analysis
In general, the angle between strand 1 and any other strand i is given by
1i i 1 12
i 1 2 (5.25)
k
The distances between the various strands are given by the following:
D12 2 Rb sin 12 2 Rb sin
2 k
(5.26)
2
D13 2 Rb sin 13 2 Rb sin
2 k
i 1
D1i 2 Rb sin 1i 2 Rb sin (5.27)
2 k
Equation 5.27 can be used to expand the numerator of the second log term of
Equation 5.24.
The term inside the bracket in Equation 5.28 is a trigonometric identity that is
merely equal to the number of strands k[1]. Using that identity, Equation 5.18 becomes
q p Rb 1 k RDs Rbk 1
Vp1 ln ln
2 RDc k Rb k
qp Rb 1 k RDs
Vp1 ln ln (5.29)
2 RDc k Rb
Equation 5.29 gives the voltage drop from the phase conductor to neutral strand 1.
Care must be taken that the units for the various radii are the same. Typically,
Shunt Admittance of Overhead and Underground Lines 105
underground spacings are given in inches, so the radii of the phase conductor (RDc)
and the strand conductor (RDs) should be specified in inches.
Since the neutral strands are all grounded, Equation 5.29 gives the voltage drop
between the phase conductor and ground. Therefore, the capacitance from phase to
ground for a concentric neutral cable is given by
qp 2
C pg F /mile, (5.30)
Vp1 ln Rb 1 ln k RDs
RDc k Rb
where
ε = ε0εr = permittivity of the medium,
ε0 = permittivity of free space = 0.01420 μF/mile,
εr = relative permittivity of the medium.
The electric field of a cable is confined to the insulation material. Various types of
insulation material are used, and each will have a range of values for the relative
permittivity. Table 5.1 gives the range of values of relative permittivity for four com-
mon insulation materials [2].
Cross-linked polyethlyene is a very popular insulation material. If the minimum
value of relative permittivity is assumed (2.3), the equation for the shunt admittance
of the concentric neutral cable is given by
77.3619
yag 0 j S /mile (5.31)
Rb 1 k RDs
ln ln
RDc k Rb
=R 0=
.0511ft. 0.631in
0.567
=
RDc = 0.2835 in
2
0.0641
=
RDs = 0.03205 in
2
106 Distribution System Modeling and Analysis
77.3619
y ab j j 96.6098 S /mile
0.6132 1 13 0.03205
ln ln
0.2835 13 0.6132
The phase admittance for this three-phase underground line is
j 96.6098 0 0
yabc 0 j 96.6098 0
S /mile.
0 0 j 96.6098
77.3619
yag 0 j S /mile. (5.32)
R
ln
RDc
TABLE 5.1
Typical Values of Relative Permittivity (εr)
Material Range of Values of Relative Permittivity
Rb = 0.4375 in.
dc 0.368
=
RDc = = 0.1840 in.
2 2
77.3619 j77.3619 S
y bg j j 89.3
3179
Rb 0.4375 mile
ln ln 0.184
RDc
0 0 0
abc 0
y j 89.3179
0 S /mile
0 0 0
77.3619
yii 0 j S /mile, (5.33)
Rb 1 k RDs
ln ln
RDi k Rb
where
Rb = radius in feet of the circle going through the center of the neutral strands,
RDi = radius in feet of the center phase conductor,
RDs = radius in feet of the neutral strands,
k = number of neutral strands.
108 Distribution System Modeling and Analysis
77.3619
yii 0 j S /mile, (5.34)
R
ln b
RDi
where
Rb = radius in feet of the circle passing through the center of the tape shield,
RDi = radius in feet of the center phase conductor.
77.3619 77.3619
yc 0 j 0 j
R 1 k RDs 0.0511 1 13 0.0027
ln b ln ln ln
RDc k Rb 0.0236 13 0.0511
yc 0 j 96.6098 S /mile
j 96.6098 0 0 0 0 0
0 j 96.6098 0 0 0 0
0 0 j 96.6098 0 0 0
yabc 0 0 0 j 96.6098 0 0
0 0 0 0 j 96.6098 0
0 0 0 0 0 j 96.6098
S/mile.
Shunt Admittance of Overhead and Underground Lines 109
5.6 SUMMARY
Methods for computing the shunt capacitive admittance for overhead and under-
ground lines have been presented in this chapter. Included is the development of
computing the shunt admittance matrix for parallel overhead and underground lines.
Distribution lines are typically so short that the shunt admittance can be ignored.
However, there are cases of long lightly loaded overhead lines where the shunt admit-
tance should be included. Underground cables have a much higher shunt admittance
per mile than overhead lines. Again, there will be cases where the shunt admittance
of an underground cable should be included in the analysis process. When the analy-
sis is being done using a computer, the approach to take is to model the shunt admit-
tance for both overhead and underground lines. There is no need to make a simplifying
assumption when it is not necessary.
PROBLEMS
5.1 Modify the MATLAB scripts M0501.m and M0502.m to import the con-
ductor data in the AppendexA.csv file. Your new script should import the
data parameters for any conductor you wish to use.
5.2 Modify the MATLAB M0502.m Determine the phase admittance matrix
[yabc] in μS/mile for the three-phase overhead line of Problem 4.2.
5.3 Determine the phase admittance matrix in μS/mile for the two-phase line
of Problem 4.5.
5.4 Determine the phase admittance matrix in μS/mile for the single-phase
line of Problem 4.6.
5.5 Verify the results of Problems 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 using WindMil.
5.6 Determine the phase admittance matrix in μS/mile for the three-phase
line of Problem 4.8.
5.7 Modify the MATLAB script M0503.m to determine the phase admit-
tance matrix in μS/mile for the single-phase concentric neutral cable of
Problem 4.10.
5.8 Modify the MATLAB script M0503.m to determine the phase admit-
tance matrix for the three-phase concentric neutral line of Problem 4.11.
5.9 Verify the results of Problems 5.7 and 5.8 using WindMil.
5.10 Determine the phase admittance matrix in μS/mile for the single-phase
tape shielded cable line of Problem 4.13.
5.11 Determine the phase admittance for the three-phase tape shielded cable
line of Problem 4.14.
5.12 Verify the results of Problems 5.10 and 5.11 using WindMil.
5.13 Modify the MATLAB script M0502.m to determine the shunt admit-
tance matrix for the parallel overhead lines of Problem 4.16.
5.14 Modify the MATLAB script M0505.m to determine the shunt admit-
tance matrix for the underground concentric neutral parallel lines of
Problem 4.17.
110 Distribution System Modeling and Analysis
WINDMIL ASSIGNMENT
Add to the WindMil System 1 a single-phase line connected to Node 2. Call this
“System 2”. The single-phase line is on phase b and is defined in Problem 4.5. Call
this line OH-2. At the end of the line, connect a node and call it Node 3. The load at
Node 3 is 200 kVA at a 90 % lagging power factor. The load is modeled as a constant
impedance load.
Determine the voltages at the nodes on a 120-volt base and the currents flowing
on the two lines.
REFERENCES
1. Glover, J. D., Sarma, M., Power System Analysis and Design, PWS-Kent Publishing,
Boston, MA, 2nd Edition, 1995.
2. Arnold, T. P., Ed., Power Cable Manual, C.D. Mercier, Southwire Company, Carrollton,
Georgia, 2nd Edition, 1997.