Argus Nitrogen
Argus Nitrogen
ARGUS NITROGEN
Contents:
Methodology overview 2
Publication frequency 5
General methodology 5
Assessing price ranges 5
Spot and formula pricing 6
Terms6
Units6
Lot and cargo sizes 6
Products and specifications 6
Urea6
Ammonium sulphate (amsul) 6
Ammonium nitrate (AN) 7
Urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) 7
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) 7
Markets covered 7
Prilled urea 7
Granular urea 7
Ammonium sulphate 9
Ammonium nitrate
9
UAN solutions 10
CAN production costs 10
Natural gas prices 11
Freight rates 11
www.argusmedia.com
19 January 2005
METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE February 2025
Methodology overview •O
ther market information, to include spread values between
grades, locations, timings, and many other data.
Methodology rationale
Argus strives to construct methodologies that reflect the way the In many markets, the relevant methodology will assign a relatively
market trades. Argus aims to produce price assessments which higher importance to transactions over bids and offers, and a
are reliable indicators of commodity market values and are free relatively higher importance to bids and offers over other market
from distortion. As a result, the specific currencies, volume units, information. Certain markets however will exist for which such a
locations and other particulars of an assessment are determined by hierarchy would produce unreliable and non-representative price as-
industry conventions. sessments, and so the methodology must assign a different relative
importance in order to ensure the quality and integrity of the price
In the Nitrogen fertilizer markets, Argus publishes prices as laid out assessment. And even in markets for which the hierarchy normally
in the specifications and methodology guide. Argus uses the trading applies, certain market situations will at times emerge for which the
period deemed by Argus to be most appropriate, in consultation strict hierarchy would produce non-representative prices, requiring
with industry, to capture market liquidity. Argus to adapt in order to publish representative prices.
In order to be included in the assessment process, deals must meet Verification of transaction data
the minimum volume, delivery, timing and specification require- Reporters carefully analyse all data submitted to the price assess-
ments in our methodology. In illiquid markets, Argus assesses the ment process. These data include transactions, bids, offers, vol-
range within which product could have traded by applying a strict umes, counterparties, specifications and any other information that
process outlined later in this methodology. contributes materially to the determination of price. This high level
of care described applies regardless of the methodology employed.
Survey process Specific to transactions, bids, and offers, reporters seek to verify the
Argus price assessments are informed by information received from price, the volume, the specifications, location basis, and counter-
a wide cross section of market participants, including producers, party. In some transactional average methodologies, reporters also
consumers and intermediaries. Argus reporters engage with the in- examine the full array of transactions to match counterparties and
dustry by proactively polling participants for market data. Argus will arrive at a list of unique transactions. In some transactional average
contact and accept market data from all credible market sources methodologies, full details of the transactions verified are published
including front and back office of market participants and brokers. electronically and are accessible to subscribers. The deals are also
Argus will also receive market data from electronic trading platforms published in the daily report.
and directly from the back offices of market participants. Argus will
accept market data by telephone, instant messenger, email or other Several tests are applied by reporters in all markets to transactional
means. data to determine if it should be subjected to further scrutiny. If a
transaction has been identified as failing such a test, it will receive
Argus encourages all sources of market data to submit all market further scrutiny. For assessments used to settle derivatives and for
data to which they are a party that falls within the Argus stated many other assessments, Argus has established internal proce-
methodological criteria for the relevant assessment. Argus encour- dures that involve escalation of inquiry within the source’s company
ages all sources of market data to submit transaction data from and escalating review within Argus management. Should this pro-
back office functions. cess determine that a transaction should be excluded from the price
assessment process, the supervising editor will initiate approval
Throughout all markets, Argus is constantly seeking to increase and, if necessary, documentation procedures.
the number of companies willing to provide market data. Report-
ers are mentored and held accountable for expanding their pool Primary tests applied by reporters
of contacts. The number of entities providing market data can vary • Transactions not transacted at arm’s length, including deals
significantly from day to day based on market conditions. between related parties or affiliates.
• Transaction prices that deviate significantly from the mean of
For certain price assessments identified by local management, if more all transactions submitted for that day.
than 50pc of the market data involved in arriving at a price assessment • Transaction prices that fall outside of the generally observed
is sourced from a single party the supervising editor will engage in an lows and highs that operated throughout the trading day.
analysis of the market data with the primary reporter to ensure that the • Transactions that are suspected to be a leg of another trans-
quality and integrity of the assessment has not been affected. action or in some way contingent on an unknown transaction.
• Single deal volumes that significantly exceed the typical trans-
Market data usage action volume for that market.
In each market, Argus uses the methodological approach deemed • Transaction details that are identified by other market par-
to be the most reliable and representative for that market. Argus will ticipants as being for any reason potentially anomalous and
utilise various types of market data in its methodologies, to include: perceived by Argus to be as such.
• Transactions • Transaction details that are reported by one counterparty dif-
• Bids and offers ferently than the other counterparty.
2 www.argusmedia.com
19 January 2005
METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE February 2025
•A ny transaction details that appear to the reporter to be illogi- significantly narrows the band within which a commodity can be as-
cal or to stray from the norms of trading behaviour. This could sessed, and greatly increases the accuracy and consistency of the
include but is not limited to divergent specifications, unusual price series. The application of judgment is conducted jointly with
delivery location and counterparties not typically seen. the supervising editor, in order to be sure that guidelines below are
• Transactions that involve the same counterparties, the same being followed. Valuation metrics include the following:
price and delivery dates are checked to see that they are
separate deals and not one deal duplicated in Argus records. Relative value transactions
Frequently transactions occur which instead of being an outright
Secondary tests applied by editors for transactions purchase or sale of a single commodity, are instead exchanges of
identified for further scrutiny commodities. Such transactions allow reporters to value less liquid
markets against more liquid ones and establish a strong basis for
Transaction tests the exercise of judgment.
• The impact of linkage of the deal to possible other transac-
tions such as contingent legs, exchanges, options, swaps, •E xchange one commodity for a different commodity in the
or other derivative instruments. This will include a review of same market at a negotiated value.
transactions in markets that the reporter may not be covering. • Exchange delivery dates for the same commodity at a negoti-
• The nature of disagreement between counterparties on trans- ated value.
actional details. • Exchange a commodity in one location for the same com-
• The possibility that a deal is directly linked to an offsetting modity at another location at a negotiated value.
transaction that is not publicly known, for example a “wash
trade” which has the purpose of influencing the published Bids and offers
price. If a sufficient number of bids and offers populate the market, then
• The impact of non-market factors on price or volume, includ- the highest bid and the lowest offer can be assumed to define the
ing distressed delivery, credit issues, scheduling issues, boundaries between which a deal could be transacted.
demurrage, or containment.
Comparative metrics
Source tests The relative values between compared commodities are readily
• The credibility of the explanation provided for the outlying discussed in the market and can be discovered through dialogue
nature of the transaction. with market participants. These discussions are the precursor to
• The track record of the source. Sources will be deemed more negotiation and conclusion of transactions.
credible if they
• Regularly provide transaction data with few errors. •C omparison to the same commodity in another market centre.
• Provide data by Argus’ established deadline. • Comparison to a more actively traded but slightly different
• Quickly respond to queries from Argus reporters. specification commodity in the same market centre.
• Have staff designated to respond to such queries. • Analysis of prices in forward markets for physically deliverable
• How close the information receipt is to the deadline for commodity that allow extrapolation of value into the prompt
information, and the impact of that proximity on the validation timing for the commodity assessed.
process. • Comparison to the commodity’s primary feedstock or primary
derived product(s).
Assessment guidelines • Comparison to trade in the same commodity but in a different
When insufficient, inadequate, or no transaction information exists, modality (as in barge versus oceangoing vessel) or in a dif-
or when Argus concludes that a transaction based methodology will ferent total volume (as in full cargo load versus partial cargo
not produce representative prices, Argus reporters will make an as- load).
sessment of market value by applying intelligent judgment based on
a broad array of factual market information. Reporters must use a Volume minimums and transaction data thresholds
high degree of care in gathering and validating all market data used Because of the varying transportation infrastructure found in all com-
in determining price assessments, a degree of care equal to that modity markets, Argus typically does not establish thresholds strictly
applying to gathering and validating transactions. The information on the basis of a count of transactions, as this could lead to unreliable
used to form an assessment could include deals done, bids, offers, and non-representative assessments. Instead, minimum volumes are
tenders, spread trades, exchange trades, fundamental supply and typically established which may apply to each transaction accepted, to
demand information and other inputs. the aggregate of transactions, to transactions which set a low or high
assessment or to other volumetrically relevant parameters.
The assessment process employing judgment is rigorous, replica-
ble, and uses widely accepted valuation metrics. These valuation For price assessments used to settle derivatives, Argus will seek to
metrics mirror the process used by physical commodity traders establish minimum transaction data thresholds and when no such
to internally assess value prior to entering the market with a bid or threshold can be established Argus will explain the reasons. These
offer. Applying these valuation metrics along with sound judgment thresholds will often reflect the minimum volumes necessary to
3 www.argusmedia.com
19 January 2005
METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE February 2025
produce a transaction-based methodology, but may also establish various third-party data integrators. The Argus website also provides
minimum deal parameters for use by a methodology that is based access to prices, reports and news with various web-based tools.
primarily on judgment. All Argus prices are kept in a historical database and available for
purchase. Contact your local Argus office for information.
Should no transaction threshold exist, or should submitted data fall
below this methodology’s stated transaction data threshold for any Corrections to assessments
reason, Argus will follow the procedures outlined elsewhere in this Argus will on occasion publish corrections to price assessments
document regarding the exercise of judgment in the price assess- after the publication date. We will correct errors that arise from cleri-
ment process. cal mistakes, calculation errors, or a misapplication of our stated
methodology. Argus will also correct errors that arise from mistakes
Minimum transaction thresholds made by market participants in reporting transactions. Argus will not
retroactively assess markets based on new information learned after
Minimum trade volume for inclu- the assessments are published.
Assessment
sion in assessment
4 www.argusmedia.com
19 January 2005
METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE February 2025
methodology, Argus conducts reviews of all of its methodologies and Publication frequency
methodology documents on at least an annual basis.
Argus market report editors and management will periodically and Argus publishes the Argus Nitrogen report once a week on a Thurs-
as merited initiate reviews of market coverage based on a qualita- day evening in the UK
tive analysis that includes measurements of liquidity, visibility of
market data, consistency of market data, quality of market data and The weekly report is published 51 weeks of the year on a Thursday
industry usage of the assessments. Report editors will review: evening.
• Appropriateness of the methodology of existing assessments The weekly Argus Nitrogen report is not published for one week dur-
• Termination of existing assessments ing the Christmas/New Year holidays in the UK although the dates
• Initiation of new assessments of non-publication are dependent on when holidays fall within the
week.
The report editor will initiate an informal process to examine viability.
This process includes: A full publication schedule is available at www.argusmedia.com.
Argus will provide sufficient opportunity for stakeholders to analyse When there is sufficient liquidity and deals data are deemed reliable
and comment on changes, but will not allow the time needed to follow and representative, the price range will be defined on the low and the
these procedures to create a situation wherein unrepresentative or false high end of confirmed deals concluded throughout the trading week.
prices are published, markets are disrupted, or market participants are These deals must meet the minimum volumes and strict delivery tim-
put at unnecessary risk. Argus will engage with industry throughout this ing, as well as specifications as laid down in this methodology.
process in order to gain acceptance of proposed changes to method-
ology. Argus cannot however guarantee universal acceptance and will Information on transactions, bids and offers that lie outside the
act for the good order of the market and ensure the continued integrity specifications of timing, size, location and quality may be used in
of its price assessments as an overriding objective. assessing price ranges, but deals that lie within these specifications
are given most weight.
Following the consultation period, Argus management will com-
mence an internal review and decide on the methodology change. In markets that periodically lack liquidity, Argus may assess price
This will be followed by an announcement of the decision, which ranges based on a range of other market information including
will be published in the relevant Argus report and include a date for netbacks to more liquid markets and market fundamentals.
implementation. For prices used in derivatives, publication of stake-
holders’ formal comments that are not subject to confidentiality and
Argus’ response to those comments will also take place.
5 www.argusmedia.com
19 January 2005
METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE February 2025
Fob Black Sea ammonium sulphate prices are for trade of at least
Spot and formula pricing 2,000t.
Spot pricing refers to specific cargoes sold that are scheduled to For the nitrogen report, Argus considers cargoes as follows — typi-
load within 40 days of the sale being agreed. These prices are cash cal short sea routes in Europe — for example from Egypt — employ
prices, i.e. net of any credit. vessels of 5,000-6,000t. Deepsea voyages employ handysize ves-
sels and above:
Formula pricing is an arrangement where a buyer and seller agree
in advance that the price to be paid for a product delivered in the •H andysize 10,000-35,000t (the majority of deepsea nitrogen
future will be based on a pre-determined calculation, sometimes uti- trade)
lising published prices from Argus and/or other publications. Given • Handymax (35,000-49,000t)
that the exact nature of the calculation or the agreement between • Panamax (50,000-70,000t)
the parties is often private and confidential, and if the deal is con-
sidered a one-off (i.e not repeatable) then calculated netbacks are In the US domestic nitrogen market, a typical barge at New Orleans
not used in formulation of a spot price range. However, if a buyer (Nola) is 1,500st.
and seller use this method of pricing for multiple transactions on a
specific trade route, then the editor may use the deal in formulating
a spot price range using current known cfr levels, domestic prices in Products and specifications
the destination country and indicative freight rates.
Urea
Urea is a dry bulk fertilizer containing 46pc nitrogen by weight. It is pro-
Terms duced by combining ammonia with carbon dioxide, which is generated
during the production of ammonia. It is produced in two forms — prilled
Some transactions are conducted on a sight/cash basis, but where and granular. Both of these are widely used for direct application to
credit terms apply, e.g. up to 180 days, these are taken into account land. Granular urea is also often used as a feedstock for bulk blending
and subtracted from the price so that the published price is net of for NPK manufacture. Prilled urea is also used in a variety of industrial
credit or other terms. processes. Prices are only assessed based on deals concluded in the
agricultural sector. Sales to the industrial sector may be discussed in
the text, but will not form part of the assessment.
Units
Automotive grade urea (AGU) is low biuret prilled urea, contain-
Most prices are assessed in $/t, apart from US domestic assess- ing 46pc nitrogen by weight, and without a formaldehyde coating. It
ments, which are priced in short tons (st), European market assess- can be used — without the mixture of another higher purity urea —
ments, which are priced in €/t or £/t and the fca Geelong assess- to produce diesel exhaust fluid (DEF), AdBlue or Arla 32 as defined
ment, which is priced in Australian dollars per tonne. Argus Nitrogen by quality specifications set by ISO-22241. AGU contains no more
also includes reference prices for weekly US and European natural than 0.8pc by weight of biuret and 5mg/kg of aldehydes.
gas prices in $/million British thermal units ($/mn Btu).
Ammonium sulphate (amsul)
Ammonium sulphate (amsul) is a dry bulk fertilizer containing
Lot and cargo sizes 21pc nitrogen and 24pc sulphur. It is used for direct application in
agriculture, as a component in producing nitrogen fertilizers containing
For international trade, unless noted otherwise, the minimum lot size sulphur and as a raw material in making compound fertilizers. Am-
used for consideration and inclusion in the relevant price range is monium sulphate is produced primarily as a by-product or co-product
5,000t of a particular product (this includes part cargoes on larger of other processes, most commonly in the manufacture of caprolactam
vessels including other fertilizers and for which the freight rate may and acrylonitrile and also from steel making. Caprolactam grade am-
be more favourable – although this will be explained in the text). monium sulphate is sometimes referred to as standard or crystalline
ammonium sulphate. Steel grade ammonium sulphate is a lower qual-
Exceptions: US domestic prices, which are for one barge, assumed ity product and is often referred to as raw material grade.
to be carrying a minimum of 1,500st, with no set maximum number
of barges. There may be occasions when a barge is loaded with less The prices assessed refer to caprolactam grade ammonium sul-
quantity for reasons of low draught levels, but this will be explained fully phate, except where specified
6 www.argusmedia.com
19 January 2005
METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE February 2025
Ammonium nitrate (AN) suppliers, trading companies that buy urea from myriad producers
Ammonium nitrate (AN) is a dry bulk fertilizer containing 33.5- and distributors in the country. The main markets for Chinese urea
34.5pc nitrogen. It is used for direct application in agriculture. AN are India and Asia-Pacific.
can also be used as an explosive. The prices published in Argus
nitrogen refer only to agricultural grade AN. AN is classified as a Southeast Asia cfr
hazardous substance and various countries have introduced regula- The price of spot sales of prilled urea to southeast Asian markets
tions controlling its transport, storage and handling. including by not limited to the Philippines, Vietnam and Malaysia.
Prices are determined through conversations with producers, trad-
Urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) ing companies and end-users in the region.
Urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) solutions are a liquid fertilizer
typically containing 28-32pc nitrogen and consisting of 50pc urea Brazil cfr
and 50pc ammonium nitrate in liquid form. UAN is used in a minor- This price assessed is for all Brazilian ports. It is determined through
ity of countries owing to the more sophisticated handling, storage conversations with trading companies and end-buyers.
and application required. UAN is not a hazardous substance and
requires only mild steel tanks to transport and store it. Mexico east coast cfr
This price assessed is for all Mexican east coast ports, the main
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) destinations for imports of prilled urea into the country. It is determined
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) is a dry bulk fertilizer contain- through conversations with export producers, trading companies and
ing 26-28pc nitrogen. It is used for direct application in agriculture. end-buyers. Mexico is a major outlet for prilled urea from Russia.
7 www.argusmedia.com
19 January 2005
METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE February 2025
8 www.argusmedia.com
19 January 2005
METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE February 2025
US Gulf (cfr metric) assessed on the basis of discussions with producers, traders and buy-
See Urea (granular) Nola cfr t import eq in the Argus North Ameri- ers active in the region. The price is assessed in US dollars per tonne.
can Fertilizer methodology.
Fob northwest Europe (standard caprolactam)
Nola barge weighted average This price covers exports of standard (also known as crystalline) capro-
See Urea (granular) Nola urea delivery month barge-weighted aver- lactam grade ammonium sulphate from key ports in northwest Europe.
age in the Argus North American Fertilizer methodology. The product is made up of 20-21pc nitrogen and 24pc water-soluble
sulphur. The standard caprolactam grade is a smaller type of granule
French Atlantic fca euro than granular caprolactam grade. The price is assessed on the basis
This price is based on imported granular urea sold from the ports of La of discussions with producers, traders and buyers active in the region.
Pallice, Bordeaux and Bayonne. The main supply sources are Egypt The price is assessed in US dollars per tonne.
and Algeria, with additional urea sold from Russia, the Netherlands and
from the Middle East. Prices are determined from conversations with Fob China (granular caprolactam)
importers, traders and producers involved in the trade. This price covers exports of compacted and granular caprolactam
grade ammonium sulphate from a range of ports in China. The price
Granular urea Baltic fob is assessed on the basis of discussions with producers, traders and
This price is derived from sales of Russian and Belarusian urea buyers active in the region.
made through Baltic ports, mainly on a fob basis to traders, but also
on a cfr or fca basis to end-buyers. Both the fob sales and prices Fob China (standard caprolactam)
netted back from cfr/fca sales are used in determining the weekly This price covers exports of standard caprolactam grade ammo-
price range. Prices are determined by conversations with produc- nium sulphate from a range of ports in China. The price is assessed
ers and trading companies active in the region and with buyers in on the basis of discussions with producers, traders and buyers
European and American markets. active in the region.
9 www.argusmedia.com
19 January 2005
METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE February 2025
10 www.argusmedia.com
19 January 2005
METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE February 2025
Liquid
Klaipeda-Rouen (25,000-30,000t)
11 www.argusmedia.com