Instruments for Validating Course Modules (with Sample Statements)
1. Expert Validation Checklist or Rubric
Used by experts to assess the quality, relevance, and alignment of the course module
content.
Criteria and Sample Statements:
- Objectives Alignment with Content: "The learning objectives are clearly defined and are
aligned with the module content."
- Clarity and Coherence of Topics: "The topics are clearly explained and logically sequenced
throughout the module."
- Appropriateness of Instructional Strategies: "The strategies used are appropriate for the
target learners and promote active learning."
- Accuracy of Information: "The information provided in the module is factually accurate
and up-to-date."
- Organization and Sequence: "The module content is well-organized, and concepts are
presented in a progressive and cohesive manner."
- Cultural and Contextual Relevance: "The content is culturally sensitive and relevant to the
learners’ context."
Rating Scale: 4 – Strongly Agree | 3 – Agree | 2 – Disagree | 1 – Strongly Disagree
2. Acceptability and Usability Questionnaire
Used to gather perceptions of users (students/teachers) on how usable and practical the
module is.
Criteria and Sample Statements:
- Language Clarity: "The module uses simple, clear, and understandable language."
- Engagement Level: "The module includes activities and content that maintain learner
interest."
- Practicality of Activities: "The learning activities are practical and achievable within the
classroom context."
- Relevance to Curriculum: "The module content is aligned with the learning competencies
in the curriculum."
- Ease of Use: "The module is easy to navigate and use without requiring additional
support."
Rating Scale: 5 – Very Acceptable | 4 – Acceptable | 3 – Neutral | 2 – Unacceptable | 1 – Very
Unacceptable
3. Perceived Usefulness and Effectiveness Survey
Designed to assess how learners or teachers perceive the effectiveness of the module in
achieving learning outcomes.
Criteria and Sample Statements:
- Enhances Understanding: "The module helped me gain a better understanding of the
topic."
- Critical Thinking: "The module encouraged me to think critically and reflectively."
- Skill Development: "The activities in the module helped me develop relevant skills."
- Learning Motivation: "The module increased my motivation to learn the subject."
- Application of Knowledge: "The module allowed me to apply what I learned in real-world
contexts."
Rating Scale: 5 – Strongly Agree | 4 – Agree | 3 – Neutral | 2 – Disagree | 1 – Strongly
Disagree
4. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) Guide
Used to collect in-depth qualitative feedback from students or teachers.
Guide Questions:
- What aspects of the module did you find most useful or effective?
- Were there any parts of the module that were unclear or confusing?
- How did the module impact your learning or teaching experience?
- What improvements would you suggest for the module?
- Would you recommend the module to other learners or educators? Why or why not?
5. Module Evaluation Form (DepEd/CHED-Aligned)
Based on national standards to evaluate the quality of instructional materials.
Criteria and Sample Statements:
- Curriculum Alignment: "The module content is aligned with national standards and
learning competencies."
- Pedagogical Soundness: "The module incorporates sound pedagogical principles and
practices."
- Assessment Strategies: "The assessment tools in the module are appropriate and aligned
with the objectives."
- Inclusivity and Accessibility: "The module is inclusive and accessible to diverse types of
learners."
- Technical and Visual Presentation: "The module layout, design, and visuals enhance
understanding and engagement."
Rating Scale: 5 – Excellent | 4 – Good | 3 – Fair | 2 – Needs Improvement | 1 – Poor
