Topic: Discussing the Israel-Palestine conflict and the role played by

external stakeholders
Introduction
The Israel-Palestine conflict is a dispute that initially began in 1947, with the UN Partition
Plan for Palestine resulting in the disapproval of multiple countries from the Arab League.
The first Arab-Israeli war broke out, and this is, according to many, the actual start of the
Israel-Palestine conflict. It is also argued that this conflict started as early as 1920 with the
intercommunal conflict of Mandatory Palestine. In recent years, the conflict had essentially
reached a stalemate until the 7th of October 2023. This is when the Hamas militants, along
with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, launched attacks in Israel, killing hundreds, with Israel
responding with bombing campaigns in the Gaza Strip and escalating the situation into what
it is today. One crucial point to take note of is that this conflict is not just between Israel and
Hamas; other vital actors are essential to understanding how this conflict pans out.
Background & Context
One of the central issues in the contemporary Israel-Palestine conflict is the question of
statehood and self-determination. The establishment of Israel in 1948 and subsequent
territorial changes have left both Israelis and Palestinians with competing national
aspirations. The political landscape is marked by the ongoing debate over the two-state
solution, with international actors, including the United Nations, advocating for the creation
of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. The lack of progress in achieving a two-
state solution has gained attention to alternative proposals. Some advocate for a one-state
solution, emphasizing equal rights for Israelis and Palestinians within a single democratic
state. However, this idea faces significant challenges, including security, identity, and
governance issues. External stakeholders continue to exert influence on the Israel-Palestine
conflict. The United States, a key ally of Israel, has traditionally played a significant role in
mediating peace efforts. However, shifts in U.S. administrations have led to variations in
approach, with some administrations emphasizing a more assertive role in pushing for
negotiations. In contrast, others focus on regional dynamics and
agreements. The role of Arab states is noteworthy, particularly considering recent diplomatic
developments. The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020, marked a historic normalization of
relations between Israel and some Arab countries, including the United Arab Emirates and
Bahrain. This shift has altered regional dynamics and introduced new opportunities for
cooperation, but it has also raised concerns about prioritizing normalization over the
Palestinian question. International organizations, including the UN and the European Union,
continue to play a crucial role in addressing human rights violations and promoting peace
initiatives. The situation in the Gaza Strip, marked by periodic conflicts and humanitarian
crises, has drawn international attention and calls for accountability for alleged war crimes.
The role of NGOs in documenting human rights abuses and providing aid to affected
populations remains essential in shaping global perceptions and influencing policy decisions.
The United Nations has been actively engaged in efforts to resolve the Israel-Palestine
conflict through diplomatic means and multilateral initiatives. They have consistently
advocated for a two-state solution, emphasizing the establishment of an independent and
viable Palestinian state coexisting peacefully with Israel. Various resolutions, such as UN
Security Council Resolution 242 and 338, have formed the basis for peace negotiations.
Additionally, peacekeeping missions have been supported in the region, aiming to maintain
stability and protect civilians. Despite these efforts, challenges persist, including issues
related to the status of Jerusalem, refugees, and settlements. Geopolitical tensions, differing
interpretations of international law, and the complex historical and political context of the
conflict have hampered the effectiveness of those initiatives. Economic disparities between
Israel and the Palestinian territories contribute to the complexity of the conflict. The
development of Israeli settlements in the West Bank has been a contentious issue, with
implications for the viability of a future Palestinian state. Economic cooperation, such as
trade and labor relations, also shapes the dynamics between Israelis and Palestinians,
influencing both short-term stability and long-term prospects for peace.

Key State actors and non-state actors

Israel
Since its creation, Israel has fought multiple wars, including the 6 Day War and the Yom
Kippur War. With the recent events in 2023, Israel has been taking an extremely aggressive
stance towards Palestine, seizing transport routes and blocking access to electricity and
water. The Defence Minister of Israel has openly stated that this is a “Complete Siege” on the
Gaza Strip in response to the recent Hamas Attacks. Israel has been accused of multiple war
crimes ranging from targeting civilian hotspots to attacking medical and foreign aid workers.
However, international responses to these attacks have been mixed. The Western states,
including the US and the UK, have stated their support for Israel. At the same time, the Arab
States of the Middle East have been more vocal about their condemnation of the situation,
creating a larger rift between supporters of Israel and those of Palestine.
Palestinian National Authority
The PLA is a Palestinian governing body that has partial control over some regions of the
West Bank due to the agreements under the Oslo Accords. After the events of the Battle of
Gaza, Hamas took de facto control over the Gaza Strip despite the PLA’s claims over it. The
PLA has recently been sidelined in the conflict between Israel and Hamas but continues to
exert some level of control over the Bank.
Hamas
Hamas is the radical Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, formed in the 1980s. The
recent attack on Israel’s south was the most significant in Israeli history and was fueled by
general Palestinian dissent for Israeli occupation and influence in the Gaza Strip. Reports
claim that Hamas has been funded by Iran, with some protection for its leaders from Turkey.
Both Israel and Hamas are officially in a state of war, and with most of the world labeling
Hamas as a terrorist group, potential solutions to the conflict are almost guaranteed to end
with bloodshed.
USA
The US has shown high, unwavering support for Israel, and this sentiment has stood through
the current crisis. Across history, the US has continued to veto critical UNSC resolutions
condemning Israel for its crimes against Palestinians and has provided Israel with crucial
economic and military aid. Recent events by the current administration, however, could lead
to a potential shift in US policy towards Gaza, as US President Joe Biden has expressed his
frustration with the Israeli PM before and has been taking a slight halt in support over the
last few weeks as of December 2023. It is unclear in what direction US foreign policy will shift
in light of the upcoming 2024 Presidential elections.
Syria
Syria has, surprisingly, taken a heavy stance against Israel, calling out the country’s attacks on
Palestinian hospitals and civilians despite the Syrian government allegedly doing the same.
Syrian President Bashar Assad has made multiple speeches at conferences, including the
Arab League summit, where he criticized Israel’s brutality and criticized normalizing relations
with Israel. However, it is essential to note that Syria still maintains mixed ties with Hamas
but has expressed solidarity with Gaza.
Hezbollah
Hezbollah has always maintained a clear stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict and continues
to stand with Palestine and Hamas leadership in Gaza. Israel has stated previously that they
are not looking for a conflict with Hezbollah but will respond necessarily if they choose to do
so. Hezbollah, on the other hand, has been reluctant to engage in a full-scale war, instead
preferring to conduct small-scale border clashes with the IDF whilst forming stronger
alliances with the leadership in Gaza. Hezbollah’s true motives for the future of the conflict
are currently unknown, but constant shootings between the IDF and Hezbollah militants
continue to sour already tense relations.
Problems
Veto Power in the UN Security Council
The use of veto power by influential countries in the UN Security Council has hindered the
passing of resolutions condemning certain actions, impacting the perceived fairness of the
UN's involvement
Regional Relations and Displacement
The conflict has impacted regional relations, leading to concerns about the displacement of
Palestinians and the potential for further destabilization in the region
Influence on Peace Negotiations
The influence of external stakeholders on peace negotiations and the two-state solution has
been a point of contention, with different countries and organizations having varying levels
of influence and
Humanitarian and Security Repercussions
The involvement of external stakeholders has raised concerns about the humanitarian and
security repercussions of the conflict, with different parties expressing varying levels of
support and condemnation for specific actions
Influence on Palestinian Elections and Reconciliation
There are calls for external stakeholders to create space for Palestinian elections and
reconciliation, while also pressing for a long-term truce in Gaza, highlighting the need for
balanced and constructive involvement

Solutions
Reforming the UN Security Council
Addressing the issue of veto power in the UN Security Council could involve reforming the
structure of the council to ensure greater representation and fairness in decision-making
Promoting Regional Cooperation
Encouraging regional cooperation and dialogue could help address concerns about
displacement and regional destabilization, potentially leading to more constructive
engagement in the conflict
Balanced and Constructive Involvement
External stakeholders could aim to adopt a more balanced and constructive approach to
their involvement in the conflict, focusing on promoting peace negotiations and supporting
the two-state solution.
Addressing Humanitarian and Security Concerns
External stakeholders could work to address the humanitarian and security concerns related
to the conflict, such as supporting the provision of aid and promoting measures to reduce
violence and protect civilians
Supporting Palestinian Elections and Reconciliation
External stakeholders could support the holding of Palestinian elections and promote
reconciliation efforts, potentially leading to a more stable and representative Palestinian
leadership.
Engaging with Civil Society
Engaging with civil society organizations and promoting grassroots initiatives could help build
support for peace and reconciliation efforts, potentially leading to more sustainable
solutions.
Promoting Economic Development
Promoting economic development in the region could help address some of the underlying
causes of the conflict, such as poverty and unemployment, potentially leading to greater
stability and cooperation.
Addressing Settlements and Borders
Addressing the issue of settlements and borders could involve promoting dialogue and
negotiation between the parties involved, potentially leading to more constructive
engagement and progress towards a resolution.
Encouraging Dialogue and Negotiation
Encouraging dialogue and negotiation between the parties involved could help build trust
and understanding, potentially leading to more constructive engagement and progress
towards a resolution.
Addressing Root Causes
Addressing the root causes of the conflict, such as historical grievances and identity issues,
could promote greater understanding and empathy between the parties involved, potentially
leading to more sustainable solutions.
Promoting International Law
Promoting respect for international law and human rights could help address some of the
underlying causes of the conflict, such as discrimination and inequality, potentially leading to
greater stability and cooperation.
Supporting Grassroots Peacebuilding
Supporting grassroots peacebuilding initiatives could help build support for peace and
reconciliation efforts, potentially leading to more sustainable solutions.
Encouraging Youth Engagement
Encouraging youth engagement in peace and reconciliation efforts could help build support
for sustainable solutions, potentially leading to greater stability and cooperation in the
region.
Promoting Interfaith Dialogue
Promoting interfaith dialogue and understanding could help address some of the underlying
causes of the conflict, such as religious tensions and misunderstandings, potentially leading
to more constructive engagement and progress toward a resolution.
Addressing External Interference
Addressing the issue of external interference in the conflict could involve promoting greater
transparency and accountability in the involvement of external stakeholders, potentially
leading to more constructive engagement and progress towards a resolution.

Pre mods
1. Emphasizing the need for a balanced and constructive involvement of external
stakeholders in the peace negotiations and the two-state solution.
Delegates of the House,
The Israel-Palestine conflict demands a balanced and constructive involvement of
external stakeholders in the peace negotiations and the two-state solution. The recent
events in Gaza have underscored the urgent need for a more proactive and impartial
approach. We must press for a long-term truce in Gaza, create space for Palestinian
elections and reconciliation, and ensure the protection of civilians and civilian
infrastructure. It is time to transform words into action and work towards a
sustainable and just resolution for all parties involved.
Thank you!
 2. Bearing in mind the humanitarian and security repercussions of the conflict and the
varying levels of support and condemnation for specific actions by different external
parties.
Esteemed Delegates,
Bearing in mind the humanitarian and security repercussions of the Israel-Palestine
conflict and the varying levels of support and condemnation for specific actions by
different external parties, we must take a balanced and constructive approach to our
involvement in the peace negotiations and the two-state solution. We must prioritize
the protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure, promote regional cooperation
and dialogue, and support the provision of aid to those in need. It is time to work
towards a sustainable and just resolution for all parties involved.
Thank you!
3. Acknowledging the impact of the conflict on regional relations and the concerns about
the displacement of Palestinians, which may lead to further destabilization in the
region.
Distinguished Delegates,
We acknowledge the impact of the Israel-Palestine conflict on regional relations and
the concerns about the displacement of Palestinians, which may lead to further
destabilization in the region. We must prioritize the protection of civilians and civilian
infrastructure, promote regional cooperation and dialogue, and support the provision
of aid to those in need. We must also work towards a sustainable and just resolution
for the benefit of all parties involved, based on international law and relevant United
Nations resolutions.
Thank you!
_______________________________________________________________________
It's important to approach discussions on sensitive geopolitical issues, such as the
Israel-Palestine conflict, with a balanced and unbiased perspective. Hezbollah, a
Lebanese political and military organization, is a non-state actor with significant
regional influence. When discussing the conflict and the role of external stakeholders,
it's crucial to consider various viewpoints and be aware of potential biases.
While Hezbollah is known for its support of Palestinian causes, it's important to note
that the organization has been designated as a terrorist group by several countries,
including the United States and the European Union. This designation is based on its
involvement in armed conflicts, its support for Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria, and
its alleged terrorist activities.
 If you are interested in researching the Israel-Palestine conflict and the role of external
stakeholders, consider exploring the following areas:
Historical Background:
 Examine the historical context of the Israel-Palestine conflict, including the events leading to
the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 and subsequent developments.
 Explore the key turning points and conflicts over the years, such as the Six-Day War (1967)
and the Oslo Accords (1993).
External Stakeholders:
 Analyze the role of external stakeholders, including neighboring countries, international
organizations, and global powers, in influencing the dynamics of the conflict.
 Investigate the diplomatic, political, and military support provided by various countries to
Israel and the Palestinians.
Hezbollah's Involvement:
 Examine Hezbollah's historical background, goals, and involvement in regional conflicts,
including its support for the Palestinian cause.
 Analyze the organization's relationship with Iran and Syria, as well as its role in Lebanon.
International Law and Resolutions:
 Consider the impact of international law and relevant United Nations resolutions on the
Israel-Palestine conflict.
 Examine how the international community addresses issues such as settlements, refugees,
and the status of Jerusalem.
Peace Processes:
 Evaluate the various peace processes and initiatives to resolve the conflict, such as the Camp
David Summit, the Oslo Accords, and the Annapolis Conference.
 Analyze the challenges and successes of these peace efforts.
 Remember to approach the topic with an open mind, considering diverse perspectives, and
relying on reputable sources to ensure a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the
complex issue. Additionally, be cautious about potential biases and ensure your research is
well-balanced and evidence-based.
Resistance Against Israeli Occupation:
 Supporters argue that Hezbollah emerged as a resistance movement in response to Israel's
occupation of Lebanese territory, particularly during the 1982 invasion of Lebanon.
 They emphasize Hezbollah's role in pushing Israeli forces out of southern Lebanon in 2000,
which some view as a victory for the Lebanese resistance.
Social Services and Community Support:
 Supporters highlight Hezbollah's provision of social services, including schools, hospitals,
and welfare programs, as a means of garnering support and addressing the needs of the
Lebanese population.
Role in Fighting Extremism:
 Some argue that Hezbollah has played a role in combating extremist groups, such as ISIS,
particularly in Syria. Supporters contend that this has contributed to regional stability.
Political Participation:
 Supporters point to Hezbollah's involvement in Lebanese politics and argue that its
participation in the government is a legitimate expression of the organization's political
objectives.

Speech
The Israel-Palestine conflict, evolving since 1947, is deeply influenced by external
stakeholders. Recent events in 2023, marked by heightened tensions, emphasize the urgency
for a balanced and constructive approach. Key players, including the United States and
regional entities like Hezbollah, shape the conflict's dynamics. Addressing humanitarian
concerns, supporting grassroots initiatives, and fostering regional cooperation are essential
for a just and sustainable resolution. It is imperative to navigate the geopolitical complexities
and work collectively toward a future of stability and cooperation in the region.
___________________________________________________________________________
Hezbollah's involvement in the Israel-Palestine conflict is a complex and multifaceted issue
that has significant implications for the region's stability and security. The search results
provide insights into the nature of Hezbollah's involvement, its relationship with Hamas and
other Palestinian groups, and the potential for escalation of the conflict.
Hezbollah is a powerful political and military force in Lebanon, with close ties to Iran and a
long history of involvement in regional conflicts. The group was established in 1982 in
response to Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon and has since evolved into a major
player in Lebanese politics and a significant military force in the region. Hezbollah shares
Iran's Shia revolutionary ideology and supports the Palestinian cause, opposing Israel.
The search results highlight Hezbollah's involvement in the ongoing conflict between Hamas
and Israel in Gaza, which has significantly increased the cost of an Israeli ground invasion in
Gaza. Hezbollah's overarching goals are to preserve Hamas' authority in the Gaza Strip and
prevent displacement of Palestinians. Consequently, the scope of Hezbollah's operations in
southern Lebanon is expected to escalate as the dynamics of the conflict in Gaza evolve
Hezbollah's intervention in the current war to try to prevent an Israeli ground invasion of the
Gaza Strip has restored its status in the eyes of many Arabs as a major resistance movement
against the Israeli occupation. By targeting Israeli military infrastructure, Hezbollah has sought
to change the rules of engagement with Israel. The group has methodically targeted and
destroyed Israel's advanced surveillance systems, including surveillance towers and
eavesdropping and jamming devices, which enable Israel to monitor all movement along the
Lebanese side of the border. This has not only compromised Israel's espionage capacity and
granted Hezbollah greater maneuverability but has also enabled Hezbollah to extend its
targets beyond Israeli-occupied Lebanese territories, such as the Shebaa Farms and Kfar
Shuba Hills, to Israeli sites along the border strip
Hezbollah's stance on the Gaza conflict is directly tied to on-the-ground developments. The
party's overarching goals are to preserve Hamas' authority in the Gaza Strip and prevent
displacement of Palestinians. Consequently, the scope of Hezbollah's operations in southern
Lebanon is expected to escalate as the dynamics of the conflict in Gaza evolve
The search results also highlight the complex geopolitical dynamics at play, including the
influence of Iran and the impact on regional stability. Hezbollah's close ties to Iran have been
a source of concern for Israel and other regional powers, who view the group as a proxy for
Iranian interests in the region. The search results suggest that Iran has been trying to bring
together its various militias and proxies into what it calls the "Axis of Resistance," which
includes Hezbollah and other groups
The potential for escalation of the conflict is a major concern, with the search results
highlighting the possibility of a wider, regional war. Hezbollah is one of the most lethal
militant groups in the Middle East, with battle-hardened fighters who have fought in Iraq and
Syria. The group also has approximately 150,000 missiles of various ranges that can inflict
substantial damage on Israeli cities. In his speeches, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah has
warned that skirmishing between Israel and Hezbollah could escalate into full-scale war
In conclusion, the search results provide a glimpse into the complex and multifaceted nature
of Hezbollah's involvement in the Israel-Palestine conflict. The group's close ties to Iran, its
military capabilities, and its support for Hamas and the Palestinian cause have significant
implications for the region's stability and security. The potential for escalation of the conflict
is a major concern, and efforts to address the underlying issues and promote peace and
stability in the region are essential