Jhum Publication
Jhum Publication
Copyright © ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region. All rights reserved
November, 2017
Correct citation : Prakash N, Roy S S, Ansari M A, Sharma S K, Punitha P, Sailo B and Singh I M. 2017.
Jhum Improvement for Sustaining Farm Livelihood and Natural Resource
Conservation in North Eastern Hill Region : Vistas And Frontiers. 110 Pages,
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Meghalaya, India.
Published by :
Director
ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region
Umroi Road, Umiam, Meghalaya
Printed at :
R.B. Printing House, Nagamapal, Imphal, Manipur
CONTENT
Introduction
Traditional shifting cultivation or Jhum is the most important livelihood of farming
community of Arunachal Pradesh. Around 52 per cent of gross cropped area of Arunachal
Pradesh is under Jhum cultivation. The difficult topography, inhospitable terrain, incessant
rains and harsh climatic conditions in the hilly regions of Arunachal Pradesh led these
indigenous communities to adopt this age old practice of Jhuming. The traditional Jhum
cultivation was found to be economically and energetically efficient compared to other form
of agriculture (terrace or valley cultivation) in heavy rainfall areas of the hill tracts of
Arunachal Pradesh with average annual rainfall of above 3500 mm. Recently, the facet of
Jhum cultivation is changing towards a detrimental farming system with rise in human
population density in the hills and lowering of fallow period not giving ample time to restore
soil fertility and rejuvenate the lost of flora and fauna. The role of Jhum is being widely
recognized for ecologically sustainable and economically viable form of agriculture (FAO
2014). Though the practice is being considered to be major factor responsible for loss of
biodiversity and causing imbalance in the ecosystem, but the fact remains that the majority
of the world mega biodiversity area coincide with the area occupied by the indigenous
people practicing similar system of agriculture from ages. The entire Jhum system in
Arunachal Pradesh depends on the natural indicators and seasons that governs their stages
of activities like selection of land, clearance & burning, sowing, harvesting etc. Integrated
Farming System (IFS) is found to be a vital step for the improvement of Jhum cultivation. The
Jhumias traditionally follow the technique of crop diversification that should be encouraged
and promoted through planned research for suitable cropping sequence. Agri-horti-silvi-
pastoral system or multi-storey system and agroforestry will be more successful in hilly
areas to support Jhum farmers.
Total area under jhum cultivation in Arunachal Pradesh
Around 52 per cent of gross cropped area of Arunachal Pradesh is under Jhum cultivation.
According to 2010-11 Census the area under shifting cultivation in different districts is Tirap
(1956 ha), Changlang (1522 ha), Lohit (1244 ha), Lower Dibang Valley (1266 ha), East Siang
(2801 ha), West Siang (3211 ha), Upper Siang (1101 ha), Upper Subansiri (2987 ha), Lower
Subansiri (2566 ha), Kurung Kumey (789 ha), Papum Pare (3001 ha), East Kameng (1563 ha),
West Kameng (108 ha) and Tawang (373). Total Jhum area is 24488 ha.
Characteristic of jhum cultivation
The major characteristics of the traditional jhum cultivation are: site selection and clearing,
burning, sowing, weeding, protection, harvesting and storage. Special and crucial decision
concerning the location, scheduling, crops and the labour inputs needs to be taken in each
stages of cultivation. This decision making process is very vital in the process and, though
needs to take care of the agro-climatic and environmental conditions, and are also moulded
by the social and cultural factors. The decision makers largely depend on the natural
indicators for making vital decisions. Each tribe has some location-specific traditional
calendar of events for jhum with different local names. A distinction is made by the native
tribes in the pattern of jhum based on the locality where it is undertaken. Even within the
same location, each site was found to have characterised by different time of sowing,
harvesting etc. depending upon altitude of the site and vicinity to habitat. Further the fellow
cycle is also very location-specific depending on nearby forest type and soil of the selected
site. jhum cycle has a very interesting and nature-scientific relation with the natural
indicators that worth further systematic study. Normally the jhum cycle begins in the month
of December-January with calls of some particular bird (Chou pou) or insects (Goi) or other
location specific indicators. This cycle involves selection of new plots based on
presence/absence of some selective vegetation. The selection criteria also depend on soil
type of the area and nature of crop planned to grow. Some sites are considered to be sacred
due to presence of some rare vegetation and likewise some areas nearby villages are
considered to be cursed and cutting of trees in such area is strictly prohibited. Some tribes
before felling of trees in common wastelands, they seek permission of deities. On one hand
their mercy is sought for felling the tree and on the other they are thanked for rearing the
tree for so long. During clearing of the forest they avoid cutting of some particular tree
species so as not to invoke the spirits of the woods. A particular mention may be made of
Sengri & Sengne (Ficus sp.), which are considered to be the abode of spirits and to cut them
or to use their wood as firewood is tabooed. It is followed by cutting and slashing of under
growth, shrubs, twigs and trees. Cutting and Slashing are done by a selected group of skilled
persons, and they use to cut trees of medium girth up to certain height keeping in mind the
crop variety that they are planning to grow at that particular site and keep the height of
slashed trees 6-8 inch lower than the expected height of the crop at its maturity. And also
they were found to be uniformly distributed throughout the field. The next cycle is in the
months of January-February with calls or coming of Pipiar birds or blooming of certain wild
flower like Bombax ceiba, and the cycle involves burning of slash and clearing of charred
remains. Very strict customs were followed while burning the slashed field in which the
persons responsible are not supposed to take full meal and the event is celebrated
overnight. The resulting ash was uniformly distributed throughout the field. This stage also
involves sowing of some early paddy and other location based crops. The months of
February-March are the third cycle that begins with singing of Pakyo tabo bird and flowering
of Mekahi (Phoebe Cooperiana). The main activities involve terracing of steep slopes and
higher areas, along with contours with half burnt old logs, weeds, stems, etc. Mainly sowing
of maize is done during this period. In March-April, sowing of some vegetables like
cucumber, cucurbits, chillies, ginger, beans, tapioca etc. are done randomly mainly in the
boundaries. Different tuber varieties are sown along the peripheries that act as live fence
for protection against animals. Mithuns (Bos frontalis), the most important domesticated
herbivore animal is generally kept under temporary community confinement called Lura
during the growing season. Chirping of Tuk pipipi and pinching birds starts the next cycle
during the months of April-May that goes on till the time the frog starts croaking. Here the
main activities involve weeding in pervious crops and sowing of paddy. The paddy is sown
by dibbling techniques where farmers make a small hole with the help of a sharpen stick and
drops two-three seed into the hole with expertise that they gain with years of experience
and practice. Sowing of paddy in some place also coincide with flowering of Gynocardia
odorata known locally with different names. The sowing is mainly done by women folks and
it involves minimum disturbance of soil. Almost all their festivals and rituals revolve around
Jhum and they keep close monitoring over their field for weeding and other activities. The
harvesting is done generally in the months of October-November in which the women plug
the head of rice bunch and carry them in bamboo basket called Egin. The dried grains are
stored in specially built rodent free granary called Nehu. Before using the new grains for
food, they very religiously keep some portion of grains separately for future seed purpose.
Mixing seed of different variety is tabooed.
The main crop grown in the jhum field is rice for their own consumption. Paddy is their
staple food and is also used to prepare their local beer apong. There are wide varieties of
local rice produced by the Galos in their jhum fields. Other important food crops grown are
the maize and millet as traditional substitutes and complementary to paddy. Since most of
the farmers produce for their own consumption, they grow different vegetables, fruits and
tuber crops, spices in the same land. Various crops are grown on the contour bunds where
the wooden poles are laid along the contour for soil conservation.
Vegetables grown include cucumber, pumpkin, beans, chilli, soybeans, gourds, tomato,
cabbage, brinjal, etc. Root crops are sown near tree stump or on the slope. These crops help
in soil conservation from erosion. Potato, sweet potato, root potato, turnip, beets, radish,
Yam, Cassava, Tapioca, Elephant’s foot yam, etc are some root crops grown in the jhum
fields. Usually creepers like cucumber, pumpkin, beans, etc are grown as margin crops as
they tend to disturb other crops and to demarcate field boundaries. Apple, orange, kiwi,
pineapple, banana, passion fruit are some of the fruits grown by the jhum farmers. Some
farmers have started cultivating Cash Crops like turmeric, ginger and large cardamom for
commercial purpose.
Impact of jhum cultivation on natural resources
Jhum was widely condemned as threat to biodiversity: both natural and agricultural. The
indigenous Jhumias maintain natural biological asset balance (the assets whose initial form
was determined by ecosystem of the location) rather than giving more priority to some
selected groups of biological assets. During the site selection for Jhum they strictly avoid
those locations that are dominated by rare or/and medicinally important plants. They avoid
felling certain big trees (regarding them as abode of spirit) as they knew its significance to
immediate ecosystem and its sustainability. Such big trees also provide habitat to
innumerable birds, animals and insects who are their guide in agricultural activities.
Associating such practices with rituals and customs make them moral and spiritual
responsibility of the society and individual. Jhum is concerned not only with the
preservation of flora-fauna, but those culture and traditions that evolved as a result of
interdependence of the inhabitant with their immediate environment. It also induces
understanding of nature and its phenomenon and their impact on society today and
tomorrow. They have very cordial relationship with the seasonal birds, insects and animals;
and are considered to be messenger of weather and fertility god, thus indiscriminate killing
is strictly prohibited. The indigenous community socialize the natural phenomenon and
social phenomenons are described in ecological terms. The Jhumias consider themselves
inside the system (ecosystem) which is by its nature a diverse system. Biodiversity is the
major source of information and people gathers information by interacting with their
immediate biological environment. In the biologist’s sense of the world, biological diversity
is the natural stock of genetic material within an ecosystem. The importance of genes lies on
the fact that they determine the particular characteristics of a given organism and encode
the information which determines the specific capabilities of that organism. Greater the
varieties in the gene pool, greater are the variety of organisms, characteristics and traits.
Beside forest biodiversity, agricultural bio-diversity is maintained by Jhumias. They preserve
their original crop varieties in a very religious way. They also use to grow diverse crops or
varieties as per land location and possible weather conditions. They have a huge repository
of germplasm which they maintain as per their culture and tradition. Under the given
environmental condition, a species is best to its own niche. The region under investigation is
the centre of origin of important crops like citrus, rice, etc. The crop wild relatives and
landraces maintained by indigenous community have been considered to be essential to
future viability of global food production irrespective of climate change. It is the people and
the practices associated with them, not the landscapes, conserve agricultural diversity. The
hesitation of indigenous Jhumias in adopting foreign varieties is a great step towards
biodiversity conservation because the uniform cultivated varieties that are now substituted
for the resident diversity worldwide is posing major threat to biodiversity. Studies found
that the lake of adequate stock of the species from which it might regenerate itself has been
the major reason behind any species being endangered. Traditional management system
like use of more varieties, species and landscape patches helps in conservation of
biodiversity as found in several studies across the globe. Grazing management through Lura
is another innovative technique of biodiversity conservation of Jhumias, in which during the
cropping and growing seasons all the Mithuns (Bos frontalis) of the community are
temporarily confined in a sufficiently large selected site (that provide adequate food and
water) which is changed every year. The confinement checks Mithuns from continuous, free
and random grazing of forest vegetation during the growing season, besides protecting
Jhum fields. During the growing and rainy season the confinement of Mithuns in Lura avoid
disturbance of soil surface due to treading that check soil erosion and compaction; and
allow free regeneration of grazed vegetations as well as seedling germination throughout
the forest. Jhum is mainly targeted as threat to climate change as it relies on fire, thus
dynamics through ages of observations. They lower incidence of insect and pest by proper
selection of date of sowing and other cultural management depending on lunar cycle.
Sowing during the days in the vicinity of Full Moon found to lower insect attack and favour
germination. Slashing medium girth plants to a certain height depending on the expected
height of the crop to be shown is a unique insect control technique of Jhumias. During initial
growth of the crop especially rice, the stumps acts as platform for birds to sit and feed on
the insects in the leaf of crop, but when the plant grow to maturity it outgrow the stumps
and avoid birds from feeding on its grains. Burning of vegetations at Jhum sites besides
adding carbon to the soil, also help neutralization of soil acidity. Soil acidity may be one of
the main reasons of prevalence of diseases and pests in these areas, but burning not only
control soil acidity but also help to get rid of spores of pests in the soil. The Jhumias are very
particular about fallow period and 15 years fallow was found to be sufficient for
regeneration of vegetation and rejuvenation of soil. For the tropical forest the fallow period
of minimum 10 years is generally sufficient for the recovery of the vegetation, but it
depends on the nature of soil and vegetation. The inspection of stem diameters of the
recovered plants indicates the rejuvenation of the soil and the vegetation. The approach of
Jhumias reflects that their culture coevolved with environment to create a sustainable food
procurement system.
Socio-cultural aspect of jhum cultivation
According to the oxford dictionaries shifting or jhum cultivation is defined as a form of
agriculture, in which an area of ground is cleared of vegetation and cultivated for a few
years and then abandoned for a new area until its fertility has been naturally restored.
Shifting cultivation is an age old practice that occupies a distinct place in the tribal
agriculture and its economy. It constitutes a vital part of the socio-economic framework of
the tribal life. Shifting cultivation is conventionally still prolonged by the people in the north
east region due to the difficult topography, inexorable rains and harsh climatic conditions.
Due to poor acidic content of the soil in the undulating terrain and the diversified flora and
fauna it creates difficulties in establishing an agro-ecosystem. Though shifting cultivation is
also considered to be an exploitative system which is destroying the nature by the optimal
use of its natural resources, deforestation and ecological exploitation it is considered to be
the major source of production in this parts of India i.e. the North-East India. Jhum
cultivation is not just a source of livelihood in the north east but is traditionally allied to the
culture, customs and ethnicity but to sum it up, entire tribal civilization and their life
envelops around it. In jhum both men and women are involved but women’s responsibility
is the most prominent of them all. In the entire process of jhum cycle while the men folk
performs the more laborious and scrupulous work which ranges from slashing and burning
of the woods from the jhum land, big and straight logs being sorted out and removed and
fencing being done, the women bag the task of clearing of undergrowth, big creepers and
climbers, the important jobs like field preparation, sowing, weeding, harvesting, husking,
thrashing, and the storage of crops.
In view of the fact that jhum fulfills their wholesome consumption needs for the entire jhum
year hence the farmers can be termed as self sufficient. They just depend on the market for
basic needs like salt, oil etc. But some economically more viable farmers also grows cash
crops like ginger, turmeric, large cardamom, etc and fruits like orange, kiwi, passion fruit,
apple etc in large scale. They have a great demand for these organic products in the national
market. Hence the prosperous and affluent farmers also become wholesale dealers and
employ several small scale production farmers who gains from such a business.
Ongoing schemes/projects of State and central government on Jhum improvement in
Arunachal Pradesh
S. Name of the Date of Facilities supposed to have Name of
N. scheme/project sanction been created/activities implementing
undertaken as per the agency
scheme/ project
Cultivation of Orange
plantation in 30 acres 5area.
6. Establishment of 23.05.201 Establishment of Bio Department of
Biotechnology Training and 1/ Technology Research Horticulture, Govt.
Development Centre at March, Training and Development of
Ziro 2013 centre at Ziro for taking Arunachal Pradesh
advantage of the
Bio diversity in the State.
7. Organic Cultivation of Kiwi 05.09.201 Kiwi cultivation in 72 ha., Department of
and Large Cardamom at 1/ with expected yield going Horticulture, Govt.
Ziro, Lower Subansiri August, upto 15 MT per ha. in the of
District, Arunachal Pradesh 2013 9th year of the project and Arunachal Pradesh
cardamom cultivation in 35
ha., with expected yield
going upto 3.54 MT per ha.
in the 9th year of the
project.
8. Establishment of Orange 26.03.201 Plantation of Orange over a Department of
Garden at Rantiwa of 2/ gross area of 288 ha. With an Horticulture, Govt.
Mebua-III Village, Seppa March, expected return (on of
Circle of East Kameng 2015 completion of the project of Arunachal Pradesh
District, Arunachal Pradesh 5540 kgs
of Orange per ha
9. Cultivation of Hi-Tech 26.03.201 Hi-Tech Orange plantaion in Department of
Orange Garden at Lutak 2/ 30 ha. area of community Horticulture, Govt.
Area of Gensi Circle, West March, land along with security of
Siang District, Arunachal 2013 fencing Khasi Mandarin Arunachal Pradesh
Pradesh orange is
to be cultivated. It is
supposed to have yields over
30 years period.
10. Compact Area Horticulture 26.03.201 The wasteland in the form of Department of
Garden with Orange, 2/ Jhumlands/abandoned Horticulture, Govt.
Pineapple and Banana March, jhuming sites under of
Cultivation at Radum 2015 optimum utilisation to Arunachal Pradesh
(Nyoya) Village under mitigate adverse ecological
Kamporijo Circle in Lower degradation and generate
Subansiri District, self
Arunachal Pradesh employment for rural people
to achieve sustainable
11. Establishment of Kiwi 23.03.201 The project will evolve a Department of
Garden at Dora Morey of 2/ holistic approach for Horticulture, Govt.
Hija Village under March, technology of
Lower Subansiri District, 2014 demonstration for Arunachal Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh reclamation of settled
cultivation areas
horti-silvi model.
12. Estt. Of orange/Large 7.09.2012 To establish orange & large Department of
Cardemom Horticulture / cardamom in 84 ha land. Horticulture, Govt.
Garden at Rikung Sept., Cultivation in 70 Ha area. of
village under Chetam circle 2015 Arunachal Pradesh
system and pineapple based cropping system were found most profitable with benefit cost
ratios of 3.68:1, 3.30:1 and 2.24:1, respectively.
Success stories of jhum improvement
Under NAIP-lll project of ICAR AP Centre, Basar Ms. Yalom Lida of Lida village of Gusar circle
of Daporijo started activities under the guidance of of ICAR scientists. She had 1.2 ha under
jhum land and her earnings were just enough to feed her family. Under NAIP intervention it
was targeted to convert her jhum land to settled cultivation by integrating livestock and
crops with fish farming. With her own cultivation practices she was harvesting the cereals
1.14 t/ha, vegetables 3.45 t/ha and tuber crops 5 t/ha with the respective area. The total
return from her traditional way of cultivation was 13896/- only. However, after integrating
the various components she has increased her production and productivity of cereals by
2.71 t/ha, vegetables 5.25 t/ha and started earning Rs. 73,800/- from the same area and
components. She mostly earned the said amount from livestock and fish.
Strategies and action points for jhum improvement in the state
Integrated Farming System (IFS) is found to be a vital step for the improvement of Jhum
cultivation. The basis behind IFS is direct use of by-product of one system as the input to
other production system for efficient use of resources and resource recycling within the
systems. The approach proved to be location specific, technically skill based, play multi-
dimensional role in fulfilling the domestic requirements, generate new employment
avenues, enable rational and sustainable use of resources, rejuvenation of resources and
increase resilience of the farming system. The system includes suitable combination of
agricultural crops, horticultural crops, multi-purpose trees and shrubs, livestock and
fisheries enabling resource poor farmers to become self-sufficient and economically
competitive by producing quality edible products from various enterprises with minimum
external inputs. The development of horticultural land use system with mixed horticultural
crops including fruits, vegetables, root crops, spices and ornamentals grown under optimum
management conditions is another crucial step for restoration of left Jhum and could be
remunerative on long term basis with least gestation cycle. Arunachal Pradesh has its
potential advantage and strength of surplus production of fruits, vegetables and spices
because of its climate, soils and interest of growers in managing orchards. Climatically,
Arunachal Pradesh has three distinct regions for growing temperate, subtropical and
tropical horticulture and different zone specific crops are grown. Apple, kiwi, walnut,
peanut, peach, plum, pear, saffron, large cardamom, star anise etc are grown in temperate
zone; orange, pineapple, straw berry, passion fruit, ginger, turmeric, tuber crops in
subtropical zone whereas mango, arecanut, coconut, jackfruit and guava are leading crops
of tropical horticulture of the state. Crop diversification is prime area of cropping system.
The Jhumias traditionally follow the technique of crop diversification that should be
encouraged and promoted through planned research for suitable cropping sequence.
Growing leguminous vegetables like cowpea, pea, French bean etc with heavy nutrient
feeder crop like ginger and turmeric proved beneficial for maintaining the fertility of the
their culture and tradition. Under the given environmental condition, a species is best to its
own niche. The crop wild relatives and landraces maintained by indigenous community have
been considered to be essential to future viability of global food production irrespective of
climate change. It is the people and the practices associated with them, not the landscapes,
conserve agricultural diversity. It is the uniform cultivated varieties that are now
substituting for the resident diversity worldwide is posing major threat to biodiversity. The
lack of adequate stock of the species from which it might regenerate itself has been the
major reason behind any species being endangered. Some of the species in mixed
cultivation system practiced by indigenous Jhumias help maintain ecosystem structure and
function. There is need for extensive survey of the region and collection of all the
germplasm available in the region for bioprospecting which in turn help in the search for
previously unknown compounds in organisms that have never been used. These germplasm
should be utilized in strategic breeding programme involving high yielding national/exotic
varieties to make it more resilient to biotic-abiotic stress and economical profitable. Shifting
cultivation can be improved to obtain higher production, economic returns and check
deteriorative in soil fertility by growing pineapple, turmeric, ginger, chillis, rice, maize,
sesame and cotton across the slope in the centre
In a nut shell to ensure sustainable maintenance of the environment and productivity of
Jhum cultivation some suggestions are pertinent:
1. Introducing of Alder trees (Alnus nepalenis).
2. Encouraged settled cultivation.
3. Topography of the district is undulating, use of broom grass on contours as vegetative
barriers to reduce soil erosion.
4. Use of salt to control weeds must be banned as it loosens the soil which leads to soil
erosion.
5. Introduction of leguminous crops in Jhum fields during cropping years to enhance land
productivity and crop yields.
6. Afforestation must be encouraged under the guidance of village councils, district
authorities along with forest department, NGO’s and other agencies.
7. Organic farming must be encouraged.
8. Balanced use of fertilizer to maintain soil fertility.
Introduction
Shifting cultivation or Jhum is a traditional landuse system cultivated predominantly in
North Eastern Hill region. Our neighbouring countries like Bangladesh, Myanmar, Nepal and
Bhutan have various nomenclature for this practice. In Bangladesh, it is called as ‘Jhum’,
'taungya’ or hill crop land in Myanmar, ‘khoriya’ and ‘basme’ in Nepal, "tseri" in lower
elevation and "phangzing" in higher elevation in Bhutan (Kherkhoff and Sharma, 2006). In
India, this cultivation is practiced predominantly by the tribals of NEI and in some parts of
Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Karnataka. In India, the different tribes call
shifting cultivation by different names. It is called as Jhum by Naga, penda by Maria of
bastar, podu by Khond, and bewar by Baiga (Saraogi, 2013). Shifting cultivation was
classified into four types: traditional, distorted, innovated and modified (Tiwari, 2005). The
traditional shifting cultivation is mostly found in villages which have not experienced much
pressure of population increase. The distorted shifting cultivation is the result of population
increase, reduced fallow period and cultivation in steep slopes. The innovated shifting
cultivation is the outcome of switching to newer methods of cultivation by traditional
shifting cultivators. Modified shifting agriculture was introduced during the past decade
with implementation of two developmental projects in shifting cultivation area. One is
Nagaland Environmental Protection and Economic Development (NEPED) and another is
North East Region Community Resource and Management Project (NERCORMP) which have
been instrumental in developing Jhum farmers with microfinance and human resource
development activities in Meghalaya, Manipur and hill districts of Assam.
Status on statistics of Jhum
"The actual number of shifting cultivators in South East Asia varies between 14 and 34
million" (Mertz et al., 2009). "There were 5 million tribal families in India who are involved
in shifting cultivation on 4.37 million hectares of land "(Sahu et al., 2005). The total
estimated area under the shifting cultivation in India is 0.9 million ha which includes both
current Jhum (53%) and abandon Jhum (47%). The North Eastern Region (NER) occupies 83
per cent of the total shifting cultivation in India (GoI, 2011). Of the total schedule tribe rural
population of Manipur, Jhumias contribute 36.46 per cent (GoM, 2015). Hence, there are
sizable number of people who depend on Jhum for their livelihood in Manipur. Adding to
the above, among the NEI, compared to 2005-06, the reduction of current Jhum was
observed during 2008-09 (GoI, 2011). The reduction is higher (64%) in Manipur followed by
Tripura (62%), Assam (61%), Mizoram (40.42%), Nagaland (22%), Meghalaya (6.62%) and
Arunachal Pradesh (6.24%) calculated based on the data of Wasteland Atlas of India. The
reasons of reductions might be due to shifting cultivators dependence on other sources of
livelihood. The area of shifting cultivation in Manipur for the year 2014-15 was reported as
1,35,000 ha whereas, the shifting cultivation area in the wasteland atlas for the year 2005-
06 is 85,220 ha and 2008-09 is 47,163 ha and Jhum area for the year 2017 reported by
Manipur Remote Sensing Application centre (MARSAC) found to be 1,22,147 ha (Table 1).
Table 2. Distribution of Shifting Cultivation Area in Manipur
Shifting Cultivation
S.N. Districts
Current Jhum (Ha) Current Jhum (Ha)
1. Senapati 4714.77 27611.40
2. Tamenglong 5736.02 14826.09
3. Ukhrul 5342.50 13384.89
4. Chandel 6354.90 25630.90
5. Churachandpur 10091.55 8454.40
TOTAL 32239.74 89907.68
It is stated that, “Country by country analysis shows that both area under swidden and the
number of people dependent on swidden are largely unknown and the data from each
country are highly variable.” (Mertz et al., 2009). Similarly, the above data of wasteland
atlas gives a decreasing trend whereas, the data of Department of Agriculture shows
increasing trend in shifting cultivation area. Hence, the data of the national remote sensing
centre and the data portrayed by the Department of Agriculture, Manipur is highly variable.
The above data set describes that there is a need to have proper documentation for the
shifting cultivation area and the Jhumias population in India and NEI in particular. The
number of households and the population who are dependent on Jhum in Manipur are
described in Table 2. The above observation was supported by the document which
portrayed that database on shifting cultivation area need to be updated (NAAS, 2016).
Table 2. Distribution of households depending on Jhum in Manipur
S.N. District Household (No.) Population (No.)
1. Churachandpur 25830 99185 (34.37)
2. Ukhrul 23972 47857 (16.58)
3. Chandel 15870 30450 (10.55)
4. Tamenglong 27858 83574 (29.02)
5. Senapati 9150 27450 (9.51)
Total 1,02,680 2,88,516 (100)
Note : Figure in the parenthesis are per cent to total Jhum population in the state
Characteristics of Jhum
The shifting cultivation practice invariably involves slashing of woody vegetation, burning,
clearing including debris followed by cultivation of crops and sowing of various crops in
which upland paddy was the predominant crop (Bhattacharjee, 2016). Both private and
common property tenure found in the shifting cultivation system. The practice varies from
place to place. However, the selection of Jhum block starts in the month of January. In the
Khasom Khullen block, the Jhum land is hereditary. Felling of trees takes place in the month
of last week of January to February. The villagers celebrate the festival called as "Ramtho
Phanit" local Thangkhul dialect. "Ram" means land, "tho" means starting and "Phanit"
means festival. The drying of felled trees will take place from February and March and then
at the end of march and April, a day is fixed for burning of felled trees. The dibbling of rice
and other crops takes place from last week of April to first week of June. This is followed by
first weeding and second weeding of the crop. The harvesting of rice takes place in the
month of October. The harvesting is accompanied with festival celebrating and enjoying
with the community members.
Schemes in shifting cultivation area
Since 1994-95, Watershed Development Project in Shifting Cultivation Area (WDPSCA) was
implemented in all the North East India. The WDPSCA scheme was purely a central
government sponsored scheme implemented by Government of India since 1stapril 1995 to
31st march 2012. The Department of Horticulture and Soil conservation were the nodal
department for implementation of the scheme. The main aim of the scheme was to develop
the Jhum areas on watershed basis and to improve the socio economic condition of the
Jhumias. The eligibility criteria for implementation of the scheme were as follows. A
minimum of 25 per cent of watershed area is under shifting cultivation; more than 50
percent of the population is dependent on shifting cultivation as a means of livelihood; the
willingness of Jhumias to opt for improvement of Jhum. The scheme was implemented on
watershed basis with a cost of H 12,000 per ha in plain areas and H 15,000 per ha in difficult
and hilly areas. The common guidelines for watershed development projects (GoI, 2015)
included were ridge area treatment, drainage line treatment with a combination of
vegetative and engineering structures, development of water harvesting structures such as
low cost farm ponds, check dams, percolation tanks, nursery raising for fodder, fuel, timber
and horticultural species with special emphasis on local importance, land development
including in-situ soil and moisture conservation, bench terracing, contour bunding, crop
demonstrations for popularising new crops and varieties, pasture development, sericulture,
bee keeping, backyard poultry, small ruminant, other livestocks and micro-enterprises,
fisheries development and promotion and propagation of energy saving devices, bio-fuel
plantations etc. After 2012, this scheme were merged under Rastriya Krishi Vikas Yojana.
Determinants and livelihood of Jhum
The causes of continuance of shifting cultivation was studied by Rahman et al. (2011) who
stated that older and non educated farmers due to their tradition have the tendency to
practice shifting cultivation. Large family size and lack of opportunities of off-farm earnings
significantly increase the farmers’ possibility to opt for shifting cultivation. The younger
farmer with small household size decreases the probability to practice shifting cultivation.
The farmers practice shifting cultivation as it gives relatively stable net cash flow each year.
Further his logistic regression analysis reveals that, tradition and custom, still play a decisive
role for the continuance of shifting cultivation. Gupta (1994) studied Jhumias of Tripura,
which revealed that 50.47 per cent of the Jhumias households continue Jhum as a way of
life. While inadequacy of government assistance for giving up the practice was reported by
73.77 per cent, 60.46 per cent of the Jhumias were expressive of the need to find a
supplementary source of income if the practice of Jhum had to be given up.
Tripura and Chand (2015) did a case study in a Tripura Jhumia community. He observed that
tribes of Tripura had occupational change over the recent years. The study revealed that, of
the primary occupation, 50 per cent Jhumias pursue occupation as wage laborers followed
by 31 per cent in bari agriculture, 10 per cent in government job, 2 per cent in weaving,
Jhuming, business and herding. He further opined that earlier whole community undertake
Jhum as a livelihood option but now Jhum as a secondary occupation occupy only 12 per
cent. Education, shortage of family labour, less availability of forest product and shortage of
food grain made their occupational change of Jhum only to other sources of livelihood.
Datta et al. (2014) studied the perception of Tripura Jhumias on the livelihood status. It
revealed the following findings. 54.29 per cent of farmers perceive that returns from selling
Jhum products gives satisfactory income, 72.86 per cent satisfied that livestock provide
guaranteed additional income.100 per cent of Jhumias were highly satisfied on the access
and benefits from common property resources, 82.14 per cent were less satisfied with the
returns from forest and NTFP, 52.85 per cent and 47 per cent were less satisfied and
satisfied respectively for the family members that they were engaged in Jhuming and
livestock rearing occupation and 100 per cent of the Jhumias were highly satisfied by the
quality of labour available at household level. More than 80 per cent of Jhumias were highly
satisfied on the ability to call friends on crisis situation and the assurance of community
support during crisis situation. 72.86 per cent of the respondents were less satisfied with
the stock of money or savings they own.
Socio-economic condition of Jhumias
The study by Punitha et al., ( 2016 ) in Jhumias of Manipur revealed that 71 percentage of
Jhumias family members had completed matriculation. It was also found that, 48
percentage of Jhumias household had completed higher secondary and above level. Further
study in Jhumias of Tripura revealed that education was found to be positively and
significantly related with livelihood status of tribal people. The family size was found to be
averaging 6.7 and the standard deviation was 2.14. It was found that 71.72 percentage of
the respondents found to belong to the category of 5-7 number of family size. Similar
findings with an average family size of 7 were found reported in the study in Ri bhoi district
in Meghalaya (Deb et al., 2013). The mean Jhum experience of the respondents were 21
years with a standard deviation of 11 years. The variable exposure to number of mass media
revealed that 77 percentage of the respondents had access to two to three sources of mass
media. Further, it was found that 84 percentage of the respondents had no access to any
form of extension contact. Another 16 percentage of the respondents had extension contact
because of the access to Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) near to the village at Tamenglong and
also because of the intervention through North East Regional Community Resource
Management Project (NERCORMP) staffs through International Fund for Agricultural
Development assistance at Ukhrul and Senapati districts. It was found that 71 percentage of
16 ICAR RESEARCH COMPLEX FOR NEH REGION, UMIAM, MEGHALAYA
JHUM IMPROVEMENT FOR SUSTAINING FARM LIVELIHOOD AND NATURAL RESOURCE
CONSERVATION IN NORTH EASTERN HILL REGION : VISTAS AND FRONTIERS
the respondents family members had not migrated either within or outside the state.
Hence, most of them were pursuing Jhum as a livelihood. 29 percentage of the respondents’
family members had migrated within the state for education and employment purpose. 91
percentage of the respondents received power supply in their villages. It is increasingly said
that Jhumias were giving pressure to their land and the fallow period were getting reduced
day by day (Arunachalam, 2002). Interestingly in the study area of Manipur, the average
fallow period was 10.7 years.
Intervention under Jhum farming
Inclusion of pulses in shifting cultivation: The continuance of Jhum in the state is closely
linked to ecological, socio-economic, cultural and land tenure systems of tribal communities.
Since the community owns the lands the village council or elders divide the Jhum land
among families for their subsistence on a rotational basis. The dry broadcast or ‘punghul’
method involves sowing in the month of March/April and harvesting in August/September.
Wet sowing or ‘pamphel’ is done in the month of May/June and harvested during
October/November. Transplanted paddy or ‘aringba’ is also sown in the month of May/June
and harvested in the month of October/November. In the hilly areas of Manipur, shifting
cultivation is widely practiced, with settled terrace farming in foothill or low slope areas,
above the adjacent rivers and streams. Depending on the slope, wet broadcast on bunded
fields or dry broadcast on unbunded fields is practiced.
The technology demonstrated like Pigeonpea (UPAS-120), Ricebean (Local), Rajma (Chitra)-
Potato, Ricebean (Local), Rajma (Chitra)- Potato, Rajma (Chitra)- Pea (Rachna), Ricebean
(Local)-Pea (Azad pea), Groundnut (ICGS-76)-Lentil (HUL-57). The farmers produced 1.2 to
1.76 tonnes of pigeonpea/ha, 1.3 to 1.7 tonnes ricebean/ha, 1.4 to 1.9 tonnes Rajma/ha, 1.4
to 1.8 tonnes pea/ha and 0.85 tonne lentil/ha. They have earned net returns varied from.
The beneficiaries especially from Jhum cultivated areas received net returns of Rs 56000 to
105000/ha, where, rice mixed farming is dominant with low productivity (0.5 to 0.9 ha-1)
and less economical (Ansari et al. 2017).
Figure 1. Diversified the rice mixed farming with legumes and pulses at
Haochong Village, Tamenglong District, Manipur
When considering economic returns, the legumes can be a valuable alternative crop for
replacing rice from Jhum areas. Besides that, pulses crop fixed the atmospheric nitrogen in
soil, improved the soil health, and reduced the soil loss, conserve the soil and water and
suppress the weed growth through smothering effects. Pulses production in hill agriculture
plays a significant role in nutritional security and used for various purposes and as well as
for second cycle produce in livestock farming. There is tremendous opportunity to enhance
pulses production especially in Jhum areas, where farmers are growing crops in mixed
cropping on rotational basis. There are some potential pulses for Jhum areas are pigeonpea,
ricebean, soybean, mungbean/urdbean, broadbean, Makhyatmubi, winged bean, cowpea,
lima bean and tree bean either as sole cropping or intercropping or agro forestry system.
Conclusion
The statistics of Jhum population is highly variable. Hence suitable strategy has to be find
out the exact population who are depending on Jhum. For that, inserting a question " are
you depending on Jhum " in the census will be a more appropriate strategy. Short Message
Service (SMS) should be sent to farmers in advance related to agricultural and allied
activities which will create awareness on training programme and make Jhumias more
informed. The KVK in each district should be motivated to collect few contact numbers of
village head man and other Jhum farmers in each village. These contact numbers should be
utilised by KVK to disseminate training schedule through SMS so that interested farmers
could attend training either in KVK of the respective districts or at ICAR or Central
Agricultural university at Imphal conducted time to time on various agriculture, horticulture
and allied activities. To maintain statusquo of fallow period and to reduce the dependency
on Jhum, location specific suitable livelihood activities should be promoted so that
dependency on Jhum would be reduced in the future. Further, diversification of the rice
mixed farming with legumes and pulses has to promoted among the Jhumias for Jhum
improvement. Social participation by the Jhumia households was found to be less in the
study area due to non existence of social groups like Self Help Groups. Notably, NERCORMP
through International Fund for Agricultural Development is promoting Natural Resource
Management Group (NRMG) in Ukhrul and Senapati districts of Manipur. The policy makers
while thinking about Jhumias and Jhum should take into consideration the socio-cultural
aspects before intervention in Jhum and their livelihood.
References
Ansari M A, Saraswat P K, Sharma SK, Prakash N, Meitei Ch. Bungbungcha, Monsang TS
Leenda, Singh N. Ajitkumar, Singh L. Somendro, Singh Deepak, Lal N,
Ramakrishna Y, Das Anup, Hazarika S and Ngachan SV (2017). Changing from
subsistence to remunerative cropping: A success story of diversification through
legume in Jhum land. (In) Book of Abstract of National Seminar on Smart
Farmin g for Enhancing Input Use efficiency, Income and Environmental Security
(SFEIES) during September. 19-21st, 2017 at ICAR RC for NEH Region, Umiam,
Meghalaya. Pp: 160.
Arunachalam, A. (2002). Dynamics of soil nutrients and microbial biomass during first year
cropping in an 8-year jhum cycle. [Link]. Agro-ecosyst., 64: 283-291.
Bhattacharjee, S. (2016). A micro-level study on dimensions of emerging livelihood pattern
of rural tribal youth in Tripura. Ph.D thesis. Submitted to School of Social Sciences,
College of Post Graduate Studies, Central Agricultural University, Umiam,
Meghalaya.
Deb, S., Lynrah, M.M., and Tiwari, B.K. (2013).Technological innovations in shifting
agricultural practices by three tribal farming communities of Meghalaya, North
East India. [Link]., 54(2): 133-148.
GoI. (2011). Wasteland Atlas of India. Department of land resources. National Remote
Sensing Centre. http//:[Link]..in/dolr/wasteland_atlas.asp. Accessed 31
March 2015.
GoM. (2015). District wise number of jhumia household and number of population engaged
in jhuming cultivation. Department of [Link] of Manipur, Imphal.
Kherkhoff, E. and Sharma, E. (2006). Debating shifting cultivation in the Eastern Himalayas
farmers’ innovations as lessons for policy. International Centre for Integrated
Mountain Development. [Link] Accessed 13
February 2015.
Mertz, O., Padoch, C., Fox, J., Cramb, R.A., Leitsz, S.J., Lam, N.T., and Vien, T.D. (2009).
Swidden change in South East Asia: understanding causes and consequences. Hum.
Ecol., doi 10.1007/s10745-009-9245-2.
NAAS.(2016). Policy paper No.83 issues and challenges in shifting cultivation and its
relevance in the present context. National Academy of Agricultural Sciences. New
Delhi. [Link] Accessed 3 March, 2017.
NAAS.(2016). Policy paper No.83 issues and challenges in shifting cultivation and its
relevance in the present context. National Academy of Agricultural Sciences. New
Delhi. [Link] Accessed 3 March, 2017.
Punitha, P., Pandey, D.K., Feroze, S.M., Singh, R.J., Ram, D., Singh, N.O., Jyothi, S.S.P. and
Monika, A. 2016. Socio-economic profile and perceived livelihood diversification
choice of Jhumias of Manipur in North East India. Progressive Research- An
international Journal. 11 (VI):4314-4319.
Sahu, S.K., Nayak, R.K., and Sarangi, D. (2005). Sustainable soil and land management under
shifting cultivation in Orissa. [Link] review/
jan2005/.../Sustainable_soil.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2015.
Saorogi, A.(2013). Shifting cultivation in India. http:/ /www. important india. com/9442/
shifting-cultivation-in-india/. Accessed 23 September 2016.
Tiwari, B.K.(2005). Shifting agriculture in North Eastern India: some insights in
spatiotemporal patterns and processes. Proceedings of workshop on shifting
agriculture, environmental conservation and sustainable livelihoods of marginal
mountain societies, October 6-10, 2005, Guwhathi, India.
Introduction
Shifting cultivation or slash and burn agriculture locally known as “jhuming” is a widely
practiced farming system in the hills of North Eastern India consisting of Assam, Tripura,
Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Nagaland, Manipur and Mizoram. It has been
estimated that about 500 million peoples practice shifting cultivation in 410 m ha area
(forest land) in the world. In Asia alone, about 80 m people spread over nearly 120 m ha are
involved in shifting cultivation (Haokip, 2003). The shifting cultivation is a time-tested
system of agricultural practice, most often evolved indigenously and strongly based on
traditional knowledge. It is considered to be an appropriate and sustainable land use
practice in diverse socio-economic setup, where the dependent human population was
within the carrying capacity of a 10-15 year jhum cycle. Today the shifting cultivation
became unsustainable due to reduced jhum cycle of 3-6 years owing to the increase in
population that led to increase in food demand. Because of reduced jhum cycle at present
the average jhum land per family is about 1.3 ha while the jhum cycle is of four years
(Anonymous, 1987). This has caused decrease in productivity necessitated in bringing more
virgin forest area under jhuming.
It’s a tribe specific cultivation practice and varies widely in different parts of North East
India. The system involves cultivation of crops in steep slopes. Land is cleared by cutting of
forests, bushes, etc up to the stump level in December – January, leaving the cut materials
for drying and finally burning to make the land ready for sowing of seeds of different crops
before the onset of rains. The cultivation is confined to a village boundary and often after
two or three years the cultivated area is abandoned and a new site is selected to repeat the
process. The hutments of the village remain at the same place. Earlier whole village used to
shift to the new site. After 2 – 3 years of cropping when the land losses its fertility farmers
shift to another piece of virgin forestland for cultivation. After 3 – 15 years, when the
vegetation in deserted land regenerates during fallow period, the farmer again come back
for farming to the same piece of land, which he left fallow a few years back. Thus, the cycle
of cropping and fallow continues. With rising population, the jhum cycle in most areas,
which used to be 10 – 15 years earlier, now reducing to 2 – 3 years only. In this system,
generally all the agricultural operations are performed manually, using only a few traditional
and primitive tools. Regeneration of forest and soil fertility within farming system are also
achieved cost-free and effortlessly. Munda et al. (1996) described some common features of
shifting cultivation as follows:
Done for food items (rice, maize, yam, tapioca, ginger, sesame etc)
20 ICAR RESEARCH COMPLEX FOR NEH REGION, UMIAM, MEGHALAYA
JHUM IMPROVEMENT FOR SUSTAINING FARM LIVELIHOOD AND NATURAL RESOURCE
CONSERVATION IN NORTH EASTERN HILL REGION : VISTAS AND FRONTIERS
Resource degradation, low productivity, tendency to encourage large family size and little or
practically no scope for adoption of modern agricultural technology are some of the
drawbacks in this system (Christanty, 1986).
Earlier it was agreed at one point that shifting cultivation being a way of life had become
integral part of the socio-cultural system of the tribal people and it should be disturbed as
minimum as possible. The Indian Council of Agricultural Research has established an
Agricultural Research Complex for North Eastern Hills Region at Shillong, Meghalaya with
the subsequent set up of its centers in the states of Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram,
Nagaland, Sikkim and Tripura, with the major objective to study the shifting cultivation
systems in details and to suggest viable and socially acceptable alternatives to
replace/improve the age old practice. Since then various concepts have been developed
which have brought a number of interesting facts.
According to the estimates by the various agencies, shifting cultivation in North Eastern
States varies between 2.80 – 7.40 million hectare. According to task force on the shifting
cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture 1983, the area under shifting cultivation is estimated at
3.869 square km and number of families that depends on shifting cultivation for their
livelihood is estimated at 4,43,3361. According to Waste Land Atlas of India (2010), the area
under shifting cultivation in NE India is about 0.76 m ha. It is not only the source of
livelihood but also has high cultural importance among the people of the North East.
According to a survey of Government of Meghalaya, the average jhum area cultivated per
family for both clean felling and Bun cultivation had been estimated at 0.8 hectares. The
extent of such cultivation is maximum in Nagaland, accounting for 38.18% of its
geographical area, followed by Mizoram and Manipur. Ethnic groups practicing shifting
cultivation in different parts of the country has been indicated by Mahapatra (1983).
Problems related to shifting cultivation
Haokip (2003) outlined the basic problems related to shifting cultivation as –
Lack of basic information
Ineffective implementing machinery
Lack of proper monitoring system
Complex land tenure system (Farmers has no legal right /ownership over his land)
Lack of transport and marketing infrastructure
Lack of improved varieties of crops and livestocks
Lack of scope for appropriate modern technology due to poor technical and financial
backup. Illiteracy/ignorance of jhumias for any change from traditional jhuming to
scientifically sound technologies.
Increasing population reduced jhum cycle to less than 5 years
Lack of coordination among the implementing agencies.
Shifting cultivation was thought to be good for the time when it emerged. Least disturbance
to soil, mixed cropping on slopes under purely rainfed conditions and dependence on local
resources were some of its merits. But with passes of time the pressure on land increases
and the progressive degradation of the product base has become prominent today. Munda
et. al., (1996) stated that shifting cultivation causes mass scale destruction of forests
resources, degradation of lands, losses of valuable flora and fauna and animal resources
besides creation of ecological environment non-conducive for crop production. In this
section various adverse effects of shifting cultivation is discussed.
In fact unsustainability of shifting cultivation begins with the reduction in jhuming cycle,
accelerating both on- and off-site degradation due to erosion, runoff, nutrient losses, loss of
biodiversity and deterioration in watershed hydrology. Ill effects of jhum on the
environment are well-established facts. Such conclusions are based on the scientific data
and experiments conducted world-wide including north-east India (Ghosh et al. 2009).
Sharma (1998), stated that shifting cultivation played a major role in the rapid deforestation
in the region.
Extent of soil erosion and nutrient loss due to shifting cultivation
Soil erosion under shifting cultivation is highly erratic from year to year depending on
rainfall characteristics. Studies on steep slopes (44 - 53 %) have indicated the soil loss to the
tune of 40.9 tons per hectare and the corresponding nutrient losses per hectare are 702.9
kg of organic carbon, 145.5 kg of P2O5 and 7.1 kg of K2O (Munna Ram and Singh, 1993). The
soil loss from hill slopes (60 – 79 %) under first year, second year and abandoned jhum was
estimated to be 147, 170 and 30 t/ha/year (Singh and Singh, 1981). During first few years of
clearing, carbon and nitrogen levels decrease rapidly. According to one estimate annual loss
of topsoil, N, P and K due to shifting cultivation is 88346, 10669, 0.372 and 6051 thousand
tones in the region (Sharma, 1998). Consequently the total production from this cultivation
is pitifully low: the per hectare paddy yield in Khasi hills (Meghalaya), Garo hills (Meghalaya),
Khonsa (Arunachal Pradesh), Siang (Arunachal Pradesh) are reported to be 0.13, 0.5.0, 0.4.1
and 0.83 t/ha respectively. The serious adverse effect of jhuming is soil erosion, which is
mainly of splash and wash types. As the soil in the upper reaches in a ridge are exhausted in
the process, the cultivator’s move to the adjoining lower elevation. The process continues
till the entire ridge is exhausted. Singh et. al., (1996), reported nutrient loss to the tune of
6.0 million tons of organic carbon, 9.7 tons of available phosphorus and 5690 tons of potash
from the NEH region. Nutrient losses from the jhum field through runoff and percolation are
rather heavy during cropping. The data for N, P and K loss are given in Table.1, for a low
elevation system (Toky and Ramakrishnan, 1981a). Similar conclusions apply to the high
elevation jhum too (Mishra and Ramakrishnan, 1983a).
Table 1. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium losses (kg/ha/year) through runoff under
different jhum cycles at lower elevation and in fallows.
Runoff losses Infiltration losses
Site
NO3 -N PO4 –P K NO3 -N PO4 -P K
5 year jhum cycle 5.3 0.9 51.0 9.2 0.1 13.7
10 year jhum cycle 4.2 1.3 91.2 10.7 0.1 21.2
30 year jhum cycle 3.7 1.1 64.7 9.8 0.1 15.1
Singh and Singh, 1981, described the magnitude of soil loss associated with different
practices of shifting cultivation and established a comprehensive soil erosion calendar of
shifting cultivation. Although from bun cultivation of several crops have been obtained, yet
it leads to a larger amount of soil erosion. It was observed that for every one tone of potato
produced by the system, the soil loss was 2 tones (Singh and Singh, 1981). It has been
observed that as the time advances the horizontal spacing between the two beds goes on
increasing due to loss of soil and the land is abandoned when soil is almost exhausted and
even green grasses fail to grow some time exposing the bed rocks (Borthakur, 1992).
Cultivation of tuber and rhizomatous crops cause soil erosion to the tune of 40 – 50 t/ha
while pineapple cultivation along slopes eroded 24 to 62.6 t/ha/yr (Singh and Singh, 1981).
The entire area in and around shillong (Shillong plateau), Meghalaya is denuded by this
system of jhum cultivation.
Strategy for Sustainable Development/Alternatives of Shifting Cultivation Areas with
respect to Meghalaya
Sustainable agriculture in respect of North East region should entail development of
managements systems that ensure adequate supply of food, fibre and fuel to the growing
population. These systems must simultaneously ensure improving living standard of people
by efficient utilization of all natural resources including land and water and external inputs
in a practical and profitable manner while enhancing the environmental safety.
The concept of development of sustainable agriculture take cognizance of the geophysical
and environmental factors, which greatly govern and regulate the agricultural pattern to be
adopted in situations abound with above factors. The characteristic geophysical and
environmental factors prevalent in North Eastern region can be enumerated as below:
1. The undulating topography
2. The wide range of altitude
3. Varying rainfall and climates, as well as low temperature during winter season.
4. The need of specific land use and soil conservation measures depending on the slopes of
the hills.
5. Water availability, water harvesting and retention, favourable soil and water balance, soil
erosion, hydrological behaviour of watershed and finally the ecology and environment all
dependent on forest cover and the degree of deforestation (Singh et. al. 1996).
In midst of all these above features of the North East India promise for potential
development of agriculture including, horticulture, fishery, forestry, animal husbandry etc.
The present agricultural activities in this region are not exposed by adequate scientific base
in circumventing the land degradation process and scientific exploitation of water resources.
There is, therefore, an urgent need to develop sustainable agricultural strategy for hill areas
of North Eastern hill region to conserve soil, water and ecology while carrying out various
agricultural practices. Various scientific studies and approaches suggest that mixed land use
systems are better in the hilly areas, from the conservation as well as production point of
view. Further, the system should be so designed so as to meet the various needs effective
for lean season. Important grasses for the purpose are Chrysopogon fulvus, Chloris gyana,
Dichanthium annulatum, Panicum antidolate, Setaria anceps, Sehima nervosum; legumes
are Atylosia scarabaeoides, Macroptilium atropurpureum, Slylosanthes gracilis, Glycine
javanica and important tree and shrub species are Albizia chinensis, Albizia lebbek, Albizia
procera, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Sesbania grandiflora, Sesbania sesban for humid topics
and for temperate and sub temperate areas, suitable trees and shrubs atre Betula alboides,
Celtis australis, Morus serrata, Robinia pseudoacacia etc., and grasses and legumes are
Bromus inermis, Dactylis glomerata, Poa pratensis, lespedeza ceraces, Lupinus augustifolis,
Trifolium incernatum, Trifolium prantensis, Trifolium incernatum, Trifolium response (Singh
and Srivastava, 1990). Selection of leguminous and non-leguminous annuals and perennials,
shrubs and trees will depend on the type of enterprises. Carrying capacity of such high land
use has been estimated to be 4 to 5 livestock/unit/ha with setaria and stylo (1:1) mixture of
fodder production. This system has potential for substantial income (1:1.78) from the
farmyard manure and self-sufficiency in fuel production through biogas plant. About 90 % of
annual rainfall could be retained in the watershed and soil loss was restricted to 2 t/ha/year
(Verma et. al., 2001).
A land use model for resource conservation in sloping land
A land use model (0.53 ha, 30-40% slope) involving natural forest, fodder crops, leguminous
cover crops, intercropping of maize + legume, residue management, conservation tillage,
micro rain water harvesting structure (5 x 4 x 1.5 m3) etc. were implemented for climate
resilient agriculture in hills. Hedge rows (Tephrosia sp.) in alternate terrace risers and toe
tranches (25 cm x 15 cm) in the inner side of terraces were made for collecting run-off and
increase infiltration. After harvest of kharif crops, the residues were retained on the surface
and toria, French bean and lentil were grown under no-till (NT) with residual moisture. The
cropping sequence followed beginning with the top to bottom hill slopes were natural pine
forest with catch pits - fodder crops - cover crops - maize + legume intercropping - rice
based system at the foot hills. The highest fodder and legume (cover crop) grain yields were
recorded with guinea grass (91.5 t/ha) and groundnut (2.5 t/ha), respectively. Among
different maize + legume intercropping systems, maize + groundnut system recorded the
highest maize equivalent yield (5.6 t/ha). The rice crop under minimum tillage and NT
recorded similar but higher yield than conventional tillage. Residue retention and NT
resulted about 10% higher soil moisture stock in dry season frenchbean crop compared to
residue removal and conventional tillage (CT). The productivity of succeeding French
bean/rapeseed crop after legume/maize + legume intercropping system under NT and
residue retention were significantly higher compared to farmer’s practice of residue
removal/CT. Among the different cropping systems, fodder crop based system recorded
maximum soil organic carbon (1.80 %) and SOC stock (29.7 t/ha) followed by cover crop
based system (1.61%, 26.8 t/ha) at the end of three cropping cycles in 0-15 cm soil depth.
On an average, the above model enhanced SOC stock by 10% and reduced soil loss
substantially over farmers’ practice (Das et al., 2017).
compared to rice at lower elevations has led to a manifold increase in economic yield
despite low fertility of the strong acid soils at higher elevations.
jhum cycle should be a minimum of ten years (this cycle length was found critical for
sustainability when jhum was evaluated using money, energy, soil fertility biomass
productivity, biodiversity and water quality as currencies) by greater emphasis on other
land use system such as the traditional valley cultivation or home gardens.
Where the jhum cycle length cannot be increased beyond the five-year period that is a
great concern in the region, re-design and strengthen the agroforestry system
incorporating ecological insights on tree architecture (e.g. the canopy form of trees
should be compatible with crop species at ground level so as to permit sufficient light
penetration and provide fast recycling of nutrients through fast leaf turnover rates. Local
perceptions are extremely important in tree selection for introduction into the cropping
and fallow phases of jhum, as can be seen in a major initiative in the state of Nagaland in
north-east India.
Improvement in nitrogen economy of jhum at the cropping and fallow phases by
introducing nitrogen-fixing legumes and non-legumes. A species such as the Nepalese
alder (Alnus nepalensis) is readily incorporated because it is based on the principal of
adaptation o traditional knowledge to meet modern needs. Another such example is the
lesser known food crop legume Flemingia vestita, traditionally used by tribes as an
important species when jhum cycles decline below five years.
Making use of some of the important bamboo species, highly valued by tribes, which can
concentrate and conserve important nutrient elements such as N, P, and K. They could
also be used as wind breaks to check wind-blown loss of ash and nutrient losses in
water.
Speeding up the fallow regeneration after jhum by introducing fast growing native
shrubs and trees.
Condensing the time-span of forest succession and acceleration restoration of degraded
land based on an understanding of tree growth strategies and architecture, by adjusting
the species mix in time and space.
Improvement of animal husbandry through improved breeds of swine and poultry and
training the tribal farmers about the improved animal husbandry developed by research
institutes.
References
Ahlgren, I.F. and Ahlgren, C. E. 1965. Effect of prescribed burning on soil microorganisms in a
Minnesota jack pine forest. Ecology. 46 : 304-310.
Anonymous, 1987. Basic statistics for North Eastern Region (Shillong – North Eastern
Council), India.
Mishra, B.K. and Ramakrishnan, P. S.1981. The economic yield and energy efficiency of hill
agro-ecosystem at higher elevations of Meghalaya in Northeastern India. Acta
Oecol./[Link].2:1369-1389.
Munda, G.C., Ngachan, S.V., Das, Anup., Satapaty K.K., Biswas, S and Malngiang, S. 2010.
Livelihood improvement through farming systems and subsidiary activities in
disadvantaged districts of North East India. NAIP bulletin no. 1. pp 46.
Munda. G.C., Ghosh, P.K and Prasad, R. N. 1996. Adopt alternative land-use systems to
shifting cultivation. Indian Farming. April: 10-14.
Munna, Ram and Singh, B.P. 1993. Soil fertility management in farming systems. Lectures
notes, off campus training on farming system. Aizawl, Mizoram, 5-7 October, PP. 46-
50.
Panwar, A.S., Ngachan, S.V., Munda, G.C., Das, Anup and Satapathy. K.K. 2007. Agro-pastoral
based farming system: a viable alternative to shifting cultivation in North East India.
Third National Symposium on Integrated Farming Systems and its role towards
Livelihood Improvement. Organized by Farming System Research and Development
Association (PDCSR), Modipuram at ARS, Durgapura, Rajasthan, 26-28 October,
pp.41-41.
Ramakrishna. P.S. 2000. An integrated approach to land use management for conserving
agroecosystem biodiversity in the context of global change. International Journal of
Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology. 1(1): 56-67.
Ramakrishnan P.S.1992. Shifting Agriculture and Sustainable Development; An
Interdisciplinary study from Nortyh-Estern India UNESCO-MAB
[Link] Publ., [Link] (Republished by Oxford University
[Link] Delhi.1993).
Ramakrishnan, P.S and Toky, O.P.1981. Soil nutrient status of hill agro-ecosystems and
recovery pattern after slash and burn agriculture (jhum) in north-eastern India. Plant
and Soil. 60 : 41-64.
Rao, N.V. 1991. Ecopnomic aspects. Annual report. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region,
Umiam-793 103, Meghalaya.
Rappaport, R. A. [Link] flow of energy in an agricultural society. Sci. Am. 225: 117-132.
Sharma, U.C. 1998. Methods of selecting suitable land use system with reference to shifting
cultivation in NEH region. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation. 26 (3): 234-238.
Singh, A. and Singh, M. D. 1978. Effect of various stages of shifting cultivation on soil erosion
from steep hill slopes. Indian Forester, 106 (2) : 115-121.
Singh, A. and Singh, M.D. 1981. Soil erosion hazards in North Eastern Hill Region. Research
Bulletin No. 10. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, India.
Singh, A.K. and Singh, S.K. [Link] management of fruit crops. Farmer and parliament.
35 (9) : 9-24.
Singh, N.P., Singh, A.K. and Patel, D.P. 2000. Shifting cultivation and its alternate approaches
towards sustainable development in North East India. Journal of North Eastern
Council, 20 (2): 24-30.
Singh, N.P., Singh, O.P. and Jamir, N.S. 1996. Sustainable agriculture development strategy
for North Eastern Hill Region of India. In Shukla, S. P. and Sharma, N. (eds) Pub.
Mittal Publication, New Delhi. PP 346-351.
Singh, Punjab and Srivastava, A.K. 1990. Forage production technology. Pub. Director IGFRI,
Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh ,India . pp. 24-30.
Smith, W. H., Bormann, F. H. and Likens, G. E. 1968. Response of chemoautrophic nitrifiers
to forest cutting. Soil Science. 106: 471-473.
Steinhard, J.S and Steinhard,[Link] use in US food system. Science. 184 : 307-316.
Toky, O.P. and Ramakrishnan, P. S. 1982. A comparative study of the energy budget of hill
agro – ecosystems with emphasis on the slash and burn system (Jhum) at lower
elevations of North Eastern India. Agric. Systems. 9 : 143-154.
Verma, N.D., Satapathy, K. K., Singh, R. K., Singh, J.L. and Dutta, K.K.2001. Shifting cultivation
and alternative farming systems.. In: Steps towards modernization of agriculture in
NEH Region. Eds. [Link] and [Link]. ICAR Research complex for NEH Region,
Umiam, Meghalaya, India. PP. 345-364
Introduction
Mizoram state is one amongst the eight sister states of NEI. A landlocked state, Mizoram is
extended between 21o 58' - 24o 35' N and 92o 15' - 93 o 29' E. It covers an area of 21087
km2. According to the Census of India 2011, total population of Mizoram was 1,091,014.
Literacy rate was noticed 91.85%. Sex ratio was registered 975 and density of population
was 52. Average altitude of the state is 1000 m. Blue Mountain is the highest point (2065
m). There are eight districts and 26 administrative blocks in the state. The term ‘Mizoram’
refers to the land of the highlanders. The mountainous part of it is nomenclature as ‘the
rolling hills’. Here, economy is based upon the production of biomass based agriculture. The
state is economically backward region. Its economy is mainly dependent on the traditionally
cultivating cereal crops. About 80% people are engaged in agricultural practices. Rice is the
main food-grain. The total consumption of rice in Mizoram is 1,80,000 MT whereas, it
produces only 44,950 MT rice (25%).
Under the traditional agriculture, shifting cultivation is dominant mainly in the highlands.
Wet rice is grown in the lowlands and the valleys. Further, most of the agricultural practices
are carried out through shifting cultivation. It is characterized by the dominance of
subsistence crops. Crops are mostly grown during the monsoon season on the gentle to
steep slopes without terracing of fields. Vegetables and fruits are also grown and consumed
domestically. Commercial uses of these crops are largely negligible. Shifting cultivation has a
tremendous impact on the socio-economy and on the environment. Being as a main source
of livelihoods of the poor rural people, it has negative impacts on the environment. It is
mainly due to clearing and burning of forests.
Status of Jhum cultivation
Out of the total geographical area (21087 km2), 75.6% area is forest cover. Total cropped
area is 5.5%. Net sown area is registered only 4.9%. Irrigated area is 0.5%. Area under
horticulture is 1.9%. Fallow land other than current fallow is 8.1% whereas current fallows
(Jhum land) is 1.9% only. Land not available for cultivation is 6.6%. Land under
miscellaneous tree-crops (not included in net sown area) is 2.5%. Cultivable waste land is
0.5%.During the past decades, 58.1% area under shifting cultivation in Mizoram has been
decreased (from 68,114 ha in 1997-98 to 28,562 ha in 2010-11). Meanwhile, the area under
wet rice cultivation has been increased by 28.4% (from 9,446 ha to 12,130 ha) in 2010-2011.
The share of shifting cultivation in net sown area was calculated about 38.64 % during the
recent past.
Mizoram enjoys with rich biodiversity. It is one amongst the mega biodiversity hotspots of
the world. Natural vegetation comprises of tropical evergreen in the lower altitudes and
semi-evergreen on the upper slopes (Champion & Seth, 1968). The average annual rainfall is
2150 mm. It occurs mostly between June and September by the southwest monsoon. The
winter (Oct-Jan) is a cool dry season with few rainy days. Summer (March-May) is largely hot
and dry with occasional thundershowers and pre-monsoon rains in April-May. Temperature
accedes to 32oC during April and May and after occurrence of monsoon rain, temperature
recedes slowly. During winter, average temperature remains 9oC. The implication of shifting
cultivation on the ecology has long been a serious concern for the agriculture scientists,
scholars, economists and anthropologist.
Deforestation caused by shifting cultivation is often viewed as one of the most important
environmental problems of Southeast Asia (FAO, 1995). In Mizoram, the studies on
ecological impact of shifting cultivation have also been carried out by Tawnenga (1990),
Tawnenga & Tripathi (1996) and Tawnenga et al., (1997). Clearing forests for shifting
cultivation can contribute to climate change, biodiversity loss, reduced timber supply,
flooding, siltation, soil degradation and change of forest vegetation from primary to
secondary and eventually to grassland (Holden, 2001). Clearing of forests and burning them
for shifting cultivation are the main reason of deforestation (Monela and Abdallah, 2007;
Zahabu, 2008).
The loss of vegetation cover increases the incidence of soil erosion. Mostly in the hilly areas,
soils are the most susceptible to erosion (Shoaib et al., 1998; Sfeir- Younis and Dragun,
1993). In Mizoram, the cycle of shifting cultivation has been reduced from 20-30 years to 3-4
years. It has accentuated soil erosion and loss of nutrients from top soil. About 16.84 metric
ton of soil/ha has been lost/year. It is therefore, the fertility of soil has been reduced. This
has resulted in low production and per ha yields of cereal crops from the shifting cultivation.
In Mizoram, 1.5 % of total area is being affected by shifting cultivation, annually (Maithani,
2005b) that costs about Rs. 1 billion forest resources loss (Lalkhana, 1985). The adverse
effects of shifting cultivation on the environment are well established scientific facts.
Biologist, foresters and conservationists have noticed the effects of shifting cultivation on
biodiversity in the tropical forests (Raman, 2000). FAO (1957) reveals that shifting
cultivation was identified long time ago as a threat to tropical forests. Many scholars believe
that shifting cultivation effects are very destructive (Rao & Hajra, 1986; Lal & Prajapathi,
1990; Tiwari, 1991; Dwivedi, 1993). These conclusions are based on the scientific data and
experiments conducted world-wide (FAO, 1984; Tawnenga et al., 1997). Air pollution due to
lashing and burning, loss of fauna and flora and other ecological implications are very
common in the areas where shifting cultivation is practiced.
Determinants of shifting cultivation
Review of literature on shifting cultivation indicates that lack of viable employment and income
earning opportunities were mostly responsible for the continuation of jhum cultivation. Lack of
infrastructure, particularly irrigation, road, communication, market and rural electrification
ICAR RESEARCH COMPLEX FOR NEH REGION, UMIAM, MEGHALAYA 35
JHUM IMPROVEMENT FOR SUSTAINING FARM LIVELIHOOD AND NATURAL RESOURCE
CONSERVATION IN NORTH EASTERN HILL REGION : VISTAS AND FRONTIERS
were other important factors. Inadequate government support and lack of suitable lands for
settled cultivation were also found to be major problems. Settled cultivation required higher
initial investment both in terms of money for purchasing land from the chief, hiring of labour
and other inputs. On the other hand, most of the jhumias were in the grip of poverty. Thus,
inadequacy of capital to invest in land improvement and generate other infrastructure on farm
came out to be the fifth most important factor. Lack of institutional support and credit in the
study area rather worsened the conditions of the jhumias, thus compelling them to attach to
the traditional jhuming system. There is no institution or agency involved in conducting
research in finding out viable alternatives to jhuming or improvement of the present system
through crop improvement, soil conservation, horticultural development, and agroforestry,
etc. The agricultural research in the region had given more attention to valley based system of
cultivation, keeping jhum cultivation in the embryonic stage of agricultural development.
Similarly, most of the training and extension programmes were oriented towards valley
agriculture and thus, did not cater to the needs of the jhumias.
INITIATIVES AND STRATEGIES FOR CONTROLLING SHIFTING CULTIVATION
1) The National Mission on Greening India has proposed different activities for
rehabilitation of shifting cultivation areas (MoEF, 2010). The major rehabilitation
activities are: (1) providing employment opportunities and income generation to the
marginal farmers who are engaged in shifting cultivation. These opportunities can be
provided through the proper utilization of land resources to control on shifting
cultivation. Various schemes of the Government under the tribal plan will have to pump
in sufficient resources for proper reclamation and development of the wasteland. Agro-
forestry practices can assist them. It helps to increase food and fodder, and protects the
existing forest where unemployed and poor people earn their livelihoods (Elevitch and
Wilkinson, 2000).
2) Prompt efforts should be made to involve the community people in carrying out forest-
based activities. It should be made commercially viable by providing proper marketing
facilities. This activity will reduce pressure on shifting cultivation practices. It will also
enhance the opportunity to community people to involve in non-timber based forest
products.
3) Degraded forestland should be protected and developed through formation of the
village forest committees. These committees can divert the farmers from shifting
cultivation. Suitable incentives should be provided to them at the time of harvesting.
4) The mountain eco-systems of NEI with shifting cultivation practices should be made
ecologically sound. Shifting cultivation can partially be replaced to farm forestry through
formulating an eco-development plan for ecological sustainability.
5) Land resource management will make shifting cultivation sustainable. Further, improve
sustainable yields, changes in technology, innovative policy and better transportation
facilities will all together contribute sustainability of shifting cultivation.
6) The forests in surrounding of a hill village are considered as ‘support area’. Forest
provides firewood, fodder, timber, water and animal bedding to the farmers. The
marginal farmers are mainly dependent on forest resources. They do not want to move
from their natural habitat.
7) Specific policies, keeping specificities of mountain niche in view, should be framed and
implemented to avoid any discrepancies in practicing shifting cultivation.
8) Terracing fields, promoting cultivation of vegetables, fruits and high value crops, and
proper use of timber and non-timber forest products may substantially contribute to
sustainable practices of shifting cultivation.
Success Stories
State Government Initiatives
NLUP (New Land Use Policy) is a flagship programme of the Government of Mizoram that
was started on the 15th of July 2010 with a budget of Rs.2873.13 crores.. The project being
a multipurpose, multi-disciplinary and multi-pronged strategy aims in reducing the number
of population depending on jhum cultivation. The overall economic impact on the
Agriculture Sector as a result of the Implementation of New Land Use Policy (NLUP) can be
briefly summarized as below: -
1) Expansion of rice cultivation areas: During the year 2010-2011 (initial stage of NLUP
implementation), the total area under Rice cultivation (WRC) was12130 hectare which
covers only 16.25% of the total Rice cultivation potential areas. The contribution of NLUP in
terms of expansion of Rice cultivation areas is about 1840.66 hectare out of the total rice
cultivation areas of 16170 hectare during 2013-2014 (whole of Mizoram) which accounts for
about 11.38% increase in Rice cultivation areas.
2) Increase in Rice Production: At the initial stage of the implementation of NLUP (2010-
2011), the total rice production in Mizoram was 47201 metric tones which increased to
58994 metric tones in 2013-14. Out of the total rice production in Mizoram i.e., 58994
metric tones (2013-2014), NLUP beneficiaries contributed 5317.10 metric tones of rice and
the total percentage of the contribution of NLUP towards the total rice production in
Mizoram state may be recorded as 9% increase from the 1st phase of implementation
alone.
3) Decrease in Jhum Areas: One of the primary objectives of NLUP is to provide sustainable
income to farming families by weaning away the destructive and unprofitable shifting
cultivation practices. The total Jhum area and the total number of Jhumia families in
Mizoram during 2010-11 are 28562 hectare and 68433 nos. respectively. As a result of the
implementation of NLUP, the total Jhum area as recorded during 2013-2014 is 22633
hectare which shows that the decrease in Jhum area for the last 4 (four) years is 5929
hectare which accunts for about 20.75 % decrease in Jhum areas. Similarly, the total
number of Jhumia families also decreased from 68433 nos. during 2010-2011 to that of
58751 nos. during 2012-2013 which accounts for about 14% decrease during the last 4(four)
years.
4) Expansion in Oil Palm cultivation areas: Out of the total geographical area of Mizoram
i.e, 21, 08,700 hectare, the total potential area for Oilpalm cultivation is recorded as 1,
01,000 hectare (as recommended by Chadha Committee and Rathinam Committee). During
the year 2010-2011, the total Oil palm cultivation area in Mizoram was only 1878 hectare
which constitutes only about 1.8% of the total Oil palm potential areas. During the year
2013-2014, the total area covered under Oil palm in Mizoram is 17588 hectare. Under NLUP,
the total number of Oil palm beneficiaries till date is 2290 nos. and the total area covered
under Oil palm is recorded as 2750 hectare. It may be concluded that out of the total area
covered under Oil palm in Mizoram i.e, 17588 hectare, the contribution of Oil palm
beneficiaries is about 2750 hectare which accounts for about 15.60% since the inception of
NLUP.
5) Improvement in Farm Mechanization Programme: Due to convergence of RKVY & MMA
with NLUP, a large number of Farm Machineries like Power Tillers, Mini Power Tillers were
distributed at subsidized rates which increase the availability of man power thus boosting
up rice production and productivity.
6) Construction of Potential Area Connectivity: Due to the convergence of NLUP with RKVY
Scheme, at present the total length of Potential Area Connectivity (PAC) already constructed
is 625 km. This will also greatly result in increase in the production of rice and other crops in
one way or the other.
ICAR Initiatives
Large scale FLD on maize was organized in eight districts of Mizoram covering an area of
534.50 ha under TSP and NICRA programme in collaboration with KVKs and District
Agriculture Offices of the respective districts. With these interventions, productivity of jhum
field increased from 1.5 ton/ha (maize equivalent yield) to 4.6 ton/ha and their net income
increased from Rs.30,400/ha to Rs. 90,000/ha by selling of maize seed.
Experiencing the grand success, the Centre has strongly recommended to the Government
of Mizoram to include HQPM maize in jhum improvement programme. Accordingly, the
Agriculture Department, Government of Mizoram is taking active role in propagating the
HQPM maize in jhum areas of the state through RKVY and NLUP scheme and every year
about 1500 ha area was brought under the variety. Three Multipurpose Feed Mills have also
been established in Theiva, New Saiha – II and Lunglei under the NAIP project during March
2014 at the cost of Rs. 10 lakh each to meet the challenges of assured market by converting
excess farm produce into quality feeds for animals.
During 2012-2015, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Mizoram Centre has adopted
5cluster villages, viz. Theiva, Baulpuii NG, Km Sawm and Niawhtlang-I & II in Saiha district
under NAIP Component III. Under this project, the centre has introduced soybean variety JS-
388 after the harvest of first crop of maize i.e. in the first week of August in jhum fields to
increase the cropping intensity and improve the livelihood of Jhumias. Critical inputs such as
quality seed, fertilizers, plant protection chemicals, etc. were provided for cultivation of
soybean in an area of 50 hectare involving 100 households. The average seed rate per ha
was 70-75 kg/ha and planted on jhum field with spacing of 45 cm x 10 cm. An average yield
of 1.48 t/ha was obtained from the harvest crop. So, by introducing soybean as 2nd crop
could earn an additional net income of Rs. 50,000 per ha with a benefit cost ratio of 2.98:1.
Realizing the success of the soybean as second crop after maize, the Government of
Mizoram has taken a strong initiative for popularization of the crop in more than 1000 ha
area during the year 2016-17 under the New Economic Development Programme. Initiatives
in post harvest and value addition also being taken up to filled up the gap between the
supply and demand.
Demonstration of Sweet Charlie variety was conducted in Km Sawm village, Saiha district
under NAIP project during August-September 2012-2014. Ten progressive farmers were
selected based on the suitability of resources. An area of 1000 sq.m was selected for each
farmer. After clearing of land, terraces of 1-1.5 meter width of convenient length were
made manually. Ridges were opened with 10-15 cm height from the base of the furrows.
Due to inherent acidity of the soil, liming at 4.5 t/ha was made before laying out of mulch
polythene. Black polythene rolls of 1m width were laid out in terraces which covered both
the ridges and furrows. Planting were done in ridges. Excess water of monsoon and water
from natural streams was collected in Jalkunds for irrigation in winter. Jalkund (40,000 liter
capacity) excavation in selected sites was completed before the onset of monsoon. Farmers
used vermin culture and organic manure through low cost vermin composting unit, which
sustained soil productivity. On an average each farmer is getting 1750 kg of strawberry and
earning a net income of Rs. 1.61 lakhs per annum. After realising the success of beneficiary
farmers, 105 terrace farmers in the area got motivated and have diverted to strawberry
cultivation in small scale. The benefit cost ratio was estimated to be 2.59. At present the
village is declared as strawberry village by the Government of Mizoram.
CONCLUSIONS
Shifting cultivation is not only the major source of livelihoods; it is a way of the life.
Socioeconomic development of the people, those are engaged in the shifting cultivation and
living in the highlands, are fully dependent on its practices to carry their livelihoods
although, per ha yield from shifting cultivation crops is not sufficient.
The high growth of population, particularly in the areas where shifting cultivation is
practiced, has put tremendous pressures on land. The extension of cropped land on the
marginal mountain niche for increasing food production has also reduced the forest and
grassland areas. Further, high soil and land degradation was due to high intensity and
frequency of shifting cultivation.
Among the various determinants of shifting cultivation, economic factors were most
dominating. Thus, diversification towards allied activities particularly dairy, piggery,
agroforestry and agro-based industries, etc. would provide regular employment and income
to the jhumias and also, reduce human pressure on jhum cultivation. Efforts to popularise
the adoption of various IFS models including high value crops particularly ginger and
soybean would help the jhumia to improve their earnings and way of living.
References
Agalawtte MB and Abeygunawardena P (1994) Conservation farming as an alternative to
shifting cultivation in Sri Lanka: An economic evaluation. Journal of Sustainable
Agriculture 4(2):65-79.
Altieri M and Anderson K (1986) An ecological basis for the development of alternative
agricultural systems for small farmers in the Third World. American Journal of
Alternative Agriculture 1(1):30-38.
Anon (1992) Agro-climatic planning for agricultural development in Meghalaya. Working
Group, Zonal Planning Team, Eastern Himalayan Region, AAU, Jorhat.
Ahsan E and Begum S (1992) Problems of sustainable agriculture: Shifting cultivation in the
hills of Bangladesh. Annals of Bangladesh Agriculture 2(1):1-12.
NEC (1994) Basic Statistics of North-East India. Publication Unit, NEC Secretariat, Shillong,
220pp.
EI Moursi AWA (1984) The role of higher agricultural education in the improvement of
shifting cultivation systems in Africa. In: Bunting AH and Bunting E, eds,The Future of
Shifting Cultivation in Africa and the Task of Universities, pp 8-14. FAO, Rome.
Christanty L (1986) Traditional Agriculture in Southeast Asia. Westview Press, Boulder,
240pp.
Ganguli BN (1979) Integrated research on shifting cultivation in Arunachal Pradesh. Indian
Journal of Agricultural Economics 4(1):55-58.
Gupta T and Sambrani S (1978) Control of shifting cultivation : The need for an integrated
approach and systematic appraisal. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 33 (4):
1-8.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (1983) Shifting Cultivation in North East India.
Publication Unit, ICAR, New Delhi, 68 pp.
Keck A, Sharma NP and Feder G (1994) Population growth, shifting cultivation and
unsustainable agriculture development: A case study in Madagascar. World Bank
Discussion Paper 234, Washington DC.
Naresh Chandra and Singh RP (1992) determinants and impact of new technology adoption
on tribal agriculture in Bihar. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 47(3):397-403.
Ramakrishnan PS (1992) Shifting Agriculture and Sustainable Development. Man and
Biosphere Series, UNESCO, Paris, 424 pp.
Roy Burman BK and Sharma PS (1970) Tribal agriculture in India. Indian Journal of
Agricultural Economics 25(3): 149-160.
Pezzey J (1989) Economic analysis of sustainable growth and development Environment
Department Working Paper 15, World Bank, Washington DC.
Bag, 2002). At the same time, shrinkage resources like arable land, water and energy, there
is a dire need to design and develop new methods and cropping pattern of crop production
to meet the increasing demand for food, feed and forage through effective utilization of
jhum lands. The state is 33% deficit in food grain production (Anon., 2014). Small Jumias are
unable to address their diversified domestic needs to sustain normal livings from their
limited land, water and economic resources. This necessitates going for appropriate
alternative and more efficient production systems such as strip cropping of cereals with
legumes which can ensure proper utilization of resources to obtain increased production
per unit area and time on a sustainable basis (Abdul Jabbar et al, 2010).
1. Land use pattern for Jhum cultivation in Nagaland
Shifting Cultivation (Jhum) is a way of life and is to stay in Nagaland. The tremendous
diversity and combination of Jhum practices followed by different tribes and sub-tribes
in state, addressing Jhum continues to remain a bigger challenge for policy makers and
natural resource managers. Owing to the emerging Action Plan for Climate Change that
discusses paradigms on Jhum at the national level that argues for its continuance based
on considerations of food security and socio-cultural institutions embedded with it, as
opposed to the dominant discourse that considers Jhum extremely detrimental to
ecology, the shift in the Jhum at the national policy level are observed. As many as 1.9
lakh families in Nagaland practiced jhum cultivation bringing 94380 ha under this
method of cultivation annually.
The continuance of jhum in the state is closely linked to ecological, socio-economic,
cultural and land tenure systems of tribal communities. Since the community owns the
lands the village council or elders divide the jhum land among families for their
subsistence on a rotational basis. In this approach , we take a close look at jhum
cultivation from the point of view of ecological sustainability and tribal livelihoods,
examine the role of agro-forestry, sericulture and horticulture as
alternatives/supplementary activities and review the current thinking on methods to
upgrade and develop jhum.
1.1: Jhum lands in NEH Region of India
Current Jhum ([Link]) Abandoned Jhum ([Link])
States
2005-6 2008-9 Change 2005-6 2008-9 Change
Ar. Pradesh 1025.07 961.04 -64.02 506.39 1078.52 572.13
Assam 160.15 258.86 98.71 79.41 136.33 56.92
Manipur 752.10 270.31 -481.79 100.10 201.32 101.22
Meghalaya 291.87 272.52 -19.35 157.12 268.11 110.99
Mizoram 1028.53 612.71 -415.82 1589.03 1049.37 -539.66
Nagaland 1239.09 1514.95 275.86 1588.65 842.47 -746.18
Tripura 89.28 33.20 -56.08 164.83 68.99 -95.84
N.E. R 4586.09 3923.59 -662.49 4185.53 3645.11 -540.42
Source: Wastelands atlas of India, 2011
Issue VIII : Land tenure system (MN & TR: 100 % by Forest Dept, NL & ML: >88 % by
Individual, AP: 74 % by Civil Authority, MZ : 44 % by Civil Authority, AS : 39 % by
Corporate Society)
Issue IX : Remoteness and Lack of market chain
3.1: Soil erosion calendar of shifting cultivation system
alternatives. The ongoing typical jhum farming operational systems viz. crops growing
period, cultivar used, seed rate, methods of sowing, weed management and yield of the
major growing jhum crops (paddy, maize, local beans, colocasia, ginger, soybean, ricebean,
cucumber, topiocca and chilli)
5. Ongoing programmes on jhum improvement
Integrated land development projects under DSCO, Govt. of Nagaland.
Integrated watershed development project under DSCO, Govt. of Nagaland.
Soil and water conservation programme under RKVY under DSCO, Govt. of Nagaland.
ICAR- projects on jhum improvement under TSP project
6. Constraints and challenges in improving the jhum cultivation system
The jhumias are well aware of the major negative environmental consequences of jhum
cultivation, but they are bound to continue jhum cultivation primarily due to their ethnic
belief of cultural heritage and secondly and more importantly due to lack of alternate
employment opportunities to sustain the family needs throughout the year (Paul et al.,
2017). Some of the tangible constraints in improving jhum cultivation are;
Traditional mindset and ongoing cultivation with low yielding varieties in a
unintelligent manner for different agriculture and horticultural crops.
Undulating topography and poor economic status.
Residue burning.
Lack of alternative livelihood options
Cultivation practice is still continuing with ineffective traditional tools and
implements.
Livestock are always considered as subsidiary income and mostly reared indigenous,
poor productive livestock with poor feeding and management system.
Lack of industry facilities, agriculture farming system is the only options of earnings
for the farmers.
Inadequate credit support. Inefficient marketing channels, lack of processing and
value addition facilities and farmers are not getting any premium prices for their
harvest though the product is like organic.
7. The identified Rehabilitation models to address Jhum cultivation:
1. SALT models (Sloping Agriculture Land Technology) / Contour Hedgerow Farming
System Technology (CHFST) (by GBPIHED)
2. SWEET (Sloping Watershed and Environmental Engineering Technology) (SFRI,
Itanagar)
3. Intensive watershed based livestock production system (ICAR)
4. ICAR 3-tier model (ICAR)
Planting materials of kiwi fruits, ramie, assam lemon, tree bean, alder, orange, litchi,
peach, etc has been distributed every year for better management of jhum fallow by
establishing orchards as sustainable venture.
To boost up the production of organic input and promotion of organic farming in jhum
areas earthworms culture and portable vermi-bag has been distributed time to time
during the training cum demonstration programes.
Good quality improved and cross breed chicks, piglets, duck, fish, and medicines of
livestock were also supplied to the jhumias to integrate with jhum farming system to
secure their livelihood.
11. Success stories of jhum improvement
Success Story-I
Livelihood Improvement of Tribal Jhumias through Integrated Farming System Approach-A
Success Story : The intervention of integrated farming system (IFS) was made at Humtso
village of Wokha district. The location of the site lies in between 26006’437” N latitude and
94012’810” E longitude and 727m above the mean sea level. The site is situated at 13 km
North-Western side of the district head quarter. The intervention was made at the field of
Mr. Atheyo Lotha; he is a youth aged 32 years from Humtso village, having 3.2 ha sloppy
land and had been practicing low productive traditional jhum farming. Mixed jhum cropping
system with locally available cultivars and poor soil and water conservation measures was
identified the main constrains for his low farm income. He was not capable to integrate
other agriculture and allied activities because of his limited scientific knowledge in modern
cultivation practices and lack of proper water storage facilities. The IFS intervention was
made with objectives; to improve the existing jhum practices through appropriate scientific
interventions, to establish a suitable agricultural farming system model through sustainable
use of natural resources and to promote integrated farming system (IFS) for enhancing
productivity, improving livelihood and for maintaining soil health.
After giving him proper training at KVK, Wokha and ICAR Nagaland centre the interventions
was made. Feasible soil and water conservation measures like terracing (Fig. 1), bunding, etc
were taken up for 1.6 ha farm areas. Plantation of MPTs and fruits trees carried out
following top to bottom system approach. Encouragement was given to adopt scientific
packages and practices for cultivation of both the kharif and rabi crops/vegetables using
improved crop varieties, to enhance crop productivity, cropping intensity and also for crop
diversity. Two numbers of ponds were managed properly to promote integrated fish cum
pig (12 nos.) and integrated fish cum duck (50 nos.) farming (Fig. 3 & 4) to obtain additional
farm income. Vanaraja chicks (100 nos.) were also introduced as a component of IFS to
meet the family egg and meat requirements. Cultivation of fodder crops like maize
(HQPM1), cassava, colocasia were promoted to supplement feeding requirements for
livestock. Emphasis was given on daily feeding of poultry and piggery by using both the
commercial as well as local available feeds. Year round mushroom was taken up as
Fig.1 Construction of terraces for SWC. Fig.2 Cultivation of winter vegetable as 2nd crop in terraces
Fig.3 Promoted integrated pig cum fish farming Fig. 4 Integrated duck cum fish farming.
Crop productivity and cropping intensity increased significantly. Intervention of fodder crops
reduced the feeding requirements by 31.6 to 44.7% for poultry and piggery. Overall
interventions of crops, livestock, fishery and secondary farming increased employment
opportunity (603 man-days) as compared to traditional jhum farming (72 man-days).
Adoption of the soil and water conservation measures and better nutrient management
practices improved soil health resulted in overall enrichment in soil organic carbon (SOC),
available nitrogen and phosphorus status. Intervention of poultry, piggery, dairy, fishery,
duckery, mushroom, vermicomposting and fruits in cropping cycle provided 6.54 times
better income than traditional jhum farming. It could be concluded that promotion of
integrated farming system (IFS) is a viable intervention for the tribal jhumias for overall
improvement in productivity, income, employment, food, nutritional and ecological security
through sustainable use of natural resources.
Success Story-II
Promotion of Artificial Rainwater Harvesting Pond Based Integrated Farming System for
Tribal Jhumias-A New Initiative : The study was undertaken at three distinct jhum
cultivating villages (yanthamo, Longsa and Riphyim) of Wokha district in Nagaland, India
(Table 2). Acute scarcity of water during post-rainy season is one of the major constraints
52 ICAR RESEARCH COMPLEX FOR NEH REGION, UMIAM, MEGHALAYA
JHUM IMPROVEMENT FOR SUSTAINING FARM LIVELIHOOD AND NATURAL RESOURCE
CONSERVATION IN NORTH EASTERN HILL REGION : VISTAS AND FRONTIERS
for intensification and diversification of agricultural activities in jhum areas for overall
livelihood improvement of the jhumias. Moreover, 78% of total rainfall concentrates during
the four months (June-Sept.) of the year, leaving no or little rain during post rainy period.
This calls for concretive efforts for massive rain water harvesting and its efficient utilization
on improving the existing jhum practices through scientific interventions (water harvesting,
crop diversifications, inclusion of animal and fishery components as well as secondary
agriculture) for overall improvement in productivity, income, employment, food, nutritional
and ecological security through sustainable use of natural resources.
Different interventions such as provisioning rainwater harvesting (8.75 lakh) structure (size;
35m x 10m x 2.5m), establishing suitable agricultural models (top to bottom approaches),
involving planting of MPTs (tree bean, alder) at top hill, planting of fruits (litchi, Assam
lemon, mandarin orange, papaya, banana) and cultivation of seasonal crops and vegetables
in middle and bottom hill. Livestock components (poultry and piggery) and fishery was
promoted along with secondary agricultural interventions of vermicomposting and
mushroom for additional farm income. The interventions were replicated in three different
jhum areas and soil tested before interventions made (Table 2).
Table 2. Interventional locations and soil characteristics.
Location Tex- Initial soil status
Sites pH SOC
Latitude Longitude Altitude (m) ture N P K
Yanthamo 26003.753' 094018.195'
973 SL SA VH L L MH
N E
0 0
Longsa 26 04.029' 094 14.936'
1174 Si L EA VH L M MH
N E
0 0
Riphyim 26 12.282‘ 094 15.748‘
536 CL EA VH L L MH
N E
SL= Sandy loam, Si L=Silty Loam, CL=Clay Loam, SA= strongly acidic, EA=Extremely acidic,
L=Low, M=Medium, VH=Very high, MH= Moderately high.
The study clearly revealed the enhancement of yield of cereal (29%), oilseed (40.7%), pulse
(15.1%), vegetable (298.4%), spice (53.6%) and fruit (9.92%) crops. Intervention of fodder
crops reduced in feeding requirement of poultry (28.6%) and piggery (39.3%). Promotion of
IFS increase overall net income (Rs. 2,46,160/-) as compared traditional income of jhum
farming (Rs. 52,248/-). Overall interventions of crops, livestock, fishery and secondary
farming enlarged employment opportunity (506 man-days) as compared to traditional jhum
farming (72 man-days). Adoption of the farming system there was improvement in soil
health resulted in overall enrichment in soil organic carbon (SOC), available N & P status but
soil pH and available K content deceased or more or less remains unchanged. Therefore,
promotion of rainwater harvesting, crop diversification, inclusion of animal and fishery
components as well as secondary agriculture is viable intervention for the tribal jhumias for
overall improvement in productivity, income, employment, food, nutritional and ecological
security through sustainable use of natural resources.
Fig.5 Digging of artificial pond. Fig. 6 Harvested water in artificial pond (8.75 lakh litre).
Flagship programme on Jhum improvement for food security of tribal farmers through
sustainable agriculture has been undertaken in Nagaland. About 61% of the total
households of the state practice shifting cultivation in about 1.00 lakh hectare of land
annually thereby exposing about 5.65% of the total geographical area of the state to soil
erosion hazards. The centre targets to improve jhum cultivation practices through
inclusion of improved crop varieties, RCT and agro-forestry interventions in farmers
participatory mode..
Popularization of location specific Integrated Farming System: Based on the evaluation
and profitability of the IFS model developed by the centre, the centre targets to
replicate the models with appropriate modification suiting the location in other districts
of Nagaland.
Promotion of rain water harvesting and its efficient utilization for higher water
productivity : In Nagaland, more than 75% of the rainfall (2000mm) is concentrated
during the period of June-September which constraints crop intensification,
diversification. Small and fragmented land holding, poor investment capacity and lack of
adequate knowledge about improved agricultural practices further concentrate the
problems of poor productivity and profitabilities of agriculture sector. Farm
mechanisation is also yet to start for reducing dragger to the farmers and timely
ensuring agriculture practices. To mitigate the problem, the centre envisaged blending
technology demonstration, capacity building and linkage establishment in systematic
and holistic approach to transform rural economy to a profitable enterprise. A such,
ICAR Nagaland Centre conceived the training and demonstration programme under
National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) and Tribal Sub Plan
(TSP)on promotion of water harvesting structures in Dimapur, Peren, Wokha, Longleng,
Kiphire and Tuensang districts of Nagaland for increasing the cropping intensity, crop
diversification and farm profitability. Around 3500 farmers from the different districts of
Nagaland, Dimapur, Peren, Wokha, Longleng, Kiphire and Tuensang were trained for
resource conservation technologies, water harvesting and its efficient utilization through
sprinkler and drip irrigation. A total of number of 15 large (8.75 lakh litres capacity), 3
Medium (2.0 lakh litres capacity), 52 Small (63,000 litres capacity) and 110 very small
(30,000 lakh litres capacity) water harvesting structures were developed for
demonstration at farmer’s field. The impact for the development of water harvesting
structures was most significant. In this programme all total 20.3 million litres of water
was harvested and the farmers used the water during lean period (November- January)
for multiple purpose like, production of winter vegetables, fishery, piggery etc. and
could increase their farm income 200% over the previous years.
Promotion of secondary and tertiary agriculture including post harvest management:
The state is bestowed with indigenous fruits and vegetables which are having high
medicinal values. The centre targets to improved secondary and tertiary agriculture
includes postharvest management of crops for enhancing farm profitability through
training and demonstration.
Distribution and popularization of mushroom spawn & cultivation, improved breed of
piglets and chicks under pig farming and backyard poultry rearing in Nagaland:
Promotion of oyster mushroom cultivation for small and marginal farmers of Nagaland
was undertaken by supplying quality mushroom spawn to SHGs/rural unemployed
youths/NGOs. Dissemination of oyster mushroom cultivation technology through
method demonstration was given to 577 numbers of farmers during which 14228 nos. of
packets were supplied. The centre also guided one young entrepreneur in establishing
spawn production unit to meet the spawn demand as secondary sources of income to
Jumias. The scientific rearing of pig and poultry birds was popularized among the
farmers of Nagaland as well as other north eastern states. A total of 241698 nos. of
chicks and 2847 nos. of piglets were distributed from the centre. Scientific practice of AI
in Pig enhanced the production of piglets from superior breeding stock available under
Mega Seed Project on Pig is growing in popularity among the farmers.
Promotion of protected cultivation and value addition of Horticultural crops: Scientific
cultivation of various fruits and vegetable crops like Banana, Litchi, Arecanut, Guava,
Pineapples, Citrus, Coconut, Kiwi, Tomato, Chilli, Cole crops, Large cardamom, Turmeric,
King Chilli, etc have been taken up for orchard development as well as part of Inter
cropping and multistoried cropping system models. Protected cultivation has been
standardized for quality production of various vegetables and ornamental plants.
Growing of high value crops like capsicum, king chilli, tomato, flowers like lilium,
gerberas, anthuriums orchids and roses under naturally ventilated polyhouse and
shadenet houses have been popularized. Black polythene mulch technology is gaining
popularity among pineapple growers in Nagaland because of high productivity, quality
produce and its economic viability. A number of value added products from Jackfruit,
Citrus, Mango, different vegetables like tomato, chilli, tuber crops, mushroom etc. have
been developed. For dissemination of technologies, region and crop specific training and
Almost all the hilly areas of the state fall within the Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District
Council (TTAADC), which comprises 7132.56 sq km and form about 67.98% of the State. Of
the total area ADC, as much as 5911 sq km (82.87%) is forest land under the effective
control/ management of the State Forest Department. As per legal status, these forests
comprise of (a) 3582 sq km of Reserved Forests (RF), (b) 258 sq km of Proposed Reserved
Forests (PRF) and (c) 2071 sq km of Protected Forests (PF), re-designated as Unclassified
Government Forests (UGF). The UGF outside the ADC area is only 125 sq km. On strict legal
term, no one would be allowed to do shifting cultivation in forest areas, unless otherwise
proven that it is needed as part of the forest management practice. On the other hand, the
ADC is charged with the constitutional mandate of “ Regulation of the practice of shifting
cultivation”[Link] are 40,000 jhumia families within ADC areas, of which 21,099 families
reside within the Reserve Forest areas (Table 4).
Table 5: Jhumia and jhum area statistics in accordance to the districts of Tripura
Total jhumia Total jhumia Jhum area sown in Total area affected
Districts
population households 2004-05 (ha) by jhum (in ha)
West 38,723 7,569 2,397 15,120
South 65,485 12,713 4,448 28,080
Dhalai 63,568 11,824 5,008 32,400
North 41,424 7,895 5,272 33,242
Total 209,200 40,001 17,125 1,08,842
Source: State Agriculture Research Centre, Department of Agriculture, Government of
Tripura, Agartala (2005)
surface vegetation before planting6. Plots located in hill forest lands are normally chosen for
jhum cultivation. Shrubs and creepers are cleared, and smaller trees are cut. After the
clearing process, which usually takes place in the month of April and May, the cleared jungle
is left to dry under the sun, in order to be burned later on. The ‘singing’ raindrops thereof
bring the villages into a state of activity for jhum cultivation. Each adult member carries to
the field a small basket filled with mixed seeds of food grains, vegetables and cash crops.
The above crops will be ready for harvesting from July to December.7
Jhumias adopt mixed cropping and the mixture of crops varies from tribe to tribe within a
region. Among the food grains the coarse varieties of rice, maize, millet, and small millets
are the principal crops while cotton, ginger, pigeon pea, rapeseeds, sesamum, pineapple
and jute are important cash crops, and soybean, potato, pumpkins, cucumbers, yams,
tapioca, chillies, beans, onion, arum are vegetables grown in jhum fields. In fact, the choice
of crop is consumption oriented, and the jhumias aims at growing everything that he needs
for his family consumption. These crops harvest at different periods, thereby providing the
tribes with varied food for nearly six to nine months in a year (Table 6). In addition, soil
exhausting crops, e.g., rice, maize, millets, cotton, etc., and soil enriching crops, e.g.,
legumes, are grown together. This practice has many direct and indirect advantages. The
same jhum land is cropped by the community for two years, thereafter; the land is
abandoned to recuperate. Occasionally, some residual crops are collected from the
abandoned fields. Further, consecutive cropping is generally observed for two years in a
cleared piece of land. As one patch every year is abandoned, a new patch is cleared. Thus,
two patches are cultivated simultaneously every year, and these two patches are generally
quite at a distance from each other.
was partly due to the limited population and partly to the better fertility of soil which used
to be rested for nearly thirty to forty years. The tribes in which the jhum cycle is around five
years are facing serious problems of undernourishment and their ecosystems are fast losing
their resilience characteristics.
reduces his reliance with other allied activities or external inputs. Besides burning and
slashing in the jhum plots, other cultural practices are followed like controlling the weeds,
soil-borne pathogens and other diseases of crops. Jhumias also practice their indigenous
religious customs like offering their Gods and Goddesses during harvest. Negligible
interventions of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides by jhumias in Tripura may lead to
protection of soil health partially. Therefore, jhum cultivation is having some positive
aspects and Govt. of Tripura allows tribal people to do jhum to some extent but through
improved and modern ways as jhum provides base for low external input agricultural
technologies.
Negative aspects of jhum cultivation
Problems relating to shifting cultivation through slash and burn are not new in Tripura. As
early as 1876, W.W. Hunter in his book, ‘Statistical Account of the Hill Tipperah’ had marked
that the “regression of forests had already started in hills because of shifting cultivation
practiced by almost the whole population numbering less than 50000 who were all tribals”.
Jhum cultivation starts with cutting and burning of trees and leads to degradation of forest
or deforestation in the hilly areas where they used the land to do jhum. Deforestation has
negative effects on the environment which ultimately leads to climate change which
nowadays a matter of global concern. Deforestation may also affect the flora and fauna
existing in the forest. One of the most vital negative environmental impacts of shifting
cultivation is the damage that causes to the soil system. It accelerates the soil erosion and
nutrient loss manifold. If the total area under shifting cultivation in Tripura is considered
67000 ha, the account of soil and nutrient loss in Tripura annually is presented in table
11.11Out of the available nutrients, the loss in thge available nitrogen constitute 40% and
the total quantity from 67000 ha of land is 1662 to and such a huge qauntyty annually lost is
valued as Rs. 216 lakh in terms of nitrogenous fertilizers. Erosion is slight in soils well
covered by dense grasses or forest but is enormous from steep, poorly covered jhum lands
as reported in Megaha;laya (Prasad and Sharma, 1994).
Table 10: Soil and nutrient loss in shifting cultivation site of Tripura11
Parameters Soil/nutrient loss (ton)
Soil 49.6 lakh
Organic matter 1.42 lakh
Available nutrients 4154
The second year of jhum cycle is comparatively hazardous than the first year from the point
of soil erosion. The possible implication of actual soil loss vis-a-vis productivity loss is given
in Table 11 (Higgins et al. 1982). Normally soil loss tolerance ranges from 7.5 to 12 t/ha/.
These ares are exposed to hazaerds odf intense rains and often on terrains which promotes
erosion. However, most of the areas have been under use of centuries and are therefore,
subjected to different degrees of degradation. Since 50 t/ha corresponds to a soil depth of
reduction of only 3-4mm, soil losses of such magnitude as reported are hardly noticed by
the shifting cultivator even they are convinced of their occurrence. The loss ofv 6the top few
millimetres of shallow depth soil, where organic carbon and biological activity are
concentrated, may signioficantly decrease soil fertility and crop yield.
Table 11: Relationship between soil erosion and decline in land productivity11
Soil loss (t/ha) Anticipated productivity losses
<12 No change in land productivity
12-15 50% of area of very productive land shows a diminishing trend to
productive land, the remainder remains unchanged
50-100 100% of all productive land shows a diminishing trend by one
productive class
101-200 50% of the area of all productive land is converted to suitable land, the
remainder shows diminishing trend by one productive class
>201 The entire area of productive land is converted to not suitable class
The changes in the soil properties of shifting cultivation sites need to be documented and
regularly monitored to bring about an improvement in the areas under the practice of
shifting cultivation over the centuries. As such soil samples were collected over a period of
1-3 years in Tripura and were analysed (Datta et al, 2001). Soils were acidic with pH ranging
from 4.5 to 5.1 (Table 13). A decline in 0.1 to 0.2 units was registered with the rise in shifting
cycle from 1 to 3 years. The exchange acidity varying from 1.95 to 2.51 showed arise from
1st to 3rd year of shifting cycle. Due to the rapid mineralization over the shifting cycle,
organic carbon underwent rapid oxidation as noted from the decrease in the values from
7.3 to 6.5 and 8.3 to 6.1 g/kg in soil sites under study. Bulk density remained unchanged but
water holding capacity showed a decline from 34 to 32% and 40 to 35% probably to
reduction in organic matter and erosion of soil finer soil fraction from the soil matrix. On the
other hand, cation exchange capacity (CEC) showed a decreasing trend primarily due to
erosive loss of soil clay and organic matter. Exchangeable cations underwent decline with
the rise in shifting cycle owing to leaching losses. But base saturation showed an increasing
trend mainly due to sharp decline in CEC.
Data on nutrient availability in soils under shifting cultivation are presented in table 13.
Available nitrogen status of which varied from high to medium showed a sharp decline with
the rise in shifting cycle. Available phosphorus (Bray P/1) was low. Available potassium
varying from low to medium also showed a decreasing trend in soils under shifting
cultivation. The DTPA extractable Fe/Mn underwent a inconsistent variation but the soil s
were found to contain adequate amounts of theses cations.
Lack of Proper Education: Available data on dropouts of students in the state revealed
existence of educational wastage both at the State and national level. Dropout rate at the
primary stage was estimated to be significantly higher in schedule tribes than the general
category of pupils and scheduled caste. Same trends were also observed in the middle and
secondary stages. This proves the unsteady as well as pathetic conditions of the tribal
communities in India.
6. Jhum developmental programmes in Tripura
Problems related to shifting cultivation through slash and burn are not new to Tripura. As
early as 1876, W. W. Hunter12 in his book ‘Statistical Account of the Hill Tipperah” had
remarked that the regression of forests had already started in hills because of shifting
cultivation practiced by almost the whole population numbering less than 50,000 who were
all tribals”. Even successive Maharajas of Tripura were genuinely concerned that the
practiced be continued or that the tribals should be drawn to settled agriculture in place of
jhum.
Tripura has fairly long history of jhum control and jhumia rehabilitation programmes.13 The
first plan was drawn up 1953-54 in which each jhumia family was allotted 5 acres of arable
land and a grant of Rs. 500/- for land development and purchase of essentials to support
settled farming. From this period upto 1955-56, the jhumias were settled sporadically. From
1956-57 onwards, the approach of resettlement or rehabilitation was on compact colony so
that other basic amenities can be provided. Tripura has implemented (and/or is
implementing) the following various programmes and schemes for rehabilitation of jhumias
and jhum land, involving at least 8 various departments or agencies of the government
(Table 14). Computed from different sources to show indicative achievement. Infact official
documentation regarding improved jhum/ jhumming for sustainability is meagre if not nil.
In 2007, the Forest Department completed a first-ever Census enumeration of hard core
shifting cultivators and found 27,278 families (or 1, 36,000 persons) dependent on jhum.
The total count shows a clear decline in the number of jhumia families. The following table
shows a clear cline in the number of jhumia families though it has increased from 1968 to
1987 but after that it has declined due to varied Government schemes.
Table 15: Number of households and persons dependent on jhum, Tripura, 1968 to 2007
No. of persons
Year Source of the estimate No. of households
(in lakh)
1968 J.B. Ganguly 25000 --
1978 Benchmark Survey (1978) 46854 2.59
1987 Benchmark Survey (1987) 55049 2.88
1999 Department of Tribal Welfare 51265 --
2007 Forest Department 27278 1.36
Source: TDHR, 2007; pp-37
3. [Link]
tripura (Last visited on 10. 11. 2017)
4. Darlong V. T. 2012. Shifting paradigm on shifting cultivation: revisiting challanges and
oiptions for transforming ‘Lives, landscapes and livelihoods’in Tripura from the experience
of NERCORMP-IFAD in Northeast India. In: Shifting cultivation in Tripura (ed. Devvarma NC),
Tripura Research and Cultural Institute, Govt. Of Tripura, pp66
5. State Agriculture Research Centre, Department of Agriculture, Government of Tripura,
Agartala (2005)
6. Bhattacharjee P.R. ‘Sociological Aspects of Resource Use Pattern in Tripura: An Analysis in
Historical Perspective’, Tui (A Quarterly Research Magazine on Tribal Life and Culture),
September- November, [Link], 1993.
7. Bhattacharjee, P.R. and Ganguli, J.B., ‘Relative Economic Status of Social Groups: A Study in
Inequality’, Journal of North-East Council for Social Science Research, Vol. 17, No.2, October
1993.
8. [Link]
cycle-and-problems (Last visited on 10. 11. 2017)
9. Personal communication with Department of Agriculture, Govt. Of Tripura, Agartala
10. [Link] visited on 10. 11. 2017)
11. Datta M and Singh N. P. 2012. Shifting paradigm on shifting cultivation: revisiting challanges
and oiptions for transforming ‘Lives, landscapes and livelihoods’in Tripura from the
experience of NERCORMP-IFAD in Northeast India. In: Shifting cultivation in Tripura (ed.
Devvarma NC), Tripura Research and Cultural Institute, Govt. Of Tripura, pp66
12. Hunter W. W. 1876. Statistical Account of the Hill Tipperah (Reprint).
13. Dev Varman S. B. K. 1971. A study over the jhum and jhumia rehabilitation in the Union
Territory of Tripura. Directorate of Research, Department of Welfare for Scheduled Tribes &
Scheduled Castes, Government of Tripura, Agartala.
14. [Link]
for-paddy/
15. L. Rinjah, ‘Land Use Pattern – Jhumming and Control, Settled and Terraced Cultivation with
Related Problems,’ in T. Mathew (Ed.), (1981), North Eastern Hills Regions of India –
Problems and Prospects of Development. New Delhi: Agricole Publishing Academy
16. Anthony Patton (1981), ‘Socio-Economic Impact Of Shifting Cultivation Control Schemes In
Nagaland - A Case Study Of Baghty In Wokha District,’ Pp 38-40. in T. Mathew (1981, Ibid.)
17. Tripura Statistical Department: 18th Round of NSS (1963-64). Indebtedness of Scheduled
Tribe Households in Tripura. In J.B. Ganguly, ‘Progress of Jhumia Rehabilitation in Tripura: a
critical review,’ in T. Mathew (1981, ibid.)
18. MoEF 2003, p.10
19. Ibid, p.14
Agriculture has evolved from hunting and food gathering to modern input driven intensive
farming during the last 10,000 years. Hunting, shifting cultivation and pastoral nomadism
preceded settled agriculture. Shifting cultivation is still prevalent in many tropical countries
more particularly on the hills upto 1500 m above sea level. The core activities of shifting
cultivation involves periodic shift to new land as the fertility of original patch is exhausted.
The location specific variations in crop husbandry, cultivations practices, benefit sharing etc
were deeply influenced by the local cultural values, production constraints, constraints of
labour, capital and requirements, physiography, and associated ecological conditions. Most
of the variants were aimed at making the food production sufficient to meet the demand of
the surrounding population. It was practiced by our ancestor’s 10-12 thousand years ago,
but it is still source of food for millions of farmers from Asian, Africa and Latin America.
Globally, over 300 million people practice shifting cultivation over more than 400 million
hectares (cf Teegalapalli, and Datta, 2016). It has been a successful adaption in difficult
environmental conditions in tropics particularly when the rotation is kept 15-20 years. This
is a natural way of utilizing vegetative means for replenishing soil fertility instead of costly
chemicals and organic matter applied externally in more developed settled agriculture. It
was most naturally adopted and adapted farming in the limitations of communication,
nonexistence of alternative means of soil nutrition like chemical fertilizers and compulsion
of meeting all the food, fiber, fodder, fuel needs from the field itself and availability of forest
land was plenty because of very low population density.
The local adaptations of the Shifting cultivations were heavily influenced by the community
structure and cultural life of the tillers. Therefore it was an ecologically sustainable form of
agriculture in the montane region of the tropics when population densities was low and
fallow periods were long enough to restore soil fertility to support crop production for the
community. These traditional food systems, previously existing in ecological balance with
their environment, are now breaking down under pressure of population expansion and
increasing demand. The immediate adoption of increasing population was area expansion
and reduction of fallow period. Initially, when the population pressure increases, the fields
are tilled more frequently reducing the fallow period as shifting of fields to distance from
the habitation has a maximum limit beyond which it is not physically possible to continue
access and do cultivation. Then starts the trend of cultivating more area having less soil
fertility, so that the food demand of the community is met with. This cycle of fertility
degradation leads to development barren and degraded land on which cultivation is no
more economically viable. This was the major contributing factor for land degradation
resulting in migration and threatening livelihood of the Jhumias. In the search for solutions
to the problems of shifting cultivation, attention has turned to agroforestry. Since shifting
Assam Chakma, Dimasa, Garo, Hajong, H’mar, Khasi, Jaintia, Synteng, Pnar,
War, Bhoi, Lyngngam, Kuki tribes-including (biate, Changsan, Chongloi,
Doungel, Gamalhou, Gangte, Guite, Hanneug, Haokip, Hampit, Lhonyen,
Lhochwun, Lupheng, Mangje, Misao, Riang, Sairhem, Selnam, Singson,
Hoalai, Hengna, Hoangsungh, Hrangkhwal, Raokhol, Tongpe,
Khawathlang, Khothalong, Khawchung, Khelma, Kholhou, Kipgen, Kuki,
Lengthang, Lhangum, Lihougem, Lhouvum, Misao, Sairhem, Selnam,
Sitlhou, Sukto, Thasou, Thangngeu, Uibush, Vaiphei), Lakher, Man (Tai
speaking), any Mizo (Lushai) Tribes, Mikir, Nay Naga tribes, Pawi,
Barmans in Cachar, Boro, Borokachari, Deori, Hojai, Kachari, Sonowal,
Lalung, Mech, Miri, Rabha
Manipur Aimol, Anal, Angami, Chiru, Chethe, Gangte, H’mar, Kabui, Kacha Naga,
Koirao, Koireng, Kom, Lamgang, Mao, Maram, Maring, Any Mizo (Lushai)
tribe, Monsang, Monyon, Paite, Purum, Ralte, Sema, Simte, Suhte,
Thangkhul, Thadou, Vaiphei, Zou.
Mizoram Chakma, Dimasa Kachari, Garo, Hajong, H’mar, Khasi, Jaintia, War, Any
Kuki (Biate, Changsan, Chongloi, Doungel, Gamalhou, Gangte, Guite,
Hanneug, Haokip, Hanpit, Lhonyem, Lhocwun, Lupheng, Mangje, Misao,
Riang, Sairhem, Selnam, Haolai, Hengna, Hongsunh, Hrangkhwal,
Roakhol, Tongbe, Kghawathlang, Khothalong, Khawchung, Khelma,
Khoihou, Kipgen, Kuki, Lengthang, Lhangum, Lhoujem, Lhouvum, Misao,
Riang Sairhem, Selnam, Singsom, Sitlhou, Sukto, Thado, Thangngeu,
Uibush, Vaiphel) Lekher, Man (Tai speaking), many Mizo (Lushai tribe),
Karbi, many Naga tribe, Pawi.
Meghalaya Bhoi, Boro, Chakma, Dimasa, Hajong, H’mar, Jaintia, Karbi, (Mikir), Khasi,
Koch, Kuki, Lakher, Lyngngam, Man (Tai speaking), Naga, Pawi, Rabhi
Nagaland Adi, Aka, Dimasa, Galong, Garo, Khasi and Jaintia, Khowa, Kuki, Karbi,
(Mikir), Mizo, Any Naga tribe (Ao, Angami, Chakhesanf, Chang, Chiru,
Khliemnungan, Konnyak, Lotha, Makwari, Phom, Rengma, Sangtam,
Sema, Tikhir, Yimchungree, Zeliang, Synteng, Momba.
Tripura Bhil, Bhutia, Chaimal, Chakma, Garo, Halam, Jamatia, Khasia, Kuki,
including following sub-tribes (Baite, Belalhut, Chhalya, Fun, Hajong,
Jangtei, Khareng, Khephong, Kuntei, Laifaung, Lentei, Mizel, Namte,
Paitu, Paite, Rangchan, Rangkhole, Thangluya) Lepcha, Lushai, Mag,
Munda, Kaur, Noatia, Orang, Riang, Santal, Tripuri, Tippera, Uchai.
Sikkim Lepchas, Bhutias, Limbu
Jhum cultivation in the North East region is a complex system with wide variation that
depends upon the ecological variation in the area and cultural diversity among various tribal
clans. However, the basic cropping practice is quite similar. Usually all the essential crops
such as paddy, maize, tapioca, colocasia, millets, sweet potato, ginger etc. are grown on the
same piece of land as mixed crop. Poor soil conditions, use of elementary tools such as axe
and the hoe, low density of population in the region and low level of consumption are the
distinctive feature of jhum cultivation. Generally shifting cultivation is characterized with
low productivity, extensive land requirement and degradation of natural resources. This
traditional system of farming is characterized by high crop diversity and good productivity
especially in first two years.
Though jhum it is primarily an economic activity performed for production for crops,
however, it is also integrated with socio-cultural and religious activities of tribal populations.
Jhumias basically belief in spiritual quality of nature and they believe that supernatural
power controls forest, land, soil, fertility and health of farmers as well as animals. They
perform rites and ritual and offer animal sacrifice to please the spirit. Every stage of jhum
cultivation is accompanied by ritual and feast. Even the major events of life such as
marriage, festivals, house construction are directly or indirectly adjusted to jhum cultivation
and villager’s emotions and sentiments are interwoven with jhum. Before starting jhum,
farmers perform rituals for seeking apology for damaging plant and animals in the process
of burning of jhum field. This ritual shows the concern of farming community toward
biodiversity conservation. Some areas with high endemic biodiversity are declared sacred
groove and practicing jhum in these areas is totally prohibited. Nishis (a major tribe of
Arunachal Pradesh), believe that Sengri and Sengne (Ficus sp.) are abode of Wiyus (spirit)
and to cut them is tabooed. In some areas Meghalaya, during cleaning of forest vegetation
is partial short tree stump and large tree bole are kept intact to stabilize the slope, reduce
soil erosion and to be used as support for the climber crops. Trees belonging to Schima
wallichii, Calicarpa arborea, Castanopsis tribuloides, Gemlina arborea and Eurya japonica
are left over during cleaning the field. Bamboo used as soil binder facilities soil nutrient
recovery and creates microhabitats of shade loving species (Rao and Ramkrishanan, 1989).
In few instances farmers are planting Bambus tulda, Toona ciliata, Duabanga grandifolia
and Manihot esculenta along the boundaries of shifting cultivation fields and fruit trees such
as Artocarpus chaplasha, Citrus sp., Litchi chinensis, Mangifera indica, Myrica esculanta,
Prunus nepalensis and Musa sp. in jhum plots (Deb et al, 2013). If we look at larger
prospective, this traditional farming has allowed tropical forest to survive or at least
regenerate where as settled agriculture has destroyed the forest completely.
In Garo tribe, more than 10 festival and rituals are associated with jhum cultivation (Marak,
2006) which starts from site selection to final harvesting and storing the produce. Similarly,
in Khasi tribe, inhabiting khasi hills of Meghalaya, prayers are performed before burning the
forest (Mini Rokime), during sowing to drive away crop diseases (Mi Amua), at the time of
first harvest (Rongchu gala-fowl is scarified before deity), and after harvest of jhum field (Ja
Megapa). In Jaintia tribe, inhabiting jaintia hills of Meghalaya, Longhai festival is celebrated
during weeding period in millet. In all other states of north east India also various festivals
are associated with jhum cultivation. In Nishis, a major tribe of Arunachal Pradesh, major
festivals revolve around jhum. Before starting cultivation, Mnyokom- Yulo is celebrated and
vaiours deities such as Yapom (god of jungle), Yulo, Tangang-Yulo and Regeu-Yulo (gods of
agriculture) are invoked to protect crops from diseases, insects and wild animals. After the
harvest Sirom Molo Sochum festival is celebrated in the month of Rojo (December).
Similarly, in kukis of Manipur KheLhai-Khai ceremony, Athusian ceremony, Tuilunta
ceremony, Muchitu ceremony and Mim Kut, Lohan Kut and Chapchar Kut etc. are associated
with jhum. This amazing and colourful traditional farming system is also associated with
traditional knowledge of plants. Mao tribe inhabiting northern hills of Senapari districts of
Manipur, are able correlate the flowing of different trees as indicator of seasons and
accordingly important jhum activities are planned (Mao and Hynniewta, 2010). Rice, Millets
etc. are planted in Jhum field with the onset of flowing in Kachnar tree (Bauhinina purpurea)
locally known as camel foot in Mao tribe. Similarly, Prunus carmesina (wild cherry) and
Prunus persica (peach) fruit trees flowers in March, and flowering of these trees is
considered as appropriate time for direct sowing upland paddy in jhum field and lowland
paddy in nursery. Mantisia spathulata plants, locally known as dancing girl, flower every
year in May and flowering is not affected by environmental factors. Mao people consider
flowering of dancing girl as right time for transplanting of rice seedlings in lowlands.
Therefore it is essential to give due consideration to the cultural values and local traditions
of the Jhumias while devising any strategies to improve productivity of such lands. The
approach should adopt Integral systems that should stem from a more traditional, year
round, community-wide, largely self-contained, and ritually-sanctioned way of life.
Agroforestry Systems suitable for enhancing productivity and reducing fallow period of
Jhum land
Alder based system in Nagaland
The Angamis tribe from Nagaland used to practice such a alder based sustainable jhum
system that was developed in Khonoma village in Nagaland. It provides about 57 food crops
to supplement the staple crop rice. The root nodules of the Alder (Alnus nepalensis) plants
improve soil fertility by fixing atmospheric nitrogen into the soil through Frankia. The fallen
leaves act as mulches and add humus to the topsoil. The wood is used as fuel-wood, for
charcoal burning and in construction works. Alder saplings collected from nursery or wild
forest are planted in a jhum field located in hills above 1000 m. In the first year in jhum
plots, alder trees are pollarded at a height of 2 m from the ground before or after the slash
and burn operation. Mixed cropping is repeated in the second year. The field is then left
fallow for 2-4 years to allow the alder trees to grow for pollarding and cropping in the
subsequent cycle. Young trees with bole circumference of about 50-80 cm are pollarded for
the first time, usually at the age of 7-10 years. Cyclical/subsequent pollarding is performed
after 4-6 years. During this operation, the pollarded stumps that coppice profusely are
allowed to grow till the harvest of the first year’s crop. On the second year, 4-5 selected
shoots are retained and the rest is removed. These shoots are allowed to grow till the next
jhum cycle and the same process is repeated. Thus with the incorporation of alder trees in
their jhum lands, the fertility of the field is increased (Singh et al, 2013).
Broom produced 63 q ha-1 flower (most remunerative part of it), 86 q ha-1 of green fodder
and 36 q ha-1 of dry fuel wood. This system generated net return of Rs. 23,444 per ha. Bhatt
et al (2010) evaluated seven MPTs such as Acacia auriculiformis, Alnus nepalensis, Bauhinia
purpurea, Exbucklandia populnea, Ficus hookeri, Michelia champaca, Michelia oblonga with
broom grass in the understorey in the mid hill conditions of Meghalaya. After 10 years,
highest standing volume was recorded in Acacia auriculiformis (220.28 m3 ha-1) followed by
Exbucklandia populnea (120.08 m3 ha-1) and Alnus nepalensis (114.13 m3 ha-1). Yield of
broom grass cultivated in the tree inter pasces varied from 3.817 t ha-1 dry biomass (under
Bauhinia purpurea) to 2.361t ha-1 (under Alnus nepalensis). Non-arable hilly areas with high
slopes (> 45 %) and low soil depth (<0.6 m) can be managed under suitable tree and grass
combinations under livestock based silvipastoral system. In an experiment at I C A R
Research Complex for NEH Region, Meghalaya, 13.54 t ha-1(Dry Matter) forage yield was
obtained from combination of stylo and setaria with alder. A combination of stylo and
guinea grass with alder could produce 11.30 DM t ha-1. In addition alder could provide 1.32 t
ha-1 of fule wood from the pruned branches.
Sericulture based agroforestry system
Seven mulberry varieties, seven silkworm breeds including a bivoltine breed (NB-18) were
studied for their yield and rearing performance. The results obtained are presented in the
Table 5.
Table 5. Yield of mulberry and silkworm cocoon in sericulture based agroforestry system
Mulberry Plant Height Yield (t ha-1 yr-1 ) Net returns from
variety (m) Leaf Cocoon Fuelwood cocoon (Rs ha-1)
TR-4 1.70 19.1 0.81 6.4 33,449
TR-10 1.69 16.6 0.70 6.3 27,125
BC-259 1.44 15.2 0.65 5.7 23,627
S-1635 1.51 18.2 0.77 6.1 31,085
C-7635 1.52 16.5 0.70 5.6 26,865
Kanva-2 1.43 14.1 0.60 5.7 21,715
Local 1.28 9.1 0.39 4.1 8,215
Source : Dhyani et al (1996)
Thus jhum cultivation, is perhaps, a sustainable way of farming in remote and inaccessible
areas and infertile soil where heavy inputs cannot be used. Same farmer practice intensive
farming in fertile lowland field and jhum farming in remote and infertile hilly areas.
Moreover jhum is associated various rites, ritual and ceremonies and people are
emotionally attached with jhum farming. However in recent past, due to rural depopulation,
area under jhum is shrinking. Jhum cultivation should not be looked as only an economic
activity, but it should be considered in the light of high agrobiodiverisy and rich culture
associated with it. Jhum farming is the way of life for tribal population of North East India.
References
Bhan, S. 2009. A case study on shifting cultivation practices in Mon district of Nagaland.
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 8(2): 8-13
Bhatt, B.P., Sachan, M.S. and Singh, K.2006. Production potential of traditional agroforestry
systems of Meghalaya: A case study. . In Agroforestry in North-East India:
Opportunities and challenges. Eds. [Link]. and K.M. Bujarbaruah. I C A R Research
Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 337-349 pp
Chauhan, D.S. and Dhyani, S.K. (1990). Traditional agroforestry practices in north east
Himalayan regions of India. Indian Journal of Dry Land Agricultural Research and
Development. 4(2):73-81.
Chauhan, D.S. and Dhyani, S.K. (1991) Existing agroforestry practices of Meghalaya. Journal
of Hill Research. 4(1):19-23.
Dhyani, S.K., Chauhan, D.S., Kumar, D., Kushwaha, V. and Lepcha, S.T. (1996). Sericulture
based agroforestry system for hilly area of north-east India. Agroforestry Systems.
34:247-258.
Maithani, B.P. 2005. Shifting cultivation in the North-East India: Policy Issues and Options.
Mittal Publications, New Delhi. 179 p.
Raintree, JB and Warner, K, 1986. Agroforestry pathways for the intensification of shifting
cultivation. Agroforestry Systems. 4: 39-54
Sahoo, U. K., Rocky, P., Vanlalhriatpuia, K and Upadhyaya, K. [Link] diversity and
functional dynamism of traditional homegardens of north-east India. The
Bioscan.1:159-171
Teegalapalli, K and Datta, A. 2016. Field to a forest: Patterns of forest recovery following
shifting cultivation in the Eastern Himalaya. Forest Ecology and Management
364:173–182
Bhatt, B.P., Singha, L.B., Satapathy, K.K., Sharma, Y.P. and Bujarbaruah, K.M. 2010.
Rehabilitation of shifting cultivation areas through Agroforestry: A case study in
eastern Himalayas, India. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 22(1):13-20
Deb, S.; Lynrah,M. M. And Tiwari, B. K. 2013. Technological innovations in shifting gricultural
practices by three tribal farming communities of Methalaya, north east India.
Tropical ecology. 54(2):133-148.
Lombi, P. and Riba, T. 2016. Declining shifting cultivation and loose of tribal culture: with
special reference to tribes of Arunachal Pradesh. International Journal of Emerging
Technology and Advanced Engineering. 6(5): 183-191.
Mao, A.A. and Hynniewta, T.M. (2000). Floristic diversity of North East India. J. Assam Sci.
Soc., 41 (4): 255-266.
Mao, A.A. and Hynniewta, T.M. 2011. Plants used agriculture season indicator by Mao tribe
Manipur Meghalaya, India. Indian journal of Traditional Knowledge. 10(3): 578-580.
Marak, F. K. 2006. Major folk festivals of Garos with special reference to cultivation: a
critical study. Ph. D. Thesis. Department of Garo, NEHU, Tura. 6-16.
Singh, A. K., Arunachalam, A., Ngachan, S.V., Mohapatra, K.P. and Dagar, J.C. 2013. From
Shifting Cultivation to Integrating Farming: Experience of Agroforestry Development
in the Northeastern Himalayan Region. In: (Eds) A. K. Singh et al (2013) Agroforestry
Systems in India: Livelihood Security & Ecosystem Services. Advances in Agroforestry
Volume 10, 2014, pp 57-86
The North-eastern region comprises of eight states viz., Assam, Arunachal Pradesh,
Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura and Sikkim lying between 21.5o N - 29.5o
N latitudes and 85.5 o E - 97.3 o E longitudes. It has a total geographical area of 2,62,180 km2
which is nearly 8% of the total geographical area of the country. In the whole of NE region,
about 35% area is plain and the remaining 65% area is under hills. Whereas in Assam, plains
account for 84.44% of its total geographical area and the remaining 15.56% area is under
hills. Net sown area is highest in Assam (34.12%) followed by Tripura (23.48%), however,
Arunachal Pradesh has lowest net sown area in the region. Cropping intensity is highest in
Tripura (173%) followed by Manipur (152.1%), Mizoram (136.36%) and Assam (123.59%).
The region has unique weather and climatic condition because of its typical geographical
location, physiography, highlands in the northern part and their syntaxial bend, presence of
alternating pressure cells of North West and Bay of Bengal and presence of tropical
maritime air masses (Barthakur, 2004).
Shifting cultivation: traditional landuse system in NE
Shifting cultivation or Jhum is the most primitive and popular farming practiced across the
entire NEH region which is essentially an agroforestry system organized both in space and
time (Ramakrishnan, 1992). Jhum is a way of life that is deeply entrenched in the artifacts,
sociofacts and mantifacts of the tribal way of life in the north east. It is locally known as Rep
Sytri in Khasi; Lo in Mizo etc. It has been practiced over 9000 years and said to have been
originated in the Neolithic era dated by the archeologists to 7000 B.C. (Maithani, 2005).
Jhum in the region is a complex system with wide variation that depends upon the
ecological variation in the area and cultural diversity among various tribal clans. However,
there are some commonalities in the basic cropping practice. Usually all the essential crops
such as paddy, maize, tapioca, colocasia, millets, sweet potato etc. are grown on the same
piece of land as mixed crop. Jhum in its most traditional form is not a very unsustainable
land-use practice particularly when the Jhum cycle is more than 20 years. The soils get
enough time to rejuvenate and restore their health and productive capacity. The Angami
tribe from Nagaland used to practice such as alder based sustainable jhum system that was
developed in Khonoma village in Nagaland. It provides about 57 food crops to supplement
the staple crop rice. The root nodules of the Alder (Alnus nepalensis) plants improve soil
fertility by fixing atmospheric nitrogen into the soil through Frankia. The fallen leaves act as
mulches and add humus to the topsoil. The wood is used as fuel-wood, for charcoal burning
and in construction works. Alder saplings collected from nursery or wild forest are planted
in a jhum field located in hills above 1000 m.
The Konyak tribes in Nagaland also have sound ecosystem knowledge which they use in
their shifting cultivation practices. In the Konyak Jhum fields about 42 species could be seen;
rice and colocasia being the dominant ones. They have a sound knowledge of mixing rice
and colocasia by which the sloppy land is covered under vegetation for a greater part of the
year i.e. from April to December. Mixed cropping of rice and colocasia is also practiced by
Garo and Khasi tribes of Meghalaya and they cultivate colocasia as a supplementary crop.
But, Konyaks grow both the crops as their main crop to meet their food requirements. The
Konyaks have a good sense of fallow management and aware that the leaves and twigs
falling from the trees restores the fertility of the Jhum land. They count the number of leaf
falls and believe that after seven times ‘leaf fall’ the land becomes mature enough to
cultivate. That is why they keep the fallow period as seven years and deliberately keep the
seedlings of tree species for establishment during the resting phase. They religiously protect
the jhum lands from fire during the fallow period. If some accidental fire occurs, the fallow
period is extended. This shows the great sense of ecosystem among the Konyak tribes
(Bhan, 2009).
In Khasi hills of Meghalaya, shifting cultivation is known as “Rep Syrti/Thangram”. Shifting
cultivation practices are of two types- jhumming and bun cultivation. Jhumming involves
cutting and burning of forest vegetation on sloppy lands and using the site for two to three
year for growing rice, maize, millets, beans, cassava, yam, sweet potato, ginger, chillies,
sesamum and vegetables in mixture thereafter moving to a forest site for repeating the
same process (Singh and Dhyani, 1996). At times, a single crop of rice is grown in the second
year of jhumming. In Bun cultivation, twigs and branches of forest trees species such as
Pinus kesiya, Schima wallichii, Michelia species at lower elevations, and Schima khasiana in
higher elevation along with weed biomass (Artimisia vulgaris, Crotolaria mysorensis,
Eupatorium odoratum, E. adenophorum, Imperata cylindrical, Inula capa, Lantana camera,
Micania macarantha, Panicum khasianum, Plectranthus coetsa, Rubus ellipticus, Saccharum
spontaneum, Pteridium aquilinum from the surrounding areas are kept in heaps at regular
interval in the entire area. The buns are usually 2 to 4 m long, 1 to 2 m wide and 0.15 to 0.35
m in height. They are spaced at 1 to 2 m depending on the soil depth and are covered with a
thin layer of soil in order to burn the whole biomass under anaerobic condition and finally
the biomass is slowly converted into ash. The activity is usually done during February to
March.
At present, with increase in population pressure on land resources, the Jhum cycle is getting
reduced very fast and reached at 2-4 years at present. This makes the system unstable and
lead to severe land degradation as a result of soil erosion and associated factors such as
reduction in soil organic matter, nutrients etc. Total area under shifting cultivation is highest
in Nagaland followed by Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh. In terms of percentage of the
total geographical area, Nagaland (17.06 %) and Mizoram (12.42 %) are the most severely
affected by jhum cultivation. However, there is decline in area under shifting cultivation in
most of the north eastern hill states except Nagaland (Table 1). It has declined from 1.35
million ha in 2003 to 0.85 million ha in 2005 (excluding the state of Assam).
Table 1. Area (km2) under shifting cultivation in different states of the NEH region
2005 2003
TGA
States Current Abandoned Total Current Abandoned Total Change
(km2)
Jhum Jhum 2005 Jhum Jhum 2003
Arunachal
1025.1 506.4 1531.5 1116.9 496.2 1613.1 83743 -5.06
Pradesh
Manipur 752.1 100.1 852.2 1119.5 3697.1 4816.68 22327 -82.31
Meghalaya 291.9 157.1 448.9 627.2 116.6 743.8 22429 -39.64
Mizoram 1028.5 1589.0 2617.5 1146.9 2870.4 4017.4 21081 -34.84
Nagaland 1239.1 1588.6 2827.7 1116.6 801.3 1917.9 16579 47.44
Tripura 89.3 164.8 254.1 284.9 110.4 395.3 10486 -35.71
Sikkim 0 0 0 0 0 0 7096 0
Total 4425.9 4106.1 8532.0 5412.1 8092.1 13504.2 -36.82
Source: Wasteland Atlas of India, 2010 ([Link]
Horticulture for Jhum improvement
Under the scenario of climate change and gradual degradation of natural resources
including lesser per capita availability of land, there has been an urgent need for location-
specific measures to conserve, utilize and manage these resources for optimizing production
on sustainable basis without adversely affecting its quality. The age old practices of Bari
(Backyard farming) system in Assam, Zabo system in Nagaland and Apatani system in
Arunachal Pradesh are some of the glaring examples of effective utilization of the bio-
resources in farming systems mode. The wide agro-climatic variation from subtropical to
alpine provide enough scope for growing different horticultural crops with little
modification in abandoned jhum lands and existing jhum fields based on the prevailing
ecosystem. Development of horticultural based farming system in varying topography, soil
and environmental conditions, is one of the viable options. Thus, horticulture can play a
very viable option for jhum improvement and rehabilitation for ecological and economical
sustainability. Besides improving the value of the fallow or a shift towards settled
cultivation, horticulture can also provide the much needed capital with which further
intensification of lands will be undertaken in many cases.
Although, enough efforts have been made to control the soil /land degradation but desired
results are still awaited. The altitudinal, climatic, socio-ecological diversity within the region
provided enough opportunities for the cultivation of large number of forest species, cereals,
horticultural crops including fruits, vegetables, spices, flowers and large number of foliage
ornamentals in the different agro-climatic zones. NE Region has a total area of 1.37 million
ha and 11.50 million tones production of horticultural crops and contributes about 5.66%
and 4.15% of national area and production, respectively (NHB, 2015).
The region is characterized by difficult terrain, wide variability in slope and altitude, land
tenure system and cultivation practices and poor communication system making majority of
the areas in the region still inaccessible. Majority of the population is dependent on
agriculture, horticulture and allied land based activities. The agriculture production system
in the region is mostly rainfed, mono-cropped and subsistence type. The fruits grown in this
region range from tropical and sub-tropical fruits like banana, papaya, pineapple, jack fruit
and citrus to temperate fruits like apple, pear, peach, plum and even certain nut fruits. The
region has rich diversity of different vegetable crops and both indigenous tropical
vegetables and temperate vegetables are grown to a considerable extent. The major
vegetables grown in the region are brinjal, cabbage, cauliflower, okra, onion, pea, potato,
tomato, knol-khol, radish, carrot, French bean and different cucurbitaceous crops. Among
the flowering plants special mention may be made about the orchids, where about 600
species are reported to occur in the region alone. The other commercial flowers of the
region are marigold, tuberose, gladiolus and chrysanthemum. Tuber and rhizomatous crops
like tapioca (cassava), sweet potato, Dioscorea, colocasia, ginger and turmeric grow
abundantly in the region, while plantation crops like tea, coconut, areca nut, cashew nut
have considerable impact on the economy of the tropical and sub-tropical parts of the
region. Later on other plantation crops like rubber and coffee, medicinal and aromatic oil
yielding plants like Solanum spp., Dioscorea spp., Cymbopogon spp., Citrunella spp. etc. have
been considered suitable for certain areas of the region (Deka et al., 2016).
Apart from these, there are certain underutilized or lesser-known horticultural crops, which
are grown at large scale in some or other parts of the region by tribals. These underutilized
crops include passion fruit, kiwi fruit, chow-chow, parkia, sweet gourd (kakrol) etc. These
crops are grown in such a large scale that they are not only consumed by tribal / people of
the region but are also exported outside the region.
Potential horticultural crops for NEH Region
Pineapple, Khasi mandarin, Banana, Passion fruits, Assam lemon,
Fruits
Peach, Guava, Kiwi
Colocasia, Chow-chow, Tapioca, Potato, Pea, French bean
Vegetables
Cabbage, Onion etc.
Gladioli, Roses, Lillium, Carnation, Gerbera, Orchids,
Flowers
Chrysanthemum, Anthurium , Foliage plants
Spices Ginger, Large cardamom, Turmeric, King chilli, Black pepper
Medicinal & Aromatic
Patchouli, Neem, Agar, Aloe-vera, Garcinia and Ginseng
plants
Plantation crops Arecanut, Coconut and Cashew
Selection of crops across the elevation
The different horticultural crops can be grown in different altitudes based on their climatic
requirements in jhum or degraded lands.
Altitude (above msl) Suitable crops
Apple, Peach, Pear, Plum, Apricot, Kiwifruit, Strawberry,
High hills (900 – 2000 m)
Potato, Colocasia, Cabbage, Cauliflower, Radish, Beans, etc.
Citrus, Banana, Pineapple, Papaya, Guava, Ginger, Turmeric,
Mid hills (below 800 m) Chilli, Brinjal, Tomato, Bean, Sweet potato, Tapioca, Colocasia,
etc.
Foot hills Jackfruit, Arecanut, Cashew nut, Coconut, Black pepper, etc.
3. Silvi-horticultural system
The total area of Silvi-horticultural system was 3.13 ha with a forest land of 2.17 ha and
planned land use of 0.96 ha of which 0.50 ha area was kept for system study. The average
slope of the area was 53.18%. Lower terraces covering an area of 490 m2 was utilized for
growing spices and vegetables like turmeric +bottle gourd, turmeric + pumpkin and turmeric
alone. The middle portion of the system was utilized for fruit crops such as guava. Upper
portion of the system was covered with the forest tree spp. Alnus nepalensis. A gross
income of Rs. 34,400.00 was recorded from this system (Anon., 2016).
4. Arecanut/ palms based farming system
Due to its height, crown shape and wide spacing, areca nut (Areca catechu) is amenable to
intercropping with annual, biennial and perennial crops. Banana, black pepper, pineapple,
tapioca, turmeric and ginger are grown successfully in the under storey of areca nut. In
areca nut and palm nurseries, banana is also grown to provide shade to the seedlings. In
intercrops with black pepper, areca palms of more than 10 years of age and 7-8 m tall serve
as standard. This is very popular in homestead gardens mainly in valleys up to 400 m above
mean sea level elevation.
Palms provide more than one economic products and can be considered as multipurpose.
Leaves or petioles of palm are used as thatching, making hats, mats, baskets, ropes etc.
Stems are used as pillars in construction of houses. Inflorescence and flowers are used for
preparation of beverage. Fruits are edible. Palms are common in mixed small farming
system. By virtue of canopy architecture, tree multiple economic / commercial products and
their diverse uses, palms have immense potential in agroforestry system as a woody
component. Techniques have been developed to cultivate hybrid napier under coconut
based hortipasture system. The yield reduction in hybrid napier was observed up to 2.5 m
distance from the base of the coconut plant.
5. Alder based FS
The main crop during the first year is usually upland rice in warmer areas and job’s tear in
cooler high altitude regions. Earlier the upper Konyaks, Chang, Yimchunger and Khiamungan
tribes of Nagaland were using Chinopods and Amaranthus spp. as main crops in higher
altitude ranges and later those were changed over by upland rice, job’s tear and maize along
with varieties of secondary crops being sporadically inter planted. It is recorded that as
many as 45 crop species are grown in a single jhum field in Chujuyimlang in Mokokchung
district. Many wild vegetables and fruit bearing plants, which are grown naturally, are also
conserved in the fields. Plants for domestic requirement, such as Livistona jenkinsiana
(thatching material, palm), various bamboos, Caryota sp., perennial vegetable crops and
fruits, medicinal and ornamental plants are also grown and conserved in the jhum fields,
which lead to form a multistoried AFS.
One of the objectives of NEPED-II (Nagaland Empowerment of Poor through Economic
Development Project) was to introduce shade loving cash crops to be grown under trees for
value added agriculture. Almost six years after the introduction of trees as additional crop in
jhum fields, shade loving crops can be grown under the trees. Today Nagaland is providing
cash crops like cardamom, ginger, passion fruit, black pepper and turmeric (Table 3).
The indigenous tribes used to collect large cardamom from natural forests, later on these
were domesticated and now it has become the major plantation crop of the region. Among
30 shade tree species found in large cardamom plantation, alder is most abundant. Farmers
have evolved a classical tree cutting schedule in plantation area to get continuous supply of
fuel wood and fodder without affecting the shade requirement of large cardamom plants. It
helps in preventing lifting of long large cardamom clumps by thick old roots; otherwise
productivity of cardamom is affected. This is an economically viable and export potential
system, which has great potential in farming systems of NEH region.
Passion fruit, a new introduction in the region, is grown under partial shade and has
normally two harvesting seasons in a year. The first harvest is done in the month of May-
June and continues up to Oct-Nov. The yield of passion fruit varies depending upon the age
of the vine and the method of cultivation. Fruiting generally starts from second year and
goes on increasing until the fourth year or more, provided pruning and manuring is done on
time. Usually, a single plant yield 7-30 kg up to the fourth year.
Table 3. The details of under storey crops.
Seed/
Time of Elevatio Degree of
planting Spacing Best suited Yield
Crops sowing/ n shade
material (m) soil (q/ha)
planting (m) required
used
Cardamom Rhizomes April- 600- 1.5 x 1.5 Loamy soil 10-15 50-75%
and May 1900
suckers
Betel vine Cuttings May- 200-800 Dependin Clay to loamy 10-15 50-75%
of June g on soil
runners support
trees.
Black Cuttings May- 200-800 Dependin Clay to loamy 10-15 50-75%
pepper of runner June g on soil
shoots. support
trees.
Passion Seed and April- 600- 4.5 x 6.0 All types of 45-50 25%
fruit vine May 2000 soil
cuttings
Turmeric Rhizomes March- 200- 0.45 x 0.3 Loamy with 140-320 10-25%
April 1600 rich organic
matters
Ginger Rhizomes March- 200- 0.45 x 0.3 Sandy soil 100 10-25%
April 1600 with rich
organic
matters
The perishability of fruits possess special problem, though attractive markets make it
worthwhile especially if the appropriate infrastructure can be put into place.
3. Extension System
Role specificity of extension system in promotion of horticultural crops has remained
unattended because of skewed primacy of food grain by extension workers. Some of the
crucial inadequacies identified include:
Extremely weak horticulture extension system due to lack of extension
professionalism as well as lack of trained manpower.
Lack of linkage, coherency and co-ordination among different extension agencies.
Lack of centers of capacity building for farmer on advanced/ modern practices.
Lack of mobility of the field functionaries of line departments.
Low budgetary allocation on TOT of horticultural crops.
4. Land use planning and development strategies
The ideal alternative to jhum on hill slopes requires a total change of cultivation practice.
Plantation and horticultural crops must be simultaneously cultivated with forestry species to
ensure permanent plant cover. Cereal crops should be confined to the valleys. Two factors,
however, make this an unrealistic prospect in the near future. First, the isolation caused by
topographical distance from urban centres cannot be countered except through extensive
networks of roads. Importing cereals into the region on a large scale to compensate for
reduced local production thus is not feasible. Second, social and cultural changes have to
take place before such a system will be adopted. For immediate future, an improved jhum
cycle must be the focus of development.
The north eastern hill region can support a variety of tropical and temperate fruit trees
besides plantation crops such as tea, coffee and rubber. Planting suitable crops on a
cooperative basis among a number of contiguous villages in an area of 100-200 ha with each
family in a village being a unit, will ensure continued independence of family units, promote
economic viability and reduce the pressure on the land from jhum.
Conclusion
Although the region is very rich with respect to natural resources and biodiversity but their
exploitation and extraction with poor replenishment has become a point of concern for
their sustainability. The large scale interference due to shifting cultivation and increased
population pressure has enhanced the process of degradation. Development of horticultural
based farming system in varying topography, soil and environmental conditions, is the need
of the hour. While devising any such programmes, social, economic and cultural traditions
of the jhumias have to be introspected. Moreover, priority should be given to techniques
and practices that can enhance production and productivity with regular income at farm
level. Besides improving the value of the fallow or a shift towards settled cultivation,
horticulture has also provided the much needed capital with which further intensification of
lands can be undertaken. Horticulture can play a pivotal role for jhum improvement and
rehabilitation for ecological and economical sustainability.
Development packages must be specially designed for a given cluster of villages, taking into
consideration the microenvironment and the socioeconomic condition and cultural
background of the people. The aspiration of the tribal people are unique because of their
independent nature and closeness to the forest ecosystem, provisions to protect these
unique characters need to be established during the planning process. Scientists, planners
and administrators often have tried to impose plans for development that they consider
good for the people in the region without trying to understand the process that operate in
the traditional ecosystems. Rather, the strategy for development should be one with which
the people themselves can identify. Traditional value systems should be incorporated as
much as possible rather than ignored or even undermined. Development packages of this
type not only will find ready acceptance by tribal societies but also will ensure participation
of the people in the development processes.
References
Anonymous. 2010. Annual Report (2009-10), ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region,
Umiam.
Anonymous. 2016. Annual Report (2015-16), ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region,
Umiam.
Barthakur, M. (2004). Weather and climate. In Brahmputra basin water resources. (eds.) V.P.
Singh, N. Sharma, S. Shakhar and P. Ojha. Kluwer Academic Publisher: Netharlands.
pp. 17-30.
Bhan, S. 2009. A case study on shifting cultivation practices in Mon district of Nagaland.
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 8(2): 8-13
Datta, M., Das, A. and Ngachan, S. V. 2012. Innovations in Agroforestry based Farming
System for Sustainable Land Use and Rural Livelihood in Tripura. In: Innovations in
Integrated Farming System for Livelihood Improvement. Book of Extended
Summaries of the National Seminar On Livelihood Options for Small and Marginal
Farmers Livelihood Options for Small and Marginal Farmers in Fragile Ecosystems, 9-
10th August, 2012. pp 58-64.
Deka, B.C., Rymbai, H., Deshmukh, N.A. and Talang, H.D. 2016. Horticulture based Farming
System: The Engine for Prosperity in Northeast India. Souvenir cum Invited Paper
Abstract of the Platinum Jubilee of HIS, the 7th Indian Horticulture Congress,
Doubling Farmers Income through Horticulture, New Delhi, November 15-18th, 2016
pp. 264-265.
Hore, D. K. 2006. Potential of minor forest produce and other economic plants in socio-
economic development of NER. In. North East Emerging Horizons in
Agribusiness (eds. Akali Sema, Amod Sharma, [Link] and Imti Naro L.). Published by
Seminar Organizing Committee N.E. Agri Expo 2006.pp125-139.
Jha, A.K., Verma, V.K., Deshmukh, N.A., Rymbai, H., Assumi, S.R., Devi, M. B. and Talang,
H.D. 2017. Spices for income enhancement in NE Region: Needs and focus. (in)
Theme 4: Horticulture for Nutrition and Assured Income. National Seminar on ‘Smart
Farming for Enhancing Input Use efficiency, Income and Environmental Security’
organized by Indian Association of Hill Farming in collaboration with ICAR Research
Complex for NEH Region during 19th -21st September 2017. Pp 109-118.
Maithani, B.P. 2005. Shifting cultivation in the North-East India: Policy Issues and Options.
Mittal Publications, New Delhi. 179 p.
Ramakrishnan, P.S. 1992. Shifting agriculture and sustainable development: An
interdisciplinary study from North-Eastern India. UNESCO-MAB series, Paris,
Parthenon Publications, Cornforth, Lancs, UK.424p.
Rathore, S.S., Karunakaran, K. and Prakash, B. 2010. Alder based farming system, a
traditional farming system in Nagaland for amelioration of Jhum land. Indian Journal
of Traditional Knowledge 9(4): 677-680.
Singh, B.P. and Dhyani, S.K. 1996. An appraisal of indigenous landuse systems in Meghalaya
for developing sustainable rainfed hill agriculture. In. Proceedings IUFRO-DNAES
International Meet on Resource Inventory Techniques to support Agroforestry and
Environemntal activities. Eds. R.K. Kohli and K.S. Arya. DNAES, Chandigarh. Oct 1-3,
1996. Pp. 61-72.
Singh, J. S. and Singh, S. P. 1992. Forests of Himalaya, Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, p.
294.
Singh, A and Singh, M.D. 1981. Effect of various stages of shifting cultivation on soil erosion
from steep hill slopes. Indian Forester 106(2): 115–121.
India’s North Eastern Region consists of eight states–Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur,
Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, and Tripura–occupying 262,179 square kilometres
and with a population of over 45.58 million (Census 2011) which is 3.77% of India’s
population. The North Eastern Region is socially, culturally, and politically very complex and
contains great environmental and natural resource diversity. More than 200 dominant
tribes and many sub-tribes reflect the complex social structure of the region. Agriculture is
the mainstay of the economy of northeast India, where more than 80 percent of the total
population is rural. Jhum (shifting) cultivation is the predominant land use system in the hilly
states of the region. A lack of enterprise and the decline in local income generation in the
once fairly self-sufficient villages resulted in large-scale migration of young people to cities
and other urban areas, including outside the region. Consequently, the decline in the
number of young people in the villages makes it more difficult to meet the labor-intensive
requirements of most agricultural practices in the hilly regions. Further, poor market access
and lack of opportunities for value addition for cash crops and locally abundant horticultural
crops hinder the tapping of alternative sources of income.
Natural resources
In terms of its natural resources, the region is identified as one of the world’s biodiversity
hotspots, with species-rich tropical rainforests supporting diverse flora and fauna, and is the
center of origin of several species, including citrus, cereals, and orchids. The North Eastern
Region has abundant water resources accounting for 34% of the country’s water resources
and almost 40% of India’s hydropower potential. One-third of India’s runoff flows from the
Northeast through the Brahmaputra and Barak rivers. The abundant surface water resource
imposes severe distress and costs on the region through frequent flooding and erosive
processes. The region also has a substantial unutilized groundwater resource. The total
forest cover in the region 171,964 sq km which is 65.59 percent of its total geographical
area (TGA) in comparison to national forest cover of 21.34%. Recent assessment (ISFR,
2015) shows a decrease of forest cover to the extent of 628 sq km (0.37%) in the NE region.
The reason behind such decrease is attributed to the biotic pressure and shifting cultivation
in the region. State wise forest cover along with the changes as compared to previous
assessment (2013) is given in Table 1. The quality of land in the region is favourable for a
wider range of crops livestock-forestry-fishery activities. Furthermore, there are large
reserves of petroleum and gas in the region, which constitute a fifth of the country’s total
potential. Industrial raw materials such as coal, hydrocarbons, and mineral resources,
including thorium and limestone, are also abundantly available
field for soil application is less and therefore, farmers need to be motivated for
collection of biomass from adjoining forests. Integrated farming system (IFS) is a
production system being followed in the entire north east and livestock/birds
component of IFS may serve as an important source of manures for jhum fields.
Motivation of farmers to dig compost pit adjacent to jhum field for utilization of biomass
from crop and non-crop areas for production of manures should be given due
importance.
Replacing slash-and-burn with slash-and-char can improve the quality of Jhum field
soils (Hazarika, 2014). Slash-and-char is a carbon and nutrient conserving alternative to
existing slash-and-burn technique. Carbon will rather be retained in the system
compared to slash-and-burn, since only biomass from the same cropping area will be
used for producing the charcoal. A global analysis revealed that up to 12% of the total
anthropogenic C missions by land use change (0.21 Pg C) can be off-set annually in soil, if
slash and burn is replaced by slash and char. The production of charcoal for soil
amelioration purposes could establish a C sink and could be an important step towards
sustainability and soil organic matter conservation in jhum agriculture. To popularize the
slash-and-char practice among the hill farmers of North East, research focus and policy
initiatives on popularizing low-cost biochar production technologies is urgently needed.
The shifting cultivation adversely affects soil fertility of jhum fields due to soil erosion,
loss of organic matter and leaching of plant nutrients. Studies on steep slopes (44–53 %)
have indicated soil loss to the tune of 40.9 t/ha, and corresponding nutrient losses per
ha are 702.9 kg of organic carbon, 63.5 kg of P and 5.9 kg of K (Ram and Singh 1993). The
soil loss from hill slopes (60–79 %) under first year, second year and abandoned jhum
was estimated to be 147, 170 and 30 t/ha/year, respectively. Soil loss can be suitably
minimized through adoption of soil conservation measures such as contour trenches,
contour bunds, vegetative bunds, grass water ways etc. Introduction of leguminous
cover crops in current jhum field will minimize soil loss, improve soil health, suppress
weed, provide food to human and feed to animal besides adding cash incomes. Bio-
terracing of jhum field with fast growing hedgerow species like Tephrosia candida,
Crotalaria tetragona, Crotalaria juncea, Indigofera tinctoria, Flemingia macrophylla and
Cajanus cajan has scope for minimizing soil loss and improving the productivity of the
soil of current jhum fields. Hedgerows alone abridged soil loss by 94% and runoff by 78
106 ICAR RESEARCH COMPLEX FOR NEH REGION, UMIAM, MEGHALAYA
JHUM IMPROVEMENT FOR SUSTAINING FARM LIVELIHOOD AND NATURAL RESOURCE
CONSERVATION IN NORTH EASTERN HILL REGION : VISTAS AND FRONTIERS
%. Use of twigs and tender stems of hedge plants as mulch conserved ~83% of soil and
42% of rains water. In an experimental trial conducted at Changki, Nagaland, soil loss
was abridged by 22% with integration of hedgerow species in jhum plots as compared to
traditional jhum site (38.1 t/ha/year). Therefore, contour hedgerow technology provides
an alternative farming on hill slopes on a sustainable basis. Alegre et al. (1996) reported
that combined use of earthworm inoculation and organic inputs is an efficient way to
improve the fertility of jhum fields.
Crops in jhum field suffers from severe moisture stress particularly during winter months
that drastically reduce the productivity of the crops. Despite having heavy monsoon
rainfall in North east region, there is acute shortage of water in winter months. The
geological formation does not permit water retention; run-off is quick and springs and
small streams dry up when there is no rain. In order to improve the jhum productivity,
water/moisture conservation options suitable for sloppy land need to be explored.
Construction of low cost micro water harvesting structures with minimum seepage and
evaporative losses (Jalkund 30,000 l capacity) depending on availability of suitable space
in sloppy land will be a viable option for life saving irrigation of crops. Harnessing
perennial spring water, if available near jhum field, through diversion channels hold
promise to overcome the water scarecity problem in jhum fields. In-situ conservation of
soil moisture through organic mulch may be one of the ideal options. Forest biomass of
adjoining jhum field may provide source of availability of organic mulch. Vegetative
barrier with hedge row species in jhum field may provide alternative source of biomass
for organic mulch.
Adoption of Alder based jhum system, wherever possible, should be encouraged
because it is an outstanding model of sustainable land use system for hilly ecosystem
evolved through numerous years of testing. Alder based jhum fields are managed
typically in four year cycles, with two years of cropping between the alder trees fallowed
by two more years while the soil is rested and the coppices allowed to grow.
Abandoned jhum lands situation:
The declining productivity of jhum lands is the main threat for sustainability of shifting
cultivation. One of the main reasons for rotation of land in shifting cultivation is exhaustion
of soil fertility and search for new fertile land. To make the abandoned jhum lands fertile
and less prone to soil erosion, following intervention can be made for its improvement for
sustainable agriculture.
Adoption of soil fertility restoration measures through recommended practices viz.
cover cropping, introduction of legume in cropping system, carbon management
through manure/compost application, green manuring etc.
Adoption of suitable crops and cropping sequence for soil improvement. Raising of close
growing crops like grasses and good canopy-producing crops like legumes controls soil
erosion and improves soil structure due to good canopy, higher root mass and root
secretions helping in binding soil particles. Cropping sequences that provide early and
continuous ground cover permit less erosion. A suitable cover crop such as pigeon pea
(Cajanus cajan), stylo (Stylosanthes guianensis) and velvet beans (Psophocarpus
palustris) used in crop rotation helps to improve soil properties.
Nutrient management through conventional sources of nutrients (organic manure,
green manure, crop residue, compost etc) should be given due emphasis since the
farmers are reluctant to use chemical fertilizers.
The SALT approach (Sloping Agriculture Land Technology) when suitably adapted to the
local conditions has the potential to offer the hill tribes with an alternative method of
agriculture, which while being climate smart, will also provide the farmers with a means
of sustainable livelihoods.
Soil and water conservation through adoption of site specific land use systems viz.
horticultural based land use system, horti-silviculture based land use system, agri-horti-
silvi-pastoral land use system, agro-forestry based land use system etc. Agroforestry has
been a long-standing custom in the region, where cereals, rhizomes, pineapple, coffee,
tea, spices and vegetable crops are grown along with fruits and other trees such as pine,
pear, plum, areca nut, mandarin, guava, coconut, jackfruit, banana and large cardamom
with alder trees.
Adoption of soil and water conservation measures through bio-terracing, contour
trances, vegetative bunds etc.
Terracing of hills with abandoned jhum land. Creation of micro water harvesting
structures in steep hill slope of jhum fields is difficult for rain water harvesting. Terracing
not only helps in reducing hill slopes but also provide platform for creation of micro
water harvesting structures. Terraced land could be used for planting commercial crops
like tea, rubber etc. Terracing of hill is a costly affair and so concerned government
should introduce land use policy for terracing of jhum lands for enhancing agricultural
productivity and livelihood security. For example Government of Mizoram has
introduced New Land Use Policy (NLUP) for conversion of hill slopes in to terraces.
Development of the abandoned jhum land following watershed approach.
Conclusion
As the jhum system has cultural linkages with the traditional communities, improvement of
jhum is the only option left out with the researchers and developmental workers for
motivating people to mitigate the ecological degradation of the production system.
Literature cited
Alegre et al. (1996). Dynamics of soil physical properties in Amazonian agroecosystems
inoculated with earthworms. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60(5): 1522-
1529.
Hazarika, S. (2014). Abstract of National Seminar on Shifting Cultivation (Jhum) in the 21st
Century: Fitness and Improvement November 28-29, 2014 at CPGS, CAU, Umiam,
Meghalaya, India
ISFR (2015). Indian State of Forest Report 2015 published by Forest Survey of India, Ministry
of Environment & Forests, GOI, New Delhi.
Ram and Singh 1993. Ram, Munna and Singh, B.P. (1993). Soil fertility management in
farming systems. Lecture notes. Off-campus training on farming system, Aizawl. 5-7
October, pp. 46-50.
AUTHOR INDEX