Research Methodology
Research Methodology
Introduction
2. Diligence:- Being a machine, a computer does not suffer from the human
traits of tiredness and lack of concentration. If two million calculations have to be
performed, itwill perform the two million calculations with exactly the same
accuracy and speed as the first.
3. Accuracy:- The computer’s accuracy is consistently high. Errors may occur
very rarelybut it can detected very easily. The errors are due to the imprecise
thinking by the programmer or due to in accurate poorly designed systems.
5. Binary Digits:- Computers use only the binary number system ( a system in
which all numbers are represented by a combination of two digits- one and zero)
and thus operates to the base of two compared to the ordinary decimal arithmetic
which operates on a base of ten.
6. Storage:- Although the storage capacity of the present day computer is much
more than its earlier counterpart but even then the internal memory of the CPU is
only large enough to retain a certain amount of information just as the human brain
selects and retains what it feels to be important and regulates unimportant deatails to
the back of the mind or just forgets them. Hence it is impossible to store all types of
information inside the computer records. If need be all unimportant
information/data can be stored in auxiliary storage devices and the same may be
brought into the main internalmemory of the computer as and when required for
processing.
Computers and Researchers
Performing calculations almost at the speed of light, the computer has become
one of the most useful research tools in modern times. Computers are ideally suited
for data analysis concerning large research projects. Researchers are essentially
concerned with huge storage of data, their faster retrieval when required and
processing of data with the aid of various techniques. In all these operations,
computers are of great help. Their use, apart expediting the research work, has
reduced human drudgery and added to the quality of research activity.
Techniques involving trial and error process are quite frequently employed in
research methodology. This involves lot of calculations and work of repetitive
nature. Computer is best suited for such techniques, thus reducing the drudgery of
researchers onthe one hand and producing the final result rapidly on the other.
Thus, different scenarios are made available to researchers by computers is no time
which otherwise might have taken days or even months.
The storage facility which the computers provide is of immense help to a
researcher for he can make use of stored up data whenever he requires to do so.
Thus, computers do facilitate the research work. Innumerable data can be
processed and analysed with greater ease and speed. Moreover, the results obtained
are generally correct and reliable. Not only this, even the design, pictorical
graphing and report are being developed with the help of computers. Hence,
researchers should be given computer education and be trained in the line
so that they can use computers for their research work.
In spite of all this sophistication we should not forget that basically
computers are machines that only compute, they do not think. The human brain
remains supreme and will continue to be so for all times. As such, researchers
should be fully aware about the following limitations of computer-based
analysis:
2. Various items of detail which are not being specifically fed to computer may
get lost sight of.
3. The computer does not think; it can only execute the instructions of a
thinking person. If poor data of faulty programs are introduced into the
computer, the data analysis would not be worthwhile. The expression
“garbage in, garbage out” describes this limitations very well.
Identify the general area of interest: Start by identifying the general area of research
that interests you.
Define the specific problem: Narrow down the general area of interest to a specific
problem or issue.
Explain the significance of the problem: Provide context for the problem by
explaining why it is important to study and what gap in current knowledge or
understanding it fills.
Provide a clear and concise statement: State the problem in a clear and concise
manner, making sure to use language that is easily understood by your intended
audience.
Use a scientific and objective tone: The problem statement should be written in a
neutral and objective tone, avoiding any subjective language and personal bias.
1. Clarity
The problem statement should be clear and easy to understand. Write it in a way that is
accessible to both experts and non-experts in the field.
2. Specificity
The statement should be specific and clearly define the problem or issue that the research
project aims to address. It should be narrow enough to be manageable, but broad enough to
be of interest to others in the field.
3. Significance
The statement should explain why the problem is important and what gap in current
knowledge or understanding it fills. It should provide context for the research project and
help to justify its importance.
4. Relevance
The statement should be relevant to the field of study and address an issue that is currently
of concern to researchers.
5. Research questions
The statement should include a set of research questions that the research project aims to
answer in order to address the problem or issue.
6. Research objectives
The statement should include a set of specific and measurable objectives that the research
project aims to achieve.
7. Scope
The statement should define the specific population, setting, or context that the research
project will focus on.
8. Theoretical framework
The statement should provide an overview of the theoretical concepts and principles that
inform the research project.
9. Research design
The statement should provide an overview of the research methodologies. This will be
useful collect and analyze data in order to address the research questions and objectives.
HYPOTHESIS
When a researcher observes known facts and takes up a problem for analysis, he
first has to start somewhere and this point of starting is Hypothesis. In other words, one
has to proceed to formulate tentative solution. This purposed solutions constitute the
Hypothesis. The collection of facts (data) will be fruitful if they are either for or against
this proposed solution. The tentative explanation or solutions are the very basis for
research process.
Definition
1. In the words of George A. Lund Burg " a hypothesis is a tentative generalization the
validity of which remains to be tested………In its most elementary stage the
hypothesis may be very bunch, guess, imaginative data, which becomes the basis for
action or investigation".
2. Goode and Hatt defined it as " a proposition which can be put to test to determined
its validity".
3. Rummel " a hypothesis is a statement capable of being tested and there by verified or
rejected".
Need (importance) of Hypothesis
In all analytical and experimental studies hypothesis should be set up in order to
give a proper direction to them. Hypothesis are useful and the guide Research Process in
proper directions. In addition to put in the theory to test, a hypothesis has to perform
certain other functions.
In many ways it is a guiding print to research. Young says "Formulation of
hypothesis gives definite the point of enquiry aids in establishing direction in which to
proceed and help to delimit the field of enquiry".
The use of hypothesis prevents a blind search and indiscriminate gathering of data
which may later prove irrelevant to the problem under study.
In the data collection hypothesis serves as the forerunner.
A Researcher based on hypothesis can save a lot of time and keep the researcher
from considerable amount of confusion.
Hypothesis is helpful in directing the researcher to find out order among facts.
Hypothesis have also certain practical values to society besides serving as a
means for seeking solution to various problems, they help in understanding the social
phenomena in theproper perspective.
Sources of Hypothesis
Hypothesis can be derived from various sources.
1. Theory
This is one of the main sources of hypothesis. It gives direction to research by
stating what is known. Logical deduction from theory leads to new hypothesis.
2. Observation
Hypothesis can be derived from observation. For example, from observation of
price behaviour in a market the relationship between price and demand of an article can
be hypothesised.
3. Analogies
Analogies are another sources of hypothesis. Julian Hexley has pointed out that
causal observation in nature or in the framework of another science may be a fertile
source of Hypothesis.
4. Intuition and personal experiences
Intuition and personal experiences may also contribute to the formulation of
hypothesis. Personal life and experience of person determine their perception and
conception these may, in term direct a person to certain hypothesis more quickly. The
story Newton and falling apple, the flash of wisdom to Sree Buddha under Banyan tree
Illustrate this accidental process.
5. Findings and Studies
Hypothesis may be developed out of the findings of other studies in order to
repeat the test.
6. Culture
Another source of hypothesis is the culture in which the researcher is nurtured For
example sociology as an academic discipline originated from western culture Over the
past decade a large part of the hypothesis on American society examine by researchers
were connected with violence. Indian society is caste-ridden riddled with inequalities and
privileges.
Characteristics of a Good hypothesis
What is a good hypothesis? What are the criteria of for judging it. An
acceptable should fulfillcertain conditions.
1. Conceptual Clarity
A hypothesis should be conceptually clear. It should consist of clearly defined
andunderstandable concepts
2. Specificity
A hypothesis should be specific and explain the expected relation between
variables and the conditions under which these relations will hold.
3. Testability
A hypothesis should be testable and should not be a moral judgement. It should be
possible to collect empirical evidences to test techniques.
4. Availability of techniques
Hypothesis should be related to available techniques. Otherwise they will not be
researchable therefore the research must make sure that methods are available for testing
his proposed hypothesis.
5. Consistency
Hypothesis should be logically consistent. The propositions derived should not be
contradictory
6. Objectivity
Scientific hypothesis should be free from value judgment. The researcher system
of values has no placing Research.
7. Simplicity
A hypothesis should be as simple as possible.
Simplicity demands insight. The more in insight the researcher has into a problem, the
simpler will be his hypothesis. Types of Hypothesis
1. Descriptive Hypothesis
These are propositions, they described the characteristics of a variable. The
variable may be an object, person, organisation, situation or event. For ex. "The rate of
unemployment among arts graduates is higher than that of commerce graduates".
2. Relational Hypothesis
These are propositions which describe the relationship b/w two variables. The
relation suggested many be positive or negative for ex. 'Families with higher income
spent more for recreation'. 'Upper class people have more children than lower class
people'.
3. Causal Hypothesis
Causal Hypothesis states that the existence of, or a change in, one variable causes
for leads to an effect on other variable. The 1st variables is called independent variable
later the dependent variable.
4. Common Sense Hypothesis
These represent the commonsense ideas. They state the existence of empirical
uniformities received through day to day observations.
5. Analytical Hypothesis
These are concerned with the relationship of analytic
variables. These hypothesis occurs and the higher level of abstraction.
6. Null Hypothesis
Null means 'Zero' When a hypothesis is stated negatively. It is called Null
Hypothesis. The object of this hypothesis is to avoid the personal bias of the investigator.
In the matter of collection of data. A null hypothesis is used to collect additional support
for the known hypothesis.
7. False Hypothesis
A hypothesis which is bound to be unsatisfactory when verified is called a false
hypothesis.
8. Barren Hypothesis
A hypothesis from which no consequences can be deducted is called a Barren
Hypothesis. It is a hypothesis which cannot to test. Ex. The child fell ill because a wicked
women's eye felt upon it.This is a baseless hypothesis because it cannot be verify.
Testing of Hypothesis
Science does not admit anything as valid knowledge until satisfactory test confirm
the validity. A hypothesis should be subjected to regrets test and. Type I and Type II
errors should be eliminated.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Meaning
"A Research Design is the logical and systematic planning in directing the
research. The design research from translating a general scientific model into varied
research
problem. But in practices in most of the basis it is just a plan of study. The research
design can either be formal or informal.
Definition
1. "It constitutes the blue print for the collection, measurement and analysis of data" -
PhilipsBernard S
2. It "provides a systematic plan of procedure for the researcher to follow" -Best John
N
3. "The design research from controlling general scientific model into varied
researchprocedure"- P.V. Young
4. "A research design is "the programme that guides the investigator in the process of
collecting, analysis and interpreting observations". - David and Shava
A research design addressers itself to certain key issues such as:
a) What is the problem uncles study?
b) What is the major research question?
c) What is the area of the study?
d) How many people will be study?
e) How this people will be selected?
f) What methods and techniques will be used to collect data from them?
Features of Research Design
a) It is a plan that specifies the objectives of study and the hypothesis to be tested.
b) It is an outline that specifies the sources and types of information relevant to the
researchquestion.
c) It is a blueprint specifying the methods to be adopted for gathering and analysis of
data.
d) It is a scheme defining the procedure involved in a research process.
Features of a good Design
A good design has the following features.
1. Flexibility
2. Efficiency
3. Appropriate
4. Economical
5. Minimum error
6. Maximum reliability
7. Smallest experimental error
8. Maximum information Why a Research Design
1. Research Design is needed because it helps in the smooth sailing of Research
operations.
2. A Research without a pre-drawn plan is like an ocean voyage without mariners
compus.
3. The Research Design helps in providing direction our study.
4. It prevents welter in a study.
5. The use of Research Design prevents blind search.
6. A Research Design fixes clear cut boundaries to a research.
7. It makes the research systematic
8. It help us to meet unexpected events. Contents of a Research
Design
Usually a Research Design consist of the following
details
1. What is the study about?
2. Why is the study being made?
3. Where will the study be carried out?
4. What type of data is required?
5. Where can the required data be found?
6. What period of time will the studied include?
7. What will be the sample design?
8. What technique of data collection will be used?
9. How will the data we analyse?
10. In what style the report will be prepared?
By way of conclusion it can be said that research design must contain at least:
a) Statement of a problem
b) Procedure and techniques
c) Sampling frame
d) Processing and analysis of data
Types of Research Design
1. Exploratory Research Design (Formulative Research)
Exploratory Research studies are also termed as formulative research studies.
Exploratory Research is preliminary study of an in familiar problem about which the
researcher has little or no knowledge. It is similar to a doctor initial investigation of
patient suffering from an in familiar malady for getting some clues for identifying.
2. Descriptive Research Design
Descriptive study is fact finding investigation with adequate interpretation. It is
the sample type of research. It is more specific than the exploratory study. As it has focus
on particular aspects or dimensions of the problem studied. It is design to gather
descriptive informations and provides information for formulating more sophisticated
studies. Data are collected by using of appropriate methods.
3. Action Research
Action Research is a type of evaluation study. It is a concurrent evaluation study
of an action programme launched for solving a problem. Action research is otherwise
called Apply Research.
The following are the different phases in action research.
1. A base lane survey of the pre-action situation.
2. A feasibility study of the proposed action programme
3. Planning and launching the programme.
4. Concurrent evaluation of the programme
5. Making modifications and changes in the programme and its methods of
implementations in the light of research finding.
6. Final Evaluation
DATA COLLECTION
The search for answers to research questions is called collection of data. Data are
facts, and other relevant materials, past and present, serving as bases for study and
analyses. The data needed for social science research may be broadly classified into (a)
Data pertaining to human beings, (b) Data relating to organizations and (c) Data
pertaining to territorial areas.
Personal data or data related to human beings consist of
(1) Demographic and socio-economic characteristics of individuals: Age, Sex, Race,
Social class, Religion, Marital status, Education, Occupation, Income, Family size,
Location of the household, Life style, etc., (2) Behavioral Variables: Attitudes, opinions,
awareness, knowledge, practice, intentions, etc.
Organizational data consist of data relating to an organization's origin, ownership,
objectives, resources, functions, performance and growth.
Territorial data are related to geophysical characteristics, resources endowment,
population, occupational pattern, infrastructure, structure, degree of development, etc. of
spatial divisions like villages, cities taluks, districts, state and the nation.
Importance of data
The data serve as the bases or raw material for analysis.
Without an analysis of factual data, no specific inferences can be drawn on the questions
under study. Inference based on imagination or guess work cannot provide correct
answers to research questions. The relevance adequacy and reliability of data determine
the quality of the findings of a study.
Data from the basis for testing the hypotheses formulated in a study. Data also
provide the facts and figures required for constructing measurement scale and tables,
which are analyses with statistical techniques. Inferences on the results of statistical
analysis and tests of significance provide the answers to research questions. Thus, the
scientific process of measurements, analysis, testing and inferences depended on the
availability of relevant data and their accuracy. Hence, the importance of data for nay
research studies.
Sources of data
The sources of data may be classified into (a) primary sources and (b) secondary
sources.
Primary sources are original sources from which the researcher directly collects
data that have not been previously collected. Primary data are first-hand information
collected through various methods such as interviewing, mailing, observation etc.
Secondary sources containing data which have been collected and compiled for another
purpose. The secondary sources consists of readily available compendia and already
compiled statistical statements and reports whose data may be used by researches for
their studies. E.g., census reports, annual reports and financial reports. Secondary
sources consist of not only published records and reports, but also unpublished records.
Objective data and subjective data
Objective data is independent of any single person's opinion, whereas subjective
data can be an individual's opinion or it can be dependent upon the researcher.
Qualitative data and quantitative data
Qualitative data is the description of things made without assigning numeric
value. For example, facts generated from unstructured interview. It needs researcher's
interpretation.
Quantitative data entails measurements in which numbers are used directly to
represent properties of things. It is ready for statistical analysis. The larger sample is
required in quantitative data, and with proper sampling design, the ability to generalize is
also high.
Main methods of Data collection
Most research studies collect fresh data from the respondents even though already
existing data are utilized for developing the research design or supplementing the data to
be collected. There are various methods of data collection. 'Method is different from a
'Tool' while a method refers tothe way or mode of gathering data, a tool is an instrument
used for the method. For example, a schedule is used for interviewing. The important
methods are (a) observation, (b) interviewing,
(c) mail survey (D) schedule. Observations involves gathering of data relating to the
selected research by viewing and or
listening. Interviewing involves face to face conversation between the investigator and
the respondent. Mailing is used for collecting data by getting questionnaires completed by
respondents. Experimentation involves a study of independent variables under controlled
conditions. Experiments may be conducted in a laboratory or in field in a natural setting.
Simulation involves creation of an artificial situation similar to the actual life situation.
Projective methods aim at drawing inferences on the characteristics of respondents by
presenting to them stimuli. Even method has its advantages and disadvantages.
A researcher can select one or more of the methods keeping in view the above
factors. No method is universal. Each method's unique features should be compared with
the needs and conditions of the study and thus the choice of the methods should be
decided.
Observation
Observation is a basic method of getting information about the world around us.
Observation part and parcel of our daily life but many types of data required as evidence
to support social research are also obtained through the observational method. The
greatest asset of observational technique is that it is possible to record the actual
occurrence of social events. While many research technique depend mainly if not
entirely on recalling the past events, observational method yields such as are related to
real life situations. A trained researcher can even observe and record all the minor
details of a community with the help of this
technique which to others might seem insignificant.
Observation means viewing or seeing. Most of such observations are just causal
and haveno specific purpose. But observation in a method of data collection is different
from such causal viewing. Observation may be defined as a systematic viewing of a
specific phenomenon in its proper setting for the specific purpose of gathering data for a
particular study. Observation as a method includes both 'seeing' and 'hearing'. It is
accompanied by perceiving as well.
Observation is a classical method of scientific inquiry. Observation also plays a
major role in formulating and testing hypothesis in social sciences. Behavioral scientists
observe interactions in small groups; political scientists observe the behavior of political
leaders and political institutions.
Observation may serve a variety of research purposes. It can be used in
exploratory research to develop a preliminary understanding of social phenomena. It can
be applied to study real life situations as well as to conduct experimental research. Again,
it can simply be used to collect supplementary data in support of other tools of data
collection. Observation includes the most causal and uncontrolled experiences as well as
exact recording as is done in experimentation. Infact, observation is useful for studying
simpler as well as complex research problems.
Observation becomes scientific, when it (a) serves a formulated research purpose,
(b) is planned deliberately, (c) is record systematically, and (d) is subjected to
check and
controls on validity and reliability. Validity refers to the extent to which the recorder
observations accurately reflect the construct they arc intended to measure. Validity is
assessed by examining how well the observations agree with alternative measures of the
same construct. Reliability entails consistency and freedom from measurement error.
Characteristics of observation method
Observation as a method of data collection has certain characteristics.
1. It is both a physical and mental activity. The observing eye 'catches' many things
which are slighted, but attraction is focused on data that are pertinent to the given
study.
2. Observation is selective. Researcher does not observe anything and everything, but
selects the range of things to be observed on the basis of the nature, scope and
objectives of his study
3. Observation is purposive and not casual. It is made for the specific purpose of
nothing things relevant to the study.
4. It captures the natural social context in which persons' behavior occurs.
5. It grasps the significant events and occurrences that affect social relations of the
participants.
6. Observation should be exact and be based on standardized tools of research
such as observation
schedule, social-metric scale, and precision instruments, if any.
Types of observation
Observation may be classified in different ways. With reference to
investigator's role, itmay be classified into
(a) participant observation, and (b) non-participant observation, in terms of mode of
observation, it may be classified into (c) direct observation and (d) indirect observation.
With reference to the rigor of the system adopted, observation is classified into (e)
controlledobservation, and (f) uncontrolled observation.
Participant observation
In this observation, the observer is a part of the phenomena or group which is
observed and he acts as both an observer and a participant. The persons who are observed
should not be aware of the researcher's purpose. Then only their behavior will be
'natural'. The concealment of research objective and researcher's identity is justified on
the ground that it makes it possible to study certain aspects of the group's culture which
are not revealed to outsiders makes it possible to study certain aspects of the group's
culture which are not revealed to outsiders.
The advantages of participant observation are:
1. The observer can understand the emotional reactions of the observed group, and
get adeeper insight of their experiences.
The observer will be able to record context which gives
meaning to the observed behaviorand heard statements.
Disadvantages
1. The participant observer narrows his range of observation.
2. To the extent that the participant observer participates emotionally, the
objectivity is lost.
Because of the above limitations, participant observation is generally restricted to
those cases where non- participant observation is not practical.
Non-participant observation
In this method, the observer stands apart and does not participate in the
phenomenon observed. Naturally, there is no emotional involvement on the part of the
observer. This method calls for skill in recording observations in an unnoticed manner.
Direct observation
This means observation of an event personally by the observer when it takes
place. This method is flexible and allows the observer to see and record subtle aspects of
events and behavioras they occur. He can free to shift places, change the focused the
observation. A limitation of this method is that the observer's perception circuit may not
be able to cover all relevant events when the latter move quickly, resulting in the
incompleteness of the observation.
Indirect observation
This does not involve the physical presence of the
observer, and the recording is done by mechanical, photographic or electronic devices.
This method is less flexible than direct observation, but it is less biasing and less erratic
in recording accuracy. It also provides a permanent record for an analysis of different
aspects of the event.
Controlled observation
This involves standardization of observational technique and exercise of
maximum control over extrinsic and intrinsic variables by adopting experimental design
and systematically recording observations. Controlled observation is earned out either in
the laboratory or in the field. It is typified by clear and explicit decisions on what, how
and when to observe. It is primarily used for inferring causality, and testing causal
hypothesis.
Uncontrolled observation
This does not involve control over extrinsic and intrinsic variables. It is primarily
used for descriptive research. Participant observation is a typical uncontrolled one.
Planning of observation
The use of observation method requires proper planning.
First, the researcher should carefully examine the relevance of observation
method to the data needs of the selected study.
Second, he must identify the specific investigative questions which call for use of
observation method. These determine the data to be collected.
Third, he must decide the observation content, viz., specific conditions, events
and activities that have to be observed for the required data. The observation content
should include the relevant variables.
Fourth, for each variable chosen, the operational definition should be specified.
Fifth, the observation setting, the subjects to be observed, the timing and mode of
observation, recording, procedure, recording instruments to be used, and other details of
the task should be determined.
Last, observers should be selected and trained. The persons to be selected must
have sufficient concentration powers, strong memory power and untrubusive nature.
Selected persons should be imparted both theoretical and practical training.
Observation Tools and Recording Devices
Systematic observation requires the use of observation schedule (or
observationnaire), diary and various mechanical recording devices.
Schedule: The data requirements are identified by analyzing the core of the problem, the
objectives of the study, the investigative questions, hypothesis and the operational
definition of concepts and out of the data requirements, items of data to be collected
through observation are identified. A schedule is then constructed, covering those items
of data.
3. Observation is more suitable for studying subjects who are unable to articulate
meaningfully.
4. Observation is less demanding of the subjects and less biasing effect on their
conduct than does questioning.
Limitations of study
1. Observation is of no use of studying past events or activities. One has to depend
upon documents or narrations by people for studying such things.
2. It is not suitable for studying opinions and attitudes.
3. Observation poses difficulties in obtaining a representative sample.
4. Observation is a slow and expensive process. Requiring human observes and/or
costly surveillance equipments.
Interview
Interviewing is one of the prominent methods of data collection. An interview is a
face to face interaction between two individuals in which a person asks questions from
another person in order to gather information. Interview emerged as a tool of data
collection by the turn of the last century and has by now become an integral part of social
research. During earlier times, interviews were conducted more in the nature of probing
conversation. Guided by a careful observer this method was used as a powerful
instrument for obtaining information.
It involves not only conversation, but also learning from the respondent's
gestures, facial expressions and pauses,
and his environment. Interviewing requires face-to face contact or contact over telephone
and calls for interviewing skills. It is done by using a structured schedule or an unstructured
guide.
Importance of interview
Interviewing may be used either as a main method or as a supplementary one in
studies of persons. Interviewing is the only suitable method for gathering information from
illiterate or less educated respondents. It is useful for collecting a wide range of data from
factual demographic data to highly personal and intimate information relating to a person's
opinions, attitudes, and values, beliefs, past experience and future intentions. When
qualitative information is required or probingis necessary to draw out fully, and then
interviewing is required. Where the area covered for the survey is a compact, or when a
sufficient number of qualified interviews are available, personal interview is feasible.
Interview is often superior to other data- gathering methods. People are usually
more willing to talk than to write. Once rapport is established, even confidential
information may be obtained. It permits probing into the context and reasons for answers to
questions.
Interview can add flesh to statistical information. It enables the investigator to grasp
the behavioral context of the data furnished by the respondents. It permits the investigator
to seek clarifications and brings to the forefront those questions, that for one reason or
another, respondents do not want to answer.
Characteristics of interview
Interview as a method of data collection has certain characteristics.
1. The participants- the interviewer and the respondent- are strangers. Hence, the
investigator has to get him introduced to the respondent in an appropriate manner.
2. The relationship between the participants is a transitory one. It has a fixed beginning
and termination points. The interview proper is a fleeting, momentary experience for
them.
3. Interview is not a mere causal conversational exchange, but a conversation with a
specific purpose, viz., and obtaining information relevant to study.
4. Interview is a mode of obtaining verbal answers to questions put verbally.
5. The interaction between the interviewer and the respondent need not necessarily be
on a face to face basis, because interview can be conducted over the telephone also.
6. Although interview is usually a conversation between two persons, it need not be
limited to single respondent. It can also be conducted with a group of persons, such
as family members, or a group of children or a group of customers, depending on the
requirements of the study.
7. Interview is an interaction process. The interaction between the interviewer and the
respondent depends upon how they perceive each other.
Types of interview
The interviews may be classified into (a) structured or directive interview, (b)
unstructuredor non-directive interview,
(c) focused interview, and (d) clinical interview and (d) depth interview.
Structured, directive interview
This is least structured one. The interviewer encourages the respondent to talk freely
about a given topic with a minimum of promoting or guidance. In this type of interview, a
detailed pre-schedule is not used. Only a broad interview guide is used.
Focused interview
This is similar to the focused interview but with a subtle differences. While the
focused interview is concerned
with the effects of a specific experience, clinical interview is concerned with broad
underlying feelings or motivations or with the course of the individual's life experiences.
Depth interview
This is an intensive and searching interview aiming at studying the respondent's
opinion, emotions or convictions on the basis of an interview guide. This requires much
more training inter-personal skills than structured interviewing. This deliberately aims to
elicit unconscious as well extremely personal feelings and emotions.
Advantages of interview
There are several real advantages to personal interview.
First, the greatest value of this method is the depth and detail of information that
can be secured.
Second, the interviewer can do more to improve the percentage of responses and the
quality of information received than other method. He can note the conditions of the
interview situations, and adopt appropriate approaches to overcome such problems as the
respondent's unwillingness, incorrect understanding of questions, suspicion, etc.
Third, the interviewer can gather other supplemental information like economic
level, living conditions etc. Through observation of the respondent's environment.
Fourth, the interviewer can use special scoring devices, visual materials and like in
order to improve the quality of interviewing.
Fifth, the accuracy and dependability of the answers given by the respondent can
be checked by observation and probing.
Last, interview is flexible and adaptable to individual situations. Even more control
can be exercised over the interview situation.
Limitations of Interview
First, Interview is not free from limitations. Its greatest drawback is that it is costly
both in money and time.
Second, the interview results are often adversely affected by interviewer's mode of
asking questions and interactions, and incorrect recording and also be the respondents
faulty perception, faulty memory, inability to articulate etc.
Third, certain types of personal and financial information may be refused in face-to
face interviews. Such information might be supplied more willingly on mail questionnaires,
especially if they are to be unsigned.
Fourth, interview poses the problem of recording information obtained from the
respondents, no foolproof system is available. Note taking is invariably distracting to both
respondent and the interviewer and affects the thread of the conversation.
Last, interview calls for highly skilled interviewers. The availability of such
persons is limited and the training of interviewers is often a long and costly process.
Schedule
A schedule refers to set of questions related to a subject, printed or typed in a
definite order. It is a device for securing information whereby a person is asked to answer
the given set of questions.
The schedule is an important research tool which facilities the collection of data
from large, diverse and widely scattered groups of people. It can be used to collect
quantitative data as well as for secure g information of qualitative nature. In most empirical
studies the primary research tool is the schedule.
The schedule is administered by the research investigator. It is not self-
administered. In the case of the schedule, the answers are obtained from the respondent in a
face-to face situation. The responses or answers are noted down by the interviewer,
Moreover, the interviewer can act as a stimulus or can furnish on the spot clarifications to
the respondent if required. Thus, a schedule presupposes a face to face interaction
between the interviewer and the respondent. When the questions are self-administered and
require the respondent to answer all items. When the questions are self- administered and
require the respondent to answer all questions by himself it is called mailed questionnaire.
Such questions are often sent by mail/post to the respondent. Sometimes they are
distributed to a group of people who may have come to attend a conference, with the
request that they may fill it up and return the same.
Usually a schedule contains structured items. By structured is meant that questions
have fixed wording. They are also typed or printed in a definite order. Thus a particular set
of questions having exactly the same wording and sequence is administered to all the
respondents.
Important considerations in the construction of a schedule
A schedule should contain a limited number of questions. Only such questions as
are extremely important to fulfill the requirements of a study should be included. Questions
which may elicit some already known or obvious information should be deleted. Generally,
respondents do not like to devote sufficient time and energy for a long schedule.
A schedule is usually divided into several sections. Each section must contain a set
of questions related to a particular item or theme. In the light of requirement of the research
problem, some rationale must be developed to include each item or theme. Questions
relating to the same general theme must be placed together. Questions placed at the
beginning of a schedule should be such that they are able to draw the respondents complete
attention. They should be able to evoke his interest. However the opening question should
be neutral. In other words, the beginning should not contain any controversial issue as the
respondents may develop a negative orientation towards the whole questionnaire. This may
lead to tardy responses or even outright refusals.
The researcher should carefully determine the sequence of the different themes
covered in a schedule. A gradation of
themes starting from simpler ones and gradually leading to complex questions ones should
be made. There should be logical sequence of themes as well as questions. The transition
from one theme to the other should not be abrupt. Complex questions requiring serious
thinking are preferably placed somewhere in the middle of the schedule as the respondent
may develop fatigue towards the end and may not give to such questions the attention they
deserve.
A crucial aspect of a schedule relates to the formulation of questions. These should
be framed in such a way that the researcher may logically expect the answers to be
significant for his research problem. A good schedule grows from sound study of the
problem and review of literature on the subject. Every item included in the schedule must
be related to the objectives of the study. A tentative list of areas on which questions are to
be asked is drawn up. It is useful to consult knowledgeable people and conduct interviews
to arrive at greater clarity. In the beginning efforts should be made to cover as many items
as possible. Gradually the researcher may detect omissions, gaps or ambiguities. Also, he
may determine which items are most important and which are not. Any research venture
can adequately cover only a limited number of themes directly related to the research
objectives. Most of the questions should focus sharply on such important themes.
Theactual process of formulating questions requires great skill and expertise. A detailed
discussion on this aspect runs beyond the scope of this unit.
The amount of space needed for answering open ended
questions has to be determined. For example, suddenly the researcher may find that an open
ended question needs more space for the answer than has been provided in the printed
schedule. Some sort of preliminary exercise helps in assessing this requirement as well.
Telephone interviewing
the questionnaires to the potential respondents with a request to complete them at their
convenience. After a day or two he can collect the completed questionnaires from them.
Often referred to as the self-administered questionnaire method, it combines the advantages
of the personal interview and the mail survey. Alternatively, the questionnaires may be
delivered in person and the completed questionnaires may be returned by mail by the
respondents.
Attaching questionnaire to a product: A firm test- a firm test-marketing a product may
attach a questionnaire to a product and request the buyer to complete it and mail it back to
the firm. The respondent is usually rewarded by a gift or a discount coupon.
Advertising the questionnaire: The questionnaire with the instructions for completion
may be advertised on a page of magazine or in a section of newspapers. The potential
respondent completes it tears it out and mails it to the advertiser.
News-stand inserts: This method involves inserting the covering letter, questionnaire and
self-addressed reply-paid envelope into a random sample of newsstand copies of a
newspaper or magazine.
Advantages of mail surveys are:
1. They are less costly than personal interviews, as cost of mailing is the same
throughout the country, irrespective of distances.
2. They can cover extensive geographical areas.
3. Mailing is useful in contacting persons such as senior business executives who are
Difficult to reach in any other way.
4. The respondents can complete the questionnaires at their conveniences.
5. Mail surveys, being more impersonal, provide more anonymity than personal
interviews.
6. Mail survey is totally free from the interviewer bias, as there is no personal contact
between therespondents and the investigator.
7. Certain personal and economic data may be given more accurately in an unsigned
mailquestionnaire.
Disadvantages of mail surveys are:
1. The scope for mail survey is very limited in a country like India where the
percentage ofliteracy is very low.
2. The response rate of mail surveys is low. Hence, the resulting sample will not be
arepresentative one.
3. It is difficult to determine the degree of representativeness of a
sample obtained by mail.
4. The causes for inadequate and non-responses cannot be known, and no probing is
possible.
5. Information on the personal characteristics of the respondent and his
environment cannotbe secured.
Respondent may not cooperative if the mail questionnaire is long
or complex
c) Ranking questions
Questions not to be asked
SAMPLING
Sampling means selecting the group that you will actually collect data from in your research.
For example, if you are researching the opinions of students in your university, you could
survey a sample of 100 students. In statistics, sampling allows you to test a hypothesis about
the characteristics of a population.
PROBLEM FORMULATION
In Research process, the 1st and foremost step is that of selecting properly and
defining a research problem. The researchers must find the problem and formulate it so
that it becomes susceptible research like a doctor a researches must examine all the
symptoms concerning a problem before he can diagnosis correctly.
“A problem well put is half solved. This saying highlights the importance of proper
formulation of the selected problem. The primary task of Research is the collection of
relevant data and the analysis of data or finding answers to research questions.
The proper performance of this task depends upon the identification of correct data
and information required for the study. Once the problem is formulated he can execute
the other steps without any vaste of time and energy. Thus formulation is a direction
and specific focus to research effort. It helps to delimit the field of enquiry and prevent
blind research and indiscriminate gathering of data. A proper formulation help to solve
all major tasks for research like sampling, collection of data, construction of tools, plan
of analysis etc.
What is a Research Problem?
A Research problem in general refers to some difficulty
In this form of question has a number of ambiguities such as: what sort of
productivity is being refered to? With industries the same is related? With what period
of time the productivity is being talked about? In view of all such ambiguities the given
statements or the question is too much general to be amenable to analysis, Rethinking
and discussion about the problem may resulting narrowing down the question to “what
factors were responsible for the higher labour productivity of Japan’s manufacturing
Industries during the decade 1971 to 1980 relative to India’s manufacturing Industries”?
This version of the problem is definitely an improvement over its earlier versions for
the various ambiguities have been removed to the extend possible. Further rethinking
andrephrasing of the problem will become in this form.
“To what extent did labour productivity in 1971 to 1980 in Japan exceed that of
India in respect of 15 selected manufacturing Industries? What factors were responsible
for the productivity differentiates between the two countries by Industries?
With this sort of formulation, the various terms involves such as ‘labour
productivity’, ‘productivity differentials etc are explained clearly. The time period, the
need of data etc are considered in this type of formulation.
Selection of a Problem
The Research problem undertaken for study must be carefully selected the
task is a difficult one, although it may not appear to this. So in this connection
researcher can seek the help of a guide. However the research problem cannot be
borrowed. A problem must spring from the mind of researcher like a plant spring
from its seed. A research guide can only help a researcher to choose the subject. The
following paints may be observed by the researcher in selecting a research problem.
1. Descriptive Vs Analytical
Descriptive research includes Surveys or fact-finding enquiries of different
kinds. The major purpose of descriptive research description of the state of affairs as
it exist at present. The main characteristics of this method is that the researcher has
no control over the variables; He can only report what has happened or what is
happening.
In Analytical research, on the other hand the researcher has to use facts or
informationalready available & analyse this to make a critical evaluation, of the
material.
2. Applied Vs Fundamental
Research can either be applied (or action) research fundamental (or pure)
research Applied Research aims at finding a solution for an immediate problem
facing a society or an organisation whereas Fundamental Research is mainly
concerned with Generalisation and with the formulation of a theory. ‘Gathering
knowledge for knowledge’ is termed pure research. Research studies concerning
natural phenomenon, human behaviour etc are examples of Fundamental Research.
But Research aims at certain conclusion facing a concrete social problems is an
example of applied Research.
3. Qualitative Vs Quantitative
Quantitative Research is based on the measurement of quantity or amount. It
is applicable to a phenomenon that is phenomenon relating to or involving quality or
kind. Qualitative Research is specially important in the behavioural sciences were
the aim is to discover the underlying motives of human behaviour.
4. Conceptual Vs Empirical
Conceptual Research is that related to some abstract ideas for theory. It is
generally used by philosophers and thinkers to develop the new concepts or to
interpret existingones.
On the other hand Empirical Researches relie on experiments or observation
alone, often without due regard for system of theory. It is data based research
coming up with conclusions which are capable of been variable of observation and
experiment.
7. Historical Research
Historical Research is that which utilities historical
sources like documents remainsetc to study events ideas of the past including
the philosophy of persons and groups at any remote point of time
SURVEY RESEARCH
Survey is a fact finding study. It is a method of research involving collection
of data directly from a population or sample thereof at particular time. It must not be
confused with mere clerical routine of gathering and tabulating figures. It requires
expert and imaginative planning carefull analysis and rational interpretation of the
findings.
Definitions
1. Mark Abraham defines survey as “a social survey is a process by
whichQuantitative facts are collected about the social aspects of a community
composition and activities”.
d) Sampling
h) Analysis of data
i) Reporting
The Purpose of the Survey
Specific survey are conducted for specific problems or for testing the
validity of some theory or hypothesis.
1. The versatility of the survey method is its greatest strength. It is the only
practicalway to collect many types of informations from individuals, socio-
economic data, attitudes, opinions, experience and expectations.
3. The survey method is flexible to permit the use of various methods of collection
of data.
1. Survey method is primarily meant for collection of data from primary sources.
So itssuccess depends upon the willingness and co-operations of the
respondents.
DESIGN ESEARCH
Meaning
1. “It constitutes the blue print for the collection, measurement and analysis of
data” -Philips Bernard S
3. “The design research from controlling general scientific model into varied
researchprocedure”- P.V. Young
f) What methods and techniques will be used to collect data from them?
Features of Research Design
a) It is a plan that specifies the objectives of study and the hypothesis to be
tested.
1. Flexibility
2. Efficiency
3. Appropriate
4. Economical
5. Minimum error
6. Maximum reliability
7. Smallest experimental error
c) Sampling frame
d) Processing and analysis of data Types of Research Design
3. Action Research
Action Research is a type of evaluation study. It is a concurrent evaluation
study of an action programme launched for solving a problem. Action research is
otherwise calledApply Research.
6. Final Evaluation
(The Researcher can design his research depends upon the nature of the
research being conducted.)
SCALING TECHNIQUES: SCALING IN RESEARCH, MEANING OF MEASUREMENT
SCALES AND SCALING, SCALE CLASSIFICATION BASES, IMPORTANT SCALING
TECHNIQUES, SCALE CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES
Introduction
2.2 Reliability
2.3 Validity
Content validity
Criterion validity
Construct validity
■Content validity
■Criterion validity
These are two types. One indicates the success of the measuring instrument
used for predicting. The other, also called concurrent validity, is used to
estimate the present status.
■Construct validity
It is one of the most significant aspects in the development of measurement
theory and practice. It links psychometric notions and practices to theoretical
notions. It attempts to explain the variation observed on several individuals.
2.4 Practicability
Economical
Convenient
Interpretable
3. Properties of scales
Distinctive classification
Order
Equal Distance
Fixed Origin
Nominal Scale
Ordinal Scale
Interval Scale
Ratio Scale
The qualitative scale without order is called nominal scale. The nominal
scale involves classification of measure objects into various categories such as
‘Yes’ or ‘No’, ‘pass’ or ‘fail’. Numeric value is assigned to these classified
categories like house number, telephone number, and roll number of the
student. The data collected through a nominal measure scale is called nominal
data.
This is the highest level of measurement and has all the four properties of a
scale. Ratio scale represents the actual amount of variables. Ratio scales are
quantitative measures with fixed or true zero. The data obtained from ratio
scales are referred to as ratio data. Ratio is also a quantitative data that can be
measured on a numerical scale but, here the zero point is fixed and implies the
absence of what is being measured. In fact, if a scale has all the features of an
interval scale, and there is a true zero point, then it is called a ratio scale.
5. SCALING TECHNIQUES
Conventional scaling
Unconventional scaling
The conventional scales are used in the questionnaire format and are most
common. The unconventional scales are used for unconventional collection of
data through games, puzzles, etc.
Paired comparison
Rank order
Constant Sum
Example
1 Parle-G 1 Tiger
1 Parle-G 1 Tiger
1 Parle-G 1 Tiger
This scaling technique is useful when the researcher wants to compare two
or more objects. In the above example we have compared two brands over
three factors. Hence the number of comparison is three.
In the rank order scaling, respondents are presented with several objects
simultaneously and asked to order or rank them according to some criterion. It
is also termed as forced ranking scale. Unlike paired comparison, rank order
scaling technique prompts respondents to rank a given list of objects.
Example
Rank the following services in the order of importance attached by you,
while selecting a new mobile services provider. The most preferred can be
ranked 1, the next as 2 and so on. The least preferred will have the last rank.
Do not repeat the ranks.
Example
Allocate the amount you would like to spend on your birthday on the
following items, out of total amount of Rs.10000/- (Please note that total
amount allocated should be exactly Rs.10000).
For eg: The respondent may be asked to evaluate the quality of food in a
restaurant on a five point scale (1=very poor, 2=poor and 5=very good).
Eg: Please put a tick mark on the following line to indicate your preference
for fast food.
To measure the preference of an individual towards the fast food, one has to
measure the distance from the extreme left to the position where the tick mark
has been put. Higher the distance, higher would be the individual preference
for fast food. The basic assumption in this scale is that the respondents can
distinguish the fine shade in differences between the preference or attitude
which need not be the case. Further, the coding, editing and tabulation of data
generated through such a procedure is a very tedious task and the researchers
would try to avoid using it.
Eg: Please put a tick mark on the following line to indicate your preference
for fast food.
This is a slightly better version than the one discussed earlier. For eg: if a
respondent had earlier ticked between 5 and 6, it is likely that he would
remember the same and the second time, he would tick very close to where he
did earlier. This means that the difference in the two response could be
negligible.
In the Itemized rating scale, the respondents are provided with a scale that
has a number of brief descriptions associated with each of the response
categories. It is widely used in survey research. There are certain issues that
should be kept in mind while designing the itemized rating scale. These issues
are:
By using even number of categories the scale would not have a neutral
category and the respondent will be forced to choose either the positive or the
negative side of the attitude. If the odd numbers of categories are used, the
respondent has the freedom to be neutral if he wants to be so.
A balanced scale is the one which has equal number of favorable and
unfavorable categories.
Relatively important
Very unimportant
How important is price to you in buying a new car? More important than
any other factor Extremely important Important Somewhat important
Unimportant
Physical Form
There are many options that are available for the presentation of the scales.
It could be presented vertically or horizontally. The categories could be
expressed in boxes, discrete lines or as units on a continuum. They may or
may not have numbers assigned to them. The numerical values, if used, may
be positive, negative or both.
Eg: Suppose we want to measure the perception about Jet airways using a
multi-item scale.
i) Likert scale
The Likert scale is the most frequently used variations of the summated
rating scale commonly used in the studies relating to attitudes and
perceptions. Summated rating scales comprise statement that expressed either
a favorable or an unfavorable attitude toward the objective of interest on a 5
point, 7 point ot on any other numerical value. The respondents are given a
certain number of items (statements) on which they are asked to express their
degree of agreement or disagreement. Likert scale is also called a summated
scale because the scores on individual items can be added together to produce
a total score for the respondent.
Likert scale has several advantages that make it more popular. It is relatively
easy and quick to compute. Further, it is more reliable and provides more data
for a given amount of respondent’s time, as compared to other scales. The
data gathered is interval data.
Table of Content
What is Classification of Data?
Advantages of Classification of Data
What is Tabulation of Data?
Advantages of Tabulation of Data
Classification of Data vs Tabulation of Data
Difference Between Classification and Tabulation of Data
Classification of data is also used in tabular presentation and is of four types; viz.,
Geographical or Spatial Classification, Chronological or Temporal Classification,
Qualitative Classification, and Quantitative Classification.
Temporal Classification of data means to classify data based on the time period.
It means that time becomes the classifying variable in the case of temporal
classification. For example, the sale of Laptops by a manufacturer in different
years. The tabular presentation of the same can be shown as follows:
Primary data is data collected firsthand for a specific purpose, while secondary
data is data that has already been collected and published for other purposes.
Classification applies to both types, organizing them into useful categories for
analysis.
What is tabulation of data?
The skill of standing out online is needed more than ever in today's digital
world. Whether to become a young marketer or grow one's brand, it is most
important to learn digital marketing concepts. With our Digital Marketing Live
Training Program, you can do all that, right in line with what any willing student
needs. The course focuses on hands-on training in SEO, Social Media,
and Content Marketing. Build the skills to make a difference in creating
campaigns and driving accurate results. Set trends, not follow them. Enroll now
and dominate the digital world!
CHI-SQUARE TEST
The chi-square test is used to estimate how likely the observations that are
made would be, by considering the assumption of the null hypothesis as true.
Table of contents:
Chi-squared Distribution
P-Value calculation
Properties
Formula
Test of Independence
Example
Degrees of Freedom and P-Values Table
Solved Problem
FAQs
Chi-Square Distribution
When we consider, the null speculation is true, the sampling distribution of the
test statistic is called as chi-squared distribution. The chi-squared test helps
to determine whether there is a notable difference between the normal
frequencies and the observed frequencies in one or more classes or categories.
It gives the probability of independent variables.
Note: Chi-squared test is applicable only for categorical data, such as men and
women falling under the categories of Gender, Age, Height, etc.
Finding P-Value
P stands for probability here. To calculate the p-value, the chi-square test is
used in statistics. The different values of p indicates the different hypothesis
interpretation, are given below:
Also, read:
P Value
Data Handling
Population and Sample
Variance
Standard Deviation
Properties
Formula
The chi-squared test is done to check if there is any difference between the
observed value and expected value. The formula for chi-square can be written
as;
or
χ2 = ∑(Oi – Ei)2/Ei
Categories P Q R S Total
Teachers 30 40 45 35 150
So by the chi-square test formula for that particular cell in the table, we get;
Some of the exciting facts about the Chi-square test are given below:
The Chi-square statistic can only be used on numbers. We cannot use them for
data in terms of percentages, proportions, means or similar statistical contents.
Suppose, if we have 20% of 400 people, we need to convert it to a number, i.e.
80, before running a test statistic.
A chi-square test will give us a p-value. The p-value will tell us whether our test
results are significant or not.
However, to perform a chi-square test and get the p-value, we require two
pieces of information:
(2) The alpha level(α). You or the researcher chooses this. The usual alpha
level is 0.05 (5%), but you could also have other levels like 0.01 or 0.10.
Table
The chi-square distribution table with three probability levels is provided here.
The statistic here is used to examine whether distributions of certain variables
vary from one another. The categorical variable will produce data in the
categories and numerical variables will produce data in numerical form.
DF
Value of P
0.05 0.01 0.001
Solved Problem
Question:
A survey on cars had conducted in 2011 and determined that 60% of car
owners have only one car, 28% have two cars, and 12% have three or more.
Supposing that you have decided to conduct your own survey and have
collected the data below, determine whether your data supports the results of
the study.
Use a significance level of 0.05. Also, given that, out of 129 car owners, 73 had
one car and 38 had two cars.
Solution:
H0: The proportion of car owners with one, two or three cars is 0.60, 0.28 and
0.12 respectively.
H1: The proportion of car owners with one, two or three cars does not match the
proposed model.
Let’s tabulate the given information and calculate the required values.
Let’s compare it to the chi-square value for the significance level 0.05.
The degrees for freedom = 3 – 1 = 2
Using the table, the critical value for a 0.05 significance level with df = 2 is
5.99.
That means that 95 times out of 100, a survey that agrees with a sample will
have a χ2 value of 5.99 or less.
The Chi-square statistic is only 0.7533, so we will accept the null hypothesis.
Footnotes: Examples
As discussed, footnotes comprise small bits of information short enough to take in at a
glance. Here are a couple of examples to illustrate the function of footnotes.
A text may mention the name of an organisation and use a footnote to explain that
the organisation had a different name in the past.
A text may mention a certain sum of money in Korean Won, and the corresponding
footnotes will indicate the equivalent sum in US dollars.
Endnotes: Examples
As discussed too, endnotes can comprise much longer parcels of information. Here too
are a couple of examples to illustrate the use of endnotes.
While you may describe a certain method in your main text, you might use an
endnote to outline in more detail some other tangential studies, perhaps from a
slightly different field, which used that same method, the results they produced and
why this may be of interest.
You might cite an important quotation within the main body of your text and then
include in a related endnote the full paragraph or section from which that
quotation was taken, thus enabling interested readers to explore the wider context
and additional insights if they wish.
The bibliography should always have its own page and be numbered accordingly,
following the pages of the essay. In some cases, if the list is short, it may be included on
the final page of the essay, but a separate page is generally preferred. The title of the
bibliography, either “Bibliography” or “Works Cited,” should be centered, following
the proper MLA heading guidelines.
The entire bibliography should be double spaced, or have the same spacing alignment
as the rest of the essay, such as 1.5 or 2.0. Each entry should have a hanging indent,
where the first line is flush with the margin and subsequent lines are indented five to
seven spaces or using the Tab key.Unlike other citation styles, MLA format requires
entries to be alphabetized by the author’s surname. In cases where the author’s surname
is not known, titles should be listed alphabetically. When citing multiple works by the
same author, they should be alphabetized by title and the author’s name included in the
first entry.
MLA Footnotes and Endnotes are essential for acknowledging sources of any material
used in a paper, whether it is quoted, summarized, or paraphrased. These notes guide
readers to the specific pages of the works listed in the Works Cited, References, or
Bibliography section.
Footnotes are additional notes placed at the end of a page to provide statements or cite
references related to a particular part of the text in the body of the paper. These notes
can include interesting facts or comments that may be irrelevant to the main argument
of the paper. In this case, the author can include the information in a footnote by
embedding an image as a placeholder for the footnote at the end of the sentence being
commented on, and reprinting the symbol and their comment in the footnote.
The primary difference between Footnotes and Endnotes is that Footnotes are placed
numerically at the bottom of the same page where direct references are made, while
Endnotes are placed numerically at the end of the essay on a separate page titled
“Endnotes” or “Notes.”
If using a typewriter, a superscript number is typed half a space above the line after the
last word of the quotation, e.g., “The information Superhighway is giving way to a
Commercial Superhighway.”1. If using a word processor, the superscript feature can be
accessed. To create a Footnote citation, the same superscript number is placed at the
beginning of the Footnote at the bottom of the same page where the quotation occurs.
When citing work for the first time, a complete and full Footnote or Endnote entry
should be made.
The process for including Footnotes or Endnotes is similar for most types of texts, but
what about including footnotes on digital media such as websites and blogs?
1. To create a website footnote, first, navigate to the website you wish to cite. If
possible, identify the author of the webpage and note down the name of the site,
the date it was published online, the URL, and the date you accessed it.
2. Arrange this information in the following order, separated by commas: author’s
name (if available), “title of webpage,” date published (if available), URL
(enclosed in angle brackets), and date accessed.
3. If the website does not have a date of publication, use “n.d.” in place of the date.
For example: John Smith, “The New Summer Sidewalk,” 2009, (accessed
September 25, 2010).
It is important to remember that Footnote and Endnote citations should only include one
sentence and one period, while Bibliography entries should consist of at least three
sentences and periods for the author, title, and publication information.
Use of Superscript:
To format Footnote and Endnote entries, use a 5-space indentation or [Tab] from the
left margin. Keep one space between the superscript number and the entry. Avoid
indenting second and subsequent lines. Double-space between entries. Number
Footnotes and Endnotes in sequence using superscripts, such as 1, 2, 3, and so on.
For Endnotes, use the same superscript number as in the text for each Endnote in your
Endnotes list. Start your Endnotes list on a new page after your essay. It’s best to place
the Endnotes page before the Bibliography, Works Cited, or References page.
Refer to examples for formatting first Footnotes or Endnotes, subsequent Footnotes or
Endnotes, and listings on Works Cited or References page.