AI Project Ideas For Computer Science
AI Project Ideas For Computer Science
AI's capabilities are expanding at an unprecedented pace, leading to its embedding across a
multitude of industries and applications. Its transformative potential is evident in horizontal
applications such as content creation, workflow automation, and data analysis, as well as in
vertical domains like software engineering, sales, marketing, finance, fraud detection, and risk
management. This widespread adoption highlights AI's fundamental utility in adapting to diverse
data and problem structures, enabling innovation across various sectors.
Beyond commercial applications, themes such as AI ethics and safety, AI for social good, and
sustainable AI have become central to major AI conferences, reflecting a growing recognition of
AI's societal impact. This shift necessitates collaboration with experts from other disciplines,
including psychologists, sociologists, philosophers, and economists, to navigate the complex
implications of AI integration. The development of AI is no longer solely a technical endeavor; its
design and deployment must inherently consider human factors, ethical implications, and
broader societal consequences from the very outset. This expands the traditional understanding
of "technical feasibility" to encompass responsible deployment and user acceptance.
Specific domains where AI is already making a tangible difference include healthcare, where it
aids in early disease detection, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment planning, while also
alleviating administrative burdens. In education, AI facilitates personalized learning and adaptive
technologies. Environmental monitoring benefits from AI's capacity to analyze vast datasets ,
and smart cities leverage AI for improved infrastructure, resource optimization, and more livable
environments. The ability of AI to generalize and adapt its core capabilities—such as pattern
recognition, prediction, and automation—to disparate data sources and problem structures
allows it to bridge traditional industry boundaries and foster the creation of entirely new product
categories.
The demand for unique and innovative AI solutions is a direct consequence of the field's rapid
advancement. The sheer volume of AI research publications is increasing exponentially, and the
speed of innovation is such that immediate release of papers, even without peer review, has
become widely accepted. This dynamic environment creates an intense competitive landscape
where being first to market with a novel idea or a significant improvement is highly valued,
reflecting both academic and industry pressures.
For a final year project, this environment implies a need to select an idea that offers a clear and
defensible contribution. It encourages students to think beyond incremental enhancements and
to identify genuine gaps or opportunities for transformative applications, even if on a smaller
scale. Emerging technology trends for 2025 underscore this focus, highlighting "innovation
around Generative AI (GenAI) and AI agents". New categories like "agentic AI and
application-specific semiconductors" have recently been added to the list of top tech trends.
This indicates that while general AI capabilities continue to advance, a significant portion of
innovation lies in "applied AI" and "application-specific" solutions. Consequently, the novelty
often stems not from inventing entirely new algorithms, but from creatively applying existing or
emerging AI techniques to solve specific, previously unaddressed real-world problems or to
radically enhance current solutions within a particular domain. Students are thus encouraged to
identify specific pain points where current AI solutions are either absent, insufficient, or could be
fundamentally improved by leveraging recent AI advancements like agentic AI or specialized
generative models.
The concept of AI agents, systems capable of autonomous action and sophisticated reasoning,
is transitioning from theoretical exploration to practical implementation. While AI reasoning and
agentic AI have been studied for decades, their scope has significantly expanded in light of
current AI capabilities and limitations. There is a critical and growing need for verifiable
reasoning in AI systems, particularly for autonomously operating AI agents, where correctness
and depth of reasoning are paramount.
Research interest in Multi-Agent Learning in Dynamic Environments (MARL) is surging, with
notable successes observed in complex tasks such as playing Go, video games, robotics, and
autonomous driving. These systems demonstrate the potential for AI entities to interact, learn,
and coordinate within intricate environments. The progression of agentic AI suggests a
fundamental shift from AI merely serving as a tool to AI functioning as a proactive partner.
Earlier AI applications often performed specific tasks upon command. Now, agentic AI systems
are designed to independently initiate actions, adapt to changing circumstances, and even
collaborate seamlessly with human counterparts. This implies a higher degree of autonomy and
a capacity for proactive problem-solving, especially in scenarios where human cognitive load is
substantial. For instance, agentic AI is being explored to reduce burnout in healthcare by
automating repetitive tasks like analyzing test results, cross-checking patient records for
prescription accuracy, and managing appointment scheduling. Similarly, in education, agentic AI
can address learning gaps by providing 24/7 personalized tutoring, grading assistance, and
troubleshooting support. Autonomous systems, including both physical robots and digital
agents, are moving beyond pilot projects into practical applications, learning, adapting, and
collaborating, with visions of them acting as virtual coworkers. JPMorgan's 2025 technology
report underscores this focus, highlighting innovation around AI agents, including their role in
agentic software development and security capabilities.
Despite impressive advancements in reasoning capabilities demonstrated by large pre-trained
systems like Large Language Models (LLMs), a significant challenge remains: guaranteeing the
correctness and depth of their reasoning, especially for autonomously operating agents. This
fundamental limitation of current large models presents a substantial opportunity for further
development. Projects could explore hybrid AI systems that combine the powerful pattern
recognition and generative abilities of LLMs with more traditional, verifiable formal reasoning
techniques. Integrating symbolic AI or constraint solvers to validate or refine LLM outputs in
critical decision-making contexts within agentic systems could provide the necessary
guarantees for reliable autonomous operation.
Leveraging AI for societal benefit has become a significant area of focus, extending beyond
purely commercial applications. AI ethics and safety, alongside AI for social good, are central
themes in major AI conferences. Researchers, such as those at Duke University, are actively
using AI tools to address critical societal problems including healthcare, criminal justice, fake
news detection, equitable allocation of public resources, environmental sustainability, and
energy management. The AI for Social Good (AI4SG) movement specifically aims to harness AI
and Machine Learning (ML) to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs).
For many AI4SG applications, conditions such as interpretability, transparency, morality, and
fairness are considered essential. This highlights that simply applying AI to a social problem is
insufficient; the manner in which it is applied, and the ethical safeguards integrated into its
design, are equally critical. However, a critique has emerged regarding AI4SG, suggesting it can
sometimes manifest as "technosolutionism" driven by large technology companies. This
perspective argues that such initiatives might inadvertently depoliticize datafication and obscure
underlying power relations, potentially serving corporate interests rather than genuinely
addressing societal needs.
The explicit emphasis on interpretability, transparency, morality, and fairness as "essential" for
AI4SG , coupled with the critique of "technosolutionism" , underscores that ethical
considerations are not merely an add-on but an intrinsic requirement for impactful AI for social
good. Projects in this domain must integrate ethical considerations and fairness metrics into
their design and evaluation from the outset. This could involve developing explainable AI (XAI)
components, implementing bias detection and mitigation strategies, or establishing mechanisms
for community oversight to ensure the technology genuinely serves the public good and avoids
unintended harm. Furthermore, AI research is increasingly tied to collaboration with experts
from diverse disciplines, including psychologists, sociologists, philosophers, and economists.
This interdisciplinary requirement indicates that solving complex social problems with AI
demands more than just computer science expertise. Students should consider projects that
inherently require an understanding of the domain problem from a non-technical perspective,
perhaps through user research with domain experts, incorporating social science theories into
the AI design, or focusing on human-AI interaction in sensitive contexts.
Smart cities leverage AI for enhanced efficiency in areas like traffic flow management, energy
optimization, waste management, infrastructure, and urban planning through digital twins.
Singapore and Barcelona are notable examples, utilizing AI for real-time traffic management,
public transport optimization, and comprehensive urban simulations.
However, significant hurdles exist in real-world deployment. A key challenge is the "sim-to-real"
gap, where AI systems perform well in simulations but struggle with the complexities of
real-world cities, such as broken sensors or unpredictable traffic patterns. A major concern is
the lack of transparency in AI decisions; city officials express skepticism about automated
systems if they cannot understand why a decision was made or who is responsible if something
goes wrong. This points to a fundamental "trust deficit." If citizens and administrators do not
understand or trust AI decisions, widespread adoption will be limited, regardless of technical
prowess. Projects should prioritize "human-in-the-loop" AI systems for smart cities, where AI
provides suggestions but human experts retain final decision-making authority. This also
necessitates developing explainable AI (XAI) components and uncertainty quantification to build
confidence and ensure responsible deployment in high-stakes urban environments.
Other challenges include high initial implementation costs, the need for significant infrastructure
upgrades, and the complexity of system integration. Data privacy, ethical dilemmas,
cybersecurity threats, the digital divide, fragmented technologies, and a lack of standardization
further impede progress. Language bias and unequal access to technology also risk
exacerbating existing inequalities. While current smart city initiatives often focus on efficiency,
the concerns about exacerbating social inequalities, data privacy, and the digital divide highlight
a need for a broader, human-centric vision, as exemplified by Barcelona's "15-minute city"
concept. Projects could explore AI applications that explicitly aim for social equity and inclusivity
in urban planning, rather than solely optimization. This might involve developing AI models that
simulate the social impact of urban changes, identify underserved areas for resource allocation,
or create accessible citizen engagement platforms that bridge language and digital literacy
barriers.
Ethical challenges and accessibility gaps in AI are not simply problems to be solved; they
represent rich areas for innovative project development that can lead to more robust,
trustworthy, and inclusive AI systems. Ethical AI development and safety are central themes in
major AI conferences. Key ethical considerations include privacy, confidentiality, informed
consent, bias, fairness, transparency, accountability, autonomy, human agency, and safety.
Non-transparent reasoning from AI systems can undermine user confidence and trust.
Bias in AI is a complex issue that extends beyond mere technical fixes, requiring a broader
assessment involving business leaders and cross-functional teams. Algorithmic bias and ableist
assumptions can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and limit access for people with disabilities,
often stemming from biased datasets and a lack of diverse perspectives in the AI development
process. AI systems frequently assume a "one-size-fits-all" model, overlooking the diverse
needs of users. Privacy concerns are particularly significant in sensitive applications such as
healthcare, smart cities, and mental health.
To mitigate these issues, an "ethics by design" approach is critical. This means integrating
ethical principles from the initial problem formulation through data collection, model
development, and deployment. This approach builds trust and ensures the AI system serves its
intended purpose equitably and responsibly. Mitigation strategies include designing with
empathy, using user personas and journey mapping , and crucially, involving people with lived
experiences (e.g., disabled individuals, minority communities) in the design and deployment
process. Proactively addressing bias through thorough testing and ensuring diverse
representation in training data is also essential. Examples of existing accessibility tools
leveraging AI include applications for visual impairment (e.g., Be My Eyes), live captions and
transcripts for hearing impairment, AI assistants for digital support, and simplified language
translation.
The current shortcomings of AI for people with disabilities stem from a lack of diverse
representation in development and data. This highlights that designing for accessibility from the
start can lead to more robust and universally beneficial AI systems. Projects could focus on
developing AI tools that are inherently inclusive, perhaps by incorporating diverse data, building
adaptive interfaces for various needs, or creating AI systems that actively learn from and adapt
to individual user preferences and abilities, rather than assuming a "norm." This aligns with the
principle of designing with people with disabilities, not just for them. Furthermore, human
oversight and decision-making are crucial, especially in sensitive contexts like mental health,
where AI insights should remain advisory rather than directive.
The growing integration of AI in healthcare, while enhancing diagnostic efficiency and detection
rates, presents a significant risk of "skill erosion" among healthcare professionals. Research
indicates that doctors' independent diagnostic abilities can decline by as much as 20% when AI
support is removed, even for highly experienced clinicians, suggesting an unconscious
over-reliance on AI cues. This issue is particularly critical for trainees who might become overly
dependent on AI before fully mastering fundamental diagnostic and observational skills. Current
AI applications predominantly focus on providing diagnostic assistance or automating
administrative tasks, rather than actively preserving or enhancing human cognitive and
observational skills.
This project innovates by fundamentally reorienting the role of AI in medical training and
continuous professional development. Instead of AI serving as a primary diagnostic tool, it
becomes an active skill preservation and enhancement agent. Unlike existing AI training
modules that might offer static learning paths or pre-programmed simulations, this "co-pilot"
dynamically adapts to a clinician's real-time performance, specifically targeting and mitigating
the identified risk of AI-induced skill degradation. This approach embodies the "balanced
approach—where AI supports rather than replaces human judgment" , ensuring that human
expertise remains central and resilient alongside technological advancements.
The impact of such a system would be significant, directly addressing a critical emerging
challenge in healthcare by safeguarding and enhancing human expertise, which is paramount
for patient safety and the delivery of high-quality care. It can substantially improve the long-term
competency of medical professionals, particularly during their formative training years. As a
product, it holds high viability for medical schools, teaching hospitals, and organizations focused
on continuous professional development. It offers a unique value proposition by ensuring a
resilient, skilled human workforce that can effectively collaborate with AI, rather than being
diminished by it.
Feasibility: The project can be realistically scoped by focusing on a specific medical domain,
such as interpreting X-rays for bone fractures or analyzing colonoscopy images for
pre-cancerous growths. Developing a simplified simulated environment for clinician interaction is
achievable. Leveraging existing open-source medical image datasets and readily available
reinforcement learning frameworks would be crucial for project implementation.
Challenges: Key challenges include acquiring or generating sufficiently realistic and diverse
simulated medical data, designing effective reinforcement learning reward functions that
incentivize genuine skill improvement (as opposed to merely task completion), ensuring the AI's
prompts are genuinely helpful and non-distracting, and rigorously evaluating the system's
long-term impact on human skill retention. Ethical considerations around data privacy (even with
simulated data) and the psychological impact of AI-generated feedback on clinicians would
require careful consideration and design.
A significant "digital divide" persists globally, where underserved communities often lack access
to basic digital resources, reliable connectivity, and, crucially, the foundational digital and AI
literacy required to effectively benefit from AI-enhanced learning opportunities. This disparity
exacerbates existing educational inequalities and prevents the effective integration of AI in
classrooms and communities where its potential impact is most needed. Current AI education
tools frequently assume a baseline of digital literacy and access, or they inadvertently
perpetuate biases by failing to account for diverse learning needs, cultural backgrounds, and
socio-economic realities.
This project is unique because its primary objective is to build AI literacy itself within
marginalized populations, directly addressing the needs of the "AI-Excluded". It transcends the
conventional use of AI to teach traditional subjects; instead, it focuses on teaching about AI
responsibly. The emphasis on multimodal accessibility (e.g., voice-first interaction) and
optimization for resource-constrained environments (e.g., mobile, edge devices) significantly
distinguishes it from mainstream AI educational tools. This approach aligns with the principle of
"guiding, not just giving" , and proactively addresses potential biases by educating users on AI's
limitations and ethical considerations.
The potential impact of this platform is substantial: it would empower individuals and
communities by equipping them with essential digital and AI skills for the evolving digital age.
This directly contributes to reducing educational inequality, fostering informed engagement with
AI technologies, and promoting ethical technology use across society. As a product, it
possesses high viability for non-governmental organizations (NGOs), community learning
centers, and educational initiatives operating in developing regions or underserved domestic
areas. It fills a critical gap in foundational digital and AI education, providing a scalable solution
for widespread impact.
Feasibility: The project can be realistically scoped by focusing on a specific set of core AI
literacy concepts (e.g., "What is machine learning?", "How does AI use data?", "What is AI
bias?") and targeting a defined demographic for initial testing. Leveraging existing open-source
NLP models and adaptive learning frameworks is feasible for implementation.
Challenges: Key challenges include designing a truly intuitive and accessible multimodal
interface that caters to diverse user needs, ensuring the AI's explanations are clear, accurate,
and culturally sensitive, and developing robust assessment methods for digital literacy
acquisition. Furthermore, gathering diverse and representative data for model training is crucial
to avoid perpetuating existing biases. Ethical considerations around data collection from
vulnerable populations and ensuring their informed consent are paramount throughout the
project lifecycle.
This project is unique in its dual focus: it combines hyper-local, citizen-driven environmental
monitoring with a foundational commitment to "Green AI" principles. It is not merely an AI for
sustainability application, but an AI application that is itself designed to be sustainable,
addressing the "AI for Good vs. AI's Footprint" dilemma. This approach directly tackles the data
access and cost challenges of traditional monitoring by decentralizing data collection and
empowering citizens with actionable environmental intelligence. It also provides a tangible
demonstration of how AI can be developed and deployed responsibly with a minimal ecological
footprint.
The impact of this platform would be significant, empowering communities with real-time,
localized environmental data, enabling more proactive local environmental management, and
fostering greater environmental awareness and engagement among citizens. It serves as a
practical demonstration of how AI can be developed and deployed responsibly with minimal
ecological footprint. As a product, it possesses high viability for smart city initiatives,
environmental agencies, community advocacy groups, and educational institutions focused on
sustainability. It offers a scalable model for widespread environmental data collection and
analysis, complementing broader monitoring efforts.
Smart city initiatives frequently prioritize efficiency gains in areas such as traffic flow and energy
optimization but often inadvertently overlook or even exacerbate social inequalities, data privacy
concerns, and ethical dilemmas. Existing "Digital Twins," such as Barcelona's virtual replica ,
primarily simulate physical urban systems and infrastructure changes. However, they typically
lack explicit ethical reasoning capabilities or comprehensive social impact assessment
functionalities. This leads to a "trust deficit" among citizens and administrators due to a lack of
transparency and accountability in smart city AI decisions. City officials, for instance, express a
desire to understand why an AI makes a particular decision and who is responsible if something
goes wrong.
The proposed solution involves extending the concept of an urban "Digital Twin" by integrating
an "Ethical Layer" powered by AI. This AI would simulate not only physical and infrastructure
changes (e.g., new building developments, public transport routes) but also their potential social
and ethical impacts on various demographic groups within the city. For example, it could assess
the risk of gentrification from new developments, evaluate equitable access to public services,
or analyze the privacy implications of new surveillance technologies. The system would
leverage formal reasoning techniques and multi-agent simulations to identify potential ethical
conflicts or biases inherent in proposed urban interventions. The "Ethical Digital Twin" would
provide urban planners with "what-if" scenarios, complete with ethical impact assessments and
explainable insights (XAI), supporting a "human-in-the-loop" decision-making process where AI
offers suggestions but human experts retain final authority.
The core AI techniques for this system would include:
● Multi-Agent Systems: To simulate the diverse behaviors, interactions, and needs of
different citizen groups within the urban environment, allowing for the observation of
emergent social dynamics.
● Formal Reasoning/Symbolic AI: For encoding and applying ethical rules, detecting
logical inconsistencies, and identifying potential conflicts or biases in proposed urban
policies or designs.
● Predictive Modeling: For forecasting social impacts, such as changes in accessibility,
affordability, or community cohesion resulting from urban interventions.
● Explainable AI (XAI): To provide transparent and understandable explanations for the
AI's ethical assessments and predictions, building trust and facilitating informed human
decision-making.
This project is unique in its explicit integration of ethical reasoning and social equity simulation
into a digital twin for urban planning. It represents a significant advancement beyond purely
technical or efficiency-driven smart city models by prioritizing human well-being and fairness. By
providing an "ethical lens" for urban development, it directly addresses the persistent challenges
of bias, privacy, and social inequality in smart cities. This approach fosters the creation of more
inclusive, equitable, and trustworthy urban environments, moving beyond optimization to truly
human-centered urban design.
The impact of this "Ethical Digital Twin" would be profound, leading to more equitable, inclusive,
and socially responsible urban development. It provides a powerful tool for policymakers and
urban planners, enabling them to foresee and mitigate negative societal impacts before
implementing changes, thereby enhancing public trust in smart city initiatives. As a product, it
possesses high viability for municipal governments, urban planning departments, architectural
firms, and academic research institutions focused on responsible urban development and social
impact assessment.
Feasibility: The project can be realistically scoped by focusing on a specific urban planning
challenge (e.g., assessing the impact of a new public transport line on accessibility for different
income groups) within a simplified representation of a city district. Leveraging open-source
Geographic Information System (GIS) data and multi-agent simulation libraries is feasible. The
ethical reasoning component could start with a limited, well-defined set of ethical rules or
principles.
Challenges: Key challenges include defining and quantifying abstract concepts such as "ethical
impact" and "social equity" metrics in a measurable way, integrating diverse data types
(demographic, economic, spatial) from various sources, and developing robust multi-agent
simulations that accurately reflect real-world social dynamics. Creating intuitive XAI explanations
for complex ethical trade-offs and ensuring the ethical layer itself is unbiased and culturally
sensitive would be paramount.
Ethical considerations are not optional add-ons but are fundamental to the responsible and
effective deployment of AI, particularly in sensitive domains. AI ethics and safety are central
themes in major AI conferences. For AI applications aimed at social good, interpretability,
transparency, morality, and fairness are considered essential conditions. The presence of bias in
AI is not solely a technical issue; it requires a broader, systemic assessment involving various
stakeholders, including business leaders and cross-functional teams. Algorithmic bias and
ableist assumptions can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and limit access for certain
populations, often stemming from biased datasets and a lack of diverse perspectives during
development. Key ethical considerations encompass privacy, confidentiality, informed consent,
bias, fairness, transparency, accountability, autonomy, human agency, and safety.
Non-transparent reasoning from AI systems can significantly undermine user confidence.
For any AI project, especially those with societal impact, an "ethics by design" approach is
critical. This means integrating ethical considerations from the initial problem formulation
through data collection, model development, and deployment. This approach is vital for building
trust and ensuring the AI system serves its intended purpose equitably and responsibly.
Mitigation strategies include designing with empathy, utilizing user personas and journey
mapping to understand diverse user perspectives. Crucially, this involves actively including
people with lived experiences (e.g., disabled individuals, minority communities) in the design
and deployment process to ensure inclusivity. Proactively addressing bias through thorough
testing and ensuring diverse representation in training data is also a key strategy.
AI systems are inherently data-driven, making robust data privacy and security paramount,
especially when dealing with sensitive personal or environmental information. Significant privacy
concerns exist around the use of AI in healthcare, which has led to reluctance in sharing
medical data. In smart cities, extensive data collection raises considerable concerns about data
privacy and security, with technologies like facial recognition risking individual privacy and
freedom rights, particularly when data is misused or misinterpreted. For mental health
applications that require continuous data collection, clear guidelines are needed for data
storage, processing, and sharing to maintain user trust. Safeguarding Indigenous data
sovereignty is also an important consideration in areas like traditional medicine.
To address these concerns, implementing robust cybersecurity measures, data encryption, and
anonymization techniques is essential. Adhering to established data protection laws, such as
the GDPR in Europe, and educating users on how their data is collected, stored, and used are
crucial steps in building trust and ensuring responsible data handling. Data privacy and security
are non-negotiable for AI projects that handle personal or sensitive information. Students must
consider comprehensive data governance frameworks, explicit consent mechanisms, and
effective anonymization strategies from the outset of their project planning. This not only
protects users but also establishes the necessary foundation of trust for real-world adoption and
sustained impact.
The most effective AI systems are those designed to augment, rather than replace, human
capabilities, fostering collaboration and ensuring human oversight in critical decisions. A
balanced approach, where "AI supports rather than replaces human judgment," is considered
essential for sustaining high-quality patient care and professional expertise. In smart city traffic
management, for instance, officials express skepticism about fully automated systems if they
lack transparency, wanting to understand "why the machine made a decision" and "who is
responsible" if errors occur. Consequently, a "human-in-the-loop" approach, where AI suggests
decisions but human experts retain the final say, is emphasized as crucial for building trust and
accountability. Similarly, in mental health, human providers bring irreplaceable qualities such as
empathy and cultural understanding; therefore, AI should assist them rather than replace their
role. AI-generated insights in such sensitive contexts must remain advisory, not directive. The
overarching goal is to strike a balance in human involvement, utilizing uncertainty indicators to
inform users when to trust the system's recommendations and when to override them based on
their expert judgment. Human-in-the-loop (HITL) design is critical for developing trustworthy and
responsible AI systems, particularly in high-stakes domains. Projects should actively incorporate
mechanisms for human oversight, intervention, and feedback. This ensures that AI functions as
a powerful assistant, allowing humans to focus on tasks requiring empathy, creativity, and
nuanced judgment, while also maintaining clear lines of accountability.
The current landscape of Artificial Intelligence offers vast and exciting opportunities for
innovation, particularly for Bachelor of Computer Science students seeking impactful final year
projects. The analysis presented in this report highlights significant potential in developing AI
solutions that address critical societal challenges across healthcare, education, environmental
sustainability, and smart cities. Furthermore, there is a compelling need and opportunity to
contribute to the development of more responsible and sustainable AI systems themselves,
aligning with the principles of Green AI. The emergence of agentic AI and specialized
generative models provides powerful new tools to create truly novel applications or to
significantly improve upon existing ones, pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve.
For students embarking on their final year projects, the following recommendations are provided
to maximize impact, ensure feasibility, and align with the evolving demands of the AI field:
● Start with a Clear Problem: Select a project idea that genuinely resonates and for which
a well-defined problem statement can be articulated, emphasizing its real-world
significance. A clear understanding of the problem space will guide the entire
development process.
● Scope Realistically: For a Bachelor's project, it is crucial to narrow the scope to a
manageable yet impactful sub-problem. The focus should be on demonstrating core AI
principles and the unique aspect of the proposed solution, rather than attempting to build
a full-scale commercial product.
● Prioritize Data Availability: Recognize that data quality and quantity are critical for AI
model performance. Early in the project planning, identify or plan for the generation of
suitable datasets. This proactive approach can prevent significant roadblocks later in
development.
● Integrate Ethical Considerations: Embed ethical AI development, bias mitigation, and
data privacy considerations into every stage of the project. This demonstrates a holistic
understanding of responsible AI and ensures the solution is fair, transparent, and
trustworthy.
● Embrace Human-in-the-Loop Design: Design AI systems that augment human
capabilities and include clear mechanisms for human oversight and collaboration. This
approach ensures that AI acts as a powerful assistant, allowing humans to focus on tasks
requiring empathy, creativity, and nuanced judgment, while also maintaining
accountability.
● Consider Sustainability: Actively think about the computational efficiency and
environmental footprint of the chosen AI solution. Where possible, align the project with
Green AI principles, such as optimizing model size, training efficiency, or exploring edge
computing for lower power consumption. This forward-thinking approach adds significant
value.
● Seek Interdisciplinary Input: Consult with domain experts (e.g., healthcare
professionals, educators, urban planners, environmental scientists) to gain deeper
insights into the problem space. This collaboration ensures the proposed solution is
practical, impactful, and addresses genuine needs.
● Document Uniqueness: Clearly articulate why the chosen idea is unique, less
implemented, or offers significant improvements over existing solutions. This requires a
thorough understanding of the current state of the art and careful justification of the
project's novel contribution.
Works cited