Going Concern Audit Procedures Explained
Going Concern Audit Procedures Explained
○ Assets and liabilities recorded assuming entity will realize When performing risk assessment procedures as required by SA 315,
assets and discharge liabilities in the normal course of the auditor shall consider whether events or conditions exist that
business may cast significant doubt on the entity's ability to continue as a
● Liquidation basis going concern
○ When an entity is not viewed as a going concern, FS
prepared on liquidation basis The auditor shall determine whether management has already
○ Inventories may be written down, assets recorded at likely performed a preliminary assessment of the entity's ability to
prices they will fetch continue as a going concern.
● If done - discuss it and check if doubt exists and what plans
Responsibility for assessment of the entity’s ability to continue as a management has.
going concern
● If not - discuss the basis for using going concern and inquire
Management is required to assess the entity’s ability to continue as about any such events or conditions.
a going concern even if the financial reporting framework does not
include an explicit requirement to do so. Management’s assessment Auditors must stay alert during the audit for evidence of such events
of the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern involves making
or conditions.
a judgment, at a particular point in time, about future outcomes of
events or conditions. Factors relevant for judgment about future
Evaluating Management’s Assessment
outcomes of events or conditions are: ● Auditor shall evaluate management's assessment of going
● Degree of Uncertainty increases as the timing of the event or concern.
outcome is further in the future. ● It is not the auditor's responsibility to fix lack of analysis by
● The size and complexity of the entity, the nature and condition management.
of its business and the degree to which it is affected by external ● Lack of detailed analysis may still allow auditor to conclude if
factors. going concern basis is appropriate.
● Information available at the time at which the judgment is made. ● Example: If there is a history of profits and easy access to
funds, detailed analysis may not be needed.
●
● In other cases, auditor evaluates management's process,
A startup forecasting cash flows for 6 months is more reliable than
● A large multinational in a volatile industry like oil & gas faces more
assumptions, and feasibility of plans.
uncertainty than a small local grocery store. ● Auditor shall evaluate for the same period as management or
● Management may judge the company stable based on current orders,
longer if required by law.
● If assessment covers less than 12 months from FS date, auditor
but a sudden government ban later may change the actual outcome.
When the impact is big and the chance of happening is high Example:
If a company is facing a major lawsuit that could lead to huge losses and has a high
chance of losing, this creates material uncertainty and must be disclosed in the
financial statements.
Examples of audit procedures when events or conditions have been Operating events or conditions
identified that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to ● Shortages of important supplies
continue as going concern ● M anagement intentions to liquidate the entity or to cease
● Analysing and discussing cash flow, profit and other relevant operations
forecasts with management ● Emergence of a highly successful competitor
● Analysing and discussing the entity’s latest available interim ● Loss of key management without replacement
● Reading the terms of debentures and loan agreements and principal supplier(s)
determining whether any have been breached ● Labour difficulties
● Inquiring of the entity’s legal counsel regarding the existence ● Uninsured or underinsured catastrophes when they occur
of litigation and claims and the reasonableness of ● Pending legal or regulatory proceedings against the entity that
management’s assessments of their outcome and the estimate may, if successful, result in claims that the entity is unlikely to
of their financial implications be able to satisfy
● Confirming the existence, legality and enforceability of ● Statutory or regulatory requirements
arrangements to provide or maintain financial support with ○ Non-compliance with capital or other statutory or
related and third parties and assessing the financial ability of regulatory requirements, such as solvency or liquidity
such parties to provide additional funds requirements for financial institutions
● Evaluating the entity’s plans to deal with unfilled customer ● Changes in law or regulation or government policy expected to
orders adversely affect the entity.
● Performing audit procedures regarding subsequent events to
identify those that either mitigate or otherwise affect the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern
● Confirming the existence, terms and adequacy of borrowing
facilities
A difference between the amounts, classification, presentation, or additional audit procedures to determine whether misstatements
remain.
disclosure of a reported financial statement item and the amount,
classification, presentation, or disclosure that is required for the ● The correction by management of all misstatements, including
item to be in accordance with the applicable financial reporting those communicated by the auditor, helps maintain accurate
framework. Misstatements can arise from error or fraud. records and reduces future misstatement risk from prior period
uncorrected items.
An entity has wrongly capitalized machinery repair expenses ● If management refuses
amounting to Rs.5 lacs resulting in overstatement of profits. It is an ○ Understand reasons for refusal.
example of misstatement. ○ shall take that understanding into account when evaluating
whether the FS as a whole are free from material
Uncorrected misstatements misstatement.
Misstatements that the auditor has accumulated during the audit and
that have not been corrected. Evaluating the Effect of Uncorrected Misstatements
● ₹
₹
Example:Auditor finds 5 lakhs of repair expense wrongly capitalized
₹
be [Link] expands testing in fixed assets.
● Auditor says if 1.2 lakh remains uncorrected, qualified opinion may
be needed.
₹ ₹ ₹
Aggregate misstatements approach materiality (SA 320)
must be considered.
material.
₹
Example:Auditor finds multiple small errors ( 1L, 2L, 1.5L).
Written Representation
Documentation
Up and High Private Limited has started its export business during the year
2023-24. The company was catering to the domestic market only in past
company has understated its revenue by ₹ 50.00 lacs in the year 2023-24
recognition.
● SA 560, “Subsequent Events” deals with the auditor’s ○ to facts that become known to the auditor after the date of
responsibilities relating to subsequent events in an audit of FSs. the auditor's report,
● SA 700 explains that the date of the auditor’s report informs ■ that, had they been known to the auditor at that date,
the reader that the auditor has considered the effect of events ■ may have caused the auditor to amend the auditor's
and transactions of which the auditor becomes aware and that report.
occurred up to that date.
Audit Procedure Regarding Events Occurring between the Date of the
Meaning of Subsequent Event FSs and the Date of the Auditor’s Report
Subsequent Events The auditor shall perform audit procedures designed to obtain
● Events occurring between the date of the FSs and the date of the sufficient appropriate audit evidence that
auditor's report, and ● all events occurring between the date of the FSs and the date of
● facts that become known to the auditor after the date of the the auditor’s report
auditor's report ● that require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the FSs
○ had they been known to the auditor at that date, ● have been identified and are appropriately reflected in those FSs.
○ may have caused the auditor to amend the auditor's report.
Risk assessment w.r.t Subsequent Event Shall Include
Types of Subsequent Events The auditor shall take into account the auditor’s risk assessment
Type 1 which shall include the following:
Those events that provide additional evidence with respect to ● Obtaining an understanding of any procedures management has
conditions that existed on the date of balance sheet and effect the established to ensure that subsequent events are identified.
estimation made in the preparation of the FSs. The FS should be ● Inquiring of management and, where appropriate, TCWG as to
adjusted for any change in estimates resulting from the use of whether any subsequent events have occurred which might affect
evidence of subsequent events. the FSs.
● Read the minutes of meeting of board of directors, executive
For example committee, meeting of shareholders held after balance sheet
● Debtors as on balance sheet date are declared insolvent after date
the balance sheet date but before auditor's report ● Read latest interim FSs
● Settlement of legal disputes before audit report date, which
arose before balance sheet date. Written Representations
from not being misleading. ● It reflects the date that the auditor’s report and audited FSs are
made available to third parties. The date the FSs are issued
For example generally depends on the regulatory environment of the entity.
Purchase of business, Sale of shares and debentures, Loss of plant or ● In some circumstances, the date the FSs are issued may be the
inventory as a result of fire. date that they are filed with a regulatory authority.
● Since audited FSs cannot be issued without an auditor’s report,
Objective of Auditor
the date that the audited FSs are issued must not only be at or
● Obtain Sufficient and Appropriate Evidence about whether later than the date of the auditor’s report, but must also be at
○ events or later than the date the auditor’s report is provided to the
■ occurring between the date of the FSs and the date of entity.
the auditor's report that require
● adjustment of, or
● disclosure in, the FSs
Facts Which Become Known To The Auditor After The Date Of The ● However, when, after the FSs have been issued, a fact becomes
Auditor's Report But Before The Date The FSs Are Issued known to the auditor that,
The auditor has no obligation to perform any audit procedures ○ had it been known to the auditor at the date of the auditor’s
regarding the FSs after the date of the auditor’s report. report,
● However, when, after the date of the auditor’s report but before ○ may have caused the auditor to amend the auditor’s report,
the date the FSs are issued, a fact becomes known to the auditor the auditor shall
that, ■ Discuss the matter with management and, where
○ had it been known to the auditor at the date of the auditor’s appropriate, TCWG.
report,
■ Determine whether the FSs need amendment and, if
○ may have caused the auditor to amend the auditor’s report,
so,
the auditor shall
■ Discuss the matter with management and, where ■ Inquire how management intends to address the
appropriate, TCWG. matter in the FSs.
■ Determine whether the FSs need amendment and, if
Management Amends
so, If the management amends the FSs, the auditor shall
■ Inquire how management intends to address the a. Carry out the audit procedures necessary in the circumstances
matter in the FSs. on the amendment.
b. Review the steps taken by management to ensure that anyone in
Management Amends receipt of the previously issued FSs together with the auditor’s
If management amends the FSs, the auditor shall report thereon is informed of the situation.
a. Carry out the audit procedures necessary in the circumstances c. Extend the audit procedures to the date of the new auditor’s
on the amendment. report, and
b. Extend the audit procedures to the date of the new auditor’s d. Provide a new auditor’s report on the amended FSs.
report
c. Provide a new auditor’s report on the amended FSs. Emphasis of Matter paragraph or Other Matter Paragraph
No Amendment By Management
earlier report provided by the auditor.
When management does not amend the FSs in circumstances where
the auditor believes they need to be amended No Steps by Management and No Amendments
● If the auditor’s report has not yet been provided to the entity, If management
the auditor shall modify the opinion as required by SA 705 and ● does not take the necessary steps to ensure that anyone in
then provide the auditor’s report or receipt of the previously issued FSs is informed of the situation
● If the auditor’s report has already been provided to the entity, and
○ the auditor shall notify management and TCWG, ● does not amend the FSs in circumstances where the auditor
■ not to issue the FSs to third parties before the believes they need to be amended,
necessary amendments have been made.
○ If the FSs are nevertheless subsequently the auditor shall
issued without the necessary amendments, ● notify management and TCWG,
● the auditor shall take appropriate ● that the auditor will seek to prevent future reliance on the
auditor’s report.
action, to seek to prevent reliance on
● If, despite such notification, management or TCWG do not take
the auditor’s report.
these necessary steps,
● the auditor shall take appropriate action to seek to prevent
reliance on the auditor’s report.
Facts Which Become Known to the Auditor After the FSs have been
Issued.
After the FSs have been issued, the auditor has no obligation to
perform any audit procedures regarding such FSs.
a. To obtain
○ written representations from management and, where Information provided and completeness of transactions
necessary?
and
● Obtaining audit evidence on management's role in financial
c. To respond appropriately
statement preparation and transaction completeness requires
○ to written representations provided or
management's confirmation of fulfilling these responsibilities.
○ Written representations requested by the auditor but not
● The reason is that Auditors can't rely only on other audit
provided.
evidence to judge if management prepared FSs and provided the
information as per their agreed and acknowledged
responsibilities.
From Whom
For example, Let us say The auditor needs to understand management's ● Other SAs require the auditor to request written
intentions to accurately value investments. When it comes to investments, representations. If, in addition to such required representations,
their value can be significantly affected by the intentions of management auditor determines that it is necessary to obtain one or more
regarding the holding period of the investment, plans to sell it, or to use it
written representations, he shall request such other written
for some business operations. If an auditor cannot independently verify the
intent of management through other means, they may require management
representations.
to provide a written statement of their intentions regarding the ● They may include representations about the following: -
investments. This representation serves as audit evidence and is part of the ○ Whether the selection and application of accounting
auditor's documentation. policies are appropriate; and
○ Whether following matters have been recognized,
Considerations while obtaining evidence about, or evaluating, measured, presented or disclosed in accordance with the
judgments and intentions FRF:
● The entity’s past history in carrying out its stated intentions. ■ Plans or intentions that may affect the carrying
● The entity’s reasons for choosing a particular course of action. value or classification of assets and liabilities;
● The entity’s ability to pursue a specific course of action. ■ Liabilities, both actual and contingent;
● The existence or lack of any other information that might have ■ Title to, or control over, assets, the liens or
been obtained during the course of the audit that may be encumbrances on assets, and assets pledged as
inconsistent with management’s judgment or intent. collateral; and
■ Aspects of laws, regulations and contractual
Date of and Period(s) Covered by Written Representations agreements that may affect the financial statements,
● The date of the written representations shall be as near as including non-compliance
practicable to, but not after, the date of the auditor’s report on
the FSs.
● The written representations shall be for all FSs and period(s)
referred to in the auditor’s report.
1. Constructive working relationship and understanding the A statement that the engagement team and others in the firm as
matters related to audit. This relationship is developed while appropriate, the firm and, when applicable, network firms have
complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence;
maintaining auditor's Independence and objectivity.
2. The auditor in obtaining from TCWG information relevant to the and
audit. For example TCWG may assist the auditor in ● We have identified and considered all relationships that may have
understanding the entity and its environment in identifying an impact on Independence including the impact of non audit
appropriate sources of audit evidence and in providing services.
information about specific transactions or events. ● The related safeguards that have been applied to eliminate
3. TCWG in fulfilling their responsibility to oversee the financial identified threats to independence or reduce them to an
reporting process thereby reducing the risk of material
acceptable level.
misstatement of the FSs.
The Communication Process
Audit
judgment, oral communication would not be adequate. Written
● The auditor shall communicate with TCWG the responsibilities of communications need not include all matters that arose during the
the auditor in relation to the financial statement audit, including course of the audit.
that:
○ The auditor is responsible for forming and expressing an Independence
opinion on the FSs that have been prepared by The auditor shall communicate in writing with TCWG regarding
management with the oversight of TCWG; and
auditor independence when required
○ The audit of the FSs does not relieve management or TCWG
of their responsibilities. Timing of Communications
Documentation
occurred, but also on the likelihood that a misstatement could ● The auditor shall determine whether, on the basis of the audit
occur and the potential magnitude of the misstatement. work performed, the auditor has identified one or more
Significant deficiencies may, therefore, exist even though the deficiencies in IC
auditor has not identified misstatements during the audit. ● If the auditor has identified one or more deficiencies in IC, the
auditor shall determine, on the basis of the audit work
Examples of matters that the auditor may consider in determining performed, whether, individually or in combination, they
whether a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in IC constitutes a constitute significant deficiencies.
significant deficiency
● The likelihood of the deficiencies leading to material Communication of significant deficiencies in IC to TCWG
misstatements in the FSs in the future. The auditor shall communicate in writing significant deficiencies in IC
● The susceptibility to loss or fraud of the related asset or identified during the audit to TCWG on a timely basis
liability.
● The subjectivity and complexity of determining estimated The auditor shall also communicate to management at an appropriate
amounts, such as fair value accounting estimates. level of responsibility on a timely basis
● The financial statement amounts exposed to the deficiencies. a. In writing, significant deficiencies in IC that the auditor has
● The volume of activity that has occurred or could occur in the communicated or intends to communicate to TCWG, unless it
account balance or class of transactions exposed to the would be inappropriate to communicate directly to management
deficiency or deficiencies. in the circumstances; and
● The importance of the controls to the financial reporting b. Other deficiencies in IC identified during the audit that have not
process, for example: been communicated to management by other parties and that, in
○ General monitoring controls (such as oversight of the auditor’s professional judgment, are of sufficient
management). importance to merit management’s attention.