Production Function
Fundamental Questions of Managers
How can production be optimised or cost minimised How does output behave when quantity of input is increased
How Technology effects the cost of production
How can least cost combination of inputs be achieved.
What happens to rate of return when the firm expands.
Factors of Production
Production requires use of factors agents of production
Economic growth is dependent upon the supply and productivity of factors. The good and services which are used for the production of goods Inputs. What they produce Outputs. The input output analysis has become an important tool of modern economic analysis. Classified as Land, Labour, Capital, Entrepreneurship
Theory of Production
Production means creation of a valuable utility. Supply of product refers to the quantity supplied at the given price. Which depends upon Relationship between input and output Prices of inputs Managerial efficiency
Production function: The functional relationship under given technology between input and output, per unit of time. Q = f ( L, K)
Theory of Production
It states the maximum amount of output that can be produced with any given quantities of various inputs. Particular period of time Flow concept : Flow of inputs leads to flow of output
Types of Production Function
Types Short Run
(Inputs kept constant
Long Run
(Varying all inputs)
One input (Labour) is varied)
Law of variable proportion
Law of returns to scale
Concepts Of Product
1) Total Product: Total output produced by given amount of factor, other factor held constant. As the factor increases the total output increases. Average Product : AP = Total Product No of Units of a Factor employed Avg product first rises and then falls 3) Marginal Product: The addition to the total production by the employment of an extra unit of a factor MP = Q L
2)
Q L
Units of Labour
L
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Total Product (Quintals) Q 80 170 270 368 430 480 504 504 495 480
Marginal Product (Quintals)
Average Product (Quintals)
80 90 100 98 62 50 24 0 -9 -15
80 85 90 92 86 80 72 63 55 48
IR
DR
Negative
Short Run Production Function Law of Variable Proportion
One factor varying, quantities of other factor as fixed
Law of variable proportion: Its the study of the effect on output of variations in factor proportion
As the proportion of one factor in a combination of factors is increased after a point, first the marginal and then the average product of that factor will diminish. Its a new name for Law of Diminishing returns The state of technology is assumed to be given / unchanged Some inputs whose quantities is fixed Measured in physical terms.
Stages of Law of Variable proportion
H TP
Total Product
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
AP
Amount of Variable Factor
MP
Stages
Stage 1.
TP increases at an increasing rate upto a point. MP of variable factor is rising Point F (Point of Inflection), TP curve rises but its slopes decline TP is increasing at a diminishing rate. MP starts falling but its positive. AP reaches its highest point MP of variable factor rises and then falls MP of fixed factor is negative Quantity of fixed factor is too much to the variable factor
Stages
Stage 2.
TP increases at a diminishing rate, reaches its maximum point MP, AP are diminishing but positive MP becomes Zero
Stage 3.
TP slopes downwards MP of variable factor is Negative
In which stage the Producer should Produce
Stage 3 No MP of variable factor is negative Stage 1 No MP of fixed factor is negative Full utilisation is not there Stages of Economic absurdity / Economic non-sense / Non- economic regions Stage 2 Yes MP and AP are positive but diminishing
Causes
Increasing Returns Quantity of fixed factor is abundant than variable factor Fixed factor are indivisible With addition of variable factor , fixed factor is more effectively and intensively utilised. More units of variable factor are employed , the efficiency of variable factor increases specialisation of labour. Diminishing Returns The maximum point has reached. The amount of the variable factor is sufficient to ensure the efficient utilisation of fixed factor. The contribution to the production made by the variable factor after a point become less as the additional units of the variable factor have less of fixed factor.
Causes
Negative Returns Number of variable factor become too excessive to the fixed factor Marginal Product of variable factor is negative.
Diminishing returns occur because the factors of production are Imperfect substitutes for one another. There is a limit to which one factor of production can be substituted for another. Elasticity of substitution between factors is not infinite.
Technological Progress and Diminishing Returns
In todays scenario the Technological progress can suspend the operation of diminishing returns by continually improving the techniques of production.
AP4 AP3
Output
AP2 AP1
Labour Force
Long Run Laws of Return to Scale
Both the factors are taken as variables
Isoquant : is a curve representing the various combinations of two inputs that produce the same amount of output Also called as equal product curve
Factor Production
Labour Capital 1 12 Isoquant
B
C D E
2
3 4 5
8
5 3 2
General Properties of Isoquant
An Isoquant is downward sloping to the right: If more of one factor is used then less of the other factor is needed for producing same level of output Higher Isoquant represents larger output No two isoquants can intersect each other Same amount of factors can produce two levels of output Isoquants are convex to the origin Slope of isoquants diminishes from left to right, Marginal rate of technical substitution
Types of Isoquant
The shapes depends upon degree of substitutability of inputs 1) Linear Isoquant: Perfect substitutability between factors of production. An output can be produced by either using one or both Input- Output Isoquant Strict complementarity's between inputs. One method of production. If a quantity of one input is increased there will be no change in output.
Q3 Q2 Q1
2)
Q2 Q1
Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution
MRTS = The rate at which the factors can be substituted at a margin without altering the level of output. MRTS L for K = No of units of capital which can be replaced by one unit of labour
Factor Combination A B C D E Units of Labour 1 2 3 4 5 Units of Capital 12 8 5 3 2 4 3 2 1 MRTS of L for K
MRTS L for K = Slope = K = MPL L MPK
Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution
As the output remains constant When labour and capital are substituted for each other, the change in output due to decrease in the amount of capital is equal to increase in output due to increase in amount of labour. K. MPK = [Link] MRTS L for K = K = L MPL MPK
MP = Marginal productivities of labour and capital
Why Diminishing MRTS
MRTS diminishes as more and more of labour is substituted for capital. Less of capital is required to be substituted by an additional unit of labour so as maintain the same level of output.
The Law of Returns to Scale
Return to Scale: The resultant increase in total output as the two inputs increases. Total output may increase proportionately Total output may increase more than proportionately Total output may increase less than proportionately Three types: Constant Increasing Decreasing
Constant Return to Scale
Percentage change in factor inputs leads to equal percentage change in output. Factors of production are perfectly Divisible, production function must exhibit constant returns to scale In some industry it is not possible to increase or diminish factors in exactly the same proportion Some factors supplies are scarce Factors are indivisible, full utilisation is done only when production happens in large scale
Constant Return to Scale
IQ3 IQ2 IQ1
R c
b QX3 = 300 QX2= 200 QX1= 100
Units of Capital
Units of Labour oa = ab = bc
Increasing Returns to Scale
Output increases in a greater proportion than the increase in the inputs Expanding firms experience this factor Indivisibility of the factors: Some factors are better utilised at large scale of output Greater possibility of specialisation of labour and machinery Integration of processes Dimensional Advantage
Increasing Return to Scale
IQ3
IQ IQ2
Units of Capital a
c b QX3 = 300 QX2= 200 QX1= 100
Units of Labour oa > ab> bc
Decreasing Returns to Scale
When output increases in a smaller proportion then the increase in all inputs. Diseconomies outnumber economies of scale: When the firm expands beyond a point of constant return, the diseconomies outnumber ( increasing difficulties of management, co-ordination and control with the expansion in scale and output) Limited reserves of natural resources
Decreasing Return to Scale
IQ3
IQ2 IQ1
R c b QX3 = 300 QX2= 200 QX1= 100
Units of Capital
a
Units of Labour oa < ab < bc
Returns of Scale in a production process
There are three phases in production First Stage: Increasing returns to scale because of a greater possibility of specialisation of labour and machinery Second stage Constant returns to scale Third stage: Firms continue to expand decreasing returns to scale due to difficulty of co-ordination and control.
Importance of Production functions in Managerial Decision Making
Serve as the foundation for the analysis of cost Optimal allocation of firms resources in short-run and long-run Capacity Planning Accurate forecasts of demand Effective communication between the production and marketing functions
Case Study Vandana Enterprises
Owners: Kumars ( Mr Ramesh Kumar(MD) / Vandana(daughter) No of employees: 300 No of years in Business :25 Business: Textile (Spinning and weaving of white linen) Target: To expand in Domestic and Export market When the company was started, they had 350 workers, the company used old technology to produce clothes. Labour was mainly used, while machine was minimally used. The plant was modernised and mechanized over the years Production: 15000 m to 60,000m everyday (maximum technical efficiency) What should the company be doing in order to increase Sales and increase their impact in the international market.
Case Study Vandana Enterprises
Solution:
1) 2) 3) To produce Bed sheets, pillow covers etc To improve market Information Machinizing the plant further Retrench labour Import machines Hire specialised labour
4)
Case Study Pearl Diving Operation
Company: Peter F. Smithson Product: Pearl No of Years : 28 Area of Operation: North Pacific ocean Offices: Japan and Canada Mode of Operation 3 Trawlers Hired local Japanese and Canadian divers Coast of Japan more profitable ( Time / efficiency of Japanese divers) Divers intensively pearled the Japan coast ( 9 times in the same area)
Case Study Pearl Diving Operation
Sept Oct data Peter not happy with results Not been able to compensate for nonoperation of Canada Q. How many divers seem to be efficient Q. How can he modify his present plan in terms of return to scale? Trip No 1 2 3 4 5 Divers Employ ed 5 12 9 6 13 Oyster recovered (Kg) 25 70 52 30 75
6
7 8
4
13 16
18
78 76
12
76
