CHAPTER 6
STRATEGY
IMPLEMENTATION
Strategic Management
Concepts of Strategy Implementation
Successful strategy formulation does not guarantee successful
strategy implementation
It is always more difficult to do something (strategy
implementation) than to say you are going to do it (strategy
formulation)!
If it is not implemented, even the most technically perfect strategic
plan will serve little purpose
A theoretically imperfect plan that is, executed well will
accomplish more than the perfect plan that never gets off the paper
on which it is typed.
Cont’d
Most companies have strategies, but according to recent studies,
between 70% and 90% of organizations that have formulated
strategies fail to execute them.
Study has shown that 7 out of 10 CEOs, who fail, do so not because
of bad strategy, but because of bad execution.
In another study of Times 1000 companies, 80% of directors said
they had the right strategies but only 14% thought they were
implementing them well.
What is Strategy Implementation?
The sum total of the activates and choices required for
the execution of a strategic plan – it is the process by
which strategies are put into action through budgets,
programs, and procedures.
Cont’d
Programs and Tactics
Tactics: tactic is the individual action taken by the organization as
an element of the effort to accomplish a plan. Tactic is action plan
Programs: It is a collection of tactics
A program is a single use plan intended to achieve a precise
objective.
It clearly designates the steps to be taken, the resources to be used,
and the time period within which the task is to be accomplished
Cont’d
Tactics, therefore, may be viewed (like policies) as a link between the
formulation and implementation of strategy
Some of the tactics available to implement competitive strategies are timing
tactics and market location tactics
i) Timing Tactics: When to Compete
A timing tactic deals with when a company implements a strategy.
A timing tactics can be first mover or late mover
First Mover
The first company to manufacture and sell a new product or service is called
the first mover (or pioneer).
This tactic hs its own advantage and disadvantage
Cont’d
Late movers:
Research indicates that successful late movers tend to be large
firms with considerable resources and related experience
Advantage of late mover
Late movers may be able to imitate the technological advances of
others (and thus keep R&D costs low),
keep risks down by waiting until a new technological standard or
market is established, and
take advantage of the first mover’s natural inclination to ignore
market segments.
The advantage of late mover is the disadvantage of first mover & vice-versa
Cont’d
ii) Market Location Tactics: Where to Compete
A company or business unit can implement a competitive strategy
either offensively or defensively.
An offensive tactic: usually takes place in an established
competitor’s market location.
A defensive tactic usually takes place in the firm’s own current
market position as a defense against possible attack by a rival
Cont’d
Offensive Tactics
Some of the methods used to attack a competitor’s position are:
Frontal assault: the attacking firm goes head to head with its
competitor. It matches the competitor in every category from price to
promotion to distribution channel
This is generally a very expensive tactic and depressing profits for the
whole industry.
Flanking maneuver: firm may attack a part of the market where the
competitor is weak.
Bypass attack: change the rules of the game by cutting the market out
from under the established defender by offering a new type of product
that makes the competitor’s product unnecessary.
cont’d
Encirclement: attacking company or unit encircles the competitor’s
position in terms of products or markets or both
The encircler has greater product variety and/or serves more markets
Guerrilla warfare: a firm or business unit may choose to “hit and run”
Characterized by the use of small, intermittent assaults on different
market segments held by the competitor
Cont’d
Defensive tactics
defensive tactics aim to lower the probability of attack, divert attacks to less
threatening avenues, or lessen the intensity of an attack
Instead of increasing competitive advantage per se, they make a company’s/
business unit’s competitive advantage more sustainable by causing a challenger
to conclude that an attack is unattractive
These tactics deliberately reduce short-term profitability to ensure long-term
profitability
Raise structural barriers- entry barriers act to block a challenger’s logical
avenues of attack.
Increase expected retaliation: this tactic is any action that increases the
perceived threat of retaliation for an attack.
Lower the inducement for attack: a third type of defensive tactic is to reduce a
challenger’s expectations of future profits in the industry
cont’d
Budgets
• After programs and tactical plans have been developed, the budget
process begins.
Budget is the cost of the program
Planning a budget is the last real check a corporation has on the
feasibility of its selected strategy.
An ideal strategy might be found to be completely impractical only after
specific implementation programs and tactics are costed in detail
Cont’d
Procedures (outlining organizational routines)
After the divisional and corporate budgets are approved, procedures
must be developed
To implement the strategy an organization must follow various
procedural requirements.
Standard Operating Procedures typically detail the various activities
that must be carried out to complete a corporation’s programs &tactical
plans
Properly planned procedures can help eliminate poor service by making
sure that employees do not use excuses to justify poor behavior toward
customers.
Who Implements?
Implementation involves a the whole management team
Every unit and all employees have a role and need to be
committed
CEO, other senior executives, and heads of major
organizational units must lead the process and
orchestrate major initiatives
But they must rely on middle and lower-level managers to push
things on the front line and see that strategy is well-executed on
a daily basis.
Management Issues Central to Strategy
Implementation
Ch 7 -15
Establish annual objectives Match manager to strategy
Allocate resources Develop a strategy-supportive
Alter existing organizational culture
structure Adapt production/operations
Restructure & reengineer processes
Revise reward & incentive Develop an effective human
plans resources function
Minimize resistance to Downsize & furlough as needed
change Link performance & pay to
Devise policies strategies
1. Establishing Annual Objectives
To facilitate implementation, annual objectives should be derived from
the strategic objectives
The top management frame the general objectives.
Functional managers must set specific short term objectives(annual
objectives) within the framework of the general objectives.
Purpose of Annual Objectives
Basis for resource allocation
Mechanism for management evaluation
Major instrument for monitoring progress toward achieving
strategic/long-term objectives
Establish priorities (organizational, divisional, and departmental)
2. Resource allocation
There must be proper resource allocation to various units and
activities for successful implementation of strategy and hence
resource allocation is a central management activity.
To achieve desired objectives all organizations have at least 4
types of resources that can be used Monetary, Physical, Human
and Technological resources.
Strategic management allows these resources to be assigned
consequently to priorities established by annual objectives
Steps involved in Resource Allocation
1. Determining the type and the amount of resources
2. Determining the sources of resources
3. Mobilization of resources
4. Resource Allocation
5. Utilization of Resources
6. Monitoring the Resources Allocation
Problems in Resource Allocation
1. Scarcity of Resources: It would be difficult for the management
to obtain right type and right amount of resources due to scarcity
of resources.
2. Over-estimation of Resource need
Due to over-estimation of resource needs the resource allocation
problem may arise.
Normally each department may try to obtain maximum amount of
resources. This may be to avoid lack of resources in future.
Higher the demand of resources from the whole department
makes it problematic to allocate resources appropriately.
Sometimes department gets used to overemphasizing resource
requirements.
Cont’d
3. Organization’s past allocation of resources
In the past as their activities were more important than other
activities some units may be allocated with more resources.
Even though now their activities are not so important sometimes
same allocation is followed in the present situations.
On the other hand other due to past allocation, department’s
activities may be more important at present, but they do not get
required amount of resources.
So top management should consider relative importance of the
activities and the allocation of the resources.
Cont’d
4. Problem of internal politics
Some manager may involve the internal politics. E.g. departmental
heads for their departments are in a position to get more funds may
be due to their power or influence they have over top management
As a result those departments who actually deserve more funds do
not get required amount of resources.
Cont’d
6. Poor financial climate
Many investors do not invest in the shares issued by the company
due to financial climate. So to raise additional finance company
finds it difficult.
For strategy implementation this affects the resource allocation.
Sometimes company may have to go for additional loans from
financial institutions at higher cost
Cont’d
7. Conflicts of interest
Between management and various other parties (shareholders,
trader unions, employees, government, society etc) there may be
problem of conflict of interest
For example trade union may insist to assign resources to
employee’s welfare; management may like to assign resources for
transformation.
With proper conversation between management and various
parties and proper planning of resource allocation this conflict can
be solved
3. Matching Structure with Strategy
Changes in strategy leads to changes in organizational structure.
Structure should be designed to facilitate strategic pursuit of the
firm and therefore, follows strategy.
Restructuring is the corporate management term for the act of
partially dismantling and reorganizing a company for the purpose
of making it more efficient and therefore more profitable
However, most of the researchers are of the opinion that there exist
reciprocal relationship between the strategy and the structure.
The following figure indicates the two way relationships existing
between the structure and strategy
.Strategy determine the structure .The structure also has
impact on strategy
25
Strategy
Affects
Determines
structure
Cont’d
26
Restructuring -also called downsizing, rightsizing, or
delaying involves reducing the size of the firm in terms of:
-number of employees,
-number of division or units, or
-number of hierarchical levels in the organizational
structure.
The reduction in size is intended to improve both efficiency
and effectiveness.
Restructuring is concerned primarily with shareholders
well-being rather than employee well being.
4.Matching Staff with Strategy
As in the case of structure, staffing requirements should follow a change
in strategy.
Changing Hiring & Training Requirements: Having formulated a new
strategy, a corporation may find that it may need to hire new employees, train
current employees or promote experienced employees to implement the new
growth strategy or even firing people with inappropriate or substandard skills.
Experienced people with the necessary skills need to be found for promotion to
newly created managerial positions.
Matching the Manager to the Strategy: It is possible that a current CEO may
not be appropriate to implement a new strategy.
career life cycle for top executives: learning stage, harvest stage & decline stage
5. Reengineering
28
Reengineering: is the radical redesign of an organization's processes
It involves redesigning work, jobs, and processes for the
purpose of improving cost, quality, service, and speed.
It does not imply employee layoffs.
is concerned more with employee and customer well-being
than shareholder well-being.
The focus of reengineering is changing the way work is
actually carried out.
6. Managing Resistance to Change
No organization or individual can escape change. And strategy
implementation often results in change.
But the thought of change raises anxieties because people fear
economic loss, inconvenience, uncertainty, and a break in normal
social patterns
Almost any change in structure, technology, people, or strategies
has the potential to disrupt comfortable interaction patterns.
For this reason, people resist strategy implementation
Cont’d
Resistance to change can be considered the single greatest threat
to successful strategy implementation
Resistance in the form of sabotaging production machines,
absenteeism, filing unfounded grievances, and an unwillingness to
cooperate regularly occurs in organizations
People often resist strategy implementation because they do not
understand what is happening or why changes are taking place
Thus, managers must manage resistance to change
Approaches for implement change
Change Advantage
31 Description Disadvantages
strategies
Force change Giving order Implemented High
&enforcing fast resistance, low
commitment
Educative Convince High Implementatio
change people for commitment, n slow, and
change less difficult
resistance
Rational change Convince individual Implementation
easy
(self interest)
Managing resistance: Institutionalization of
strategy
Institutionalization of strategy is key solution to manage
resistance to change
Institutionalization of strategy involves two aspects
a) Communication and training on Strategy
Communication is a process of sharing the strategy information from
the formulators to the implementer
Strategy must be communicated to those people who would implement
it
once the strategy is formulated. The communication is normally
Divisional or in
writing Strategists Functional
Managers
Cont’d
(b) Securing acceptance of strategy:
It is not sufficient to communicate the strategy to the members of
organizations, but it is similarly significant to secure their acceptance
of the strategy, so that they implement the strategy efficiently.
It is advisable to make a preliminary draft of strategy, and it is spread
among all those who are expected to apply it.
Management may ask for their recommendations, if required
necessary changes are made in the strategy and after that final
strategy is prepared.
7. Follow right Leadership style
Leadership should be:
Proactive
Goal-oriented
Focused on the creation and implementation of a
creative vision
8. Create Strategy supportive
Culture
Consider the following:
Is the planned strategy compatible with the firm’s
current culture?
Can the culture be easily modified to make it more
compatible with new strategy?
Is management willing to make major organizational
changes?
Is management committed to implementing the strategy
Cont’d
.Ways of creating strategy supportive culture
9. Establish Strategic Reward Systems
To motivate employees, the company should relate reward with
performance
Individual reward systems
Piecework plans
Commission systems
Bonus plans
Promotion
Group and organizational reward systems
Group-based bonus systems
Profit sharing systems
Employee stock option systems
Organization bonus systems
Why strategies fail during implementation
stage?
There are many reasons that may cause a strategic plan to fail, which
include:
The company’s senior management has not taking it seriously
enough, that there is a failure to get management involved right from
the start, and the failure to obtain sufficient company resources to
accomplish the task.
Failure to understand the customer: the strategic plan that instead of
understanding a customer needs and wants fail to deliver. It fails to
answer the question “Why do they buy?” It is also caused by them
doing inadequate or incorrect marketing research
Cont’d
Failing in developing new employee and management skills.
Failure to coordinate: Reporting and control relationships may not be
adequate.
Failure to obtain employee commitment: the new strategy that is gone to be
applied is not well explained to employees. Also, there are no incentives given
to workers to embrace the new strategy.
Under-estimation of time requirements: No critical path analysis is been done.
Failure to follow the plan: No follow through after initial planning, and no
tracking of progress against plan.
Cont’d
Failure to manage change: Inadequate understanding of the
internal resistance to change. In addition to, lack of vision on the
relationships between processes, technology and organization.
Poor communications: Insufficient information sharing among
stakeholders. Exclusion of stakeholders and delegates
Failure to focus: Inability or unwillingness to make choices which
are true to the strategic mission (i.e. to do fewer things, better),
leads to mediocrity, and inability to compete.
Increasing Implementation Success rate
41
a) Use Mc Kinsey’s 7-s framework
successful strategy implementation requires the 7-S factors
1. Strategy: A set of decision & action which aims to gain competitive
advantage
2.structure: The organizational chart presenting ,who reports to whom,
and how task to be divide.
3. Systems: Sequential activities engaged in the daily operations
4.Style (leadership)
5. Staff (management):It related to employees training
6. Shared values (culture):is subjected to commonly used
beliefs ,mindsets &assumptions
7.Skills (management):concerned with organization’s dominant
capabilities & competencies
b) Prepare proper action plan
Elements in a Strategy Action Plan
Policies
Procedures
Methods
Rules
Objectives
Time deadlines
Personnel assignments
Strategy Implementation Actions (I)
Overall strategy broken down into manageable parts
Scope of each part defined in detail
Goals and deadlines set for accomplishment
Appropriate resources allocated
Right numbers and types of people assigned
Policies and procedures to guide their actions
One person assigned overall responsibility for each part
Progress measured and tracked
Changes and adjustments when appropriate
Examples of Strategy Implementation Actions
(I)
Marketing campaigns – new, refocus, expand or
contract, discontinue, different media, test pilots
Facilities – new, expand, repurpose, close
Products/services – new (create, develop, invent),
redesign, add new features, discontinue
Product prices – raise, lower, bundle or unbundle
products
Cont’d
Operating processes – reengineer, tasks (new,
reorder, combine, separate, perform differently or
less expensively)
Departments, offices, teams – new, refocus,
discontinue, expand, split up
Employees – new, transfer, retrain or develop, lay
off
New systems for monitoring and measuring
operating performance
.
-----END-----