Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests

Hypothesis

 A hypothesis is a claim (assumption) about a

population parameter:
 population mean

Example: The mean monthly cell phone bill of this

city is μ = $52

 population proportion

Example: The proportion of adults in this city with

cell phones is π = .68
 The Null Hypothesis, H0
 States the assumption (numerical) to be tested

Example: The mean number of TV sets in U.S.

Homes is equal to three.
H0 : μ 3
 Is always about a population parameter, not about
a sample statistic.
 The Null Hypothesis, H0

 Begin with the assumption that the null

hypothesis is true
 Similar to the notion of innocent until
proven guilty
 It refers to the status quo
 Always contains “=” , “≤” or “” sign
 May or may not be rejected
The Alternative Hypothesis, H1
 Is the opposite of the null hypothesis
 e.g., The mean number of TV sets in U.S.
homes is not equal to 3 ( H1: μ ≠ 3 )
 Challenges the status quo
 Never contains the “=” , sign
 May or may not be proven
 Is generally the hypothesis that the
researcher is trying to prove
The Hypothesis Testing Process

 Claim: The population mean age is 50.

 H0: μ = 50, H1: μ ≠ 50
 Sample the population and find sample mean.

Population

Sample
 The Hypothesis Testing Process

 Suppose the sample mean age was X = 20.

 This is significantly lower than the claimed mean
population age of 50.
 If the null hypothesis were true, the probability of
getting such a different sample mean would be very
small, so you reject the null hypothesis .
 The Hypothesis Testing Process

Sampling
Distribution of X

X
20 μ = 50
If H0 is true ... then you reject
If it is unlikely that you
the null hypothesis
would get a sample
that μ = 50.
mean of this value ... ... if in fact this were
the population mean…
The Test Statistic and Critical Values

 If the sample mean is close to the assumed

population mean, the null hypothesis is not
rejected.
 If the sample mean is far from the assumed
population mean, the null hypothesis is
rejected.
 How far is “far enough” to reject H ?
0
 The critical value of a test statistic creates a
“line in the sand” for decision making.
The Test Statistic and Critical Values

Distribution of the test statistic

Region of Region of
Rejection Rejection

Critical Values
Errors in Decision Making
 Type I Error
 Reject a true null hypothesis
 Considered a serious type of error
 The probability of a Type I Error is 

 Called level of significance of the test

 Set by researcher in advance
 Type II Error
 Failure to reject false null hypothesis
 The probability of a Type II Error is β
 Errors in Decision Making

Possible Hypothesis Test Outcomes

Actual Situation

Decision H0 True H0 False

Do Not No Error Type II Error

Reject H0 Probability 1 - α Probability β
Reject H0 Type I Error No Error
Probability α Probability 1 - β
 Level of Significance, α
Claim: The population
 Represents
mean age is 50. critical value

H0: μ = 50
Two-tail test Rejection
H1: μ ≠ 50 region is
0
shaded
H0: μ ≤ 50 
Upper-tail test
H1: μ > 50
0

H0: μ ≥ 50
Lower-tail test 
H1: μ < 50
0
Some concepts
 Selecting and interpreting Significance level
 Setting Type-I and Type-II errors
 Selecting distribution in Hypothesis testing

when σ known when σ is not known

n>30 Normal distribution, z- Normal distribution, z-table
table
N<30 and population is normal Normal distribution, z- t distribution, t-table
or approximately normal table

 Two-tailed and single-tailed tests

 Rejection and acceptance (don’t reject) of Null hypo.
Some concepts
 Power of test: α and β

 Hypothesis testing: three approaches:

 Critical value approach
 P-value approach
 Interval estimation approach
Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
6 Steps of Hypothesis Testing:
1. State the null hypothesis, H0 and state the alternative
hypotheses, H1
2. Choose the level of significance, α, and the sample size n.
3. Determine the appropriate statistical technique and the test
statistic to use
4. Find the critical values and determine the rejection region(s)
5. Collect data and compute the test statistic from the sample
result
6. Compare the test statistic to the critical value to determine
whether the test statistic falls in the region of rejection. Make
the statistical decision: Reject H0 if the test statistic falls in the
rejection region. Express the decision in the context of the
problem
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known

For two tail test for the mean, σ known:

 Convert sample statistic ( X ) to test statistic

X μ
Z 
σ
n
 Determine the critical Z values for a specified
level of significance  from a table or by using Excel
 Decision Rule: If the test statistic falls in the rejection
region, reject H0 ; otherwise do not reject H0
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
H 0: μ = 3
 There are two
H 1: μ ≠
cutoff values
(critical values), 3
defining the /2 /2
regions of
rejection
3 X
Reject H0 Do not reject H0 Reject H0
-Z +Z Z
0
Lower Upper
critical critical
value value
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known

Example: Test the claim that the true mean weight of

chocolate bars manufactured in a factory is 3 ounces.

 State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses

 H0: μ = 3 H1: μ ≠ 3 (This is a two tailed test)
 Specify the desired level of significance
 Suppose that  = .05 is chosen for this test
 Choose a sample size
 Suppose a sample of size n = 100 is selected
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
 Determine the appropriate technique
 σ is known so this is a Z test
 Set up the critical values
 For  = .05 the critical Z values are ±1.96
 Collect the data and compute the test statistic
 Suppose the sample results are

n = 100, X = 2.84
(σ = 0.8 is assumed known from past company records)
So the test statistic is: Z 
X  μ

2.84  3

 .16
 2.0
σ 0.8 .08
n 100
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
 Is the test statistic in the rejection region?

 = .05/2  = .05/2

Reject H0 Do not reject H0 Reject H0

Reject H0 if
Z < -1.96 or -Z= -1.96 0 +Z= +1.96
Z > 1.96;
otherwise do
not reject H0 Here, Z = -2.0 < -1.96, so the test
statistic is in the rejection region
Hypothesis Testing: σ Known

 Reach a decision and interpret the result

 Since Z = -2.0 < -1.96, you reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that there is sufficient
evidence that the mean weight of chocolate
bars is not equal to 3.
Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
p-Value Approach
 The p-value is the probability of obtaining a
test statistic equal to or more extreme ( < or
> ) than the observed sample value given H0
is true
 Also called observed level of significance
 Smallest value of  for which H can be
0
rejected
Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
p-Value Approach

 Convert Sample Statistic (ex. X) to Test

Statistic (ex. Z statistic )
 Obtain the p-value from a table
 Compare the p-value with 
 If p-value <  , reject H0

 If p-value   , do not reject H0

 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known p-Value
Approach
 Example: How likely is it to see a sample mean of
2.84 (or something further from the mean, in either
direction) if the true mean is  = 3.0?

X = 2.84 is translated to a Z
score of Z = -2.0 /2 = .025 /2 = .025
P(Z   2.0) .0228 .0228 .0228
P(Z  2.0) .0228

p-value
=.0228 + .0228 -1.96 0 1.96 Z
= .0456 -2.0 2.0
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
p-Value Approach
 Compare the p-value with 
 If p-value <  , reject H0

 If p-value   , do not reject H

0

Here: p-value = .0456 /2 = .025 /2 = .025

 = .05 .0228 .0228
Since .0456 < .05, you
reject the null
hypothesis
-1.96 0 1.96 Z
-2.0 2.0
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
Confidence Interval Connections
 For X = 2.84, σ = 0.8 and n = 100, the 95%
confidence interval is:
0.8 0.8
2.84 - (1.96) to 2.84  (1.96)
100 100

2.6832 ≤ μ ≤ 2.9968

 Since this interval does not contain the hypothesized

mean (3.0), you reject the null hypothesis at  = .05
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
One Tail Tests
 In many cases, the alternative hypothesis
focuses on a particular direction

This is a lower-tail test since the

H0: μ ≥ 3
alternative hypothesis is focused on the
lower tail below the mean of 3
H1: μ < 3
H0: μ ≤ 3 This is an upper-tail test since the
alternative hypothesis is focused on the
H1: μ > 3 upper tail above the mean of 3
Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
Lower Tail Tests
 There is only one critical value, since the
rejection area is in only one tail.

Reject H0 Do not reject

-Z H0 Z
μ X

Critical value
Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
Upper Tail Tests
 There is only one critical value, since the
rejection area is in only one tail.

Do not reject Reject

Z H0 Z H0
X μ

Critical value
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
Upper Tail Test Example
A phone industry manager thinks that customer monthly cell phone
bills have increased, and now average more than $52 per month.
The company wishes to test this claim. Past company records
indicate that the standard deviation is about $10.

Form hypothesis test:

H0: μ ≤ 52 the mean is less than or equal to than $52 per month
H1: μ > 52 the mean is greater than $52 per month
(i.e., sufficient evidence exists to support the
manager’s claim)
Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
Upper Tail Test Example
 Suppose that  = .10 is chosen for this test
 Find the rejection region:
Reject H0

1- = .90
 = .10

Do not reject H0 Reject H0

0 Z
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
Upper Tail Test Example
What is Z given a = 0.10?
.90 .10
Z .07 .08 .09
a = .10
1.1 .8790 .8810 .8830
.90
1.2 .8980 .8997 .9015
z 0 1.28
1.3 .9147 .9162 .9177
Critical Value
= 1.28
Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
Upper Tail Test Example
 Obtain sample and compute the test statistic.
 Suppose a sample is taken with the following
results: n = 64, X = 53.1 (=10 was
assumed known from past company records)
 Then the test statistic is:

X μ 53.1  52
Z   0.88
σ 10
n 64
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
Upper Tail Test Example
 Reach a decision and interpret the result:
Reject H0
1- = .90
 = .10

0 1.28
Z = .88

Do not reject H0 since Z = 0.88 ≤ 1.28

i.e.: there is not sufficient evidence that the mean bill is greater than $52
Hypothesis Testing: σ Known
Upper Tail Test Example
Calculate the p-value and compare to 
p-value = .1894

Reject H0
P( X 53.1)
 = .10
 53.1  52.0 
P Z  
 10/ 64 
0
Do not reject
1.28
Reject H0 P(Z 0.88) 1  .8106
H0
Z = .88 .1894

Do not reject H0 since p-value = .1894 >  = .10

 Hypothesis Testing: σ Unknown

 If the population standard deviation is unknown, you

instead use the sample standard deviation S.
 Because of this change, you use the t distribution
instead of the Z distribution to test the null hypothesis
about the mean.
 All other steps, concepts, and conclusions are the
same.
Hypothesis Testing: σ Unknown

 Recall that the t test statistic with n-1

degrees of freedom is:

X μ
t n -1 
S
n
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Unknown
Example
The mean cost of a hotel room in New York is said
to be $168 per night. A random sample of 25 hotels
resulted in X = $172.50 and S = 15.40. Test at the
 = 0.05 level.

(A stem-and-leaf display and a normal probability plot

indicate the data are approximately normally distributed )

H0: μ=
168 H1:
μ 168
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Unknown
Example
H0: μ = 168
Determine the regions of rejection
H1: μ ≠ 168
 α = 0.05
 n = 25 α/2=.025 α/2=.025
  is unknown, so
use a t statistic Reject H0 Reject H0
Do not reject H0 t n-1,α/2
 Critical Value: -t n-1,α/2 0
t24 = ± 2.0639 -2.0639 2.0639
 Hypothesis Testing: σ Unknown
Example
X μ 172.50  168
t n 1   1.46
S 15.40
n 25
a/2=.025 a/2=.025

-t n-1,α/2 t n-1,α/2
0 1.46
-2.0639 2.0639
Do not reject H0: not sufficient evidence
that true mean cost is different from $168
Hypothesis Testing: Connection to
Confidence Intervals
 For X = 172.5, S = 15.40 and n = 25, the 95%
confidence interval is:
15.4 15.4
172.5 - (2.0639) to 172.5  (2.0639)
25 25

166.14 ≤ μ ≤ 178.86

 Since this interval contains the hypothesized

mean (168), you do not reject the null
hypothesis at  = .05
Hypothesis Testing: σ Unknown
 Recall that you assume that the sample
statistic comes from a random sample from a
normal distribution.
 If the sample size is small (< 30), you should
use a box-and-whisker plot or a normal
probability plot to assess whether the
assumption of normality is valid.
 If the sample size is large, the central limit
theorem applies and the sampling
distribution of the mean will be normal.
Hypothesis Testing Proportions

 Involves categorical variables

 Two possible outcomes
 “Success” (possesses a certain characteristic)
 “Failure” (does not possesses that
characteristic)
 Fraction or proportion of the population in
the “success” category is denoted by π
Hypothesis Testing Proportions
 Sample proportion in the success category is denoted by p

X number of successes in sample

p 
n sample size
 When both nπ and n(1-π) are at least 5, p can be
approximated by a normal distribution with mean and
standard deviation
 (1   )
μp  σp 
n
Hypothesis Testing Proportions

 The sampling distribution of p is

approximately normal, so the test statistic is
a Z value:

p 
Z
 (1   )
n
 Hypothesis Testing Proportions
Example
A marketing company claims that it receives 8%
responses from its mailing. To test this claim, a
random sample of 500 were surveyed with 30
responses. Test at the  = .05 significance level.

First, check:
n π = (500)(.08) = 40
n(1-π) = (500)(.92) = 460
 Hypothesis Testing Proportions
Example

H0: π = .08 H1: π ≠ .08 Determine region of rejection

α = .05
Reject Reject
n = 500, p = .06

Critical Values: ± 1.96 .025 .025

0 z
-1.96 1.96
 Hypothesis Testing Proportions
Example
Test Statistic: Decision:
p  .06  .08 Do not reject H0 at
Z   1.648
 (1   ) .08(1  .08)  = .05
n 500 Conclusion:
There isn’t sufficient
evidence to reject the
.025 .025
company’s claim of
0 z 8% response rate.
-1.96 1.96
-1.646
 Potential Pitfalls and Ethical
Considerations
 Use randomly collected data to reduce selection
biases
 Do not use human subjects without informed
consent
 Choose the level of significance, α, before data
collection
 Do not employ “data snooping” to choose between
one-tail and two-tail test, or to determine the level of
significance
 Do not practice “data cleansing” to hide
observations that do not support a stated hypothesis
 Report all pertinent findings