0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views54 pages

Strategy Execution & Balanced Scorecard

The document discusses strategy execution and the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a strategic management tool, emphasizing the importance of aligning internal capabilities with external opportunities. It outlines various frameworks, including SWOT analysis and the Five P's of strategy, and highlights the role of organizational learning and knowledge management in enhancing strategic implementation. Additionally, it details the BSC's four perspectives and its application in projects like India Post's Project Arrow to improve service quality and operational efficiency.

Uploaded by

Ravindra Tilekar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views54 pages

Strategy Execution & Balanced Scorecard

The document discusses strategy execution and the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a strategic management tool, emphasizing the importance of aligning internal capabilities with external opportunities. It outlines various frameworks, including SWOT analysis and the Five P's of strategy, and highlights the role of organizational learning and knowledge management in enhancing strategic implementation. Additionally, it details the BSC's four perspectives and its application in projects like India Post's Project Arrow to improve service quality and operational efficiency.

Uploaded by

Ravindra Tilekar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

XLRI Jamshedpur

March 2019

Strategy Execution
& Balanced Scorecard

Prof Saurabh Pandya


Faculty, Strategic Management, XLRI Jamshedpur
MBA – NMIMS (Mumbai) | FPM (PhD) – IIM Bangalore
[email protected]
Strategy
• SWOT –
generally
What a company might do? – a starting
Opportunities and Threats point of
all
What a Strategic
company can Thinking
do?
(Strengths &
Weaknesses) • Creating
a fit
between
internal
and
external
Categorizing Decisions

How to tell which decisions are strategic, Ram Shivakumar (California Management Review)
“SWOT” ANALYSIS & “LISA” FRAMEWORK
SWOT analysis – Traditional approach

Strengths Opportunities
I E
N X
T T
E E
R R
N N
A A
L L

Weaknesses Threats
SWOT analysis – LISA framework
Strengths Opportunities

Create a “Fit”

Leverage Seize

Weaknesses Threats

Reduce vulnerability

Improve Awareness
Strategy and Purpose
• Puzzle versus Perspective & Purpose
• A firm’s unique added value defines its “Purpose”
– give direction to every part of the firm
• Purpose – will help people understand:
• What kind of knowledge is critical
• What to learn to improve performance
• Creativity, insight and the ability to make
judgements about various issues
• Keeping all the parts of the company in a proper
balance, while moving the company forward
Strategy Implementation
• Goals  Execution  Results
• “Philosophers are good strategists, but don’t
have the capability to translate that strategy into
action” – Larry Bossidy (GE, Allied Signal, Honeywell)
• Linking the three core processes of execution –
People, Strategy & Operations  Performance
Some key points
• Execution is a discipline, integral to strategy
• Execution is the major job of the business leader
• Must be a core element of a company’s culture
STRATEGY PROCESSES
Five P’s for Strategy
• Plan – intended / deliberate
• Ploy – one-time move
• Pattern – “emergent strategy”

• Position – creating a “fit”


• Perspective – top management view

Five Ps for Strategy by Henry Mintzberg (California Management Review)


Recall a Decision / Strategy
• What was the decision / strategy? What was the
initial plan and timeline?
• New opportunities while implementing?
Influence on the original decision / strategy?
• Challenges faced in execution? Actions to
overcome them?
• Final outcome? Please note one or two major
deviations from the original decision / strategy
Emergent Strategy Process
The Process of Strategy Development and Implementation by Christensen & Donovan
ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING &
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Organizational Learning…
• The theory behind Knowledge Management
• Learning Organizations (levels) – combination of
• individual learning
• team / group learning
• organizational learning
• inter-organizational learning (in a network/sector)
• Learning modes
• Cognitive – changes in intellectual concepts or
frameworks, at individual or group level
• Cultural – group-based values or concepts
• Behavioural / Action-based – action followed by a
process of critical reflection
Organizational Learning…
• Two types of learning
• Single-loop – incremental changes in a framework
• Double-loop – existing theories/assumptions are
questioned and reflected on (challenging the
Theory of the Business, i.e. TOB)
• Theory of Business by Peter Drucker (HBR, 1994)
• Key assumptions in the mind of the top
management about the organization’s reality:
• Environment
• Mission
• Core competencies
Organizational Learning…
• Various types of learning in a continuum (the
effort, implications & usability keeps going up)
• Improvisational learning – one instance
• Trial-and-error learning – short-term corrections
• Experimental learning – designed for long-term
• Experiential learning – cuts across the other
forms – learning based on some experiences
(hands-on)
 Effort, Implications & Usability 

Improvisation Trial-and-error Experimentation


Organizational Learning
Some concepts:
• Unlearning, Learning and Change
• Unlearning antecedents
• individual-level and organizational-level
• Organizational routines
• habits or processes done without much thought
going into it
• Organizational memory
• all the learning that stays embedded within
organizations – can be used in the future
• Organizational forgetting
• deliberate vs memory loss
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Types of Knowledge
• Explicit knowledge – Can be codified & transferred
through documents
• Tacit knowledge – Transferred through experience
and sharing (more hands-on learning)
• Creation and Transfer of knowledge
• Distilling from tacit knowledge and making it explicit
• Using the learning from explicit knowledge and
adding back (more) to the tacit

The Knowledge-creating Company by Ikujiro Nonaka (HBR)


The Knowledge Spiral (S-A-C-I)
• Socialization
• Learning/gathering the tacit knowledge
• Articulation
• Translating tacit knowledge to explicit knowledge
that can be communicated
• Combination
• Standardizing the explicit knowledge in a manual
• Internalization
• Using the overall experience to enrich the tacit
knowledge base
KM Strategies
Codification Personalization
• Re-use Economics • Expert Economics
• P2D • P2P
• (People-to-Documents) • (Person-to-Person)
• IT investment – Heavy • IT investment – Moderate
• HR strategies: • HR strategies:
• Solutions • Problem solving
• CBTs • Mentoring
• Using / contributing to • Knowledge sharing
databases
Implications of KM for Strategy…
• A company’s KM strategy should reflect its
competitive strategy
• How it creates value for its customers?
• How does that value support an economic model?
• How do the company’s people deliver on the value
& the economics?
• Asking these questions may help:
• Standardized or customised product?
• Mature or innovative product?
Do the employees rely on
• Explicit or tacit knowledge to solve problems?
Implications of KM for Strategy
• Do not isolate knowledge management, e.g. in the HR
or IT department
• Coordination requires leadership of the management
• Get the incentives right – as per the KM strategy –
e.g. rewards for adding to the database versus
rewards for giving personal advice & mentoring
• The IT investment should be appropriate to the KM
strategy – storage vs communication
• Do not straddle – but 80-20 may be applicable
• One can be the dominant strategy & the other can be
the support strategy
STRATEGY SCORECARD
(BALANCED SCORECARD)
AN INTRODUCTION
Performance Measurement
• Individual versus Corporate
• Individual
• Target-setting to Performance Appraisal process
• Corporate
• Traditional performance measures – profitability
ratios – lagging indicators
• Strategy Scorecard – leading indicators
• Can also be called Balanced Scorecard (introduced
by Kaplan & Norton in early 1990s)
• Modified scorecard versions – HR, Sustainability
Balanced Scorecard (BSC)
• Performance measurement –> Performance
management –> Strategic Management tool
• Provides a more comprehensive assessment of
the state of the organization
• Revolutionized conventional thinking about
performance metrics
• It is a misnomer that BSC is an HR tool – actually
a Strategy tool applicable to entire organization
• But HR department is generally the custodian
and implementer of this tool
• Vision & Strategy is at the core
A bridge between the present and
the future (Knowing-Doing gap)
• Addresses gap between an organization’s strategies
and their implementation by employees
• Link a company’s long-term strategies with short-
term actions
• Not a replacement for financial measures, but their
complement
• Track financial results
• Monitor progress in building the capabilities and
acquiring the intangible assets needed for future
growth
• Ability to exploit intangible assets > Ability to invest
in and manage physical assets
Financial & Strategic Objectives*
Financial Objectives Strategic Objectives
• ‘x’ % increase in revenues • ‘x’ % market share
• ‘x’ % inc. in profits (PAT) • Lower costs than rivals
• ‘x’ % inc. in EPS • Better quality & customer
• ‘x’ % inc. in dividend payout service
• ‘x’ % profit margin • ‘x’ % revenues from sale
• ‘x’ % ROE or ROCE of new products
• Broader or deeper
• Increased shareholder value
technological capabilities
(upward stock price)
• Wider product line
• Bond / credit ratings of ‘x’
• Better brand name
• Internal cash flow of ‘x’
• Stronger S&D capabilities
* Crafting & Executing Strategy (19e) by • New product introduction
Cascading nature of balanced scorecard
Four Characteristics of a BSC*
These distinctive features make the BSC more than just
a measurement system
• It is a top-down reflection of the company’s mission
(vision) and strategy
• It is forward-looking
• It integrates external and internal measures
• It helps a company focus
Thus, it serves as a means for motivating and
implementing breakthrough performance

*Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work by Kaplan & Norton


(HBR, 1993)
BSC Constituents / Perspectives
Four constituents or Components (OMTI)
perspectives of a BSC within each of the four
• Financial constituents
• Marketing • Objectives
(Customer) • Measures
• Internal Business • Targets
Process
• Initiatives
• Learning & Growth
(knowledge &
innovation)
“To achieve External
our vision,
how should Objective Measures Targets Initiatives
we appear to s
our
customers?”

“To satisfy Internal business process


our
“To succeed Financial shareholders Objectives Measure Targets Initiatives
financially & customers s
how should Objectives Measure Targets Initiatives
s what
we appear Vision & business
to our Strategy processes
shareholders must we
?” excel at?”

“To achieve Learning and growth


our vision,
how will we Objectives Measure Targets Initiatives
sustain our s
ability to
change and
improve?”
BSC Perspectives – Questions to Ask
It is about translating vision & strategy through four
perspectives
• Financial
• How should we appear to our shareholders?
• Marketing (Customer)
• How do customers view us?
• Internal Business Process (IBP)
• What processes must we excel at?
• (to satisfy shareholders & customers)
• Learning & Growth (L&G)
• Can we continue to improve and create value?
Balancing the Scorecard
1. Rationale for using a Balanced Scorecard
2. Understand your organization’s objectives in
deciding which measures to use – narrow down
3. Dominated by historical financial information?

• Criticisms of the BSC


• Excludes suppliers and employee satisfaction
• Linkages to stakeholder management
• Important in the context of corporate governance
and sustainability
BALANCED SCORECARD
INDIA POST – PROJECT ARROW
India Post – Project Arrow – 2008-09
• World’s largest network with more than 150,000 post
offices
• Core and additional services – postal delivery (core),
insurance, banking, mutual funds etc.
• Need of the times – greater customer focus
• Project Arrow – integrated and all-inclusive approach
• Balanced Scorecard used to identify key perspectives,
decide objectives, develop metrics and collect & analyze
data accordingly
• Four perspectives that Project Arrow can be seen through
– Financial, Customer, Internal Processes and Learning
and Growth
Project Arrow – Scorecard…
• Financial
• Broaden revenue mix with new growth areas
• Retain market share in core business
• Lower operating costs and increase productivity
• Marketing / Customer
• Improve speed and reliability of core service
• Increase service levels for other businesses
• Enhance customer experience at branches and
overall customer satisfaction
Project Arrow – Scorecard
• Internal processes
• Increase productivity and operational efficiency
• Increase use of IT
• Feedback mechanism through two-way
communication
• Performance appraisal
• Learning and growth
• Build infrastructure for long-term growth
• Physical, human (social) & information
infrastructure
Project Arrow – Implementation
• Objective
• Provide service quality with global benchmarks at
lowest cost
• Pilot study in 2008-09 with 50 branches across 10
postal circles (later extended & scaled up)
• Core Strategy (data till 2012-13 approx.)
• Get the core right (around 20,000 branches)
• Modernize look and feel (approx. 2500 branches)
• Strategy Map included four perspectives –
• Customer, Linked issues, Internal processes and
Learning & Knowledge
BALANCED SCORECARD
AS A STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
Managing Strategy:
The Four Processes*
BSC can help senior managers systematically link
current actions with tomorrow’s goals

1. Translating the Vision


2. Communication and Linking
3. Business Planning
4. Feedback and Learning

*Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management


System by Kaplan & Norton (HBR, 1996 & 2007)
Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System by Kaplan &
Norton (HBR, 1996 & 2007)
1. Translating the Vision
• Objectives & Measures – describe the long-term
drivers of success
• Clarify the vision
• Build a consensus around vision & strategy
• Guides to action – in operational terms – easier
for the people at the grass-roots level who are
actually responsible for executing the strategy
• “…provide services that surpass customers’ needs”
• “…provide superior service to targeted customers”
• Helps identify gaps in skills and systems
2. Communicating & Linking
• Involving multiple layers of management
• The senior executives (top management team)
can formulate the financial and customer
objectives and delegate the IBP and L&G
objectives to the next level of management
• IBP and L&G objectives should drive the
achievement of financial and customer goals, e.g.
• Customers’ expectations of on-time delivery
• Improving IBP of order processing, scheduling and
fulfilment
BSC Users and Three Activities
• Communicating and educating
• Brochures, newsletters, town halls, bulletin boards
• Should also allow employees to make suggestions for
achieving or exceeding targets
• External stakeholders?
• Setting goals and objectives
• Department and individual objectives to be aligned to the
long-term strategy
• Personal scorecard – corporate, business unit &
individual/team measures
• Linking rewards & incentives to performance measures
• Multiple objectives in compensation formula
• Weights for each objective versus Critical subset
3. Business Planning
• Setting targets
• Aligning strategic initiatives
• Link financial budgets with strategic goals
• BSC ensures that the budget supports the strategies
• Managing various change programs – e.g.
reengineering, employee empowerment, TQM, etc.
• Compete for scarce resources
• Time, attention & resources of the top management
• Establishing milestones (tangible expressions of
managers’ beliefs – Theory of the Business)
• Continually test the theory & the implementation
4. Feedback and Learning
• Real-time learning helps to modify strategies
• Single-loop learning – no re-examination of
strategies or techniques of implementation –
deviations are defects to be remedied
• Double-loop learning – produces a change in
people’s assumptions and theories about cause-
and-effect relationships
• First three processes – single-loop learning
• Vital to implementing strategy, but not sufficient
in unpredictable and turbulent environment
Strategic Learning & BSC…
• Only Budget reviews (variance analysis) and other
financial management tools cannot engage senior
executives in double-loop learning –
• They address performance from only one
perspective
• They don’t involve “strategic learning”
• Strategic learning refers to organizational learning
at the executive level, and consists of –
• Gathering feedback
• Testing the hypothesis on which strategy was based
• Making the necessary adjustments
Strategic Learning & BSC
BSC & the elements essential to strategic learning
• Articulates the company’s shared vision
• defines results that the company is trying to
achieve jointly (as a team)
• links individual and business unit
• Supplies the strategic feedback system – test,
validate & modify the strategies, i.e. the
hypotheses about cause-and-effect relationships
• Measuring the strength of the linkages among
“measures” in the different “perspectives”
• Facilitates strategy review for strategic learning
Strategy Scorecard – A Summary
• Clarify and update strategy
• Communicate strategy throughout the company
• Align unit and individual goals with the strategy
• Link strategic objectives to long-term targets and
annual budgets
• Identify and align strategic initiatives
• Conduct periodic performance reviews – learn
about and improve strategy
Strategy Scorecard or BSC helps align the
management processes and focus the entire
organization on implementing long-term strategy!
Thank You!!!

You might also like