美國人權:修订间差异
删除的内容 添加的内容
Newerdrawn(留言 | 贡献) 修改內容增加嚴謹性 |
Newerdrawn(留言 | 贡献) 精確化表述 |
||
第8行:
| chapter = A Human Rights Lens on U.S. History: Human Rights at Home and Human Rights Abroad | volume = III | page = 4 | publisher = Praeger Publishers | year = 2007 | isbn = 0-275-98824-4}}</ref><ref>Brennan, William, J., ed. Schwartz, Bernard, The Burger Court: counter-revolution or confirmation?, Oxford University Press US, 1998, {{ISBN|0-19-512259-3}}, page 10</ref>、州宪法、国际法、联邦州份法案保障的权利。除法律保障外,美国人权更受公民倡议和公投保障。美国联邦法院有权审理国际人权法,并视国际法为[[美国法律]]。<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3655/is_199807/ai_n8788427/pg_4/?tag=content;col1|title=Human rights in the United States courts: The role of lawyers|last=Schneebaum|first=Steven M. |date=Summer 1998|publisher=Washington & Lee Law Review|accessdate=June 10, 2009}}</ref>
美国的人权状况备受争议,受到了国际方面的广泛批评<ref>{{cite web|date=2020|title=United States|url=https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/united-states|publisher=Human Rights Watch}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=2011|title=The top 100 offenders|newspaper=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/Tables/4_col_tables/0,,258330,00.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=November 25, 2008|title=Global Human Rights Index|url=http://www.greenparty.org.uk/assets/files/reports/ReportHRI_-4-2.pdf|publisher=Green Party of UK|page=25}}</ref><ref name="Alston2">{{cite web|last=Alston|first=Philp|authorlink=Philip Alston|date=December 15, 2017|title=Statement on Visit to the USA, by Professor Philip Alston, United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights|url=http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=22533&LangID=E|access-date=December 20, 2017|website=|publisher=[[Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights|OHCHR]]}}</ref>。雖然[[人權]]在[[美国]]受法律保障及公眾認同,但[[死刑]]、族群政策、[[持枪权]]、[[警察暴力]]等威胁仍
[[德国之声]]在对2005年美国发布的外国年度人权报告进行评论时认为,尽管[[美国媒体]]享受充分的自由使得政府的行为受到监督,但是这个监督机制并不能完全杜绝践踏人权的现象。由于在[[反恐战争]]中的[[关塔那摩]][[美军虐囚事件|虐囚事件]],美国在人权问题上的公信力正在不断下降<ref>参见[[德国之声]]的评论文章 [http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,1928791,00.html 评论:美国人权法官威望大打折扣]。</ref>。
|