美國人權:修订间差异

删除的内容 添加的内容
修正筆誤
标签可视化编辑 移动版编辑 移动版网页编辑 高级移动版编辑
精確化表述
标签可视化编辑 移动版编辑 移动版网页编辑 高级移动版编辑
第8行:
| chapter = A Human Rights Lens on U.S. History: Human Rights at Home and Human Rights Abroad | volume = III | page = 4 | publisher = Praeger Publishers | year = 2007 | isbn = 0-275-98824-4}}</ref><ref>Brennan, William, J., ed. Schwartz, Bernard, The Burger Court: counter-revolution or confirmation?, Oxford University Press US, 1998, {{ISBN|0-19-512259-3}}, page 10</ref>、州宪法、国际法、联邦州份法案保障的权利。除法律保障外,美国人权更受公民倡议和公投保障。美国联邦法院有权审理国际人权法,并视国际法为[[美国法律]]。<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3655/is_199807/ai_n8788427/pg_4/?tag=content;col1|title=Human rights in the United States courts: The role of lawyers|last=Schneebaum|first=Steven M. |date=Summer 1998|publisher=Washington & Lee Law Review|accessdate=June 10, 2009}}</ref>
 
美国的人权状况备受争议,受到了国际方面的广泛批评<ref>{{cite web|date=2020|title=United States|url=https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/united-states|publisher=Human Rights Watch}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=2011|title=The top 100 offenders|newspaper=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/Tables/4_col_tables/0,,258330,00.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=November 25, 2008|title=Global Human Rights Index|url=http://www.greenparty.org.uk/assets/files/reports/ReportHRI_-4-2.pdf|publisher=Green Party of UK|page=25}}</ref><ref name="Alston2">{{cite web|last=Alston|first=Philp|authorlink=Philip Alston|date=December 15, 2017|title=Statement on Visit to the USA, by Professor Philip Alston, United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights|url=http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=22533&LangID=E|access-date=December 20, 2017|website=|publisher=[[Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights|OHCHR]]}}</ref>。雖然[[人權]]在[[美国]]受法律保障及公眾認同,但[[死刑]]、族群政策、[[持枪权]]、[[警察暴力]]等威胁仍存在。PBS newsHour報導稱,美国有人因無法支付罰款而入獄;<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/return-debtors-prison/|title=Return of the debtors' prison? Many jailed for inability to pay fines|website=PBS NewsHour}}</ref>聯合國人權委員會等人權機構稱,美國窮人因無家可歸和隨地小便等原因被罰款或抓捕進行嚴酷的政策壓迫;<ref>[http://www.nlchp.org/U.N._Human_Rights_Committee_Calls_U.S._Criminalization_of_Homelessness_Cruel,_Inhuman,_and_Degrading.pdf U.N. Human Rights Committee Calls U.S. Criminalization of Homelessness "Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170824224248/https://www.nlchp.org/U.N._Human_Rights_Committee_Calls_U.S._Criminalization_of_Homelessness_Cruel,_Inhuman,_and_Degrading.pdf |date=August 24, 2017 }}. ''[[The National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty]],'' March 27, 2014. Retrieved May 12, 2014.</ref><ref>{{cite book|editor1-last= Haymes|editor1-first=Stephen |editor2-last= Vidal de Haymes|editor2-first= Maria|editor3-last= Miller|editor3-first= Reuben|title= The Routledge Handbook of Poverty in the United States |url= http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415673440|location=London |publisher= [[Routledge]]|date=2015|isbn= 978-0415673440|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=qnHfBQAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&pg=PA346#v=onepage&q&f=false 346]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= |first= |date=June 4, 2018|title="Contempt for the poor in US drives cruel policies," says UN expert|url=http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=23172&LangID=E|work=OHCHR|location= |access-date=July 28, 2018 }}</ref> 隱私國際的調研中稱,美國政府進行的大規模監控項目侵犯公民的隱私權。<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.privacyinternational.org/reports/surveillance-monitor-2007-international-country-rankings|title=|author=|date=|work=|publisher=|accessdate=|language=|format=}}</ref> {{Citation needed|警察有罪不罚和腐败, 监禁公民牟利,虐待囚犯,任何国家监狱系统中的少年人数最多,世界上最长的监狱徒刑,助长国家恐怖主义,|time=}}支持外国独裁者等方面也是引发质疑的重要原因。
 
[[德国之声]]在对2005年美国发布的外国年度人权报告进行评论时认为,尽管[[美国媒体]]享受充分的自由使得政府的行为受到监督,但是这个监督机制并不能完全杜绝践踏人权的现象。由于在[[反恐战争]]中的[[关塔那摩]][[美军虐囚事件|虐囚事件]],美国在人权问题上的公信力正在不断下降<ref>参见[[德国之声]]的评论文章 [http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,1928791,00.html 评论:美国人权法官威望大打折扣]。</ref>。