隔离但平等：修订间差异
删除的内容 添加的内容
第1行：
'''隔离但平等'''（{{lang-en|Separate but equal}}）是源自於19世紀[[美國黑人]][[种族隔离]]政策的一种表现形式，它试图通过为不同种族提供-{表}-面平等的设施或待遇，从而使实施空间隔离的做法[[合法性|合法化]]，遲至20世紀才取得平等性質的公民權。<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://americanhistory.si.edu/brown/history/1-segregated/separate-but-equal.html|title=Separate but Equal – Separate Is Not Equal|website=americanhistory.si.edu}}</ref>
20世紀末部分歐美國家開始重視[[同性戀]]權益，起初推行的同性[[民事結合]]或同性婚姻專門法（不適用一般婚姻法）亦被喻為另一種形式的"隔離但平等""。<ref name="hammond2009">{{Cite news|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/04/21/2009-04-21_why_civil_unions_arent_enough_in_gay_marriage_debate_separate_but_equal_wont_cut.html|title=Marriage is more perfect union: In gay marriage debate, separate but equal won't cut it|last=Hammond|first=Bill|work=Ny Daily News|date=2009-04-20|accessdate=2010-06-12|location=New York|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110925080454/http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/04/21/2009-04-21_why_civil_unions_arent_enough_in_gay_marriage_debate_separate_but_equal_wont_cut.html|archive-date=2011-09-25|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2009/04/why_the_word_marriage_matters.html|title=Why the word "marriage" matters|work=Oregon Live|last=Kitch|first=Mary|date=2009-04-21|accessdate=2010-06-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171208003202/http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2009/04/why_the_word_marriage_matters.html|archive-date=2017-12-08|dead-url=no}}</ref>
| |||