经济学人：修订间差异
删除的内容 添加的内容
Sharontse121（留言 | 贡献） |
补救6个来源，并将0个来源标记为失效。) #IABot (v2.0.8.8 |
||
第24行：
| website = {{URL|http://www.economist.com/}}
| circulation = 909,476（紙質版）<br />748,459（數字版）
| circulation_date = 2019年7月至12月<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.abc.org.uk/product/432|title=The Economist|publisher=Audit Bureau of Circulations|date=2019|accessdate=2019-12-31|archive-date=2022-07-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220702090231/https://www.abc.org.uk/product/432}}</ref>
}}
《'''經濟學人'''》（{{lang-en|''The Economist''}}）是一份[[英國]]的英文新聞週報，分八個版本面向全球發行，其編輯部位於[[倫敦]]。它在1843年9月由[[詹姆士·威爾遜 (商人)|詹姆士·威爾遜]]創辦<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.economistgroup.com/contact/index.html|title=Locations|work=經濟學人集團|accessdate=2009-09-12|language=en|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090212191438/http://www.economistgroup.com/contact/index.html|archivedate=2009-02-12}}</ref>。在創辦之初，《經濟學人》以報紙版式發行；時至今日，儘管它已經採用小[[開本]]、亚光紙的[[雜誌]]版式出版，但它依然沿用舊時的習慣，將自己稱為「[[報紙]]」<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/09/economist-explains-itself |work=經濟學人 |title=Why does The Economist call itself a newspaper? |date=2013-09-01 |language=en |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140315194046/http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/09/economist-explains-itself |archivedate=2014-03-15 }}</ref>。2017年上半年，《經濟學人》實體和數字刊物的平均每周發行量合共達到144萬份，其中近六成發行量位於[[北美]]地區<ref name=circu>{{cite web |url=https://press.economist.com/stories/11458-the-economists-circulation-revenue-increased-by-21-year-on-year-as-latest-abc-figures-show-profitable-volume-growth |title=The Economist’s Circulation Revenue Increased by 21% Year on Year as Latest ABC Figures Show Profitable Volume Growth |publisher=經濟學人 |date=2017-08-10 |accessdate=2017-08-22 |language=en |deadurl=no |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170822180433/https://press.economist.com/stories/11458-the-economists-circulation-revenue-increased-by-21-year-on-year-as-latest-abc-figures-show-profitable-volume-growth |archivedate=2017-08-22 }}</ref>}}。
第235行：
==争议==
1993年6月，OTIS公司的执行董事安利威朱帝接受《经济学人》访问时表示，该公司不在[[马来西亚]]首都[[吉隆坡]]投资，而选择在马来西亚另一城市[[槟城]]投资六千万[[美元]]，是因为槟城是个[[华人]]占大多数的地区，该公司从事电梯生产。对此时任[[马来西亚首相]][[马哈迪·莫哈末]]表示这种说法反映思想狭隘，并表示如果要选择在华人占大多数的地方投资，该名投资家大可到[[中国大陆]]。时任[[檳城首席部長|槟城首席部长]][[許子根|许子根]]也形容《经济学人》的报导怀有不良意图，且意在混淆视听。根据报导，OTIS马来西亚分行也于较后致函《经济学人》，对上述混淆人们表达不满，并认为有关谈话被错误注释和有失准确<ref>{{Cite web|title=外商在槟投资是因华人聚居？ 首相：思想狭隘|url=https://davidchenlib.org/viewer/5529/?back=/records/listing?search=Mahathir+1993&sort=_score&perpage=10&page=1&fulltext=1&bookmarks=1&&css-name=include#page=222&viewer=picture&o=&n=0&q=|access-date=|date=1993年6月4日|work=《[[星洲日报]]》|archive-date=2021年11月1日|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211101031733/https://davidchenlib.org/viewer/5529/?back=%2Frecords%2Flisting%3Fsearch%3DMahathir+1993&sort=_score&perpage=10&page=1&fulltext=1&bookmarks=1&&css-name=include#page=222&viewer=picture&o=&n=0&q=}}</ref>。
2012年，《經濟學人》被指侵入了[[孟加拉]]最高法院法官{{link-en|穆罕默德·胡格|Mohammed Nizamul Huq}}的電腦並發佈其私人郵件，最終導致胡格辭去了{{link-en|孟加拉國際戰犯法庭|International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh)}}首席法官的職務。該報否認了指控<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2012/12/bangladesh|title=Bangladesh: Discrepancy in Dhaka|work=經濟學人|date=2012-12-08|language=en|accessdate=2017-07-23|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170801193836/http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2012/12/bangladesh|archivedate=2017-08-01}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21568349-week-chairman-bangladeshs-international-crimes-tribunal-resigned-we-explain|title=Trying war crimes in Bangladesh: The trial of the birth of a nation|work=經濟學人|date=2012-12-15|language=en|accessdate=2017-07-23|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170703104929/https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21568349-week-chairman-bangladeshs-international-crimes-tribunal-resigned-we-explain|archivedate=2017-07-03}}</ref>。
第241行：
2014年，在受到猛烈批評後，《經濟學人》撤下了一篇對美國歷史學家{{link-en|愛德華·巴提斯特|Edward E. Baptist}}著作的書評。該書以[[奴隸制]]和美國[[資本主義]]為題材。《經濟學人》在最初的書評裡批評道：「他的書中幾乎所有黑人都是受害者，而幾乎所有白人都是反派。」<ref>{{Cite news|title=American slavery: Blood cotton|url=http://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21615482-how-slaves-built-american-capitalism-blood-cotton|work=經濟學人|date=2014-09-05|accessdate=2014-09-06|quote=Almost all the blacks in his book are victims, almost all the whites villains.|language=en|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140906024408/http://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21615482-how-slaves-built-american-capitalism-blood-cotton|archivedate=2014-09-06}}</ref>巴提斯特認為，這樣的負面評價是源於該報對「{{link-en|市場原教旨主義|Market fundamentalism}}」的篤信，即認為獲利能力是評價一切事物的最佳標準<ref>{{cite web|first=Edward|last=Baptist|date=2014-09-07|url=http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/09/economist-review-slavery-110687.html|title=What the ''Economist'' Doesn't Get About Slavery—And My Book|work=Politico|accessdate=2015-06-20|language=en|deadurl=no|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150507232732/http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/09/economist-review-slavery-110687.html|archivedate=2015-05-07}}</ref>。
2022年，《經濟學人》刊發《世界上大部分糧食並非被人類吃掉》推特貼文，將糧食用作畜牧飼料和生活燃料的行為加劇了本就嚴峻的全球糧食危機問題，並將豬所食用的糧食總量和中國人消耗量相提並論。此番言論引來中國媒體、網民強烈不滿。<ref>{{cite news |title=《經濟學人》稱「豬比中國人吃得多」 CGTN主持人回敬：人寫不出這種話 |url=https://hd.stheadline.com/news/realtime/chi/2350554/%E5%8D%B3%E6%99%82-%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B-%E7%B6%93%E6%BF%9F%E5%AD%B8%E4%BA%BA-%E7%A8%B1-%E8%B1%AC%E6%AF%94%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E4%BA%BA%E5%90%83%E5%BE%97%E5%A4%9A-CGTN%E4%B8%BB%E6%8C%81%E4%BA%BA%E5%9B%9E%E6%95%AC-%E4%BA%BA%E5%AF%AB%E4%B8%8D%E5%87%BA%E9%80%99%E7%A8%AE%E8%A9%B1 |accessdate=2022-06-29 |work=頭條日報 |date=2022-06-29 |archive-date=2022-07-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220704011839/https://hd.stheadline.com/news/realtime/chi/2350554/%E5%8D%B3%E6%99%82-%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B-%E7%B6%93%E6%BF%9F%E5%AD%B8%E4%BA%BA-%E7%A8%B1-%E8%B1%AC%E6%AF%94%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E4%BA%BA%E5%90%83%E5%BE%97%E5%A4%9A-CGTN%E4%B8%BB%E6%8C%81%E4%BA%BA%E5%9B%9E%E6%95%AC-%E4%BA%BA%E5%AF%AB%E4%B8%8D%E5%87%BA%E9%80%99%E7%A8%AE%E8%A9%B1 }}</ref>[[中國日報]]歐洲分社社長陳衛華率先回懟，發推特表示經濟學人雜誌是由「一群豬」開辦的，「一群種族主義的豬」；[[中國環球電視網]]主持人[[劉欣 (主持人)|劉欣]]怒斥並表示「人寫不出這種話」。<ref>{{cite web |author1=陳衛華 Chen Weihua |title=The Economist magazine is clearly owned and run by a drove of pigs. Racist pigs. |url=https://twitter.com/chenweihua/status/1541794234071715844 |website=推特 Twitter |accessdate=2022-06-29 |archive-date=2022-06-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220630185033/https://twitter.com/chenweihua/status/1541794234071715844 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=外媒：「豬比中國人吃得多」 |url=https://news.sina.com.tw/article/20220629/42113768.html |accessdate=2022-06-29 |work=北京新浪網 |date=2022-06-29 |archive-date=2022-07-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220702091637/https://news.sina.com.tw/article/20220629/42113768.html }}</ref>事件發酵後，經濟學人已刪除有關貼文並重新發布，唯此舉未能平息網民怒火，新帖評論區充斥批評該媒體的貼文。<ref>{{cite web |title=Humans ate just 13% of global maize output in 2019 |url=https://twitter.com/TheEconomist/status/1541999124844773379 |website=推特 Twitter |publisher=經濟學人 The Economist |accessdate=2022-06-29 |archive-date=2022-06-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220630185033/https://twitter.com/TheEconomist/status/1541999124844773379 }}</ref>
== 參考資料 ==
| |||