User talk:Bobamnertiopsis
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 01:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token 8cd57ff48f685209bd714de3f0d60ebb
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:6-OHDA.svg was uncategorized on 26 September 2009.
Northern Sea Route vs Southern Sea Route
[edit]I helped you with this Northern Sea Route vs Southern Sea Route. --Keepscases (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Putin_at_the_ceremony_of_opening_the_gas_pipeline.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 09:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Article_Barnstar.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cholo Aleman (talk) 05:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:The7thCircle2.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:The7thCircle2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 18:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Dog-gone-green_statue.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
BrokenSphere (Talk) 01:55, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Outlook_Twenty_Ten.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—innotata 15:51, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Nokomis Library 1970s.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nokomis Library 1970s.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Nokomis Library 1970s.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
—innotata 02:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Suvplustrain.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Suvplustrain.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:36, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
File:ToshibaSatellite100CS.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Liliana-60 (talk) 18:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Bobamnertiopsis, please research the copyright status of the depicted artwork. If you cannot prove that it is free of copyright, we cannot keep this picture at Commons as we do not have freedom of panorama in the United States. --AFBorchert (talk) 05:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
3 files
[edit]Hi Bobamnertiopsis, you recently posted three deletion notices on my page concerning the same number of files. These files were taken from videos published on youtube under the "Standard youTube License", which is a Creative Commons license. All three files were taken from videos published by their original owners and not from third parties, as I specified it on all of their descriptions. Since you provided no specific reason on why they were deleted, I am contacting you to kindly ask you for such reasons, since a general deletion notice explains nothing on that decision. Thank you in advance. Cheers! ~ KKCO Sol Jaguar | Let's talk 12:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Good day, Soljaguar! I'm sorry I had to post deletion notices for the files in question but permit me to explain why I did so. You're correct that the videos were published on YouTube by their original owners and not third parties and you're also correct that they were published under the Standard YouTube License, which can be seen on the video's page by clicking "Show more" in the "About" section. However, the Standard YouTube License is not Creative Commons. I wish it were; that would make the jobs of everyone working on Commons and Wikipedia so much easier. Alas, though, it's not. Now, there are videos on the site that are licensed CC-BY which are denoted by "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)" in the "License" field in the "About" section. For example, I recently uploaded this image of a candidate for mayor in my hometown, an image which was screencapped from this YouTube video which you can check and see has a Creative Commons license. The other big giveaway is the large button in the "About" section that says "Remix this video!" Now you might try to find some images from CC-licensed videos by doing a YouTube search, then clicking "Filters" and selecting "creative commons" from the "Features" column. I hope this helps to answer your question; if you've got any other questions, don't hesitate to ask! Thanks, Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 14:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi! Thank you for your quick and illustrative answer. I might have misunderstood some of the terms described there. I just did a search with filters as suggested and found a couple videos that could be ok. Before I start working on them, I'd like you to please take a look at them and tell me your non-committal opinion about them: video no. 1 and video no. 2. Thank you in advance. Cheers! ~ KKCO Sol Jaguar | Let's talk 18:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell, both of those videos are suitable! Screencap away, friend! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 19:25, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
hi. This image is licensed Flickr 2.0 Carlos (talk) 16:13, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- From the image's description: "Photo by Magssannguaq Qujaukitsoq. Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0). This photo may be used only for non-profit purposes, news media stories about Greenland, and marketing of Greenlandic tourist products (but no merchandise production or resale of photos)". Images uploaded from Flickr (and from anywhere else) must be licensed either Creative Commons Attribution or Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike or Public domain. However, images that include "NoDerivs" or "NonCommerical" are not suitable for upload on Wikimedia Commons because they are not considered to be truly free content. The easiest way to know if something is suitable for upload is to check the "Additional info" box in the bottom right corner of a Flickr page. Here's an image that you can see from the logo in the bottom corner is "Attribution" only, but on the images you uploaded, you can see in the bottom right corner that they're "Attribution NonCommercial No Derivative Works". Hope this helps! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 16:21, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello Bobamnertiopsis, maybe you already noted my edit here concerning the image mentioned above. Following to my edit at the dicussion page of the image you confirmed the data available on the mentioned date with the given license. Can you tell me how this worked? The URL "http://www.voanews.com/content/at-least-42-killed-in-egypt/1697063.html" in combination with the date "July 7" and author " S. Behn" is the only license information given in the image description. But the URL shows the article is dealing with the events of July 8th ("at-least-42-killed-in-egypt") and when you look at the article linked to this URL now, it is called "At Least 51 Killed in Egypt as Tensions Soar" yet and it is dealing with nothing else but the events of July 8th. So can we evaluate the given license information? What is the proof? Do you remember the article was originally dealing with events of July 7th? Greetings,--Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 02:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- I am sorry, it was my fault. Thanks for your quick, kind and outstanding thoroughly reply! Greetings,--Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 17:19, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States
[edit]Dear Bobamnertiopsis,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States. The images you uploaded will help illustrate Wikipedia articles on historic sites in the United States. We are delighted to share the winning images and our top 10 finalists with you.
Click here to read our press release and view the winning submissions »
We invite you to continue uploading images to Wikimedia Commons and we hope you will return for Wiki Loves Monuments again in September 2014. For more information about Wikimedia Commons, please visit our welcome page. For more information about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, please click here. Once again, thank you for sharing your images and participating in our contest.
—
Organizing Team
Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United States
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Bobamnertiopsis, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Bobamnertiopsis, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Bobamnertiopsis⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Bobamnertiopsis,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
OTRS permissions queues
[edit]Hello Bobamnertiopsis. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
File:APOD 2012 July 24 South Polar Vortex Discovered on Titan.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Amitie 10g (talk) 22:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sir, Re: ticket:2015052310007547 Thank you for getting the photos approved. I just went to my proposed article page and the photo, File:Steel little h covered in red velvet.png, has not been restored. How do I go about getting the photo back into the article? VTflatlander (talk) 22:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Re: ticket:2015052310007547
[edit]Dear Sir,
Thank you for getting the photos approved. I just went to my proposed article page and the photo, File:Steel little h covered in red velvet.png, has not been restored. How do I go about getting the photo back into the article? VTflatlander (talk) 22:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hey, VTflatlander. When I checked over your draft, it looked like you had managed to replace all three images so that's good. Just a heads up: works of art are italicized but not bolded in Wikistyle; only the subject's name is bolded (as you have correctly done in your draft). Good luck at AfC! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 02:03, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Please help restore deleted file Ticket. #2015042810006497
[edit]The Ticket for commons permission was raised as Ticket: Ticket#2015042810006497 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:YashD_Shooting_BSB_Kolkata_profile.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:YashD_full_profile_at_Bojhena_se_Bojhena_shoot.jpg
The files had been deleted by commons, please have a look and RESTORE the files In wiki commons. Please advice what steps are needed from user side. These were clicked by Me, as mentioned in permissions email.
- Hi, Mpadma. The concern in the deletion was that the image was first uploaded on Twitter and there was no mention of this in the Permissions email. Were you involved in sharing it on Twitter? (Also, don't forget to sign your posts.) Best, Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 16:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Please close the tickets
[edit]Bobamnertiopsis, please don't forget to close the tickets that vyou taken care and updated permissions (namely #2016042110000664. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Goodness, mea culpa! Sorry about that and thanks for catching my error. All the best, Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 19:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
A Jobbot for you!
[edit]OTRS barnstar | |
Thanks for helping with my (somewhat intricate) OTRS tickets! czar 01:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC) |
File:Women's march against Donald Trump, Saint Paul, Minnesota, January 21, 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
156.98.210.242 20:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Nekima Levy-Pounds, January 2015, v low res.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Țibrin (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
File:The1967greenbag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jcb (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Meek's Cutoff ensemble.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Small notebook gamer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BevinKacon (talk) 10:27, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Goodnightsleeps.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:09, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
File:GISHWHES 2013 No. 114 -- Chris Hardwick fruit.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
FredWalsh (talk) 23:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
File:GISHWHES 2013 No. 114 -- Chris Hardwick fruit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FredWalsh (talk) 12:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Amisulpride 2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 09:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Dido, Munich, May 2019 (1).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
RZuo (talk) 20:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Pherodactylus micromorphus reconstruction.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : GRuban.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, Collin, and thank you for the archive search, and the image in the first place. Nice to meet you! --GRuban (talk) 00:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- No worries GRuban! Thank you for reviewing the file. I was surprised to see it up for deletion and was perplexed to see that you were right, it was CC-BY-ND, but I'm glad we got to the bottom of it with some sleuthing! Kindly, Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 01:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
License review for YouTube file
[edit]Hello. I was wondering if you could do a license review for the media files below? A lot of the licenses in past YouTube video are being removed and it is worrying me that it will cause the files to be deleted if there is no proof that someone reviewed it. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fredo_2019.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jay_Critch_2018.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lil_Meech_in_2021.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:T.I._in_2020.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:G_Herbo_in_2021.png Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Shoot for the Stars, I've take a look at these; the last four look good but I'm not sure about the first one so I've tagged it for someone else to take a look at. Let me know if you have any others you'd like me to take a look at. Thanks! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 00:49, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! If you could please take a look at these files Shoot for the Stars (talk) 01:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC) :
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:24kgolden_in_2020.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fivio_in_2020.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GLC_in_2012.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blueface_in_Feb_2020.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lil_Tecca_2019.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Takeoff_performing_in_July_2021.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quavo_performing_in_July_2021.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anuel_AA_in_2022.png
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:50_Cent_in_2018.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoot for the Stars (talk • contribs) 01:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tate_McRae_2022.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoot for the Stars (talk • contribs) 01:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Shoot for the Stars, thanks, I've done what I can here. In future, you may wish to save the YouTube pages containing the CC-BY license at Archive.org manually to ensure their longevity, to tag images with the {{YouTubeReview}} template, and also note the timestamp in the video when you screencapped the still from. Let me know if there's anything else I can help with. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 22:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be so kind to review this picture uploaded by me? Thank you:) AlicjaBalicja (talk) 11:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- Done AlicjaBalicja, thanks for including the timestamp! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 03:44, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you:) AlicjaBalicja (talk) 15:13, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)