GhostInTheMachineTalkAllHelpMiscModulesOtherLayoutPhotosProjectsScriptsTidyingTidyingSDTODOUBXWIP2024-11-20 20:25:54

Talk archive • 20062008200920102011201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

This user knows that it can be a challenge to keep AGF in mind.

Tech News: 2024-45

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cornwall

edit

Hi, remember this? DuncanHill (talk) 10:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Not really, my brain simply cannot integrate such dissonance. How could we get this fixed? — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 21:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Short D[sic]escription

edit

I want to do more than a two-click thanks for this. As a user nearly as new as you, I had never noticed the "no-redirect" warning on the Short description doc. Noted. David Brooks (talk) 16:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can you please start a discussion on Talk:Liam Payne discography for this edit?

edit

Regarding this edit, I already reverted this edit you made last month. The article was already like this. There is no reason to remove the widths of columns—I maybe understand that adjusting text size isn't ideal, and I know all the accessibility guidelines around this, but the standard approach when an edit has been reverted is to go to the talk page for consensus per BRD. It would be appreciated if you could do this since you feel that strongly about it that you have returned to the article to make the same edit again. Thanks. Ss112 17:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Help from an administrator please

edit

It looks like the dab page PBF was "re-purposed" (on 2024-10-23, diff [4]) and then moved (on 2024-11-01) to create an article for Pakistan Business Forum. I have re-created the dab page and also removed the dab content from the new article, which looks OK on the surface, but leaves the dab page edit history attached to the "wrong" place. Is there a way to unwind the state of the PBF page so that it has a valid history, while leaving Pakistan Business Forum with enough history? — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 19:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Editors who do this kind of hijack-and-move as a way of creating new articles create more trouble than they probably realise, though this one is nowhere near as bad as some that I have seen. It will require separating the history of the dab page, the history of the repurposed page, and the history of an earlier page which had the same title. I'll get onto it. Thanks for pointing it out. When I've done that I'll look at the new article and see what needs to be done to that. At the least, it will probably need clean up to remove irrelevant history, and maybe more than just that. JBW (talk) 21:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
The references added to the article don't come near to establishing notability, so I've moved it to draft space and advised the editor who did it to work on it & then submit it as an AfC draft. JBW (talk) 22:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for untangling everything — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 07:44, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-46

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Short Descriptions

edit

have you been changing short descriptions i made? 95.24.4.60 (talk) 15:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

That is possible, I change a lot of short descriptions — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 16:15, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alexander Shaouni (police officer)

edit

Messy article, and probably not notable, but it’s deleting without community input is likely to be highly controversial. Please take it to WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 02:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Be not afraid ... I do not have the power to delete it myself. I have "AfD"ed it instead — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 16:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-47

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 01:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Revert of my edit to Stanley Cohen (biochemist)

edit

You were perfectly correct. However, it was a typo, not deliberate vandalism. Athel cb Athel cb (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Such things happen. No worries. The edit summary says: "Reverting edit(s) by Athel cb (talk) to rev. 1244549467 by Smasongarrison: non-constructive (RW 16.1)" — Typos are mostly "non-constructive" rather than deliberate damage — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply