- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was IAR speedy delete as a gross invasion of privacy. Blueboy96 16:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Eglish Close (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. I accept that settlements are notable. However, this is not a settlement, it is not really an estate as described, it is just a street and not a long one at that - see here. I have not been able to trace any secondary sources that would grant notability. Delete. TerriersFan (talk) 15:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Very Strong Speedy Delete - Not only is it completely not notable, it being just a residential street, it is a gross invasion of people's privacy by informing the world who lives in what houses and how long they've loved there. Both delete it and remove the history to protect people's privacy. Canterbury Tail talk 15:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.