Intellectual need is a specific form of intrinsic motivation; it has been defined as "a learner’s subjective need to address a problem by learning something new."[1] It has been recognized as critical in effective education and learning. Intellectual need arises when a person experiences a problem leading to either out of curiosity or to solve a specific problem.[2][3]

Intellectual need is often greatest when there is a hole in an otherwise well-connected web of knowledge, where one has reached the limit of their knowledge and identified a knowledge gap.[2][4] Merely understanding a question and being unable to answer it is not sufficient to create intellectual need—intellectual need arises when a person believes the question to be interesting or important, and usually this involves fitting the question into a framework of well-understood ideas.

Mathematics professor Guershon Harel argues for a difference between motivation and intellectual need, stating that intellectual need does not have to do with one's interest or desire but rather epistemology and one's engagement in problems leading to learning. He has formulated the Necessity Principle, which states: "For students to learn [what] we intend to teach them, they must have a need for it, where 'need' here refers to intellectual need."[5]

A common critique of certain educational systems is that students are expected to learn facts and ideas in the absence of any intellectual need.[citation needed] As a result, the teachers and educational system must provide extrinsic motivation for the students in the form of tests, grades, or other incentives. This gives rise to a whole series of problems, ranging from boredom to academic dishonesty.

Examples

edit
  • A student who asks a question is displaying an intellectual need for the question to be answered.
  • A birdwatcher who cannot identify a certain bird will often have a strong intellectual need to identify that bird because it represents a hole in his or her knowledge; however, others might have no intellectual need, even though they also cannot identify the bird.[citation needed]
  • One can cultivate intellectual need by giving students a problem they can easily understand but cannot solve, or a question they can understand but cannot answer, before introducing a technique that can be used to solve the problem or information that answers the question.
  • If a student cannot understand a question or problem, it cannot provide intellectual need for a solution.
  • Giving students a new technique to solve a problem will not be effective if the students are already able to solve the problem through other easier or more enjoyable techniques, because they will have no intellectual need for the new technique.

See also

edit

References

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Harel, cited in Norton, Anderson; Arnold, Rachel; Kokushkin, Vladislav; Tiraphatna, Marcie (August 2023). "Addressing the Cognitive Gap in Mathematical Induction". International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. 9 (2): 295–321. doi:10.1007/s40753-022-00163-2. ISSN 2198-9745.
  2. ^ a b Lim, Kien H. (2009). "Provoking Intellectual Need". Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 15 (2): 92–99. doi:10.5951/MTMS.15.2.0092. ISSN 1072-0839. JSTOR 41182964.
  3. ^ Fuller, Evan; Rabin, Jeffrey M.; Harel, Guershon (n.d.). Intellectual Need and Problem-Free Activity in the Mathematics Classroom (PDF) (Report). University of California, San Diego. Retrieved 2024-02-02.
  4. ^ Grossnickle, Emily M. (March 2016). "Disentangling Curiosity: Dimensionality, Definitions, and Distinctions from Interest in Educational Contexts". Educational Psychology Review. 28 (1): 23–60. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9294-y. ISSN 1040-726X.
  5. ^ Harel, Guershon (December 2008). "A DNR perspective on mathematics curriculum and instruction. Part II: with reference to teacher's knowledge base". ZDM. 40 (5): 893–907. doi:10.1007/s11858-008-0146-4. ISSN 1863-9690.

Sources

edit