Jump to content

User talk:Clock 12:13: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 578678212 by Clock 12:13 (talk) still unsourced, no discussion on talk why WP:BURDEN does not apply
Line 28: Line 28:


You may not reinsert unsourced content to [[Kunchacko Boban]]. [[WP:BURDEN]] applies to ALL articles not just the articles that you have been previously warned about. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 11:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
You may not reinsert unsourced content to [[Kunchacko Boban]]. [[WP:BURDEN]] applies to ALL articles not just the articles that you have been previously warned about. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 11:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[WP:BLOCK|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[WP:REVERT|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[WP:TALK|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[WP:BRD|BRD]] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 11:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:34, 25 October 2013

Hai, I am clock. ha ha ha

October 2013

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.you are obviously not familiar with the sourcing that is typically used for computing articles. academic and news sources are almost never used, as such sources rarely exist for notable topics. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 15:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Teahouse logo

Hi Clock 12:13! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

removing tags from articles

Please do not delete tags or content with vague pretexts like "(cleaned up)" instead of a valid edit summary. If you must remove things, please honestly state what you are removing and why; if the edits are controversial, please attempt to gain consensus on the article talk page. K7L (talk) 04:28, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Information icon Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kunchacko Boban, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may not reinsert unsourced content to Kunchacko Boban. WP:BURDEN applies to ALL articles not just the articles that you have been previously warned about. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]