Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/AirFrance358: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
declined
Line 65: Line 65:


Supposed that I'm a sock of the aforementioned people, the articles Endroit provides for evidences are just random and irrelevant from any possible violation on 3RR except [[Kofun period]]‎ article. So please check it. I hope everything becomes clear soon. --[[User:Appletrees|Appletrees]] ([[User talk:Appletrees|talk]]) 15:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Supposed that I'm a sock of the aforementioned people, the articles Endroit provides for evidences are just random and irrelevant from any possible violation on 3RR except [[Kofun period]]‎ article. So please check it. I hope everything becomes clear soon. --[[User:Appletrees|Appletrees]] ([[User talk:Appletrees|talk]]) 15:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

*{{declined}} Evidence of collusion between Appletrees and Ecthelion83 is limited to two articles and one revert violation, so for now, insufficient basis to check. [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 16:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:13, 26 January 2008

AirFrance358

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 17:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

This is a violation of the "Parties reminded" remedy of the Arbcom case Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Liancourt Rocks. Revert-warring is occurring accross multiple articles, along nationalistic lines (Korea vs. Japan), and there appeared to be no civil discussion in the talk pages in most cases. (For the other side of the revert-war, see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KoreanShoriSenyou.) --Endroit (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is "the violation" done within your report? By your own standard from Japanese nationalistic party? I know you have been always suspected as a sockpuppet master by many people, so it is worth to include you in my report. So where are evidences that I'm the same person of Ecthelion83 and possible 3RR violation. You need to faithfully make differs on your suspected incidents, but no with this untidy mess. And why are you including yujacha article? It is rather much helpful for me to find out sockpuppetry of your party or you. As I see the old cases, I need to dig up the past reports on you as well. Cheers! --Appletrees (talk) 18:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  • Addition I suggested Endroit to make differs but he didn't. I think the inclusion of me appears to be arbitrary per Endroit's commnet at his talk page.[1]. He accused me of a sock of Ecthelion83 or banned user User:Appleby due to similar name. The case was actually irrelevant to Sea of Japan and AirFrance358.

I copy and paste these differs from 219.66.40.104 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)), 219.66.45.131 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))'s job who vandalized my report on Amazonefire. 4 times [2] [3]

1th rever 07:56, 7 January 2008 by Ecthelion83
2th rever 22:18, 7 January 2008 by Appletrees
3th rever 05:03, 8 January 2008 by Ecthelion83
4th rever 22:13, 8 January 2008 by Appletrees
5th rever 22:20, 8 January 2008 by Appletrees
6th rever 22:36, 8 January 2008 by Ecthelion83
7th rever 00:51, 9 January 2008 by Ecthelion83
8th rever 20:22, 10 January 2008 by Appletrees
9th rever 20:19, 14 January 2008 by Ecthelion83
10th rever 20:19, 14 January 2008 by Appletrees

Supposed that I'm a sock of the aforementioned people, the articles Endroit provides for evidences are just random and irrelevant from any possible violation on 3RR except Kofun period‎ article. So please check it. I hope everything becomes clear soon. --Appletrees (talk) 15:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • no Declined Evidence of collusion between Appletrees and Ecthelion83 is limited to two articles and one revert violation, so for now, insufficient basis to check. Thatcher 16:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/AirFrance358&oldid=187045421"