William McKinley

William McKinley
William McKinley
25th President of the United States
	In office; March 4, 1897 – September 14, 1901
Vice President	Garret Hobart (1897–1899); vacant (1899–1901); Theodore Roosevelt (1901);
Preceded by	Grover Cleveland
Succeeded by	Theodore Roosevelt
39th Governor of Ohio
	In office; January 11, 1892 – January 13, 1896
Lieutenant	Andrew Harris
Preceded by	James Campbell
Succeeded by	Asa Bushnell
Personal details
Born	January 29, 1843; Niles, Ohio, U.S.
Died	September 14, 1901 (aged 58); Buffalo, New York, U.S.
Political party	Republican
Spouse	Ida Saxton (1871–1901, survived as widow)
Children	Katherine, Ida (both died in early childhood)
Alma mater	Allegheny College, Albany Law School
Profession	Lawyer
Signature
Military service
Allegiance	United States; Union;
Branch/service	United States Army; Union Army;
Years of service	1861–1865
Rank	Captain; Brevet major;
Unit	23rd Ohio Infantry
Battles/wars	American Civil War

William McKinley (born William McKinley, Jr.; January 29, 1843 – September 14, 1901) was the 25th President of the United States, serving from March 4, 1897, until his death. McKinley led the nation to victory in the Spanish-American War, raised protective tariffs to promote American industry, and maintained the nation on the gold standard in a rejection of inflationary proposals. McKinley's administration ended with his assassination in September 1901, but his presidency began a period of over a third of a century dominated by the Republican Party.

McKinley served in the Civil War and rose from private to brevet major. After the war, he settled in Canton, Ohio, where he practiced law and married Ida Saxton. In 1876, he was elected to Congress, where he became the Republican Party's expert on the protective tariff, which he promised would bring prosperity. His 1890 McKinley Tariff was highly controversial; controversy over it, together with a Democratic redistricting aimed at gerrymanderinging him out of office, led to his defeat in the Democratic landslide of 1890. He was elected Ohio's governor in 1891 and 1893, steering a moderate course between capital and labor interests. With the aid of his close adviser Mark Hanna, he secured the Republican nomination for president in 1896, amid a deep economic depression. He defeated his Democratic rival, William Jennings Bryan, after a front-porch campaign in which he advocated "sound money" (the gold standard unless altered by international agreement) and promised that high tariffs would restore prosperity.

Rapid economic growth marked McKinley's presidency. He promoted the 1897 Dingley Tariff to protect manufacturers and factory workers from foreign competition, and in 1900, he secured the passage of the Gold Standard Act. McKinley hoped to persuade Spain to grant independence to rebellious Cuba without conflict, but when negotiation failed, he led the nation in the Spanish-American War of 1898; the U.S. victory was quick and decisive. As part of the peace settlement Spain was required to turn over its main overseas colonies of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines; Cuba was promised independence but at that time remained under the control of the U.S. Army. The independent Republic of Hawaii joined the U.S. in 1898 as a territory.

McKinley defeated Bryan again in the 1900 presidential election, in a campaign which focused on imperialism, prosperity, and free silver. President McKinley was assassinated by an anarchist in September 1901, and was succeeded by Vice President Theodore Roosevelt. Historians regard McKinley's 1896 victory as a realigning election, in which the political stalemate of the post-Civil War era gave way to the Republican-dominated Fourth Party System, which began with the Progressive Era. He is generally placed near the middle in rankings of American presidents.

Early life and family

William McKinley, Jr., was born in 1843 in Niles, Ohio, the seventh child of William and Nancy (Allison) McKinley.^[1] The McKinleys were of English and Scots-Irish descent and had settled in western Pennsylvania in the 18th century. There, the elder McKinley was born in Pine Township.^[1] The family moved to Ohio when the senior McKinley was a boy, settling in New Lisbon (now Lisbon). He met Nancy Allison there in 1829, and married her the same year.^[1] The Allison family was of mostly English blood and among Pennsylvania's earliest settlers.^[2] The family trade on both sides was iron-making, and McKinley senior operated foundries in New Lisbon, Niles, Poland, and finally Canton, Ohio.^[3]

The McKinley household was, like many from Ohio's Western Reserve, steeped in Whiggish and abolitionist sentiment.^[4] Religiously, the family was staunchly Methodist and young William followed in that tradition, becoming active in the local Methodist church at the age of sixteen.^[5] He was a lifelong pious Methodist.^[6] In 1852, the family moved from Niles to Poland so that their children could attend the better school there. Graduating in 1859, he enrolled the following year at Allegheny College in Meadville, Pennsylvania. He remained at Allegheny for only one year, returning home in 1860 after becoming ill and depressed.^[7] Although his health recovered, family finances declined and McKinley was unable to return to Allegheny, first working as a postal clerk and later taking a job teaching at a school near Poland.^[8]

Civil War

Western Virginia and Antietam

When the southern states seceded from the Union and the American Civil War began, thousands of men in Ohio volunteered for service.^[9] Among them were McKinley and his cousin, William McKinley Osbourne, who enlisted as privates in the newly formed Poland Guards in June 1861.^[10] The men left for Columbus where they were consolidated with other small units to form the 23rd Ohio Infantry.^[11] The men were unhappy to learn that, unlike Ohio's earlier volunteer regiments, they would not be permitted to elect their officers; they would be designated by Ohio's governor, William Dennison.^[11] Dennison appointed Colonel William Rosecrans as the commander of the regiment, and the men began training on the outskirts of Columbus.^[11] McKinley quickly took to the soldier's life and wrote a series of letters to his hometown newspaper extolling the army and the Union cause.^[12] Delays in issuance of uniforms and weapons again brought the men into conflict with their officers, but Major Rutherford B. Hayes convinced them to accept what the government had issued them; his style in dealing with the men impressed McKinley, beginning an association and friendship that would last until Hayes' death in 1893.^[13]

After a month of training, McKinley and the 23rd Ohio, now led by Colonel Eliakim P. Scammon, set out for western Virginia (today part of West Virginia) in July 1861 as a part of the Kanawha Division.^[14] McKinley initially thought Scammon was a martinet, but when the regiment finally saw battle, he came to appreciate the value of their relentless drilling.^[15] Their first contact with the enemy came in September when they drove back Confederate troops at Carnifex Ferry in present-day West Virginia.^[16] Three days after the battle, McKinley was assigned to duty in the brigade quartermaster office, where he worked both to supply his regiment, and as a clerk.^[17] In November, the regiment established winter quarters near Fayetteville (today in West Virginia).^[18] McKinley spent the winter substituting for a commissary sergeant who was ill, and in April 1862 he was promoted to that rank.^[19] The regiment resumed its advance that spring with Hayes in command (Scammon by then led the brigade) and fought several minor engagements against the rebel forces.^[20]

That September, McKinley's regiment was called east to reinforce General John Pope's Army of Virginia at the Second Battle of Bull Run.^[21] Delayed in passing through Washington, D.C., the 23rd Ohio did not arrive in time for the battle, but joined the Army of the Potomac as it hurried north to cut off Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia as it advanced into Maryland.^[21] The 23rd was the first regiment to encounter the Confederates at the Battle of South Mountain on September 14.^[22] After severe losses, Union forces drove back the Confederates and continued to Sharpsburg, Maryland, where they engaged Lee's army at the Battle of Antietam, one of the bloodiest battles of the war.^[23] The 23rd was also in the thick of the fighting at Antietam, and McKinley himself came under heavy fire when bringing rations to the men on the line.^[23]^[a] McKinley's regiment again suffered many casualties, but the Army of the Potomac was victorious and the Confederates retreated into Virginia.^[23] The regiment was then detached from the Army of the Potomac and returned by train to western Virginia.^[24]

Shenandoah Valley and promotion

While the regiment went into winter quarters near Charleston, Virginia (present-day West Virginia), McKinley was ordered back to Ohio with some other sergeants to recruit fresh troops.^[25] When they arrived in Columbus, Governor David Tod surprised McKinley with a commission as second lieutenant in recognition of his service at Antietam.^[25] McKinley and his comrades saw little action until July 1863, when the division skirmished with John Hunt Morgan's cavalry at the Battle of Buffington Island.^[26] Early in 1864, the Army command structure in West Virginia was reorganized, and the division was assigned to George Crook's Army of West Virginia.^[27] They soon resumed the offensive, marching into southwestern Virginia to destroy salt and lead mines used by the enemy.^[27] On May 9, the army engaged Confederate troops at Cloyd's Mountain, where the men charged the enemy entrenchments and drove the rebels from the field.^[27] McKinley later said the combat there was "as desperate as any witnessed during the war."^[27] Following the rout, the Union forces destroyed Confederate supplies and skirmished with the enemy again successfully.^[27]

McKinley and his regiment moved to the Shenandoah Valley as the armies broke from winter quarters to resume hostilities. Crook's corps was attached to Major General David Hunter's Army of the Shenandoah and soon back in contact with Confederate forces, capturing Lexington, Virginia, on June 11.^[28] They continued south toward Lynchburg, tearing up railroad track as they advanced.^[28] Hunter believed the troops at Lynchburg were too powerful, however, and the brigade returned to West Virginia.^[28] Before the army could make another attempt, Confederate General Jubal Early's raid into Maryland forced their recall to the north.^[29] Early's army surprised them at Kernstown on July 24, where McKinley came under heavy fire and the army was defeated.^[30] Retreating into Maryland, the army was reorganized again: Major General Philip Sheridan replaced Hunter, and McKinley, who had been promoted to captain after the battle, was transferred to General Crook's staff.^[31] By August, Early was retreating south in the valley, with Sheridan's army in pursuit.^[32] They fended off a Confederate assault at Berryville, where McKinley had a horse shot out from under him, and advanced to Opequon Creek, where they broke the enemy lines and pursued them farther south.^[33] They followed up the victory with another at Fisher's Hill on September 22, and were engaged once more at Cedar Creek on October 19.^[34] After initially falling back from the Confederate advance, McKinley helped to rally the troops and turn the tide of the battle.^[34]

After Cedar Creek, the army stayed in the vicinity through election day, when McKinley cast his first presidential ballot, for the incumbent Republican, Abraham Lincoln.^[34] The next day, they moved north up the valley into winter quarters near Kernstown.^[34] In February 1865, Crook was captured by Confederate raiders.^[35] Crook's capture added to the confusion as the army was reorganized for the spring campaign, and McKinley found himself serving on the staffs of four different generals over the next fifteen days—Crook, John D. Stevenson, Samuel S. Carroll, and Winfield S. Hancock.^[35] Finally assigned to Carroll's staff again, McKinley acted as the general's first and only adjutant.^[36] Lee and his army surrendered to General Ulysses S. Grant a few days later, effectively ending the war. McKinley found time to join a Freemason lodge in Winchester, Virginia, before he and Carroll were transferred to Hancock's First Veterans Corps in Washington.^[37] Just before the war's end, McKinley received his final promotion, a brevet commission as major.^[38] In July, the Veterans Corps was mustered out of service, and McKinley and Carroll were relieved of their duties.^[38] Carroll and Hancock encouraged McKinley to apply for a place in the peacetime army, but he declined and returned to Ohio the following month.^[38]

Legal career and marriage

After the war ended in 1865, McKinley decided on a career in the law and began studying in the office of an attorney in Poland, Ohio.^[39] The following year, he continued his studies by attending Albany Law School in New York.^[40] After studying there for a year, McKinley returned home and was admitted to the bar in Warren, Ohio, in March 1867.^[40] That same year, he moved to Canton, the county seat of Stark County, and set up a small office.^[40] He soon formed a partnership with George W. Belden, an experienced lawyer and former judge.^[41] McKinley's practice was successful enough for him to buy a block of buildings on Main Street in Canton, which would provide him with a little consistent rental income for decades to come.^[41] When Hayes was nominated for governor in 1867, McKinley made speeches on his behalf in Stark County, his first foray into politics.^[42] The county was closely divided between Democrats and Republicans but Hayes carried it that year in his statewide victory.^[42] In 1869, McKinley ran for the office of prosecuting attorney of Stark County, an office usually then held by Democrats, and was unexpectedly elected.^[43] When McKinley ran for re-election in 1871, the Democrats nominated William A. Lynch, a prominent local lawyer, and McKinley was defeated by 143 votes.^[43]

As McKinley's professional career progressed, so too did his social life blossom as he wooed Ida Saxton, the daughter of a prominent Canton family.^[43] They were married on January 25, 1871, in the newly built First Presbyterian Church of Canton, although Ida soon joined her husband's Methodist church.^[44] Their first child, Katherine, was born on Christmas Day 1871.^[44] A second daughter, Ida, followed in 1873, but died the same year.^[44] McKinley's wife descended into a deep depression at her baby's death and her health, never robust, grew worse.^[44] Two years later, in 1875, Katherine died of typhoid fever. Ida never recovered from her daughters' deaths; the McKinleys had no more children.^[44] Ida McKinley developed epilepsy around the same time and thereafter disliked her husband leaving her side.^[44] He remained a devoted husband and tended to his wife's medical and emotional needs for the rest of his life.^[44]

Ida insisted that McKinley continue his increasingly successful career in law and politics.^[45] He attended the state Republican convention that nominated Hayes for a third term as governor in 1875, and campaigned again for his old friend in the election that fall.^[45] The next year, McKinley undertook a high-profile case defending a group of coal miners arrested for rioting after a clash with strikebreakers.^[46] Lynch, McKinley's opponent in the 1871 election, and his partner, William R. Day, were the opposing counsel, and the mine owners included Mark Hanna, a Cleveland businessman.^[46] Taking the case pro bono, he was successful in getting all but one of the miners acquitted.^[46] The case raised McKinley's standing among laborers, a crucial part of the Stark County electorate, and also introduced him to Hanna, who would become his strongest backer in years to come.^[46]

McKinley's good standing with labor became useful that year as he campaigned for the Republican nomination for Ohio's 17th congressional district.^[47] Delegates to the county conventions thought he could attract blue-collar voters, and in August 1876, McKinley was nominated.^[47] By that time, Hayes had been nominated for President, and McKinley campaigned for him while running his own congressional campaign.^[48] Both were successful. McKinley, campaigning mostly on his support for a protective tariff, defeated the Democratic nominee, Levi L. Lamborn, by 3,300 votes, while Hayes won a hotly-disputed election to reach the presidency.^[48] McKinley's victory came at a personal cost—his income as a congressman would be half of what he earned as a lawyer.^[49]

Rising politician 1877–1895

Spokesman for protection

McKinley first took his congressional seat in October 1877, when President Hayes summoned Congress into special session.^[b] With the Republicans in the minority, McKinley was given unimportant committee assignments, which he undertook conscientiously.^[50] McKinley's friendship with Hayes did McKinley little good on Capitol Hill; the President was not well-regarded by many leaders there.^[51] The young congressman broke with Hayes on the question of the currency, but it did not affect their friendship.^[52] The United States had effectively been placed on the gold standard by the Coinage Act of 1873; when silver prices dropped significantly, many sought to make silver again a legal tender, equally with gold. Such a course would be inflationary, but advocates argued that the economic benefits of the increased money supply would be worth the inflation; opponents warned that "free silver" would not bring the promised benefits and would harm the United States in international trade.^[53] McKinley voted for the Bland-Allison Act of 1878, which mandated large government purchases of silver for striking into money, and also joined the large majorities in each house that overrode Hayes' veto of the legislation. In so doing, McKinley voted against the position of the House Republican leader, his fellow Ohioan and friend, James Garfield.^[54]

From his first term in Congress, McKinley was a strong advocate of protective tariffs. The primary purposes of such imposts was not to raise revenue, but to allow American manufacturing to develop by giving it a price advantage in the domestic market over foreign competitors. McKinley biographer Margaret Leech noted that Canton had become prosperous as a center for the manufacture of farm equipment because of protection, and that this may have helped form his political views. McKinley introduced and supported bills which raised protective tariffs, and opposed those which lowered them or imposed tariffs simply to raise revenue.^[55] Garfield's election as president in 1880 created a vacancy on the House Ways and Means Committee; McKinley was selected to fill it, placing him on the most powerful committee after only two terms.^[56]

McKinley increasingly became a significant figure in national politics. In 1880, he served a brief term as Ohio's representative on the Republican National Committee. In 1884, he was elected a delegate to that year's Republican convention, where he served as chair of the Committee on Resolutions and won plaudits for his handling of the convention when called upon to preside. By 1886, McKinley, Senator John Sherman, and Governor Joseph B. Foraker were considered the leaders of the Republican party in Ohio.^[57] Sherman, who had helped to found the Republican Party, ran three times for the Republican nomination for president in the 1880s, each time failing,^[58] while Foraker began a meteoric rise in Ohio politics early in the decade. Hanna, once he entered public affairs as a political manager and generous contributor, supported Sherman's ambitions, as well as those of Foraker. The latter relationship broke off at the 1888 Republican National Convention, where McKinley, Foraker, and Hanna were all delegates supporting Sherman. Convinced Sherman could not win, Foraker threw his support to the unsuccessful Republican 1884 presidential nominee, Maine Senator James G. Blaine. When Blaine stated he was not a candidate, Foraker backed the ultimately successful candidate, Indiana Governor Benjamin Harrison, who was elected president. In the bitterness that followed the convention, Hanna abandoned Foraker, and for the rest of McKinley's life, the Ohio Republican Party was divided into two factions, one aligned with McKinley, Sherman, and Hanna and the other with Foraker.^[59] Hanna came to admire McKinley and became a friend and close adviser to him. Although Hanna remained active in business and in promoting other Republicans, in the years after 1888, he spent an increasing amount of time boosting McKinley's political career.^[60]

In 1889, with the Republicans in the majority, McKinley sought election as Speaker of the House. He failed to gain the post, which went to Thomas B. Reed of Maine; however, Speaker Reed appointed McKinley chairman of the Ways and Means Committee. The Ohioan guided the McKinley Tariff of 1890 through Congress; although McKinley's work was altered through the influence of special interests in the Senate, it imposed a number of protective tariffs on foreign goods.^[61]

Gerrymandering and defeat for re-election

Recognizing McKinley's potential, the Democrats, whenever they controlled the Ohio legislature, sought to gerrymander or redistrict him out of office.^[62] In 1878, McKinley faced election in a redrawn 17th district; he won anyway, causing Hayes to exult, "Oh, the good luck of McKinley! He was gerrymandered out and then beat the gerrymander! We enjoyed it as much as he did."^[63] After the 1882 election, McKinley was unseated on an election contest by a near party-line House vote.^[64] Out of office, he was briefly depressed by the setback, but soon vowed to run again. The Democrats again redistricted Stark County for the 1884 election; McKinley was returned to Congress anyway.^[65]

For 1890, the Democrats gerrymandered McKinley one final time, placing Stark County in the same district as one of the strongest pro-Democrat counties, Holmes, populated by solidly Democratic Pennsylvania Dutch. The new boundaries seemed to be good, based on past results, for a Democratic majority of 2000 to 3000. The Republicans could not reverse the gerrymander as legislative elections would not be held until 1891, but they could throw all their energies into the district, as the McKinley Tariff was a main theme of the Democratic campaign nationwide, and there was considerable attention paid to McKinley's race. The Republican Party sent its leading orators to Canton, including Blaine (then Secretary of State), Speaker Reed and President Harrison. The Democrats countered with their best spokesmen on tariff issues.^[66] McKinley tirelessly stumped his new district, reaching out to its 40,000 voters to explain that his tariff

was framed for the people ... as a defense to their industries, as a protection to the labor of their hands, as a safeguard to the happy homes of American workingmen, and as a security to their education, their wages, and their investments ... It will bring to this country a prosperity unparalleled in our own history and unrivalled in the history of the world."^[67]

Democrats ran a strong candidate in former lieutenant governor John G. Warwick. To drive their point home they hired young partisans to pretend to be peddlers, who went door to door offering 25-cent tinware to housewives for 50 cents, explaining the rise in prices was due to the McKinley Tariff. In the end, McKinley lost by 300 votes, but the Republicans won a statewide majority and claimed a moral victory.^[68]

Governor of Ohio

Even before McKinley completed his term in Congress, he met with a delegation of Ohioans urging him to run for governor. Governor James E. Campbell, a Democrat, who had defeated Foraker in 1889, was to seek re-election in 1891. The Ohio Republican party remained divided, but McKinley quietly arranged for Foraker to nominate him at the 1891 state Republican convention, which chose McKinley by acclamation. The former congressman spent much of the second half of 1891 campaigning against Campbell, beginning in his birthplace of Niles. Hanna, however, was little seen in the campaign; he spent much of his time raising funds for the election of legislators pledged to vote for Sherman in the 1892 senatorial election.^[69]^[70]^[c] McKinley won the 1891 election by some 20,000 votes;^[71] the following January, Sherman, with considerable assistance from Hanna, turned back a challenge by Foraker to win the legislature's vote for another term in the Senate.^[72]

Ohio's governor had relatively little power—for example, he could recommend legislation, but not veto it—but with Ohio a key swing state, its governor was a major figure in national politics.^[73] Although McKinley believed that the health of the nation depended on that of business, he was evenhanded in dealing with labor,^[74] procuring legislation to set up an arbitration board at which work disputes could be settled, and obtaining passage of a law to fine employers who fired workers for belonging to a union.^[75]

President Harrison had proven unpopular; there were divisions even within the Republican party as the year 1892 began and Harrison began his re-election drive. Although no declared candidate opposed Harrison, many Republicans were ready to dump the President from the ticket if an alternative emerged. Among the possible candidates spoken of were McKinley, Reed, and the aging Blaine. Fearing that the Ohio governor would emerge as a candidate, Harrison's managers arranged for McKinley to be permanent chairman of the convention in Minneapolis, requiring him to play a public, neutral role. Hanna established an unofficial McKinley headquarters near the convention hall, though no active effort was made to convert delegates to McKinley's cause. McKinley objected to delegate votes being cast for him; nevertheless he finished third, behind the renominated Harrison, and behind Blaine, who had sent word he did not want to be considered.^[76] Although McKinley campaigned loyally for the Republican ticket, Harrison was defeated by former President Cleveland in the November election. In the wake of Cleveland's victory, McKinley was seen by some as the likely Republican candidate in 1896.^[77]

Soon after Cleveland's return to office, hard times struck the nation with the Panic of 1893. A businessman in Youngstown, Robert Walker, had lent money to McKinley in their younger days; in gratitude, McKinley had often guaranteed Walker's borrowings for his business. The governor had never kept track of what he was signing; he believed Walker a sound businessman. In fact, Walker had deceived McKinley, telling him that new notes were actually renewals of matured ones. Walker was ruined by the recession; McKinley was called upon for repayment in February 1893. ^[78] The total owed was over $100,000 and a despairing McKinley initially proposed to resign as governor and earn the money as an attorney.^[79] Instead, McKinley's wealthy supporters, including Hanna and Chicago publisher H. H. Kohlsaat, became trustees of a fund from which the notes would be paid. Both William and Ida McKinley placed their property in the hands of the fund's trustees (who included Hanna and Kohlsaat), and the supporters raised and contributed a substantial sum of money. All of the couple's property was returned to them by the end of 1893, and when McKinley, who had promised eventual repayment, asked for the list of contributors, it was refused him. Many people who had suffered in the hard times sympathized with McKinley, whose popularity grew.^[79] He was easily re-elected in November 1893, receiving the largest percentage of the vote of any Ohio governor since the Civil War.^[80]

McKinley campaigned widely for Republicans in the 1894 midterm congressional elections; many party candidates in districts where he spoke were successful. His political efforts in Ohio were rewarded with the election in November 1895 of a Republican successor as governor, Asa Bushnell, and a Republican legislature that elected Foraker to the Senate. McKinley supported Foraker for Senate and Bushnell (who was of Foraker's faction) for governor; in return, the new senator-elect agreed to back McKinley's presidential ambitions. With party peace in Ohio assured, McKinley turned to the national arena.^[81]

Election of 1896

Obtaining the nomination

It is unclear when William McKinley began to seriously prepare a run for president. As Phillips notes, "no documents, no diaries, no confidential letters to Mark Hanna (or anyone else) contain his secret hopes or veiled stratagems."^[82] From the beginning, McKinley's preparations had the participation of Hanna, whose biographer William T. Horner noted, "what is certainly true is that in 1888 the two men began to develop a close working relationship that helped put McKinley in the White House."^[83] Sherman did not run for president again after 1888, and so Hanna could support McKinley's ambitions for that office wholeheartedly.^[84]

Backed by Hanna's money and organizational skills, McKinley quietly built support for a presidential bid through 1895 and early 1896. When other contenders such as Speaker Reed and Iowa Senator William B. Allison sent agents outside their states to organize Republicans in support of their candidacies, they found that Hanna's agents had preceded them. According to historian Stanley Jones in his study of the 1896 election,

Another feature common to the Reed and Allison campaigns was their failure to make headway against the tide which was running toward McKinley. In fact, both campaigns from the moment they were launched were in retreat. The calm confidence with which each candidate claimed the support of his own section [of the country] soon gave way to ... bitter accusations that Hanna by winning support for McKinley in their sections had violated the rules of the game.^[85]

Hanna, on McKinley's behalf, met with the eastern Republican political bosses, such as Senators Thomas Platt of New York and Matthew Quay of Pennsylvania, who were willing to guarantee McKinley's nomination in exchange for promises regarding patronage and offices. McKinley, however, was determined to obtain the nomination without making deals, and Hanna accepted that decision.^[86] Many of their early efforts were focused on the South—Hanna obtained a vacation home in southern Georgia where McKinley visited and met with Republican politicians from the region. McKinley needed 453½ delegate votes to gain the nomination; he gained nearly half that number from the South and border states. Platt lamented in his memoirs, "[Hanna] had the South practically solid before some of us awakened."^[87]

The bosses still hoped to deny McKinley a first-ballot majority at the convention by boosting support for local favorite son candidates such as Quay, New York Governor (and former vice president) Levi P. Morton, and Illinois Senator Shelby Cullom. Delegate-rich Illinois proved a crucial battleground, as McKinley supporters, such as Chicago businessman (and future vice president) Charles G. Dawes, sought to elect delegates pledged to vote for McKinley at the national convention in St. Louis. Cullom proved unable to stand against McKinley despite the support of local Republican machines; at the state convention at the end of April, McKinley completed a near-sweep of Illinois' delegates.^[88] Former President Harrison had been deemed a possible contender if he entered the race; when Harrison made it known he would not seek a third nomination, the McKinley organization took control of Indiana with a speed Harrison privately found unseemly. Morton operatives who journeyed to Indiana sent word back that they had found the state alive for McKinley.^[89] Wyoming Senator Francis Warren wrote, "The politicians are making a hard fight against him, but if the masses could speak, McKinley is the choice of at least 75% of the entire [body of] Republican voters in the Union".^[90]

By the time the national convention began in St. Louis on June 16, 1896, McKinley had an ample majority of delegates. The former governor, who remained in Canton, followed events at the convention closely by telephone, and was able to hear part of Foraker's speech nominating him over the line. When Ohio was reached in the roll call of states, its votes gave McKinley the nomination, which he celebrated by hugging his wife and mother as his friends fled the house, anticipating the first of many crowds which would gather at the Republican candidate's home. Thousands of partisans came from Canton and surrounding towns that evening to hear McKinley speak from his front porch. The convention nominated Republican National Committee vice chairman Garret Hobart of New Jersey for vice president, a choice actually made, by most accounts, by Hanna. Hobart, a wealthy lawyer, businessman, and former state legislator, was not widely known, but as Hanna biographer Herbert Croly pointed out, "if he did little to strengthen the ticket he did nothing to weaken it".^[91]^[92]

General election campaign

Prior to the Republican convention, McKinley had been a "straddle bug" on the currency question, favoring moderate positions on silver such as accomplishing bimetallism by international agreement. In the final days before the convention, McKinley decided, after hearing from politicians and businessmen, that the platform should endorse the gold standard, though it should allow for bimetallism by international agreement. Adoption of the platform caused some western delegates, led by Colorado Senator Henry M. Teller, to walk out of the convention. However, compared with the Democrats, Republican divisions on the issue were small, especially as McKinley promised future concessions to silver advocates.^[93]^[94]^[95]

The bad economic times had continued, and strengthened the hand of forces for free silver. The issue bitterly divided the Democratic Party; President Cleveland firmly supported the gold standard, but an increasing number of rural Democrats wanted silver, especially in the South and West. The silverites took control of the 1896 Democratic National Convention and chose William Jennings Bryan for president; he had electrified the delegates with his Cross of Gold speech. Bryan's financial radicalism shocked financiers—they thought his inflationary program would bankrupt the railroads and ruin the economy. Hanna approached them for support for his strategy to win the election, and they gave $3.5 million for speakers and over 200 million pamphlets advocating the Republican position on the money and tariff questions.^[96]^[97]

Bryan's campaign had at most $500,000, chiefly from owners of silver mines. With his eloquence and youthful energy were his major assets in the race, Bryan decided on a whistle-stop political tour by train on an unprecedented scale. Hanna urged McKinley to match Bryan's tour with one of his own; the candidate declined on the grounds that the Democrat was a better stump speaker: "I might just as well set up a trapeze on my front lawn and compete with some professional athlete as go out speaking against Bryan. I have to think when I speak."^[98] Instead of going to the people, McKinley would remain at home in Canton and allow the people to come to him; according to historian R. Hal Williams in his book on the 1896 election, "it was, as it turned out, a brilliant strategy. McKinley's 'Front Porch Campaign' became a legend in American political history."^[98]

McKinley made himself available to the public every day except Sunday, receiving delegations from the front porch of his home. The railroads subsidized the visitors with low excursion rates—the pro-silver Cleveland Plain Dealer disgustedly stated that going to Canton had been made "cheaper than staying at home".^[99]^[100] Delegations marched through the streets from the railroad station to McKinley's home on North Market Street. Once there, they crowded close to the front porch—from which they surreptitiously whittled souvenirs—as their spokesman addressed McKinley. The candidate then responded, speaking on campaign issues in a speech molded to suit the interest of the delegation. The speeches were carefully scripted to avoid extemporaneous remarks; even the spokesman's remarks were approved by McKinley or a representative. This was done as the candidate feared an offhand comment by another that might rebound on him.^[99]^[101]^[102]

Most Democratic newspapers refused to support Bryan, the major exception being the New York Journal, controlled by William Randolph Hearst, whose fortune was based on silver mines. In biased reporting and through the sharp cartoons of Homer Davenport, Hanna was viciously characterized as a plutocrat, trampling on labor. McKinley was drawn as a child, easily controlled by big business.^[103] Even today, these depictions still color the images of Hanna and McKinley: one as a heartless businessman, the other as a creature of Hanna and others of his ilk.^[104]

McKinley speaks from the front porch

Historic recording of William McKinley. The final 1:08 of this sound file contains an excerpt from one of his 1896 campaign speeches.

Problems playing this file? See media help.

The Democrats had pamphlets too, though not as many. Jones analyzed how voters responded to the education campaigns of the two parties:

For the people it was a campaign of study and analysis, of exhortation and conviction—a campaign of search for economic and political truth. Pamphlets tumbled from the presses, to be read, reread, studied, debated, to become guides to economic thought and political action. They were printed and distributed by the million ... but the people hankered for more. Favorite pamphlets became dog-eared, grimy, fell apart as their owners laboriously restudied their arguments and quoted from them in public and private debate.^[105]

The battleground proved to be the Midwest—the South and most of the West were conceded to Bryan—and the Democrat spent much of his time in those crucial states.^[106]^[107] The Northeast was considered most likely safe for McKinley after the early-voting states of Maine and Vermont supported him in September.^[108] By then, it was clear that public support for silver had receded, and McKinley began to emphasize the tariff issue. By the end of September, the Republicans had discontinued printing material on the silver issue, and were entirely concentrating on the tariff question.^[109] On November 3, 1896, the voters had their say in most of the nation. McKinley won the entire Northeast and Midwest; he won 51% of the vote and an ample majority in the Electoral College. Bryan had concentrated entirely on the silver issue, and had not appealed to urban workers. Voters in cities supported McKinley; the only city of more than 100,000 population carried by Bryan was Denver, Colorado.^[110]

The 1896 presidential election is often seen as a realigning election, in which McKinley's view of a stronger central government building American industry through protective tariffs and a dollar based on gold triumphed. The voting patterns established then displaced the near-deadlock the major parties had seen since the Civil War; the Republican dominance begun then would continue until 1932, another realigning election with the ascent of Franklin Roosevelt.^[111] Phillips argues that, with the possible exception of Iowa Senator Allison, McKinley was the only Republican who could have defeated Bryan—he theorized that eastern candidates such as Morton or Reed would have done badly against the Illinois-born Bryan in the crucial Midwest.^[112] According to the biographer, though Bryan was popular among rural voters, "McKinley appealed to a very different industrialized, urbanized America."^[113]

Presidency 1897–1901

Inauguration and appointments

William McKinley was sworn in as president on March 4, 1897, as his wife and mother looked on. The new President gave a lengthy inaugural address; he urged tariff reform, and stated that the currency issue would have to await tariff legislation. He warned against foreign interventions, "We want no wars of conquest. We must avoid the temptation of territorial aggression."^[114]

McKinley's most controversial Cabinet appointment was that of John Sherman as Secretary of State.^[115] Sherman was not McKinley's first choice for the position; he initially offered it to Senator Allison.^[115] One consideration in Senator Sherman's appointment was to provide a place in the Senate for Hanna (who had turned down a Cabinet position as Postmaster General). As Sherman had served as Secretary of the Treasury under Hayes, only the State position, the leading Cabinet post, was likely to entice him from the Senate. Sherman's mental faculties were decaying even in 1896; this was widely spoken of in political circles, but McKinley did not believe the rumors.^[115] Nevertheless, McKinley sent his cousin, William McKinley Osborne, to have dinner with the 73-year-old senator; he reported back that Sherman seemed as lucid as ever.^[116] McKinley wrote once the appointment was announced, "the stories regarding Senator Sherman's 'mental decay' are without foundation ... When I saw him last I was convinced both of his perfect health, physically and mentally, and that the prospects of life were remarkably good."^[116]

After some difficulties, Ohio Governor Bushnell appointed Hanna to the Senate.^[117] Once in Cabinet office, Sherman's mental incapacity became increasingly apparent. He was often bypassed by his first assistant, McKinley's Canton crony Judge William Day, and by the somewhat-deaf second secretary, Alvey A. Adee. Day, an Ohio lawyer unfamiliar with diplomacy, was often reticent in meetings. One diplomat characterized the arrangement, "the head of the department knew nothing, the first assistant said nothing, and the second assistant heard nothing".^[116]

Maine Congressman Nelson Dingley, Jr., was McKinley's choice for Secretary of the Treasury; he declined it, preferring to remain as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee. Charles Dawes, who had been Hanna's lieutenant in Chicago during the campaign, was considered for the Treasury post but by some accounts Dawes considered himself too young. Dawes eventually became Comptroller of the Currency; he recorded in his published diary that he had strongly urged McKinley to appoint as secretary the successful candidate Lyman J. Gage, president of the First National Bank of Chicago.^[118] The Navy Department was offered to former Massachusetts Congressman John Davis Long, an old friend from the House, on January 30, 1897.^[119] Although McKinley was initially inclined to allow Long to choose his own assistant, there was considerable pressure on the President-elect to appoint Theodore Roosevelt, head of the New York City Police Commission and a former state assemblyman. McKinley was reluctant, stating to one Roosevelt booster, "I want peace and I am told that your friend Theodore is always getting into rows with everybody." Nevertheless, he made the appointment.^[120]

Video clip of McKinley's inauguration in 1897

In addition to Sherman, McKinley made one other Cabinet appointment which proved ill-advised,^[121] that of Secretary of War, which fell to Russell A. Alger, former general and Michigan governor. Competent enough in peacetime, Alger proved inadequate once the conflict with Spain began. With the War Department plagued by scandal, Alger resigned at McKinley's request in mid-1899.^[122] Vice President Hobart, as was customary at the time, was not invited to Cabinet meetings. However, he proved a valuable adviser both for McKinley and for his Cabinet members. The wealthy Vice President leased a residence close to the White House; the two families visited each other without formality, and the Vice President's wife, Jennie Tuttle Hobart, sometimes substituted as Executive Mansion hostess when Ida McKinley was not well.^[123] For most of McKinley's administration, George B. Cortelyou served as his personal secretary. Cortelyou, who served in three Cabinet positions under Theodore Roosevelt, became a combination press secretary and chief of staff to McKinley.^[124]

War with Spain

For decades, rebels in Cuba had waged an intermittent campaign for freedom from Spanish colonial rule. By 1895, the conflict had expanded to a war for Cuban independence.^[125] As war engulfed the island, Spanish reprisals against the rebels grew ever harsher. These included the removal of Cubans to reconcentration camps near Spanish military bases, a strategy designed to make it hard for the rebels to receive support in the countryside.^[126] American opinion favored the rebels, and McKinley shared in their outrage against Spanish policies.^[127] As many of his countrymen called for war to liberate Cuba, McKinley favored a peaceful approach, hoping that through negotiation Spain might be convinced to grant Cuba independence, or at least to allow the Cubans some measure of autonomy.^[128] The United States and Spain began negotiations on the subject in 1897, but it became clear that Spain would never concede Cuban independence, while the rebels (and their American supporters) would never settle for anything less.^[129] In January 1898, Spain promised some concessions to the rebels, but when American consul Fitzhugh Lee reported riots in Havana, McKinley agreed to send the battleship USS Maine there to protect American lives and property.^[130] On February 15, the Maine exploded and sunk with 266 men killed.^[131] Public opinion and the newspapers demanded war, but McKinley insisted that a court of inquiry first determine if the explosion was accidental.^[132] Negotiations with Spain continued as the court considered the evidence, but on March 20, the court ruled that the Maine was blown up by an underwater mine.^[133] As pressure for war mounted in Congress, McKinley continued to negotiate for Cuban independence.^[134] Spain refused McKinley's proposals, and on April 11, McKinley turned the matter over to Congress. He did not ask for war, but Congress anyway declared war on April 20, with the addition of the Teller Amendment which disavowed any intention of annexing Cuba.^[135]

Editorial cartoon intervention in Cuba. Columbia (the American people) reaches out to help oppressed Cuba in 1897 while Uncle Sam (the U.S. government) is blind to the crisis and will not use its powerful guns to help. *Judge* magazine, Feb. 6, 1897

The expansion of the telegraph and the development of the telephone gave McKinley a greater control over the day-to-day management of the war than previous presidents had enjoyed, and he used the new technologies to direct the army's and navy's movements as far as he was able.^[136] McKinley found Alger inadequate as Secretary of War, and did not get along with the Army's commanding general, Nelson A. Miles.^[137] Bypassing them, he looked for strategic advice first from Miles's predecessor, General John Schofield, and later from Adjutant General Henry Clarke Corbin.^[137] The war also led to a change in McKinley's cabinet, as the President accepted Sherman's resignation as Secretary of State; Day agreed to serve as Secretary until the war's end.^[138]

Within a fortnight, the navy had its first victory when the Asiatic Squadron, led by Commodore George Dewey, engaged the Spanish navy at the Battle of Manila Bay in the Philippines, destroying the enemy force without the loss of a single American vessel.^[139] Dewey's overwhelming victory expanded the scope of the war from one centered in the Caribbean to one that would determine the fate of all of Spain's Pacific colonies.^[140] The next month, McKinley increased the number of troops to be sent to the Philippines and granted the force's commander, Major General Wesley Merritt, the power to set up legal systems and raise taxes—necessities for a long occupation.^[141] By the time the troops arrived in the Philippines at the end of June 1898, McKinley had decided that Spain would be required to surrender the archipelago to the United States.^[142] He professed to be open to all views on the subject, however, he believed that as the war progressed, the public would come to demand retention of the islands as a prize of war.^[143]

Meanwhile, in the Caribbean theater, a large force of regulars and volunteers gathered near Tampa, Florida, for an invasion of Cuba.^[144] The army faced difficulties in supplying the rapidly expanding force even before they departed for Cuba, but by June, Corbin had made progress in resolving the problems.^[145] After lengthy delays, the army, led by Major General William Rufus Shafter, sailed from Florida on June 20, landing near Santiago de Cuba two days later.^[146] Following a skirmish at Las Guasimas on June 24, Shafter's army engaged the Spanish forces on July 2 in the Battle of San Juan Hill.^[147] In an intense day-long battle, the American force was victorious, although both sides suffered heavy causalities.^[148] The next day, the Spanish Caribbean squadron, which had been sheltering in Santiago's harbor, broke for the open sea but was intercepted and destroyed by Rear Admiral William T. Sampson's North Atlantic Squadron in the largest naval battle of the war.^[149] Shafter laid siege to the city of Santiago, which surrendered on July 17, placing Cuba in effective American control.^[150] McKinley and Miles also ordered an invasion of Puerto Rico, which met little resistance when it landed in July.^[150] The distance from Spain and the destruction of the Spanish navy made resupply impossible, and the Spanish government began to look for a way to end the war.^[151]

Peace and territorial gain

On July 22, the Spanish authorized Jules Cambon, the French Ambassador to the United States, to represent Spain in negotiating peace.^[151] The Spanish initially wished to restrict the discussion to Cuba, but were quickly forced to recognize that their other possessions were to be claimed as spoils of war.^[151] McKinley's cabinet agreed with him that Spain must leave Cuba and Puerto Rico, but they disagreed on the Philippines, with some wishing to annex the entire archipelago and some wishing only to retain a naval base in the area.^[152] Although public sentiment seemed to favor annexation of the Philippines, several prominent political leaders, including Bryan, ex-President Cleveland, and the newly formed American Anti-Imperialist League made their opposition known.^[153] McKinley proposed to open negotiations with Spain on the basis of Cuban liberation and Puerto Rican annexation, with the final status of the Philippines to be subject to further discussion.^[154] He stood firmly in that demand even as the military situation on Cuba began to deteriorate when the American army was struck with yellow fever.^[154] Spain ultimately agreed to a ceasefire on those terms on August 12, and treaty negotiations began in Paris in September 1898.^[155] The talks continued until December 18, when the Treaty of Paris was signed.^[156] The United States acquired Puerto Rico and the Philippines as well as the island of Guam, and Spain relinquished its claims to Cuba; in exchange, the United States agreed to pay Spain $20 million.^[156] McKinley had difficulty convincing the Senate to approve the treaty by the requisite two-thirds vote, but his lobbying, and that of Vice President Hobart, eventually saw success, as the Senate voted in favor on February 6, 1899, 57 to 27.^[157]

During the war, McKinley also pursued the annexation of the Republic of Hawaii. The new republic, dominated by American interests, had seized power from the royal government in 1893.^[158] The lame-duck Harrison administration had submitted a treaty of annexation to the Senate; Cleveland, once he returned to office, had sent a special commission to the islands. After receiving the report, Cleveland withdrew the treaty, stating that the revolution did not reflect the will of Hawaiian citizens.^[159] Nevertheless, many Americans favored annexation, and the cause gained momentum as the United States became embroiled in war with Spain.^[160] McKinley came to office as a supporter of annexation, and lobbied Congress to adopt his opinion, believing that to do nothing would invite a royalist counter-revolution or a Japanese takeover.^[160] Foreseeing difficulty in getting two-thirds of the Senate to approve a treaty of annexation, McKinley instead supported the effort of Democratic Representative Francis G. Newlands of Nevada to accomplish the result by joint resolution of both houses of Congress.^[161] The resulting Newlands Resolution passed both houses by wide margins, and McKinley signed it into law on July 8, 1898.^[161] McKinley biographer H. Wayne Morgan notes, "McKinley was the guiding spirit behind the annexation of Hawaii, showing ... a firmness in pursuing it";^[162] the President told Cortelyou, "We need Hawaii just as much and a good deal more than we did California. It is manifest destiny."^[163] Wake Island, an uninhabited atoll between Hawaii and Guam, was claimed for the United States on July 12, 1898.^[164]

Expanding influence overseas

In acquiring of Pacific possessions for the United States, McKinley expanded the nation's ability to compete for trade in China.^[165] Even before peace negotiations began with Spain, McKinley asked Congress to set up a commission to examine trade opportunities in the region and espoused an "Open Door Policy", in which all nations would freely trade with China and none would seek to violate that nation's territorial integrity.^[166] When John Hay replaced Day as Secretary of State at the end of the war, he circulated notes to that effect to the European powers.^[167] Great Britain favored the idea, but Russia opposed it; France, Germany, Italy and Japan agreed in principle, but only if all the other nations signed on.^[167]

Trade with China became imperiled shortly thereafter as the Boxer Rebellion menaced foreigners and their property in China.^[168] Americans and other westerners in Peking were besieged and, in cooperation with other western powers, McKinley ordered 5000 troops to the city in June 1900 in the China Relief Expedition.^[169] The westerners were liberated the next month, but several Congressional Democrats objected to McKinley dispatching troops without consulting the legislature.^[168] McKinley's actions set a precedent that led to most of his successors exerting similar independent control over the military.^[169] After the rebellion ended, the United States reaffirmed its commitment to the Open Door policy, which became the basis of American policy toward China.^[170]

Closer to home, McKinley and Hay engaged in negotiations with Britain over the possible construction of a canal across Central America. The Clayton–Bulwer Treaty, which the two nations signed in 1850, prohibited either from establishing exclusive control over a canal there. The war had exposed the difficulty of maintaining a two-ocean navy without a connection closer than Cape Horn.^[171] Now, with American business and military interests even more involved in Asia, a canal seemed more essential than ever, and McKinley pressed for a renegotiation of the treaty.^[171] Hay and the British ambassador, Julian Pauncefote, agreed that the United States could control a future canal, provided that it was open to all shipping and not fortified.^[172] McKinley was satisfied with the terms, but the Senate rejected them, demanding that the United States be allowed to fortify the canal.^[172] Hay was embarrassed by the rebuff and offered his resignation, but McKinley refused it and ordered him to continue negotiations to achieve the Senate's demands.^[172] He was successful, and a new treaty was drafted and approved, but not before McKinley's assassination in 1901.^[172]

Tariffs and bimetallism

Two of the great issues of the day, tariff reform and free silver, became intertwined in 1897.^[173] Ways and Means chairman Dingley introduced a new tariff bill (later called the Dingley Act) to revise the Wilson–Gorman Tariff Act of 1894.^[173] McKinley supported the bill, which increased tariffs on wool, sugar, and luxury goods, but the proposed new rates alarmed the French, who exported many luxury items to the United States.^[173] The Dingley Act passed the House easily, but was delayed in the Senate as they assessed the French objections.^[174] French representatives offered to cooperate with the United States in developing an international agreement on bimetallism if the new tariff rates were reduced; this pleased silverite Republicans in the Senate, whose votes were necessary for passage.^[175] The Senate amended the bill to allow limited reciprocity (giving France some possibility of relief), but did not reduce the rates on luxury goods.^[176] McKinley signed the bill into law and agreed to begin negotiations on an international bimetallism standard.^[177]

American negotiators soon concluded a reciprocity treaty with France, and the two nations approached Britain to gauge British enthusiasm for bimetallism.^[177] The Prime Minister, Lord Salisbury, and his government showed some interest in the idea and told the American envoy, Edward O. Wolcott, that he would be amenable to reopening the mints in India to silver coinage if the British-dominated government there agreed.^[178] News of a possible departure from the gold standard stirred up immediate opposition from its partisans, and misgivings by the Indian administration led Britain to reject the proposal.^[178] With the international effort a failure, McKinley turned away from silver coinage and embraced the gold standard.^[179] Even without the agreement, agitation for free silver eased as prosperity began to return to the United States and gold from recent strikes in the Yukon and Australia increased the monetary supply even without silver coinage.^[180] In the absence of international agreement, McKinley favored legislation to formally affirm the gold standard, but was initially deterred by the silver strength in the Senate.^[181] By 1900, with another campaign ahead and good economic conditions, McKinley urged Congress to pass such a law, and was able to sign the Gold Standard Act on March 14, 1900, using a gold pen to do so.^[182]

Judicial appointments

After the retirement of Justice Stephen Johnson Field, McKinley appointed Attorney General Joseph McKenna to the Supreme Court of the United States in December 1897.^[183] The appointment aroused some controversy as McKenna's critics in the Senate said he was too closely associated with railroad interests and lacked the qualifications of a Supreme Court justice.^[184] Despite the objections, McKenna's nomination was approved unanimously.^[185] McKenna responded to the criticism of his legal education by taking some courses at Columbia Law School for several months before taking his seat.^[184]

Along with his Supreme Court appointment, McKinley appointed six judges to the United States Courts of Appeals, and 28 judges to the United States district courts.^[186]

Civil rights

In the wake of McKinley's election in 1896, African Americans were hopeful of progress towards equality. McKinley had spoken out against lynching while governor, and most African Americans who could vote supported him in 1896. McKinley's priority, however, was in ending sectionalism, and they were disappointed by his policies and appointments. Although McKinley made some appointments of African Americans to low-level government posts, and received some praise for that, the appointments were less than they had received under previous Republican administrations. Blanche K. Bruce, an African American who during Reconstruction had served as senator from Mississippi, received the post of register at the Treasury Department; this post was traditionally given to an African American by Republican presidents. McKinley appointed several black postmasters, however, when whites protested the appointment of Justin W. Lyons as postmaster of Augusta, Georgia, McKinley asked Lyons to withdraw; he was given the post of Treasury register after Bruce's death in 1898.^[187] The President did appoint George B. Jackson, a former slave, to the post of customs collector in Presidio, Texas.^[188] However, African Americans in northern states felt their contributions to McKinley's victory were overlooked; few were appointed to office.^[187]

The administration's response to racial violence was minimal; causing him to lose black support.^[187] When black postmasters at Hogansville, Georgia in 1897 and at Lake City, South Carolina the following year were assaulted, McKinley issued no statement of condemnation. Although black leaders criticized McKinley for inaction, supporters responded there was little the president could do to intervene. Critics replied that he could at least publicly condemn such events, as Harrison had done.^[189]

According to historian Clarance A. Bacote, "Before the Spanish-American War, the Negroes, in spite of some mistakes, regarded McKinley as the best friend they ever had."^[190] African Americans saw the onset of war in 1898 as an opportunity to display their patriotism; and black soldiers fought bravely at El Caney and San Juan Hill. African Americans in the peacetime Army had formed elite units; nevertheless they were harassed by whites as they traveled from the West to Tampa for embarkation to the war. Under pressure from black leaders, McKinley required the War Department to commission black officers above the rank of lieutenant. The heroism of the black troops did not still racial tensions in the South, as the second half of 1898 saw several outbreaks of racial violence; 11 African Americans were killed in riots in Wilmington, North Carolina.^[191] McKinley toured the South in late 1898, hoping for sectional reconciliation. In addition to visiting Tuskegee Institute and black educator Booker T. Washington, he addressed the Georgia legislature, wearing a badge of gray, and visited Confederate memorials. In his tour of the South, McKinley did not mention the racial tensions or violence. Although the President received a rapturous reception from Southern whites, many African Americans, excluded from official welcoming committees, felt alienated by the President's words and actions.^[191]^[192]

According to Gould and later biographer Phillips, given the political climate in the South, with white legislatures passing segregationist laws such as that upheld in Plessy v. Ferguson, there was little McKinley could have done to improve race relations, and he did better than later presidents Theodore Roosevelt, who doubted racial equality, and Woodrow Wilson, who supported segregation. However, Gould concluded, "McKinley lacked the vision to transcend the biases of his day and to point toward a better future for all Americans".^[193]

1900 election

Republicans were generally successful in state and local elections around the country in 1899, and McKinley was optimistic about his chances at re-election in 1900.^[194] McKinley's popularity in his first term assured him of renomination for a second.^[195] The only question about the Republican ticket concerned the vice presidential nomination; McKinley needed a new running mate as Hobart had died in late 1899.^[196] McKinley initially favored Elihu Root, who had succeeded Alger as Secretary of War, but McKinley decided that Root was doing too good a job at the War Department to move him.^[196] He considered other prominent candidates, including Allison and Cornelius N. Bliss, but none were as popular as the Republican party's rising star, Theodore Roosevelt.^[197] After a stint as Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Roosevelt had resigned and raised a cavalry regiment; they fought bravely in Cuba, and Roosevelt returned home covered in glory. Elected governor of New York on a reform platform in 1898, Roosevelt had his eye on the presidency.^[196] Many supporters recommended him to McKinley for the second spot on the ticket, and Roosevelt believed it would be an excellent stepping stone to the presidency in 1904.^[196] McKinley remained uncommitted in public, but Hanna was firmly opposed to the New York governor.^[198] The Ohio senator considered the New Yorker overly impulsive; his stance was undermined by the efforts of political boss and New York Senator Thomas Platt, who, disliking Roosevelt's reform agenda, sought to sideline the governor by making him vice president.^[199]

When the Republican convention began in Philadelphia that June, no vice presidential candidate had overwhelming support, but Roosevelt had the broadest range of support from around the country.^[196] McKinley affirmed that the choice belonged to the convention, not to him.^[200] On June 21, McKinley was unanimously renominated and, with Hanna's reluctant acquiescence, Roosevelt was nominated for vice president on the first ballot.^[201] The Democratic convention convened the next month in Kansas City and nominated William Jennings Bryan, setting up a rematch of the 1896 contest.^[202] The candidates were the same, but the issues of the campaign had shifted: free silver was still a question that animated many voters, but the Republicans focused on victory in war and prosperity at home as issues they believed favored their party.^[203] Democrats knew the war had been popular, even if the imperialism issue was less sure, so they focused on the issue of trusts and corporate power, painting McKinley as the servant of capital and big business.^[204] As in 1896, Bryan embarked on a speaking tour around the country while McKinley stayed at home, this time making only one speech, to accept his nomination.^[205] Roosevelt emerged as the campaign's primary speaker and Hanna helped the cause working to settle a coal miners strike in Pennsylvania.^[206] Bryan's campaigning failed to excite the voters as it had in 1896, and McKinley never doubted that he would be re-elected.^[207] On November 6, 1900, he was proven correct, winning the largest victory for any Republican since 1872.^[208] Bryan carried only four states outside the solid South, and McKinley even won Bryan's home state of Nebraska.^[208]

Second term and assassination

Artist's conception of the shooting of McKinley

Soon after his second inauguration on March 4, 1901, William and Ida McKinley undertook a six-week tour of the nation. Traveling mostly by rail, the McKinleys were to travel through the South to the Southwest, and then up the Pacific coast and east again, to conclude with a visit on June 13, 1901 to the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, New York.^[209] However, the First Lady fell ill in California; causing her husband to limit his public events and cancel a series of speeches he had planned to give urging trade reciprocity. He also postponed the visit to the fair until September, planning a month in Washington and two in Canton before the Buffalo visit.^[210]

Although McKinley enjoyed meeting the public, Cortelyou was concerned with his security due to recent assassinations by anarchists in Europe, and twice tried to remove a public reception from the President's rescheduled visit to the Exposition. McKinley refused, and Cortelyou arranged for additional security for the trip.^[211] On September 5, the President delivered his address at the fairgrounds, before a crowd of some 50,000 people. In his final speech, McKinley urged reciprocity treaties with other nations to assure American manufacturers foreign markets. He intended the speech as a keynote to his plans for a second term.^[212]^[213]

One man in the crowd, anarchist Leon Czolgosz, hoped to assassinate McKinley. He had managed to get close to the presidential podium, but did not fire, uncertain of hitting his target.^[212] Czolgosz, since hearing a speech by fellow anarchist Emma Goldman in Cleveland, had decided to do something heroic (in his own mind) for the cause. He had initially decided to get near McKinley, and on September 4, he decided to assassinate him.^[214] After the failure on the 5th, Czolgosz waited the next day at the Temple of Music on the Exposition grounds, where the President was to meet the public after his return from the falls. The anarchist concealed his gun in a handkerchief, and when he reached the head of the line, shot McKinley twice in the abdomen.^[215]

McKinley's concerns, after unsuccessfully trying to convince Cortelyou that he was not seriously wounded, were to urge his aides to break the news gently to Ida, and to call off the mob which had set on Czolgosz—a request that may have saved his assassin's life.^[216] McKinley was taken by electric ambulance to the Exposition hospital, which despite its name and the inclusion of an operating theatre generally only dealt with the minor medical issues of fairgoers. One bullet had apparently been deflected by a button and only grazed the President. Cortelyou selected Dr. Matthew D. Mann from the doctors who hastened to the scene; he had little experience in abdominal surgery or in dealing with gunshot wounds and proved unable to locate the other bullet. Although a primitive X-ray machine was being exhibited on the Exposition grounds, it was not used, and Mann carefully cleaned and closed the wound. After the operation, McKinley was taken to the Milburn House, where the First Lady had taken the news calmly.^[217]

In the days after the shooting McKinley appeared to improve. Doctors issued increasingly cheerful bulletins. Members of the Cabinet, who had rushed to Buffalo on hearing the news dispersed; Vice President Roosevelt departed on a camping trip to the Adirondacks.^[218] Leech wrote,

It is difficult to interpret the optimism with which the President's physicians looked for his recovery. There was obviously the most serious danger that his wounds would become septic. In that case, he would almost certainly die, since drugs to control infection did not exist ... [Prominent New York City physician] Dr. McBurney was by far the worst offender in showering sanguine assurances on the correspondents. As the only big-city surgeon on the case, he was eagerly questioned and quoted, and his rosy prognostications largely contributed to the delusion of the American public.^[219]

By September 12, McKinley's doctors were confident enough of his condition to allow him toast and coffee. He proved unable to digest the food; unknown to the doctors, the gangrene which would kill him was growing on the walls of his stomach, slowly poisoning his blood. On the morning of September 13, McKinley took a turn for the worse and became critically ill. Frantic word was sent to the Vice President, who was 12 miles (19 km) from the nearest telegraph station or telephone. By the evening, McKinley roused from a stupor and realized his condition: "It is useless, gentlemen. I think we ought to have prayer."^[220] Relatives and friends gathered around the dying man's bed as Ida McKinley sobbed over him, stating that she wanted to go with him. "We are all going, we are all going," her husband replied. "God's will be done, not ours."^[220] By some accounts, those were his final words; he may also have sung part of his favorite hymn, "Nearer, My God, to Thee". Sometime that evening, Mark Hanna approached the bedside. The senator addressed McKinley as "Mr. President"; when he received no intelligible response, he abandoned formality and cried out to his friend, "William, William, don't you know me?"^[220]

At 2:15 a.m. on September 14, 1901, President McKinley died.^[220] Theodore Roosevelt was hastily returning to Buffalo by horseback and rail; that afternoon he took the oath of office as president in Buffalo at the house of his friend Ansley Wilcox, wearing borrowed formal clothing and pledging to carry out McKinley's political agenda.^[221] Czolgosz, put on trial for murder nine days after McKinley's death, was found guilty, sentenced to death on September 26, and was executed by electric chair on October 29, 1901.^[222]

Funeral, memorials, and legacy

Funeral and resting place

According to Gould, "The nation experienced a wave of genuine grief at the news of McKinley's passing."^[223] The stock market, faced with sudden uncertainty, suffered a steep decline; this was almost unnoticed in the mourning. The nation's attention was focused on the casket which made its way by train first to Washington, where it first lay in the East Room of the Executive Mansion and then in state in the Capitol, and then to Canton.^[224] A hundred thousand people passed by the open casket in the Capitol Rotunda, many having waited hours in the rain; in Canton, an equal number did the same at the Stark County Courthouse on September 18. The following day, a funeral service was held at the First Methodist Church; the casket was then sealed and taken to the McKinley house, where relatives paid their final respects.^[225] It was then transported to the receiving vault at West Lawn Cemetery in Canton, to await the construction of the memorial to McKinley already being planned.^[226]

There was a widespread expectation that Ida McKinley would not long survive her husband; one family friend stated, as William McKinley lay dying, that they should be prepared for a double funeral.^[227] This did not occur; the former first lady accompanied her husband on the funeral train. Leech noted "the circuitous journey was a cruel ordeal for the woman who huddled in a compartment of the funeral train, praying that the Lord would take her with her Dearest Love".^[228] She was not able to attend the services in Washington or Canton, though she listened at the door to the service for her husband in her house on North Market Street. She remained in Canton for the remainder of her life, setting up a shrine in her house, and often visiting the receiving vault, until her death at age 59 on May 26, 1907.^[227] She died only months before the completion of the large marble monument to her husband in Canton, which was dedicated by President Roosevelt on September 30, 1907. William and Ida McKinley rest there with their daughters, atop a hillside overlooking the city of Canton.^[229]

Other memorials

In addition to the Canton site, for which over a million school children donated money, there are many memorials to William McKinley. There is a monument at his birthplace in Niles; 20 Ohio schools bear his name.^[230] Nearly a million dollars was pledged by contributors or allocated from public funds for the construction of McKinley memorials in the year after his death.^[231] Phillips suggests the significant number of major memorials to McKinley in Ohio reflected the expectation among Ohioans in the years after McKinley's death that he would be ranked among the great presidents.^[232] Statues to him may be found in more than a dozen states; his name has been bestowed on streets, civic organizations, and libraries. Mount McKinley in central Alaska is named for the former president; its summit, at 20,320 feet (6,190 m), is the highest point in North America. Until its name was changed to Denali National Park, the park which surrounds it was known as Mount McKinley National Park.^[230]

Legacy and historical image

McKinley's biographer, H. Wayne Morgan remarks that McKinley died the most beloved president in history.^[233] However, the young, enthusiastic Roosevelt quickly captured public attention after his predecessor's death. The new president made little effort to secure the trade reciprocity McKinley had intended to negotiate with other nations. Controversy and public interest surrounded Roosevelt throughout the seven and a half years of his presidency as memories of McKinley faded; by 1920, according to Gould, McKinley's administration was deemed no more than "a mediocre prelude to the vigor and energy of Theodore Roosevelt's".^[223] Beginning in the 1950s, McKinley received more favorable evaluations; nevertheless, in surveys ranking American presidents, he has generally been placed near the middle, often trailing contemporaries such as Hayes and Cleveland.^[223] Morgan suggests that this relatively low ranking is due to a perception among historians that while many decisions during McKinley's presidency profoundly affected the nation's future, he more followed public opinion than led it, and that McKinley's standing has suffered from altered public expectations of the presidency.^[234]

There has been broad agreement among historians that McKinley's election was at the time of a transition between two political eras, dubbed the Third and Fourth Party Systems.^[235] Historian Daniel P. Klinghard argued that McKinley's personal control of the 1896 campaign gave him the opportunity to reshape the presidency—rather than simply follow the party platform—by representing himself as the voice of the people.^[236] However, more recently, as Republican political official Karl Rove exalted McKinley as the agent of sweeping political realignment in the 2000s, some scholars, such as David Mayhew, questioned whether the 1896 election truly represented a realignment, thereby placing in issue whether McKinley deserves credit for it.^[237] Historian Michael J. Korzi argued in 2005 that while it is tempting to see McKinley as the key figure in the transition from congressional domination of government to the modern, powerful president, this change was an incremental process through the late 19th and early 20th centuries.^[238]

Phillips writes that McKinley's low rating is undeserved, and that he should be ranked just after the great presidents such as Washington and Lincoln. He pointed to McKinley's success in building an electoral coalition which would keep the Republicans mostly in power for a generation.^[239] Phillips believes a McKinley legacy to be the men whom he made a part of his administration, and who dominated the Republican Party for a quarter century after his death. These officials included Cortelyou, who served in three Cabinet positions under Roosevelt and Dawes, who became vice president under Coolidge. Others appointed by McKinley who would become major figures in later years were Day, who was elevated to the Supreme Court by Roosevelt and remained there almost twenty years, and William Howard Taft, whom McKinley had made Governor-General of the Philippines and who succeeded Roosevelt as president.^[240]

A controversial aspect of McKinley's presidency is territorial expansion and the question of imperialism—with the exception of the Philippines, granted independence in 1946, the United States retains the territories taken under McKinley.^[241] The territorial expansion of 1898 is often seen by historians as the beginning of American empire;^[242] Morgan sees that historical discussion as a subset of the debate over the rise of America as a world power; he expects the debate over McKinley's actions to continue indefinitely without resolution, and notes that however one judges McKinley's actions in American expansion, one of his motivations was to change the lives of Filipinos and Cubans for the better.^[243]

Morgan alludes to the rise of interest in McKinley as part of the debate over the more assertive American foreign policy of recent decades:

McKinley was a major actor in some of the most important events in American history. His decisions shaped future policies and public attitudes. He usually rises in the estimation of scholars who study his life in detail. Even those who disagree with his policies and decisions see him as an active, responsible, informed participant in charge of decision making. His dignified demeanor and subtle operations keep him somewhat remote from public perception. But he is once again at the center of events, where he started.^[244]

Notes

^ In 1896, some of McKinley's comrades lobbied for him to be belatedly awarded the Medal of Honor for his bravery that day; Lieutenant General Nelson A. Miles was inclined to grant McKinley the award, but when the then-President-elect heard about the effort, he declined it. See Armstrong, pp. 38–41; Phillips, p. 21.
^ Until the ratification of the 20th Amendment in 1933, the Constitution prescribed that Congress begin its regular sessions in early December. See US Senate, Sessions of Congress.
^ Before the passage of the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1913, Senators were elected by state legislatures.

References

^ ^a ^b ^c Leech, p. 4; Morgan, p. 2.
^ Morgan, p. 3.
^ Armstrong, pp. 4–6; Morgan, pp. 2–3; Phillips, p. 13.
^ Phillips, pp. 17–18; Armstrong, p. 8; Morgan, pp. 10–11.
^ Phillips, p. 16; Leech, pp. 4–5.
^ Morgan, pp. 9–10.
^ Phillips, p. 20; Armstrong, p. 5.
^ Armstrong, p. 6; Morgan, pp. 11–12.
^ Armstrong, p. 1.
^ Armstrong, pp. 3–4; Phillips, pp. 20–21.
^ ^a ^b ^c Armstrong, pp. 8–10.
^ Armstrong, pp. 10–11.
^ Armstrong, pp. 12–14.
^ Hoogenboom, pp. 120–121; Armstrong, p. 14.
^ Armstrong, pp. 15–16.
^ Hoogenboom, pp. 125–126; Armstrong, pp. 18–22.
^ Armstrong, pp. 22–23.
^ Hoogenboom, pp. 128–130; Armstrong, pp. 24–25.
^ Armstrong, pp. 25–29; Phillips, p. 21.
^ Hoogenboom, pp. 136–141; Armstrong, pp. 30–33.
^ ^a ^b Hoogenboom, pp. 141–143; Armstrong, pp. 33–36.
^ Hoogenboom, pp. 146–148; Armstrong, pp. 36–38.
^ ^a ^b ^c Armstrong, pp. 38–41; Phillips, p. 21.
^ Armstrong, pp. 43–44.
^ ^a ^b Armstrong, pp. 44–45.
^ Hoogenboom, pp. 157–158; Armstrong, pp. 47–55.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Hoogenboom, pp. 162–164; Armstrong, p. 63–65.
^ ^a ^b ^c Hoogenboom, pp. 166–168; Armstrong, pp. 66–69.
^ Armstrong, pp. 70–71.
^ Hoogenboom, pp. 168–169; Armstrong, pp. 72–73.
^ Hoogenboom, pp. 170–171; Armstrong, pp. 75–77.
^ Armstrong, pp. 78–80.
^ Hoogenboom, pp. 172–173; Armstrong, pp. 80–82.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Armstrong, pp. 84–91.
^ ^a ^b Armstrong, pp. 95–96.
^ Armstrong, pp. 98–99.
^ Armstrong, pp. 99–101.
^ ^a ^b ^c Armstrong, pp. 103–105.
^ Morgan, pp. 28–30.
^ ^a ^b ^c Morgan, pp. 30–31.
^ ^a ^b Morgan, pp. 31–33; Leech, pp. 12, 21.
^ ^a ^b Leech, pp. 11–12.
^ ^a ^b ^c Morgan, pp. 34–35.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g Morgan, pp. 37–39; Leech, pp. 16–20.
^ ^a ^b Morgan, pp. 39–40.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Morgan, pp. 40–41; Weisenburger, pp. 78–80.
^ ^a ^b Morgan, p. 42.
^ ^a ^b Morgan, p. 43.
^ McElroy, p. 31.
^ Leech, p. 20.
^ Leech, p. 37.
^ Morgan, p. 47.
^ Horner, pp. 180–181.
^ Morgan, pp. 46–47; Horner, pp. 181–182.
^ Leech, pp. 36–37; Phillips, pp. 42–44.
^ Morgan, p. 55.
^ Phillips, pp. 60–61.
^ Morgan, pp. 73–74.
^ Horner, pp. 59–60, 72–78.
^ Horner, pp. 80–81.
^ Phillips, pp. 27, 42–43.
^ Phillips, p. 27.
^ Morgan, p. 54.
^ Morgan, pp. 59–60.
^ Morgan, pp. 60–62.
^ Jensen, pp. 150–151.
^ McKinley, p. 464.
^ Jensen, pp. 151–153.
^ Horner, p. 46.
^ Morgan, pp. 117–119.
^ Williams, p. 50.
^ Horner, pp. 86–87.
^ Williams, p. 117.
^ Gould, p. 7.
^ Williams, p. 122.
^ Horner, pp. 92–96.
^ Morgan, pp. 128–129.
^ Morgan, pp. 129–130.
^ ^a ^b Morgan, pp. 130–134.
^ Phillips, p. 67.
^ Phillips, pp. 69–70.
^ Phillips, p. 61.
^ Horner, p. 81.
^ Horner, p. 92.
^ Jones, p. 103.
^ Jones, p. 105.
^ Williams, p. 57.
^ Jones, pp. 119–125.
^ Jones, pp. 117–119.
^ Phillips, pp. 71–72.
^ Horner, pp. 159–162.
^ Williams, p. 59.
^ Phillips, pp. 52, 81–82.
^ Cherny, pp. 55–56.
^ Jones, p. 177.
^ Gould, pp. 10–11.
^ Leech, pp. 85–87.
^ ^a ^b Williams, pp. 130–131.
^ ^a ^b Leech, pp. 88–89.
^ Harpine, p. 52.
^ Williams, pp. 131, 226.
^ Jones, p. 285.
^ Jones, pp. 176–177.
^ Horner, pp. 272, 318.
^ Jones, p. 332.
^ Leech, p. 95.
^ Kazin, p. 68.
^ Phillips, p. 75.
^ Morgan, p. 184.
^ Kazin, pp. 76–77.
^ Williams, p. xi; Phillips, pp. 3, 77.
^ Phillips, pp. 73–77.
^ Phillips, p. 77.
^ Phillips, pp. 207–208.
^ ^a ^b ^c Gould, pp. 17–18.
^ ^a ^b ^c Morgan, pp. 194–195, 285; Leech, pp. 152–153.
^ Gould, p. 19.
^ Gould, p. 15; Horner, pp. 236–238.
^ Gould, p. 14.
^ Morgan, pp. 199–200.
^ Phillips, p. 127.
^ Gould, pp. 16–17, 174–176.
^ Connolly, p. 29–31.
^ Horner, pp. 139–140, 240–241.
^ Gould, p. 60.
^ Gould, p. 61.
^ Leech, p. 148.
^ Gould, pp. 65–66.
^ Gould, pp. 68–70.
^ Gould, pp. 71–72.
^ Gould, p. 74.
^ Leech, pp. 171–172.
^ Leech, p. 173; Gould, pp. 78–79.
^ Gould, pp. 79–81.
^ Gould, pp. 86–87.
^ Gould, pp. 91–93.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 102–103.
^ Gould, p. 94; Leech, p. 191.
^ Leech, pp. 203–207.
^ Gould, p. 96.
^ Gould, pp. 97–98.
^ Gould, p. 101.
^ Morgan, pp. 467–468.
^ Leech, pp. 214–215.
^ Gould, pp. 104–106.
^ Gould, pp. 107–109.
^ Leech, pp. 249–252.
^ Gould, pp. 109–110.
^ Leech, pp. 253–258.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 110–112.
^ ^a ^b ^c Gould, pp. 112–113.
^ Gould, p. 117.
^ Gould, p. 116.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 118–119.
^ Gould, pp. 120–121.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 142–143.
^ Gould, pp. 144–150; Morgan, p. 320.
^ Gould, p. 48.
^ Morgan, p. 222.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 49–50.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 98–99.
^ Morgan, p. 223.
^ Morgan, p. 225.
^ McCormick, p. 162.
^ McCormick, p. 155.
^ Gould, p. 201.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 202–204.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 220–222.
^ ^a ^b Lafeber, p. 714.
^ Gould, p. 233.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 196–198.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d McCullough, pp. 256–259.
^ ^a ^b ^c Gould, p. 40.
^ Gould, p. 41.
^ Morgan, pp. 211–212.
^ Gould, pp. 42–44.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 44–45.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 45–46.
^ Morgan, pp. 217–218.
^ Nichols, p. 586; Gould, p. 46.
^ Morgan, pp. 218–219.
^ Gould, pp. 169–171.
^ Gould, p. 94.
^ ^a ^b Semonche, p. 374.
^ Pratt, p. 29.
^ Federal Judicial Center.
^ ^a ^b ^c Gould, pp. 153–154.
^ Louisiana Historical Assoc, Cohen.
^ Gould, p. 155.
^ Bacote, p. 234.
^ ^a ^b Gould, pp. 156–157.
^ Bacote, pp. 235–237; Leech, p. 348.
^ Gould, pp. 159–160; Phillips, p. 149.
^ Gould, pp. 207–208.
^ Gould, pp. 213–214.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Gould, pp. 215–217.
^ Phillips, pp. 120–122.
^ Leech, pp. 531–533.
^ Horner, pp. 260–266.
^ Gould, p. 218.
^ Leech, pp. 540–542.
^ Gould, pp. 219–220.
^ Gould, pp. 226–227; Leech, pp. 543–544.
^ Gould, pp. 227–228; Leech, pp. 544–546.
^ Leech, pp. 549–557.
^ Gould, p. 228.
^ Gould, p. 229; Leech, p. 558.
^ ^a ^b Leech, p. 559.
^ Miller, pp. 289–290.
^ Gould, pp. 247–249.
^ Miller, p. 294.
^ ^a ^b Miller, pp. 298–300.
^ Gould, pp. 250–251.
^ Miller, pp. 297–298.
^ Miller, pp. 300–301.
^ Miller, pp. 301–302.
^ Leech, pp. 596–597; Miller, pp. 312–315.
^ Miller, pp. 315–317; Morgan, pp. 401–402.
^ Leech, p. 599.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Leech, pp. 600–601; Miller, pp. 318–319; Morgan, pp. 401–402.
^ Miller, pp. 331–332.
^ Miller, pp. 321–330.
^ ^a ^b ^c Gould, p. 252.
^ Morgan, pp. 402–403.
^ McElroy, p. 167.
^ Morgan, p. 403.
^ ^a ^b Miller, pp. 348.
^ Leech, p. 602.
^ McElroy, pp. 189–193; Morgan, p. 406.
^ ^a ^b McElroy, p. 189.
^ Olcott, p. 388.
^ Phillips, p. 161.
^ Morgan, p. 404.
^ Morgan, p. 472.
^ Nice, p. 448.
^ Klinghard, pp. 736–760.
^ Rauchway, pp. 242–244.
^ Korzi, p. 281.
^ Phillips, pp. 156–157.
^ Phillips, pp. 163–164.
^ Phillips, p. 154.
^ Phillips, p. 99.
^ Morgan, p. 468.
^ Morgan, p. 473.

Bibliography

Books

Armstrong, William H. (2000). Major McKinley: William McKinley and the Civil War. Kent, Ohio: The Kent State University Press. ISBN 978-0-87338-657-9.
Cherny, Robert W. (1994). A Righteous Cause: The Life of William Jennings Bryan. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN 978-0-8061-2667-8.
Gould, Lewis L. (1980). The Presidency of William McKinley. American Presidency. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-0206-3.
Harpine, William D. (2005). From the Front Porch to the Front Page: McKinley and Bryan in the 1896 Presidential Campaign. Presidential Rhetoric. Vol. 13. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-1-58544-559-2.
Hoogenboom, Ari (1995). Rutherford Hayes: Warrior and President. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-0641-2.
Horner, William T. (2010). Ohio's Kingmaker: Mark Hanna, Man and Myth. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. ISBN 978-0-8214-1894-9.
Jensen, Richard (1971). The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888–1896. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-39825-9.
Jones, Stanley L. (1964). The Presidential Election of 1896. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-03094-0.
Kazin, Michael (2006). A Godly Hero: The Life of William Jennings Bryan. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-375-41135-9.
Leech, Margaret (1959). In the Days of McKinley. New York: Harper and Brothers. OCLC 456809.
McCullough, David (1977). The Path Between the Seas: The Creation of the Panama Canal 1870–1914. New York: Touchstone. ISBN 978-0-671-24409-5.
McElroy, Richard L. (1996). William McKinley and Our America (softcover ed.). Canton, Ohio: Stark County Historical Society. ISBN 978-0-9634712-1-5.
McKinley, William (1893). Speeches and Addresses of William McKinley. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Miller, Scott (2011). The President and the Assassin. New York: Random House. ISBN 978-1-4000-6752-7.
Morgan, H. Wayne (2003). William McKinley and His America (revised ed.). Kent, Ohio: The Kent State University Press. ISBN 978-0-87338-765-1.
Olcott, Charles (1916). The Life of William McKinley. Vol. 2. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Retrieved March 23, 2012.
Phillips, Kevin (2003). William McKinley. New York: Times Books. ISBN 978-0-8050-6953-2.
Pratt, Walter F. (1999). The Supreme Court under Edward Douglass White, 1910–1921. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press. ISBN 978-1-57003-309-4.
Semonche, John E. (2009). "McKenna, Joseph". In Newman, Roger K. (ed.). The Yale Biographical Dictionary of American Law. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-11300-6.
Williams, R. Hal (2010). Realigning America: McKinley, Bryan and the Remarkable Election of 1896. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-1721-0.

Articles

Bacote, Clarence A. (July 1959). "Negro officeholders in Georgia under President McKinley". The Journal of Negro History. 44 (3). Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of African American Life and History, Inc.: 217–239. doi:10.2307/2716432. JSTOR 2716432.
Connolly, Michael J. (2010). "'I Make Politics My Recreation': Vice President Garret A. Hobart and Nineteenth Century Republican Business Politics". New Jersey History. 125 (1). Newark, New Jersey: New Jersey Historical Society: 29–31. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
Klinghard, Daniel P. (2005). "Grover Cleveland, William McKinley and the Emergence of the President as Party Leader". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 35 (4). Washington, D.C.: Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress: 736–760. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2005.00274.x. JSTOR 27552726.
Korzi, Michael J. (January 2004). "A New Migration of Political Forces: Party Decline and Presidential Leadership in Late Nineteenth-Century America". Polity. 36 (2). Staten Island, New York: Northeastern Political Science Association: 251–282. JSTOR 3235481.
Lafeber, Walter (1986). "The 'Lion in the Path': The U.S. Emergence as a World Power". Political Science Quarterly. 101 (5). New York: Academy of Political Science: 705–718. doi:10.2307/2150973. JSTOR 2150973.
McCormick, Thomas (1963). "Insular Imperialism and the Open Door: The China Market and the Spanish-American War". Pacific Historical Review. 32 (2). Berkeley, California: University of California Press: 155–169. JSTOR 4492154. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Nice, David C. (1984). "The Influence of War and Party System Aging on the Ranking of Presidents". The Western Political Quarterly. 37 (3). Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah: 443–455. doi:10.2307/448445. JSTOR 448445. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Nichols, Jeannette P. (1933). "Silver Diplomacy". Political Science Quarterly. 48 (4). New York: Academy of Political Science: 565–588. doi:10.2307/2142930. JSTOR 2142930. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Rauchway, Eric (2005). "William McKinley and Us". The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. 4 (3). East Lansing, Michigan: The Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era: 235–253. doi:10.1017/S1537781400002644. JSTOR 25144402. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
Weisenburger, Francis P. (1934). "The Time of Mark Hanna's First Acquaintance with McKinley". The Mississippi Valley Historical Review. 21 (1). Bloomington, Indiana: Organization of American Historians: 78–80. doi:10.2307/1896406. JSTOR 1896406. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Online

"Biographical Dictionary of the Federal Judiciary". Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center. Retrieved March 4, 2012. searches run from page, "select research categories" then check "court type" and "nominating president", then select U.S. District Courts (or U.S. Circuit Courts) and also William McKinley.
"Walter l. Cohen". Louisiana Historical Assoc. Retrieved March 4, 2012.
"Sessions of Congress" (PDF). Congressional Directory. United States Senate. Retrieved March 11, 2012.

External links

Essay on William McKinley and shorter essays on each member of his cabinet and First Lady from the Miller Center of Public Affairs
William McKinley: A Resource Guide from the Library of Congress
McKinley Assassination Ink: A Documentary History
William McKinley Presidential Library and Memorial
Works by William McKinley at Project Gutenberg, presidential messages
A film clip McKinley's inaugural parade is available for viewing at the Internet Archive
Q&A interview with Scott Miller on The President and the Assassin, June 22, 2011

Template:Persondata

[Medal_of_Honor-24] In 1896, some of McKinley's comrades lobbied for him to be belatedly awarded the Medal of Honor for his bravery that day; Lieutenant General Nelson A. Miles was inclined to grant McKinley the award, but when the then-President-elect heard about the effort, he declined it. See Armstrong, pp. 38–41; Phillips, p. 21.

[Twentieth_Amendment-51] Until the ratification of the 20th Amendment in 1933, the Constitution prescribed that Congress begin its regular sessions in early December. See US Senate, Sessions of Congress.

[Seventeenth_Amendment-73] Before the passage of the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1913, Senators were elected by state legislatures.

[FOOTNOTELeech4Morgan2-1] Leech, p. 4; Morgan, p. 2.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan3-2] Morgan, p. 3.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong4–6Morgan2–3Phillips13-3] Armstrong, pp. 4–6; Morgan, pp. 2–3; Phillips, p. 13.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips17–18Armstrong8Morgan10–11-4] Phillips, pp. 17–18; Armstrong, p. 8; Morgan, pp. 10–11.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips16Leech4–5-5] Phillips, p. 16; Leech, pp. 4–5.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan9–10-6] Morgan, pp. 9–10.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips20Armstrong5-7] Phillips, p. 20; Armstrong, p. 5.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong6Morgan11–12-8] Armstrong, p. 6; Morgan, pp. 11–12.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong1-9] Armstrong, p. 1.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong3–4Phillips20–21-10] Armstrong, pp. 3–4; Phillips, pp. 20–21.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong8–10-11] Armstrong, pp. 8–10.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong10–11-12] Armstrong, pp. 10–11.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong12–14-13] Armstrong, pp. 12–14.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom120–121Armstrong14-14] Hoogenboom, pp. 120–121; Armstrong, p. 14.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong15–16-15] Armstrong, pp. 15–16.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom125–126Armstrong18–22-16] Hoogenboom, pp. 125–126; Armstrong, pp. 18–22.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong22–23-17] Armstrong, pp. 22–23.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom128–130Armstrong24–25-18] Hoogenboom, pp. 128–130; Armstrong, pp. 24–25.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong25–29Phillips21-19] Armstrong, pp. 25–29; Phillips, p. 21.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom136–141Armstrong30–33-20] Hoogenboom, pp. 136–141; Armstrong, pp. 30–33.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom141–143Armstrong33–36-21] Hoogenboom, pp. 141–143; Armstrong, pp. 33–36.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom146–148Armstrong36–38-22] Hoogenboom, pp. 146–148; Armstrong, pp. 36–38.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong38–41Phillips21-23] Armstrong, pp. 38–41; Phillips, p. 21.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong43–44-25] Armstrong, pp. 43–44.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong44–45-26] Armstrong, pp. 44–45.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom157–158Armstrong47–55-27] Hoogenboom, pp. 157–158; Armstrong, pp. 47–55.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom162–164Armstrong63–65-28] Hoogenboom, pp. 162–164; Armstrong, p. 63–65.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom166–168Armstrong66–69-29] Hoogenboom, pp. 166–168; Armstrong, pp. 66–69.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong70–71-30] Armstrong, pp. 70–71.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom168–169Armstrong72–73-31] Hoogenboom, pp. 168–169; Armstrong, pp. 72–73.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom170–171Armstrong75–77-32] Hoogenboom, pp. 170–171; Armstrong, pp. 75–77.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong78–80-33] Armstrong, pp. 78–80.

[FOOTNOTEHoogenboom172–173Armstrong80–82-34] Hoogenboom, pp. 172–173; Armstrong, pp. 80–82.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong84–91-35] Armstrong, pp. 84–91.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong95–96-36] Armstrong, pp. 95–96.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong98–99-37] Armstrong, pp. 98–99.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong99–101-38] Armstrong, pp. 99–101.

[FOOTNOTEArmstrong103–105-39] Armstrong, pp. 103–105.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan28–30-40] Morgan, pp. 28–30.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan30–31-41] Morgan, pp. 30–31.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan31–33Leech12,_21-42] Morgan, pp. 31–33; Leech, pp. 12, 21.

[FOOTNOTELeech11–12-43] Leech, pp. 11–12.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan34–35-44] Morgan, pp. 34–35.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan37–39Leech16–20-45] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g Morgan, pp. 37–39; Leech, pp. 16–20.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan39–40-46] Morgan, pp. 39–40.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan40–41Weisenburger78–80-47] Morgan, pp. 40–41; Weisenburger, pp. 78–80.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan42-48] Morgan, p. 42.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan43-49] Morgan, p. 43.

[FOOTNOTEMcElroy31-50] McElroy, p. 31.

[FOOTNOTELeech20-52] Leech, p. 20.

[FOOTNOTELeech37-53] Leech, p. 37.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan47-54] Morgan, p. 47.

[FOOTNOTEHorner180–181-55] Horner, pp. 180–181.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan46–47Horner181–182-56] Morgan, pp. 46–47; Horner, pp. 181–182.

[FOOTNOTELeech36–37Phillips42–44-57] Leech, pp. 36–37; Phillips, pp. 42–44.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan55-58] Morgan, p. 55.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips60–61-59] Phillips, pp. 60–61.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan73–74-60] Morgan, pp. 73–74.

[FOOTNOTEHorner59–60,_72–78-61] Horner, pp. 59–60, 72–78.

[FOOTNOTEHorner80–81-62] Horner, pp. 80–81.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips27,_42–43-63] Phillips, pp. 27, 42–43.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips27-64] Phillips, p. 27.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan54-65] Morgan, p. 54.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan59–60-66] Morgan, pp. 59–60.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan60–62-67] Morgan, pp. 60–62.

[FOOTNOTEJensen150–151-68] Jensen, pp. 150–151.

[FOOTNOTEMcKinley464-69] McKinley, p. 464.

[FOOTNOTEJensen151–153-70] Jensen, pp. 151–153.

[FOOTNOTEHorner46-71] Horner, p. 46.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan117–119-72] Morgan, pp. 117–119.

[FOOTNOTEWilliams50-74] Williams, p. 50.

[FOOTNOTEHorner86–87-75] Horner, pp. 86–87.

[FOOTNOTEWilliams117-76] Williams, p. 117.

[FOOTNOTEGould7-77] Gould, p. 7.

[FOOTNOTEWilliams122-78] Williams, p. 122.

[FOOTNOTEHorner92–96-79] Horner, pp. 92–96.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan128–129-80] Morgan, pp. 128–129.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan129–130-81] Morgan, pp. 129–130.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan130–134-82] Morgan, pp. 130–134.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips67-83] Phillips, p. 67.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips69–70-84] Phillips, pp. 69–70.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips61-85] Phillips, p. 61.

[FOOTNOTEHorner81-86] Horner, p. 81.

[FOOTNOTEHorner92-87] Horner, p. 92.

[FOOTNOTEJones103-88] Jones, p. 103.

[FOOTNOTEJones105-89] Jones, p. 105.

[FOOTNOTEWilliams57-90] Williams, p. 57.

[FOOTNOTEJones119–125-91] Jones, pp. 119–125.

[FOOTNOTEJones117–119-92] Jones, pp. 117–119.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips71–72-93] Phillips, pp. 71–72.

[FOOTNOTEHorner159–162-94] Horner, pp. 159–162.

[FOOTNOTEWilliams59-95] Williams, p. 59.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips52,_81–82-96] Phillips, pp. 52, 81–82.

[FOOTNOTECherny55–56-97] Cherny, pp. 55–56.

[FOOTNOTEJones177-98] Jones, p. 177.

[FOOTNOTEGould10–11-99] Gould, pp. 10–11.

[FOOTNOTELeech85–87-100] Leech, pp. 85–87.

[FOOTNOTEWilliams130–131-101] Williams, pp. 130–131.

[FOOTNOTELeech88–89-102] Leech, pp. 88–89.

[FOOTNOTEHarpine52-103] Harpine, p. 52.

[FOOTNOTEWilliams131,_226-104] Williams, pp. 131, 226.

[FOOTNOTEJones285-105] Jones, p. 285.

[FOOTNOTEJones176–177-106] Jones, pp. 176–177.

[FOOTNOTEHorner272,_318-107] Horner, pp. 272, 318.

[FOOTNOTEJones332-108] Jones, p. 332.

[FOOTNOTELeech95-109] Leech, p. 95.

[FOOTNOTEKazin68-110] Kazin, p. 68.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips75-111] Phillips, p. 75.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan184-112] Morgan, p. 184.

[FOOTNOTEKazin76–77-113] Kazin, pp. 76–77.

[FOOTNOTEWilliamsxiPhillips3,_77-114] Williams, p. xi; Phillips, pp. 3, 77.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips73–77-115] Phillips, pp. 73–77.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips77-116] Phillips, p. 77.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips207–208-117] Phillips, pp. 207–208.

[FOOTNOTEGould17–18-118] Gould, pp. 17–18.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan194–195,_285Leech152–153-119] Morgan, pp. 194–195, 285; Leech, pp. 152–153.

[FOOTNOTEGould19-120] Gould, p. 19.

[FOOTNOTEGould15Horner236–238-121] Gould, p. 15; Horner, pp. 236–238.

[FOOTNOTEGould14-122] Gould, p. 14.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan199–200-123] Morgan, pp. 199–200.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips127-124] Phillips, p. 127.

[FOOTNOTEGould16–17,_174–176-125] Gould, pp. 16–17, 174–176.

[FOOTNOTEConnolly29–31-126] Connolly, p. 29–31.

[FOOTNOTEHorner139–140,_240–241-127] Horner, pp. 139–140, 240–241.

[FOOTNOTEGould60-128] Gould, p. 60.

[FOOTNOTEGould61-129] Gould, p. 61.

[FOOTNOTELeech148-130] Leech, p. 148.

[FOOTNOTEGould65–66-131] Gould, pp. 65–66.

[FOOTNOTEGould68–70-132] Gould, pp. 68–70.

[FOOTNOTEGould71–72-133] Gould, pp. 71–72.

[FOOTNOTEGould74-134] Gould, p. 74.

[FOOTNOTELeech171–172-135] Leech, pp. 171–172.

[FOOTNOTELeech173Gould78–79-136] Leech, p. 173; Gould, pp. 78–79.

[FOOTNOTEGould79–81-137] Gould, pp. 79–81.

[FOOTNOTEGould86–87-138] Gould, pp. 86–87.

[FOOTNOTEGould91–93-139] Gould, pp. 91–93.

[FOOTNOTEGould102–103-140] Gould, pp. 102–103.

[FOOTNOTEGould94Leech191-141] Gould, p. 94; Leech, p. 191.

[FOOTNOTELeech203–207-142] Leech, pp. 203–207.

[FOOTNOTEGould96-143] Gould, p. 96.

[FOOTNOTEGould97–98-144] Gould, pp. 97–98.

[FOOTNOTEGould101-145] Gould, p. 101.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan467–468-146] Morgan, pp. 467–468.

[FOOTNOTELeech214–215-147] Leech, pp. 214–215.

[FOOTNOTEGould104–106-148] Gould, pp. 104–106.

[FOOTNOTEGould107–109-149] Gould, pp. 107–109.

[FOOTNOTELeech249–252-150] Leech, pp. 249–252.

[FOOTNOTEGould109–110-151] Gould, pp. 109–110.

[FOOTNOTELeech253–258-152] Leech, pp. 253–258.

[FOOTNOTEGould110–112-153] Gould, pp. 110–112.

[FOOTNOTEGould112–113-154] Gould, pp. 112–113.

[FOOTNOTEGould117-155] Gould, p. 117.

[FOOTNOTEGould116-156] Gould, p. 116.

[FOOTNOTEGould118–119-157] Gould, pp. 118–119.

[FOOTNOTEGould120–121-158] Gould, pp. 120–121.

[FOOTNOTEGould142–143-159] Gould, pp. 142–143.

[FOOTNOTEGould144–150Morgan320-160] Gould, pp. 144–150; Morgan, p. 320.

[FOOTNOTEGould48-161] Gould, p. 48.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan222-162] Morgan, p. 222.

[FOOTNOTEGould49–50-163] Gould, pp. 49–50.

[FOOTNOTEGould98–99-164] Gould, pp. 98–99.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan223-165] Morgan, p. 223.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan225-166] Morgan, p. 225.

[FOOTNOTEMcCormick162-167] McCormick, p. 162.

[FOOTNOTEMcCormick155-168] McCormick, p. 155.

[FOOTNOTEGould201-169] Gould, p. 201.

[FOOTNOTEGould202–204-170] Gould, pp. 202–204.

[FOOTNOTEGould220–222-171] Gould, pp. 220–222.

[FOOTNOTELafeber714-172] Lafeber, p. 714.

[FOOTNOTEGould233-173] Gould, p. 233.

[FOOTNOTEGould196–198-174] Gould, pp. 196–198.

[FOOTNOTEMcCullough256–259-175] McCullough, pp. 256–259.

[FOOTNOTEGould40-176] Gould, p. 40.

[FOOTNOTEGould41-177] Gould, p. 41.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan211–212-178] Morgan, pp. 211–212.

[FOOTNOTEGould42–44-179] Gould, pp. 42–44.

[FOOTNOTEGould44–45-180] Gould, pp. 44–45.

[FOOTNOTEGould45–46-181] Gould, pp. 45–46.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan217–218-182] Morgan, pp. 217–218.

[FOOTNOTENichols586Gould46-183] Nichols, p. 586; Gould, p. 46.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan218–219-184] Morgan, pp. 218–219.

[FOOTNOTEGould169–171-185] Gould, pp. 169–171.

[FOOTNOTEGould94-186] Gould, p. 94.

[FOOTNOTESemonche374-187] Semonche, p. 374.

[FOOTNOTEPratt29-188] Pratt, p. 29.

[FOOTNOTEFederal_Judicial_Center-189] Federal Judicial Center.

[FOOTNOTEGould153–154-190] Gould, pp. 153–154.

[FOOTNOTELouisiana_Historical_Assoc,_''Cohen''-191] Louisiana Historical Assoc, Cohen.

[FOOTNOTEGould155-192] Gould, p. 155.

[FOOTNOTEBacote234-193] Bacote, p. 234.

[FOOTNOTEGould156–157-194] Gould, pp. 156–157.

[FOOTNOTEBacote235–237Leech348-195] Bacote, pp. 235–237; Leech, p. 348.

[FOOTNOTEGould159–160Phillips149-196] Gould, pp. 159–160; Phillips, p. 149.

[FOOTNOTEGould207–208-197] Gould, pp. 207–208.

[FOOTNOTEGould213–214-198] Gould, pp. 213–214.

[FOOTNOTEGould215–217-199] Gould, pp. 215–217.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips120–122-200] Phillips, pp. 120–122.

[FOOTNOTELeech531–533-201] Leech, pp. 531–533.

[FOOTNOTEHorner260–266-202] Horner, pp. 260–266.

[FOOTNOTEGould218-203] Gould, p. 218.

[FOOTNOTELeech540–542-204] Leech, pp. 540–542.

[FOOTNOTEGould219–220-205] Gould, pp. 219–220.

[FOOTNOTEGould226–227Leech543–544-206] Gould, pp. 226–227; Leech, pp. 543–544.

[FOOTNOTEGould227–228Leech544–546-207] Gould, pp. 227–228; Leech, pp. 544–546.

[FOOTNOTELeech549–557-208] Leech, pp. 549–557.

[FOOTNOTEGould228-209] Gould, p. 228.

[FOOTNOTEGould229Leech558-210] Gould, p. 229; Leech, p. 558.

[FOOTNOTELeech559-211] Leech, p. 559.

[FOOTNOTEMiller289–290-212] Miller, pp. 289–290.

[FOOTNOTEGould247–249-213] Gould, pp. 247–249.

[FOOTNOTEMiller294-214] Miller, p. 294.

[FOOTNOTEMiller298–300-215] Miller, pp. 298–300.

[FOOTNOTEGould250–251-216] Gould, pp. 250–251.

[FOOTNOTEMiller297–298-217] Miller, pp. 297–298.

[FOOTNOTEMiller300–301-218] Miller, pp. 300–301.

[FOOTNOTEMiller301–302-219] Miller, pp. 301–302.

[FOOTNOTELeech596–597Miller312–315-220] Leech, pp. 596–597; Miller, pp. 312–315.

[FOOTNOTEMiller315–317Morgan401–402-221] Miller, pp. 315–317; Morgan, pp. 401–402.

[FOOTNOTELeech599-222] Leech, p. 599.

[FOOTNOTELeech600–601Miller318–319Morgan401–402-223] Leech, pp. 600–601; Miller, pp. 318–319; Morgan, pp. 401–402.

[FOOTNOTEMiller331–332-224] Miller, pp. 331–332.

[FOOTNOTEMiller321–330-225] Miller, pp. 321–330.

[FOOTNOTEGould252-226] Gould, p. 252.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan402–403-227] Morgan, pp. 402–403.

[FOOTNOTEMcElroy167-228] McElroy, p. 167.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan403-229] Morgan, p. 403.

[FOOTNOTEMiller348-230] Miller, pp. 348.

[FOOTNOTELeech602-231] Leech, p. 602.

[FOOTNOTEMcElroy189–193Morgan406-232] McElroy, pp. 189–193; Morgan, p. 406.

[FOOTNOTEMcElroy189-233] McElroy, p. 189.

[FOOTNOTEOlcott388-234] Olcott, p. 388.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips161-235] Phillips, p. 161.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan404-236] Morgan, p. 404.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan472-237] Morgan, p. 472.

[FOOTNOTENice448-238] Nice, p. 448.

[FOOTNOTEKlinghard736–760-239] Klinghard, pp. 736–760.

[FOOTNOTERauchway242–244-240] Rauchway, pp. 242–244.

[FOOTNOTEKorzi281-241] Korzi, p. 281.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips156–157-242] Phillips, pp. 156–157.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips163–164-243] Phillips, pp. 163–164.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips154-244] Phillips, p. 154.

[FOOTNOTEPhillips99-245] Phillips, p. 99.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan468-246] Morgan, p. 468.

[FOOTNOTEMorgan473-247] Morgan, p. 473.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[a]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

[40]

[41]

[42]

[43]

[44]

[45]

[46]

[47]

[48]

[49]

[b]

[50]

[51]

[52]

[53]

[54]

[55]

[56]

[57]

[58]

[59]

[60]

[61]

[62]

[63]

[64]

[65]

[66]

[67]

[68]

[69]

[70]

[c]

[71]

[72]

[73]

[74]

[75]

[76]

[77]

[78]

[79]

[80]

[81]

[82]

[83]

[84]

[85]

[86]

[87]

[88]

[89]

[90]

[91]

[92]

[93]

[94]

[95]

[96]

[97]

Authority control databases
International	ISNI VIAF FAST WorldCat
National	Germany United States France BnF data Japan Australia Czech Republic Russia Spain Netherlands Norway Greece Sweden Poland Vatican Israel Catalonia Belgium
Academics	CiNii
Artists	ULAN Discography of American Historical Recordings
People	US Congress Trove Deutsche Biographie DDB
Other	IdRef NARA SNAC 2 Te Papa (New Zealand)