User talk:Bovineone

Hi! Please use this link to leave me a new message. Thanks.

This is Bovineone's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Tiptoety ^talk 05:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Autoland, 15th AugustIt is encouraging to know that you were sufficiently interested in my contribution to the Autoland article to take the trouble to move the diagram. Unfortunately, the result depends on the screen resolution. The change looks OK at 1600x1024 but with my old eyes I usually use 1024x768, where as it happens the change breaks up the text in an awkward way. Unless you have a reason for the edit which I have not understood, may I please ask you to leave the diagram at the end of that section? I have not previously used Talk and just hope this is the right way to send a message. Kind regards Roy Easson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roy Easson (talk • contribs) 15:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]I've centered it instead of trying to let it flow next to the text, which should work better for smaller screen widths. That article also has a lot of excessive verbosity in the historical sections and the writing style is a little atypical of wikipedia articles... I've considered adding {{tone}} on it, but didn't want to enumerate all of the specific issues. -- Bovineone (talk) 02:35, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]Thanks for what appears to be a very prompt response to my message. Centering the diagram is more elegant. Unfortunately it is now in the wrong section, so I would be grateful if it could appear at the end of Sect. 2.4, where it is mentioned in the last line of the text. I suppose I could use "undo" but I would prefer to have your agreement.--Roy Easson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roy Easson (talk • contribs) 14:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]Thanks for your reply and for adjusting the position of the diagram. Centering it is certainly more elegant. Unfortunately it is now in the wrong section - it should be at the end of Sect 2.4 where it is referred to in the text in the last line. I would be grateful if you would make that change (I don't like to use "undo").As for the style and so on - when I first looked at the item as it was at 17th March 2010 I did think about editing Sect. 2 to include the earlier period but abandoned that idea as too hard, so I split the existing text of Sect.2 into three subsections (in view of the exhortation about it being too long) and added Sects. 2.4 and 2.5, so a change of style was difficult to avoid.I could try to improve 2.4 and 2.5 if you have specific issues in mind.And I forgot ther tildes in my last message. Roy Easson (talk) 14:58, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]The original reasoning for the image placement was unclear because there was no WP:CAPTION on the image to provide context, so I've improved that also. Please review WP:TPYES and avoid excessive talk sections. I've added various style improvement templates on the article to suggest ways of improving it. In general, I feel there is far too much verbosity in the historical sections and its length is far beyond what a casual reader would have the attention span to read. For example, Engine is a similarly complex topic yet it still remains accessible to a casual reader. -- Bovineone (talk) 17:07, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]Need you to have a look into Mobile cloud computing PageHi Bovineone! I request you to have a look into this Article Mobile cloud computing.One guy is trying to do a lots of changes But he's in trouble i guess. I hope you can guide him. Abdul raja (talk) 14:34, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited United Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Beneath the Dark, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trevor Morgan and Chris Hayes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:ThresholdLogo.jpg⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThresholdLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here. I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again. If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page. If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 02:22, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Category:Tax evadersCategory:Tax evaders, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homonculus} 10:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]Category:Research In MotionCategory:Research In Motion, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]Article notability notificationHello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Electric Sheep (band), has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Electric Sheep (band)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 18:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thonArt & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - You are invited! File:Csaky madonna.jpg Hi Bovineone! The first ever Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 across the United States and Canada - including Austin! Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join! Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors. Bring a friend and a laptop! Come one, come all! Learn more here! SarahStierch (talk) 08:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]Merge discussion for Traffic Information Service – Broadcast

An article that you have been involved in editing, Traffic Information Service – Broadcast, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Technophant (talk) 19:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Intusoft

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.A tag has been placed on Intusoft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 09:35, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]Moo!Moo moo. Moo moo moo. (Nothing much. Saw you edited the Puffalump page and thought I'd say hi, using my crappy non-accounted IP address.) Moo! 66.90.154.65 (talk) 18:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]List of Tesla SuperchargersHello, Thanks for checking out my new list on Tesla superchargers. I knew that you put this article up for deletion, and I commend you in that due to Wikipedia's unwritten rules about boldness, however I wrote an objection on Talk:List of Tesla Superchargers. I would like to hear your opinions. Yonikasz (talk) 02:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]Realtors etcPlease see Category:Real estate brokers for discussion on renaming Hugo999 (talk) 00:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]ArbCom elections are now open!Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000. Since you had some involvement with the 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 11:45, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]Proposed deletion of rex (programming language)The article rex (programming language) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:Not notable, only one primary referenceWhile all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Be..anyone (talk) 19:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]Orphaned non-free image File:Phs-bulldog.png⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phs-bulldog.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bovineone. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]Proposed deletion of National Foundation for Cancer ResearchThe article National Foundation for Cancer Research has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:The WP page contains no significant content, recently displayed copyright information copied from the organization website, and is being used apparently for promotion. WP:NOTHOSTING applies.While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zefr (talk) 22:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]Nomination of National Foundation for Cancer Research for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Foundation for Cancer Research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Foundation for Cancer Research until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zefr (talk) 23:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]