User talk:Galobtter

Daily page views of User and User talk pages

User

User Talk

This is Galobtter's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Optional_RfA_candidate_poll#Shut this down?

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Optional_RfA_candidate_poll#Shut this down?. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:51, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	For all your work with the edit filters and other Wikipedia stuff Abote2 (talk) 18:13, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TfD Infobox Finnish municipality

Hello Galobtter!

You closed the TfD about Infobox Finnish municipality as NC. But it says:

Subst and delete
Delete after replacement
Keep until replacement
SPEEDY CLOSE ("is a wrapper since creation" and IP proposed it itself for substitution)

Seems the result would be "Replace (subst:) and (then) delete"? Not?

I today outsourced all the data code from the infobox to Category:Data Finland municipality templates, which is inside Category:Data templates. Cf. also Category:Template:Metadata Population. Now infoboxes or other pages can retrieve the data stored in the data templates indepent from the infobox. The replacement could start soon.

Could you adjust your closure? TerraCyprus (talk) 13:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TerraCyprus, I did not close the TfD as "subst and delete" because per the DRV started by Zackmann08 (Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 March 22#Template:Infobox_Finnish_municipality), it was unclear if the substitution should be done, and there was not enough discussion after the DRV (only one comment) for a consensus to subst and delete the template.

It looks the edits you have done have made substing viable; I would suggest starting another TfD to evaluate that (you can ping the participants of the previous discussion). Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:57, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But the DRV was relist, and in the relist only one objection occurred. So it is 3(4):1. The DRV apart from relist had endorse (Pppery). It was maybe unclear to Zackmann08 and the pro-relist voters, if the replacement had to be done. But even Zackmann08 only made a DRV, not an objection to replacement. Pigsonthewing asked for clarification regarding the DRV, but did not change his vote. TerraCyprus (talk) 15:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Template:Infobox Finnish municipality

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:Infobox Finnish municipality. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TerraCyprus (talk • contribs) 17:06, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]