Su equipo está dividido en cuanto a las preferencias de diseño. ¿Cómo puedes asegurarte de que todos se sientan escuchados y valorados?
Cuando tu equipo está dividido sobre las opciones de diseño, es clave fomentar un entorno inclusivo en el que cada opinión cuente. A continuación, te explicamos cómo navegar por estas diferencias:
- Fomentar los foros de discusión abiertos. Dale a cada miembro del equipo una plataforma para compartir sus ideas sin interrupciones.
- Implementar un sistema de votación. Esto puede ayudar al equipo a tomar decisiones democráticamente y a sentirse dueño de la dirección elegida.
- Destacar el valor de las diversas perspectivas. Recuerde al equipo que los diferentes puntos de vista conducen a diseños más innovadores y completos.
¿Cómo te aseguras de que se escuchen todas las voces durante los desacuerdos creativos?
Su equipo está dividido en cuanto a las preferencias de diseño. ¿Cómo puedes asegurarte de que todos se sientan escuchados y valorados?
Cuando tu equipo está dividido sobre las opciones de diseño, es clave fomentar un entorno inclusivo en el que cada opinión cuente. A continuación, te explicamos cómo navegar por estas diferencias:
- Fomentar los foros de discusión abiertos. Dale a cada miembro del equipo una plataforma para compartir sus ideas sin interrupciones.
- Implementar un sistema de votación. Esto puede ayudar al equipo a tomar decisiones democráticamente y a sentirse dueño de la dirección elegida.
- Destacar el valor de las diversas perspectivas. Recuerde al equipo que los diferentes puntos de vista conducen a diseños más innovadores y completos.
¿Cómo te aseguras de que se escuchen todas las voces durante los desacuerdos creativos?
-
First and foremost, ensure every team member’s opinions are genuinely heard and considered. Keeping an open mind is essential—diverse perspectives are often where innovation begins. When opinions clash, bring the focus back to the overarching goal - creating the best possible user experience. Start by gathering user feedback to guide the decision-making process. Ultimately, it’s about aligning with the user's needs and preferences, not the designer’s. Prioritizing the user ensures a design that truly serves its purpose.
-
Clearly articulate the problem the design needs to solve. Set specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound goals. Promote constructive feedback, focusing on the ideas, not the person. Gather feedback from real users to inform design decisions. Continuously refine the design based on feedback and testing. Implementing these strategies, you can foster a collaborative and inclusive design process, ensuring that everyone feels heard and valued.
-
I think having clear criteria to guide our decisions would make it easier to keep discussions focused. It would also be helpful if we could visualize different design options, so we’re not just debating in the abstract. Getting some outside feedback occasionally could also be useful, especially if we're stuck, and it might help us see things from a fresh perspective. Additionally, using a "pros and cons" list for each option could clarify strengths and weaknesses, while limiting decision-making time can help keep things moving. Focusing on small wins and iterations allows us to test ideas without full commitment, and practicing “Yes, and…” instead of “Yes, but…” keeps discussions positive.
-
To bridge the design divide, encourage open communication. Create a safe space where everyone can share their ideas without fear of judgment. Use methods like design charrettes to show ideas visually, which makes comparisons easier. Remember, compromise is important. Blending elements from different designs can lead to a unique and satisfying solution. For example, in a recent project, there was a heated debate between minimalist and maximalist designers. By combining the clean lines of the minimalist approach with bright colour accents from the maximalist style, we created a visually striking and functional design that everyone liked. Valuing diverse perspectives leads to innovative and inclusive solutions.
-
When my team is divided on design preferences, I make sure everyone gets a chance to share their ideas. We have open discussions where each person explains their thoughts. By listening to one another, we often find a solution that combines the best of everyone's ideas. This way, everyone feels heard and valued, and we can move forward together.
-
Creating a design culture where every voice is valued starts with structured inclusivity. In my experience, fostering a "context-first" discussion works wonders. Before diving into ideas, we align on project goals and user pain points, setting a framework that encourages alignment over bias. In cases of differing opinions, tools like dot-voting help visualize preferences quickly without sidelining any voice. Recently, at Stikkman UX, we used a design playback session where team members critiqued in rounds based on specific user needs—transforming feedback into insight-rich dialogue. By pivoting from “preferences” to “value for the user,” teams can find common ground while still honouring each individual’s perspective.
-
Instead of a lengthy feedback session, hold a brief, focused meeting where each team member shares their perspective concisely. Use targeted questions like, “What is your main concern with the design?” and “What solution do you suggest?” to quickly gather collective insights. User feedback also informs design on accessibility and usability, ensuring the product is inclusive and easy to navigate. Involving users in the design process creates experiences that align closely with their needs, boosting satisfaction and engagement. A methodology I find effective is Design Thinking, as it gives everyone a voice, encouraging diverse insights and collaborative problem-solving centered on user needs.
-
Go back to the needs and perspectives of the customer's customer. Better if you can actually ask a few to help the team decide. Also understand that you should balance the need for analysis with the impact of the choice - no point sweating a small choice when there might be larger choices to make which are more impactful, or more core to the overall design. If you can tweak it later with low effort and impact, just get on with the serious questions.
-
To ensure everyone feels heard and valued: Hold a Team Discussion: Let everyone share their ideas and reasons. Focus on User Needs: Base decisions on what’s best for the user, not personal preferences. Encourage Collaboration: Combine the best parts of different ideas. Stay Neutral: As a leader, mediate fairly without bias. This creates a balanced solution and strengthens teamwork.
-
When team opinions on design preferences clash, creating a structured environment for open dialogue is essential. Start by setting up a session where each team member presents their perspective, backed by data or reasoning, so everyone can understand the thought process behind each preference. Use empathy mapping or user journey exercises to align preferences with user needs, moving the focus from individual opinions to user outcomes. Summarize the ideas and gather anonymous feedback to ensure honest input, then find common threads and integrate elements that align with project goals. This approach ensures every voice is acknowledged, fostering a sense of mutual respect.
Valorar este artículo
Lecturas más relevantes
-
Competencia cultural¿Cómo se puede inspirar la creatividad y la innovación en el personal del museo?
-
Resolución creativa de problemas¿Cómo abordarías las dinámicas de poder que pueden influir en las visiones creativas contradictorias dentro de tu equipo de diseño?
-
Estrategias creativas¿Cómo navegas por visiones creativas contradictorias dentro de tu equipo para garantizar una estrategia cohesiva?
-
Producción teatral¿Cuáles son las prácticas recomendadas para diseñar conjuntos que representen con precisión diversas culturas?