Revert "Improve single-element detection (#4)" #12
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 09766e3. Any other modern feature used in this fork can either be transpiled by Babel or polyfilled for IE 11. But nodes being an instance of the EventTarget constructor cannot be polyfilled. And IE 11 does not expose EventTarget as a constructor. Reverting the detection to the method of the EventTarget interface avoids relying on a non-polyfillable API.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit 09766e3.
Any other modern feature used in this fork can either be transpiled by Babel or polyfilled for IE 11. But nodes being an instance of the EventTarget constructor cannot be polyfilled. And IE 11 does not expose
EventTarget as a constructor.
Reverting the detection to the method of the EventTarget interface avoids relying on a non-polyfillable API.
This is based on the discussion happening in #8.