-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename K6 CRD to TestRun #226
Comments
It appears that general Kubernetes guideline is to make "roundtrip convertible" CRD types which more commonly would mean making them backwards compatible. In our case, we should probably try to be backwards compatible with Additionally, we could use this as opportunity to switch from
|
We'll support both I'm leaving this issue open for now. What is left:
|
|
Not sure if it's related to this change but (on January 24, 2025) the K6s operator doesn't work (looping restart) and it complains about following error: The image is: |
Hi @jeromeguillaume, yes, absolutely, it's related. |
No you didn't correctly understand my request: I already used But the latest release of K6s operator (v0.0.18) doesn't work! There is the The workaround is to remove v0.0.18 and use the v0.0.17: |
@jeromeguillaume, that's very strange: v0.0.18 contains both How are you installing / upgrading k6-operator? |
The v0.0.19 release is the first one that contains this change fully: bundle, Helm chart and |
In order to improve readability of our interfaces, we should rename the K6 CRD from:
To:
Why?
kind: K6
is not very descriptive as from the first glance, it might mean a lot of things. If we add new CRDs (see #191), we should try to remove the confusing names as well.This is a breaking change for existing setups so consider supporting both names for some period of time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: