Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOCS] Community/issues board mentions #10548

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

molliemarie
Copy link
Contributor

  • added references to issues board in Get Support doc
  • added references to issues board in community resources doc
  • removed mention of the GX-supported label from contributing doc, since the decision was made not to use that label.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e4aaa35
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/67180e0361186800086bd834
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10548.docs.greatexpectations.io
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.21%. Comparing base (2551f13) to head (e4aaa35).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #10548   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    80.21%   80.21%           
========================================
  Files          461      461           
  Lines        40004    40004           
========================================
+ Hits         32090    32091    +1     
+ Misses        7914     7913    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 67.85% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
3.10 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.10 aws_deps ?
3.10 big ?
3.10 clickhouse ?
3.10 filesystem ?
3.10 mssql ?
3.10 mysql ?
3.10 postgresql ?
3.10 spark_connect ?
3.10 trino ?
3.11 67.85% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
3.11 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.11 aws_deps ?
3.11 big ?
3.11 clickhouse ?
3.11 filesystem ?
3.11 mssql ?
3.11 mysql ?
3.11 postgresql ?
3.11 spark_connect ?
3.11 trino ?
3.12 67.85% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
3.12 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 55.27% <ø> (ø)
3.12 aws_deps 46.02% <ø> (ø)
3.12 big 54.65% <ø> (ø)
3.12 databricks 47.76% <ø> (ø)
3.12 filesystem 61.57% <ø> (ø)
3.12 mssql 50.12% <ø> (ø)
3.12 mysql 50.19% <ø> (ø)
3.12 postgresql 54.47% <ø> (ø)
3.12 snowflake 48.61% <ø> (ø)
3.12 spark 57.95% <ø> (ø)
3.12 spark_connect 46.32% <ø> (ø)
3.12 trino 52.56% <ø> (ø)
3.9 67.87% <ø> (ø)
3.9 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 55.28% <ø> (ø)
3.9 aws_deps 46.04% <ø> (ø)
3.9 big 54.66% <ø> (ø)
3.9 clickhouse 42.89% <ø> (ø)
3.9 databricks 47.77% <ø> (ø)
3.9 filesystem 61.58% <ø> (ø)
3.9 mssql 50.11% <ø> (ø)
3.9 mysql 50.17% <ø> (ø)
3.9 postgresql 54.45% <ø> (ø)
3.9 snowflake 48.63% <ø> (ø)
3.9 spark 57.91% <ø> (ø)
3.9 spark_connect 46.33% <ø> (ø)
3.9 trino 52.54% <ø> (ø)
cloud 0.00% <ø> (ø)
docs-basic 52.62% <ø> (ø)
docs-creds-needed 52.85% <ø> (ø)
docs-spark 52.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@klavavej klavavej left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

couple small suggestions to improve clarity, but nothing blocking

- `community-supported`: related to a part of the code-base that is not tested and actively maintained with new GX Core or GX Cloud releases; however, we actively welcome ongoing maintenance from the community
- `not-supported`: an issue that we at GX will not be maintaining, and we will not support PRs or contributions from the community on the topic

Issues without either a `community-supported` or `not-supported` label can be assumed to be **GX-supported**, which means they are related to a part of the code-base that is tested and actively maintained with new GX Core or GX Cloud releases.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is likely already in your plans but just in case it's not, I suggest removing the old gx-supported label from GitHub to reduce the risk of confusion about whether or not that label is used.

Screenshot 2024-10-22 at 11 50 58 AM

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good thinking. I'll do that now. :)

@molliemarie molliemarie added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 22, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 4010f52 Oct 22, 2024
64 checks passed
@molliemarie molliemarie deleted the community/issues_board_mentions branch October 22, 2024 22:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants