Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide more information when viewing previously adopted trees #11

Open
kenwebb opened this issue Dec 20, 2012 · 1 comment
Open

Provide more information when viewing previously adopted trees #11

kenwebb opened this issue Dec 20, 2012 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@kenwebb
Copy link
Owner

kenwebb commented Dec 20, 2012

"When you are offered the tree to adopt, it provides information on the kind of tree and the diameter in the box, but then once you've adopted it that information is no longer available. So we'd want to include that information in the automatic follow-up and we'd want to find a way to keep it visible after someone takes the plunge."

"My understanding is that the trees will be a certain colour if they have been adopted (red?) and if they are available for adoption, they will just turn up a different colour (green?)… perhaps it would be useful for the adopt-a-tree website to describe what the different colours mean (green means go/adopt; red means stop/already adopted).

I agree, once someone ‘adopts’ a tree we will need to set something up so they receive an initial follow-up e-mail with some instructions, and ideally the database of people doing the adopting will be easily accessible and transferable to NationBuilder, perhaps as a spreadsheet of data, or something."

@ghost ghost assigned kenwebb Feb 18, 2013
kenwebb added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2013
@kenwebb
Copy link
Owner Author

kenwebb commented Feb 18, 2013

Provided information about the tree after it's adopted. Edited users/thank_you.html.haml .
There are still other aspects of this issue that are not yet addressed,
so the issue needs to stay open.

kenwebb added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant