Skip to content

Comments

docs: Add multiplexing page#22426

Merged
ritchie46 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
multiplex
Apr 26, 2025
Merged

docs: Add multiplexing page#22426
ritchie46 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
multiplex

Conversation

@ritchie46
Copy link
Member

closes #22423

@ritchie46 ritchie46 requested a review from c-peters as a code owner April 26, 2025 10:56
@github-actions github-actions bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars labels Apr 26, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.01%. Comparing base (79177fc) to head (7efc48d).
Report is 41 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #22426      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.07%   81.01%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        1635     1643       +8     
  Lines      233311   231769    -1542     
  Branches     2719     2721       +2     
==========================================
- Hits       189150   187779    -1371     
+ Misses      43518    43347     -171     
  Partials      643      643              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ritchie46 ritchie46 merged commit 0f39739 into main Apr 26, 2025
12 checks passed
@ritchie46 ritchie46 deleted the multiplex branch April 26, 2025 18:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using LazyFrame.unique and LazyFrame.slice results in missing data

1 participant