Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support Multitenancy #455

Open
alexanderkiel opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Support Multitenancy #455

alexanderkiel opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@alexanderkiel
Labels
discussion Issues which are not decided yet. epic A large body of work that can be broken down into a number of smaller issues.

Comments

@alexanderkiel
Copy link
Member

We like to support the use-case were multiple tenants store their data into one Blaze instance but like to access it separately.

We need:

  • authentication - we already have OpenID Connect but some machine-to-machine authentication would be useful
  • a way to assign resources to tenants - could be done by using Meta.source
  • a way to filter the database value by tenant - could be done by using Meta.source
@alexanderkiel alexanderkiel added discussion Issues which are not decided yet. enhancement New feature or request labels Aug 19, 2021
@alexanderkiel alexanderkiel self-assigned this Aug 19, 2021
@alexanderkiel alexanderkiel modified the milestone: v0.12 Aug 19, 2021
@kaustubhkfold
Copy link

Hi @alexanderkiel, was this request completed and merged?

@alexanderkiel alexanderkiel added epic A large body of work that can be broken down into a number of smaller issues. and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Nov 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@alexanderkiel alexanderkiel

Labels
discussion Issues which are not decided yet. epic A large body of work that can be broken down into a number of smaller issues.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@alexanderkiel @kaustubhkfold