Do participants lie to UX researchers? Well, Debbie Levitt 🐦🔥 has a perspective. Check out the latest BlatzChatz (Youtube) interview piece where Debbie talks about understanding user needs beyond just research validation. https://lnkd.in/eAt_rbbt
BlatzChatz (Youtube)’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
🌈 If you're interested in understanding biases in UX research, check out this insightful article from Maze on overcoming cognitive bias in user research. It's a great read for anyone looking to improve their research methods! 👇 https://lnkd.in/ddaar-nk
-
You can now read "How inclusive design shaped me" on UX Collective. Does this mean that I'll be writing more this year? Maybe! 💌 Read: https://lnkd.in/dejMh5t2 #inclusivedesign #neurodiversityatwork #uxdesign
-
-
Fractional Research & Strategy Leader | Consumer Cultural Experience Leader | Senior UX International Research | Multilingual | AI Enthusiast
Do you want to be part of a candid conversation about what’s happening in UX Research? This information will be used to investigate what is happening in User Experience Research, including gaps in tools, processes, and learning opportunities. The results will be published in a public report. We are a group of three curious researchers: Peggy Szymanski, Alberto Edery, and myself. Here is the link for a very quick survey: https://lnkd.in/gxYmFsUy We’d love to hear your thoughts! #uxresearch #userexperience #strategy #research #uxresearch_by_researcher
-
The critical ways UX research studies can go wrong: 1) flawed research plans, 2) misinterpreted findings, and 3) failures in generalization. Keeping these in mind reminds us of the importance of maintaining sound methodologies, vigilant analysis, and considering real-world contexts to ensure the value of our work in informing decisions. https://lnkd.in/eimgbgCr
-
Senior Product Designer | Senior UX/UI Designer | Design System | Data-driven | Gamification Strategist
In research studies, the distinction between open-ended and closed questions plays a crucial role. Open-ended questions, facilitating free-form text answers, encourage exploration and reasoned responses. Examples include inquiries about daily routines or feelings toward a task. Closed questions, on the other hand, restrict responses to a limited set of options, providing concise and specific information. Even seemingly open-ended questions in UX, such as asking about website usage frequency, are treated as closed due to practical considerations. Recognizing when to use each type of question is essential for effective user interviews and usability tests. Closed questions excel in obtaining clear, clarifying responses, while open-ended questions prompt users to share detailed experiences, enriching research insights. The nuanced application of these question types is instrumental in tailoring research methodologies for comprehensive and relevant data collection. https://lnkd.in/duiUWV-Q #research #ux
-
-
Get the secrets to boosting your UX research program, including tactical tips for: 1. Engaging with real users for higher quality results 2. Executing mixed-method research across the design and development cycle 3. Aligning goals and timing with stakeholders 4. Incorporating AI as your UX research assistant Download the Essential Guide to UX Research: https://hubs.la/Q02RdJSN0
-
-
Card sorting is a classic UX research method. It helps us understand how users naturally categorize information. This information can aid in creating a product's information architecture (IA) that matches users' mental models. Learn more in our video: https://lnkd.in/eaNEnE8y #userresearch #uxresearch #cardsorting
Card Sorting: Why & When (Video)
nngroup.com
-
What do you wish you knew at the start of your UX journey? Recently, I asked our community to chime in on one thing they wish they knew at the start of their design journey. Here's my answer - and an even better answer from Justine: -- 💡 Learning UX is better with friends - join our free community to access design challenges, mini-lessons, UX workshops, and the support you need to take the next steps in UX. 👉 Join here: https://lnkd.in/e4_bZpsU
-
Lead UX Researcher / NNg certified. Specializing in mixed-methods qualitative research and strategic insights.
The first rule about UX…
"We have long argued that UX without user research isn’t UX. But, we did not anticipate that people would attempt to conduct user research without real users. We need to rephrase our slogan: UX without real-user research isn’t UX." My brilliant colleagues Maria Rosala and Kate Moran comment on synthetic users and if/when to use AI-generated “research.” 🔥 ▶ Real-user research is essential. Synthetic users cannot replace the depth and empathy gained from studying and speaking with real people. They often provide shallow or overly favorable feedback. ▶ Supplement, don’t substitute. If you’re using synthetic users in your research process, they should complement, not replace, real research. ▶ Use synthetic research for specific purposes. Synthetic users are useful for desk research and generating hypotheses, but not for final decision-making. Read the full article on Nielsen Norman Group: https://lnkd.in/e_g4Vzcg #ai #userresearch #uxresearch #syntheticusers
-