简体 More
財團法人 國家政策研究基金會 www.npf.org.tw
國政基金會
財團法人 國家政策研究基金會
Don’t be mad, please

Don’t be mad, please

國政評論 國安

作者: 洪健昭 ( 2009年10月30日 11:28)
關鍵字:DPP Taiwan-US beef protocol bovine spongiform encephalopat

%
熱門指數
分享

Democratic Progressive Party leaders are up in arms against the administration for signing a protocol of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)-related measures for the importation of beef and beef products for human consumption from the territory of the authorities represented by the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT).Now let’s forget about those high-sounding words about the imports.Simply put, the agreement signed on last Thursday is about Taiwan’s purchase of beef and beef products from the United States that may – less than once in a blue moon -- cause deadly mad cow disease.

Not just the opposition but quite a number of the ruling Kuomintang are against the agreement, charging the Department of Health and the Council of Agriculture with concluding an unequal treaty, like the ones the Great Qing (Manchu) Empire was compelled to ink at the end of the Opium War of 1839 and thereafter.Even Mayor of Taipei Hau Lung-bin registered his strong objection to the importation of risky beef and beef products. They are all overreacting, however.

For one thing, the protocol isn’t an unequal treaty.It wasn’t forced upon Taiwan by the American Institute in Taiwan.The representative of the MoD negotiated with her American counterpart on an equal footing.

Of course, opponents may pick faults, accusing her of failing to protect Taiwan’s public health against an onslaught of mad cow disease.But the fact is that there won’t be any BSE invasion.Specified risk materials are placed under special control.They include the distal ileum of the small intestine, the tonsils from cattle of all ages, the brain, skull, eyes, trigeminal ganglia, spinal cord, vertebral column, and dorsal root ganglia from cattle 30 months of age and older.Offal is a common word for those specified risk materials.

That means the offal can be rejected on import, if some beef dealers really want to buy it from the United States.As a matter of fact, very few, if any, dealers want to import such beef products even from Australia at much lower prices, for the simple reason that Chinese on Taiwan have little taste for them.Have you ever heard of any restaurant in Taipei offering eyes or spinal cords of an ox as a dish to attract clients?

There’s no 100 percent guarantee that other less risky beef and beef products won’t victimize a gourmet or gastronome.But one has to know that most of the Han Chinese on Taiwan prefer pork to beef, for they believe oxen used to do heavy work in tilling land and therefore shouldn’t be slaughtered for their meat.Buddhists – most of the people here think they are – believe in ahimsa, which prohibits killing of any sentient beings, including cattle, swine and poultry.In other words, a very small minority of our people would take the risk of eating beef and beef products that pose any BSE threat.

That’s why Chen Wu-hsiung, chairman of the Council of Agriculture, told lawmakers yesterday he would gladly and happily eat any imported risky American beef and beef products.He put his family on the line, too.His family members would, just like him, eat such products, he promised.But he made a gaffe.He said he doesn’t advise people to eat them.There is no reason why he should say so.People who do not like to eat beef know what to do without being given any admonition.

We wish to call on our public health-conscious legislators not to worry.Their taking the administration to task is already more than enough warning to even “beef-eaters” – not the yeomen of the Tower of London – not to risk a one-in-a-million chance to get mad cow disease by going to chic steak houses to order a fat T-bone steak for a dinner.

One thing all opponents to the protocol have to keep in mind is that it has already been signed.If it is regarded as an agreement or treaty, the lawmakers may refuse to ratify it.Well, that’s the power the Constitution gives them.If not, they may legislate some countermeasures to make sure no one will get mad cow disease. We do not want them to force the administration to renegotiate a new protocol, albeit we believe they don’t have that in mind.

On the other hand, we are certain that the opposition is opposing for opposition’s sake.Democratic Progressive Party leaders, from its chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen on down, are more than happy to seize what they believe is a golden opportunity to embarrass President Ma Ying-jeou.Had the protocol been signed while President Chen Shui-bian was in office, no one in the now opposition would have raised any objection.Remember Chen has recently self-styled himself as an agent of the U.S. military government on Taiwan who had to take orders from the AIT in Taiwan?

Please also remember what the United States has done for keeping Taiwan as it is now.Without its help, there’s no Republic of China on Taiwan.There would never have been any economic takeoff that created many a steak lover in the first place.The United States is the only country in the world that may come to our help if and when hostilities break out across the Taiwan Street.Taiwan owes Uncle Sam so much that it must accept the benign protocol which its opponents describe as a treaty that humiliates the country.

(本文刊載於98.10.27 The China Post 8版,本文代表作者個人意見)

%
熱門指數
分享 列印
13

文章表情 (你對這則文章的感覺)

回應意見
更多相關文章
國政評論 內政

DPP的權力DDT
彭蕙仙 ( 2016年12月12日 13:40 )

立法院上個會期審查《不當黨產條例》時,國民黨立法院黨團喊出了「今天清黨產、明天清家產」的口號,當時外界理解的人可能不多,不當黨產委員會的主任委員顧立雄還譏諷是 ...

國政評論 國安

Tsai can’t debate Ma about truth of ’selling out’ Taiwan
洪健昭 ( 2011年10月7日 13:58 )

To debate or not to debate: that's not a question for Tsai Ing-wen, chairwoman of the Democratic Progressive Party who is running for president. For President ...

國政評論 國安

Ultranationalism is harmful
洪健昭 ( 2008年12月29日 12:31 )

Ultranationalism is rather a relatively unfamiliar word. It was coined by historians to describe the movement in prewar Japan in response to its rapid Westerni ...

國政評論 國安

A protest march
洪健昭 ( 2008年10月27日 15:33 )

Half a million people took to the streets in Taipei on Saturday to demand that President Ma Ying-jeou and Premier Liu Chao-shiuan step down. It’s the str ...

國政評論 國安

What’s in store after next Saturday
洪健昭 ( 2008年1月11日 17:18 )

Voters will go to the polls next Saturday to elect a new Legislative Yuan. This year’s legislative elections, however, may yet prove to be very much trou ...

國政評論 國安

What a gunslinger does at a poker game
洪健昭 ( 2007年12月13日 17:31 )

Stroll a Taipei shopping district, and you’ll get flyers by the dozens forced into your hands by part-timers. All they want is to get you into their stor ...

訪客最新推薦文章
永續

二氧化碳產生量如何計算
胡思聰 ( 2007年6月12日 09:50 )

6月5日是環境日,許多環境保護的課題廣受各界關注。近來地球暖化的議題甚囂塵上,因此有關二氧化碳減量的問題特別受到重視。國內某環境文 ...

科經

惠台31條措施的牛肉上桌了
林祖嘉 ( 2018年4月17日 16:11 )

就在10日博鰲論壇蕭習會的同一天,廈門市公布了31條惠台措施的60條配套細則。在蕭習會上,前副總統蕭萬長向大陸國家主席習近平表示,希望 ...

社會

嚴肅看待單親家庭之於量質俱變的時代變...
王順民 ( 12月6日 16:45 )

一則關乎到單親家庭之量、質俱變的議題現象,實有其嚴肅看待之必要。 資料顯示:台灣地區每十戶就有一戶係為單親家庭,合計共有93萬戶 ...

訪客最新表情文章
科經

台灣及國際的醜態
吳文希 ( 2024年4月1日 16:00 )

前言 最近一段日子裡,臺灣境內發生好多不平常、不平靜的事件,諸如蘇丹紅污染的食安問題、金廈海域船難事件、桃園機場塞機亂象等,由此 ...

憲政

國民黨與民進黨憲政立場之比較
憲政法制組 ( 2007年3月7日 17:34 )

國民黨與民進黨在憲政立場上,有諸多不同之主張,本文將從國家認同、憲法架構、政府體制、憲政運作、責任政治、立委選舉制度、人事同意權 ...

教文

領袖的同理心
張瑞雄 ( 2022年9月1日 08:18 )

二○○九年八月,莫拉克颱風來襲,總統赴台東勘災,路上一對母子半路向總統陳情,「為什麼我們把票投給你,需要見到你時都見不到!」不料總 ...

空氣品質指標
名家觀點
  • ( 12月6日 16:58)
    陸委會主委邱垂正上個月12日在一場研討會上提出,「接受九二共識即等於承認台灣是中華人民共和國一部分」的論調;而本月21日海基會副董事長羅文嘉接受電台訪問時又再說道:「接受九 ...
  • ( 12月6日 16:58)
    激烈的美國大選終於結束,大家重新回到本身關注的問題上面,然而由於川普選上,而他的許多行為與政策難以預料,因此現在仍然有非常多的國家和個人必需針對川普未來可能的政策進行分 ...
  • ( 12月6日 16:56)
    日前傳出,剛剛在加拿大結束的CPTPP執委會會議中,台灣想要在這一次會議中能成立針對台灣入會的工作小組,再次沒能成功。本來我們政府部門宣稱加拿大與台灣關係良好,這一次由加拿大 ...
  • ( 12月6日 16:54)
    日前,美國總統當選人川普宣布說,他就任就一件事就是要簽署對加拿大和墨西哥進口商品課徵25%的關稅,對中國大陸進口的商品則課徵10%的關稅。結果墨西哥總統立即回應說,如果美國對 ...
  • ( 2024年11月13日 09:13)
    國發會每兩年的人口推計公布了,有一些關於台灣的未來值得大家關切。一、二○二八年將脫離人口紅利,也就是工作年齡人口(十五至六十四歲)占比低於總人口三分之二,扶養比將高於○點 ...
  • ( 2024年11月13日 09:13)
    最近有立委關心全民健保的財務問題並舉行公聽會,會中有學者發言「最花健保費費用的老年人,在健保的貢獻反而最小。」並建議健保財源結構應增加資本利得的徵收。有類似想法者並不少 ...
臉書粉絲專頁
財團法人 國家政策研究基金會 www.npf.org.tw

TOP