This document provides a rubric for evaluating Glogster projects on various criteria including:
- Originality, from 10 (highly creative and inventive ideas) to 5 or lower (relies heavily on others' ideas with little original thinking)
- Attractiveness of visual design, from excellent to good to distracting use of fonts, colors, and graphics
- Depth and accuracy of content, from in-depth coverage with excellent knowledge to minimal or factually incorrect content
- Organization of content, from clear headings and lists to flawed or no logical structure
- Grammar and spelling, from no errors to some errors to many errors
- Fair division of work among group members, from
This document provides a rubric for evaluating Glogster projects on various criteria including:
- Originality, from 10 (highly creative and inventive ideas) to 5 or lower (relies heavily on others' ideas with little original thinking)
- Attractiveness of visual design, from excellent to good to distracting use of fonts, colors, and graphics
- Depth and accuracy of content, from in-depth coverage with excellent knowledge to minimal or factually incorrect content
- Organization of content, from clear headings and lists to flawed or no logical structure
- Grammar and spelling, from no errors to some errors to many errors
- Fair division of work among group members, from
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 1
USING GLOGSTER
CATEGORY
10 Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.
8 Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.
6-5
>5
Originality
Uses other people\'s ideas, but there is Uses other people\'s little evidence of ideas. original thinking. Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally removes interest from the presentation content. Includes essential information about the topic but there are some content errors.
Attractiveness
Makes excellent use Makes good use of of font, color, font, color, graphics, graphics, effects, effects, etc. to do etc. to do more more attractive the attractive the presentation. presentation. Covers topic indepth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentation content.
Content
Content is minimal OR there are several content errors.
Organization
Uses headings or Content is well bulleted lists to organized using organize, but the headings or bulleted overall organization lists to group related of topics appears material. flawed. Few or fewer misspellings and/or grammatical errors. (3-4) The work is divided and shared fairly by all group members, though work may vary from person to person.
Content is logically organized for the most part.
There was no clear or logical organizational structure.
Structures
No misspellings or grammatical errors.
Some misspellings and/or grammatical errors.(5-6) The work was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work.
Alot of errors in spelling or grammar. (more than 6) The work was not divided OR several people in the group are viewed as not doing their fair share of the work.
Teamwork
The work is divided and shared equally by all group members.
