TMP BF52
TMP BF52
www.elsevier.com/locate/polydegstab
Abstract
The main shortcomings of biodegradable starch/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) film are hydrophilicity and poor mechanical
properties. With an aim to overcome these disadvantages, cornstarch was methylated and blend films were prepared by mixing
methylated-cornstarch (MCS) with PVA. The mechanical properties, water resistance and biodegradability of the MCS/PVA film
were investigated. It was found that MCS/PVA film had higher water resistance than the native starch/PVA film. However,
the water resistance of MCS/PVA films did not have significant difference with the increase in the degree of substitution (DS) of the
methylated starch from 0.096 to 0.864. Enzymatic, microbiological and soil burial biodegradation results indicated that
the biodegradability of the MCS/PVA film strongly depended on the starch proportion in the film matrix. The degradation rate of
starch in the starch/PVA film was hindered by blending starch with PVA. Both tensile strength and percent elongation at break of
the MCS/PVA film were improved as DS of the methylated starch increased. Conversely, increasing the methylated starch
proportion in film matrix deteriorated both tensile strength and percent elongation at break of the film.
Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Methylated-cornstarch (MCS); Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA); Mechanical properties; Water resistance; Biodegradability
0141-3910/$ - see front matter Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.06.008
704 Z. Guohua et al. / Polymer Degradation and Stability 91 (2006) 703e711
bonds [6]. However, its water solubility is related to its 2.2. Preparation of methylated-cornstarch
degree of hydrolysis, molecular weight, and the modi-
fication while blending with other processing additives Cornstarch was methylated by dispersing starch
[11], with a maximum value at the degree of hydrolysis granules in an aqueous suspension at pH 10 and using
of 88% [12]. From the cost and practicality points, it is dimethyl sulfate as methylating reagent. After modifi-
preferable that the blend contains as much starch as cation, the reaction mixture was neutralized, dialyzed
possible. However, the properties of the blend films and dried. Samples with different DS values were
deteriorated as starch proportion in the film formulation obtained by varying the reaction parameters (Table 1).
increased. This might result from a poor compatibility
between starch and PVA [13] and phase separation 2.3. Degree of substitution
during film preparation [14]. Moreover, the water
resistance of the native starch/PVA film deteriorated DS indicates the average number of substituted
compared to that of the PVA film. groups (methyl) per anhydroglucose unit in methylated
The techniques for increasing the compatibility starch. Since three free hydroxyl groups are available in
between starch and synthetic polymers include adding each anhydroglucose unit of native starch, the maximum
a compatibiliser to the blends [15], chemical modifica- DS is 3. DS values were determined by the Morgane
tions of the synthetic polymers [1,16] and starch. They Zeisel method [23]. The MorganeZeisel assay was based
have been proved as effective measures to improve the on ether-cleavage by hydrogen iodide resulting in the
properties of film. A number of methods are available in formation of iodomethane, which was led by a nitrogen
starch modification including esterification, oxidation, flow into a trap solution of Ag(I)eethanol to form Ag(I)
etherification and cross-linking [2,4,7,8,10,17e19]. Of solid. Dried methylated starch (25 mg) and 0.5 ml of
these methods, methylation, as one etherification phenol were added into a conical flask, followed by the
method, was used widely in elucidating the structure addition of 0.2 ml of propionic anhydride (AR grade) in
of polysaccharides and the substitution pattern in a drop-wise manner. After the starch was dispersed fully,
polymer chains [20e23]. Theoretically, methylation is the flask was cooled in an ice bath, and 5 ml of hydrogen
an effective way to increase the hydrophobicity of the iodide was added. Dried nitrogen was introduced into
starch and to improve the compatibility between starch the solution through the needle with a rate of 60e70
and PVA (hydrolysis degree 99.5%). However, no bubbles per minute. The flask was heated to 90 C for 2 h
information was available on the methylated starch- to completely convert the methyl group to iodomethane.
based film. Therefore, the objective of this work was to The resulting iodomethane was driven out of the flask
methylate starch and to prepare blend film by mixing and absorbed by 0.05 M AgNO3ealcohol solution to
methylated starch with PVA. Water absorption capacity, give an Ag(I) solid. A reflux-condenser also was used to
mechanical properties and biodegradability of the prevent the loss of iodomethane. The DS values were
blended films were evaluated. calculated on the weight basis of the Ag(I) produced.
2.5. Film preparation temperature up to the equilibrium (24 h). Each specimen
was taken off from the container, removed the surface
The films were prepared by a casting method. Firstly, water by adsorbing with filter paper, and then weighed.
PVA and starch hot water solutions were prepared and The result of each sample represents the average of
were mixed in a flask with a stirrer and a thermometer. three tests. The water absorption capacity (WAC) was
The flask was placed in a water bath at a temperature of calculated as:
85 C, and the mixture was vigorously stirred for 8 h.
The pH of the gel-like mixture was adjusted to 2e3 by WAC%ZðWA WI Þ=WI !100
the addition of phosphoric acid. After that, glycerine
was added as a plasticiser at a concentration of 10% where WA is the weight of the specimen at the adsorbing
(v/w, on dry basis of the weight of starch and PVA) equilibrium and WI is the initial dry weight of the
[24]. Following, formaldehyde was added as a hydroxyl specimen.
cross-linking reagent at a concentration of 1% (v/w, on
dry basis of the weight of starch and PVA) [25], and the 2.9. Enzymatic degradation test
resulting mixture was stirred further for 0.5 h. Ammonia
was added to neutralize the pH of the mixtures. After The enzymatic reaction mixture, comprising 1 ml of
being degassed under vacuum, the warm mixture was a-amylase solution, 4 ml of b-amylase solution and
cast on framed glass plates, and then dried at 65 C for 95 ml of distilled water, was placed in the clean conical
5 h. Starch and PVA films were also prepared in the flasks. The dried samples were cut into 4 ! 4 cm square
same way and used as control. specimens, weighed, and immersed in the conical flasks.
The flasks were placed in a shaking incubator with a rate
2.6. Mechanical properties tests of 120 rpm for 36 h at 30 C. The samples were removed
and rinsed with distilled water to remove the enzyme,
Tensile strength and percent elongation at break were and dried in a desiccator under vacuum for 24 h before
determined as mechanical indexes of the film in a controlled they were weighed. The degree of enzymatic degradation
environment (25 C, 55% relative humidity). All of the (DED) was calculated as:
tested film sheets, equilibrated to 50% relative humidity for
at least 48 h at 25 C prior to testing, were cut into strips DED%ZðWI WH Þ=WI !100
(15 ! 150 mm). Tensile strength and percent elongation at
break were measured by using XLW(G)-PC intelligent where WH is the dry weight of the specimen after
electronic tensile tester (Languang, Tsinan, China) with enzymatic treatment and WI is the initial dry weight of
a crosshead speed of 30 mm/min and an initial gauge the specimen.
length of 100 mm. Film thickness was measured with
a micrometer calliper. Tensile strength and percent 2.10. Microbiological degradation test
elongation at break of each sample were averaged from
five tests. The specimens were stored under controlled Two bacteria (B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa), two
temperature and conditions prior to testing. fungi (A. oryzae and A. niger) and a soil suspension were
used. Nutrient salt agar was prepared by dissolving
2.7. Morphology analysis potassium dihydrogen phosphate (0.700 g), magnesium
sulfate (0.700 g), ammonium nitrate (1.000 g), sodium
The surface morphology of the films, before and after chloride (0.005 g), ferrous sulfate (0.002 g), manganese
biodegradation, was investigated with a camera-linked sulfate (0.001 g) and agar (15.000 g) in 1 L of distilled
light microscope (BHA-1, Olympus) or a scanning water. After the medium was sterilized at 121 C for
electron microscope (SEM) (AMRAV, USA) operating 25 min, its pH was adjusted in the range of 6.5e7.0 by
at 10 kV. The SEM samples were coated with a 50-mm the addition of sterilized 0.1 M NaOH. The hot pulpy
thick gold film in an automatic sputter coater, prior to mixture was poured into sterilized petri dishes having
testing to make the sample conductive. a 5 mm thick agar layer. The microorganism suspension
or soil suspension was sprayed on the surface of the
2.8. Water absorption test medium, and the xerothermically sterilized specimens
were placed tightly on the surface of the agar layer. The
The water absorption capacity of the films was petri dishes were incubated at 30 C for 14 days. The
measured with a plastic sheet of 30 ! 30 mm. The rate of microorganism growth was assessed visually at
specimens first were dried in a vacuum oven at 50 C for the end of the test. The recorded parameter (S ) is
24 h, and then cooled in a desiccator and immediately the area fraction of the specimen’s surface covered
weighed. The conditioned specimens were fully immersed by macroscopic colonies [S ! 5% (0, nil growth),
in a container filled with distilled water at room 5 % S! 25% (C, sparse growth), 25 % S ! 50%
706 Z. Guohua et al. / Polymer Degradation and Stability 91 (2006) 703e711
(CC, medium growth), S R 50% (CCC, abundant et al. [22], while it distinguished from the results of
growth)]. The surface morphologies of the specimens, Mischnick and K} uhn [20] and van der Burgt et al. [23].
before and after microorganism treatment, were re- Besides the reaction condition, other factors, such as
corded using a camera-linked light microscope. starch composition (amylose/amylopectin) and starch
crystalline structure (amorphous/crystalline) possibly
2.11. Soil burial degradation test led to this difference.
1.810
1.5 3430.08
1.0
A
b
2929.97 1454.22
0.5
0.000
4000 3000 2000 1000 450
cm-1
Fig. 1. FT-IR spectra of the native cornstarch (a) and MCS with a DS of 0.275 (b).
water absorption of the mixture was retarded by mixing blending native starch and PVA [14], no phase
MCS with PVA. On the other hand, the amount of separation was observed in the present study, indicating
starch in the film did not noticeably affect the water a good compatibility between modified starch and PVA,
absorption capacity of the MCS/PVA film. A dramatic which improved the tear-resistance and stretch of the
decrease in the mechanical properties of the film was blend films. The tensile strength significantly increased
observed after water absorption. as DS of methylated starch increased from 0.096 to
0.275, while the increase became less obvious with
further increasing DS from 0.275 to 0.864.
3.4. Mechanical properties As far as the starch proportions in the blends were
concerned, it was found that percent elongation at break
Mechanical properties of MCS/PVA films and native continuously decreased as the amounts of starch in the
starch/PVA films are shown in Figs. 4 and 5. Tensile matrix increased and a sharp decrease was observed in
strength and percent elongation at break represent the tensile strength when the starch percentage increased
force per unit area required to tear the film and the from 0 to 35%. However, the tensile strength did not
ability of the film to stretch [17]. Both tensile strength change significantly with the starch proportion further
and percent elongation at break of MCS/PVA films increasing from 35 to 100% (Fig. 5). Similar findings
increased continuously as DS increased, and they are were reported by Wu [1] and Ishiaku et al. [5] regarding
noticeably higher than those of their unmodified mechanical properties of polycaprolactone/starch com-
counterparts (Fig. 4). Unlike the reported fact that posites.
phase separation occurred during film preparation by
350 350
300 300
250 250
WAA/%
WAA/%
200 200
150 150
100 100
50 50
0 0
0 0.096 0.275 0.581 0.864 0 35 50 65 80 100
DS of methylated starch Starch percentage in film matrix
Fig. 2. Effects of DS on the water absorption capacity of the MSC/ Fig. 3. Effects of starch proportion in film matrix on the water
PVA films [MCS/PVA (w/w): 50/50.]. absorption capacity of the MSC/PVA films (MSC with a DS of 0.275.).
708 Z. Guohua et al. / Polymer Degradation and Stability 91 (2006) 703e711
13.5 165 95
13.3
Tensile strength/MPa
75
Percent elongation
160
13.1 55
DED/
12.9 155 35
12.7 15
150
12.5 -5
0 3 6 18 36
12.3 145 Enzyme treatment time/h
0 0.096 0.275 0.581 0.864
DS of methylated starch Fig. 6. Enzymatic degradability of the native starch film (-), the
MSC/PVA film (C) [MCS/PVA (w/w): 50/50; MSC with a DS of
Fig. 4. Effects of DS on the tensile strength (C) and percent elongation 0.275] and the PVA film (:).
at break (-) of the MSC/PVA films [MCS/PVA (w/w): 50/50].
Percent elongation
Table 2 100
Microorganism growth on the surface of the films after 14 days
Degradation/%
incubation at 30 C 75
Microorganism or Microorganism growth efficiency
its origin 50
Starch filma MCS/PVA filmb PVA film
B. subtilis CCCc CCC 0 25
P. aeruginosa CC C 0
A. oryzae CCC CCC 0 0
A. niger 0
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
5
0
5
0
5
0
CCC CCC
10
12
13
15
16
18
Soil suspension CCC CCC C Test time/day
a
Made out of the native cornstarch.
b
MCS/PVA (by weight): 50/50; DS of MSC: 0.275. Fig. 8. Degradability of the native starch film (-), the MSC/PVA film
c
CCC, Abundant growth; CC, medium growth; C, sparse (C) [MCS/PVA (w/w): 50/50; MSC with a DS of 0.275.] and the PVA
growth; 0, nil growth. film (:) in the soil burial test.
The soil burial test is an outdoor experiment, and that a two-stage degradation took place in soil burial
provides a realistic environment where soil humidity, test: (a) the diffusion of the water into the film samples
temperature and type and amount of microorganisms resulted in the swelling of the films and allowed the
are in less control and change with season. All the tested growth of microorganism on the film; (b) enzymatic and
specimens had the same shape and size to avoid the other secreted degradation caused a weight loss and
effects of the film’s shape on its biodegradability [3]. disruption of the film samples. In addition, as both
Biodegradability of the samples was studied by evalu- starch and PVA had overall hydrophilic properties,
ating weight loss of the films over time (Fig. 8). The dissolution of MCS, PVA and their partially degraded
starch film degraded rapidly in the initial 15 days, and products would be another factor causing the weight
complete degradation was obtained after 60 days. For loss of the film. Under the soil environment, the
the MCS/PVA film, a rapid degradation occurred in the mechanical properties of films, such as tensile strength
initial 45 days, followed by a slow degradation until the and percent elongation at break, also deteriorated. An
end of the experiment. In contrast, the PVA film exhibited almost homogeneous surface of the MCS/PVA film
a higher resistance against soil burial biodegradation. before soil burial test broke up after the treatment,
Together with literature on this point, it was proposed indicating a biodegradation of the film [34] (Fig. 9).
Fig. 7. Microbiological degradation of the MCS/PVA films [MCS/PVA (w/w): 50/50; MSC with a DS of 0.275.] recorded with camera-linked light
microscope (400! magnification). (a) Control; (b) Bacillus subtilis; (c) Pseudomonas aeruginosa; (d) Aspergillus oryzae; (e) Aspergillus niger; (f) soil
suspension.
710 Z. Guohua et al. / Polymer Degradation and Stability 91 (2006) 703e711
Fig. 9. The surface SEM pictures (1000! magnification) of the MCS/PVA films [MCS/PVA (w/w): 50/50; MSC with a DS of 0.275.]. (a) Before the
soil burial degradation test; (b): after the soil burial degradation test.
[16] Bikiaris D, Panayiotou C. LDPE/starch blends compatibilised [26] Kim D-H, Na S-K, Park J-S. Preparation and characterization of
with PE-g-MA copolymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science modified starch-based plastic film reinforced with short pulp fiber.
1998;70:1503e21. I. Structural properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science
[17] Kim M, Lee S-J. Characteristics of crosslinked potato starch and 2003;88:2100e7.
starch-filled linear low-density polyethylene films. Carbohydrate [27] Arajúo MA, Cunha AM, Mota M. Enzymatic degradation of
Polymers 2002;50:331e7. starch-based thermoplastic compounds used in protheses: identi-
[18] Xu YX, Miladinov V, Hanna MA. Synthesis and characterization fication of the degradation products in solution. Biomaterials
of starch acetates with high degree of substitution. Cereal 2004;25:2687e93.
Chemistry 2004;81:735e40. [28] Follain N, Joly C, Dole P, Bliard C. Properties of starch based
[19] Xu YX, Miladinov V, Hanna MA. Starch acetateemaleate blends. Part 2. Influence of poly vinyl alcohol addition and
mixed ester preparation and characterization. Cereal Chemistry photocrosslinking on starch based materials mechanical proper-
2005;82:336e40. ties. Carbohydrate Polymers 2005;60:185e92.
[20] Mischnick P, K} uhn G. Model studies methyl amyloses: correlation [29] Tomasi G, Scandola M, Briese BH, Jendrossek D. Enzymatic
between reaction conditions and primary structure. Carbohydrate degradation of bacterial poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) by a depoly-
Research 1996;290:199e207. merase from Pseudomonas lemoignei. Macromolecules 1996;29:
[21] Steeneken PAM, Woortman AJJ. Substitution pattern in meth- 507e13.
ylated starch as studied by enzymic degradation. Carbohydrate [30] Benedict CV, Cook WJ, Jarrett P, Cameron JA, Huang SJ,
Research 1994;258:207e21. Bell JP. Fungal degradation of polycaprolactones. Journal of
[22] van der Burgt YEM, Bergsma J, Bleeker IP, Mijland PJHC, van Applied Polymer Science 1983;28:327e34.
der Kerk-van Hoof A, Kamerling JP, et al. Distribution of methyl [31] Mergaert J, Webb A, Anderson C, Wouters A, Swings J.
substituents in amylose and amylopectin from methylated potato Microbial degradation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(3-
starches. Carbohydrate Research 2000;325:183e91. hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) in soils. Applied Environ-
[23] van der Burgt YEM, Bergsma J, Bleeker IP, Mijland PJHC, mental Microbiology 1993;59:3233e8.
van der Kerk-van Hoof A, Kamerling JP, et al. FAB CIDMS/MS [32] Xu YX, Hanna MA. Preparation and properties of biodegrad-
analysis of partially methylated maltotrioses derived from able foams from starch acetate and poly (tetramethylene
methylated amylose: a study of the substituent distribution. adipate-co-terephthalate). Carbohydrate Polymers 2005;59:
Carbohydrate Research 2000;329:341e9. 521e9.
[24] Jang BC, Huh SH, Jang JG, Bae YC. Mechanical properties and [33] Chiellini E, Corti A, Roberto S. Biodegradation of poly(vinyl
morphology of the modified HDPE/starch reactive blend. Journal alcohol) based blown films under different environmental
of Applied Polymer Science 2001;82:3313e20. conditions. Polymer Degradation and Stability 1999;64:305e12.
[25] Kumbar SG, Kulkarni AR, Dave AM, Aminabhavi TM. [34] Singh RP, Pandey JK, Rutot D, Degée P, Dubois P. Bio-
Encapsulation efficiency and release kinetics of solid and liquid degradation of poly(3-caprolactone)/starch blends and composites
pesticides through urea formaldehyde crosslinked starch, guar in composting and culture environments; the effect of compatibi-
gum, and starch C guar gum matrices. Journal of Applied lization on the inherent biodegradability of the host polymer.
Polymer Science 2001;82:2863e6. Carbohydrate Research 2003;338:1759e69.