Scribd
Upload
538 views1 page

Encarnacion V CA

Petitioner sought to widen an existing right-of-way easement over a servient estate to transport plants from his growing nursery business to the highway. The servient estate owner opposed widening the easement. The Court ruled in favor of petitioner, finding that under Article 651 of the Civil Code, the width of an easement may change based on the needs of the dominant estate over time. Petitioner's plant nursery business had grown substantially, necessitating the use of modern transport like a jeepney that could not fit on the existing narrow path, so petitioner was entitled to widen the easement to accommodate his vehicle needs.

Uploaded by

marwantahsin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
538 views1 page

Encarnacion V CA

Petitioner sought to widen an existing right-of-way easement over a servient estate to transport plants from his growing nursery business to the highway. The servient estate owner opposed widening the easement. The Court ruled in favor of petitioner, finding that under Article 651 of the Civil Code, the width of an easement may change based on the needs of the dominant estate over time. Petitioner's plant nursery business had grown substantially, necessitating the use of modern transport like a jeepney that could not fit on the existing narrow path, so petitioner was entitled to widen the easement to accommodate his vehicle needs.

Uploaded by

marwantahsin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

G.R. No.

77628 March 11, 1991


TOMAS ENCARNACION vs.THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS
FACTS: Petitioner herein instituted an action to seek the issuance of a writ of easement of a
right of way over an additional width of at least two (2) meters over the servient estate owned by
private respondents. Petitioner alleged that his plant nursery business through sheer hard work
flourished and with that, it became more and more difficult for petitioner to transport his plants
from the nursery to the highway because his owner-type jeep which he would use for
transporting his plants could not pass through the road path provided by the owner of the servient
estate as access to the highway after it fenced its land. However, the servient estate owner
opposed for the additional easement of right of way.
ISSUE: W/N petitioner is entitled to a widening of an already existing easement of right-ofway?
HELD: YES, Article 651 of the Civil Code provides that "The width of the easement of right of
way shall be that which is sufficient for the needs of the dominant estate, and may accordingly be
changed from time to time." This is taken to mean that under the law, it is the needs of the
dominant property which ultimately determine the width of the passage. And these needs may
vary from time to time. When petitioner started out as a plant nursery operator, he and his family
could easily make do with a few pushcarts to tow the plants to the national highway. But the
business grew and with it the need for the use of modern means of conveyance or transport.
Manual hauling of plants and garden soil and use of pushcarts have become extremely
cumbersome and physically taxing. To force petitioner to leave his jeepney in the highway,
exposed to the elements and to the risk of theft simply because it could not pass through the
improvised pathway, is sheer pigheadedness on the part of the servient estate and can only be
counter-productive for all the people concerned. Petitioner should not be denied a passageway
wide enough to accommodate his jeepney since that is a reasonable and necessary aspect of the
plant nursery business.

You might also like