Muet Writing Example
Muet Writing Example
Answer
Question:
Study the chart and table below. Using only the information provided, analyse the sales of
three fast food outlets in the first quarter of 2012. In your answer, you are to link the
information presented in both visuals. You should write a report within 150-200 words.
Title
Sales of three fast food outlets in the first quarter of 2012
Introduction
The stimuli present a line graph on the sales of three fast food outlets in the first quarter of 2012
and a table on their promotional activities.
Overview/trend
In general, the sales of fast food outlets increases in direct relation with the amount of promotional
activities.
OR
In general, Ken Burger recorded the highest amount of sales especially when they carried out
promotional activities.
Key features
Analysis within each stimulus
Line graph:
According to the line graph, among the three fast food outlets, Ken Burger is the most popular
choice followed by Mario Pizza and Rays Fish & Chips.
The highest recorded sales was by Ken Burger in April as it rose sharply from RM3,000 to more
than RM4,000.
Sales for Ken Burger dipped between February and March to an all time low of below Rm1,900.
Mario Pizza achieved its highest sales of RM1,500 between February and March before
dropping to less than RM500 at the end of April.
Rays Fish & Chips was the least popular among the three fast food outlets selling less than
RM400 for all four months.
Table:
Ken Burger and Mario Pizza both carried out two promotional activities in the first quarter of
2012.
Rays Fish & Chips carried out the least number of promotional activities which was to give a
free drink in March.
Synthesis (linking between stimuli)
Ken Burgers sales increased when they carried out promotional activities in January (free
drinks) and April (gift voucher) whereas sales dipped when no promotions were carried out.
Similarly, Maria Pizzas sales also increased in February and March due to the two promotional
activities they held during that period.
Rays Fish & Chips had poor sales throughout the first quarter as they rarely had promotional
activities.
Furthermore, Rays Fish & Chips only offered a free drink in March and this resulted in only a
slight increase in sales.
Conclusion
In conclusion, attractive promotional activities organized by fast food outlets can positively affect
their sales.
OR
In conclusion, fast food outlets sales are boosted when they carry out promotional activities which
are attractive to customers such as offering gift vouchers or discounts.
The chart shows how students on all courses at a Malaysian university viewed different
subjects on a scale of easy to difficult. You should write 150 to 200 words.
Sample answer:
How Students on All Courses at a Malaysian University View Different Subjects According to
Different Levels of Difficulty
The bar chart shows how students who are studying in a Malaysian university rate different
subjects according to its difficulty easy, moderately difficult or difficult.
The subject which was most commonly rated as difficult was math, by 70% of the total
students. While only 20% of students saw it as easy. Physics was also largely judged to be a
difficult or moderately difficult subject. Only 25% of students viewed it as easy. By contrast,
chemistry was regarded as easy by a massive 70% of students.
As far as language subjects are concerned, languages in general were seen as easy by 40% of
students. This percentage dropped to 20% for oriental languages. African languages, however,
were viewed as easy by 60% of students. Next, Art was rated to be an easy subject by only 30% of
students and like Physics, 50% rated it as difficult.
In conclusion, there seems to be no clear correspondence between the type of subject and
whether it was generally rated as easy or difficult.
(168 words)
Tips for Task 1:
A title MUST be written
Title MUST be underlined
Write a minimum of 3 paragraphs (Introduction, body and conclusion). Students can also write
2 paragraphs for body.)
In a nutshell, materialism is a common agenda in the 21st century as more people are working hard
to afford things beyond their reach. While this may spur individuals to work harder to improve
their standard of living, overspending due to materialism may cause the downfall of a countrys
economy and their morality. In my opinion, I still firmly believe that materialism has a strong hold
on todays society; both positive and negative effects. Our government can encourage society to
be less frivolous and wasteful in spending by running campaigns such as Consumer Awareness
and Buy Malaysian Made Products in order to educate our younger generation for the prosperity
of our nation.
The debate between the supremacy of the genders have been in session since time immemorial. In
the past, it would seem that men had the upperhand but these days, women are starting to leave
their mark in many aspects from business to politics rather than just domestic affairs. In my humble
opinion, both men and women have the potential to be great leaders but the question of 'better
leaders' does not lie in a person's gender alone but his or her innate character. In this essay, let us
explore the qualities that make men and women great leaders before focusing on other factors that
are unrelated to gender.
First and foremost, men have some distinctive qualities that make them far better leaders than
women. We can attribute this to the fact that men are generally physically stronger than women.
This is undeniable because a man has clearly more muscle mass than a woman so in terms of
leadership that has to do with physical ability, men win hands down. For example, in the army,
most leaders are men that are buffed up and better able to handle the physical exertions of this field
compared to women who are more delicate in structure. Men are also known to have better ability
to strategise in terms of warfare and they seem to command their armies better. For example, great
leaders have been men such as Napoleon Bonaparte, Genghis Khan, Hitler and so on. Moreover,
men tend to be able to make quick decisions that are not usually based on their emotions but
logical, rational and practical reasons. Women, however, seem to be very emotional creatures so
they may make poor leadership decisions if they simply follow their feelings. Therefore, men have
many qualities like physical strength, ability to strategise well and make snap decisions which can
make them better leaders.
However, women have proven to be better leaders in an increasing number of cases. This can be
seen as more and more countries have entrusted women to be their leaders. These women have a
more 'feminine' approach to leadership which is more sensitive towards the needs of society. For
instance, history is peppered with exemplary female leaders such as Indira Ghandi, Benazir Bhutto,
Eva Peron and present day heroines such as Aung San Suu Kyi. Women tend to be more caring in
nature and quite patient in dealing with problems which makes them better leaders compared to
men who could be less sensitive and impatient. Most women are also known to be perfectionists,
and this is an advantage because they are often very meticulous and detailed in carrying out their
duties as leaders. Thus, with a more open-minded society, an increasing number of women are
being given the onus to take the lead and may even one day supersede men in their traditional
leadership roles!
Although I have gone to great lengths to show that both men and women have the ability to be
great leaders, I still completely believe that 'leadership' has little to do with gender and a lot to do
with a person's innate character. This means that to be a great leader does not depend on whether
you are male or female but rather your personal characteristics that drive you to succeed. Men and
women both possess the qualities of confidence, responsibility, time management and delegation
skills, public relations and good communication skills, positive outlook, high commitment,
creativity and innovation, forward-looking visionaries and many other characteristics of a good
leader. Hence, the question of gender should not arise because being male or female does not
guarantee the ability to lead well.
In conclusion, history has shown that men make better leaders but this is a faulty argument because
it does not take into consideration the fact in the old days women were discriminated against and
not allowed to lead. Today, society is more open-minded and more women are taking the helm
and proving that women can be better leaders. Nevertheless, leadership to me is 'genderless'
whereby it is completely dependent on a person's positive characteristics which makes people
respect them and want to follow in their footsteps. Every country needs more leaders regardless of
gender so the government should conduct more self-improvement leadership courses for the
younger generation so they may become better future leaders of our country.
Man's careless attitude is the main cause for the destruction of the environment. Discuss. You
should write at least 350 words. (60 marks)
Below is a good sample answer written by Franky, my 2013 lower 6 science student.
In this modern civilization, man struggles to survive the high cost of living expenses, which
significantly increases with each passing year. This causes them to use any method available that
generates income and they start to sideline the importance of preserving nature. This is due to
mankind realising the potential of economy that can come from nature. So, I strongly believe the
destruction of nature is mostly caused by man's careless attitude whereby they prioritise their greed
for money and the development of civilisation. Let us analyse this phenomenon in terms of the
country's development, illegal activities of exploiting nature and the job opportunities.
First of all, many nations try to achieve the title of the most leading nation in economy or
infrastructure. So in order to compete with other countries, most nations try to explore any
available land in their country for development such as industries, tourist spots and many other
purposes that are related to money. Whenever they see the potential of a certain piece of land, they
tend to develop it despite some of these places might still be uninhabited or the home for many
wildlife. Sometimes, they would also plod through jungles or level the mountains for road
development which severely changes the landscape of nature. As a result, this selfish and careless
act will cause the deforestation and global warming. For example, Indonesia has become quite
careless with their handling of these problems. In Kalimantan, Indonesia, the forest is being
severely deforested by their people for land development. And to make matters worse, they even
choose the fastest and cos-saving method of deforestation which is by burning down the trees, the
mass release of carbon dioxide from the mass burn down of trees lead to ozone thinning and
greenhouse effect. Also, the haze problem is another negative side product. As for the real victims
of these acts, they are the neighbouring nations such as Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and
Philippines especially as haze causes many health issues such as lung cancer and breathing
problems. Therefore, these careless acts and greed not only cause the destruction of nature but also
endanger many lives, both man and animals.
Secondly, some people's greed for great fortune and easy life make them become selfish and
careless by over-exploiting nature. They willingly do illegal activities such as cutting down trees
or animal hunting, seeing the high demand for these materials. It will slowly cause the
depopulation of different kinds of flora and fauna. In China, these activities of eating inner organs
of animals such as tiger or bear and they even use these animals' body parts for economic purposes
such as tiger skin, crocodile skin and elephant teeth and tusks by exporting it to those who pay a
high price for it. This has a serious effect on the ecosystem which is the extinction of animals. In
Indonesia, trees are being cut down for making expensive house furniture made of material such
as teak wood. In fact, these trees require a long period of 10 to 20 years to mature. Thus, the
continuous cutting down of trees will eventually lead to its extinction. These activities are illegal
by law and still occurs widely despite many countermeasures that have been taken by the
authorised organisations such as World Wildlife Fund (WWF). Somehow, these criminals are able
to slip through the organisations's enforcement laws of protecting the wildlife and nature. Plus,
most society are careless to even take notice of these problems because they have yet to come to
awareness of the dangers that would happen from these illegal acts. If only they had given more
attention and cooperation to the authorised organisations, these problems might have been able to
be prevented.
Lastly, to survive in this modern world, every person needs to be able to make a living for
themselves of their family, but many people with low education level cannot get high salary jobs,
even university scholars are yet to be certain of getting a proper job after their graduation despite
their high level of education. The competition is just like the survival of the fittest among these
graduates and people with low qualifications. Therefore with the growing demand for more natural
materials such as petroleum gas and minerals from the earth as well as a high demand of smuggled
goods, people are willing to pay high prices to have employees do their job of exploiting nature
because these jobs are high risk. So people that are desperately in need of jobs are usually tempted
with the pay and they would take up the call. This situation had opened up a lot of job opportunities,
but they are careless to not realise that these jobs are the main cause of nature's destructtion because
they are being pinned down by the pressure of high living cost in this modern world that they have
forgotten the importance of preserving nature.
In a nutshell, I still strongly believe in my opinion that nature's destruction is mainly caused by
man's careless attitude. They strive to make a living in the world so desperately that some
eventually deny the truth that it is their own fault for nature's destruction. If no serious and proper
actions are being taken immediately by many wildlife and nature preserving organisations or
authorised organisations such as WWF, UNESCO and ASEAN to prepare an effective strategy or
blueprint to prevent this problem, there probably won't be any jungles or wildlife left in the future
and our young generaton will have to live in a polluted world.
Question 2:
The trend today among youths is to own the latest technological gadgets such as mobile phones
and other devices. Is this a healthy development among young people? Give your opinion. You
should write at least 350 words.
In this modern world of ours, technological devices such as mobile phones and other gadgets
are no longer foreign to us. Most of the young people today are treating these luxuries as a necessity
as they compete to own the latest devices, leading to the adults questioning whether this is a
healthy or an unhealthy development for youths today. In my own humble opinion, this issue will
be a never-ending argument because it solely depends on the user itself to determine their purpose
of using these devices. Thus in this essay, this issue can be discussed in terms of both healthy and
unhealthy development and some recommendations.
Firstly, with these newest devices, young people can access information wherever there are
with just a touch of their fingers. This can help to expand their knowledge about the current issues
of our world which will be a key role to take their mind to a higher level. They can also use these
facilities to help them in their studies. All of these can help our country to produce more intellectual
people which indeed is a healthy development by contributing to a more productive nation.
In the old days, we had to do a lot of work and research in order to finish our school assignment,
which is time consuming and tiring. Now we can obtain any information we need for our
assignment without having the need to go to the library anymore. This can help the students to
save more time for them to do other things. Furthermore, students can also increase their efficiency
of work. The government also supports this by launching the Wireless Village programme so
that both rural and urban people can access the internet without having to subcribe to any internet
packages. Overall, students can perform better and become more productive in their work, so this
is certainly a healthy development.
Moreover, young people that chase after these latest technological devices can help to
strengthen the countrys commerce through the constant supply and demand of gadgets. This can
help the government to focus more on developing this technology or subsidising companies in this
industry as it can guarantee good profits. Besides, in line with the previous years budgets, the
government is giving out smart phone rebates to citizens above the age of 21. All of this can help
to improve our economic level and lead to a more developed country, therefore another sign that
it is a healthy development.
On the other hand, this trend to own the latest technology devices could lead to a waste of
money. Even though these devices are useful to us, but the fact is that most young people are
chasing the latest devices regardless of cost. Mind the word latest as they only want the latest
edition that is being released in the market almost once per year for different brands such as
Samsung and Sony. In order to keep up with the trend, these young people are willing to waste
their money or more accurately their parents hard-earned money. Instead, they could use the
money for better purposes like buying books or stationery.
Furthermore, as time goes by, they might eventually become ungrateful for what they already
have and keep nagging for new gadgets. This is unhealthy as it breeds materialism. In addition, if
one did not have proper discipline within oneself while using these devices, one will easily become
a victim to various addictions such as social networking and games. This can cause the young users
to become distracted and greatly decrease their work efficiency. As for students, their performance
at school might become affected. To add to the matter, young people can easily access
inappropriate content such as porn and violent materials at a young age, unsupervised. All of this
can retard their minds growth and become influenced by negative things. In the end, these devices
become a bane to them instead of a boon to the development of society.
Hence, for us to fully utilise the advantages of technology, I humble share some of my
recommendations. Firstly, parents play a big role as they spend the most time with their children
thus they should watch strictly over their childrens usage of these devices per day by limiting it.
Next, the government can work on preventing or blocking many harmful websites in our country
so that young people have no access to it.
In conclusion, I believe that in the end, it depends on the user itself whether to abuse or to
use the devices to their disadvantage or advantage. We can draw an analogy from guns used by
the police it enforces the law; by a criminal it abets the crime. It would be illogical to put the gun
in jail instead of the person who pulls the trigger. Similarly, it is we ourselves that click the mouse
or swipe the screen of our gadget so we must use it responsibly to contribute towards a happier
and healthier development in society today.