0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views1 page

Problem31 63

1) At resonance, the impedance of an RLC circuit equals the resistance due to the inductive and capacitive reactances cancelling out. 2) As the angular frequency deviates slightly from the resonant frequency, the impedance can be approximated as equal to the resistance plus a term proportional to the square of the frequency deviation. 3) The bandwidth of the circuit, defined as the frequency difference between the half-power points, is directly proportional to the resistance and inversely proportional to the inductance.

Uploaded by

IENCS
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views1 page

Problem31 63

1) At resonance, the impedance of an RLC circuit equals the resistance due to the inductive and capacitive reactances cancelling out. 2) As the angular frequency deviates slightly from the resonant frequency, the impedance can be approximated as equal to the resistance plus a term proportional to the square of the frequency deviation. 3) The bandwidth of the circuit, defined as the frequency difference between the half-power points, is directly proportional to the resistance and inversely proportional to the inductance.

Uploaded by

IENCS
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

V V

31.63: a)  I 0  at resonance since X L  X C .


Z R
 b)  ω  ω0  ω is small compared to ω0 .
2
 1 
Z R 2   ωL   .
 ωC 
2
 1  1
 ωL    2 2 (ω LC  1) .
2 2

 ωC  ω C
1 1 1 L2 ω04
ω  2
0 so C  2 4 . Thus 2 2  2
2

LC L ω0 ωC (ω0  2ω0 ω  ω 2 )
but ω 2 is very small so
1 L2 ω04 L2 ω02  2ω 
   L2 ω02 1  .
ωC2 2
(ω0  2ω0 Δω) 
2
2 ω   ω0 
1  
 ω0 
 1  ω ω 2 2ω ω 2
ω 2 LC  1  (ω02  2ω0 ω  ω 2 ) 2   1  1  2  2 1   2

 ω0  ω0 ω0 ω0 ω0
2 2 ω
Again, ω 3 is very small compared to ω0 , so ω LC  1  ω .
2

Putting this together gives


2 2
 1  2 2ω   2ω  8 L2 ω3
 ωL    L ω0 1      4 L2 ω 2 
2
.
 ωC   ω0   ω0  ω0
But  3 is much smaller than ω0 . Finally
2
 1 
 ωL    4 L2 ω 2 , so Z  R 2  4 L2 ω 2 .
 ωc 
1 V 1V
 c)  I  I0   or Z 2  (2 R ) 2 .
2 Z 2 R
3R 2 3 R
R 2  4 L2  2  4 R 2     2
 
4L 4 L
3 R 3 R 1 4L
ω  ω0  but   R  .
4 L 4 L LC 3C
R
 d)  ω1  ω2  2ω  3 . As R increases so does the width.
L
120 V 1
 e) (i)  I 0  15   8 A; ω0   1000 rad sec;
(2.50 H)(0.400  10 6 F)
15 
ω1  ω2  3  10.4 rad sec. (ii) I 0  80A, ω0  1000 rad s, ω1  ω2  1.04 rad sec .
2.50 H

You might also like