Scribd
Upload
210 views1 page

General Mark Scheme For Writing

The document outlines a 5 band marking scheme for writing applications, emails, and reports. Band 5 receives the highest marks of 9-10 and demonstrates full achievement of the task with minor errors. Band 4 receives 7-8 marks and achieves most of the task ambitions with some errors. Band 3 receives 5-6 marks for reasonably achieving the task with some non-impeding errors. Band 2 receives 3-4 marks for an inadequate attempt with numerous errors. Band 1 receives 1-2 marks for a poor attempt with serious errors and lack of structure.

Uploaded by

ChrisGu
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
210 views1 page

General Mark Scheme For Writing

The document outlines a 5 band marking scheme for writing applications, emails, and reports. Band 5 receives the highest marks of 9-10 and demonstrates full achievement of the task with minor errors. Band 4 receives 7-8 marks and achieves most of the task ambitions with some errors. Band 3 receives 5-6 marks for reasonably achieving the task with some non-impeding errors. Band 2 receives 3-4 marks for an inadequate attempt with numerous errors. Band 1 receives 1-2 marks for a poor attempt with serious errors and lack of structure.

Uploaded by

ChrisGu
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

General mark scheme for writing (Application Letter, Emails, and Reports)

Band Mark
5 Full realisation of the task set. 9 or 10
• All four content points achieved.
• Confident and ambitious use of language; errors are minor, due to
ambition and non-impeding.
• Good range of structure and vocabulary.
• Effectively organised, with appropriate use of simple linking
devices.
• Register and format consistently appropriate.
Very positive effect on the reader.
4 Good realisation of the task set. 7 or 8
• Three or four content points achieved.
• Ambitious use of language; some non-impeding errors.
• More than adequate range of structure and vocabulary.
• Generally well-organised, with attention paid to cohesion.
• Register and format on the whole appropriate.
Positive effect on the reader.
3 Reasonable achievement of the task set. 5 or 6
• Three content points achieved.
• A number of errors may be present, but are mostly non-impeding.
• Adequate range of structure and vocabulary.
• Organisation and cohesion is satisfactory, on the whole.
• Register and format reasonable, although not entirely successful.
Satisfactory effect on the reader.
2 Inadequate attempt at the task set. 3 or 4
• Two or three content points achieved.
• Numerous errors, which sometime impede communication.
• Limited range of structure and vocabulary.
• Content is not clearly organised or linked, causing some
confusion.
• Inappropriate register and format.
Negative effect on the reader.
1 Poor attempt at the task set. 1 or 2
• One or two content points achieved.
• Serious lack of control; frequent basic errors.
• Little evidence of structure and vocabulary required by task.
• Lack of organisation, causing a breakdown in communication.
• Little attempt at appropriate register and format.
Very negative effect on the reader.
0 Achieves nothing. Either fewer than 25% of the required number of 0
words or totally illegible or totally irrelevant.

You might also like